75.5 PERCENT of TURKISH CITIZENS SUPPORT EU MEMBERSHIP the Level of Support for EU Membership Among Turkish Citizens Rose 13 Points Over the Last Year

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

75.5 PERCENT of TURKISH CITIZENS SUPPORT EU MEMBERSHIP the Level of Support for EU Membership Among Turkish Citizens Rose 13 Points Over the Last Year IKV’s Trustee Organizations: 19 65 ISSUE: 19 MAY 2016 www.ikv.org.tr / contact: [email protected] 75.5 PERCENT OF TURKISH CITIZENS SUPPORT EU MEMBERSHIP The level of support for EU membership among Turkish citizens rose 13 points over the last year. Since Turkey-EU relations have been revitalised in the context of the refugee crisis and the visa liberalisation process, this increase may be interpreted as a clear testimony of the public opinion’s support for this process. ince last year, IKV has younger age groups (18-22 age • In parallel to the increase in Scommissioned a survey which group). support for EU membership, is conducted by Realta Research • Similar to last year’s results, the the share of those believing Company with the aim of identifying main sources of information that Turkey will become an EU the level of information and as regards to the EU are Member rose from 23 percent awareness among the Turkish public traditional media tools such as to 33.8 percent compared to last opinion on the EU and further the television, newspapers and year. analysing the support for Turkey’s radio. The internet remains also • As regards to the level of EU membership. The last survey a widely-used tool to search for support granted to Turkey’s was conducted on 23-24 April information related to the EU. In EU membership, there is a 2016 in 18 provinces of Turkey with contrast, it can be noted that the rather mixed picture from the a participation of a total of 1254 official institutions of the EU and geographical point of view. With persons among which 42.6 percent Turkey are still not considered as a rate of 89.7 percent, South were women. primary sources of information Eastern Anatolia is the region among public opinion. with the highest percentage The main outcomes of this • Whilst 75.5 percent of the Turkish regarding positive expectation survey are as follows: public opinion is supporting about Turkey’s EU membership • Over the past year, the support for Turkey’s EU membership, the while the Central Anatolian region EU membership has increased to they have heard of the EU expectation that Turkey’s EU has the lowest rate of positive 75.5 percent in 2016. Whilst the before, 85 percent of participants of knowledge on the EU is high membership will actually take expectation with 65.6 percent. level of support was 61.8 percent declared that they have “none” in South Eastern Anatolia and place in the near future has • Taking into consideration the age in 2015, it can be observed that or “little” knowledge of the EU. Black Sea Regions. It can also decreased to 35.6 percent of the range, it can be observed that the the level of support rose 13 points This indicates a lack of general be observed that the level of participants to the survey and population under the age of 45 is this year. information as regards to the EU knowledge on the EU is higher only 33.8 percent expect that showing more support and has • While 9 out of 10 participants within the Turkish public opinion. within the middle age population Turkey will join the EU within the a higher rate of belief for Turkey’s to the survey have stated that • In geographical terms, the level (31-44 age group) in contrast to next five years. EU membership. PAGE 2 TURKISH BUSINESS COMMUNITY HAS LOST A GREAT PIONEER: VISIONARY BUSINESSMAN IBRAHIM BODUR PASSED AWAY AT AGE 88 orn in 1928 in Çanakkale, manufacturing, defence, till 1992. Bodur contributed We, as IKV, deeply regret BIbrahim Bodur graduated chemicals, electronics, tremendously to Turkish the loss of one of the doyens from Robert College and energy, transport, tourism economy and industry of the Turkish private sector, completed his MBA in and agriculture. Today it and has figured among the Founder and Honorary the United States. Once represents Europe’s 3rd the founders of TOBB, IKV, President of the Kale Group, he returned in Turkey, he largest and the world’s 12th TÜSİAD and DEİK. one of our Founders and founded the Bodur-Eğinlioğlu largest ceramic producer. For his outstanding at the same time father of EdirneKapı Cotton Factory in In 1962, Bodur was contributions to the Turkish our Vice-President Zeynep 1951 and then Turkey’s first elected as a member economy, Bodur has been Bodur Okay, Dr. Hacı İbrahim ceramic factory in 1976. of Istanbul Chamber of awarded in 1997 the State Bodur who has tremendously Bodur founded Kale Industry (ISO) and in 1969 Medal of Distinguished contributed not only to the Holding in 1973 which he joined the ranks of Service of the Republic economic, social and cultural constitutes one of the largest TOBB Board of Directors. of Turkey and the Turkish spheres of our country but businesses in Turkey with Between 1969 and 1975, Grand National Assembly’s also to Turkey-EU relations. a total of 17 companies. he chaired TOBB’s Executive Distinguished Service We offer our deepest The main activities of the Board. Bodur was also the Prize in 2006. He has also condolences to his family group focused on ceramics longest serving Assembly been awarded numerous and to the Turkish business along with machine President of ISO from 1976 distinctions by foreign states. community. 