University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover
Investigations on the taxonomy of the genus Riemerella and diagnosis of Riemerella infections in domestic poultry and pigeons
Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
- Doctor of Veterinary Medicine - Doctor medicinae veterinariae (Dr. med. vet.)
by Dennis Rubbenstroth, PhD Bielefeld
Hannover 2012
Academic supervision Prof. S. Rautenschlein (Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Germany)
1st Referee Prof. S. Rautenschlein
2nd Referee Prof. P. Valentin-Weigand (Institute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Germany)
Date of oral exam: November 7 th , 2012
Meinen beiden Großmüttern in dankbarer Erinnerung
Table of contents v
Table of contents
Table of contents...... v List of abbreviations ...... vii Manuscripts and participation of this author ...... viii 1. Introduction ...... 1 2. Literature review ...... 3 2.1. Taxonomy of the genus Riemerella ...... 3 2.2. Morphology, identification and characterization of Riemerella spp...... 4 2.3. Epidemiology of Riemerella infections...... 8 2.4. Riemerella -induced disease in avian species ...... 10 2.5. Diagnosis of Riemerella infections ...... 15 3. Goals and objectives ...... 19 4. Isolation and characterization of atypical Riemerella columbina strains from pigeons and their differentiation from Riemerella anatipestifer ...... 21 5. Description of Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov., isolated from the pharynx of healthy domestic pigeons ( Columba livia f. domestica ), and emended description of the genus Riemerella , Riemerella anatipestifer and Riemerella columbina ...... 33 6. Evaluation of different diagnostic tools for the detection and identification of Riemerella anatipestifer ...... 55 7. Discussion ...... 85 7.1. Differentiation of Riemerella spp. by biochemical and morphological characteristics...... 86 7.2. Identification and detection of RA by a new PCR assay...... 87 7.3. Identification of Riemerella spp. based on whole cell mass spectrometry ...... 88 7.4. Riemerella serotyping...... 90 7.5. Role of Riemerella spp. as pathogens for domestic poultry and pigeons ...... 91 7.6. Future perspectives for Riemerella diagnosis and research...... 92 8. Summary ...... 93 9. Zusammenfassung...... 96 10. Literature ...... 101 Acknowledgements ...... 111
Table of contents vi
Manuscripts VII
List of abbreviations aMPV Avian Metapneumovirus MG Mycoplasma gallisepticum
ATCC American type culture MS mass spectrometry collection NDV Newcastle disease virus CSB Columbia sheep blood NGB Neomycin-Gentamycin-Blood dnaB DnaB helicase ompA outer membrane protein A DNA desoxy-ribonucleic acid PCR polymerase chain reaction ELISA enzyme linked immunosorbent PFGE pulse field gel electrophoresis assay
pPMV-1 pigeon-type Paramyxovirus 1 ERIC enterobacterial repetitive
intergenic consensus sequence RA Riemerella anatipestifer
GLC gas-liquid chromatography RC Riemerella columbina
IFT immunofluorescence test RCP Riemerella columbipharyngis
IgG immunoglobulin G RFLP restriction fragment length polymorphism IgY immunoglobulin Y
RNA ribonucleic acid kDa kilo Dalton
rpoB RNA polymerase beta subunit LAMP loop-mediated isothermal
amplification rRNA ribosomal RNA
LD 50 median lethal dose SDS-PAGE sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel MALDI-TOF matrix assisted laser electrophoresis desorption/ionisation - time of flight vapD virulence associated protein D Manuscripts VIII
Manuscripts and major contributions of this author
Chapter 4:
Rubbenstroth, D. , Hotzel, H., Knobloch, J., Teske, L., Rautenschlein, S. & Ryll, M. (2011).
Isolation and characterization of atypical Riemerella columbina strains from pigeons and their differentiation from Riemerella anatipestifer . Veterinary Microbiology, 147 , 103-112.
• sample collection and preparation
• cultivation, phenotypical and biochemical characterization of RC isolates
• MALDI-TOF MS analysis
• preparation of manuscript and corresponding author
Chapter 5:
Rubbenstroth, D. , Ryll, M., Hotzel, H., Christensen, H., Knobloch, J. K., Rautenschlein, S. & Bisgaard, M. (2013). Description of Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov., isolated from the pharynx of healthy domestic pigeons ( Columba livia f. domestica ), and emended descriptions of the genus Riemerella , Riemerella anatipestifer and Riemerella columbina . International Journal of Systematic and Evolutonary Microbiology, 63 , 280-287.
• sample collection and preparation
• cultivation, phenotypical and biochemical characterization of RCP isolates
• analysis of MALDI-TOF MS results
• preparation of manuscript and corresponding author Manuscripts IX
Chapter 6:
Rubbenstroth, D. , Ryll, M., Knobloch, J. K., Kohler, B. & Rautenschlein, S. (2013). Evaluation of different diagnostic tools for the detection and identification of Riemerella anatipestifer . Avian Pathology, 42 , 17-26.
• sample collection and preparation
• cultivation and identification of RA isolates
• analysis of RA sequences
• design and validation of a new RA-specific PCR
• serological examination of RA strains
• analysis of MALDI-TOF MS results
• preparation of manuscript
Introduction 1
1. Introduction
Riemerella anatipestifer (RA) and Riemerella columbina (RC) constitute the genus Riemerella within the family Flavobacteriaceae .
RA is known to be an economically important pathogen of domestic poultry. It is considered to be a primary pathogen of waterfowl and may cause high mortality in ducklings and goslings. In addition, gallinaceous birds, particularly turkeys, may also be affected by RA infections. RA- induced gross pathology is dominated by polyserositis, but lesions may also affect joints and the central nervous system. Clinical disease is characterized by respiratory signs, lameness and central nervous symptoms. Its considerable economic impact is caused by increased mortality, reduction of growth rates and enhanced condemnation rates at slaughter.
While RA is well characterized as an avian pathogen, only little is known about RC. So far it has been isolated almost exclusively from domestic pigeons. Its isolation from tissues showing gross lesions from clinically diseased pigeons suggests a pathogenic potential of RC for this host. However, epidemiological or experimental data to support this assumption is scarce.
Differentiation of RA and RC from each other, as well as from other related species, by biochemical characteristics is often difficult due to the low biochemical activity of many Flavobacteriaceae members. Molecular-biological methods, such as DNA-DNA hybridization or sequence analysis of certain well-conserved genes, may compensate this drawback under research conditions, but since they are time- and labour-consuming, they are not feasible for routine diagnostic purposes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation - time of flight (MALDI-TOF) based protein profiling have proven to be useful tools for the rapid detection and identification of bacterial pathogens. However, their value in the diagnosis of Riemerella infections has not been evaluated thoroughly to date.
The goal of this study was therefore to gain further knowledge about phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the at present poorly described species RC, as well as a potential new Riemerella sp. isolated from domestic pigeons ( Columba livia f. domestica ). Diagnostic methods to be used for detection, identification and differentiation of Riemerella spp. were Introduction 2
evaluated and compared with the aim of developing improved strategies for the diagnosis of Riemerella infections in domestic poultry and other avian species. Literature review 3
2. Literature review
2.1. Taxonomy of the genus Riemerella
Riemerella anatipestifer (RA), the type species of the genus Riemerella , was first described by Riemer (1904) as “bacterium exudativum anserum”, a bacterial pathogen isolated from diseased geese. Since then it has been designated Moraxella anatipestifer , Pfeifferella anatipestifer and Pasteurella anatipestifer, until it was finally classified as Riemerella anatipestifer (Floren et al. , 1987; Segers et al. , 1993). Later a second species, Riemerella columbina (RC), was affiliated to the genus (Vancanneyt et al. , 1999). RC strains isolated from pigeons had been first described by Hinz et al. (1994) as “ Riemerella -like taxon A”. Recently a group of strains, isolated from chickens in Morocco and tentatively named “ Riemerella -like taxon 2”, have been proposed to constitute a further separate species within the genus, based on sequence similarities of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and RNA polymerase beta subunit ( rpoB ) genes (Christensen & Bisgaard, 2010).
The genus Riemerella belongs to the family of Flavobacteriaceae within the rRNA superfamily V (Segers et al. , 1993; Bernardet et al. , 1996; Subramaniam et al. , 1997). Besides soil contaminants, pathogens of poikilothermic animals (Bernardet et al. , 1996) and potential human pathogens, such as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica (Kim et al. , 2005) or Wautersiella falsenii (Kämpfer et al., 2006), the family also contains several avian pathogens. Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (Vandamme et al. , 1994) is a well described pathogen of chickens and turkeys. Further potential avian pathogens closely related to Riemerella spp. are Coenonia anatina (Vandamme et al. , 1999) or Elizabethkingia meningoseptica (Vancanneyt et al. , 1994). Literature review 4
2.2. Morphology, identification and characterization of Riemerella spp.
2.2.1. Growth conditions and phenotype
Riemerella spp. are Gram-negative, non-sporulating, rod-shaped bacteria which are 0.3 to 0.5 µm in width and 1 to 2.5 µm in length. Both species, RA and RC, grow on enriched solid agar media, such as blood agar, peptone agar or chocolate agar, but not on MacConkey agar. Optimal growth is achieved under microaerobic conditions, but aerobic and anaerobic growth is also observed (Bangun et al. , 1981; Singh et al. , 1989; Rimler et al. , 1998; Sandhu, 2003; Vandamme et al. , 2006). Growth kinetic of RA in broth media, such as tryptose or trypticase soy broth, is improved by shaking or aerating the medium (Layton & Sandhu, 1984).
On appropriate solid culture media RA forms smooth, greyish, non-pigmented colonies, whereas RC is described to produce a grey-beige pigment (Segers et al. , 1993; Vancanneyt et al. , 1999; Vandamme et al. , 2006). CAMP-cohemolysis is phenotypically variable for RA, although all strains appear to possess the responsible gene cam (Pathanasophon et al. , 1994; Crasta et al. , 2002). CAMP data for RC is not available.
Both species show oxidase and catalase activity and liquefy gelatine. Urease production is variable. RA is negative for aesculin hydrolysis (Bangun et al. , 1981; Ryll & Hinz, 2000). In contrast to RA, Vancanneyt et al. (1999) found all RC strains to hydrolyse aesculin. Fermentation of carbohydrates by both species is poor when detected by standard methods (Bangun et al. , 1981). Use of buffered single substrate tests markedly increases the sensitivity of the assays, resulting in the majority of RA strains being positive for fermentation of dextrin, maltose, glucose and mannose (Hinz et al. , 1998a).
Naturally RA is highly susceptible to penicillin, ampicillin and erythromycin, and resistant to kanamycin, gentamycin, colistin, polymyxin B and sulfadimethoxin (Bangun et al. , 1981; Floren et al. , 1987; Singh et al. , 1989; Segers et al. , 1993; Pathanasophon et al. , 1994; Rimler et al. , 1998). Strains isolated from commercial poultry flocks may carry high frequencies of additional resistances (Behr, 2007; Metzner et al. , 2008; Yu et al. , 2008; Zhong et al. , 2009). Biofilm formation, which was found to be a variable characteristic of RA, increased the Literature review 5
resistance to antibiotic treatment (Hu et al. , 2010). Natural resistance profiles of RC closely resemble those of RA (Vancanneyt et al. , 1999).
Pigment production and aesculin hydrolysis are considered to be the major morphologic characteristics for the differentiation of RA and RC (Vancanneyt et al. , 1999; Vandamme et al. , 2006).
2.2.2. Molecular biological identification and fingerprinting
Taxonomic classification of Riemerella strains can be performed by DNA-DNA hybridization or rRNA-DNA hybridization (Piechulla et al. , 1986; Bangun et al. , 1987; Segers et al. , 1993; Vancanneyt et al. , 1999). In addition, sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene may be used to identify isolates (Subramaniam et al. , 1997). Christensen & Bisgaard (2010) also demonstrated partial sequencing of the rpoB gene to allow phylogenetic analysis and differentiation of Riemerella strains from other closely related avian isolates.
In addition to sequence analysis several other methods for molecular fingerprinting of RA strains have been reported. These methods include repetitive extragenic palindromic sequence polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) (Huang et al. , 1999; Yu et al. , 2008), enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence PCR (ERIC-PCR) (Kiss et al. , 2007), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the 16S rRNA gene (Subramaniam et al. , 1997; Pathanasophon et al. , 2002) or the outer membrane protein A ( ompA ) gene (Subramaniam et al. , 2000), restriction endonuclease analysis with HinfI (Rimler & Nordholm, 1998) and pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) following digestion with SmaI (Kiss et al. , 2007; Yu et al. , 2008). In general, all of these methods allowed the characterization of RA strains and their grouping into different clusters or genotypes. However, a widely used and standardized method and nomenclature for RA fingerprinting does not exist.
