DOCSLIB.ORG

Country Report on Turkey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Asylum Research Centre Turkey: Country Report – Version 1 The situa�on in Turkey /shutterstock.com Seita 15 December 2016 (COI up to 7 October 2016) Cover photo © 15December 2016 (COI up to 7 October 2016) Turkey Country Report Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Main Developments since the attempted Coup d’état (July 2016) a. Overview of major legislative and political developments: i. Recent legislative developments incl. new amendments or decrees 1. State of Emergency 2. Emergency decrees a. Decree of 22 July 2016 (KHK/667) b. Decree of 25 July 2016 (KHK/668) c. Decree of 31 July 2016 (KHK/669) d. Decrees of 17 August 2016 (KHK/670 and 671) e. Decrees of 1 September 2016 (KHK/672, 673 and 674) f. Additional decrees passed g. Observations on the decrees by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights ii. Recent political developmentsin particular regarding changes affecting government structures: 1. Central Government 2. Political parties 3. Legal and judicial institutions 4. Civil service and government ministries 5. Educational institutions, including Universities 6. Hospitals / health care structures b. Overview of changes to the security forces: i. General information on the reported changes affecting the: 1. Police 2. Armed forces/Military 3. Intelligence services 4. Border guards/forces (incl. Gendarmerie) ii. Corruption withinthe security forces c. Impacts of the attempted Coup d’état on the socio-economic situation 2. Rule of law / Administration of Justice a. Access to justice i. Legal representation ii. Criminal justice system and access to fair trial iii. Due process and procedural guarantees (incl. arrest and detention procedures) iv. Legal remedies 1 b. Corruption in the judicial system 3. Human Rights issues a. Freedom of speech, expression and assembly i. Domestic legal framework (constitution and legislation) b. Freedom of religion c. Access to education d. Access to health e. Arbitrary arrest and detention f. Prison conditions g. Enforced disappearances h. Torture and other ill-treatment and abuse i. Extrajudicial and targeted killings, unlawful use of violence and harassment j. Death penalty 4. Treatment of perceived or actual members or associates of the Gulen movement and their family members since the attempted Coup d’état a. The Gulen movement – an overview b. Perceived or actual members or associates of the Gulen movement c. Business owners/company executives d. Trade Union members e. Armed forces/soldiers f. Lawyers 5. Treatment of perceived or actual opponents to the current government under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan since the attempted Coup d’état a. Treatment of journalists and other media professionals b. Treatment of civil society, human rights and political activists c. Treatment of other individuals perceived to support the attempted coup/commenting on the attempted coup 6. Change in the situation or treatment of civil servants and government officials since the attempted Coup d’état a. Police officers and intelligence officials b. Members of the judiciary c. Teachers, education ministry officials, university deans d. Clerics, preachers and religious teachers e. Staff at state ministries i. Diplomats f. Governors g. Other civil servants or government officials i. Prison staff ii. Health workers iii. Staff of regulatory bodies iv. Presidential guards 7. Change in situation of or treatment of minorities since the attempted Coup d’état a. Kurds i. Overview ii. Exclusion from the public sphere iii. Purging of civil servants 2 iv. Restrictions on freedom of expression v. Torture and other ill-treatment and abuse b. Other minorities i. Overview ii. Hate speech and violent attacks 8. Change in situation of or treatment of IDPs since the attempted Coup d’état 9. Change in the situation of or treatment of diverse individuals of sexual orientation and gender identity since the attempted Coup d’état 3 Explanatory Note This report presents country of origin information (COI) on Turkey up to 7th October 2016 on issues of relevance in refugee status determination for Turkish nationals, in particular since the failed Coup d’état and the introduction of the State of Emergency. The COI presented is illustrative, but not exhaustive of the information available in the public domain, nor is it determinative of any individual human rights or asylum claim. All sources are publicly available and a direct hyperlink has been provided. A list of sources and databases consulted is also provided, to enable users to conduct further research and to conduct source assessments. Research focused on eventsafter January 2015, particularly those which occurred between15th July 2016 to 7th October 2016 and all sources were accessed in October and November 2016. Limited COI which pre-dates