19 65 ISSUE: 19 MAY 2016 19 65 75.5 PERCENT OF TURKISH CITIZENS SUPPORT EU IKV CONTINUES WITH ITS HORIZON MEMBERSHIP TOUR ON TURKEY-EU RELATIONS FROM THE FIRST PAGE • Among the main reasons behind the support for Turkey’s EU ACROSS TURKEY membership are the prospect of more welfare and further economic During May, IKV continued to organise a development as well as free movement, right of settlement and series of seminars within the framework educational opportunities. These are followed by the consolidation of the project entitled “A Horizon Tour on of democracy and human Turkey-EU Relations: New Dimensions, rights. For the 18-30 age groups, the expectation of increased New Objectives” opportunity for free movement is high. On the other hand, when Turkey-EU Relations discussed explained that the refugee crisis gave analysing the reasons for opposing in the Marmara Region an important impetus to Turkey- to EU membership, the EU’s double IKV organised a seminar EU relations, especially in terms of standard approach to Turkey (21.2 in Kocaeli on 9 May 2016 in accelerating the visa liberalisation percent) and the fear that Turkish cooperation with Kocaeli Chamber process and the possibility of opening and the process which awaits Turkey. the seminar, Political Counsellor culture and identity would be of Industry (KOSANO) and in Bursa new chapters. She also pointed out In this respect, she pointed out to at the Delegation of the EU to weakened with EU membership on 9 May 2016 with Bursa Chamber that the signature of the Readmission the problems encountered within Turkey, Vincent-Guillaume Poupeau (26.8 percent) are among the of Commerce and Industry (BTSO) Agreement and the decision to the current way of functioning of the explained that the removal of the reasons coming to the forefront. respectively. modernise the Customs Union were Customs Union. She explained that visa will give the opportunity for • 35.2 percent of participants In Kocaeli, the opening speech important factors behind the new the need to revise the framework Europeans and Turkish citizens to indicated that “free movement” was delivered by KOSANO and IKV wave of dynamism in Turley-EU and the scope of the Customs Union better know and understand each would be the most important Chairman Ayhan Zeytinoğlu who relations. has arisen especially due to changes other. contribution of EU membership revealed information regarding IKV Junior Researcher Ahmet in the world trading systems and also to Turkey while 42.7 percent the various activities and projects Ceran gave a presentation regarding in Turkey and the EU’s economic and Latest developments in of participants pointed out to carried out by IKV. Within this the Turkey-EU Visa Liberalisation trade interests. IKV Senior Researcher Turkey-EU relations were assessed “new job opportunities” as the framework, he shared for the Dialogue and the refugee crisis faced Akses stressed that although Turkey in the Mediterranean Region main significant contribution. first time the results of a survey by both parties. He informed the has to align its trade policy with the IKV organised a seminar On the other hand, 13.8 percent commissioned by IKV which aims participants about the 72 criteria EU’s preferential trade regime; Turkey in Mersin on 17 May 2016 in of participants declared that EU to analyse the support for Turkey’s which need to be fulfilled by the is not included in the decision- cooperation with Mersin Chamber membership would present no EU membership among the Turkish Turkish authorities for Turkish citizens making process and the negotiations of Commerce and Industry (MTSO) benefit at all for Turkey. public opinion. The survey reveals to access the EU visa-free. He also of free trade agreements conducted and in Adana on 18 May 2016 with that 75.5 percent of the Turkish presented the main outcomes of the by the EU with third countries. This Adana Chamber of Commerce. public opinion is supporting Turkey’s third report assessing the progress creates an asymmetric situation in The seminar in Mersin was LAUNCH OF THE EU membership, compared to 61.8 achieved by Turkey in terms of disfavour of Turkey. These concerns held with the participation MTSO TRANS-ADRIATIC percent obtained in the survey fulfilling the requirements of its visa have increased following the launch Chairman Şerafettin Aşut and Mersin PIPELINE PROJECT conducted last year.
