Do Animals Have Culture?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Do Animals Have Culture? 150 Evolutionary Anthropology ARTICLES Do Animals Have Culture? KEVIN N. LALAND AND WILLIAM HOPPITT Culture is probably not rare in animals, although hard experimental evidence is some form of extra-genetic inheri- lacking. The strongest case for culture is found in the species most amenable to tance sufficient to be deemed cul- experimental manipulation, rather than in nonhuman primates. Human culture is tural. Thus, central to the issue of much more likely to be cumulative than animal culture, but the reasons for this are whether animals exhibit culture is not well established. At this point, there is no reason to assume that cumulative the problem of whether it is possible culture depends critically on teaching, imitation, language, or perspective-taking. to come up with a nonarbitrary def- Currently, animals are being judged according to stricter criteria than humans. inition of culture; one that will prove useful to a substantive proportion of interested researchers. We begin by WHY IS CULTURE RARE IN pologists seem to have given up on the seeking such a definition, and in do- ANIMALS? OR IS IT? notion of culture altogether.3,4 Ironi- ing so are guided by the twin criteria cally, and perhaps benefiting from of consensus and utility. In simple The concept of culture has become blissful ignorance of the problems, bi- terms, we are looking for the kind of a quagmire for the social sciences. In- ologists and students of animal behav- definition of culture that our profes- tuitively, we all know what it is and ior are currently giving unprece- sional colleagues will recognize as feel it to be important, yet it has dented attention to the “culture” of something with which they can proven virtually impossible for social other animals.5–7 This community has work. scientists to derive a consensual defi- witnessed an explosion of interest in The first step is to ask whether nition or to find a satisfactory means animal social learning and purported such a definition would be more use- 1,2 of operationalizing it. Indeed, after animal culture6,8 exemplified by a pro- ful if it were broad and minimalist, much painstaking self-analysis and liferation of books, conferences, and reflecting the continuity between hu- soul searching, many social anthro- papers dedicated to the topic.5,9–11 mans and other animals, or whether Whether or not the culture concept a narrow and exacting definition has utility for our own species, an in- that stresses human uniqueness creasing number of researchers are might have greater utility. We sus- Kevin Laland is a Royal Society University using it to explain both diversity and pect that to most biologically Research Fellow and Reader in Biology at minded researchers the answer to the University of St. Andrews, U.K. His transgenerational continuity of be- research encompasses a range of topics havior in animals. this question is immediately appar- related to animal behavior and evolution, In the absence of a satisfactory ent. A narrow definition, say some- particularly social learning, cultural evolu- tion, and niche construction. He is the and universally accepted definition thing like, “Cultures are systems of co-author (with Gillian Brown) of Sense of culture, most answers to the ques- linguistically encoded conceptual and Nonsense. Evolutionary Perspectives tion, “Do animals have culture?” phenomena that are learned through on Human Behavior (2002) published by Oxford University Press and (with John take on a hackneyed appearance. De- teaching and imitation, socially Odling-Smee and Marc Feldman) of Niche fine culture one way and it is the transmitted within populations, and Construction. The Neglected Process in Evolution (2003) by Princeton University exclusive province of human beings; characteristic of groups of people,” Press. E-mail: [email protected] another way, and a multitude of spe- is not likely to prove particularly Will Hoppitt is a BBSRC-funded PhD stu- cies are deemed worthy of the acco- useful, at least not to the issues ad- dent in the Department of Zoology at the University of Cambridge, U.K. His re- lade. At one pole of the spectrum, dressed in this article. This is not search includes empirical work on social many social anthropologists con- only because the answer to the ques- learning in birds and mathematical mod- tion of whether or not animals have eling of social learning processes. ceive of culture as so deeply shrouded in language, politics, mo- culture is a fait accompli; by defini- rality and institutions, that it would tion, they do not. But in addition, Key words: social learning, innovation, teaching, be grossly devalued were it attrib- this denotation would act as a bar- imitation, niche construction uted to dolphins or apes. At the other rier to understanding of the evolu- extreme, biologists Charles Lums- tionary roots of culture. It would en- Evolutionary Anthropology 12:150–159 (2003) den and Edward Wilson12 concluded courage the misguided view that DOI 10.1002/evan.10111 Published online in Wiley InterScience that in excess of 10,000 species, in- humans are (uniquely) unique, (www.interscience.wiley.com). cluding some bacteria, manifest which is only trivially true since all ARTICLES Evolutionary Anthropology 151 species are