In addition, Riemerella spp. can be differentiated by analysis of whole cell protein profiles using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; Vancanneyt et al., 1999). Literature review 6
2.2.3. Sequence analysis and potential virulence factors
Until recently only few RA gene sequences have been available for phylogenetic analysis, design of diagnostic tools or investigation of potential virulence factors. The ompA gene was sequenced for numerous strains, showing a minimal similarity among the strains of about 88 %. Further analysis revealed no correlation of sequence clusters with serotype or host species of the strains (Subramaniam et al. , 2000; Tsai et al. , 2005; Yu et al. , 2008). Hu et al. (2011a) reported the design of an ompA -deletion mutant of the RA serotype 2 strain Th4 (Th4∆ompA), which showed an attenuated phenotype with respect to median lethal dose (LD 50 ) in ducklings, bacterial load in the blood as well as adhesion to and invasion into Vero cells. This data indicates that ompA is a virulence factor of RA, which may act as an adhesin. The plasmid- encoded genes virulence associated protein D1 ( vapD 1) and vapD 2 were identified in about 60% of 60 RA strains tested. They were speculated to be putative virulence factors of RA based on sequence similarities to vapD genes of Actinobacillus spp., Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Chang et al. , 1998; Weng et al. , 1999).
The recent publication of the complete genomes of three RA strains, including the type strain ATCC 11845 T, may soon lead to the discovery of further virulence factors (Mavromatis et al. , 2011; Yuan et al. , 2011; Zhou et al. , 2011). Based on homologies to sequences derived from other bacterial genera Zhou et al. (2011) already proposed several candidate genes, including the putative extracellular collagenase prtC or the sspA gene, which shows homology to C5a proteases of streptococci.
2.2.4. Chemotaxonomic characterization
Chemotaxonomic characterization of bacterial strains is performed according to their whole cell fatty acid composition measured by gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) analysis. This method allows the identification of Riemerella spp. and their differentiation from other Flavobacteriaceae (Sugimoto et al. , 1983; Lambert & Moss, 1984; Bangun & Tripathy, 1987; Segers et al. , 1993; Hinz et al. , 1998b; Vancanneyt et al. , 1999; Ryll & Hinz, 2000; Ryll et al. , 2001). Literature review 7
2.2.5. Serological characterization
Serological classification of RA can be performed by slide agglutination assay using serotype- specific rabbit sera (Bisgaard, 1982; Sandhu, 2003). For about two decades different nomenclatures, using letters or Arabic numbers, existed in parallel (Harry, 1969; Sandhu & Harry, 1981; Bisgaard, 1982; Brogden et al. , 1982). Finally, Sandhu & Leister (1991) harmonized the systems and established the nowadays commonly accepted nomenclature using Arabic numbers. This nomenclature has been updated several times since, resulting in RA serotypes 1 to 21 being classified to date (Loh et al. , 1992; Pathanasophon et al. , 1995; Ryll & Hinz, 2000; Pathanasophon et al. , 2002). However, the isolation of several serologically untypeable RA strains indicates the existence of further, yet unclassified serotypes (Köhler et al. , 1997; Metzner et al. , 2008).
In addition, the existence of several RA isolates was reported, which gave clearly positive reactions with two or even more reference sera. It remains unclear whether this phenomenon may be explained by cross-reactivity or whether these strains carry more than one set of serotype-determining antigens at the same time (Rimler & Nordholm, 1998; Pathanasophon et al. , 2002).
The molecular basis of serotype determination is not well understood. The ompA gene appears to be not a major determinant of serotype differentiation, since ompA sequences were reported not to correlate with serotype (Subramaniam et al. , 2000; Tsai et al. , 2005; Yu et al. , 2008). In agreement with these findings, the mutant strain Th4∆ompA, which lacks the expression of the ompA protein, and its wildtype parent strain showed similar agglutination with a serotype- specific serum (Hu et al. , 2011a). In contrast, the potential surface protein P45 was suggested to be immunogenic and may thus be a potential candidate for development of subunit vaccines or tools for serological diagnosis (Huang et al. , 2002a, b).
No information is available on the existence of different serotypes within the species RC. Literature review 8
2.3. Epidemiology of Riemerella infections
2.3.1. Epidemiology and host species of RA
RA has been detected in a wide range of different avian species worldwide (Sandhu, 2003). It is considered to be endemic in areas with high density of domestic waterfowl. For example in, the region of Weser Ems in Lower Saxony, which is the region with the highest poultry density in Germany, RA is frequently isolated from commercial turkey flocks as well as from domestic waterfowl, with serotype 1 being the most common serotype (Köhler, 1995; Cortez de Jäckel et al. , 2004; Behr, 2007; Metzner et al. , 2008). Several groups reported that more than one serotype may be present in parallel in a single flock at the same time (Sandhu & Harry, 1981; Pathanasophon et al. , 2002; Metzner et al. , 2008; Fulton & Rimler, 2010).
In domestic ducks and geese RA is considered to be a primary pathogen and causes considerable economic losses due to severe clinical disease and mortality (Riemer, 1904; Graham et al. , 1938; Asplin, 1955; Pierce & Vorhies, 1973; Hatfield & Morris, 1988; Sarver et al. , 2005). In addition, RA was also isolated from several other wild and captive waterfowl species (Donahue & Olson, 1969; Karstad et al. , 1970; Munday et al. , 1970; Wobeser & Ward, 1974; Hinz et al. , 1998b). The susceptibility of turkeys to RA infection was demonstrated by cases of natural infections reported from numerous countries and confirmed by experimental infection via different inoculation routes (Zehr & Ostendorf, 1970; Helfer & Helmboldt, 1977; Bendheim et al. , 1978; Smith et al. , 1987; Frommer et al. , 1990; Charles et al. , 1991; Cooper & Charlton, 1992; Cortez de Jäckel et al. , 2004; Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). Following natural or experimental infection RA-induced disease was also observed in other gallinaceous species, such as chickens, pheasants, guinea fowl, quails and partridges (Bruner et al. , 1970; Munday et al. , 1970; Rosenfeld, 1973; Smith et al. , 1987; Sandhu, 2003; Li et al. , 2011). In contrast, pigeons did not develop clinical signs after RA inoculation via intramuscular and intraperitoneal injection (Graham et al. , 1938; Asplin, 1955) and only few RA isolations from this species have been reported (Pascucci et al. , 1990). Hinz et al. (1998b) isolated RA strains from additional avian species, such as budgerigar, herring gull and guillemot.
Information on RA infection of mammalian species is scarce. Rabbits and mice were reported to be refractory to experimental RA infection, while guinea pigs died after intraperitoneal Literature review 9
inoculation of high RA doses (Hendrickson & Hilbert, 1932; Graham et al. , 1938; Sandhu, 2003). Hinz et al. (1998b) reported the isolation of RA from domestic pigs suffering from severe pneumonia. Interestingly, RA was also found in two cases of cat bites of human patients (Talan et al. , 1999).
Although considered to be a primary pathogen, RA was also found at a high prevalence in the respiratory tract of clinically healthy ducks (Ryll et al. , 2001). Consequently, latently infected adults and wild birds are considered to be the reservoir for infection of juvenile domestic poultry (Karstad et al. , 1970; Leibovitz, 1972). Horizontal transfer is considered to be the main route of RA transmission and may occur via respiratory uptake and skin lesions (Asplin, 1956; Leibovitz, 1972; Hatfield & Morris, 1988; Sarver et al. , 2005; Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). Survival of RA in turkey litter was demonstrated for at least three weeks, demonstrating that environmental sources may enable the bacteria to be transmitted also to flocks subsequently placed in the same premises (Bendheim & Even-Shoshan, 1975). Cooper et al. (1989) suggested that mosquitoes play a role in RA transmission within turkey flocks as well as between different premises. The possibility of vertical RA transmission has not yet been conclusively demonstrated, although Glünder et al. (1989) isolated the pathogen from embryonated goose eggs.
2.3.2. Epidemiology and host species of RC
RC was first described as “ Riemerella -like taxon A” (Hinz et al. , 1994), before being classified as a new species within the genus Riemerella (Vancanneyt et al. , 1999). Until now it has been isolated almost exclusively from domestic pigeons (C. livia f. domestica ) in Germany. The only known exceptions were isolated from a tree shrew ( Tupaia glis ) that died in the Copenhagen zoo (Christensen & Bisgaard, 2010), and from the brain of a young ostrich ( Struthio camelus ) kept on a farm in Germany (Bocklisch et al. , 2011). Isolation of RC from columbid species other than C. livia , as well as from domestic poultry, has not been reported, yet.
No information is available on the prevalence of RC in domestic pigeons, its geographical distribution and its potential routes of transmission. Literature review 10
2.3.3. Riemerella -like bacterial species isolated from pigeons
Bacterial isolates phenotypically resembling the genus Riemerella are regularly reported. These isolates often lack definite identification, due to the difficulties in unequivocal differentiation of Flavobacteriaceae species solely by biochemical standard procedures. Several reports describe the isolation of such Riemerella -like bacteria also from domestic pigeons (Andreasen & Sandhu, 1993; Hinz et al. , 1994; Soike et al. , 2001). However, not all of these strains are actually close relatives of Riemerella . The “ Riemerella -like taxon A” described by Hinz et al. (1994) was indeed confirmed to belong to the genus Riemerella and constituted the new species RC (Vancanneyt et al. , 1999). The “ Riemerella -like taxons B” and “C” described in the same report were later classified as Pelistega europea, which belongs to the Proteobacteria (Vandamme et al. , 1998). The strains isolated by Andreasen & Sandhu (1993) originated from two outbreaks of severe respiratory disease in domestic pigeons. They were indistinguishable from RA by the biochemical tests performed by the authors. However, growth characteristics and antibiotic resistance profiles were different. Thus the classification of the isolates remained uncertain. Soike et al. (2001) frequently found Riemerella -like bacteria in young pigeons suffering from Pigeon Circovirus infection, but further information about the characterization of the isolates was not provided.
2.4. Riemerella -induced disease in avian species
RA is considered to be a primary pathogen of domestic waterfowl, whereas its pathogenic role for turkeys and other gallinaceous birds is less clearly defined (Sandhu, 2003; Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). Due to its pathogenicity RA has considerable impact on economical and animal welfare aspects in waterfowl and turkey operations. Economic losses are caused by decreased weight gain and increased mortality as well as by condemnation of carcasses at slaughter due to polyserositis (Ziedler et al. , 1984; Charles et al. , 1991). RC was isolated predominantly from diseased pigeons. Nevertheless, only little is known about its pathogenic potential (Vancanneyt et al. , 1999). Literature review 11
2.4.1. Pathogenicity, clinical signs and pathology
Experimental RA infection of ducks, turkeys and chickens by parenteral inoculation via intramuscular, intravenous or subcutaneous injection results in rapid onset of clinical disease, septicaemia, gross lesions and mortality (Hendrickson & Hilbert, 1932; Asplin, 1955; Munday et al. , 1970; Rosenfeld, 1973; Baba et al. , 1987; Smith et al. , 1987; Hatfield & Morris, 1988; Cooper, 1989; Cooper & Charlton, 1992; Charles et al. , 1993; Sarver et al. , 2005). In ducks also inoculation via respiratory routes leads to systemic infection and mortality. In contrast, clinical disease was only inconsistently observed following oral RA inoculation (Hendrickson & Hilbert, 1932; Graham et al. , 1938; Baba et al. , 1987; Hatfield & Morris, 1988; Sarver et al. , 2005). Turkeys inoculated with high RA doses by aerosol developed systemic infections, but only mild clinical disease and gross pathology (Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). Oral RA inoculation of turkeys via drinking water did not result in infection and manifestation of the disease (Eleazer et al. , 1973).
Clinical signs occur within few days following infection and include apathy, respiratory symptoms, diarrhoea, lameness and central nervous symptoms (Hendrickson & Hilbert, 1932; Graham et al. , 1938; Pickrell, 1966; Bruner et al. , 1970; Frommer et al. , 1990; Cooper & Charlton, 1992). In susceptible ducklings morbidity and mortality was reported to be as high as 75 % (Asplin, 1955), whereas mortality in naturally infected turkey flocks varied between less than 1 % and 12 % (Zehr & Ostendorf, 1970; Cortez de Jäckel et al. , 2004). However, RA- infected poultry flocks may also remain clinically healthy (Ryll et al. , 2001; Cortez de Jäckel et al. , 2004).
