Análisis De Las Propuestas De Enmienda a Los Apéndices De CITES De UICN/TRAFFIC Para La 17E Reunión De La Conferencia De Las Partes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Análisis De Las Propuestas De Enmienda a Los Apéndices De CITES De UICN/TRAFFIC Para La 17E Reunión De La Conferencia De Las Partes Análisis de las Propuestas de Enmienda a los Apéndices de CITES de UICN/TRAFFIC para la 17e Reunión de la Conferencia de las Partes Johannesburgo, Sudáfrica 24 septiembre–5 octubre 2016 Preparados por el Programa de las Especies de la UICN y la Comisión de Supervivencia de las Especies de la UICN y TRAFFIC N Á L I S I S A Análisis de las propuestas de enmienda a los Apéndices de CITES de UICN/TRAFFIC para la 17e Reunión de la Conferencia de las Partes Johannesburgo, Sudáfrica 24 septiembre–5 octubre 2016 Preparados por el Programa de las Especies de la UICN y la Comisión de Supervivencia de las Especies de la UICN y TRAFFIC With the financial support of the EU Austria, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Ministry of the Environment of Finland Ministry of External Affairs and Cooperation Germany, Federal Ministry for the France, Ministry of Environment, Environment, Nature Conservation and Energy and the Sea Nuclear Safety Netherlands, CITES Management Authority, Ministry of Economic Affairs España - Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad New Zealand, Department of Conservation Naturvårdsverket – Swedish Environmental Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office FSVO, Protection Agency, Scientific Authority of CITES Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA United States, U.S Fish & Wildlife Service La elaboración de los Análisis de las Propuestas de Enmienda a los Apéndices de la CITES de UICN/TRAFFIC 2016 ha sido posible gracias al apoyo de los organismos siguientes: Alemania – Ministerio Federal de Medio Ambiente, Conservación de la Naturaleza y Seguridad Nuclear (BMU) Austria – Ministerio Federal de Agricultura, Silvicultura, Medio Ambiente y Gestión del Agua Canadá – Environment and Climate Change Canada Comisión Europea – Dirección General de Medio Ambiente España – Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad Estados Unidos de América – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Finlandia – Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Francia – Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Energía y el Mar Mónaco – Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y Cooperación Nueva Zelanda – Departamento de Conservación Países Bajos – Autoridad Administrativa CITES, Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos Suecia – Autoridad Científica CITES, Naturvärdsverket – Agencia Sueca de Protección del Medio Ambiente Suiza – Oficina Federal de Seguridad Alimentaria y Veterinaria, Departamento Federal del Interior La UICN, Unión Internacional par la Conservación de la Naturaleza, contribuye a encontrar soluciones pragmáticas para los principales desafíos ambientales y de desarrollo que enfrenta el planeta. El trabajo de la UICN se centra en valorar y conservar la naturaleza, en asegurar la gobernanza efectiva y equitativa en su utilización, y en la aplicación de soluciones basadas en la naturaleza a los desafíos globales en el clima, la alimentación y el desarrollo. La UICN apoya la investigación científica, gestiona proyectos de campo en todo el mundo, y reúne a los gobiernos, las ONG, las Naciones Unidas y las empresas con miras a desarrollar políticas, legislación y prácticas óptimas. La UICN es la organización medioambiental más antigua y más grande del mundo, con más de 1.200 miembros, gubernamentales y no gubernamentales, y más de 16.000 expertos voluntarios en unos 160 países. Para su labor, la UICN cuenta con el apoyo de un personal compuesto por más de 1.000 empleados, repartidos en más de 50 oficinas, y cientos de asociados de los sectores público, no gubernamental y privado de todo el mundo. La Comisión de Supervivencia de Especies (CSE) es la mayor de las seis comisiones de voluntarios de la UICN y cuenta con más de 10.000 expertos miembros de todo el mundo. La CSE presta asesoramiento a la UICN y a sus miembros acerca de una amplia gama de aspectos científicos y técnicos de la conservación de las especies y se consagra a la tarea de asegurar el futuro de la biodiversidad. La CSE hace aportaciones significativas a los acuerdos internacionales relativos a la