the cut-off point for research has been included to provide historical context where necessary or to illustrate changes in the post-coup environmentand the following sources have been included which post-date the cut-off point given their relevance to the issues addressed in this report: ACAPS, Turkey, last updated 14 October 2016, Overview: Key Priorities Human Rights Watch, Turkey: State of emergency provisions violate human rights and should be revoked - Joint NGO Letter, 20 October 2016 Human Rights Watch, Turkey: A Blank Check Emergency Decrees Facilitate Torture - Reinstate Safeguards to Curb Abuse by Police, 24 October 2016 Human Rights Watch, Turkey: Emergency Decrees Facilitate Torture, 25 October 2016 The International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, Civic Freedom Monitor: Turkey,last updated 26 October 2016 Daily Sabah, Parliament's human rights committee head strongly criticizes HRW report on Turkey, 28 October 2016 CIA, Chiefs of State and Cabinet Members of Foreign Governments: Turkey, Last updated 8 November 2016 European Commission, COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Turkey 2016 Report, 9 November 2016 [only in relation to pre-coup police structure] CIA, The World Factbook: Turkey, last updated 21 November 2016 The following additional sources have been included, post cut-off point, that provide some insights into the provisions contained in the emergency decrees: Mondaq, Turkey: State Of Emergency In Turkey: An Analysis Of Outcome For Contractual Relationships, 25 October 2016 Daily Dot, Turkey uses emergency decree to shut down internet on 11 Kurdish cities to ‘prevent protests’, 27 October 2016 The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey, PRESS RELEASE CONCERNING THE DECISIONS ON THE DECREE LAWS ISSUED UNDER THE STATE OF EMERGENCY, 4 November 2016 Council of Europe, Venice Commission, Turkey – State of emergency decrees - Visit of the delegation of the Venice Commission, 3-4 November 2016 UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, Preliminary conclusions and observations by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression to his visit to Turkey, 14-18 November 2016, 18 November 2016 This document is intended to be used as a tool to help to identify relevant COI and the COI referred to in this report can be considered by decision makers in assessing asylum applications and appeals. However, this document should not be submitted in full or in isolation as evidence to refugee decision making authorities. Whilst every attempt has been made to ensure accuracy, the authors accept no responsibility for any errors included in this report. 4 Sources and databases consulted Not all of the sources listed here have been consulted for each issue addressed in the report. Additional sources to those individually listed were consulted via database searches. This non- exhaustive list is intended to assist in further case-specific research. To find out more about an organisation, view the ‘About Us’ tab of a source’s website. Databases consulted: 76 Crimes Assessment Capacities Project (ACAPS) Al Arabiya Al Jazeera Al Monitor – Turkey Pulse Armed Conflict Location & Event Date Project (ACLED) Amnesty International Article 19 Association for the Prevention of Torture Atlas of Torture BBC News Bianet Brookings Institution Carnegie Endowment for International Peace CHR Michelsen Institute Committee to Protect Journalists Council of Europe Death Penalty Worldwide (Cornell Law School) Delegation of the European Union to Turkey Deutsche Welle Edge Media Network Education International Eldis Equal Rights Trust EurasiaNet EuroMedRights European Centre for Minority Issues European Commission – European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (Turkey) France 24 Forum 18 Fund for Peace – Fragile States Index 2016 Gay Star News Global Gayz Hands off Cain Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research Human Rights Association Human Rights Foundation of Turkey Human Rights Watch Hurriyet Daily News Institute for Economics & Peace – Global Peace Index 2016 Institute for War and Peace Reporting Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre International Bar Association 5 International Commission of Jurists International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) International Crisis Group International Federation for Human Rights International Institute for Strategic Studies International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA) International Refugee Rights Initiative International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims Inter Press Service IRIN news Jamestown Foundation KAOS GL LegislationOnline LGBTI News in Turkey Medecins Sans Frontieres/Doctors Without Borders Middle East Eye Minority Rights Group International Organization
Recommended publications
  • Turkey Ÿ by HAROLD RHODE Chapter 2

