First Record of Monocorophium Uenoi (Stephenson, 1932) (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Corophiidae) in the Bay of Biscay, French Atlantic Coast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Record of Monocorophium Uenoi (Stephenson, 1932) (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Corophiidae) in the Bay of Biscay, French Atlantic Coast BioInvasions Records (2019) Volume 8, Issue 1: 87–95 CORRECTED PROOF Rapid Communication First record of Monocorophium uenoi (Stephenson, 1932) (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Corophiidae) in the Bay of Biscay, French Atlantic coast Benoit Gouillieux1,* and Cécile Massé2 1Université de Bordeaux, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 rue du Professeur Jolyet, 33120 Arcachon, France 2UMS 2006 AFB-MNHN-CNRS Patrimoine Naturel, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 rue du Professeur Jolyet, 33120 Arcachon, France Author e-mails: [email protected] (BG), [email protected] (CM) *Corresponding author Citation: Gouillieux B, Massé C (2019) First record of Monocorophium uenoi Abstract (Stephenson, 1932) (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Corophiidae) in the Bay of The non-indigenous amphipod Monocorophium uenoi was recorded for the first Biscay, French Atlantic coast. time on the French Atlantic coast. This species has been collected in Arcachon Bay BioInvasions Records 8(1): 87–95, and Bidasoa Estuary as early as 2007, probably introduced with non-native oysters. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2019.8.1.09 A summary on its morphological characters and its current distribution is done, and Received: 30 April 2018 an updated identification key to Monocorophium species for European waters is Accepted: 16 October 2018 provided. Published: 12 February 2019 Key words: non-indigenous species, Peracarida, Corophiini, Arcachon Bay, Bidasoa Thematic editor: Cynthia McKenzie Estuary, Pacific oyster Copyright: © Gouillieux and Massé This is an open access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Introduction (Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0). OPEN ACCESS. The genus Monocorophium Bousfield and Hoover, 1997 is represented by 4 species in European waters: M. acherusicum (Costa, 1853), M. insidiosum (Crawford, 1937), M. sextonae (Crawford, 1937) and M. uenoi (Stephenson, 1932) (Lincoln 1979; Bousfield and Hoover 1997; Faasse 2014). These species are native from European waters, except M. uenoi native from Japan, and M. sextonae which may have a South-West Pacific origin for some authors (Goulletquer et al. 2002). M. uenoi was recorded in The Netherlands in 2013 (Faasse 2014) – the first report from European waters. The present paper deals with M. uenoi record from the French Atlantic coast, which precedes the previous record. Materials and methods Study area (Figure 1) Arcachon Bay is a 180 km² macrotidal coastal lagoon, connected to the Atlantic Ocean by a narrow channel and receives freshwater from Leyre River. The lagoon is characterized by large intertidal flats (115 km²) (Plus et al. 2010). Farms rearing the Pacific oyster Magallana gigas (Thunberg, 1793) occupy the deeper intertidal. Between 2007 and 2017, water temperature Gouillieux and Massé (2019), BioInvasions Records 8(1): 87–95, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2019.8.1.09 87 First record of Monocorophium uenoi in the Bay of Biscay Figure 1. Locations in Europe with records of Monocorophium uenoi. NL: The Netherlands. AB: Arcachon Bay. BE: Bidasoa Estuary. Black spot: Faasse 2014. Red stars: present study. ranged from 4 to 25 °C and salinity ranged from 21 to 36 with an average of 16 ± 4 °C and 33 ± 2 (mean ± SD) respectively. Bidasoa Estuary represents the border between France and Spain in the South East of the Bay of Biscay. It is a short estuary with some feral oyster reefs. No shellfish or commercial port are present. Water temperature ranged from 12 to 22 °C and salinity ranged from 13 to 35 ppt with an average of 17 ± 4 °C and 31 ± 5 (mean ± SD) respectively. Environmental data (temperature and salinity) for both Arcachon Bay and Bidasoa Estuary were provided by the SOMLIT (Sevice d’Observation en Milieu LITtoral, a French coastal monitoring network: http://somlit. epoc.u-bordeaux1.fr/fr/). Material