DOCSLIB.ORG

A29 REALIGNMENT Transport Business Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

West Sussex County Council A29 REALIGNMENT Transport Business Case TBC-R4 APRIL 2019 CONFIDENTIAL West Sussex County Council A29 REALIGNMENT Transport Business Case TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) CONFIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 70031782 OUR REF. NO. TBC-R4 DATE: APRIL 2019 WSP Regus House Southampton International Business Park, George Curl Way Southampton, Hampshire SO18 2RZ Phone: +44 238 030 2529 Fax: +44 238 030 2001 WSP.com CONFIDENTIAL QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Final Remarks Working Draft Draft Final Draft (for Final Draft Final for WSCC final (for WSCC C2C LEP updated) final updated) Date 09/12/2018 18/12/2018 20/12/2018 24/12/2018 04/04/2019 Prepared by Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Chris Chris Whitehead Chris Whitehead Chris Chris Whitehead Whitehead Whitehead Alex Georgeson Alex Georgeson Elaine Martin Alex Alex Elaine Martin Elaine Martin (WSCC) Georgeson Georgeson (WSCC) (WSCC) Elaine Martin Elaine (WSCC) Martin (WSCC) Signature Checked by Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Signature Authorised by Alan Cowan Alan Cowan Alan Cowan Alan Cowan Alan Cowan Signature Project number 70031782 70031782 70031782 70031782 70031782 Report number 70031782-TBC- 70031782-TBC- 70031782-TBC- 70031782- 70031782- 01 R1 R2 TBC-R3 TBC-R4 File reference \\uk.wspgroup.com\central data\Projects\700317xx\70031782 - WSCC - A29 Prelim Design and O\02 WIP\BC Business Case\Transport Business Case A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1 STRATEGIC CASE SUMMARY 1 OVERVIEW 1 POLICY BACKGROUND AND BUSINESS STRATEGY 1 National Policies 1 Regional Policies 2 Local Policies 2 EXISTING TRANSPORT-RELATED PROBLEMS 4 FUTURE TRANSPORT-RELATED PROBLEMS 4 OPTIONS AND THE PROPOSED SCHEME 4 Scheme Aim & Objective 4 Scope and Constraints 4 Options Considered 4 Proposed Scheme 5 Achievement of Objectives 6 ECONOMIC CASE SUMMARY 6 Benefit Cost Ratio 6 Value for Money Category 6 FINANCIAL CASE SUMMARY 6 COMMERCIAL CASE SUMMARY 6 MANAGEMENT CASE SUMMARY 7 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE TRANSPORT BUSINESS CASE 8 1.2 BACKGROUND 8 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THE TRANSPORT BUSINESS CASE 10 2 THE SCHEME 11 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 2.1 LOCATION OF THE SCHEME 11 2.1.10 OVERVIEW 12 2.2 SCHEME DESIGN 14 2.2.2 ALTERATIONS TO THE ADJACENT ROAD NETWORK 14 2.2.4 PROVISION FOR OTHER USERS 14 3 STRATEGIC CASE 15 3.1 INTRODUCTION 15 3.2 POLICY BACKGROUND AND BUSINESS STRATEGY 16 3.2.1 OVERVIEW 16 3.2.3 NATIONAL POLICIES 17 3.2.18 REGIONAL POLICIES 19 3.2.37 LOCAL POLICIES 22 3.3 EXISTING PROBLEMS 25 3.4 FUTURE PROBLEMS – THE IMPACT OF NOT CHANGING 26 3.5 DRIVERS FOR CHANGE 27 3.6 SCHEME AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 27 3.7 MEASURES FOR SUCCESS 28 3.7.4 MONITORING & EVALUATION 28 3.8 SCOPE 29 3.8.1 IN SCOPE 29 3.8.4 OUT OF SCOPE 30 3.9 CONSTRAINTS 30 3.10 INTERDEPENDENCIES 31 3.11 OPTIONS 31 3.11.1 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY 31 3.11.15 OPTION DEVELOPMENT (FOLLOWING PREVIOUS STUDIES) 40 3.11.19 OPTIONS ASSESSED 42 3.12 CONSULTATION WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS 43 3.12.3 KEY STAKEHOLDERS 44 3.12.14 FURTHER CONSULTATION 45 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 3.13 EXPECTED IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SCHEME 45 3.13.1 LOCAL MODEL VALIDATION REPORT 45 3.13.7 OPTION DEVELOPMENT - TRANSPORT BUSINESS CASE 46 3.13.19 TRAFFIC FLOWS 48 3.13.23 DO MINIMUM AND PHASE 1 (NORTH) 49 3.13.32 DO MINIMUM AND PHASE 1 (NORTH) AND 2 (SOUTH) 56 3.13.43 JOURNEY TIMES 64 3.13.46 2023 DO MINIMUM AND DO SOMETHING 64 3.13.51 2038 DO MINIMUM AND DO SOMETHING 67 3.14 DEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT 71 3.15 ACCIDENT REDUCTIONS 73 3.16 STRATEGIC CASE SUMMARY 75 3.16.1 OVERVIEW 75 3.16.5 POLICY BACKGROUND AND BUSINESS STRATEGY 75 3.16.9 EXISTING TRANSPORT-RELATED PROBLEMS 75 3.16.11 FUTURE TRANSPORT-RELATED PROBLEMS 76 3.16.13 OPTIONS AND THE PROPOSED SCHEME 76 4 ECONOMIC CASE 79 4.1 INTRODUCTION 79 4.2 OPTIONS APPRAISED 79 4.2.2 OPTION IDENTIFICATION AND SHORTLISTING 79 4.2.4 OPTION ASSESSMENT 81 4.2.7 PREFERRED OPTION – OPTION 2 = PHASE 1 (NORTH) AND PHASE 2 (SOUTH) 81 4.3 COST ESTIMATION 81 4.4 BENEFITS MODELLING 82 4.4.3 FORECAST BENEFITS 84 4.4.6 USER BENEFITS 84 4.4.9 MARGINAL EXTERNALITIES 85 4.4.12 ACCIDENT ASSESSMENT 85 4.4.15 DELAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION 86 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 4.5 APPRAISAL ASSUMPTIONS 86 4.6 APPRAISAL RESULTS 86 4.7 SENSITIVITY TESTING 88 4.7.2 COST AND BENEFIT SENSITIVITIES 88 4.7.5 SWITCHING VALUES 88 4.8 APPRAISAL SUMMARY TABLE 88 4.8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL 88 4.8.4.1 Noise 88 4.8.6.1 Air Quality 89 4.8.7.1 Greenhouse gases 89 4.8.8.1 Landscape & Townscape 89 4.8.11.1 Historic Environment 89 4.8.12.1 Biodiversity 89 4.8.14.1 Water Environment 89 4.8.18 SOCIAL 90 4.8.18.1 Physical activity 90 4.8.19.1 Journey quality 90 4.8.20.1 Accidents 90 4.8.21.1 Security 90 4.8.22.1 Access to services 90 4.8.23.1 Affordability 90 4.8.24.1 Severance 91 4.8.25.1 Option and non-use values 91 4.8.27 DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS 91 4.9 WIDER IMPACTS 91 4.10 LAND VALUE UPLIFT 91 4.10.4 LAND VALUE UPLIFT ESTIMATE 92 4.10.4.1 Assumptions 92 4.10.6.1 Results 92 4.11 VALUE FOR MONEY STATEMENT 93 4.12 ECONOMIC CASE SUMMARY 96 4.12.2 BENEFIT COST RATIO 96 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 4.12.4 VALUE FOR MONEY CATEGORY 96 4.12.6 DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT APPRAISAL 96 5 FINANCIAL CASE 97 5.1 INTRODUCTION 97 5.2 COSTS 97 5.2.12 SCHEME PREPARATION AND CONSTRUCTION 98 5.2.14 RISK BUDGET 99 5.2.16 SPEND PROFILE 99 5.2.18 OUT-TURN PRICE ADJUSTMENT 99 5.3 BUDGETS AND FUNDING COVER 99 5.4 WHOLE LIFE COSTS 101 5.5 CAPITAL RENEWAL COSTS 101 5.6 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING COSTS 101 5.7 ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS: CASH FLOW STATEMENT 102 5.8 SUMMARY OF THE FINANCIAL CASE 102 6 COMMERCIAL CASE 103 6.1 INTRODUCTION 103 6.2 PROCUREMENT STRATEGY 103 6.3 FORM OF CONTRACT 104 6.3.2 FORM OF CONTRACT OPTIONS 104 6.3.8 FORM OF CONTRACT DISCUSSION 104 6.3.12 PREFERRED FORM OF CONTRACT 105 6.4 FORM OF PROCUREMENT 105 6.4.5 PROCUREMENT OPTIONS 105 6.4.16 PROCUREMENT DISCUSSION 107 6.4.24 PREFERRED PROCUREMENT ROUTE 108 6.5 CONTRACT STRATEGY 108 6.6 