    Turkey Ÿ by HAROLD RHODE Chapter 2

    Ally No More Ally No More Erdoğan’s New Turkish Caliphate and the Rising Jihadist Threat to the West Center for Security Policy Press This book may be reproduced, distributed and transmitted for personal and non-commercial use. Contact the Center for Security Policy for bulk order information. For more information about this book, visit SECUREFREEDOM.ORG Ally No More: Erdoğan’s New Turkish Caliphate and the Rising Jihadist Threat to the West is published in the United States by the Center for Security Policy Press, a division of the Center for Security Policy. ISBN-13: ISBN978-1717071675-10: 1717071678 The Center for Security Policy Washington, D.C. Phone: 202-835-9077 Email: [email protected] For more information, visit SecureFreedom.org Book design by Bravura Books Contents Foreword ................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 .................................................................................................... 5 How to Understand Erdoğan & His Neo-Ottoman Strategy to Destroy Ataturk’s Turkey BY HAROLD RHODE Chapter 2 .................................................................................................. 23 Turkey’s Partnership with the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood BY CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY STAFF Chapter 3 .................................................................................................. 51 Gülen and Erdoğan: Partners on a Brotherhood Mission BY CLARE M. LOPEZ Chapter 4 .................................................................................................
  • Turkey: Country Report – Version 2 the Situa�On in Turkey

    Turkey: Country Report – Version 2 the Situa�On in Turkey

    Asylum Research Centre Turkey: Country Report – Version 2 The situa�on in Turkey /shutterstock.com Seita 25 January 2017 (COI up to 6 January 2017) Cover photo © 25 January 2017 (COI up to 6 January 2017) Turkey Country Report - Update Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Main Developments since the attempted Coup d’état (July 2016) a. Overview of major legislative and political developments: i. Recent legislative developments incl. new amendments or decrees 1. State of Emergency 2. Emergency decrees a. Decree of 22 July 2016 (KHK/667) b. Decree of 25 July 2016 (KHK/668) c. Decree of 31 July 2016 (KHK/669) d. Decrees of 17 August 2016 (KHK/670 and 671) e. Decrees of 1 September 2016 (KHK/672, 673 and 674) f. Decrees of 29 October 2016 (KHK/675 and 676) g. Decrees of 22 November 2016 (KHK/677 and 678) h. Decrees of 6 January 2017 (KHK/679, 680 and 681) 3. Observations on the decrees by the Council of Europe Committee, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission ii. Recent political developmentsin particular regarding changes affecting government structures: 1. Central Government 2. Political parties 3. Legal and judicial institutions 4. Civil service and government ministries 5. Educational institutions, including Universities 6. Hospitals / health care structures b. Overview of changes to the security forces: i. General information on the reported changes affecting the: 1. Police 2. Armed forces/Military 3.

  • Anayasa Değişiklik Teklifi

    TÜRKİYE BÜYÜK MİLLET MECLİSİ YASAMA DÖNEMİ YASAMA YILI 26 2 SIRA SAYISI: 447 Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi Genel Başkanı İzmir Milletvekili Binali Yıldırım ve Grup Başkanvekilleri Kayseri Milletvekili Mustafa Elitaş, Amasya Milletvekili Mehmet Naci Bostancı, Aksaray Milletvekili İlknur İnceöz, Çanakkale Milletvekili Bülent Turan ve İstanbul Milletvekili Mehmet Muş ile 310 Milletvekilinin Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasasında Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Teklifi (2/1504) ve Anayasa Komisyonu Raporu Not: Bu Sıra Sayısına; elektronik ortamda “http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/sirasayi_sd.sorgu_baslangic” internet adresindeki sorgu sayfası üzerinden erişilebilmektedir. ‒ 3 ‒ İÇİNDEKİLER Sayfa 2/1504 Esas Numaralı Teklifin - TBMM Başkanlığına Sunuş Yazısı .........................................................................................4 - Genel Gerekçesi .....................................................................................................................10 - Madde Gerekçeleri .................................................................................................................12 Anayasa Komisyonu Raporu ...................................................................................16 Muhalefet Şerhleri ..........................................................................................................46 Teklif Metni .......................................................................................................................104 Anayasa Komisyonunun Kabul Ettiği Metin ..............................................104
  • 75.5 PERCENT of TURKISH CITIZENS SUPPORT EU MEMBERSHIP the Level of Support for EU Membership Among Turkish Citizens Rose 13 Points Over the Last Year