examined Monocorophium uenoi was collected during benthic surveys, in Arcachon Bay and Bidasoa Estuary (Figure 1, Table 1). Specimens were examined with a Nikon SMZ 1500 stereomicroscope and a Nikon Eclipse E400 microscope with up to 112,5 and 400x magnifications (and transmitted light) respectively. Body length (BL) was measured with NIS-Elements Gouillieux and Massé (2019), BioInvasions Records 8(1): 87–95, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2019.8.1.09 88 First record of Monocorophium uenoi in the Bay of Biscay Table 1. Sampling details. N = number of specimens of Monocorophium uenoi collected in Pacific oyster reef. Site Station Latitude Longitude Date N MNHN depository MNHN-IU-2016-3430 Arcachon Bay Les Hosses 44.666667 −1.166667 May 2007–June 2008 135* (25 specimens) – Jacquet 44.666667 −1.083333 July 2014 26 – Arguin 44.583333 −1.233333 December 2017 6 – La Nègue 44.666667 −1.133333 September 2015 1 MNHN-IU-2016-3429 – Ile aux oiseaux Nord 44.683333 −1.166667 September 2015 20 (5 specimens) MNHN-IU-2016-3428 Bidasoa Estuary Station nautique 43.366667 −1.766667 October 2015 50 (20 specimens) * Specimens collected during Salvo (2010) thesis. Analysis software from the anterior margin of head to the posterior end of telson. For Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) studies, specimens were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, critical point dried, sputter coated with gold and examined with a Hitachi TM3030Plus scanning electron microscope. Some specimens were deposited in the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN, Paris) (Table 1). Results Out of 238 specimens of Monocorophium uenoi collected, 72% were females, including ovigerous individuals, and 28% were males. Both in Arcachon Bay and Bidasoa Estuary, specimens were all collected in oyster reefs (Magallana gigas) between May 2007 and December 2017 (see Table 1). Diagnose of male Monocorophium uenoi from Arcachon Bay (SW France) (Figure 2) Rostrum short, projecting slightly beyond lateral head lobes. Antenna 1 peduncle article 1 without lateral and with 3 ventral robust setae, without ventromedial process. Antenna 2 peduncle article 3 without robust seta; article 4 with 1 ventromedial robust seta and distoventral bidentate tooth; article 5 without robust seta, with 1 proximoventral and 1 distomedial process. Gnathopod 1 dactylus longer than palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 dactylus with 3 ventral teeth (tip of dactylus not counted as tooth). Urosome segment 1–3 fused. Uropod 1 inserted mainly laterally from lateral notches; peduncle with 1 distomedial robust seta. Uropod 2 inner ramus outer margin bare. Telson with 3 proximolateral setae and with 2 row of 4 robust setae tooth-like on the dorsodistal depression. Female Sexually dimorphic characters based on adult females, Arcachon Bay (SW France), (Figure 3A–C). Rostrum shorter, not exceeding lateral head lobes. Antenna 1 peduncle article 1 with 1 lateral robust seta. Antenna 2 peduncle article 3 with 1 pair of robust setae; article 4 with row of 3 single robust setae, without Gouillieux and Massé (2019), BioInvasions Records 8(1): 87–95, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2019.8.1.09 89 First record of Monocorophium uenoi in the Bay of Biscay distoventral tooth; article 5 without proximoventral process and with 1 ventromedial robust seta. Figure 2. Monocorophium uenoi (Stephensen, 1932), males specimens from Jacquet, Arcachon Bay, July 2014. A) Head and antenna dorsal view; B) antenna 1 article 1 mesial view; C) antenna 2 mesial view with article 4 proximal ventromedial robust seta (black arrow); D) antenna 2 article 4 distoventral teeth and article 5 proximal ventral process (black arrow); E–G) gnathopod 2 distal part of propodus and dactylus showing variability in dactylus teeth; H) gnathopod 1 distal part of propodus and dactylus; I) uropod 1 and 2 dorsal view; J) telson dorsal view. Scale bars: A–C, I: 0.2 mm; D–H, J: 0.05 mm. Photomicrographs by B. Gouillieux. Gouillieux and Massé (2019), BioInvasions Records 8(1): 87–95, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2019.8.1.09 90 First record of Monocorophium uenoi in the Bay of Biscay Figure 3. Monocorophium uenoi (Stephensen, 1932), females specimens from Jacquet, Arcachon Bay, July 