SELECTED PROCUREMENT STRATEGY 108 6.7 DESIGN ORGANISATION 109 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 6.8 PAYMENT MECHANISMS 109 6.9 PRICING FRAMEWORK AND CHARGING MECHANISMS 109 6.10 RISK ALLOCATION AND TRANSFER 109 6.11 CONTRACT LENGTH 109 6.12 HUMAN RESOURCE ISSUES 110 6.13 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT 110 6.14 SUMMARY OF THE COMMERCIAL CASE 111 7 MANAGEMENT CASE 112 7.1 INTRODUCTION 112 7.2 EVIDENCE OF SIMILAR PROJECTS 112 7.2.3 DELIVERY TEAM EXPERIENCE 114 7.2.7 CONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE 114 7.3 THE PROJECT PLAN 114 7.4 GOVERNANCE, ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE & ROLES 114 7.4.1 PROJECT BOARD 114 7.4.8 WSP PROJECT DELIVERY TEAM 116 7.4.11 AVOIDING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 116 7.4.13 WSCC ASSESSMENT TEAM 117 7.5 THE PROJECT PROGRAMME 117 7.6 PROGRAMME DEPENDENCIES 117 7.7 ASSURANCE AND APPROVALS PLAN 117 7.7.1 GATEWAY REVIEWS 117 7.7.4 PROGRAMME FOR GATEWAY REVIEWS 118 7.7.6 FUNDING ASSURANCE 119 7.8 FINANCIAL PLAN 119 7.9 COMMUNICATIONS AND STAKEHOLDERS MANAGEMENT PLAN 119 7.9.2 COMMUNICATION AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY 119 7.9.8 STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT PLAN 119 7.10 RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 122 7.10.2 RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS 122 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 7.10.5 RISK IDENTIFICATION 123 7.10.10 QUANTIFICATION OF RISKS 124 7.10.16 MANAGING RISKS (RESPONSE PLANS AND MITIGATION) 124 7.10.19 IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW 125 7.10.21 SIGNIFICANT PROJECT RISKS IDENTIFIED 125 7.11 BENEFITS REALISATION PLAN 125 7.12 MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN 130 7.12.4 DESCRIPTION 132 7.12.6 LOGIC MODEL 132 7.12.8 TYPE OF EVALUATION 132 7.12.10 DATA REQUIREMENTS 132 7.12.12 SOURCES OF DATA 133 7.12.14 IMPLEMENTATION 134 7.12.17 RESPONSIBILITY 134 7.12.19 SETTING TARGETS 134 7.12.24 LINKING INDICATORS TO OUTCOMES 134 7.13 SUMMARY OF THE MANAGEMENT CASE 135 TABLES Table 3-1 - SEP Six Year Transport Investment Programme 21 Table 3-2: First Stage Evaluation Summary Table (Northern Extensions to Route A) 35 Table 3-3: First Stage Evaluation Summary Table (Northern Extensions to Route D) 35 Table 3-4: First Stage Evaluation Summary Table (Southern Extensions to Route A) 36 Table 3-5: First Stage Evaluation Summary Table (Southern Extensions to Route D) 36 Table 3-6: Option Assessment Summary 38 Table 3-7: A29 Realignment preferred option 42 Table 3-8: A29 Realignment preferred option – Comparison of AM Peak Traffic Flows on existing A29 and New A29 Realignment 43 Table 3-9: Comparison of Flows on A29 (AM peak) 50 Table 3-10: Comparison of Flows on A29 (IP) 50 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council Table 3-11: - Comparison of Flows on A29 (PM peak) 52 Table 3-12- Comparison of Flows on A29 (AM peak) 57 Table 3-13- Comparison of Flows on A29 (IP) 57 Table 3-14- Comparison of Flows on A29 (PM peak) 58 Table 3-15 - 2023 DM vs DS AM Peak - Journey time comparison 65 Table 3-16- 2023 DM vs DS Interpeak - Journey time comparison 65 Table 3-17- 2023 DM vs DS PM Peak - Journey time comparison
Recommended publications
  • Slinfold Neighbourhood Plan 2014-31

