DOCSLIB.ORG

Laboratory Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of the Invasive Cactoblastis Cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Laboratory Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of the Invasive Cactoblastis Cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Bloem et al.: Insecticides for Control of Cactoblastis cactorum 395 LABORATORY EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR CONTROL OF THE INVASIVE CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) STEPHANIE BLOEM1, RUSSELL F. MIZELL III2, KENNETH A. BLOEM3, STEPHEN D. HIGHT4 AND JAMES E. CARPENTER5 1Center for Biological Control, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32308 2University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Quincy, FL 32351 3USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST, at Center for Biological Control, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307 4USDA-ARS-CMAVE, at Center for Biological Control, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32308 5USDA-ARS-CPMRU, Tifton, GA 31794 ABSTRACT We conducted laboratory assays of nine products registered for use on ornamental plants in Florida for their ovicidal and larvicidal activity against the invasive cactus moth Cactoblas- tis cactorum. One-hundred percent mortality (or 0% survival) of 1-day-old eggs was obtained when eggstick sections were treated with cypermethrin, spinosad, or imidacloprid. These products were equally as effective when assayed against eggs that were fully embryonated (28 days old), when cladodes of Opuntia stricta were exposed to neonates 24 hours after dip- ping, or to cladodes that were dipped and stored for 30 days before exposure. When Bacillus thuringiensis (Dipel®) was used to prevent neonate penetration into treated cladodes of O. stricta, 100% mortality (or 0% survival) was recorded in the laboratory. Key Words: insecticides, invasives, Cactoblastis cactorum, Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, cyper- methrin, emamectin benzoate, abamectin, spinosad, azadirachtin, fenoxycarb, imidacloprid, acephate, Bacillus thuringiensis RESUMEN Nosotros realizamos unos ensayos del laboratorio de nueve productos registrados para el uso sobre plantas ornamentales en Florida para su actividad ovicida y larvacida contra la polilla invasora de cactus Cactoblastis cactorum. Una mortalidad de cien por ciento (o 0% sobrevi- viencia) de huevos de 1 dia de edad fue obtenida en secciones de grupos de huevos tratados con cypermethrin, spinosad, o imidacloprid. Estos productos fueron igualmente efectivos en ensayos contra huevos con embriones completemente desarrollados (de 28 dias de edad), cuando los cladodios de nopal de Opuntia stricta fueron expuestas a neonatas (larvas recien nacidas) 24 horas después ser emergidos, o a los cladodios que fueron emergidos en insecti- cida y almacenados por 30 dias antes de ser expuestos. Cuando Bacillus thuringiensis (Di- pel®) fue usado para prevenir la penetración de las neonatas dentro los cladadios de O. stricta tratados, un mortalidad de 100% (o 0% sobrevivencia) fue registrada en el laboratorio. Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) successfully con- southern United States and in Mexico (Zimmer- trolled several species of invasive prickly pear mann et al. 2000). Stiling (2002) suggested that cacti (Cactaceae: Opuntioideae—Opuntia) in the geographical range of C. cactorum in Florida Australia (Dodd 1940), South Africa (Pettey was expanding at an approximate rate of 50-75 1948), and in many other parts of the world (Mo- km per year. However, unpublished data collected ran & Zimmermann 1984). In 1989 C. cactorum by our group suggests that the spread rate along was detected in the Florida Keys (Habeck & Ben- coastal locations in the Gulf of Mexico was closer nett 1990; Dickel 1991). The cactus moth may to 160 km per year during 2000-2003 (S. D. Hight, have arrived through natural dispersal from the unpublished data). Given this rapid rate of geo- Caribbean Islands, where it was intentionally in- graphical expansion, C. cactorum could arrive in troduced in the 1950s (Simmonds & Bennett Texas by the year 2007. Invasion and establish- 1990), or it may have been accidentally intro- ment of the cactus moth in the southwestern duced by the nursery trade (Pemberton 1995). United States and in Mexico will have serious Nevertheless, its rapid spread along the Atlantic detrimental effects on biodiversity and stability of and Gulf Coasts has raised concerns about its un- native desert ecosystems and on vegetable, fruit, avoidable impact on native Opuntia cacti in the and forage Opuntia industries in these areas 396 Florida Entomologist 88(4) December 2005 (Soberón et al. 2001; Zimmermann et al. 2000). be employed in culturally managed plantings of Even though C. cactorum was deliberately intro- Opuntia (nurseries, backyards, landscaped public duced into South Africa to control invasive cacti, lands) either alone or in combination with other spineless Opuntia is still used as fodder for cattle suppression tactics. Furthermore, insecticides and other livestock during times of drought. As could be used to treat ornamental Opuntia in such, livestock