2014; A) antenna 1 article 1 mesial view; B) antenna 2 mesial view; C) urosome dorsal view. Monocorophium acherusicum (Costa, 1853), specimens from Arcachon Bay; D) male antenna 1 article 1 mesial view; E) male antenna 2 mesial view; F) female antenna 2 mesial view; G) uropod 1 dorsal view. Monocorophium insidiosum (Crawford, 1937), male specimens from Bidasoa Estuary; H) head and antenna dorsal view showing medial process on antenna 1 article 1 (black arrow). Monocorophium sextonae (Crawford, 1937), male specimen from Arcachon Bay; I) antenna 1 article 1 mesial view; J) antenna 2 mesial view. Scale bars: A, D: 0.1 mm; B, C, E–J: 0.2 mm. Photomicrographs by B. Gouillieux. Variability Based on 60 specimens from Arcachon Bay and Bidasoa Estuary (BL range: 1.7–6.2 mm). Antenna 1 peduncle article 1 with 0–2 (7%) or 3–4 (93%) ventral robust setae. Antenna 2 peduncle article 4 with (80%) or without (20%) ventromedial Gouillieux and Massé (2019), BioInvasions Records 8(1): 87–95, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2019.8.1.09 91 First record of Monocorophium uenoi in the Bay of Biscay robust setae. Gnathopod 2 dactylus with 2 (13%) or 3 (74%) teeth, or with no left/right symmetry (13%), third tooth sometimes difficult to see (Figure 2F). Number of robust setae on antenna 1 peduncle article 1 or number of gnathopod 2 dactylus teeth not significantly correlated to body length (Spearman, ρ = 0.22; p-value = 0.1) Discussion Description of Monocorophium uenoi Monocorophium uenoi present specimens correspond to Stephenson (1932) and subsequent descriptions except for: (1) female antenna 1 article 1 with 1 medial robust seta (versus 4 or 5 for Nagata 1960); (2) female antenna 2 article 3 with 2 robust setae (versus 3 for Barnard 1952); (3) male antenna 2 peduncle article 5 with proximoventral process (versus without for Stephensen 1932 and Nagata 1960; with or without for Barnard 1952); (4) gnathopod 2 dactylus with 2 or 3 posterior teeth (versus 3 or 4 for Faasse 2014); (5) telson with 3 proximolateral setae and with 2 row of 4 robust setae tooth-like on the dorsodistal depression (versus 1 pair of proximolateral setae and 2 row of 3 robust setae tooth-like for Stephensen 1932).
Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • HELCOM Red List
    SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Corophium multisetosum English name: Scientific name: – Corophium multisetosum Taxonomical group: Species authority: Class: Malacostraca Stock, 1952 Order: Amphipoda Family: Corophiidae Subspecies, Variations, Synonyms: Generation length: 2 years? Trophonopsis truncata Strøm, 1768 Trophon truncatus Strøm, 1768 Past and current threats (Habitats Directive Future threats (Habitats Directive article 17 article 17 codes): Fishing (bottom trawling; codes): Fishing (bottom trawling; F02.02.01), F02.02.01), Eutrophication (H01.05) Eutrophication (H01.05) IUCN Criteria: HELCOM Red List NT B2b Category: Near Threatened Global / European IUCN Red List Category Habitats Directive: – – Protection and Red List status in HELCOM countries: Denmark –/–, Estonia –/–, Finland –/–, Germany –/G (endangered by unknown extent), Latvia –/–, Lithuania –/–-, Poland –/–, Russia –/–, Sweden: –/– Distribution and status in the Baltic Sea region C. multisetosum is reported mainly from coastal waters (bays) along southern shores of the Baltic Sea and those in the Danish straits, including adjacent fjords, canals, lagoons, e.g. the Curonian Lagoon, which is the easternmost area. However, there are also records from more open sea, and thus more saline areas such as the Hevring Bay, Arhus Bay, Arkona Basin by Darss-Zingst Peninsula, and the outer Puck Bay. Declining population trends are reported from the Szczecin Lagoon (Wawrzyniak-Wydrowska, pers. comm.). ©HELCOM Red List Benthic Invertebrate Expert Group 2013 www.helcom.fi > Baltic Sea trends > Biodiversity > Red List of species SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Corophium multisetosum Distribution map The georeferenced records of species compiled from the Danish national database for marine data (MADS), Russian monitoring data (Elena Ezhova, pers. comm), and the database of the Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW), where also the Polish literature and monitoring data for the species are stored.