conservación de la biodiversidad. TRAFFIC, la red de vigilancia del comercio de especies silvestres, tiene como objetivo garantizar que el comercio de especies silvestres no suponga una amenaza para la conservación de la naturaleza. TRAFFIC es una alianza estratégica entre la UICN y WWF. Citación: UICN y TRAFFIC (2016). Análisis de las Propuestas de Enmienda a los Apéndices de la CITES de UICN/TRAFFIC. Preparados por el Programa de Especies de la UICN y TRAFFIC para la Decimoséptima Reunión de la Conferencia de las Partes en la CITES. UICN – Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Gland, Suiza. Las designaciones de entidades geográficas de este documento y la presentación del material no implican la expresión de opinión alguna por parte de la UICN o de TRAFFIC respecto de la situación jurídica de ningún país o región o de sus autoridades, ni de la demarcación de sus fronteras o límites. i INTRODUCCIÓN La CITES (Convención sobre el Comercio Internacional de Especies Amenazadas de Fauna y Flora Silvestres) se abrió a la firma el 3 de marzo de 1973 en Washington DC. Cuando se preparó la presente publicación contaba con 1821 Partes en todo el mundo. Para que la CITES pueda seguir siendo un instrumento creíble para la conservación de las especies que son objeto de comercio, las decisiones de las Partes deben estar basadas en los mejores datos científicos y técnicos disponibles. Reconociendo lo anterior, la UICN y TRAFFIC han acometido la elaboración de análisis técnicos de las propuestas de enmienda a los Apéndices de la CITES. Los Análisis arriba mencionados tienen el objetivo de proporcionar una evaluación lo más objetiva posible de cada propuesta con arreglo a las disposiciones de la Convención sobre los criterios de inclusión desarrollados en la Resolución Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CdP16) y en otras resoluciones y decisiones pertinentes. Desgraciadamente, debido al contexto difícil para la recaudación de fondos y al gran número de propuestas, no fue posible recaudar los fondos necesarios para realizar los Análisis y presentarlos de la misma manera que en reuniones anteriores de la Conferencia de las Partes (CdP). En consecuencia, en vez de preparar para cada propuesta el apartado del resumen y su tabla correspondiente con información muy detallada, como se ha hecho en años anteriores, para la CdP17 se ha preparado un apartado del resumen sobre cada propuesta. Además, el tiempo disponible para realizar las investigaciones y consultar a los expertos ha sido inferior al de ediciones previas de los Análisis, por lo que estos no son tan exhaustivos. Por otra parte, a fin de garantizar que los Análisis estuvieran listos a tiempo para ayudar a las Partes a adoptar sus decisiones, los documentos resumidos se publicaron en Internet diez semanas después de la fecha límite para presentar las propuestas en vez de doce semanas después como en años anteriores, en respuesta a solicitudes de las Partes. Para lograr el máximo acceso de las Partes a los Análisis, se ha procurado mejorar su difusión mediante la creación de una página web personalizada en la que se pueden descargar los Análisis por separado o en su totalidad (véase http://citesanalyses.iucn.org/). En el apartado del resumen se presenta una síntesis de la información disponible extraída de la justificación de la propuesta y de otras fuentes y, en un párrafo aparte, se facilita análisis específico en el que se estudia si se puede considerar que la propuesta cumple o no los criterios pertinentes de la Resolución Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP16) u otras resoluciones relevantes de la CITES. Se ha recabado información sobre el estado y la biología de las especies consultando a la red de Grupos de Especialistas de la Comisión de Supervivencia de Especies de la UICN y a la comunidad científica en general. Esa información se ha utilizado para evaluar las propuestas y la información aportada por sus autores con arreglo a los criterios de inclusión de CITES. TRAFFIC ha utilizado sus propias fuentes de información sobre el comercio y redes de expertos. El documento resultante reúne un amplio espectro de conocimientos, que confiamos sea de utilidad en la discusión sobre las propuestas. Tras finalizar el plazo para la presentación de las propuestas de enmienda por las Partes (27 de abril de 2016), el equipo encargado de los Análisis recopiló la información disponible para preparar un primer