unique. No light would may vary from one population to the ture.5,10 While our particular beliefs be shed on how culture came into next. Thus, culture helps to explain are of little intrinsic value, we suspect existence, nor on human’s place in both continuity within groups and that many researchers that study ani- nature. More fundamentally, it diversity between groups. mal social learning would agree with would act as a barrier to the integra- These considerations lead us to us on this point. tion of the biological and social sci- the following working definition of To return then to our question, cul- ences. Premature, over-exacting dis- culture, toward which we hope a ture is as rare or as common among tinctions jeopardize the ability to see substantial proportion of research- animals as it is defined to be. On the relationships between culture-like ers interested in cultural evolution assumption that broad definitions lead phenomena in diverse taxa. would be sympathetic. Cultures are to greater utility and consensus than do Given the primitive state of knowl- those group-typical behavior pat- narrow ones, we have defined culture edge of animal cultures and the cur- terns shared by members of a com- according to its necessary conditions. rent malaise in human culture stud- munity that rely on socially learned This definition leads us to the view that ies, we suggest that a broader and transmitted information. (Later culture is not at all rare, although hard definition is likely to be more stimu- we will discuss addition characteris- experimental evidence of cultures lating. It may prove valuable to de- tics that some researchers regard as among animals, including nonhuman bate the criteria by which cultural essential to human culture.) primates, is currently lacking. and acultural species are distin- guished and perhaps, in time, even Which Animals Have Culture? WHAT IS UNIQUE ABOUT to make distinctions between differ- According to the preceding defini- PRIMATE CULTURE? ent classes of culture. But such dis- tion, which animals have culture? tinctions, if they are going to be in- A “Brainist” Bias? There are two kinds of answers to this formed, can be based only on question. The first kind is based exclu- A slightly (but only slightly) face- empirical data. A broad definition sively on hard experimental evidence. tious answer to the question of what is encourages such data to be collect- That is, for which species do we have unique about primate culture is that ed; a narrow definition does not. A reliable scientific evidence of natural primates uniquely benefit from the bi- broad definition has the additional communities that share group-typical ased anthropocentric perspective of advantages that it provides a com- behavior patterns that are dependent investigators who themselves, without parative framework with which to on socially learned and transmitted exception, are primates. Nonhuman investigate the evolutionary history information? The answer, which will primates are probably studied more of culture and that it encourages the surprise many, is humans plus a than most other species; the findings cross-fertilization of information handful of species of birds, one or two of these studies perhaps receive and methods between the biological whales, and two species of fish. greater attention than those of other and social sciences. Naturally, the No doubt many readers will find this species; and arguably lower standards definition could also be too all-en- conclusion disturbing, while primatolo- of evidence are required for primates compassing, so that “culture” be- gists will probably be up in arms. How than other species to be awarded comes unrecognizable and research- can we attribute culture status to fish some sophisticated psychological or ers become alienated. An overly and not chimpanzees? A full explana- social attribute, including culture. broad definition, like an overly nar- tion will follow, but the short answer is This bias, we suspect, stems in part row one, would have neither utility that for chimpanzees, as for other non- from a need dating back to Darwin for nor consensus. human primates, the hard evidence researchers to demonstrate continuity By what means can we settle on a that their “cultures” are socially learned of mental abilities between humans
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3. from Nature to “Culture”
    Georges Chapouthier The Mosaic Theory of Natural Complexity A scientific and philosophical approach Éditions des maisons des sciences de l’homme associées Chapter 3. From Nature to “Culture” Publisher: Éditions des maisons des sciences de l’homme associées Place of publication: Éditions des maisons des sciences de l’homme associées Year of publication: 2018 Published on OpenEdition Books: 10 April 2018 Serie: Collection interdisciplinaire EMSHA Electronic ISBN: 9782821895744 http://books.openedition.org Electronic reference CHAPOUTHIER, Georges. Chapter 3. From Nature to “Culture” In: The Mosaic Theory of Natural Complexity: A scientific and philosophical approach [online]. La Plaine-Saint-Denis: Éditions des maisons des sciences de l’homme associées, 2018 (generated 10 septembre 2020). Available on the Internet: <http://books.openedition.org/emsha/210>. ISBN: 9782821895744. Chapter 3 From Nature to “Culture” In the first two chapters