    75.5 PERCENT of TURKISH CITIZENS SUPPORT EU MEMBERSHIP the Level of Support for EU Membership Among Turkish Citizens Rose 13 Points Over the Last Year

    IKV’s Trustee Organizations: 19 65 ISSUE: 19 MAY 2016 www.ikv.org.tr / contact: [email protected] 75.5 PERCENT OF TURKISH CITIZENS SUPPORT EU MEMBERSHIP The level of support for EU membership among Turkish citizens rose 13 points over the last year. Since Turkey-EU relations have been revitalised in the context of the refugee crisis and the visa liberalisation process, this increase may be interpreted as a clear testimony of the public opinion’s support for this process. ince last year, IKV has younger age groups (18-22 age • In parallel to the increase in Scommissioned a survey which group). support for EU membership, is conducted by Realta Research • Similar to last year’s results, the the share of those believing Company with the aim of identifying main sources of information that Turkey will become an EU the level of information and as regards to the EU are Member rose from 23 percent awareness among the Turkish public traditional media tools such as to 33.8 percent compared to last opinion on the EU and further the television, newspapers and year. analysing the support for Turkey’s radio. The internet remains also • As regards to the level of EU membership. The last survey a widely-used tool to search for support granted to Turkey’s was conducted on 23-24 April information related to the EU. In EU membership, there is a 2016 in 18 provinces of Turkey with contrast, it can be noted that the rather mixed picture from the a participation of a total of 1254 official institutions of the EU and geographical point of view.
  • Turkey Country Report

    Turkey Country Report

    15December 2016 (COI up to 7 October 2016) Turkey Country Report Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Main Developments since the attempted Coup d’état (July 2016) a. Overview of major legislative and political developments: i. Recent legislative developments incl. new amendments or decrees 1. State of Emergency 2. Emergency decrees a. Decree of 22 July 2016 (KHK/667) b. Decree of 25 July 2016 (KHK/668) c. Decree of 31 July 2016 (KHK/669) d. Decrees of 17 August 2016 (KHK/670 and 671) e. Decrees of 1 September 2016 (KHK/672, 673 and 674) f. Additional decrees passed g. Observations on the decrees by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights ii. Recent political developmentsin particular regarding changes affecting government structures: 1. Central Government 2. Political parties 3. Legal and judicial institutions 4. Civil service and government ministries 5. Educational institutions, including Universities 6. Hospitals / health care structures b. Overview of changes to the security forces: i. General information on the reported changes affecting the: 1. Police 2. Armed forces/Military 3. Intelligence services 4. Border guards/forces (incl. Gendarmerie) ii. Corruption withinthe security forces c. Impacts of the attempted Coup d’état on the socio-economic situation 2. Rule of law / Administration of Justice a. Access to justice i. Legal representation ii. Criminal justice system and access to fair trial iii. Due process and procedural guarantees (incl. arrest and detention procedures) iv. Legal remedies 1 b. Corruption in the judicial system 3. Human Rights issues a. Freedom of speech, expression and assembly i.
  • Erdogan's Long Arm in The

    Erdogan's Long Arm in The

    ERDOGAN’S L ONG ARM IN THE US: Turkish Influence Operations Among American Muslims Ahmet S Yayla TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Background 5 United States, Erdogan and American Muslims 8 President Trump and Erdogan 9 Erdogan’s Intelligence in the U.S. 2010 Onward 10 Executive Summary 11 Groups and Individuals in the United States Working Closely with Erdogan Turkish Presidency of Religious Affairs (Diyanet) and the Diyanet Center of America (DCA) Introduction 12 Personnel and Budget 14 Historical Evolution of Diyanet under the AKP 16 Imam Hatip Schools (Religious Vocational Schools) Mosques and Foundations and Diyanet’s “Spy Imams” Overseas Turkey Overseas 17 International Spying Imams of Diyanet 24 The Turkish American Community Center (TACC): American operations 26 Diyanet Center of America (DCA) 29 Functions of DCA 30 Coordination of the Turkish-American Mosques 32 Affiliated Diyanet Institutions Activities Events, Training, and Panels 34 Friday Khutbah (Sermon) Invitations 35 Turkish American Religious Foundation (TARF) 38 ForumUSA – AKP Influence Operation 40 Turkish Heritage Organization (THO) 41 Funding 42 Establishment of the THO 45 The FBI Probe and Warnings about the THO Activities 47 Structure, Hierarchy, Links to Erdogan Family and Espionage 55 THO and Turkish Diplomacy/Bureaucracy in the U.S. Anti-Semitism and Hostility towards the U.S. 56 The Zakat Foundation of America (ZF) 57 Terrorism Connections: al-Qaeda and IHH 59 Close Ties with Turkish Bureaucrats and Institutions 61 Ties with U.S. Organizations 64 Muslim Groups and Individuals
  • Erdoğan's Consolidation of the AKP & Constraints of Elites in Turkey By