Gross lesions characteristic for RA infections are the presence of fibrinous exudates on serosal surfaces, including pericarditis, perihepatitis and airsacculitis. Myocarditis, pneumonia, chronic arthritis and splenomegaly were also reported (Hendrickson & Hilbert, 1932; Graham et al. , 1938; Pickrell, 1966; Bruner et al. , 1970; Karstad et al. , 1970; Zehr & Ostendorf, 1970; Pierce & Vorhies, 1973; Wobeser & Ward, 1974; Helfer & Helmboldt, 1977; Charles et al. , 1993; Cortez de Jäckel et al. , 2004; Rubbenstroth et al., 2009). Cooper & Charlton (1992) observed spondilitis of thoracic vertebrae after intravenous RA inoculation of turkeys. Most prominent histopathological findings in RA-infected birds included fibrinous meningitis and polyserositis, but inflammatory and necrotic lesions were also observed in brain, lung, heart, spleen and liver (Graham et al. , 1938; Marshall et al. , 1961; Pickrell, 1966; Jortner et al. , 1969). Detection of Literature review 12
RA antigen and intact bacterial cells by immunofluorescence test (IFT) confirmed the association of the pathogen with these lesions (Marshall et al. , 1961).
The course of RA infection as well as the severity of disease is influenced by the age and immune status of the affected birds. Resistance of ducks to RA infection was reported to increase with age, with two- to eight–week-old ducklings constituting the most severely affected group in field outbreaks (Dougherty et al. , 1955; Leibovitz, 1972). The presence of exacerbating environmental factors and complicating concurrent infections may also influence the outcome of the disease (Charles et al. , 1991). Escherichia coli , Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG), Mycoplasma synoviae , Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) or Avian Metapneumovirus (aMPV) have been shown to be associated with RA infection in turkeys (Bendheim et al. , 1978; Charles et al. , 1991; Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009), whereas in waterfowl it is commonly found in combination with duck hepatitis virus, duck plague virus, circoviruses or E. coli (Soike et al. , 1999; Shawky et al. , 2000; Campagnolo et al. , 2001; Banda et al. , 2007).
Data collected from intravenously inoculated turkeys indicate, that RA may persist after the cessation of clinical signs and may be reactivated by immunosuppressive treatment such as with dexamethasone (Cooper & Charlton, 1992).
RC has been found predominantly in diseased pigeons and pure cultures were isolated from organs showing gross lesions. The clinical signs and lesions included respiratory symptoms, bronchopneumonia, fibrinous aerosacculitis, perihepatitis, pericarditis and epicarditis. Thus, they closely resembled those caused by RA in susceptible species. RC isolation was often accompanied by detection of other pigeon pathogens such as E. coli or pigeon-type Paramyxovirus 1 (pPMV-1) (Hinz et al. , 1994; Vancanneyt et al. , 1999). These findings suggest a pathogenic potential of RC in domestic pigeons, although it might be not a primary pathogen. However, no detailed epidemiological or experimental data is available to prove these assumptions. Literature review 13
2.4.2. Immunity and immunoprophylaxis
After recovery from RA infection ducks are protected against re-infections (Hendrickson & Hilbert, 1932; Graham et al. , 1938), but only little is known about the immune mechanisms involved in this protection.
RA-specific antibodies induced by experimental infection or vaccination were detected in sera and tracheal washings of ducks (Hatfield et al. , 1987; Floren et al. , 1988; Hatfield & Morris, 1988; Higgins et al. , 2000; Lobbedey & Schlatterer, 2003) and turkeys (Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). Inoculation of turkeys via respiratory routes resulted in detectable serum antibodies as early as four days after infection (Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). Serum antibodies in ducks were first detected at five to seven days after vaccination with an inactivated vaccine and remained detectable for at least 105 days. Transfer of IgY to the offspring of vaccinated female ducks via egg-yolk was observed for up to 35 days after the last vaccination (Hatfield et al. , 1987; Floren et al. , 1988; Lobbedey & Schlatterer, 2003).
Conclusive data on the induction of RA-specific T-lymphocyte-mediated immunity is not available. Leukocytes isolated from blood or spleens of RA-vaccinated ducks were shown to proliferate after ex vivo stimulation with RA antigen. However, the responsiveness to ex vivo stimulation lasted for only up to four weeks in ducks vaccinated with an inactivated vaccine, while the responsiveness achieved by live vaccination was of longer duration (Higgins et al. , 2000). It has to be noted that the nature of the proliferating cells was not determined in this study. Thus, the proliferative response is not attributable to a certain cell type.
Vaccination with inactivated whole cell vaccines has been widely used in ducks and was reported to effectively reduce mortality under field conditions (Layton & Sandhu, 1984; Sandhu & Layton, 1985). However, experimental studies indicate that for sufficient protection at least two injections of the vaccine are required. Since this protection still is rather short-lived a third vaccination performed at about 30 days of age was found to be necessary in Pekin duck flocks to completely cover the fattening period ending at about seven weeks of age (Sandhu, 1979; Layton & Sandhu, 1984; Sandhu & Layton, 1985). Use of oil-emulsion vaccines enhanced the immune response and prolonged protection, but was not feasible for use in domestic poultry flocks due to the induction of lesions at the site of vaccination (Sandhu, 1979; Floren et al. , 1988; Higgins et al. , 2000). Literature review 14
Several other approaches have been tested to overcome the drawbacks of inactivated vaccines. Live vaccination of ducklings with avirulent RA strains, applied once by aerosol or drinking water during the first week of age, resulted in a long-lasting protection against virulent strains of the same serotype for at least six weeks (Sandhu, 1991). Pathanasophon et al. (1996) reported cell-free broth culture filtrate vaccines to provide high degrees of homologous protection. Two experimental subunit vaccines containing either recombinant ompA or an N-terminally truncated form of P45 (P45N’) induced seroconversion in ducklings, but did not prevent mortality after challenge with a heterologous RA strain (Huang et al. , 2002b).
In general, monovalent RA vaccines provide low cross-protection against challenge with heterologous serotypes (Sandhu, 1979; Sandhu, 1991; Pathanasophon et al. , 1996), which is in congruence with the low degree of cross-reactivity between RA serotypes in serological tests and leukocyte proliferation assays (Higgins et al., 2000). Therefore polyvalent vaccines were developed to include a small number of serotypes most commonly detected in the respective region (Sandhu, 1979; Layton & Sandhu, 1984; Sandhu & Layton, 1985; Sandhu, 1991). In Germany, autologous vaccines are widely used in waterfowl and turkey flocks in areas with increased risk of RA infections (Behr, 2007; Metzner et al. , 2008).
Data on maternally derived immunity against RA infection is scarce. Köhler (1995) demonstrated, that offspring of ducks repeatedly vaccinated with an inactivated vaccine was partly protected against intramuscular RA challenge. The LD 50 was increased about 16-fold compared to the offspring of unvaccinated parents.
RC vaccines as well as information about RC-induced immunity are not available.
2.4.3. Treatment of Riemerella infections
RA infection in poultry can be treated by administration of antibiotic or sulfonamide drugs applied via drinking water, feed or by parenteral injection (Sandhu, 2003; Vandamme et al. , 2006). Experimental and field studies demonstrated treatment with enrofloxacin (Turbahn et al. , 1997), oxytetracyclin (Ash, 1967), penicillin (Sandhu & Dean, 1980), combinations of penicillin and streptomycin (Ash, 1967; Sandhu & Dean, 1980), lincomycin (Sandhu & Dean, 1980), novobiocin (Sandhu & Dean, 1980), sulfamethazine (Asplin, 1955) or combinations of Literature review 15
sulfdimethoxine and ormetoprim (Mitrovic et al. , 1980; Sandhu & Dean, 1980) to reduce mortality, clinical disease and bacterial shedding in RA-infected birds. Therapy is more likely to be successful the earlier after infection it is started (Sandhu & Dean, 1980). However, a study of Behr (2007) analysing RA isolates collected in Lower Saxony over the past years demonstrated a rise in resistance against several antibiotics, such as tetracyclines, amoxicillin and enrofloxacin. This may further complicate successful antibiotic treatment in the future.
Only recently several novel antimicrobial peptides were identified, which possess in vitro activity against RA. The antibacterial effect is presumably caused by damaging the bacterial plasma membrane. In vivo studies demonstrated parenteral injection of the peptides to significantly reduce mortality when administered up to 24 hours prior to or after experimental RA infection (Pan et al. , 2010).
2.5. Diagnosis of Riemerella infections
RA-induced disease is clinically indistinguishable from other septicaemic or exudative diseases, such as those caused by E. coli , Pasteurella multocida, Chlamydia psittaci or MG infection. Thus, detection of the pathogen is mandatory for a definite diagnosis (Rimler et al. , 1998; Sandhu, 2003).
Diagnostic material feasible for RA isolation includes pharyngeal swabs, respiratory organs and also a variety of internal organs, such as spleen, liver, heart and brain in cases of bacteraemia. Cultivation can be performed directly on agar media under microaerobic conditions for 24 to 72 hours. Previous enrichment steps are not recommended (Pickrell, 1966; Floren et al. , 1987; Rimler et al. , 1998; Ryll et al. , 2001). The use of selective media, containing aminoglycosides, may improve Riemerella isolation (Köhler, 1995; Rimler et al. , 1998; Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). Identification of isolates is traditionally achieved by biochemical characteristics using commercial galleries, such as API 20 NE or API ID 32E. However, differentiation may be difficult due to the low fermentative activity of Riemerella spp. (Floren et al. , 1987; Hinz et al. , 1998a; Hinz et al. , 1998b; Vandamme et al. , 2006). Literature review 16
RA diagnosis often includes subsequent investigations, such as serotyping or antibiotic resistance tests. Thus, it most often requires isolation of the pathogen. Nevertheless, the use of PCR assays would provide an additional tool for rapid detection and identification of RA.
Several PCR assays were designed to target RA-specific sequences (Crasta et al. , 2002; Tsai et al. , 2005; Kardos et al. , 2007). However, most of these assays were intended to be used for sequence analysis or molecular fingerprinting of RA strains, rather than for identification of isolates or detection of RA directly from diagnostic samples. Thus most of these assays are of little use for diagnostic purposes. A 16S rRNA gene-specific PCR (Tsai et al. , 2005), as well as an assay targeting a non-specified region of the RA genome (Kardos et al. , 2007) were shown to give positive results also with other bacterial species closely related to RA (Christensen & Bisgaard, 2010). In contrast, an ompA PCR failed to detect some of the RA strains tested (Tsai et al. , 2005). More recently another conventional PCR assay and a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, both targeting the ompA gene, have been proposed to specifically detect RA (Zheng et al. , 2011). However, these assays have been performed so far only with few RA serotypes and other closely related species have not been tested yet.
For detection of RA-specific antibodies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) have been developed for ducks and turkeys (Hatfield et al. , 1987; Higgins et al. , 2000; Huang et al. , 2002a; Lobbedey & Schlatterer, 2003; Sandhu, 2003; Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). In experimentally infected turkeys significantly increased levels of RA-specific IgG can be detected as early as four days post infection (Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). Detection of RA- specific antibodies from other avian species can be achieved by agglutination or agar gel precipitation methods (Harry, 1969; Bisgaard, 1982; Sandhu, 2003). However, the existence of numerous serotypes with only low degrees of cross-reactivity restricts the diagnostic use of serology based on whole antigen preparations to those outbreaks, in which the RA serotypes involved are known. To overcome this problem, Huang et al. (2002a) developed an ELISA system based on a recombinant RA-protein (P45N’), which detects antibodies directed against a variety of RA serotypes. This may close a diagnostic gap and may be suitable for serological routine monitoring of commercial poultry flocks.
RC can be isolated from diagnostic materials by the same methods as described for RA (Vancanneyt et al. , 1999; Vandamme et al. , 2006). However, since only little is known about its Literature review 17
pathogenic potential, interpretation of RC detection may be difficult. Diagnostic methods other than isolation are not yet available for this species. Literature review 18
Goals and objectives 19
3. Goals and objectives
The bacterial genus Riemerella with the poultry pathogen RA is of considerable importance for veterinary microbiology. Despite the considerable economic impact of RA on poultry production many problems regarding its identification and characterization still remain to be solved. RC, the second member of the genus, is less well characterized and its distribution and pathogenic potential in pigeons as well as in other avian species remain uncertain. The literature indicates that additional, yet unclassified Riemerella spp. may exist. Thus the overall goal of this study was to gain more knowledge on the genus Riemerella , with particular interest in detection, differentiation and identification of the different Riemerella spp.