we presented evidence of general principles involved in complexity as mosaics as seen in very different fields. It is interesting to observe that the two distinguishing features which are the pride of the human race, i.e. the brain and highly complex thought, are built on the same foundations as the rest of the living world – juxtaposition and integration. In the present chapter, I shall analyze the comparison in terms of nature and culture, with the brain referring to nature and the mind referring to culture. English-speakers often make the distinction between nature and nurture, but I prefer to use the continental word “culture”, for both humans and animals. The discussion in the previous chapter included phenomena of the mind such as language, music, drawing, philosophy and literature, and was already what I consider to be a cultural approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture in Humans and Other Animals
    Biol Philos (2013) 28:457–479 DOI 10.1007/s10539-012-9347-x Culture in humans and other animals Grant Ramsey Received: 12 March 2012 / Accepted: 30 September 2012 / Published online: 16 October 2012 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Abstract The study of animal culture is a flourishing field, with culture being recorded in a wide range of taxa, including non-human primates, birds, cetaceans, and rodents. In spite of this research, however, the concept of culture itself remains elusive. There is no universally assented to concept of culture, and there is debate over the connection between culture and related concepts like tradition and social learning. Furthermore, it is not clear whether culture in humans and culture in non- human animals is really the same thing, or merely loose analogues that go by the same name. The purpose of this paper is to explicate core desiderata for a concept of culture and then to construct a concept that meets these desiderata. The paper then applies this concept in both humans and non-human animals. Keywords Behavior Á Culture Á Epigenetic Á Evolution Á Innovation Á Social learning Á Tradition Introduction The study of culture in animals1 is a burgeoning area of research. Biologists, psychologists, and biological anthropologists are increasingly interested in the study of culture and are routinely describing the behavior of animals—from rats to sperm whales—in terms of culture (Laland and Galef 2009). Additionally, the field of 1 To avoid repeated uses of ‘non-human’, I will use ‘animal’ in what follows, not as picking out the Anamalia, but as denoting all non-human animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Culture Consequences of Sociality What Is Culture? What Is Culture? Cultural Transmission
    Animal culture Consequences of sociality Animals are exposed to behavior, sometimes novel, of others Do animals display culture? What is culture? “The totality of the mental and physical reactions and activities that characterize the behavior of individuals composing a social group collectively and individually in relations to their natural environment, to other groups, to members of the group itself and of each individual to himself” - Franz Boas (1911) “An extrasomatic (nongenetic, nonbodily), temporal continuum of things and events dependent upon symboling. Culture consists of tools, implements, utensils, clothing, ornaments, customs, institutions, beliefs, rituals, games, works of art, language, etc.” - Leslie White (~1949) What is culture? Cultural transmission “Patterns, explicit and implicit, of and for behavior acquired May occur via copying… …or via direct instruction and transmitted by symbols, constituting the distinctive achievement of human groups” - Kroeber and Kluckhohn (1952) “Learned systems of meaning, communicated by means of natural language and other symbol systems, having representational, directive, and affective functions, and capable of creating cultural entities and particular senses of reality” - Roy D'Andrade (~1984) Tool use in chimpanzees “The universal human capacity to classify, codify and communicate their experiences symbolically…a defining feature of the genus Homo” - Wikipedia (2006) Culturally transmitted behavior must persist beyond life of originator 1 Cultural transmission in macaques Cultural transmission
    [Show full text]
  • The Question of Animal Culture
    THE QUESTION OF ANIMAL CULTURE Bennett G. Galef, Jr. McMaster University In this paper I consider whether traditional behaviors of animals, like traditions of humans, are transmitted by imitation learning. Review of the literature on problem solving by captive primates, and detailed consideration of two widely cited instances of purported learning by imitation and of culture in free-living primates (sweet-potato washing by Japanese macaques and termite fishing by chimpanzees), suggests that nonhuman primates do not learn to solve problems by imitation. It may, therefore, be misleading to treat animal traditions and human culture as homologous (rather than analogous) and to refer to animal traditions as cultural. KEYWORDS:Animal tradition; Animal culture; Imitation and learning; Koshima Island (Japan); Gombe National Park (Tanzania); Nonhuman primates "Imitation is natural to man from childhood, one of his advantages over the lower ani- mals being this, that he is the most imitative creature in the world, and learns at first by imitation." (Aristotle 1941:4486) Received August 28, 1991; accepted October 28, 1991. Address all correspondence to Bennett G. Galef. Jr., Department of Psychology, McMaster Univer- sity, Hamilton, Ontario L85 4Kl, Canada. Copyright 10 1992 by Walter de Gruyter, Inc. New York Human Nature, Vol. 3, No.2, pp, 157-178. 