DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Environmental Assessment S.E.A CAAB 2021 Strategic Environmental Assessment Climate Action and Low Carbon Development (Amendment) Bill 2021 Draft For Consultation May 2021 Version 0.9 Disclaimer This document is provided as an independent third-party analysis. Reasonable care, skill and judgement have been exercised in the preparation of this document to address the objectives and to examine and inform the consideration of the identified topic. Unless specifically stated, there has not been independent verification of third-party information utilised in this report. Opinions expressed within this report reflect the judgment of AP EnvEcon Limited (trading as EnvEcon Decision Support) at the date approved. None of the contents of this report should be considered as financial or legal advice. AP EnvEcon Limited (trading as EnvEcon Decision Support) accepts no responsibility for the outcomes of actions or decisions taken on the basis of the contents. Reference EnvEcon, (2021), SEA Climate Action and Low Carbon Development (Amendment) Bill May 2021, 2021, Dublin: EnvEcon Acknowledgements We acknowledge the engagement and support of the competent authority- the Department of Environment, Climate and Communication, as well as the opinions and perspectives shared by the Environmental Protection Agency and other stakeholders. SEA Climate Action and Low Carbon Development (Amendment) Bill 2021 May 2021 Table of contents, figures, and tables NON-TECHNICAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................6 1. Context ............................................................................................................................................................................ 6 2. The 2021 Bill .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 3. The SEA Process and Scope........................................................................................................................................ 7 4. Other plans and programmes ...................................................................................................................................... 7 5. Baseline ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8 6. Main environmental impacts and reasonable alternative ...................................................................................... 12 7. Mitigation measures ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 8. Monitoring and governance ....................................................................................................................................... 17 9. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................................... 17 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 18 1.1 Context - Climate Change and Ireland ..................................................................................................................... 18 1.2 Context - Policy Developments in Ireland .............................................................................................................. 18 1.3 Proposals for an Amendment to the Climate Action Act..................................................................................... 21 1.4 The Strategic Environmental Assessment Approach ............................................................................................ 27 1.5 Structure of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 30 2. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER RELEVANT PLANS, PROGRAMMES AND STRATEGIES 32 2.2 Climate ........................................................................................................................................................................... 32 2.3 Infrastructure and Planning ....................................................................................................................................... 34 2.4 Agriculture, Land Use and Forestry.......................................................................................................................... 35 2.5 Energy generation and Built environment............................................................................................................... 37 2.6 Transport....................................................................................................................................................................... 38 2.7 Waste ............................................................................................................................................................................. 39 2.8 Biodiversity ................................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.9 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................................................... 41 2.10 Water Quality ............................................................................................................................................................... 43 2.11 Landscape, seascape, and cultural heritage .............................................................................................................. 43 2 SEA Climate Action and Low Carbon Development (Amendment) Bill 2021 May 2021 3. BASELINE – THE STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN IRELAND ....................................... 44 3.1 Biodiversity ................................................................................................................................................................... 44 3.1.1 Biodiversity: Baseline .............................................................................................................................................. 44 3.1.2 Biodiversity: Environmental protection objectives ........................................................................................... 46 3.2 Population & human health ....................................................................................................................................... 