    Slinfold Neighbourhood Plan 2014-31

    2014 - 2031 Slinfold Neighbourhood Plan Aerial photographs courtesy of Paul Armstrong, www.picturesfromabove.co.uk June 2018 Slinfold Neighbourhood Plan Contents Page Introduction 1 Parish Profile 5 Vision and Objectives 10 Environment and Heritage 11 Introduction 11 Aim 1: Preventing Coalescence between Slinfold and Broadbridge Heath. 12 Policy 1: Conservation Area 12 Policy 2: Protection of Local Green Spaces 14 Policy 3 Green Infrastructure 15 Policy 4: Conserve and Enhance Biodiversity 16 Housing 18 Policy 5: Development Principles 19 Policy 6: Housing Mix 20 Policy 7: East of Hayes Lane 21 Policy 8: Crosby Farm 22 Policy 9: West of Spring Lane 23 Policy 10: The Cobblers 24 Economy 27 Policy 11: Existing Employment Centres 26 Policy 12: Economy and Enterprise 27 Aim 2: Super-fast Broadband 27 Slinfold Neighbourhood Plan Transport 30 Aim 3: Village Centre 30 Aim 4: Public Rights of Way 31 Aim 5: Quiet Lanes 31 Aim 6: Off Street Parking 32 Aim 7: Public Transport 32 Community Infrastructure 33 Policy 13: Community Facilities 33 Policy 14: Open Space 34 Aim 8: School Provision 35 Policy 15: School Provision 36 Implementation and Delivery 37 Maps 38 Evidence Base 39 Slinfold Neighbourhood Plan Foreword Welcome to the Slinfold Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) for the Parish of Slinfold. This Plan is a commission from Slinfold Parish Council (SPC) which set up the Slinfold Neighbourhood Plan Working Group (SNPWG) to work with residents and local businesses to formulate a framework for the Parish and its evolution up to 2031. Under the Localism Act, Parish Councils and Qualifying Bodies have been given powers to deal with the local issues of planning and help planning authorities understand these issues.
  • Landscape Capacity Study May 2021 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION

    Landscape Capacity Study May 2021 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION

    Horsham District Landscape Capacity Assessment Rev C May 2021 2 Rev C - The changes made to the document are to correct printing errors (formatting and omission as result of changes from a word processing program to a publishing program) and can be found in the following pages: 14, 18, 22, 34, 44, 66, 77, 83, 99, 101, 124, 130, 131, 132, 141, 159, 166, 167, 171. Associated maps have also been updated to reflect changes where necessary. Horsham District Council CONTENTS 3 1.0 Introduction 4 2.0 Approach and Methodology 7 3.0 Part One: Capacity Assessment For Urban Extensions To The Main Town Of Horsham, Small Towns Or Large Villages, Or New Settlements Zone 1: North Horsham to Crawley 20 Zone 2: South Horsham to Southwater 36 Zone 3: West and North West Horsham 49 Zone 4: Pulborough to Billingshurst 57 Zone 5: Storrington and West Chiltington Common 72 Zone 6: Steyning, Bramber and Upper Beeding 84 Zone 7: Henfield 88 Zone 8: Mayfields 95 Zone 9: Kingsfold 102 Zone 10: Land at Newhouse Farm 107 4.0 Part Two: Capacity Assessment For Medium Or Smaller Settlements Ashington 111 Barns Green 116 Cowfold 120 Lower Beeding 126 Mannings Heath 129 Partridge Green 134 Rudgwick and Bucks Green 139 Rusper 146 Slinfold 151 Small Dole 157 Thakeham (The Street and High Bar Lane) 160 Warnham 165 West Chiltington Village 170 5.0 Conclusions 174 Landscape Capacity Study May 2021 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION Study Context and Background to the Study Horsham District is a predominantly rural this regard the Strategic Planning Team at area, with extensive areas of countryside Horsham District Council commissioned the interspersed with small villages and towns.
  • TO LET Well Presented Unit Total Area: 48.31 Sq M (520 Sq Ft)

    TO LET Well Presented Unit Total Area: 48.31 Sq M (520 Sq Ft)