    [Show full text]
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REVIEW of ECOLOGICAL and GENETIC RESEARCH of PONTO-CASPIAN GOBIES (Pisces, Gobiidae) in EUROPE
    Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 2016, 74, 110-123 G. Jakšić et al: Ecological and genetic research of Ponto-Caspian gobies DOI: 10.1515/cjf-2016-0015 CODEN RIBAEG ISSN 1330-061X (print), 1848-0586 (online) THE REVIEW OF ECOLOGICAL AND GENETIC RESEARCH OF PONTO-CASPIAN GOBIES (Pisces, Gobiidae) IN EUROPE Goran Jakšić1, *, Margita Jadan2, Marina Piria3 1City of Karlovac, Banjavčićeva 9, 47000 Karlovac, Croatia 2Division of materials chemistry, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Fisheries, Beekeeping, Game management and Special Zoology, Svetošimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia *Corresponding Author, Email: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received: 27 January 2016 Invasive Ponto-Caspian gobies (monkey goby Neogobius fluviatilis, round Received in revised form: 14 May 2016 goby Neogobius melanostomus and bighead goby Ponticola kessleri) have Accepted: 20 May 2016 recently caused dramatic changes in fish assemblage structure throughout Available online: 24 May 2016 European river systems. This review provides summary of recent research on their dietary habits, age and growth, phylogenetic lineages and gene diversity. The principal food of all three species is invertebrates, and more rarely fish, which depends on the type of habitat, part of the year, as well as the morphological characteristics of species. According to the von Bertalanffy growth model, size at age is specific for the region, but due to its disadvantages it is necessary to test other growth models. Phylogenetic Keywords: analysis of monkey goby and round goby indicates separation between the European river systems Black Sea and the Caspian Sea haplotypes. The greatest genetic diversity is Invasive gobies found among populations of the Black Sea, and the lowest among European Ecology invaders.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioturbation Classification of European Marine Infaunal
    A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates Ana M. Queiros 1, Silvana N. R. Birchenough2, Julie Bremner2, Jasmin A. Godbold3, Ruth E. Parker2, Alicia Romero-Ramirez4, Henning Reiss5,6, Martin Solan3, Paul J. Somerfield1, Carl Van Colen7, Gert Van Hoey8 & Stephen Widdicombe1 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, U.K. 2The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, U.K. 3Department of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K. 4EPOC – UMR5805, Universite Bordeaux 1- CNRS, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 Rue du Professeur Jolyet, Arcachon 33120, France 5Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Postboks 1490, Bodø 8049, Norway 6Department for Marine Research, Senckenberg Gesellschaft fu¨ r Naturforschung, Su¨ dstrand 40, Wilhelmshaven 26382, Germany 7Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, Ghent 9000, Belgium 8Bio-Environmental Research Group, Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO-Fisheries), Ankerstraat 1, Ostend 8400, Belgium Keywords Abstract Biodiversity, biogeochemical, ecosystem function, functional group, good Bioturbation, the biogenic modification of sediments through particle rework- environmental status, Marine Strategy ing and burrow ventilation, is a key mediator of many important geochemical Framework Directive, process, trait. processes in marine systems. In situ quantification of bioturbation can be achieved in a myriad of ways, requiring expert knowledge, technology, and Correspondence resources not always available, and not feasible in some settings. Where dedi- Ana M. Queiros, Plymouth Marine cated research programmes do not exist, a practical alternative is the adoption Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Round Goby (Neogobius Melanostomus):A Review of European and North American Literature