46 3.2.1 Population and human health: Baseline .............................................................................................................. 46 3.2.2 Population and Human Health: Environmental protection objectives ......................................................... 47 3.1 Soil .................................................................................................................................................................................. 48 3.1.1 Soil: Baseline ............................................................................................................................................................ 48 3.1.2 Soil: Environmental Protection Objectives ........................................................................................................ 49 3.2 Water .............................................................................................................................................................................. 49 3.2.1 Water: Baseline ........................................................................................................................................................ 49 3.2.2 Water: Environmental protection objectives ...................................................................................................... 52 3.3 Air ................................................................................................................................................................................... 52 3.3.1 Air: Baseline ............................................................................................................................................................. 52 3.3.2 Air: Environmental Protection Objectives ......................................................................................................... 54 3.4 Climate ........................................................................................................................................................................... 54 3.4.1 Climate: Baseline ..................................................................................................................................................... 54 3.4.2 Climate: Environmental Protection Objectives ................................................................................................. 56 3.5 Cultural heritage & landscape .................................................................................................................................... 56 3.5.1 Cultural heritage, landscape, and material assets: Baseline ............................................................................... 56 3.5.2 Heritage and landscape: Environmental Protection Objectives ...................................................................... 57 3.6 Material Assets
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Workfare Redux? Pandemic Unemployment, Labour Activation
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/0144-333X.htm Workfare Workfare redux? Pandemic redux unemployment, labour activation and the lessons of post-crisis welfare reform in Ireland 963 Michael McGann Received 30 July 2020 Revised 26 August 2020 Maynooth University Social Sciences Institute, Accepted 26 August 2020 National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, Ireland Mary P. Murphy Department of Sociology, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, Ireland, and Nuala Whelan Maynooth University Social Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, Ireland Abstract Purpose – This paper addresses the labour market impacts of Covid-19, the necessity of active labour policy reform in response to this pandemic unemployment crisis and what trajectory this reform is likely to take as countries shift attention from emergency income supports to stimulating employment recovery. Design/methodology/approach – The study draws on Ireland’s experience, as an illustrative case. This is motivated by the scale of Covid-related unemployment in Ireland, which is partly a function of strict lockdown measures but also the policy choices made in relation to the architecture of income supports. Also, Ireland was one of the countries most impacted by the Great Recession leading it to introduce sweeping reforms of its active labour policy architecture. Findings – The analysis shows that the Covid unemployment crisis has far exceeded that of the last financial and banking crisis in Ireland. Moreover, Covid has also exposed the fragility of Ireland’s recovery from the Great Recession and the fault-lines of poor public services, which intensify precarity in the context of low-paid employment growth precipitated by workfare policies implemented since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corporate Governance of Agencies in Ireland Non
    CorporateGovernanceAgencies-Prelims.qxd 22/11/2005 17:32 Page 1 The Corporate Governance of Agencies in Ireland Non-commercial National Agencies CorporateGovernanceAgencies-Prelims.qxd 22/11/2005 17:32 Page 2 CorporateGovernanceAgencies-Prelims.qxd 22/11/2005 17:32 Page 3 CPMR Research Report 6 The Corporate Governance of Agencies in Ireland Non-commercial National Agencies Anne-Marie McGauran Koen Verhoest Peter C. Humphreys CorporateGovernanceAgencies-Prelims.qxd 22/11/2005 17:32 Page 4 First published in 2005 by the Institute of Public Administration 57-61 Lansdowne Road Dublin 4 Ireland in association with The Committee for Public Management Research www.ipa.ie © 2005 with the Institute of Public Administration All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 1-904541-30-5 ISSN 1393-9424 Cover design by M&J Graphics, Dublin Typeset by the Institute of Public Administration Printed by BetaPrint, Dublin CorporateGovernanceAgencies-Prelims.qxd 22/11/2005 17:32 Page 5 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ix About the Authors x Executive Summary xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Setting the scene 1 1.2 Structure of the report 2 Chapter 2: Agencies - what and why? 4 2.1 What are agencies? 4 2.2 Agencies: why?