    The Old Forge, Bury Gate, Bury RH20 1NL TO LET Well Presented Unit Total Area: 48.31 sq m (520 sq ft) Key Features • Rent £7,500 per annum exclusive • On site parking • Available for a variety of uses (stp) • To let on new FRI lease Agency | Lease Advisory | Management | Valuation | Investment | Development The Old Forge, Bury Gate, Bury RH20 1NL Location Bury Gate is situated one mile north of Bury village on the A29, 4 miles south west of Pulborough, and eight miles north of Arundel on the A29 road, providing easy access to the A27 to the south and routes heading north to London such as the A24 and A23. The subject property occupies a corner position fronting the A29 with access to the site off the B2138, the Fittleworth Road. Accommodation We have been provided with the following approximate net internal floor areas: Planning Please note that whilst we endeavour to confirm the Total Area: 48.31 sq m (520 sq ft) prevailing approved planning use for properties we market, we can offer no guarantees in this regard. EPC Planning information is stated to the best of our We understand this property is listed and therefore knowledge. Interested parties are advised to make their exempt from the provision of an EPC. own enquiries to satisfy themselves in respect of planning issues. Terms The property is available to let by way of a new full Business Rates repairing and insuring lease for a term to be agreed at Rateable Value : £3,000 a commencing rent of £7,500 per annum exclusive.
  • Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath.
  • Cala Group Land

    Cala Group Land

    LUKEN BECK 30 Carlton Crescent, Southampton SO15 2EW Tel: 023 8063 3440 www.lukenbeck.com The Clerk to the Parish Council Aldingbourne Parish Council c/o Red House 15th July 2016 100 Middleton Road Our Ref: AG/15070 Middleton-on-Sea Your Ref: West Sussex By e-mail only Dear Sir / Madam, REPRESENTATIONS TO THE ALDINGBOURNE SUBMISSION NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN (2016 - 2036) REGULATION 15 PUBLIC CONSULTATION We write on behalf of our client, CALA Homes (Southern Home Counties) Ltd, who have an interest in the land to the east of Westergate, as shown in Figure 1 below. The content of this letter comprises our client's formal response to the Aldingbourne Submission Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016 - 2036 (referred to in this letter as 'Reg 15 ANP 2016'), which is currently subject to public consultation under Regulation 15 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. Appended to this letter are our Regulation 14 comments, the Assessment of Value of Site as a Biodiversity Corridor (ECOSA, March 2016) and an Ecological Constraints and Opportunities Plan which should be read in combination with this letter. Our client's land falls within the Reg 15 ANP 2016 area and forms part of the proposed Barnham / Eastergate / Westergate (BEW) Strategic Allocation for 2000+ houses, community infrastructure and A29 realignment under Policy H SP1 of the Submission Draft Arun District Local Plan 2011 - 2031 (ADLP). The site is an important part of the wider draft Strategic Allocation and provides the east-west connection between the existing A29 and Barnham Railway Station, as required by Policy H SP1.
  • Aldingbourne NP SEA Environmental Report V2.0 300320

    Aldingbourne NP SEA Environmental Report V2.0 300320

    Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Environmental Report to accompany the Regulation 14 version of the Neighbourhood Plan Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group March 2020 Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Environmental Report to accompany Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Regulation 14 consultation Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Ryan Putt Nick Chisholm-Batten Alastair Peattie Alastair Peattie Environmental Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position V1.0 20th January Initial draft for 21st January Nick Chisholm- Associate 2020 Neighbourhood 2020 Batten Director Group comment V2.0 30th March 2020 Regulation 14 30th March 2020 Nick Chisholm- Associate consultation Batten Director version Prepared for: Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Environmental Report to accompany Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Regulation 14 consultation Table of Contents Non-Technical Summary ...................................................................................
  • Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Development Plan 2014-29

    Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Development Plan 2014-29

    Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029 Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Development Plan 2014-29 Submission Plan - December 2013 1 Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029 Content Foreword 1. Introduction 2. Barnham and Eastergate Today 3. Vision Statement and Core Objectives 4. Introduction to the Policies 5. Environment and Sustainability 6. Getting Around 7. Community, Leisure and Wellbeing 8. Employment and Enterprise 9. Housing Allocation and Quality Maps A. The Area of the Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Plan B. Church Lane Barnham Conservation Area C. Church Lane Eastergate Conservation Area D. Eastergate Square Conservation Area E. Area of Special Character F. Open Spaces G. Proposals Map Schedules A. Assets of Community Value B. Local Green Spaces C. Local Open Spaces D. Sites where planning permission has been or may be granted Addendum 2 Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029 Foreword The popularity and attraction of the villages of Barnham and Eastergate are principally based on the separate characters of the two settlements, their geographical location between the South Downs and the coast, with the open landscape of fields laced with water courses and hedgerows which surround the settlements, and the presence of patches and strips of ancient woodland throughout the area. In addition each village has conservation areas and an area of special character, with a mixture of statutory and locally listed historical buildings, and those with special character. Investment in the villages, and change in future years, will only be worthwhile if these make a real difference to the lives of local people and the future of their community.
  • History Walk

    History Walk

    History Walk A walk through over 2000 years of local history and see some of the area’s most magnificent scenic views. This walk: • is 4.8-6.5 kilometres (3-4 miles) long • takes about 2.5-3.5 hours • has no steep hills and is easy walking • is unsuitable for a push chair • has no stiles on the shorter route and two kissing gates on the longer route • can be slippery when wet • uses OS map 197 • has a café at the start and a pub and café with toilets half way round When walking always follow the countryside code. www.countrysideaccess.gov.uk A short background to Pulborough and its history: The landscape features that have dominated the history and development of the Pulborough area are the river and floodplain, the greensand ridge that runs east-west through Pulborough village and the fertile area to the north of the greensand ridge. From left: The Old Rectory; Cattle in brooks; Lower Street This has generated the development of Pulborough Village as the heart of the area, the hamlets of Nutbourne, Mare Hill and Codmore Hill around the greensand ridge and isolated agricultural buildings to the north of the greensand ridge. The Pulborough area closer to the river Arun has been inhabited since very early times due to the river providing fish and a waterway for trade and improving the fertility of the flood plain to the south. Pulborough is a “linear village”, that is a long straggle of houses under the greensand ridge that were served by wells that drained out of the greensand at this level.
  • Local Plan Representation Appendices

    Local Plan Representation Appendices

    Church Commissioners for England – Land Ownership at North Bersted, Bognor Regis Church Commissioners for England – Land Ownership at Eastergate, Westergate and Barnham A Vision for The Three Villages Barnham, Eastergate & Westergate Church Commissioners for England September 2012 The Team Church Commissioners for England Carter Jonas Church House, Great Smith Street London SW1P 3AZ Berger House, 36-38 Berkeley Square, London W1J 5AE T. +44 (0)207 898 1024 F. +44 (0)207 898 1153 T. +44 (0)20 7016 0732 www.carterjonas.co.uk John Thompson & Partners London Studio 23-25 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DN T. +44 (0)20 7017 1780 F. +44 (0)20 7017 1781 www.jtp.co.uk Savell Bird & Axon Part of the WYG Group 100 St John Street, London, EC1M 4EH T. +44 (0)20 7580 8844 F. +44 (0)20 75808818 www.sbax.co.uk A VISION FOR THE THREE VILLAGES - BARNHAM, EASTERGATE & WESTERGATE PAGE III Contents 1. BACKGROUND 1 2. UNDERSTANDING THE THREE VILLAGES 3 3. DESIGN PRINCIPLES 15 4. VISION 23 5. SUMMARY 25 DISCLAIMER: PROJECT CODE 00605 This report has been prepared for the sole use of Church Commissioners and for the intended purposes as stated in the CREATED BY SXM agreement between Church Commissioners and John Thompson & Partners (JTP). No responsibility or liability is accepted towards any other person in respect of the use of this report or for reliance on the information contained in this report by any CHECKED BY EC other person or for any other purpose. The use of this report by unauthorised third parties without written authorisation from JTP ISSUE TYPE FINAL shall be at their own risk, and JTP accept no duty of care to any such third party.
  • The Hedgerows