borrador del apartado del resumen. Se envió la información recopilada, junto con una serie de preguntas y aclaraciones adicionales, a distintos expertos evaluadores para que estos aportaran sus comentarios en los casos pertinentes, particularmente sobre la exactitud y fiabilidad de la información presentada. El apartado “Análisis” de cada propuesta se terminó al final del proceso, por lo que no se envió a los evaluadores externos. El Equipo de los Análisis de UICN/TRAFFIC acepta toda la responsabilidad por el contenido de dicho apartado. Los evaluadores externos no reciben el análisis realizado en función de los criterios pertinentes ni tienen responsabilidad alguna por él. Los revisores denominados “Evaluadores de la información del resumen” (citados como Revisores en ediciones anteriores) solo han analizado la información recopilada por el equipo responsable de los Análisis en el apartado del resumen para comprobar la exactitud de la información y verificar si había omisiones. El texto definitivo expresado en esta publicación no refleja necesariamente la opinión de la UICN o de TRAFFIC ni de los evaluadores como grupo. Para satisfacer la necesidad de información de las Partes mucho antes de la CdP, los Análisis se finalizaron y publicaron en Internet el 6 de julio de 2016. Los párrafos del Resumen y el Análisis van a ser traducidos al español y francés y se publicarán en línea lo antes posible. Las versiones impresas de los párrafos de 1 A fecha de 20 de junio de 2016 según https://cites.org/eng/disc/parties/chronolo.php ii Resumen y Análisis en español, francés e inglés estarán disponibles en la CoP17 en Johannesburgo (Sudáfrica).
Recommended publications
  • Full Text in Pdf Format
    Vol. 78: 87–95, 2007 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published December 13 doi: 10.3354/dao01861 Dis Aquat Org Survey for the amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Hong Kong in native amphibians and in the international amphibian trade Jodi J. L. Rowley1, 5,*, Simon Kin Fung Chan2, Wing Sze Tang2, Richard Speare3, Lee F. Skerratt 4, Ross A. Alford1, Ka Shing Cheung 2, Ching Yee Ho2, Ruth Campbell4 1School of Marine and Tropical Biology and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811 2Herpetofauna Working Group, Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 7/F, Cheung Sha Wan Government Offices, 303 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China 3School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811 4School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811 5Present address: Conservation International Indo-Burma, PO Box 1356, Phnom Penh, Cambodia ABSTRACT: Chytridiomycosis, caused by the pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, is respon- sible for many amphibian declines and has been identified in wild amphibian populations on all con- tinents where they exist, except for Asia. In order to assess whether B. dendrobatidis is present on the native amphibians of Hong Kong, we sampled wild populations of Amolops hongkongensis, Paa exil- ispinosa, P. spinosa and Rana chloronota during 2005–2006. Amphibians infected with B. dendro- batidis have been found in the international trade, so we also examined the extent and nature of the amphibian trade in Hong Kong during 2005–2006, and assessed whether B.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyses of Proposals to Amend
    CoP17 Prop. 38 Inclusion of False Tomato Frog Dyscophus guineti and Antsouhy Tomato Frog D. insularis in Appendix II Proponent: Madagascar Summary: The False Tomato Frog Dyscophus guineti and the Antsouhy Tomato Frog D. insularis comprise two of three species in the genus Dyscophus, all of which are endemic to Madagascar. The third species, D. antongilii was included in Appendix I in 1987. It is subject to a separate proposal to be transferred from Appendix I to Appendix II (Proposal 37). All three are attractive red-orange coloured frogs. Dyscophus are known to breed explosively with the availability of water during the rainy season (typically January-March) and during that time they can be found in abundance at breeding sites. Hundreds of eggs are laid in water following mating. Dyscophus guineti The known distribution of D. guineti includes a number of patches in the remnant central eastern rainforest of Madagascar. The species is secretive and believed likely to be more widespread than records indicate1. Overall population is unknown; locally the species can vary from extremely common to very rare1. Sexual maturity is attained between two and four years, comparatively earlier in males than in females2. The habitat of the species is affected by conversion of forest to agriculture, timber extraction, charcoal production and potentially small-scale mining activities. The species reportedly does not tolerate severe degredation1. There is not known to be local use of the species. As a consequence of the Appendix-I listing in 1987 of the similar Dyscophus antongilii, collectors interested in "red Dyscophus" have shifted their attention to D.