The study was divided into three projects:
The first project (Chapter 4) was designed to collect information on the species RC, which was proposed to be a pathogen of domestic pigeons. Before this study was initiated, RC had been isolated mainly from diseased domestic pigeons, but no information was available on its presence in healthy individuals. Therefore one objective was to test healthy domestic and free- living pigeons for RC. RA and RC have been reported to be distinguishable by only few phenotypic characteristics, making unequivocal species identification difficult. Thus, a further objective of this project was the detailed phenotypic and genotypic characterization of RC isolates, in order to identify further parameters for the differentiation of RC from other related species and particularly RA.
During the investigations described in Chapter 4 a group of bacterial strains was isolated from pharyngeal swabs of healthy pigeons, which closely resembled Riemerella spp., but could not be identified as any known bacterial species. Therefore, the objectives of the second project (Chapter 5) were the phenotypic and genotypic characterization of these strains and the clarification of their taxonomic position within the genus Riemerella .
Previous studies indicated that RA is difficult to distinguish from other closely related bacteria by routine diagnostic methods, which is mainly due to its poor biochemical activity. The results of the first two projects of this study (Chapters 4 & 5) strongly supported this view. The aim of the third project (Chapter 6) was the evaluation of new diagnostic strategies for the detection Goals and objectives 20
and identification of RA from diagnostic samples. This approach addressed design and validation of a RA-specific PCR assay, RA identification by whole cell MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting and comparison of different methods for RA serotyping. Atypical Riemerella columbina strains 21
4. Isolation and characterization of atypical Riemerella columbina strains from pigeons and their differentiation from Riemerella anatipestifer
Dennis Rubbenstroth 1, Helmut Hotzel 2, Johannes Knobloch 3, Lydia Teske 1, Silke Rautenschlein 1 and Martin Ryll 1
1 Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany
2 Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich Loeffler Institute (FLI) Jena, Naumburger Str. 96a, 07743 Jena, Germany
3 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
Published as:
Rubbenstroth, D., Hotzel, H., Knobloch, J., Teske, L., Rautenschlein, S. & Ryll, M. (2011). Isolation and characterization of atypical Riemerella columbina strains from pigeons and their differentiation from Riemerella anatipestifer . Veterinary Microbiology, 147 , 103-112. Atypical Riemerella columbina strains 22
Abstract
Riemerella columbina (RC) and Riemerella anatipestifer (RA) belong to the genus Riemerella within the family Flavobacteriaceae . While RA is a well-described pathogen of waterfowl and other avian species, only little is known about RC. Previous work reporting the isolation of RC from internal organs of clinically diseased pigeons suggested a potential pathogenic role in this avian species. In this study we examined pharyngeal swabs collected from pigeons and found RC to be widely distributed also among healthy birds. Further characterization of 81 RC- isolates revealed several atypical strains, which differed from all previously described RC- isolates by the lack of aesculin-hydrolysis activity (17 isolates) or by expression of yellow or orange pigmentation (6 isolates). Sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA and outer membrane protein A (ompA) gene supported the affiliation of these strains to the species RC. Aesculin- hydrolysis negative isolates were found to be biochemically indistinguishable from RA. We demonstrated that bacterial fingerprinting using matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI–TOF MS) analysis is useful for the identification and differentiation of RC and RA.
Weblink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.06.008 Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov. 33
5. Description of Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov., isolated from the pharynx of healthy domestic pigeons ( Columba livia f. domestica ), and emended description of the genus Riemerella , Riemerella anatipestifer and Riemerella columbina
Dennis Rubbenstroth 1, Martin Ryll 1, Helmut Hotzel 2, Henrik Christensen 3, Johannes Karl-Mark Knobloch 4, Silke Rautenschlein 1 and Magne Bisgaard 3
1 Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
2 Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich Loeffler Institute (FLI) Jena, Naumburger Str. 96a, D-07743 Jena, Germany
3 Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
4 Department of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany
Published as:
Rubbenstroth, D., Ryll, M., Hotzel, H., Christensen, H., Knobloch, J. K., Rautenschlein, S. & Bisgaard, M. (2013). Description of Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov., isolated from the pharynx of healthy domestic pigeons ( Columba livia f. domestica ), and emended descriptions of the genus Riemerella , Riemerella anatipestifer and Riemerella columbina . International Journal of Systematic and Evolutonary Microbiology, 63 , 280-287. Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov. 34
Abstract
A group of eleven bacterial strains was isolated during microbiological investigations of pharyngeal swabs collected from domestic pigeons ( Columba livia forma domestica ). Phenotypical properties of the isolates closely resembled those of members of the genus Riemerella within the family Flavobacteriaceae . The genus presently contains two species, Riemerella anatipestifer and Riemerella columbina . The pigeon isolates differed from R. columbina by lack of pigment production and negative CAMP cohemolysis reaction. They grew more slowly at 37 °C under microaerobic conditions and showed reduced viability during storage under aerobic conditions at different temperatures, as compared to both Riemerella species. Comparisons of protein profiles with matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation - time of flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis allowed differentiation between the new pigeon isolates and both R. anatipestifer and R. columbina . Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene and RNA polymerase beta subunit (rpoB) gene sequences supported the affiliation of the eleven strains to a new species within the genus Riemerella , for which we propose the name Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov. The type strain is R. columbipharyngis 8151T (= DSM 24015T = LMG 26094T).
Weblink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.036798-0 Diagnosis of Riemerella anatipestifer 55
6. Evaluation of different diagnostic tools for the detection and identification of Riemerella anatipestifer
Dennis Rubbenstroth 1, Martin Ryll 1, Johannes Karl-Mark Knobloch 2, Bernd Köhler 3 and Silke Rautenschlein 1
1 Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
2 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany
3 Ripac-Labor GmbH, Am Mühlenberg 11, D-14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
Published as:
Rubbenstroth, D., Ryll, M., Knobloch, J. K., Kohler, B. & Rautenschlein, S. (2013). Evaluation of different diagnostic tools for the detection and identification of Riemerella anatipestifer . Avian Pathology, 42 , 17-26. Diagnosis of Riemerella anatipestifer 56
Abstract
Riemerella anatipestifer (RA) is an important avian pathogen with considerable impact on poultry production worldwide. However, the diagnosis of RA infections may be difficult, mainly due to problems with unequivocal differentiation of RA from other Flavobacteriaceae and a lack of standardized methods and reagents. The aim of the present study was therefore to complement the routine diagnostic strategies for RA by design and evaluation of alternative diagnostic tools.
We designed and validated a new RA-specific PCR assay, which proved to be a valuable tool for the identification of RA isolates as well as for rapid and sensitive RA detection directly from diagnostic samples. Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation - time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) fingerprinting of whole bacterial cells was also demonstrated to efficiently identify RA isolates. Furthermore, this method may also provide opportunities for RA subtyping. In our study, a stable subcluster was formed by the MS profiles of a group of RA isolates originating from turkey flocks in Northern Germany, suggesting an epidemiological relationship of these isolates. Serotyping is a further important measure to characterize RA isolates. We tested a set of commercially available anti-RA sera with RA serotype reference strains and field isolates to allow comparison between these sera and reference sera. In summary, this report contributes to the improvement of present microbiological and molecular strategies for the diagnosis of RA infections by providing new tools as well as enhanced knowledge on existing methods.
Weblink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2012.752066 Discussion 85
7. Discussion
The genus Riemerella within the bacterial family of Flavobacteriaceae is at present constituted by the species RA and RC (Segers et al. , 1993; Vancanneyt et al. , 1999). Both Riemerella spp. are isolated predominantly from avian species. RC was discussed to play a pathogenic role in pigeons. A very recent report of a RC infection in a young ostrich suggests that it may be pathogenic also for other avian species. RA is an important pathogen of domestic waterfowl and therefore the best characterized species within the genus (Sandhu, 2003). Despite the considerable economic impact of RA many diagnostic aspects of Riemerella infections still remain to be elucidated.
This study provides new data on the genus Riemerella and its detection in pigeons and domestic poultry. It describes the new species Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov. (RCP), isolated from apparently healthy domestic pigeons and proposed to be the third member of the genus Riemerella . In addition, the isolation of atypical RC strains from pigeons is reported. The detailed phenotypic characterization of these strains revealed hitherto unknown problems in unequivocal differentiation of Riemerella spp. using conventional biochemical methods. This emphasizes the necessity for development of additional diagnostic methods. Therefore, the capacities of MALDI-TOF MS based bacterial fingerprinting were investigated to close this diagnostic gap. In addition, a new PCR assay was designed and validated for the identification of RA isolates as well as for the specific and sensitive detection of RA in diagnostic samples.
This thesis contains three manuscripts in which the results of the different parts of this study are presented:
Chapter 4: Isolation and characterization of atypical Riemerella columbina strains from pigeons and their differentiation from Riemerella anatipestifer
Chapter 5: Description of Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov., isolated from the pharynx of healthy domestic pigeons ( Columba livia f. domestica ), and emended description of the genus Riemerella , Riemerella anatipestifer and Riemerella columbina Discussion 86
Chapter 6: Evaluation of different diagnostic tools for the detection and identification of Riemerella anatipestifer
This chapter summarizes the results of the three aforementioned chapters and provides a combined discussion of the data and future perspectives for Riemerella research.
7.1. Differentiation of Riemerella spp. by biochemical and morphological characteristics
Flavobacteriaceae , including the genus Riemerella , are Gram-negative bacteria, many of which possess relatively low fermentative activity. Due to this fact, identification and differentiation by standard biochemical methods is often difficult, leading to numerous misidentifications and incorrect classifications of strains. The history of the genus Riemerella is rich in examples of such misidentified isolates. The reference strains of the former RA serotypes 4 and 20 were later excluded from this species and subsequently replaced by new RA serotypes (Loh et al. , 1992; Ryll & Hinz, 2000). Similarly, strain Coenonia anatina 1502 T initially had been proposed to belong to RA (Köhler, 1995; Vandamme et al. , 1999). In addition, many isolates tentatively described as “ Riemerella -like” bacteria based on biochemical characteristics, were by more detailed taxonomic analysis identified as only distantly related species, such as Pelistega europea, a member of the Proteobacteriaceae family (Vandamme et al. , 1998).
Biochemical differentiation is not only difficult between Riemerella spp. and related species, but also within the genus Riemerella . Aesculin hydrolysis was initially reported to allow differentiation of RC and RA. However, this study reports the isolation of RC isolates, which are negative for aesculin hydrolysis and thereby indistinguishable from RA by standard biochemical methods. Differences in pigment production (non-pigmented for RA in contrast to grey-beige, yellow or orange pigment for RC) remain to be the only parameter facilitating species differentiation by classical phenotypical characterization. However, investigators need to be experienced with the genus Riemerella for species identification by this characteristic (Chapter 4).
Similar problems with species differentiation were revealed by the discovery of the newly described species RCP. All currently identified RCP isolates are negative for aesculin Discussion 87
hydrolysis, CAMP co-hemolysis and pigment production (Chapter 4). The absence of CAMP reaction and pigmentation allows the differentiation of RCP from RC isolates, which are positive for these parameters (Chapter 5). In contrast, RA is aesculin hydrolysis-negative and non-pigmented, while CAMP reaction is variable. Thus, RCP is indistinguishable from CAMP- negative RA strains by morphological and biochemical characteristics. However, both species differ from each other regarding their viability after storage at low temperatures, with RCP loosing viability already after few days.
The results presented here demonstrate, that standard diagnostic measures do not allow reliable identification of Riemerella spp. Alternative phenotypical parameters, such as pigmentation or viability after storage, are not feasible in routine diagnostics. Thus, new diagnostic methods able to replace biochemical analysis as the method of choice for identification and characterization of Riemerella spp. are highly demanded.
7.2. Identification and detection of RA by a new PCR assay
PCR assays can be used for rapid and specific identification of bacterial isolates as well as for detection of pathogens directly from diagnostic samples. However, assays previously published for the detection of RA failed to achieve these goals, mainly due to lack of specificity (Tsai et al. , 2005; Christensen & Bisgaard, 2010) or did not provide data on their ability to differentiate between different Riemerella spp. (Hu et al. , 2011b). In this study a newly designed and thoroughly validated RA-specific PCR is presented (Chapter 6). The PCR assay correctly identified all tested RA reference strains and field isolates. Its specificity was confirmed by negative results obtained with a variety of different poultry pathogens, including close relatives of RA, such as RC, RCP, ORT or Coenonia anatina , as well as with samples collected from RA-free poultry. In addition, comparative examinations of diagnostic samples collected from 69 poultry flocks revealed a good correlation between the novel PCR assay and RA cultivation. RA detection by PCR even proofed to outcompete cultivation, when examining samples which had been transported for several days with insufficient cooling. In summary, these data confirm, that the assay is a reliable, specific and sensitive tool for the identification of RA isolates as well as for RA detection directly from diagnostic samples. Discussion 88
RA cultivation is a prerequisite for subsequent diagnostic investigations, such as determination of antibiotic resistance profiles or serotypes. Therefore RA detection by PCR should not be considered as a measure to replace cultivation. However, availability of a sensitive and reliable PCR assay may be advantageous for special diagnostic purposes, such as rapid diagnosis or investigations of diagnostic materials unsuitable for RA isolation.