    ILLINOI S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007. CI u/l Natural History Survey cF Library (/4(I) ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY OT TSrX O IJX6V E• The Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus):A Review of European and North American Literature with notes from the Round Goby Conference, Chicago, 1996 Center for Aquatic Ecology J. Ei!en Marsden, Patrice Charlebois', Kirby Wolfe Illinois Natural History Survey and 'Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Lake Michigan Biological Station 400 17th St., Zion IL 60099 David Jude University of Michigan, Great Lakes Research Division 3107 Institute of Science & Technology Ann Arbor MI 48109 and Svetlana Rudnicka Institute of Fisheries Varna, Bulgaria Illinois Natural History Survey Lake Michigan Biological Station 400 17th Sti Zion, Illinois 6 Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 96/10 The Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus): A Review of European and North American Literature with Notes from the Round Goby Conference, Chicago, 1996 J. Ellen Marsden, Patrice Charlebois1, Kirby Wolfe Illinois Natural History Survey and 'Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Lake Michigan Biological Station 400 17th St., Zion IL 60099 David Jude University of Michigan, Great Lakes Research Division 3107 Institute of Science & Technology Ann Arbor MI 48109 and Svetlana Rudnicka Institute of Fisheries Varna, Bulgaria The Round Goby Conference, held on Feb. 21-22, 1996, was sponsored by the Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Program, and organized by the
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Impact of the Exotic Amphipod,Corophium Curvispinum
    Ecology and impact of the exotic amphipod, Corophium curvispinum Sars, 1895 (Crustacea: Amphipoda), in the River Rhine and Meuse S. Rajagopal, G. van der Velde, B.G.P. Paffen and A. bij de Vaate Reports ofth e project "Ecological Rehabilitation of Rivers Rhine and Meuse" No.75-1998 Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment (RIZA), P.O. Box 17, 8200 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands To be referred to as: Rajagopal, S., G. van der Velde, B.G.P. Paffen & A. bij de Vaate, 1997. Ecology and impact of exotic amphipod, Corophiumcurvispinum Sars , 1895 (Crustacea: Amphipoda), in the River Rhine and Meuse. Report (No. ) of the project "EcologicalRehabilitation of RiversRhine and Meuse" {with abstracts in Dutch, French and German). Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment (RIZA), P.O. Box 17, 8200 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands. Contents Preface I Summary III Samenvatting VII Résumé XI Zusammenfassung XV Listo f figures XIX List oftable s XXIII 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Distribution and range extensiono f Corophium curvispinum 1 1.2.Reason sfo r the present study 1 1.3. Objectives 3 2. Materials andmethod s 3 2.1. Study area 3 2.2. Methods 5 2.2.1. Life history andreproductiv e biology 5 2.2.2. Growth rates 6 2.2.3. Production 7 2.2.4. Distribution andimpact s of C. curvispinum onothe r macroinvertebrates 7 2.2.5. Mud-fixation 7 2.2.6. Filtration capacity 9 2.2.7. Hydrographie parameters 10 2.2.8. Statistical analysis 10 3. Results 10 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Habitat and Life History for Conservation of the Rare Saltmarsh Topminnow Fundulus Jenkinsi: Morphometrics, Reproduction, and Trophic Ecology
    The following supplement accompanies the article Linking habitat and life history for conservation of the rare saltmarsh topminnow Fundulus jenkinsi: morphometrics, reproduction, and trophic ecology John D. Lopez1, 3, Mark S. Peterson1,*, Erik T. Lang1, Adriana M. Charbonnet2 1Department of Coastal Sciences, The University of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564, USA 2Ocean Springs High School, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564, USA 3Present address: Texas Parks and Wildlife, Coastal Fisheries Division, Brownsville Field Office, Brownsville, Texas 78520, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Endangered Species Research 12: 141–155 (2010) Supplement 1. Summary of the data used in the multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analysis Table S1. Spring mean volume (µl) of prey items by size class (15, 20, … 40 mm) and replicate number (01 or 02) used for dietary analysis. Data are the mean value of prey volumes of all fish in each size class and replicate. P: Phylum, SP: sub-phylum, C: class, SC: sub-class, O: order, SO: sub-order, F: family, G: genus, Unid: unidentified, —: not in diet Prey size (mm) and replicate number Taxon 15–01 15–02 20–01 20–02 25–01 25–02 30–01 30–02 35–01 35–02 40–01 40–02 P. Acanthocephala –––––––––––– P. Nematoda –––––––––––– P. Mollusca C. Gastropoda – – 0.063 ––––––––– C. Polychaeta –––––––––––– C. Oligochaeta –––––––––––0.250 P. Arthropoda C. Arachnida ––––––0.140 – – 0.002 SO. Hydracarina – 0.031 –––––––––– SP. Crustacea –––––––––––– C. Maxillopoda SC. Copepoda 0.200 0.200 – 0.154 –––––––– C. Ostracoda – – 0.125 – – – 0.001 ––––– C. Malacostraca O. Amphipoda 0.200 0.200 – 0.074 0.240 0.087 0.356 0.012 0.179 – 0.098 – F.