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-National Conservation of Alligator Lizards
    MULTI-NATIONAL CONSERVATION OF ALLIGATOR LIZARDS: APPLIED SOCIOECOLOGICAL LESSONS FROM A FLAGSHIP GROUP by ADAM G. CLAUSE (Under the Direction of John Maerz) ABSTRACT The Anthropocene is defined by unprecedented human influence on the biosphere. Integrative conservation recognizes this inextricable coupling of human and natural systems, and mobilizes multiple epistemologies to seek equitable, enduring solutions to complex socioecological issues. Although a central motivation of global conservation practice is to protect at-risk species, such organisms may be the subject of competing social perspectives that can impede robust interventions. Furthermore, imperiled species are often chronically understudied, which prevents the immediate application of data-driven quantitative modeling approaches in conservation decision making. Instead, real-world management goals are regularly prioritized on the basis of expert opinion. Here, I explore how an organismal natural history perspective, when grounded in a critique of established human judgements, can help resolve socioecological conflicts and contextualize perceived threats related to threatened species conservation and policy development. To achieve this, I leverage a multi-national system anchored by a diverse, enigmatic, and often endangered New World clade: alligator lizards. Using a threat analysis and status assessment, I show that one recent petition to list a California alligator lizard, Elgaria panamintina, under the US Endangered Species Act often contradicts the best available science.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Rapid-Field Identification of Dalbergia Woods and Rosewood Oil by NIRS Technology –NIRS ID
    Project Rapid-Field Identification of Dalbergia Woods and Rosewood Oil by NIRS Technology –NIRS ID. The project has been financed by the CITES Secretariat with funds from the European Union Consulting objectives: TO SELECT INTERNATIONAL OR NATIONAL XYLARIUM OR WOOD COLLECTIONS REGISTERED AT THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOOD ANATOMISTS – IAWA THAT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF SPECIES AND SPECIMENS OF THE GENUS DALBERGIA TO BE ANALYZED BY NIRS TECHNOLOGY. Consultant: VERA TERESINHA RAUBER CORADIN Dra English translation: ADRIANA COSTA Dra Affiliations: - Forest Products Laboratory, Brazilian Forest Service (LPF-SFB) - Laboratory of Automation, Chemometrics and Environmental Chemistry, University of Brasília (AQQUA – UnB) - Forest Technology and Geoprocessing Foundation - FUNTEC-DF MAY, 2020 Brasília – Brazil 1 Project number: S1-32QTL-000018 Host Country: Brazilian Government Executive agency: Forest Technology and Geoprocessing Foundation - FUNTEC Project coordinator: Dra. Tereza C. M. Pastore Project start: September 2019 Project duration: 24 months 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 05 2. THE SPECIES OF THE GENUS DALBERGIA 05 3. MATERIAL AND METHODS 3.1 NIRS METHODOLOGY AND SPECTRA COLLECTION 07 3.2 CRITERIA FOR SELECTING XYLARIA TO BE VISITED TO OBTAIN SPECTRAS 07 3 3 TERMINOLOGY 08 4. RESULTS 4.1 CONTACTED XYLARIA FOR COLLECTION SURVEY 10 4.1.1 BRAZILIAN XYLARIA 10 4.1.2 INTERNATIONAL XYLARIA 11 4.2 SELECTED XYLARIA 11 4.3 RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF DALBERGIA SAMPLES IN THE BRAZILIAN XYLARIA 13 4.4 RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF DALBERGIA SAMPLES IN THE INTERNATIONAL XYLARIA 14 5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19 6. REFERENCES 20 APPENDICES 22 APPENDIX I DALBERGIA IN BRAZILIAN XYLARIA 22 CACAO RESEARCH CENTER – CEPECw 22 EMÍLIO GOELDI MUSEUM – M.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Guidelines for Reptiles and Amphibians Used in Outreach
    RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS USED IN OUTREACH PROGRAMS Compiled by Diane Barber, Fort Worth Zoo Originally posted September 2003; updated February 2008 INTRODUCTION This document has been created by the AZA Reptile and Amphibian Taxon Advisory Groups to be used as a resource to aid in the development of institutional outreach programs. Within this document are lists of species that are commonly used in reptile and amphibian outreach programs. With over 12,700 species of reptiles and amphibians in existence today, it is obvious that there are numerous combinations of species that could be safely used in outreach programs. It is not the intent of these Taxon Advisory Groups to produce an all-inclusive or restrictive list of species to be used in outreach. Rather, these lists are intended for use as a resource and are some of the more common species that have been safely used in outreach programs. A few species listed as potential outreach animals have been earmarked as controversial by TAG members for various reasons. In each case, we have made an effort to explain debatable issues, enabling staff members to make informed decisions as to whether or not each animal is appropriate for their situation and the messages they wish to convey. It is hoped that during the species selection process for outreach programs, educators, collection managers, and other zoo staff work together, using TAG Outreach Guidelines, TAG Regional Collection Plans, and Institutional Collection Plans as tools. It is well understood that space in zoos is limited and it is important that outreach animals are included in institutional collection plans and incorporated into conservation programs when feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop17 Prop. 37
    Original language: English CoP17 Prop. 37 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September – 5 October 2016 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Downlisting of Dyscophus antongilii from Appendix I to Appendix II B. Proponent Madagascar* C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Amphibia 1.2 Order: Anura 1.3 Family: Microhylidae Gunther 1859, subfamily Dyscophinae 1.4 Genus, species: Dyscophus antongilii Grandidieri 1877 1.5 Scientific synonyms: 1.6 Common names: English: Tomato Frog French: La grenouille tomate, crapaud rouge de Madagascar Malagasy: Sahongoangoana, Sangongogna, Sahogongogno (and similar writings) 2. Overview The genus Dyscophus contains three species of large microhylids composing the subfamily Dyscophinae endemic to Madagascar. D. antongilii, D. guineti and D. insularis. Dyscophus antongilii is red-orange in coloration and commonly called the tomato frogs because of its appearance. It is well-known and iconic amphibian species. Described by Alfred Grandidier in the 1877, D. antongilii occurs in a moderate area of northeast and east of Madagascar. Dyscophus antongilii has been listed within CITES Appendix I since 1987 while the other two species currently have no CITES listing but proposed to be inserted into Appendix II for this year by a separate proposal. Some studies on the species led by F. Andreone demonstrate that this species is frequently found outside of protected area and one of the strategies to conservation purpose is the trade. The species is listed as Near Threatened on the IUCN Red List.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop13 Analyses Cover 29 Jul 04.Qxd
    IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices at the 13th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Bangkok, Thailand 2-14 October 2004 Prepared by IUCN Species Survival Commission and TRAFFIC Production of the 2004 IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices was made possible through the support of: The Commission of the European Union Canadian Wildlife Service Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Department for Nature, the Netherlands Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany Federal Veterinary Office, Switzerland Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Dirección General para la Biodiversidad (Spain) Ministère de l'écologie et du développement durable, Direction de la nature et des paysages (France) IUCN-The World Conservation Union IUCN-The World Conservation Union brings together states, government agencies and a diverse range of non-governmental organizations in a unique global