farmers manage their Opuntia nursery settings to ensure that no infested plants plantations in order to minimize losses due to in- are being sold to the public. In this paper we re- sect damage. port results of laboratory assays of several insec- The biology of C. cactorum is well documented ticides that are registered for use on ornamental (Dodd 1940; Pettey 1948; Zimmermann et al. plants in Florida. Ovicidal and larvicidal proper- 2000). Mating occurs one hour before sunrise ties of the products were examined and results (Hight et al. 2003) and eggs are laid to form spine- obtained are discussed in context of the area-wide like eggsticks, each with 60-100 eggs. Neonates management of this invasive insect. burrow collectively into cactus cladodes (pads or stems) where larvae feed gregariously and move MATERIALS AND METHODS to new pads as old ones are destroyed. Pupation occurs in plant litter or soil. The moth completes Test Insects three full generations in Florida, with peak adult flights taking place in April, July, and October Eggsticks used in these experiments came (Zimmermann et al. 2004). from a laboratory colony of C. cactorum main- Burger (1972) was the first to report on the use tained at the USDA-ARS Crop Protection and of cover sprays of methidathion and carbaryl to Management Research Unit, Tifton, Tift Co., GA. protect Opuntia plantations in South Africa The insects are reared on cladodes of O. stricta in- against attack by both C. cactorum and Dacty- side rectangular plastic boxes (25 by 17 by 8 cm) lopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Dacty- that are held in environmental chambers at 26 ± lopiidae). Subsequently, Pretorius et al. (1986) and 1°C, a 14:10 (L:D) photoperiod, and 70% RH dur- Pretorius & Van Ark (1992) assayed additional ing larval and pupal development. Cocoons are products applied either as cover sprays or stem in- collected twice per week, de-silked in a dilute jections to prevent cladode penetration by first in- bleach solution, and pupae are sorted by gender. star C. cactorum. Pretorius et al. (1986) indicated Groups of 30-50 newly emerged adults of each that cover sprays of cypermethrin gave excellent gender are placed together in aluminum screen results. However, they found that stem injections cages (35 by 35 by 35 cm) containing 1-3 cladodes of monocrotophos gave inadequate control and of O. stricta for mating and oviposition. Eggsticks were expensive and impractical to use against the are collected from the cages once per day, placed insect. Pretorius & Van Ark (1992) evaluated addi- in small plastic cups (60 ml), and maintained at tional products (mevinphos and dimethoate) as 26 ± 1°C, a 14:10 (L:D), and 70% RH until needed. both stem injections and cover sprays and discov- Under these conditions eggsticks take approxi- ered that these materials applied as sprays trans- mately 30 d to complete their development. located effectively through the plants and provided good protection against larval attack. According to Products Assayed Nel et al. (2002), the insecticides currently regis- tered for use against C. cactorum in South Africa Studies were conducted during 2004 at the UF/ include a carbamate (carbaryl), an organophos- IFAS North Florida Research and Education Cen- phate (methidathion), and two pyrethroid insecti- ter (NFREC), Quincy, Gadsden Co., FL. Nine dif- cides (deltamethrin and tralomethrin). ferent commercially available products were The current infestation of C. cactorum in Flor- tested in the laboratory for their ovicidal and lar- ida is affecting native Opuntia species distributed vicidal activity against C. cactorum. The products throughout large expanses of natural areas were cypermethrin (Ammo® 2.5 E, FMC Corpora- (O. stricta (Haworth) Haworth, O. humifusa (Raf.) tion, Philadelphia, PA), emamectin benzoate Raffinesque, and O. pusilla (Haworth) Nutall), as (Proclaim® 5 SG, Syngenta Crop Protection Inc., well as ornamental cactus plants (O. ficus-indica Greensboro, NC), abamectin (Avid® 1.5 EC, Syn- (L.) Miller and O. stricta) in urban settings (Hight genta Crop Protection, Inc., Greensboro, NC), spi- et al. 2002). Even though chemical control is not a nosad (SpinTor® 2 SC, DowAgro Sciences LLC, practical or environmentally responsible tactic to Indianapolis, IN), azadirachtin (Azatin® EC, protect the millions of hectares of natural Opun- AgriDyne Technologies Inc., Salt Lake City, UT), tia vegetation (Mahr 2001), insecticide controls fenoxycarb (Distance® IGR, Valent U.S.A. Corpo- should be evaluated for their potential use in ur- ration, Walnut Creek, CA), imidacloprid (Ad- ban settings. Leibee & Osborne (2001) summa- mire® 2 F, Bayer Corporation Crop Protection, rized information on new insecticides to be as- Kansas City, MO), and acephate (Orthene® 75 sayed for use against
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Selecting for Tolerance Against Pathogens and Herbivores to Enhance Success of Reintroduction and Translocation