1045-6767/92/$1.00 + ,10 157 The Question of Animal Culture 159 158 Human Nature, Vol. 3, No.2, 1992 It has become increasingly fashionable during the past decade for scien- PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION tists to see evidence of humanlike mental processes in animals as diverse as chickens and chimpanzees. The possibility that animals may be con- Lumpers and Splitters scious, deceitful, self-aware, Machiavellian, etc., is under serious con- sideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Anthropology: Basic Schools and Branches
    А 95AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY A. Zholdybayeva Zh. Doskhozhina CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY: BASIC SCHOOLS AND BRANCHES Teaching manual Almaty «Qazaq University» 2020 UDC 902/904 (075.8) LBC 63.4я73 Zh 50 Recommended for publication by the decision of the Academic Council of the Faculty of Philosophy and Political Science and Publishing Council of al-Farabi KazNU (Protocol No.1 dated 10.09.2020) Reviewers: Doctor of Philosophical science, Professor A.K. Abisheva PhD D.M. Zhanabayeva PhD A.M. Kadyralieva Zholdybayeva A. Zh 50 Cultural Anthropology: Basic Schools and Branches: teaching manual / A. Zholdybayeva, Zh. Doskhozhina. – Almaty: Qazaq University, 2020. – 122 p. ISBN 978-601-04-4880-3 This manual has been developed in accordance with the requirements of the new State educational standard for higher vocational education in the Republic of Kazakhstan. It reflects the modern state of cultural anthropology and is intended for university students. The authors of the manual tried to present the material as interestingly as possible, both in a substantive and in a methodical way. In its chapters, paragraphs are singled out, “photo frames” and font underlined will make it easier to find the necessary material, specific data, facts, original concepts and formulations, logical conclusions and assessments. The authors hope that it will be accepted by the students and will help them enter more deeply the world of culture, which is our “second nature”, a diverse, creative, intel- lectual and active form of life. UDC 902/904 (075.8) LBC 63.4я73 ISBN 978-601-04-4880-3 © Zholdybayeva A., Doskhozhina Zh., 2020 © Al-Farabi KazNU, 2020 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Intercultural Communication for Global
    INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Regina Williams Davis | 9781465277664 | | | | | Intercultural Communication for Global Engagement 1st edition PDF Book Resilience, on the other hand, includes having an internal locus of control, persistence, tolerance for ambiguity, and resourcefulness. This textbook is suitable for the following courses: Communication and Intercultural Communication. Along with these attributes, verbal communication is also accompanied with non-verbal cues. Create lists, bibliographies and reviews: or. Linked Data More info about Linked Data. A critical analysis of intercultural communication in engineering education". Cross-cultural business communication is very helpful in building cultural intelligence through coaching and training in cross-cultural communication management and facilitation, cross-cultural negotiation, multicultural conflict resolution, customer service, business and organizational communication. September Lewis Value personal and cultural. Inquiry, as the first step of the Intercultural Praxis Model, is an overall interest in learning about and understanding individuals with different cultural backgrounds and world- views, while challenging one's own perceptions. Need assistance in supplementing your quizzes and tests? However, when the receiver of the message is a person from a different culture, the receiver uses information from his or her culture to interpret the message. Acculturation Cultural appropriation Cultural area Cultural artifact Cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Van-Deurs-MA-Thesis.Pdf
    Nonhuman Mammalian Cultural Behaviors and the Animal Cultures Debate By Christian Van Deurs Queens College Department of Biology In fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Spring 2017 Master’s Committee: Advisor: David Lahti Mitchell Baker Larissa Swedell Abstract Although humans are a uniquely cultural species, many animal species have the ability to learn socially as individuals. Of these, a few have exhibited social learning that cascades through a population in a way that could be considered cultural. Chimpanzees, orangutans, humpback whales, and dolphins display clear socially learned behaviors that are practiced on a large scale, with geographical variation, and with no apparent genetic or environmental explanation for these differences. These behaviors have been described as cultural behaviors, despite the lack of a universally accepted definition of culture. An understanding of nonhuman mammalian cultural behaviors and their evolution may guide future research on the varieties and extent of mammalian culture. Introduction