The PCR assay described herein specifically detects RA, whereas no PCR is available for the identification of RC or RCP. Since both species so far have been detected mainly in pigeons and their pathogenic potential is largely unknown (Vancanneyt et al. , 1999 and Chapters 4 & 5), advanced tools for their detection are not yet requested. However, if they were to gain increased importance as poultry pathogens in the future, development of a multiplex PCR may provide a useful tool for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of all three Riemerella spp., as already demonstrated for numerous other bacterial genera, such as Salmonella , Campylobacter or Listeria (Wesley et al. , 2002; Al Amri et al. , 2007; de Freitas et al. , 2010).
7.3. Identification of Riemerella spp. based on whole cell mass spectrometry
Bacterial fingerprinting by MALDI-TOF MS is gaining importance in identification of bacterial and fungal species and may be used for diagnostic as well as for taxonomic or epidemiologic purposes (Bizzini & Greub, 2010; Murray, 2010; Welker & Moore, 2011). The method is based on the analysis of whole cell mass spectra, which are mainly determined by abundantly and stably expressed bacterial proteins, such as ribosomal, cell surface and regulatory proteins. Species identification is achieved by comparing sample spectra to a reference strain database. Thus, the existence of comprehensive reference databases is crucial (Carbonnelle et al. , 2011; Welker & Moore, 2011).
In this study whole cell MS proofed to reproducibly differentiate RA, RC and RCP from each other as well as from other closely related poultry pathogens, such as ORT or Coenonia anatina (Chapters 4 & 5). Analysis of mass peaks also proofed to be a useful taxonomic tool for the description and classification of the new species RCP, which possesses only few characteristic properties possible to be determined by classical identification methods, such as biochemical characterization (Chapter 5). Discussion 89
While MALDI-TOF spectra of RC and RCP each formed a single cluster, the group of RA strains was subdivided into different subgroups (Chapter 6). A subcluster of 12 potentially epidemiologically linked field isolates was robustly identified using different analysis conditions. The subcluster was identified in dendrograms created by the Bruker MALDI biotyper software and confirmed by employing the identification tool of the software. In contrast, individual mass peaks characteristic for the cluster could not be identified.
Subtyping below species level has been reported also for a variety of different bacterial species, e.g. for Staphylococcus spp. or Salmonella spp. (reviewed in Murray, 2010). Wolters et al. (2011) applied the analysis of individual characteristic mass peaks to affiliate methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates to different clonal complexes. In other studies with Gallibacterium anatis or Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates dendrograms generated by the Bruker MALDI biotyper software were used to link subclusters to different epidemiologic origins (Dubois et al. , 2010; Alispahic et al. , 2012).
The results of this study indicate, that MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting may become a useful tool for intra-species RA subtyping. However, advanced bioinformatics are required to sufficiently improve reliability and technical convenience of bacterial subtyping under diagnostic conditions. Further investigations on RA subtyping should include higher numbers of reference and field isolates and MALDI-TOF fingerprinting should be compared to other fingerprinting method, such as ERIC PCR. This may lead to an improved understanding of the nature of the RA subcluster identified here as well as to the identification of further subclusters of closely related isolates.
MALDI-TOF MS requires considerable financial investments due to the necessity of a mass spectrometer and analysis software. However, analysis itself is easy, inexpensive and quick. Thereby for laboratories with high sample numbers total costs per analysis are estimated to be reduced by a factor of about four as compared to biochemical identification methods (Bizzini & Greub, 2010; Carbonnelle et al. , 2011). A particular advantage of MALDI-TOF MS based bacterial fingerprinting is the differentiation of species which are difficult to identify by biochemical methods, as demonstrated for Riemerella spp. in this study and for other members of the Flavobacteriaceae by Mellmann et al. (2008). Whole cell MS will become an important diagnostic tool in veterinary microbiology and poultry medicine, once the databases are extended to contain sufficient numbers of reference spectra from these fields of interest. Discussion 90
7.4. Riemerella serotyping
RA serotyping is an important diagnostic measure, not only to gain epidemiological information about RA outbreaks, but also for development and selection of the most promising vaccination strategy. The use of RA serotyping in routine diagnostics is hampered by the fact that reference sera are available for only a small number of specialized laboratories (Metzner et al. , 2008). To overcome these obstacles some laboratories use a commercially available set of anti-RA sera (Behr, 2007). However, this set is not based on established RA reference strains and uses a nomenclature different from the commonly used nomenclature of Sandhu & Leister (1991). This may lead to misinterpretation of results. In this study the commercial sera were evaluated with RA reference strains. The results showed that some of the sera gave clear reactions with only one reference strain each. Other sera reacted with more than one reference strain. The existence of RA isolates carrying antigenic surface proteins of more than one serotype has been proposed and may explain the source of these sera (Brodgen et al. , 1982; Pathanasophon et al. , 2002). In addition, some of the sera did not show reactions with any of the tested RA strains (Chapter 6). The reference strain of serotype 20, as well as strains of several proposed new RA serotypes (Köhler et al. , 1997; Metzner et al. , 2008) were not available to be tested in this study. Thus, at least some of the non-reacting sera may represent these serotypes. However, since the origin of the sera is unknown, it cannot be excluded that some of them were produced against isolates in fact misidentified as RA. These restrictions of the commercial system have to be considered for correct interpretation of results.
Information on the presence of different serotypes within the species RC and RCP is not available. Likewise, it is not known whether isolates of these species may cross-react with RA- specific sera. A RC strain isolated from a juvenile ostrich in Germany was reported to be reactive with a RA serotype 4 antiserum. However, the origin of the reference sera used for serotyping was not indicated by the authors (Bocklisch et al. , 2011). Future research on the genus Riemerella should target investigations on the molecular basis of Riemerella serotypes as well as the valid characterization of proposed new RA serotypes (Köhler et al. , 1997; Metzner et al. , 2008 and Chapter 6). Discussion 91
7.5. Role of Riemerella spp. as pathogens for domestic poultry and pigeons
RA naturally infects a variety of avian species. Its importance as a pathogen of domestic waterfowl is well established. In addition, a facultatively pathogenic potential has been demonstrated also for gallinaceous species, particularly for turkeys (Sandhu, 2003; Rubbenstroth et al. , 2009). The isolation of RA from domestic pigeons has been reported only at few occasions (Pascucci et al. , 1990; Köhler et al. , 1997). However, since differentiation with standard methods is complicated and no detailed characterization of the isolates were provided, it cannot be excluded that these reports may be due to misidentification of biochemically similar strains of other related species, such as RC or RCP.
In contrast to RA, not much is known about the pathogenic potential of RC and the newly identified species RCP. To date, both species have been found mainly in columbiformes, while their occurrence in domestic poultry has not been reported.
RC was initially isolated mainly from pigeons suffering from diseases similar to those caused by RA in waterfowl and turkeys, such as polyserositis or pneumonia (Hinz et al. , 1994; Vancanneyt et al. , 1999). These findings suggested RC to be of considerable pathogenic potential for pigeons. Although no representative epidemiological sampling was performed, the results of this study indicate RC to be widely prevalent also on the mucosal surfaces of healthy domestic and feral pigeons ( C. livia f. domestica ) as well as of wild common wood pigeons (Columba palumbus ). Altogether approximately 70 % of all examined pharyngeal swab samples were RC-positive (Chapter 4). This current knowledge indicates that RC is presumably no primary pathogen for pigeons, but it may serve as a facultative pathogen. Whether RC strains isolated from diseased pigeons may differ in their virulence from those isolated from apparently healthy pigeons remains to be elucidated.
The new species RCP has been isolated only from apparently healthy domestic and feral pigeons (Chapter 5). Its isolation from clinically diseased pigeons or pathologic lesions has not been reported, arguing against a primary pathogenic role. The prevalence of RCP appears to be lower as compared to RC. While RC was isolated from 76% out of 37 tested domestic pigeon flocks, RCP was isolated from only 16% of these flocks. A correlation between RC-positive and RCP-positive flocks was not observed (data not shown). However, considering the low viability Discussion 92
of RCP under laboratory conditions, isolation rates determined in this study may underestimate its real distribution.
Recently, Bocklisch et al. (2011) reported the isolation of RC from the brain of a young ostrich, which had died for unknown reasons. The authors claimed that the RC infection was likely to have been the cause of death. Although final prove for this hypothesis is missing, their data shows that RC infection may not be restricted to pigeons but may also affect other avian species. The same may be true for RCP.
7.6. Future perspectives for Riemerella diagnosis and research
The improved diagnostic tools and strategies presented in this study may facilitate investigation of Riemerella spp. infections in their respective established hosts as well as in potential unknown host species. Thereby they will help to classify potential new members of the genus and to shed light on their biology importance as pathogens of domestic poultry and other avian species.
Further work on RA serotyping should include not only the valid publication of new genotypes, but also the investigation of the molecular base of serologic differentiation and crossreactivity. This may provide valuable information to improve diagnostic tools and may furthermore facilitate the development of new multivalent whole cell or subunit vaccines simultaneously protecting against a range of heterologous RA serotypes.
Since MALDI-TOF MS bacterial fingerprinting is gaining more and more importance in veterinary diagnostics, more detailed investigations on its utilization for discrimination of bacteria at species or subtype level may result enhanced diagnosis options not only for Riemerella spp., but also for other important poultry pathogens, such as ORT or E. coli . Summary / Zusammenfassung 93
8. Summary
Dennis Rubbenstroth
Investigations on the taxonomy of the genus Riemerella and diagnosis of Riemerella infections in domestic poultry and pigeons
The genus Riemerella belongs to the Flavobacteriaceae family and is at present constituted by the species Riemerella anatipestifer (RA) and Riemerella columbina (RC). RA is an economically important pathogen of waterfowl and gallinaceous birds, particularly turkeys. It induces exudative and septicaemic diseases, with prominent gross lesions such as polyserositis. Its considerable economic impact is due to increased mortality, reduced growth rates and enhanced condemnation rates at slaughter. While RA is distributed in a wide range of avian species, so far RC has been isolated almost exclusively from domestic pigeons. It is suspected to have a pathogenic potential for this host and to cause diseases similar to those induced by RA. However, experimental or epidemiological evidence for this assumption is missing.
Like many Flavobacteriaceae members RA and RC possess only poor biochemical activity, which makes differentiation from each other, as well as from other related species, difficult. The goal of this study was therefore to increase the knowledge on the members of the genus Riemerella with particular interest in development of improved strategies for the diagnosis of Riemerella infections in domestic poultry and other avian species.
The first project of this study (Chapter 4) was designed to shed light on the role and distribution of RC in domestic and free-living pigeons and to provide data on the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the isolates. Investigation of pharyngeal swabs revealed RC to be widely distributed among healthy domestic and feral pigeons ( Columba livia f. domestica ) and common wood pigeons ( Columba palumbus ), with about 70 % of the samples being RC- positive. Further characterization of 81 RC isolates revealed several atypical strains, which differed from all previously described RC isolates by the lack of aesculin hydrolysis activity (21.0 % of all isolates; n = 81) or by expression of yellow or orange pigmentation (7.4 %). Since positive aesculin hydrolysis reaction had been considered to be the most important characteristic for differentiation of RC from RA, the aesculin hydrolysis negative isolates were Summary / Zusammenfassung 94
found to be biochemically indistinguishable from RA. Sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA and outer membrane protein A ( ompA ) gene, supported the affiliation of these strains to the species RC. Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation - time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI- TOF MS) analysis was tested as an additional method for species identification and proved to reliably differentiate RC and RA strains.
During the same project a group of eleven bacterial strains was isolated from pharyngeal swabs collected from domestic pigeons. Phenotypical properties of these isolates closely resembled those of the genus Riemerella . Thus the aim of the second project (Chapter 5) was to further characterize the genotypic and phenotypic properties of this group of isolates and to clarify their taxonomic position. The isolates differed from RC by lack of pigment production and negative CAMP co-haemolysis reaction. In contrast, unequivocal morphological and biochemical differentiation from RA was not possible. The strains grew more slowly at 37 °C under microaerobic conditions and showed reduced viability during storage under aerobic conditions at different temperatures, as compared to both Riemerella spp. Comparison of MALDI-TOF MS whole cell spectra revealed a high similarity among the new pigeon strains and allowed their differentiation from RA and RC. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene and RNA polymerase beta subunit ( rpoB ) gene sequences supported the affiliation of the eleven strains to a new species within the genus Riemerella , for which the name Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov. (RCP) was proposed. All strains were isolated from healthy pigeons, indicating an only low pathogenic potential or commensal role of the new species for pigeons.