Recommended publications
  • Country Report on Turkey
    Asylum Research Centre Turkey: Country Report – Version 1 The situa�on in Turkey /shutterstock.com Seita 15 December 2016 (COI up to 7 October 2016) Cover photo © 15December 2016 (COI up to 7 October 2016) Turkey Country Report Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Main Developments since the attempted Coup d’état (July 2016) a. Overview of major legislative and political developments: i. Recent legislative developments incl. new amendments or decrees 1. State of Emergency 2. Emergency decrees a. Decree of 22 July 2016 (KHK/667) b. Decree of 25 July 2016 (KHK/668) c. Decree of 31 July 2016 (KHK/669) d. Decrees of 17 August 2016 (KHK/670 and 671) e. Decrees of 1 September 2016 (KHK/672, 673 and 674) f. Additional decrees passed g. Observations on the decrees by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights ii. Recent political developmentsin particular regarding changes affecting government structures: 1. Central Government 2. Political parties 3. Legal and judicial institutions 4. Civil service and government ministries 5. Educational institutions, including Universities 6. Hospitals / health care structures b. Overview of changes to the security forces: i. General information on the reported changes affecting the: 1. Police 2. Armed forces/Military 3. Intelligence services 4. Border guards/forces (incl. Gendarmerie) ii. Corruption withinthe security forces c. Impacts of the attempted Coup d’état on the socio-economic situation 2. Rule of law / Administration of Justice a. Access to justice i. Legal representation ii. Criminal justice system and access to fair trial iii. Due process and procedural guarantees (incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Ÿ by HAROLD RHODE Chapter 2
    Ally No More Ally No More Erdoğan’s New Turkish Caliphate and the Rising Jihadist Threat to the West Center for Security Policy Press This book may be reproduced, distributed and transmitted for personal and non-commercial use. Contact the Center for Security Policy for bulk order information. For more information about this book, visit SECUREFREEDOM.ORG Ally No More: Erdoğan’s New Turkish Caliphate and the Rising Jihadist Threat to the West is published in the United States by the Center for Security Policy Press, a division of the Center for Security Policy. ISBN-13: ISBN978-1717071675-10: 1717071678 The Center for Security Policy Washington, D.C. Phone: 202-835-9077 Email: [email protected] For more information, visit SecureFreedom.org Book design by Bravura Books Contents Foreword ................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 .................................................................................................... 5 How to Understand Erdoğan & His Neo-Ottoman Strategy to Destroy Ataturk’s Turkey BY HAROLD RHODE Chapter 2 .................................................................................................. 23 Turkey’s Partnership with the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood BY CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY STAFF Chapter 3 .................................................................................................. 51 Gülen and Erdoğan: Partners on a Brotherhood Mission BY CLARE M. LOPEZ Chapter 4 .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey: Country Report – Version 2 the Situa�On in Turkey
    Asylum Research Centre Turkey: Country Report – Version 2 The situa�on in Turkey /shutterstock.com Seita 25 January 2017 (COI up to 6 January 2017) Cover photo © 25 January 2017 (COI up to 6 January 2017) Turkey Country Report - Update Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Main Developments since the attempted Coup d’état (July 2016) a. Overview of major legislative and political developments: i. Recent legislative developments incl. new amendments or decrees 1. State of Emergency 2. Emergency decrees a. Decree of 22 July 2016 (KHK/667) b. Decree of 25 July 2016 (KHK/668) c. Decree of 31 July 2016 (KHK/669) d. Decrees of 17 August 2016 (KHK/670 and 671) e. Decrees of 1 September 2016 (KHK/672, 673 and 674) f. Decrees of 29 October 2016 (KHK/675 and 676) g. Decrees of 22 November 2016 (KHK/677 and 678) h. Decrees of 6 January 2017 (KHK/679, 680 and 681) 3. Observations on the decrees by the Council of Europe Committee, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission ii. Recent political developmentsin particular regarding changes affecting government structures: 1. Central Government 2. Political parties 3. Legal and judicial institutions 4. Civil service and government ministries 5. Educational institutions, including Universities 6. Hospitals / health care structures b. Overview of changes to the security forces: i. General information on the reported changes affecting the: 1. Police 2. Armed forces/Military 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Anayasa Değişiklik Teklifi
    TÜRKİYE BÜYÜK MİLLET MECLİSİ YASAMA DÖNEMİ YASAMA YILI 26 2 SIRA SAYISI: 447 Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi Genel Başkanı İzmir Milletvekili Binali Yıldırım ve Grup Başkanvekilleri Kayseri Milletvekili Mustafa Elitaş, Amasya Milletvekili Mehmet Naci Bostancı, Aksaray Milletvekili İlknur İnceöz, Çanakkale Milletvekili Bülent Turan ve İstanbul Milletvekili Mehmet Muş ile 310 Milletvekilinin Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasasında Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Teklifi (2/1504) ve Anayasa Komisyonu Raporu Not: Bu Sıra Sayısına; elektronik ortamda “http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/sirasayi_sd.sorgu_baslangic” internet adresindeki sorgu sayfası üzerinden erişilebilmektedir. ‒ 3 ‒ İÇİNDEKİLER Sayfa 2/1504 Esas Numaralı Teklifin - TBMM Başkanlığına Sunuş Yazısı .........................................................................................4 - Genel Gerekçesi .....................................................................................................................10 - Madde Gerekçeleri .................................................................................................................12 Anayasa Komisyonu Raporu ...................................................................................16 Muhalefet Şerhleri ..........................................................................................................46 Teklif Metni .......................................................................................................................104 Anayasa Komisyonunun Kabul Ettiği Metin ..............................................104
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Country Report
    15December 2016 (COI up to 7 October 2016) Turkey Country Report Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Main Developments since the attempted Coup d’état (July 2016) a. Overview of major legislative and political developments: i. Recent legislative developments incl. new amendments or decrees 1. State of Emergency 2. Emergency decrees a. Decree of 22 July 2016 (KHK/667) b. Decree of 25 July 2016 (KHK/668) c. Decree of 31 July 2016 (KHK/669) d. Decrees of 17 August 2016 (KHK/670 and 671) e. Decrees of 1 September 2016 (KHK/672, 673 and 674) f. Additional decrees passed g. Observations on the decrees by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights ii. Recent political developmentsin particular regarding changes affecting government structures: 1. Central Government 2. Political parties 3. Legal and judicial institutions 4. Civil service and government ministries 5. Educational institutions, including Universities 6. Hospitals / health care structures b. Overview of changes to the security forces: i. General information on the reported changes affecting the: 1. Police 2. Armed forces/Military 3. Intelligence services 4. Border guards/forces (incl. Gendarmerie) ii. Corruption withinthe security forces c. Impacts of the attempted Coup d’état on the socio-economic situation 2. Rule of law / Administration of Justice a. Access to justice i. Legal representation ii. Criminal justice system and access to fair trial iii. Due process and procedural guarantees (incl. arrest and detention procedures) iv. Legal remedies 1 b. Corruption in the judicial system 3. Human Rights issues a. Freedom of speech, expression and assembly i.