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Wages and the Gender Gap in Pay: New Evidence from the UK and Ireland
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 11502 Minimum Wages and the Gender Gap in Pay: New Evidence from the UK and Ireland Olivier Bargain Karina Doorley Philippe Van Kerm APRIL 2018 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 11502 Minimum Wages and the Gender Gap in Pay: New Evidence from the UK and Ireland Olivier Bargain Bordeaux University and IZA Karina Doorley ESRI and IZA Philippe Van Kerm University of Luxembourg and LISER APRIL 2018 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 11502 APRIL 2018 ABSTRACT Minimum Wages and the Gender Gap in Pay: New Evidence from the UK and Ireland Women are disproportionately in low paid work compared to men so, in the absence of rationing effects on their employment, they should benefit the most from minimum wage policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartel Sentencing in Ireland: Criminal Standards of Proof, but Civil Sanctions
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Munich RePEc Personal Archive MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Cartel Sentencing in Ireland: Criminal Standards of Proof, But Civil Sanctions Paul Gorecki Department of Economics, Trinity College Dublin 1 November 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/89817/ MPRA Paper No. 89817, posted 7 November 2018 02:28 UTC Cartel Sentencing in Ireland: Criminal Standards of Proof, But Civil Sanctions By Paul K Gorecki* Abstract On 20 June 2018 the Court of Appeal in Ireland’s first bid-rigging case determined that the €7,500 fine imposed by the lower court on a corporate officer was unduly lenient. It was increased to €45,000. The €10,000 fine on the undertaking was not varied. The effect of the Court’s judgment, if followed in future cartel cases, is that for cartels in Ireland the criminal standard of proof remains, but the only sanction is a fine, what in many EU jurisdictions is regarded as a civil sanction. No gaol sentence was imposed and no justification provided. This is likely to undermine the effectiveness of the Cartel Immunity Programme, a vital tool for cartel detection and prosecution. Fines based on the cartel induced price rise are not only seriously underestimated by the Court, by a factor of around five, but imposed on the wrong target (i.e. the corporate officer not the undertaking). Ignorance as a defence has been revived. Victims are blamed. Bid-rigging cartels appear – unjustifiably - to be of lesser importance than other types of hard core cartels.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole-Genome Sequencing of SARS-Cov-2 in the Republic of Ireland During Waves 1 and 2
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.09.21251402; this version posted February 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Whole-genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in the Republic of Ireland during waves 1 and 2 of the pandemic Mallon P.W.G.,1, 2 Crispie F.,3 Gonzalez G.,4,5 Tinago W.,1 Garcia Leon A.A.,1 McCabe M.,6 de Barra E.,7, 8 Yousif, O.,9 Lambert J.S.,1, 10 Walsh C.J.,3 Kenny J.G.,3 Feeney E.,1, 2 Carr M.,4 Doran P.,11 Cotter P.D.,3 on behalf of the All Ireland Infectious Diseases Cohort Study and the Irish Coronavirus Sequencing Consortium. 1. Centre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland. 2. St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland 3. Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, and APC Microbiome Ireland, Cork, Ireland 4. National Virus Reference Laboratory, University College Dublin, Ireland 5. International Collaboration Unit, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 6. Teagasc Grange, Animal and BioScience Department, County Meath, Ireland 7. Dept of International Health & Tropical Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland 8. Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland 9. Wexford General Hospital, Wexford, Ireland 10. Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland 11. Clinical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland Corresponding author: Professor Patrick Mallon, Centre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research, School of Medicine, University College Dublin Tel: +3531 7164414 Email: [email protected] Key words: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, whole genome sequencing, sequencing, variant, lineage 1 NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of COVID-19 Virus Variants in Ireland
    Summary of COVID-19 virus variants in Ireland Report prepared by HPSC and NVRL on 14/09/2021 Background All medical practitioners, including the clinical directors of diagnostic laboratories, are required to notify the Medical Officer of Health (MOH)/Director of Public Health (DPH) of any confirmed, probable or possible cases of COVID-19 that they identify. Laboratory, clinical and epidemiological data, on notified COVID-19 cases, are recorded on the Health Protection Surveillance Centre’s (HPSC) Computerised Infectious Disease Reporting System (CIDR). This report summarises COVID-19 whole genome sequencing (WGS) carried out by the National Virus Reference Laboratory (NVRL) and partners. Current WGS capacity is approximately 1,000 – 1,200 specimens per week. WGS data included in this report are data received from the NVRL as of September 14th 2021 and reflect sequencing results since week 51 2020 (specimen dates between 13th December 2020 and August 30th 2021). The epidemiological data on the sequenced cases were extracted from CIDR on 13/09/2021 and supplemented by information from the COVID care tracker (CCT) database. CIDR is a dynamic system and case details may be updated at any time. Therefore, the data described here may differ from previously reported data and data reported for the same time period in the future. The interim case definition for variants of concern for public health response and an overview of the procedures for the laboratory detection of mutations or variants of concern at the NVRL are available here. The World Health Organization (WHO) working definitions for ‘SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern’ (VOCs) and ‘SARS-CoV-2 variants of interest’ (VOIs) are available here.
    [Show full text]
  • How Employee Voice Affects Employee Engagement?