The results of Chapters 4 & 5 revealed the sole use of biochemical methods to be insufficient for inter-species differentiation within the genus Riemerella . Despite the importance of RA as an avian pathogen with considerable impact on poultry production worldwide, diagnosis of RA infections is often difficult, due to lack of standardized methods and reagents. Therefore the aim of the third project of this study (Chapter 6) was to complement the routine diagnostic strategies for RA by evaluation of further diagnostic tools. A new RA-specific PCR assay was designed and validated and proved to reliably identify RA isolates, while avian isolates of closely related bacterial species, including RC and RCP, were not detected. Comparative investigation of diagnostic samples collected from a variety of poultry flocks demonstrated the PCR assay to detect RA as efficiently as cultivation methods. Whole cell MS proved to be an efficient tool for RA identification. The identification of a stable subcluster of potentially epidemiologically Summary / Zusammenfassung 95
linked RA isolates may indicate further opportunities for RA subtyping using this method. In addition, a set of commercially available anti-RA sera was tested with established RA serotype reference strains, yielding new data to improve RA serotyping under routine diagnostic conditions.
In summary, this study identified the new species RCP and atypical RC strains isolated from pigeons and gave insights into the pathogenic role of these species for their hosts. Biochemical characterization of the isolates disclosed problems of inter-species differentiation within the genus Riemerella . Additional methods, such as PCR or whole cell MALDI-TOF MS, were evaluated for the identification of RC, RCP and particularly for RA, the most important poultry pathogen in the genus. The results of this study contribute to a further improvement of present strategies for the diagnosis of Riemerella infections. Summary / Zusammenfassung 96
9. Zusammenfassung
Dennis Rubbenstroth
Untersuchungen zur Taxonomie des Genus Riemerella und Diagnostik von Riemerella - Infektionen beim Wirtschaftsgeflügel und bei Tauben
Riemerella anatipestifer (RA) und Riemerella columbina (RC) bilden gemeinsam den Genus Riemerella innerhalb der Familie der Flavobacteriaceae . RA hat große wirtschaftliche Bedeutung als Erreger der „Infektiösen Serositis“ des Wassergeflügels, ebenso wie als Sekundärerreger bei anderen Geflügelspezies, vor allem der Pute. In Deutschland ist RA vor allem in Regionen mit hoher Geflügeldichte weit verbreitet. Im Gegensatz dazu wurde RC bislang vor allem aus Tauben isoliert. Die Bedeutung des Keims als Krankheitserreger ist noch weitgehend unklar, auch wenn sein Nachweis in Reinkultur aus pathologisch veränderten Organen erkrankter Tauben ein zumindest fakultativ pathogenes Potential vermuten lässt. Erkenntnisse über das Vorkommen von RC beim Wirtschaftsgeflügel liegen nicht vor.
Trotz der großen wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung von RA sind noch immer viele Fragen in Bezug auf die Diagnostik von Riemerella-Infektionen offen. Dies liegt nicht zuletzt daran, dass RA und RC nur eine geringe biochemische Aktivität besitzen und daher nur schwer voneinander oder von anderen Vertretern der Flavobacteriaceae abzugrenzen sind. Das Ziel dieser Studie war daher, neue Erkenntnisse zur Identifikation und Typisierung von Riemerella spp. zu liefern und dadurch dazu beizutragen, die Diagnostik von Riemerella -Infektionen zu verbessern.
Ziel des ersten Teilprojekts dieser Dissertation (Kapitel 4) war es, die Rolle und Verbreitung von RC in Taubenpopulationen zu untersuchen und die gesammelten Isolate phenotypisch und genotypisch zu analysieren. Etwa 70 % der untersuchten Rachentupferproben von gesunden Haus- bzw. Stadttauben ( Columba livia f. domestica ) und Ringeltauben ( Columba palumbus ) waren positiv. Dies spricht zum einen für eine weite Verbreitung des Erregers in norddeutschen Taubenpopulationen, zum anderen deuten die Zahlen an, dass RC bestenfalls als fakultativ pathogener Erreger einzustufen ist. Die Fähigkeit zur Hydrolyse von Äskulin wurde bisher als wichtigstes Merkmal zur biochemischen Abgrenzung von RC gegenüber RA beschrieben. Jedoch fehlte 17 der insgesamt 81 im Rahmen dieser Studie untersuchten RC-Isolate dieses Summary / Zusammenfassung 97
Merkmal, so dass sie mit biochemischen Routineuntersuchungen nicht von RA zu unterscheiden waren. Als alternative Methoden zur Differenzierung wurde neben der Sequenzanalyse des 16S rRNA Gens und des „outer memrane protein A“ ( ompA ) Gens auch die massenspektrometrische Analyse mittels „Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation - time of flight mass spectrometry“ (MALDI-TOF MS) getestet. Mit Hilfe dieser Methode konnten alle getesteten RC-Stämme korrekt identifiziert und von RA abgegrenzt werden.
Im Rahme derselben Studie wurden außerdem elf weitere Bakterien-Stämme von den Rachenschleimhäuten untersuchter Tauben isoliert, die morphologisch und biochemisch große Ähnlichkeit mit den bekannten Vertretern des Genus Riemerella aufwiesen. Ziel des zweiten Teilprojekts der Dissertation (Kapitel 5) war daher eine umfassende phenotypische und genotypische Charakterisierung sowie die auf diesen Daten basierende taxonomische Einordnung der Tauben-Isolate. Die Isolate ließen sich von RC zuverlässig durch die fehlende Pigment-Expression sowie durch das Fehlen einer CAMP-Cohämolyse-Reaktion unterscheiden. Im Gegensatz dazu war eine morphologische oder biochemische Differenzierung der neuen Isolate von RA nicht möglich. Das Verhalten der Tauben-Isolate in Kultur unterschied sich von dem der beiden bekannten Riemerella -Vertreter dahingehend, dass sie unter mikroaeroben Bedingungen langsameres Wachstum zeigten und während der Lagerung im Kühlschrank nur für kurze Zeit lebensfähig blieben. Diese Eigenschaften eignen sich jedoch nur sehr bedingt als diagnostische Unterscheidungsmerkmale. Die Analyse von MALDI-TOF Massenspektren ergab eine hohe Übereinstimmung der elf Isolate untereinander sowie eine deutliche Abgrenzung zu RA und RC sowie zu weiteren getesteten Vertretern der Flavobacteriacea - Familie. Phylogenetische Analysen der 16S rRNA und „RNA polymerase beta subunit“ ( rpoB ) Gene sprachen für eine Klassifizierung der Isolate als neue Spezies innerhalb des Genus Riemerella . Der vorgeschlagene Name für die neue Spezies ist Riemerella columbipharyngis sp. nov. (RCP). Da alle elf bisherigen Stämme aus gesunden Tauben isoliert wurden, kann davon ausgegangen werden, dass RCP voraussichtlich keine große Pathogenität für Tauben besitzt.
Die Ergebnisse der Kapitel 4 & 5 haben gezeigt, dass es aufgrund der recht geringen biochemischen und morphologischen Unterschiede der Riemerella -Vertreter schwierig ist, diese sicher mit Hilfe etablierter routine-diagnostischer Methoden voneinander zu differenzieren. Für die Diagnostik von RA besteht trotz seiner großen Bedeutung als Geflügelpathogen die Problematik, dass molekularbiologische Nachweis- und Typisierungsverfahren nicht in Summary / Zusammenfassung 98
ausreichendem Maße etabliert und standardisiert sind. Das Ziel des dritten Teilprojekts (Kapitel 6) bestand daher darin, alternative Methoden für den Nachweis und die Identifikation von RA zu entwickeln bzw. zu validieren.
PCR-Tests eignen sich sowohl zur sicheren Identifikation von Bakterien-Isolaten, als auch zum schnellen und sensitiven Nachweis von Erregern direkt aus diagnostischem Material. Für den Nachweis von RA wurden mehrere Tests veröffentlicht, von denen sich jedoch aufgrund unzureichender Spezifität oder fehlendem Nachweis aller RA-Varianten keiner für den Einsatz in der Routinediagnostik eignet. Ein weiterer als potentielle Diagnostik-PCR veröffentlichter Test lieferte im Rahmen dieses Projekts falsch positive Ergebnisse bei der Untersuchung von Trachealtupfern aus RA-freien Puten.
Aufgrund des Fehlens einer RA-spezifischen PCR wurde, basierend auf Sequenzen von 20 RA- Serotyp-Referenzstämmen, ein neuer PCR-Test entwickelt. Der Test lieferte Banden der korrekten Größe mit allen 20 RA-Referenzstämmen und mit allen 18 getesteten RA- Feldisolaten verschiedener Serotypen. Negative Ergebnisse wurden mit 10 Nicht-RA-Stämmen (u.a. RC, RCP, Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale , Coenonia anatina ) sowie Tupfern von RA- freien Puten erzielt. Die vergleichende Untersuchung von eingesandten Proben aus 69 Geflügelbeständen zeigte eine gute Übereinstimmung zwischen RA-Anzucht und PCR- Nachweis. Insgesamt 28 der 69 Bestände waren positiv mit beiden Verfahren, während im Fall von drei Beständen, für die die Anzucht aufgrund langer Versanddauern unmöglich war, RA nur noch mit der PCR nachgewiesen werden konnte.
Wie schon in den vorangegangenen Teilprojekten für RC und RCP gezeigt, eignete sich die massen-spektrometrische Analyse von Protein-Profilen mittels MALDI-TOF MS auch für den schnellen und zuverlässigen Nachweis von RA. Innerhalb der Gruppe der RA Stämme konnte eine weitere Unterteilung der Profile in verschiedene Untergruppen beobachtet werden. Vor allem eine Gruppe von 12 möglicherweise in epidemiologischem Zusammenhang stehenden RA-Isolaten aus Puten bildete einen deutlich abzugrenzenden Subcluster. Inwieweit die Zuordnung zu derartigen Subclustern in Zukunft auch für diagnostische oder epidemiologische Aussagen herangezogen werden kann, bedarf weiterer Untersuchungen.
Die Serotypisierung ist ein weiterer wichtiger Baustein der Diagnostik von RA-Infektionen. Da zwischen den einzelnen RA-Serotypen bestenfalls geringe Kreuzimmunität besteht, ist das Summary / Zusammenfassung 99
Wissen über die in einem Bestand oder einer Region zirkulierenden Serotypen von großer Bedeutung für die Auswahl und Herstellung bestandsspezifischer Vakzinen. In der Praxis wird die Serotypisierung von RA jedoch dadurch erschwert, dass Referenzseren nur einer kleinen Zahl spezialisierter Labore zur Verfügung stehen. Die Verfügbarkeit eines Satzes kommerziell erhältlicher Anti-RA-Seren könnte hier Abhilfe schaffen. Da das angebotene kommerzielle System jedoch nicht auf Serotyp-Referenzstämmen basiert und die Bezeichnungen der Seren von der allgemein akzeptierten Nomenklatur für RA-Serotypen abweicht, kann es bei paralleler Anwendung beider Nomenklaturen zu Missverständnissen und Fehlinterpretationen kommen. Um eine bessere Vergleichbarkeit des kommerziellen Systems mit der RA-Serotyp- Nomenklatur zu erreichen, wurden im Rahmen dieser Studie RA-Serotyp-Referenzstämme und Feldisolate mit den kommerziellen Anti-RA-Seren getestet. Von den 14 kommerziellen Seren reagierten sechs Seren mit jeweils einem RA-Referenzstamm, vier Seren reagierten mit mehr als einem der getesteten Stämme, während die verbliebenen vier Seren keinen der getesteten Stämme agglutinierten. Diese Ergebnisse verdeutlichen, dass bei der Interpretation von Serotypisierung-Ergebnissen die Kenntnis über das verwendete System sowie dessen Besonderheiten von großer Bedeutung sind.