    [Show full text]
  • Erdogan's Long Arm in The
    ERDOGAN’S L ONG ARM IN THE US: Turkish Influence Operations Among American Muslims Ahmet S Yayla TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Background 5 United States, Erdogan and American Muslims 8 President Trump and Erdogan 9 Erdogan’s Intelligence in the U.S. 2010 Onward 10 Executive Summary 11 Groups and Individuals in the United States Working Closely with Erdogan Turkish Presidency of Religious Affairs (Diyanet) and the Diyanet Center of America (DCA) Introduction 12 Personnel and Budget 14 Historical Evolution of Diyanet under the AKP 16 Imam Hatip Schools (Religious Vocational Schools) Mosques and Foundations and Diyanet’s “Spy Imams” Overseas Turkey Overseas 17 International Spying Imams of Diyanet 24 The Turkish American Community Center (TACC): American operations 26 Diyanet Center of America (DCA) 29 Functions of DCA 30 Coordination of the Turkish-American Mosques 32 Affiliated Diyanet Institutions Activities Events, Training, and Panels 34 Friday Khutbah (Sermon) Invitations 35 Turkish American Religious Foundation (TARF) 38 ForumUSA – AKP Influence Operation 40 Turkish Heritage Organization (THO) 41 Funding 42 Establishment of the THO 45 The FBI Probe and Warnings about the THO Activities 47 Structure, Hierarchy, Links to Erdogan Family and Espionage 55 THO and Turkish Diplomacy/Bureaucracy in the U.S. Anti-Semitism and Hostility towards the U.S. 56 The Zakat Foundation of America (ZF) 57 Terrorism Connections: al-Qaeda and IHH 59 Close Ties with Turkish Bureaucrats and Institutions 61 Ties with U.S. Organizations 64 Muslim Groups and Individuals
    [Show full text]
  • Erdoğan's Consolidation of the AKP & Constraints of Elites in Turkey By
    The University of Chicago Personal Party: Erdoğan’s Consolidation of the AKP & Constraints of Elites in Turkey by Thomas LoCoco Blaubach August 2021 A paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Master of Arts Program in the Committee on International Relations Faculty Advisor: John J. Mearsheimer Preceptor: Gentry Jenkins Abstract This paper demonstrates a political executive’s emergence as a personalist leader within a political party through the bureaucratic means of influencing the duration of time in office of high-level cabinet elites that pose as competition and constraints to his leadership role. Due to the restrictions on a leader’s decision-making and power from the effects of “institutionalization” among cabinet elites, a leader with the intentions of becoming a personalist leader may employ the strategy of rotating elites frequently to inhibit the process from developing and restraining their individual power. This research demonstrates the use of this rotating strategy during Erdoğan’s terms as leader of Turkey. An aspect of the Turkish president’s incremental consolidation of power within the Justice and Development Party (AKP) has been by decreasing the term duration of elites in the Turkish cabinet through frequently rotating these elites from high-level positions to the extent of breaking down institutionalization and aiding his emergence as a personalist leader. Remarkably, the successful implementation of the rotation strategy is uncommon in state systems with competitive elections. By observing the increasingly short duration of the terms of Turkish cabinet elites, an element in the process of Erdoğan’s personalization of power is displayed in a nominally democratic system.
    [Show full text]
  • Geleneksel Medya Ve Sosyal Medyada Yer Bulan Türkiye-Hollanda Krizinin
    GELENEKSEL MEDYA VE SOSYAL MEDYADA YER BULAN TÜRKİYE-HOLLANDA KRİZİNİN PROPAGANDA ÇERÇEVESİNDE İNCELENMESİ Meltem ÖZEL1 Onur KARAKAŞ2 Abdullah DURMUŞ3 ÖZET Siyasal aktörler, kamuoyunun desteğini almak ve siyasi amaçlarına ulaşmak için reklam, propaganda ve halkla ilişkiler alanlarından yararlanarak siyasal iletişim faaliyetlerini yürütmektedirler. Günümüzde internet ve sosyal medya siyasal aktörler tarafından sıklıkla siyasal iletişim aracı olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Cumhurbaşkanı ve hükümet üyelerinin 11 Mart 2017 Türkiye-Hollanda diplomatik krizine dair Twitter’daki paylaşımlarının neler olduğu ve bu paylaşımlara geleneksel kitle iletişim araçlarında ne kadar ve nasıl yer verildiği sorgulanmıştır. Çalışmanın tarih aralığı 11 Mart-21 Mart 2017 olarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada Jean-Marie Domenach’in beş propaganda kuralından ve içerik analizi yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Siyasal iletişim, propaganda, diplomatik kriz EXAMINING TURKEY-THE NETHERLANDS CRISIS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF PROPOPAGANDA ABSTRACT Political actors carry out their political communication activities by using advertisement, propaganda and public relations in order to get public support and achieve their political goals. Today, internet and social media are used by political actors as political communication tools. In this study, regarding the diplomatic crisis between Turkey and Netherlands on 11 March 2017, it was questioned that what were the discourses of the President and the government members of Turkey on Twitter and how and how frequent
    [Show full text]