    How Employee Voice affects Employee Engagement? A research across Spanish nationals working in multinational companies in Dublin (Ireland) during Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Marc Artacho Master of Arts in Human Resource Management National College of Ireland Submitted to the National College of Ireland, August 2020 Abstract This research aims to contribute to the area of Employee Voice and its relevance and impact on Employee Engagement during COVID-19 global pandemic taking an employee-centric approach for expatriates, specifically Spanish nationals, working remotely for multinationals companies based in Dublin (Ireland). The epistemology orientation taken is mainly a constructive interpretivism focused on the thinking and feeling that underpins people’s behaviour and the subjective ways in which they experience their world. This approach considers an online questionnaire with a mixture of closed-ended and open-ended questions following a mixed method research methodology. The questionnaire is broken down into three sections. The first part is to understand the current employee engagement level. The second part is defined to measure the six key management functions that are impacting the employee engagement and the third part is created to understand directly how the employee voice is impacting Spanish employees’ engagement during the COVID-19 period. In conclusion, Employee Voice impacted negatively Employee Engagement for Spanish nationals working in multinational companies in Dublin (Ireland) during COVID-19 period. On the other hand, they were satisfied with their working environment in their project, the management style of their direct manager, their co- worker relationship, their current side policies and procedures and the wellbeing measures implemented in their side but not with their current training and career development plan and their current side compensation plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Galway European Capital of Culture 2020
    Galway European Capital of Culture 2020 Second Monitoring Meeting Report by the Expert Panel Brussels, July 2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture Directorate Culture and Creativity Unit D2 Contact: Sylvain Pasqua and Gerald Colleaux E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels © European Union, 2018 Galway European Capital of Culture 2020 Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................... 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................4 Attendance ....................................................................................................4 Discussion .....................................................................................................8 Recommendations ........................................................................................ 11 Next steps ................................................................................................... 12 3 Galway European Capital of Culture 2020 Introduction This report follows the meeting in Rijeka on 28th June 2018 between the panel and Galway, one of the two European Capitals of Culture (ECOC) in 20201. Galway was designated European Capital of Culture 2020 in Ireland in September 2016 on the basis of the panel’s selection report2. Its bid-book is available on Galway 2020 website3. There was previously a 1st monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Research in the Field of Special Education on the Island of Ireland Since 2000 Joseph Travers, Rosie Savage, Cathal Butler, Margaret O Donnell
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Bedfordshire Repository Mapping research in the field of special education on the island of Ireland since 2000 Joseph Travers, Rosie Savage, Cathal Butler, Margaret O Donnell Joseph Travers, Rosie Savage and Margaret O Donnell School of Inclusive and Special Education Dublin City University Institute of Education St Patrick’s Campus, Drumcondra Dublin 9 Ireland [email protected] 353 1 8842040 Cathal Butler University of Bedfordshire Dear Editor This paper is based on a commissioned research project for the National Council for Special Education in Ireland. This paper is original and not under consideration or published elsewhere. Joseph Travers 1 2 Mapping research in the field of special education on the island of Ireland since 2000 Abstract This article describes the process of building and findings from analysis of a database mapping research and policy in the field of special education on the island of Ireland from 2000-2013. The database contains 3, 178 references organised thematically and forms a source for researchers to access non published materials such as theses. Analysis of the database reveals areas of research strength in terms of the quantity of activity and other areas with little activity. Recommendations are offered based on this analysis. 3 Mapping research in the field of special education on the island of Ireland since 2000 Introduction In educational research, a number of large national and international databases exist, which include research articles, chapters, books, and reports. These include international databases such as ERIC, and commercial databases such as EBSCO.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of Seafood Production Growth Targets