    [Show full text]
  • Corophium Volutator Class
    These are year round inhabitants of the mudflats in Corophium volutator nearby areas. Class: Malacosstraca Order: Amphipoda Family: Corophiidae Genus: Corophium A female Corophium shown in its protective U-shaped burrow. Photo: Jim Wolford Distribution They occupy both sides of In North America, this specific species Corophium volutator occurs the North Atlantic on the only in the Bay of Fundy and the Gulf of Maine. In Europe they American and European occur from Scandinavia to the Mediterranean. coasts. This amphipod (not a true shrimp) occupies semi-permanent Habitat U-shaped burrows in the fine sediments of mud flats, salt marsh They tolerate a wide range pools and brackish ditches. When present in high densities the of salinities from nearly openings of the burrows are clearly visible on the surface of fully saline to almost fresh their habitat. water. They have different methods of feeding. Two methods may Food occur simultaneously; deposit and suspension feeding. Sediment They ingest particulate particles are retained and passed into mouth parts. Another matter, organic detritus and method is scraping organic material off the surface of sediment. diatoms. They feed at all Food must be of an appropriate size. There are seasonal stages of the tidal cycle. variations in what they consume. Diatoms (single-celled plants) flourish in the summer months. Reproduction Males initiate courtship. Males may visit as few as two burrows or as many as 18 before The timing of this is very choosing one. Conflict may occur between males when a burrow important. They emerge is entered already occupied by another single male or a paired from their burrows on female and male.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribución De Los Anfípodos (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Peracarida) De Los Subórdenes Gammaridea, Caprellidea E Hyperiidea, Presentes En El Archipiélago Cubano
    Distribución de los anfípodos (crustacea, malacostraca, peracarida) de los subórdenes gammaridea, caprellidea e hyperiidea, presentes en el archipiélago cubano Item Type Journal Contribution Authors Ortiz, M.; Lalana, R. Citation Revista de Investigaciones Marinas, 31 (2), p. 75-90 Download date 27/09/2021 06:30:40 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/4520 Rev. Invest. Mar. 31(2):75-90, 2010 DISTRIBUCIÓN DE LOS ANFÍPODOS (CRUSTACEA, MALACOSTRACA, PERACARIDA) DE LOS SUBÓRDENES GAMMARIDEA, CAPRELLIDEA E HYPERIIDEA, PRESENTES EN EL ARCHIPIÉLAGO CUBANO Manuel Ortiz y Rogelio Lalana Centro de Investigaciones Marinas, Universidad de La Habana, Calle 16 No. 114, Playa, CP 11300, Ciudad Habana, Cuba Autor correspondiente: Email: [email protected] RESUMEN Se presenta la distribución espacial y vertical de las 152 especies (37 familias y 83 géneros) de los anfípodos gammarídeos; de las 11 especies (5 familias y 10 géneros) de caprélideos, así como las 36 especies (14 familias y 22 géneros) de hiperídeos, que se han registrado en el Archipiélago Cubano, desde 1970. Cada especie ha sido situada en una tabla que se corresponde con las ecorregiones marinas de Cuba, donde además se ofrece el número de veces que dicha especie ha sido colectada en cada localidad, así como el tipo de sustrato. Palabras clave: distribución de especies; Amphipoda; ASW, Cuba. ABSTRACT The spatial and vertical distribution of the 152 species (37 families and 83 genera) of the gammaridean amphipods; the 11 species (five families, 10 genera)of the caprellidean amphipods, as well as of the 36 species (14 families and 22 genera) of Hyperiidean amphipod crustaceans recorded for the Cuban waters, from 1970, are given.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind Anemone Lines: Determining the Environmental Drivers Influencing Lagoonal Benthic Communities, with Special Reference to the Anemone Nematostella Vectensis
    Behind Anemone Lines: Determining the environmental drivers influencing lagoonal benthic communities, with special reference to the anemone Nematostella vectensis. by Jessica R. Bone Bournemouth University December 2018 Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognize that its copyright rests with its author and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis. i Behind Anemone Lines: Determining the environmental drivers influencing lagoonal benthic communities, with special reference to the anemone Nematostella vectensis. Jess R. Bone Abstract Climate change induced sea level rise and increase in associated storms is impacting the coastal zone worldwide. Lagoons are a transitional ecosystem on the coast that are threatened with habitat loss due to ingress of seawater, though conversely this also represents an opportunity for lagoon habitat creation. It is important to quantify the spatio-temporal trends of macrozoobenthic communities and abiotic factors to determine the ecological health of lagoon sites. Such information will ensure optimal and adaptive management of these rare and protected ecosystems. This thesis examines the spatial distribution of macrozoobenthic assemblages and the abiotic and biotic factors that may determine their abundance, richness and distribution at tidally restricted urban lagoon at Poole Park on the south coast of England. The macrozoobenthic assemblages were sampled using a suction corer during a spatially comprehensive survey in November 2017, in addition to aquatic and sediment variables such as salinity, temperature, organic matter content and silt content. Species richness and density were significantly lower in areas of high organic matter and silt content, indicative of hostile conditions.
    [Show full text]