    Erdoğan's Consolidation of the AKP & Constraints of Elites in Turkey By

    The University of Chicago Personal Party: Erdoğan’s Consolidation of the AKP & Constraints of Elites in Turkey by Thomas LoCoco Blaubach August 2021 A paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Master of Arts Program in the Committee on International Relations Faculty Advisor: John J. Mearsheimer Preceptor: Gentry Jenkins Abstract This paper demonstrates a political executive’s emergence as a personalist leader within a political party through the bureaucratic means of influencing the duration of time in office of high-level cabinet elites that pose as competition and constraints to his leadership role. Due to the restrictions on a leader’s decision-making and power from the effects of “institutionalization” among cabinet elites, a leader with the intentions of becoming a personalist leader may employ the strategy of rotating elites frequently to inhibit the process from developing and restraining their individual power. This research demonstrates the use of this rotating strategy during Erdoğan’s terms as leader of Turkey. An aspect of the Turkish president’s incremental consolidation of power within the Justice and Development Party (AKP) has been by decreasing the term duration of elites in the Turkish cabinet through frequently rotating these elites from high-level positions to the extent of breaking down institutionalization and aiding his emergence as a personalist leader. Remarkably, the successful implementation of the rotation strategy is uncommon in state systems with competitive elections. By observing the increasingly short duration of the terms of Turkish cabinet elites, an element in the process of Erdoğan’s personalization of power is displayed in a nominally democratic system.
  • Geleneksel Medya Ve Sosyal Medyada Yer Bulan Türkiye-Hollanda Krizinin

    Geleneksel Medya Ve Sosyal Medyada Yer Bulan Türkiye-Hollanda Krizinin

    GELENEKSEL MEDYA VE SOSYAL MEDYADA YER BULAN TÜRKİYE-HOLLANDA KRİZİNİN PROPAGANDA ÇERÇEVESİNDE İNCELENMESİ Meltem ÖZEL1 Onur KARAKAŞ2 Abdullah DURMUŞ3 ÖZET Siyasal aktörler, kamuoyunun desteğini almak ve siyasi amaçlarına ulaşmak için reklam, propaganda ve halkla ilişkiler alanlarından yararlanarak siyasal iletişim faaliyetlerini yürütmektedirler. Günümüzde internet ve sosyal medya siyasal aktörler tarafından sıklıkla siyasal iletişim aracı olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Cumhurbaşkanı ve hükümet üyelerinin 11 Mart 2017 Türkiye-Hollanda diplomatik krizine dair Twitter’daki paylaşımlarının neler olduğu ve bu paylaşımlara geleneksel kitle iletişim araçlarında ne kadar ve nasıl yer verildiği sorgulanmıştır. Çalışmanın tarih aralığı 11 Mart-21 Mart 2017 olarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada Jean-Marie Domenach’in beş propaganda kuralından ve içerik analizi yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Siyasal iletişim, propaganda, diplomatik kriz EXAMINING TURKEY-THE NETHERLANDS CRISIS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF PROPOPAGANDA ABSTRACT Political actors carry out their political communication activities by using advertisement, propaganda and public relations in order to get public support and achieve their political goals. Today, internet and social media are used by political actors as political communication tools. In this study, regarding the diplomatic crisis between Turkey and Netherlands on 11 March 2017, it was questioned that what were the discourses of the President and the government members of Turkey on Twitter and how and how frequent