    Essay Selecting for Tolerance against Pathogens and Herbivores to Enhance Success of Reintroduction and Translocation MATTHEW D. VENESKY,∗† JOSEPH R. MENDELSON III,‡§ BRITTANY F. SEARS,∗ PETER STILING,∗ AND JASON R. ROHR∗ ∗Department of Integrative Biology, The University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, SCA 110, Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A. ‡Zoo Atlanta, 800 Cherokee Avenue SE, Atlanta, GA 30315, U.S.A. §Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Biology, 301 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332, U.S.A. Abstract: Some species have insufficient defenses against climate change, emerging infectious diseases, and non-native species because they have not been exposed to these factors over their evolutionary history, and this can decrease their likelihood of persistence. Captive breeding programs are sometimes used to reintroduce individuals back into the wild; however, successful captive breeding and reintroduction can be difficult because species or populations often cannot coexist with non-native pathogens and herbivores without artificial selection. In captive breeding programs, breeders can select for host defenses that prevent or reduce pathogen or herbivore burden (i.e., resistance) or traits that limit the effects of parasitism or herbivory on host fitness (i.e., tolerance). We propose that selection for host tolerance may enhance the success of reintroduction or translocation because tolerant hosts generally have neutral effects on introduced pathogens and herbivores. The release of resistant hosts would have detrimental effects on their natural enemies, promoting rapid evolution to circumvent the host resistance that may reduce the long-term probability of persistence of the reintroduced or translocated species. We examined 2 case studies, one on the pathogenic amphibian chytrid fungus ( Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis [Bd]) and the other on the herbivorous cactus moth ( Cactoblastis cactorum) in the United States, where it is not native.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera:Pyralidae) in Florida
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2009 The Ecology of Cactoblastis Cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera:pyralidae) in Florida Kristen Erica Sauby Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Sauby, Kristen Erica, "The Ecology of Cactoblastis Cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera:pyralidae) in Florida" (2009). Theses and Dissertations. 4323. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/4323 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECOLOGY OF CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (BERG) (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) IN FLORIDA By Kristen Erica Sauby A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences in the Department of Biological Sciences Mississippi State, Mississippi August 2009 Copyright by Kristen Erica Sauby 2009 THE ECOLOGY OF CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (BERG) (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) IN FLORIDA By Kristen Erica Sauby Approved: Christopher P. Brooks Richard L. Brown Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences Professor of Entomology (Director of Thesis) (Committee Member) Gary N. Ervin Gary N. Ervin Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Graduate Coordinator of the
    [Show full text]
  • Research Notes
    Research Notes GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION AND HOST PLANTS OF THE CACTUS MOTH, CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (BERG) IN PUERTO RICO AND THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS The cactus moth, Caddblastis cadorum (Berg)1, was described from Argentina in 1885 in the genus Zophodia. Ragonot2 transferred the species to the genus Caddblastis in his 1901 monograph. C. cadorum occurs endemically in the more northern provinces of Argen­ tina: Entre Ríos, Corrientes, Santa Fe, the northern part of Córdoba, Santiago del Estero, Tucumán, Salta, Juyuy and the Chaco. In Uruguay, it has been recorded along the Uruguay and Plata Rivers from Piriápolis in the south, northward to Salta. The distribution extends from Corrientes in northeastern Argentina northward through Paraguay, where the insect has been observed at Villa de la Concepción and in the vicinity of Asunción, into the Brazilian province of Matto Grosso, where the larva has been recorded at Corumba on the Paraguay River. Heinrich3'4 discussed this species taxonomically in his 1939 and 1956 revisions of the moths belonging to the Phycitinae (Lepidoptera). The most complete account on the biological control of this species was given by Dodd6 in 1940, while Mann6 in 1969 furnished an excellent account of the distribution, host plants and biology of C. cadorum. Simmonds and Bennett7 in 1966 discussed the introduction and host plants of the moth into the Leeward Islands of the West Indies (Nevis, Montserrat, Antigua, St. Kitts). The eggs of Caddblastis cadorum are laid in chains or egg sticks generally at the end of a cactus spine (fig. 1, A). It is well known that larvae (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Dispersal Pathways During the Invasion of the Cactus Moth