    The Hedgerows

    THE HEDGEROWS FROM CHICHESTER: FROM A24: Fontwell Avenue, • Take the A285 heading North East • Head south on the A24, at the roundabout take Eastergate, Chichester, • At the roundabout, take the 3rd exit onto the 4th exit onto Crockhurst Hill/A27 West Sussex Portfield Way/A285 • Continue straight onto Lyminster Road/A27 PO20 3AR • At Portfield Roundabout, take the 2nd exit onto • At the next three roundabouts, take the exits to Arundel Road/Westhampnett Bypass/A27 continue on the A27 CONTACT US ON • At the roundabout, take the 2nd exit and stay • At the next two roundabouts, take the 2nd exits 01243 218 513 on Arundel Road/A27 onto Fontwell Avenue/A29 • At the roundabout, take the 3rd exit onto • The development will be on your right SATNAV Fontwell Avenue/A29 PO20 3RU • The development will be on your right N L S D L E I FONTWELL FARM F H SLINDON COMMON T R O N BOXGROVE THE HEDGEROWS A27 A27 THE HEDGEROWS A27 FONTWELL NORTON 9 TANGMERE 2 A RD B N ARNETT TO CL EASTERGATE | WEST SUSSEX NY NYTON RD THE HEDGEROWS BARN HAM EASTERGATE RD T S C WESTERGATE H E T U D A R R G C R H M L E L I L T M #taylorwimpey E S N E E D A L BARNHAM C W R V Y E V W I E I @TaylorWimpey V H G I IVY LN H C taylorwimpey COLWORTH D HUR R CH LN A259 S D R A WESTERGATE H C I R S T CORNFIEL D THE S taylorwimpey.co.uk Taylor Wimpey in their efforts to improve designs reserve the right to alter site plans, floor plans, elevations and specifications without notice.
  • DOWNLAND Area Transport Plan Foreword

    DOWNLAND Area Transport Plan Foreword

    DOWNLAND Area Transport Plan Foreword I am delighted to introduce Area Transport Plans. We have developed the Plans through the work of Highways & Transport Partnerships (and Area Committees) and I am grateful to them for their hard work. The overriding aim of the Area Transport Plans is to facilitate the delivery of better local transport, as quickly as possible, by focusing efforts on a small number of key transport priorities. The Area Transport Plans are set in the context of our new West Sussex Transport Plan covering the period 2006 to 2016. The development of local transport strategies in the Area Plans have taken on board all aspects of the authority's long-term vision for the area. I therefore hope that together we can strive to deliver against the local priorities outlined in the Area Transport Plans. It is not easy and we all need to play our part. Lt. Col.Tex Pemberton OBE Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Richard Wilby Chairman of the Joint Downland Area Committee Contents PAGE 3 Introduction 4-5 The Bigger Picture 7 Your Community 8-9 Key Issue - Congestion 10-11 Key Issue - HGVs on Minor Roads 12-13 Key Issue - Level Crossings 14-15 Key Issue - Severance 16-17 Key Issue - Integrated Transport 19 What Happens Next? Introduction This Plan reflects local views on transport in the Downland Car travel is easy, but more cars on the roads can cause area and will help determine actions by West Sussex County problems. For example: Council over the next ten years. The Plan looks at all Some people who once walked or cycled now feel methods of travelling in the area.
  • Billingshurst Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan

    Billingshurst Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan

    Billingshurst Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan January 2018 Contents Background 4 Introduction 6 Historic development summary 10 Landscape setting 14 Townscape and historic environment 22 Character areas 26 Views 32 Negative elements 34 Management plan 35 Appendix 1: Historic development 40 2: Gazetteer of listed buildings 42 3: Landscape sensitivity criteria 53 4: Boundary review justification 54 5: Glossary of terms 56 Built Heritage Consultancy influe nce® 1. Background What does Conservation Area designation mean? On 27th November 2015, Horsham District Council adopted the Horsham District Planning Framework (HDPF). The HDPF sets out the planning The Statutory definition of a Conservation Area is an “area of special strategy for the years up to 2031 to deliver social, economic and architectural or historic interest, the character and appearance of environmental needs for the district (outside the South Downs National which it is desirable to preserve or enhance”. The power to designate Park). Conservation Areas is given to Local Authorities through the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act, 1990 (Sections 69 to 78). Chapter 9, Conserving and Enhancing the Natural and Built Environment, is of particular importance for conservation and design issues. The policies Proposals within a Conservation Area become subject to policies outlined contained within this chapter deal with many themes central to the in section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), as conservation and enhancement of heritage assets and local character. well as local planning policies outlined in the Horsham District Council Planning Framework. The duties for Horsham District Council, set out in Conservation Area designation introduces controls over the way Section 69-72 the Act are: owners can alter or develop their properties.