partnership - over 1 000 members in some 140 countries. As a Union, IUCN seeks to influence, encourage and assist societies throughout the world to conserve the integrity and diversity of nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable. IUCN builds on the strengths of its members, networks and partners to enhance their capacity and to support global alliances to safeguard natural resources at local, regional and global levels. The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions. With 8 000 scientists, field researchers, government officials and conservation leaders, the SSC membership is an unmatched source of information about biodiversity conservation. SSC members provide technical and scientific advice to conservation activities throughout the world and to governments, international conventions and conservation organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to CITES Species Listings
    NOTICE TO THE WILDLIFE IMPORT/EXPORT COMMUNITY December 21, 2016 Subject: Changes to CITES Species Listings Background: Party countries of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) meet approximately every two years for a Conference of the Parties. During these meetings, countries review and vote on amendments to the listings of protected species in CITES Appendix I and Appendix II. Such amendments become effective 90 days after the last day of the meeting unless Party countries agree to delay implementation. The most recent Conference of the Parties (CoP 17) was held in Johannesburg, South Africa, September 24 – October 4, 2016. Action: Except as noted below, the amendments to CITES Appendices I and II that were adopted at CoP 17, will be effective on January 2, 2017. Any specimens of these species imported into, or exported from, the United States on or after January 2, 2017 will require CITES documentation as specified under the amended listings. The import, export, or re-export of shipments of these species that are accompanied by CITES documents reflecting a pre-January 2 listing status or that lack CITES documents because no listing was previously in effect must be completed by midnight (local time at the point of import/export) on January 1, 2017. Importers and exporters can find the official revised CITES appendices on the CITES website. Species Added to Appendix I . Abronia anzuetoi (Alligator lizard) . Abronia campbelli (Alligator lizard) . Abronia fimbriata (Alligator lizard) . Abronia frosti (Alligator lizard) . Abronia meledona (Alligator lizard) . Cnemaspis psychedelica (Psychedelic rock gecko) . Lygodactylus williamsi (Turquoise dwarf gecko) . Telmatobius coleus (Titicaca water frog) .
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the East Africa Natural History Society and National Museum
    JOURNAL OF THE EAST AFRICA NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY AND NATIONAL MUSEUM 15 October, 1978 Vol. 31 No. 167 A CHECKLIST OF mE SNAKES OF KENYA Stephen Spawls 35 WQodland Rise, Muswell Hill, London NIO, England ABSTRACT Loveridge (1957) lists 161 species and subspecies of snake from East Mrica. Eighty-nine of these belonging to some 41 genera were recorded from Kenya. The new list contains some 106 forms of 46 genera. - Three full species have been deleted from Loveridge's original checklist. Typhlops b. blanfordii has been synonymised with Typhlops I. lineolatus, Typhlops kaimosae has been synonymised with Typhlops angolensis (Roux-Esteve 1974) and Co/uber citeroii has been synonymised with Meizodon semiornatus (Lanza 1963). Of the 20 forms added to the list, 12 are forms collected for the first time in Kenya but occurring outside its political boundaries and one, Atheris desaixi is a new species, the holotype and paratypes being collected within Kenya. There has also been a large number of changes amongst the 89 original species as a result of revisionary systematic studies. This accounts for the other additions to the list. INTRODUCTION The most recent checklist dealing with the snakes of Kenya is Loveridge (1957). Since that date there has been a significant number of developments in the Kenyan herpetological field. This paper intends to update the nomenclature in the part of the checklist that concerns the snakes of Kenya and to extend the list to include all the species now known to occur within the political boundaries of Kenya. It also provides the range of each species within Kenya with specific locality records .