Currently there is no clear consensus on culture in nonhuman animals. The question of nonhuman animal culture is not a new one, and the debate has changed in several ways since its inception. Arguments against nonhuman culture were initially based upon a lack of evidence for socially learned behavior, and differences between human and animal cognitive processing. Modern arguments are characterized by disagreements over the definition of culture, mechanisms of transmission, and the question of whether human and other animal cultures are homologous or analogous. In this review, I discuss the currently contentious topics in the animal cultures debate, and describe the best documented examples of cultural behaviors of nonhuman mammal species that have assisted in the recent shift towards acceptance of socially learned and maintained behavioral transmission in nonhuman mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Conservation of Non-Humans with Reference to Whales and Dolphins: Review and New Directions
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION Biological Conservation 120 (2004) 431–441 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Culture and conservation of non-humans with reference to whales and dolphins: review and new directions Hal Whitehead a,*, Luke Rendell b, Richard W. Osborne c, Bernd Wursig€ d a Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H J1 b Gatty Marine Laboratory, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, UK c The Whale Museum, P.O. Box 945, 62 First Street North, Friday Harbor, WA 98250, USA d Texas A&M University at Galveston, 4700 Avenue U, Building 303, Galveston, TX 77551-5923, USA Received 10 November 2003; received in revised form 4 March 2004; accepted 25 March 2004 Abstract There is increasing evidence that culture is an important determinant of behavior in some non-human species including great apes and cetaceans (whales and dolphins). In some cases, there may be repercussions for population biology and conservation. Rapidly evolving ‘‘horizontal’’ cultures, transmitted largely within generations, may help animals deal with anthropogenic change and even allow them to exploit it, sometimes with negative consequences for both the animals and humans. In contrast, stable ‘‘vertical’’ or ‘‘oblique’’ cultures, transmitted principally between generations, may impede adaptation to environmental change, and confound range recovery, reintroductions and translocations. Conformist stable cultures can lead to maladaptive behavior, which may be mistaken for the results of anthropogenic threats. They can also structure populations into sympatric sub-populations with dis- tinctive cultural variants. Such structuring is common among cetaceans, among which sympatric sub-populations may face different anthropogenic threats or respond to the same threat in different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL TRANSMISSION a View from Chimpanzees and Human Infants
    JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY Tomasello / CULTURAL TRANSMISSION Human beings are biologically adapted for culture in ways that other primates are not, as evidenced most clearly by the fact that only human cultural traditions accumulate modifications over historical time (the ratchet effect). The key adaptation is one that enables individuals to understand other individuals as inten- tional agents like the self. This species-unique form of social cognition emerges in human ontogeny at around 1 year of age as infants begin to engage with other persons in various kinds of joint attentional activi- ties involving gaze following, social referencing, and gestural communication. Young children’s joint attentional skills then engender some uniquely powerful forms of cultural learning, enabling the acquisition of language, discourse skills, tool use practices, and many other conventional activities. These novel forms of cultural learning allow human beings to pool their cognitive resources both contemporaneously and over historical time in ways that are unique in the animal kingdom. CULTURAL TRANSMISSION A View From Chimpanzees and Human Infants MICHAEL TOMASELLO Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany Primates are highly social beings. They begin their lives clinging to their mothers and nurs- ing, and they spend their next few months, or even years, still in close proximity to her. Adult primates live in close-knit social groups, for the most part, in which members individually recognize one another and form various types of long-term social relationships (see Tomasello & Call, 1994, 1997, for reviews). As primates, human beings follow this same pattern, of course, but they also have some unique forms of sociality that may be character- ized as “ultrasocial” or, in more common parlance, cultural (Tomasello, Kruger, & Ratner, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Calving Interval Alfonso Guillermo Flores Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1971 A study of calving interval Alfonso Guillermo Flores Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Flores, Alfonso Guillermo, "A study of calving interval " (1971). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4452. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/4452 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 72-5200 FLORES, Alfonso Guillermo, 1929- A STUDY OF CALVING INTERVAL. Iowa State University, Ph.D., 1971 Agriculture, animal culture University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED A Study of calving interval by Alfonso Guillermo Flores A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Animal Science (Animal Breeding) Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Work Signature was redacted for privacy. For the Major^Department Signature was redacted for privacy. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 1971 PLEASE NOTE: Some Pages have Indistinct print. Filmed as received. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION REVIEW OF LITERATURE Fertility Traits in General Calving Interval Postpartum Interval Conception Length Gestation Length Summary of the Reviewed Literature SOURCE OF DATA Source of Data METHODS OF ANALYSIS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Analysis of Proportions Analyses of Reproductive Traits Analysis I Analysis II SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS LITERATURE CITED ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture As a Manifestation of Human Activity - Franz M
    CULTURE, CIVILIZATION AND HUMAN SOCIETY – Vol. I – Culture as a Manifestation of Human Activity - Franz M. Wuketits CULTURE AS A MANIFESTATION OF HUMAN ACTIVITY Franz M. Wuketits University of Vienna, Austria Keywords: Anthropology, brain capacity, coevolution, consciousness, cultural inheritance, culture, enculturation, euculture, evolution, extrasomatic continuum, genetic information, genetic inheritance, human action, intellectual information, intentionality, language, learning, natural history, nature-nurture controversy, primates, protoculture, socialization, symbols, teaching, toolmakers, tool users, urbanization Contents 1. Culture: The Human Way of Life 2. Origins of Culture 2.1 Tool-users and toolmakers: Culture in animals? 2.2 Learning and teaching 2.3 Protoculture and euculture 2.4 Culture and human consciousness 3. Nature, Human Action, and Culture 3.1 Nature vs. nurture: An obsolete controversy 3.2 Biological preconditions of culture 3.3 The meaning of language 3.4 The meaning of sociality and socialization 3.5 Genetic and cultural inheritance 3.6 The coevolutionary process 4. Culture and Cultures 4.1 A “tree” of cultures 4.2 Some evolutionary mechanisms of cultural dynamics Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Culture UNESCOhas been defined in many different – EOLSSways. However, there is agreement that human culture is both unique in the biosphere and universal in humans. Generally, it can be defined SAMPLEas an extra-somatic continuum CHAPTERS of things and events that depend on intentional behavior and symbols. When talking about culture, one has to take into account an enormous variety of cultures which is expressed in different customs, languages, writings, religious belief systems, institutions, works of art, etc. Culture is not a ‘super-organic’ entity, and cultures are not static systems; they undergo many changes due to ecological, social, and economic constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontology and Anthropology of Interanimality: Merleau-Ponty From
    AIBR Ontology and anthropology of interanimality: Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana Merleau-Ponty from Tim Ingold's perspective www.aibr.org VOLUMEN 5 Ana Cristina Ramírez Barreto NÚMERO 1 Michoacan University of Saint Nicholas Hidalgo Enero - Abril 2010 Pp. 32 - 57 Received: 11.04.2009 Madrid: Antropólogos Accepted: 25.11.2009 Iberoamericanos en Red. ISSN: 1695-9752 DOI: 10.11156/aibr.050103e E-ISSN: 1695-9752 82 ONTOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY OF INTERANIMALITY ABSTRACT: This essay explores Tim Ingold’s anthropological theory following his references to Merleau-Ponty and the concept of interanimality/interagentivity. It poses some ideas of Ingold’s “poetics of dwelling”, which he highlights from ethnographies of hunter-gatherer peoples, and how these ideas are linked to an ontological consideration which does not dissociate body and person, body and mind, nature and culture, animality and humanity. The paper reviews animal literature in Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy, and Ingold’s critique of “Anthropology of the senses”. It also gives critical clues for the ethical and political implications of this ontology. KEY WORDS: Ingold, Merleau-Ponty, interanimality, interagentivity, perception. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This piece of work was possible thanks to the support of the Center for Scientific Research at the Michoacan University of Saint Nicholas of Hidalgo, project 13.8, 2008. A pre- vious version of this manuscript was read in the “Merlaeu-Ponty Alive” International Colloquium (Morelia, 2008). I’m thankful for the comments, criticisms and suggestions of Mauro Carbone, Jaime Vieyra and two of AIBR’s evaluators. My sabbatical leave at the University of California in Santa Cruz enabled me to review and correct the manuscript, for which I would like to thank Olga Nájera-Ramírez and Gabriela Arredondo (teachers of Anthropology at the Chicano/Latino Research Center), as well as the CONACYT, for supporting my project “Charrería, power relations and popular culture: the context from another point of view”.
    [Show full text]