    14-WP-SEMRU-01 The Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit (SEMRU) National University of Ireland, Galway Working Paper Series Working Paper 14-WP-SEMRU-01 The Seafood Sector in Ireland: Economic Impacts of Seafood Production Growth Targets Amaya Vega1, Ana Corina Miller2,3, Cathal O’Donoghue4 1Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit, J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway 2Agri-Food and Bioscience Institute, Belfast 3Institute for International Integration Studies, Trinity College Dublin 4Rural Economy Research Centre, Teagasc For More Information on the SEMRU Working Paper Series Email: [email protected], Web: www.nuigalway.ie/semru/ 14-WP-SEMRU-01 SEMRU Working Paper Series The Seafood Sector in Ireland: Economic Impacts of Seafood Production Growth Targets Amaya Vega, Ana Corina Miller, Cathal O’Donoghue Abstract This paper examines the potential economic impact of the Irish government strategy for the development of the seafood sector in Ireland, Food Harvest 2020 (FH2020). The seafood industry accounts for a large proportion of income and employment in peripheral coastal areas. Many of these regions are predominantly rural and they are largely dependent on the primary fisheries sector. Moreover, the services and retail businesses in these areas are heavily dependent on direct spending from the fisheries, aquaculture and seafood processing sectors. A social accounting matrix (SAM) approach with (1) set to zero purchase coefficients for all directly impacted industries and (2) changes in output converted to final demand shocks is used to calculate the economic and employment impact on the rest of the economy from an increase in the output in the fisheries, aquaculture and seafood processing sectors in Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Cardiovascular Health National Cardiovascular Health Policy 2010 – 2019
    Changing Cardiovascular Health National Cardiovascular Health Policy 2010 – 2019 MAY 2010 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND CHILDREN Copyright © Minister for Health and Children, 2010 Department of Health and Children Hawkins House Hawkins Street Dublin 2 Tel: +353 (0)1 635 4000 Fax: +353 (0)1 635 4001 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.dohc.ie Published by Government Publications, Dublin ISBN 0-7557-7639-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of the copyright holder. For rights of translation or reproduction, applications should be made to the Head of Communications, Department of Health and Children, Hawkins House, Hawkins Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. ContentS Minister’s Foreword vii Acknowledgements ix Membership of the Cardiovascular Health Policy Group x Executive Summary 1 Introduction to the Cardiovascular Health Policy (Chapter 1) 2 Cardiovascular Disease – Trends in Ireland (Chapter 2) 2 Prevention and Health Promotion (Chapter 3) 3 Primary Care (Chapter 4) 6 Hospital and Emergency Care Services (Chapter 5) 11 Cardiac and Stroke Rehabilitation and Continuing Care (Chapter 6) 22 Workforce Planning (Chapter 7) 28 National Framework for Quality in Cardiovascular Health (Chapter 8) 31 1. Introduction 35 Cardiovascular Health Policy Group 36 Background 36 A vision for cardiovascular health 37 Structure of report 38 2. Cardiovascular Disease – Trends in Ireland 39 Life expectancy and healthy life years 40 Cardiovascular disease 40 Heart failure 46 Peripheral arterial disease 47 Sudden cardiac death 48 Congenital heart disease and grown-up congenital heart (GUCH) disease 48 Diabetes 48 Cardiovascular targets and trends in risk factor prevalence 49 Explaining changes in cardiovascular mortality from 2000-2006 50 Population projections and emerging cardiovascular disease trends 51 Costs 51 Summary 52 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper 121.Pdf
    INSTITUTE Populism and COVID-19: How Populist Governments (Mis)Handle the Pandemic Michael Bayerlein, Vanessa A. Boese, Scott Gates, Katrin Kamin, Syed Mansoob Murshed May 2021 Working Paper SERIES 2021:121 THE VARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) is a new approach to conceptualization and measurement of democracy. The headquarters – the V-Dem Institute – is based at the University of Gothenburg with 23 staff. The project includes a worldwide team with 5 Principal Investigators, 19 Project Managers, 33 Regional Managers, 134 Country Coordinators, Research Assistants, and 3,500 Country Experts. The V-Dem project is one of the largest ever social science research-oriented data collection programs. Please address comments and/or queries for information to: V-Dem Institute Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Sprängkullsgatan 19, Box 711 405 30 Gothenburg Sweden E-mail: [email protected] V-Dem Working Papers are available in electronic format at www.v-dem.net. Copyright ©2021 by authors. All rights reserved. Populism and COVID-19: How Populist Governments (Mis)Handle the Pandemic∗ Michael Bayerlein y z Vanessa A. Boesex Scott Gates{ Katrin Kaminy z Syed Mansoob Murshedk ∗∗ May 2021 ∗Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Vinicius G. Rodrigues Vieira and the participants of the 2021 ISA Annual Convention for excellent comments and suggestions. We thank the Korea Foundation for support of the project, “Pandemics, Health Diplomacy, and Peace Building”. This research was partly supported by the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Grant number UD2020/08217/FMR. yKiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany. zChristian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Germany.
    [Show full text]