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Local dispersal pathways during the invasion of the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum, within North America and the Caribbean Guadalupe Andraca-Gómez1, Eric Lombaert2, Mariano Ordano3, Rubén Pérez-Ishiwara1, Karina Boege1, César A. Domínguez1 & Juan Fornoni1 ✉ Cactoblastis cactorum, a species of moth native to Argentina, feeds on several prickly pear cactus species (Opuntia) and has been successfully used as a biological control of invading Opuntia species in Australia, South Africa and native ruderal Opuntia species in some Caribbean islands. Since its introduction to the Caribbean its spread was uncontrolled, invading successfully Florida, Texas and Louisiana. Despite this long history of invasion, we are still far from understanding the factors determining the patterns of invasion of Cactoblastis in North America. Here, we explored three non-mutually exclusive explanations: a) a stepping stone model of colonization, b) long distance colonization due to hurricanes, and/or c) hitchhiking through previously reported commercial routes. Genetic diversity, genetic structure and the patterns of migration among populations were obtained by analyzing 10 nuclear microsatellite loci. Results revealed the presence of genetic structure among populations of C. cactorum in the invaded region and suggest that both marine commercial trade between the Caribbean islands and continental USA, as well as recurrent transport by hurricanes, explain the observed patterns of colonization. Provided that sanitary regulations avoiding human- mediated dispersal are enforced, hurricanes probably represent the most important agent of dispersal and future invasion to continental areas. During the last decades, biological invasion studies have strongly benefted from the use of neutral molecu- lar markers to disentangle routes of invasion1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking the Cactus Moth, Cactoblastis Cactorum Berg., As It Flies and Eats Its Way Westward in the U.S
    Spring 2004 News of the Lepidopterists’ Society Alert: Tracking the Cactus Moth, Cactoblastis cactorum Berg., as it flies and eats its way westward in the U.S. M. Alma Solis1, Stephen D. Hight2, and Doria R. Gordon3 1Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, c/o Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, National Museum Natural History, E-517, MRC 168, Washington, DC 20013-7012, [email protected]; 2USDA, ARS, CMAVE at Florida A&M University, Center for Biological Control, Tallahassee, FL 32317, [email protected]; 3The Nature Conservancy, Department of Botany, University of Florida, P.O. Box 118526, Gainesville, FL 32611, [email protected] In 1989, Terry Dickel, a member of the Florida have followed the northward Survey, and the USDA, ARS (Agri- Lepidopterists’ Society, was collecting movement of the cactus moth. By 2002, culture Research Service) to discuss the moths on a sheet at night on Big Pine the cactus moth had eaten its way from westward movement of the cactus moth Key, Florida. He collected a very large the Florida Keys to Folly Island, South beyond Floridian borders. This moth is phycitine he had never seen before in Carolina, on the Atlantic eastern coast predicted to move into the western his extensive surveys of the Florida and to St. George Island, Florida, on states and south to Mexico once it Keys. He contacted Dale Habeck at the the Gulf coast (Hight, et al. 2002). reaches Texas. University of Florida at Gainesville who The late-instar bright orange-red, The cactus moth is currently feeding on recognized that it was the first U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Misplaced Sense of Risk: Variation in U.S
    United States Department of Agriculture A MISPLACED SENSE OF RISK: VARIATION IN U.S. STANDARDS FOR MANAGEMENT OF RISKS POSED BY NEW SPECIES INTRODUCED FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES Roy G. Van Driesche, Robert M. Nowierski, and Richard C. Reardon LEVEL OF REGULATION FISH & FUR-BEARING ANIMALS PETS HORTICULTURE ANIMALS VECTORING DISEASE BIOCONTROL AGENTS nutria LEAST REGULATED Burmese python MOST DANGEROUS kudzu smothering trees kudzu native frog killed by chytrid fungus fire belly toad thistle-feeding weevil trees being killed by nutria MOST REGULATED python eating deer LEAST DANGEROUS thistle seedhead destroyed by weevil HORTICULTURE ANIMALS VECTORING DISEASE FISH & FUR-BEARING ANIMALS PETS BIOCONTROL AGENTS LEVEL OF RISK Forest Health Assessment FHAAST-2019-02 and Applied Sciences Team July 2020 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. FHTET became Forest Health Assessment and Applied Sciences Team (FHAAST) in 2016. This booklet was published by FHAAST as part of the technology transfer series. https://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/applied-sciences/index.shtml Cover Photos: (a) nutria (Philippe Amelant, Wikipedia.org); (b) Burmese python (Roy Wood, National Park Service, Bugwood.org); (c) kudzu (Marco Schmidt, iNaturalist.org); (d) fire belly toad (Kim, Hyun-tae, iNaturalist.org); (e) thistle- feeding weevil (Eric Coombs, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Bugwood.org); (f) kudzu blanketing trees (Kerry Britton, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org); (g) native frog killed by chytrid fungus (Brian Gratwicke, iNaturalist. a b c d e org); (h) trees being killed by nutria (Gerald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests: Integrating the Sterile Insect and Related Nuclear and Other Techniques