Die vorliegende Dissertation beschreibt die Isolation der neuen Riemerella -Spezies RCP sowie atypischer Isolate der Spezies RC aus Rachentupfern gesunder Tauben. Die Charakterisierung dieser neuen Vertreter des Genus Riemerella deckte Probleme in der sicheren biochemischen Abgrenzung gegenüber dem wirtschaftlich bedeutenden Geflügel-Pathogen RA auf. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass Spezies-Bestimmung mittels MALDI-TOF MS das Potential besitzt, dieses diagnostische Problem zu lösen. Darüber hinaus wurde ein neuer, RA-spezifischer PCR- Test etabliert und validiert, der sich zur Identifikation sowie zum raschen und sensitiven Nachweis von RA direkt aus diagnostischem Material eignet. Zusammengefasst tragen die Ergebnisse dieser Dissertation dazu bei, die Möglichkeiten der Diagnostik von Riemerella - Infektionen des Geflügels weiter zu verbessern. Summary / Zusammenfassung 100
Literature 101
10. Literature
Al Amri, A., Senok, A. C., Ismaeel, A. Y., Al-Mahmeed, A. E. & Botta, G. A. (2007). Multiplex PCR for direct identification of Campylobacter spp. in human and chicken stools. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 56 , 1350-1355. Alispahic, M., Christensen, H., Hess, C., Razzazi-Fazeli, E., Bisgaard, M. & Hess, M. (2012). MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry confirms clonal lineages of Gallibacterium anatis between chicken flocks. Veerinary Microbioly, doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.1005.1032. Andreasen, J. R. & Sandhu, T. (1993). Pasteurella anatipestifer -like bacteria associated with respiratory disease in pigeons. Avian Diseases, 37 , 908-911. Ash, W. J. (1967). Antibiotics and infectious serositis in white pekin ducklings. Avian Diseases, 11 , 38-41. Asplin, F. D. (1955). A septicaemic disease of ducklings. Veterinary Record, 67 , 854-858. Baba, T., Odagiri, Y., Morimoto, T., Horimoto, T. & Yamamoto, S. (1987). An outbreak of Moraxella ( Pasteurella ) anatipestifer infection in ducklings in Japan. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science, 49 , 939-941. Banda, A., Galloway-Haskins, R. I., Sandhu, T. S. & Schat, K. A. (2007). Genetic analysis of a duck circovirus detected in commercial Pekin ducks in New York. Avian Diseases, 51 , 90-95. Bangun, A., Tripathy, D. N. & Hanson, L. E. (1981). Studies of Pasteurella anatipestifer : an approach to its classification. Avian Diseases, 25 , 326-327. Bangun, A. & Tripathy, D. N. (1987). Taxonomy of Pasteurella anatipestifer .2. Cellular fatty- acid profile by gas-chromatography. Avian Diseases, 31 , 46-51. Behr, K.-P. (2007). Bakterielle Erreger von Atemwegsinfektionen bei Mastputen in Weser- Ems. In U. Neumann (Ed.). Proceedings of the 72. DVG-Fachgespräch Geflügelkrankheiten (pp. 20-31). Hannover, Germany Bendheim, U. & Even-Shoshan, A. (1975). Survival of Pasteurella multocida and Pasteurella anatipestifer in various natural media. Refuah Veterinarith, 32 , 40-46. Bendheim, U., Even-Shoshan, A., Baroutchieva, M. & Plesser, O. (1978). Pasteurella anatipestifer , a pathogenic agent in turkeys: etiology, epizootiology and pathogenicity. Literature 102
In (Ed.). Proceedings of the 16th World´s Poultry Congress (pp. 1461-1467). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Bernardet, J. F., Segers, P., Vancanneyt, M., Berthe, F., Kersters, K. & Vandamme, P. (1996). Cutting a gordian knot: Emended classification and description of the genus Flavobacterium , emended description of the family Flavobacteriaceae , and proposal of Flavobacterium hydatis nom nov (basonym, Cytophaga aquatilis Strohl and Tait 1978). International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 46 , 128-148. Bocklisch, H., Hühn, F., Herold, W., Tomaso, H., Diller, R. & Hotzel, H. (2011). Ostrich – a new avian host of Riemerella columbina . Veterinary Microbiology, 154, 429-431 Bruner, D. W., Angstrom, C. I. & Price, J. I. (1970). Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in pheasants. A case report. Cornell Veterinarian, 60 , 491-494. Campagnolo, E. R., Banerjee, M., Panigrahy, B. & Jones, R. L. (2001). An outbreak of duck viral enteritis (duck plague) in domestic muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata domesticus) in Illinois. Avian Diseases, 45 , 522-528. Charles, S. D., Nagaraja, K. V., Halvorson, D. A. & Rao, A. (1991). A retrospective analysis on the epizootiological aspects of outbreaks of Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in turkeys in Minnesota. Poultry Science, 70 , 1704-1708. Charles, S. D., Nagaraja, K. V., Halvorson, D. A. & Barnes, D. M. (1993). Influence of Newcastle disease virus on the severity of Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in turkeys. Research in Veterinary Science, 55 , 209-214. Christensen, H. & Bisgaard, M. (2010). Phylogenetic relationships of Riemerella anatipestifer serovars and related taxa and an evaluation of specific PCR tests reported for R. anatipestifer . Journal of Applied Microbiology, 108 , 1612-1619. Cooper, G. L. (1989). Pasteurella anatipestifer infections in California turkey flocks: Circumstantial evidence of a mosquito vector. Avian Diseases, 33 , 809-815. Cooper, G. L. & Charlton, B. R. (1992). Spondylitis in turkeys associated with experimental Pasteurella anatipestifer infection. Avian Diseases, 36 , 290-295. Crasta, K. C., Chua, K. L., Subramaniam, S., Frey, J., Loh, H. & Tan, H. M. (2002). Identification and characterization of CAMP cohemolysin as a potential virulence factor of Riemerella anatipestifer . Journal of Bacteriology, 184 , 1932-1939. de Freitas, C. G., Santana, A. P., da Silva, P. H., Goncalves, V. S., Barros Mde, A., Torres, F. A., Murata, L. S. & Perecmanis, S. (2010). PCR multiplex for detection of Salmonella Literature 103
Enteritidis, Typhi and Typhimurium and occurrence in poultry meat. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 139 , 15-22. Donahue, J. M. & Olson, L. D. (1969). Survey of wild ducks and geese for Pasteurella spp . Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 5, 201-205. Dubois, D., Leyssene, D., Chacornac, J. P., Kostrzewa, M., Schmit, P. O., Talon, R., Bonnet, R. & Delmas, J. (2010). Identification of a variety of Staphylococcus species by matrix- assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 48 , 941-945. Eleazer, T. H., Blalock, H. G., Harrell, J. S. & Derieux, W. T. (1973). Pasteurella anatipestifer as a cause of mortality in semiwild pen-raised mallard ducks in South Carolina - Case report. Avian Diseases, 17 , 855-857. Floren, U., Wiedeking, B., Kissel, B. & Kaleta, E. F. (1987). Pasteurella anatipestifer infection of waterfowl - part 1. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 94 , 525-534. Floren, U., Storm, P. K. & Kaleta, E. F. (1988). [ Pasteurella anatipestifer sp.i.c. in Pekin ducks: pathogenicity tests and immunization with an inactivated, homologous, monovalent (serotype 6/B) oil emulsion vaccine]. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 95 , 210- 214. Frommer, A., Bock, R., Inbar, A. & Zemer, S. (1990). Muscovy ducks as a source of Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in turkey flocks. Avian Pathology, 19 , 161-163. Glünder, G. & Hinz, K. H. (1989). Isolation of Moraxella anatipestifer from embryonated goose eggs. Avian Pathology, 18, 351-355. Graham, R., Brandly, C. A. & Dunlap, G. L. (1938). Studies on duck septicemia. The Cornell Veterinarian, 28 , 1-8. Hatfield, R. M., Morris, B. A. & Henry, R. R. (1987). Development of an enzyme-linked- immunosorbent-assay for the detection of humoral antibody to Pasteurella anatipestifer . Avian Pathology, 16 , 123-140. Hatfield, R. M. & Morris, B. A. (1988). Influence of the route of infection of Pasteurella anatipestifer on the clinical and immune-responses of white Pekin ducks. Research in Veterinary Science, 44 , 208-214. Hendrickson, J. M. & Hilbert, K. F. (1932). A new and serious septicemic disease of young ducks with a description of the causative organism, Pfeifferella anatipestifer , n. s. The Cornell Veterinarian, 22 , 239-252. Literature 104
Higgins, D. A., Henry, R. R. & Kounev, Z. V. (2000). Duck immune responses to Riemerella anatipestifer vaccines. Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 24 , 153-167. Hinz, K. H., Ryll, M. & Glünder, G. (1994). Riemerella anatipestifer -like bacteria from pigeons with respiratory disease. In J. Kösters (Ed.). Proceedings of the IX. DVG-Tagung über Vogelkrankheiten (pp. 245-248). Munich, Germany Hinz, K. H., Ryll, M. & Kohler, B. (1998a). Detection of acid production from carbohydrates by Riemerella anatipestifer and related organisms using the buffered single substrate test. Veterinary Microbiology, 60 , 277-284. Hinz, K. H., Ryll, M., Köhler, B. & Glünder, G. (1998b). Phenotypic characteristics of Riemerella anatipestifer and similar micro-organisms from various hosts. Avian Pathology, 27 , 33-42. Hu, Q., Han, X., Zhou, X., Ding, S., Ding, C. & Yu, S. (2010). Characterization of biofilm formation by Riemerella anatipestifer . Veterinary Microbiology . Hu, Q., Han, X., Zhou, X., Ding, C., Zhu, Y. & Yu, S. (2011a). OmpA is a virulence factor of Riemerella anatipestifer . Veterinary Microbiology, 150, 278-283 Hu, Q., Tu, J., Han, X., Zhu, Y., Ding, C. & Yu, S. (2011b). Development of multiplex PCR assay for rapid detection of Riemerella anatipestifer , Escherichia coli , and Salmonella enterica simultaneously from ducks. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 87 , 64-69. Huang, B., Subramaniam, S., Chua, K. L., Kwang, J., Loh, H., Frey, J. & Tan, H. M. (1999). Molecular fingerprinting of Riemerella anatipestifer by repetitive sequence PCR. Veterinary Microbiology, 67 , 213-219. Huang, B., Kwang, J., Loh, H., Frey, J., Tan, H. M. & Chua, K. L. (2002a). Development of an ELISA using a recombinant 41 kDa partial protein (P45N') for the detection of Riemerella anatipestifer infections in ducks. Veterinary Microbiology, 88 , 339-349. Huang, B., Subramaniam, S., Frey, J., Loh, H., Tan, H. M., Fernandez, C. J., Kwang, J. & Chua, K. L. (2002b). Vaccination of ducks with recombinant outer membrane protein ( OmpA ) and a 41 kDa partial protein (P45N') of Riemerella anatipestifer . Veterinary Microbiology, 84 , 219-230. Jortner, B. S., Porro, R. & Leibovit.L (1969). Central nervous system lesions of spontaneous Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in ducklings. Avian Diseases, 13 , 27-35. Literature 105
Kardos, G., Nagy, J., Antal, M., Bistyak, A., Tenk, M. & Kiss, I. (2007). Development of a novel PCR assay specific for Riemerella anatipestifer . Letters in Applied Microbiology, 44 , 145-148. Karstad, L., Lusis, P. & Long, J. R. (1970). Pasteurella anatipestifer as a cause of mortality in captive wild waterfowl. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 6, 408-413. Köhler, B. (1995). Diagnostic and therapy of infectious serositis ( Pasteurella anatipestifer ) with consideration of immunoprophylaxis. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl (pp. 148-160). Halle (Saale), Germany Köhler, B., Bötticher, R. & Hinz, K. H. (1997). Investigations about occurrence of serotypes of Riemerella anatipestifer with special reference to waterfowl in Germany and Thailand. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl (pp. 170-179). Nantes, France Lambert, M. A. & Moss, C. W. (1984). Cellular fatty acid compositions of Moraxella anatipestifer and Legionella pneumophila . International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 34 , 490-491. Layton, H. W. & Sandhu, T. S. (1984). Protection of ducklings with a broth-grown Pasteurella anatipestifer bacterin. Avian Diseases, 28 , 718-726. Lobbedey, L. & Schlatterer, B. (2003). Development and application of an ELISA for the detection of duck antibodies against Riemerella anatipestifer antigens in egg yolk of vaccinees and in serum of their offspring. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B: Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health, 50 , 81-85. Marshall, J. D., Jr., Hansen, P. A. & Eveland, W. C. (1961). Histobacteriology of the genus Pasteurella. I. Pasteurella anatipestifer . Cornell Veterinarian, 51 , 24-34. Mellmann, A., Cloud, J., Maier, T., Keckevoet, U., Ramminger, I., Iwen, P., Dunn, J., Hall, G., Wilson, D., Lasala, P., Kostrzewa, M. & Harmsen, D. (2008). Evaluation of matrix- assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry in comparison to 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species identification of nonfermenting bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 46 , 1946-1954. Metzner, M., Köhler-Repp, D. & Köhler, B. (2008). Riemerella anatipestifer infections in turkey and other poultry. In H. M. Hafez (Ed.). Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Turkey Diseases (pp. 117-122). Berlin, Germany Literature 106