    [Show full text]
  • Analyses UICN/TRAFFIC Des Propositions D'amendement Aux Annexes De La CITES, 2016,Ont Pu Être Préparées Grâce À L'appui Des Organismes Suivants
    S Analyses E UICN/TRAFFIC des propositions d’amendement aux S Annexes de la CITES pour la 17e session de la Conférence des Parties Johannesburg, Afrique du Sud 24 Septembre–5 Octobre 2016 L Y Préparées par le programme d’espèces de l’UICN et la Commission UICN de la sauvegarde des espèces et TRAFFIC A N A Analyses UICN/TRAFFIC des propositions d’amendement aux Annexes de la CITES pour la 17e session de la Conférence des Parties Johannesburg, Afrique du Sud 24 Septembre–5 Octobre 2016 Préparées par le programme d’espèces de l’UICN et la Commission UICN de la sauvegarde des espèces et TRAFFIC With the financial support of the EU Austria, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Ministry of the Environment of Finland Ministry of External Affairs and Cooperation Germany, Federal Ministry for the France, Ministry of Environment, Environment, Nature Conservation and Energy and the Sea Nuclear Safety Netherlands, CITES Management Authority, Ministry of Economic Affairs España - Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad New Zealand, Department of Conservation Naturvårdsverket – Swedish Environmental Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office FSVO, Protection Agency, Scientific Authority of CITES Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA United States, U.S Fish & Wildlife Service Les Analyses UICN/TRAFFIC des propositions d'amendement aux annexes de la CITES, 2016,ont pu être préparées grâce à l'appui des organismes suivants : Allemagne – Ministère fédéral de l’environnement, de la conservation de la nature et de
    [Show full text]
  • Trade in Live Reptiles, Its Impact on Wild Populations, and the Role of the European Market
    BIOC-06813; No of Pages 17 Biological Conservation xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bioc Review Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market Mark Auliya a,⁎,SandraAltherrb, Daniel Ariano-Sanchez c, Ernst H. Baard d,CarlBrownd,RafeM.Browne, Juan-Carlos Cantu f,GabrieleGentileg, Paul Gildenhuys d, Evert Henningheim h, Jürgen Hintzmann i, Kahoru Kanari j, Milivoje Krvavac k, Marieke Lettink l, Jörg Lippert m, Luca Luiselli n,o, Göran Nilson p, Truong Quang Nguyen q, Vincent Nijman r, James F. Parham s, Stesha A. Pasachnik t,MiguelPedronou, Anna Rauhaus v,DannyRuedaCórdovaw, Maria-Elena Sanchez x,UlrichScheppy, Mona van Schingen z,v, Norbert Schneeweiss aa, Gabriel H. Segniagbeto ab, Ruchira Somaweera ac, Emerson Y. Sy ad,OguzTürkozanae, Sabine Vinke af, Thomas Vinke af,RajuVyasag, Stuart Williamson ah,1,ThomasZieglerai,aj a Department Conservation Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Conservation (UFZ), Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany b Pro Wildlife, Kidlerstrasse 2, 81371 Munich, Germany c Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle de, Guatemala d Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, South Africa e Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA f Bosques de Cerezos 112, C.P. 11700 México D.F., Mexico g Dipartimento di Biologia, Universitá Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy h Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusion in Appendix II, Bush Viper
    Original language: English and French CoP17 Prop. XX CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September - 5 October 2016 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Inclusion of the Mt. Kenya Bush Viper Atheris desaixi in Appendix II in accordance with Article II, paragraph 2 (a), of the Convention and Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP16), Annex 2 a. B. Proponent Kenya C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1. Class: Reptilia 1.2. Order: Squamata 1.3. Family: Viperidae 1.4. Genus and species: Atheris desaixi (Ashe, 1968) 1.5. Scientific synonyms: None 1.6. Common names: English Mt. Kenya Bush Viper, Ashe’s Viper 1.7. Code number: Not applicable 2. Overview This proposal seeks to list Mt Kenya bush viper in CITES Appendix to help regulate trade and enhance enforcement for its conservation. Mt. Kenya Bush viper is endemic to Kenya and has a restricted range in mid-attitude forests in central Kenya. The species is reported to be in decline in its known sites to the extent of depletion as a result of habitat degradation and illegal collection. Natural densities are very low and census is very difficult to carry out. No meaningful monitoring of trade is possible without a CITES listing and no records exist as all the trade is illegal. There is evidence of international live trade to meet demands for zoos and private collections mainly in CoP17 Prop. XX – p. 1 Europe and USA.
    [Show full text]