    051346-CN131-Book.qxd 2005-04-19 13:34 Page 1 FAO/IAEA International Conference on Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests: Integrating the Sterile Insect and Related Nuclear and Other Techniques 9 - 13 May 2005 Vienna International Centre Vienna, Austria BOOK OF EXTENDED SYNOPSES FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations IAEA-CN-131 051346-CN131-Book.qxd 2005-04-19 13:34 Page 2 The material in this book has been supplied by the authors and has not been edited. The views expressed remain the responsibility of the named authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the government(s) of the designating Member State(s). The IAEA cannot be held responsible for any material reproduced in this book. TABLE OF CONTENTS OPENING SESSION: SETTING THE SCENE..................................................................................1 Area-wide Pest Management: Environmental and Economic Issues .......................................................3 D. Pimentel Regional Management Strategy of Cotton Bollworm in China ...............................................................4 K. Wu SESSION 1: LESSONS LEARNED FROM OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES...........................7 Boll Weevil Eradication in the United States...........................................................................................9 O. El-Lissy and W. Grefenstette Integrated Systems for Control of Pink Bollworm in Cotton.................................................................10 T. J. Henneberry SESSION 2: LESSONS LEARNED FROM OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES.........................13
    [Show full text]
  • Cactoblastis Cactorum
    Control Tactics Developed Against the Argentine Cactus Moth, Cactoblastis cactorum Stephen Hight – ARS Tallahassee, FL Jim Carpenter – ARS Tifton, GA and many collaborators Cactoblastis cactorum Life Cycle Adult Oviposition Pupate under/in Eggsticks old (60-100 eggs) pads or veg on soil Early instar larvae Internal feeding Gregarious larvae Cactoblastis cactorum is endemic to Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay Cactoblastis cactorum • Opuntia species from N. America became serious non-native weed 1920’s Australia: Cactus moth, was introduced from Argentina to control Opuntia spp. C. cactorum as Biological Control Agent Successful control achieved in Australia after a few years and is still effective 70 years later BEFORE AFTER Cactoblastis cactorum detections in the Southeastern United States SC MS AL GA Charleston LA 2009 2008 Mobile 2007 Pensacola 2005 Tallahassee New Orleans 2004 FL 2003 2011 Northern 2002 expansion in 2001 Farthest Western Florida Tampa Outbreak: Delta area N Peninsula 2000 south of New Orleans 1993 1989 0 50 100 200 mi Miami Oct. 1989 First Continental US Detection – Bahia Honda Key, FL Rangeland Grazing -- cattle and wildlife Nursery Plants and Landscaping Fruit and Pad Production Importance to Subsistence Farmers Historical and Cultural Importance Biodiversity Desert Habitat Approach: 1. Develop survey and trapping techniques to monitor expanding geographical range 2. Identify sex pheromone for trapping lure 3. Develop mass rearing strategies 4. Develop the SIT (Sterile Insect Technique) 5. Implement the SIT on area-wide basis Trap Type Trap Height Trap Color Best Trap white (unpainted) wing trap with sticky bottom and placed at a height of 2m MATING BEHAVIOR Female Calling - time initiate calling - success of calling action - duration of calling Male Response to Calling Behavior - time to respond to female calling - mating success - duration of mating calling mating inactive 60 50 40 30 20 Number of Females 10 0 Time – a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES: a Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices
    ToolkitUL.qkx 8/10/01 3:35 PM Page 1 INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices Edited by Rüdiger Wittenberg and Matthew J.W. Cock CABI Publishing on behalf of the Global Invasive Species Programme ToolkitUL.qkx 8/10/01 3:35 PM Page ii The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever, on the part of CABI, SCOPE, IUCN or GISP, concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published by: CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of CAB International. Copyright: © 2001 CAB International on behalf of the Global Invasive Species Programme. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purpose is prohibited without the prior written permission from the copyright holder. Citation: Wittenberg, R., Cock, M.J.W. (eds.) 2001. Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, xvii - 228. ISBN: 0 85199 569 1 Catalogue records of this book are available from the British Library, London, UK, and from the Library of Congress, Washington DC, USA Design: The Visual Group, 345 California Avenue,
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of State Bureau of Oceans and International