Mitrovic, M., Schildknecht, E. G., Maestrone, G. & Luther, H. G. (1980). Rofenaid in the control of Pasteurella anatipestifer and Escherichia coli infections in ducklings. Avian Diseases, 24 , 302-308. Munday, B. L., Corbould, A., Heddleston, K. L. & Harry, E. G. (1970). Isolation of Pasteurella anatipestifer from black swan (Cygnus atratus). Australian Veterinary Journal, 46 , 322- 325. Murray, P. R. (2010). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: usefulness for taxonomy and epidemiology. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 16 , 1626-1630. Pan, C. Y., Chow, T. Y., Yu, C. Y., Yu, C. Y., Chen, J. C. & Chen, J. Y. (2010). Antimicrobial peptides of an anti-lipopolysaccharide factor, epinecidin-1, and hepcidin reduce the lethality of Riemerella anatipestifer sepsis in ducks. Peptides, 31 , 806-815. Pascucci, S., Giovannetti, L. & Massi, P. (1990). [Characteristics of Pasteurella anatipestifer strains isolated in Italy]. Zootecnica International, 50-53. Pathanasophon, P., Tanticharoenyos, T. & Sawada, T. (1994). Physiological characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility and serotypes of Pasteurella anatipestifer isolated from ducks in Thailand. Veterinary Microbiology, 39 , 179-185. Pathanasophon, P., Sawada, T., Pramoolsinsap, T. & Tanticharoenyos, T. (1996). Immunogenicity of Riemerella anatipestifer broth culture bacterin and cell-free culture filtrate in ducks. Avian Pathology, 25 , 705-719. Pathanasophon, P., Phuektes, P., Tanticharoenyos, T., Narongsak, W. & Sawada, T. (2002). A potential new serotype of Riemerella anatipestifer isolated from ducks in Thailand. Avian Pathology, 31 , 267-270. Pickrell, J. A. (1966). Pathologic changes associated with experimental Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in ducklings. Avian Diseases, 10 , 281-288. Pierce, R. L. & Vorhies, M. W. (1973). Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in geese - Case report. Avian Diseases, 17 , 868-870. Riemer, O. (1904). Short communication about an exudative septicaemia observed in geese and its causative agent. Zentralblatt Bakteriologie Originale, 37 , 641-648. Rimler, R. B. & Nordholm, G. E. (1998). DNA fingerprinting of Riemerella anatipestifer . Avian Diseases, 42 , 101-105. Literature 107
Rimler, R. B., Sandhu, T. S. & Glisson, J. R. (1998) Riemerella anatipestifer infection. A Laboratory Manual for the Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens 4th edn (pp. 22-23) Tallahassee, Florida (US): The American Association of Avian Pathologists (AAAP). Rosenfeld, L. E. (1973). Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in fowls in Australia. Australian Veterinary Journal, 49 , 55-56. Rubbenstroth, D., Ryll, M., Behr, K. P. & Rautenschlein, S. (2009). Pathogenesis of Riemerella anatipestifer in turkeys after experimental mono-infection via respiratory routes or dual infection together with the avian metapneumovirus. Avian Pathology, 38 , 497-507. Ryll, M. & Hinz, K. H. (2000). Exclusion of strain 670/89 as type strain for serovar 20 of Riemerella anatipestifer . Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 113 , 65- 66. Ryll, M., Christensen, H., Bisgaard, M., Christensen, J. P., Hinz, K. H. & Kohler, B. (2001). Studies on the prevalence of Riemerella anatipestifer in the upper respiratory tract of clinically healthy ducklings and characterization of untypable strains. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B: Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health, 48 , 537-546. Sandhu, T. S. (1979). Immunization of white Pekin ducklings against Pasteurella anatipestifer infection. Avian Diseases, 23 , 662-669. Sandhu, T. S. & Dean, W. F. (1980). Effect of chemotherapeutic agents on Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in white Pekin ducklings. Poultry Science, 59 , 1027-1030. Sandhu, T. S. & Layton, H. W. (1985). Laboratory and field trials with formalin-inactivated Escherichia coli (O78) Pasteurella anatipestifer bacterin in white Pekin ducks. Avian Diseases, 29 , 128-135. Sandhu, T. S. (1991). Immunogenicity and safety of a live Pasteurella anatipestifer vaccine in white Pekin ducklings - Laboratory and field trials. Avian Pathology, 20 , 423-432. Sandhu, T. S. & Leister, M. L. (1991). Serotypes of Pasteurella anatipestifer isolates from poultry in different countries. Avian Pathology, 20 , 233-239. Sandhu, T. S. (2003) Riemerella anatipestifer infection. In Y. M. Saif. Diseases of Poultry 11th edn (pp. 676-682): Iowa State Press. Literature 108
Sarver, C. F., Morishita, T. Y. & Nersessian, B. (2005). The effect of route of inoculation and challenge dosage on Riemerella anatipestifer infection in Pekin ducks ( Anas platyrhynchos ). Avian Diseases, 49 , 104-107. Segers, P., Mannheim, W., Vancanneyt, M., Debrandt, K., Hinz, K. H., Kersters, K. & Vandamme, P. (1993). Riemerella anatipestifer gen. nov., comb. nov., the causative agent of septicemia anserum exsudativa, and its phylogenetic affiliation within the Flavobacterium-Cytophaga rRNA homology group. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 43 , 768-776. Shawky, S., Sandhu, T. & Shivaprasad, H. L. (2000). Pathogenicity of a low-virulence duck virus enteritis isolate with apparent immunosuppressive ability. Avian Diseases, 44 , 590-599. Singh, R., Teo, T. P., Tay, Y. H. & Ong, L. S. K. (1989). Biochemical characteristics and drug sensitivity of Pasteurella anatipestifer isolates from Singapore ducks. Singapore Journal of Primary Industries, 17 , 59-62. Smith, J. M., Frame, D. D., Cooper, G., Bickford, A. A., Ghazikhanian, G. Y. & Kelly, B. J. (1987). Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in commercial meat-type turkeys in California. Avian Diseases, 31 , 913-917. Soike, D., Kohler, B. & Albrecht, K. (1999). A circovirus-like infection in geese related to a runting syndrome. Avian Pathology, 28 , 199-202. Soike, D., Hattermann, K., Albrecht, K., Segales, J., Domingo, M., Schmitt, C. & Mankertz, A. (2001). A diagnostic study on columbid circovirus infection. Avian Pathology, 30 , 605- 611. Subramaniam, S., Chua, K. L., Tan, H. M., Loh, H., Kuhnert, P. & Frey, J. (1997). Phylogenetic position of Riemerella anatipestifer based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 47 , 562-565. Subramaniam, S., Huang, B., Loh, H., Kwang, J., Tan, H. M., Chua, K. L. & Frey, J. (2000). Characterization of a predominant immunogenic outer membrane protein of Riemerella anatipestifer . Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 7, 168-174. Sugimoto, C., Miyagawa, E., Nakazawa, M., Mitani, K. & Isayama, Y. (1983). Cellular fatty acid composition comparison of Haemophilus equigenitalis and Moraxella species. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 33 , 181-187. Literature 109
Talan, D. A., Citron, D. M., Abrahamian, F. M., Moran, G. J., Goldstein, E. J. C. & Grp, E. M. A. B. I. S. (1999). Bacteriologic analysis of infected dog and cat bites. New England Journal of Medicine, 340 , 85-92. Tsai, H. J., Liu, Y. T., Tseng, C. S. & Pan, M. J. (2005). Genetic variation of the ompA and 16S rRNA genes of Riemerella anatipestifer . Avian Pathology, 34 , 55-64. Turbahn, A., De Jackel, S. C., Greuel, E., De Jong, A., Froyman, R. & Kaleta, E. F. (1997). Dose response study of enrofloxacin against Riemerella anatipestifer septicaemia in Muscovy and Pekin ducklings. Avian Pathology, 26 , 791-802. Vancanneyt, M., Segers, P., Hauben, L., Hommez, J., Devriese, L. A., Hoste, B., Vandamme, P. & Kersters, K. (1994). Flavobacterium meningosepticum , a pathogen in birds. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 32 , 2398-2403. Vancanneyt, M., Vandamme, P., Segers, P., Torck, U., Coopman, R., Kersters, K. & Hinz, K. H. (1999). Riemerella columbina sp. nov., a bacterium associated with respiratory disease in pigeons. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 49 , 289-295. Vandamme, P., Segers, P., Ryll, M., Hommez, J., Vancanneyt, M., Coopman, R., De Baere, R., Van De Peer, Y., Kersters, K., De Wachter, R. & Hinz, K. H. (1998). Pelistega europaea gen. nov., sp. nov., a bacterium associated with respiratory disease in pigeons: taxonomic structure and phylogenetic allocation. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 48 , 431-440. Vandamme, P., Vancanneyt, M., Segers, P., Ryll, M., Kohler, B., Ludwig, W. & Hinz, K. H. (1999). Coenonia anatina gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel bacterium associated with respiratory disease in ducks and geese. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 49 , 867-874. Wesley, I. V., Harmon, K. M., Dickson, J. S. & Schwartz, A. R. (2002). Application of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for the simultaneous confirmation of Listeria monocytogenes and other Listeria species in turkey sample surveillance. Journal of Food Protection, 65 , 780-785. Wobeser, G. & Ward, G. E. (1974). Pasteurella anatipestifer infection in migrating whistling swans. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 10 , 466-470. Wolters, M., Rohde, H., Maier, T., Belmar-Campos, C., Franke, G., Scherpe, S., Aepfelbacher, M. & Christner, M. (2011). MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting allows for discrimination Literature 110
of major methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineages. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 301 , 64-68. Yu, C. Y., Liu, Y. W., Chou, S. J., Chao, M. R., Weng, B. C., Tsay, J. G., Chiu, C. H., Wu, C. C., Lin, T. L., Chang, C. C. & Chu, C. (2008). Genomic diversity and molecular differentiation of Riemerella anatipestifer associated with eight outbreaks in five farms. Avian Pathology, 37 , 273-279.
Literature 111
Acknowledgements
I like to thank Prof. Silke Rautenschlein (Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover) for her expert supervision and the helpful contribution to the manuscripts.
Dr. Martin Ryll (Clinic for Poultry) helped to initiate the Riemerella project and gave me the opportunity to complete this work in his lab.
I am particularly grateful to Rita Leise (Clinic for Poultry) for her technical expertise and her friendly help throughout this project, especially in the more than two years after I had left Hannover. Without her this work would not have been completed, yet.
Prof. Johannes Knobloch (Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Lübeck) gave me a helpful introduction into the use of MALDI-TOF MS bacterial fingerprinting and his analyses provided valuable contribution to the work of this thesis. Our cooperation was a real pleasure for me. I also like to thank his technician Justyna Bimschas for her technical assistance.
Dr. Helmut Hotzel (Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, FLI Jena), Prof. Magne Bisgaard and Prof. Henrik Christensen (Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen) provided Riemerella sequences and phylogenetic analyses. In addition, Henrik Christensen´s experience with the mysteries of bacterial taxonomy offered an invaluable help for the preparation of the manuscript describing the new species Riemerella columbipharyngis .
I also like to thank Prof. Karl-Heinz Hinz (Clinic for Poultry) for helpful advice for the project and valuable discussions of the project.
Dr. Bernd Köhler (Ripac Labor GmbH, Potsdam) performed serotyping of some of our Riemerella isolates and kindly provided additional isolates from his own collection.
Further Riemerella isolates and diagnostic samples were provided by several colleagues, veterinary practitioners and diagnostic laboratories, namely by Lydia Teske and Dr. Arne Jung (Clinic for Poultry), Anicon Labor GmbH (Höltinghausen), Dr. Daniel Brandt (Dortmund), Literature 112
Tierärztliche Praxis am Bergweg (Lohne), and Dr. Herrmann Block (Uelsen). I also like to thank all pigeon breeders, who allowed me to collect samples from their lofts.
I like to thank all my colleagues from the Clinic for Poultry and from the Department of Virology (University of Freiburg) for the pleasant working atmosphere, which I thoroughly enjoyed.
In particular I like to thank my family, who were always there to support me throughout the last years.