    United States Department of State Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Washington, D.C. 20520 4 September 2015 Dr. Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dias Executive Secretary Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade Centre 393 Saint-Jacques Street, Suite 300 Montréal, Québec, Canada H2Y 1N9 Dear Dr. Dias: In response to CBD Notification 2015-052 – Submission of Information on Invasive Alien Species Management, the United States has the pleasure of providing the attached resources on invasive alien species management. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jean Preston Acting Director Office of Conservation and Water On behalf of Barbara M. De Rosa-Joynt Chief for Biodiversity U.S. National Focal Point for the Convention on Biological Diversity Attachments: Submission of Invasive Alien Species Management Information United States COVER NOTE FOR SUBMISSION OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Use one sheet per each type of information submitted NAME OF COUNTRY or ORGANIZATION United States of America CONTACT PERSON ON TECHNICAL CONTENTS OF THE INFORMATION Name of the contact Mr. Stanley W. Burgiel person Name of her/his National Invasive Species Council organization Postal address of the c/o U.S. Department of the Interior organization 1849 C Street NW MS-3529 Washington DC 20240 USA Phone number +1 (202) 208 4163 E-mail address [email protected] TYPE OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED – Tick one information source in the right column Peer reviewed journal publication X Other publication,
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control Options for Invasive Weeds of New Zealand Protected Areas
    Biological control options for invasive weeds of New Zealand protected areas SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 199 Victoria Ann Froude Published by Department of Conservation P.O. Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand Science for Conservation is a scientific monograph series presenting research funded by New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC). Manuscripts are internally and externally peer-reviewed; resulting publications are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. Titles are listed in the DOC Science Publishing catalogue on the departmental website http:// www.doc.govt.nz and printed copies can be purchased from [email protected] © Copyright June 2002, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1173–2946 ISBN 0–478–22266–1 This report was prepared for publication by DOC Science Publishing, Science & Research Unit; editing by Geoff Gregory and layout by Ruth Munro. Publication was approved by the Manager, Science & Research Unit, Science Technology and Information Services, Department of Conservation, Wellington. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Background 6 2.1 Overview of weeds in New Zealand natural areas 6 2.2 What is biological control? 6 3. Review objectives 7 4. Methodology 8 4.1 Review of international biological control outcomes 8 4.2 Assessment and management of weed threats 8 4.3 Identification of international and New Zealand biological control work for problem weed species 8 4.4 Selecting weed species for biological control investigations 9 4.5 Preliminary biological control assessments
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: the Status of Nonindigenous Species in the South Florida Environment
    2006 South Florida Environmental Report Chapter 9 Chapter 9: The Status of Nonindigenous Species in the South Florida Environment Amy Ferriter1, Bob Doren2, Carole Goodyear3, Dan Thayer, Jim Burch4, Lou Toth, Mike Bodle, Jon Lane5, Don Schmitz6, Paul Pratt 8, Skip Snow4 and Ken Langeland7 SUMMARY Successful restoration of the South Florida ecosystem, which includes the last vestiges of a once vast Everglades hinges on being able to reverse the environmental degradation that has occurred from human activities over the last 100+ years and prevent degradation from future human activities. While it is clear through the efforts of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) and Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER) programs that numerous factors (e.g., water quantity and quality, and abundance of flora and fauna) are a factor in the restoration effort, the potential impact of invasive species has only recently become a high priority for CERP planning. In support of the collective activities of the many agencies involved in Everglades restoration and CERP, this chapter reviews the broad issues involving nonindigenous species in South Florida and their relationship to restoration, management, planning, organization, and funding. This chapter also provides an overview of nonindigenous species using a comprehensive, all-taxa format for understanding and presenting an inclusive picture of the magnitude of the invasive species threats that exists in South Florida. While detailed information on many of the included nonindigenous species is still unknown, this is the first document to provide a complete listing with species annotations for those species either known, or considered to be, serious threats to Everglades restoration.
    [Show full text]