DOCSLIB.ORG

Or “Life” Comes From

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Or “Life” Comes From BiogenesisBiogenesis OrOr ““LifeLife ”” ComesComes fromfrom ““LifeLife ”” DarwinianDarwinian EvolutionEvolution isis BasedBased onon SpontaneousSpontaneous GenerationGeneration oror ““AbiogenesisAbiogenesis ”” It was once thought that…………… DecayingDecaying MeatMeat GarbageGarbage “Abiogenesis ” the process of living material (‘life’) originating from non-living material (‘non-life’) TheThe IdeaIdea ofof SpontaneousSpontaneous GenerationGeneration isis NotNot ‘‘NewNew ’’ ItIt ’’ss atat LeastLeast 25002500 YearsYears Old!Old! The ancient philosopher Anaximander of Miletus ( 550 BC ) taught that life first generated by materialistic processes from sea slime. However, this idea failed to explain the issue of organic design: Why does the universe appear to be ordered and designed to function so well together? Origin of the Laws of Mathematics/Physics? Empedocles (450 BC ) was one of the first to appreciate this problem when he realized that the phenomenon of adaptive complexity required a specific naturalistic explanation. Empedocles proposed that the fantastic shapes of organic and inorganic objects was the result of the continual, random flux of matter. Everything that exists was generated by the purely chance interaction of all possible combination of elements, with those combinations that were ‘stable’ surviving. (….. But why is this not going on today? ) NaturalisticNaturalistic ExplanationsExplanations ofof OriginsOrigins MustMust BeginBegin withwith ““SpontaneousSpontaneous GenerationGeneration ”” “The universe began with a ‘big bang’ 15 billion years ago. The stars formed 10 billion years ago, the sun formed 5 billion years ago and the molten earth came into existence about 4.5 billion years ago”. “Water formed on the earth some 3.8 billion years ago and over hundreds of millions of years life formed from non-life through the processes of Natural Selection and Mutation ; then evolved into fish, then amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, then ape-like creatures and then man—a process involving chemical & biological innovation, death and extinction.” SpontaneousSpontaneous GenerationGeneration oror AbiogenesisAbiogenesis WasWas DisprovenDisproven BeforeBefore DarwinDarwin PublishedPublished OriginOrigin ofof SpeciesSpecies The theory of abiogenesis or more commonly, spontaneous generation , was challenged by scientific experiments, such as those performed by the Italian biologist Francesco Redi in 1668 . Redi demonstrated that maggots (the young of flies) did not appear in meat from which adult flies were excluded. Previously, many scientists had believed that flies developed from decaying meat. Up until the late 1700’s some scientists still believed that mice were generated in piles of rotting garbage. But Darwinian Evolution is based on Spontaneous Generation! FrancescoFrancesco RediRedi ’’ss ExperimentsExperiments The theory of spontaneous generation was disproven by a series of scientific experiments performed by the Italian biologist and founder of ex perimental biology, Francesco Redi, and published in 1668 as Experiments on the Generation of Insects ; which is regarded as a milestone in the history of modern scienc e. In one experiment he put raw meat into three jars; one jar rema ined uncovered, one was covered with gauze & the third was sealed with a cork. Redi demonstrated that maggots (the larval stage of flies) did not appear in meat from which adult flies were excluded. Maggots only appeared on surfa ces accessible to flies such as the opened jar and the gauze on top of the jar. Also, when dead flies or maggots were put in sealed jars with de ad animals or veal, no maggots appeared, but when the same thing was done with living f lies, maggots did. He continued his experiments by capturing the maggots and obser ving them metamorphosizing into flies demonstrating their complete life -cycle. Although these experiments seem simplistic and self-evident compared to modern science, they were considered remarkable at the time. PerhapsBut, surprisingly, even more even surprising up until is thethat late prominent 1700 ’s some scientists scientists today still think that life arosebelieved spontaneously that mice were from generated a “primordial in piles soup of” rottiunderng thegarbage! “right ” conditions! LouisLouis PasteurPasteur ’’ss ExperimentsExperiments The theory of spontaneous generation was largely abandoned in the mid-1800's. By then, improvements in microscopes and other scientific instruments had enabled scientists to see the eggs and sperm of higher animals, the ovules (eggs) and pollen of plants, and bacteria and other microorganisms. For example, in the mid-1800's, the French scientist Louis Pasteur observed reproduction and growth in microorganisms. He demonstrated that the microorganisms would grow in sterilized broth only if the broth was first exposed to air that contained their spores (reproductive cells). Pasteur's discoveries led to the development of the cell theory of the origin of living matter. The cell theory is based on all life originating from pre-existing living material. This is also known as the “law of biogenesis ”. Living material always comes from living material. BiogenesisBiogenesis andand ““RecapitulationRecapitulation ’’ The term ‘biogenesis ’ has also been used in reference to the biogenetic (or recapitulation ) theory. This theory, which was popular during the late 1800's, stated that “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny ”. This statement means that during its ontogeny ; that is, during its development in the embryonic stage each organism recapitulates (repeats) various stages in its species' phylogeny (evolutionary history). Scientists disproved this theory in the early 1900's. Recapitulation is classically depicted in Ernst Haeckel’s [faked] drawings. He was a German zoologist who lived from 1834 to 1919. Ernst Haeckel’s Fake Drawings ( top row ) ‘‘RecapitulationRecapitulation ’’ ErnstErnst HaeckelHaeckel ’’ss LegacyLegacy What the modern textbooks and encyclopedias fail to mention is that the original drawings of embryonic stages, by a German zoologist named Ernst Haeckel [1834-1919] , that supposedly shows that each animal during its growth as an embryo, repeats the changes its ancestors underwent, were found to be faked. Yet these pictures still appear in many modern biology textbooks to support the discredited theory of abiogenesis or spontaneous generation of living material. Thus, this false idea of spontaneous generation (abiogenesis ) is carried over into modern times. Note the following quotes from the Grolier’s and World Book encyclopedias…………... ……..Although..Although Discredited,Discredited, SpontaneousSpontaneous GenerationGeneration ,, oror ‘‘AbiogenesisAbiogenesis ’’ IsIs StillStill BeingBeing TaughtTaught asas Fact!Fact! “Although it is now known that all present life on Earth is the result of the reproduction of pre-existing life, many scientists accept a modified theory * of spontaneous generation to explain the origin of life itself. The theory holds that billions of years ago LIFE originated in the oceans as the result of spontaneous aggregations of dissolved organic molecules, which in turn arose from inorganic chemical reactions energized by ultraviolet light, electrical discharges, and heat.” Grolier’s Encyclopedia (1998) *The only thing that’s ‘modified’ is the hypothesis (although disproven) that Abiogenesis occurred at least once! TheThe ImpossibilityImpossibility ofof AbiogenesisAbiogenesis isis ExplainedExplained AwayAway AsAs aa ““OneOne --TimeTime EventEvent ”” “Today, most scientists believe that spontaneous generation took place at least once when certain chemicals came together to form the first simple living organism more than three billion years ago. This process is not thought to be occurring in nature today, since conditions on the earth no longer favor such chemical combinations. In addition, any simple organisms that did form in this way would almost certainly fail to compete successfully against more complex existing organisms. However, laboratory experiments since the mid-1900's have showed that many molecules found in living organisms can be synthesized (produced artificially). Most biologists believe that it will eventually be possible to produce simple forms of life in the laboratory*.” World Book Encyclopedia (1998) *Wrong! Please refer to the Creation Topic “Biogenesis” ButBut NoNo EvidenceEvidence ofof AbiogenesisAbiogenesis ‘‘OneOne --TimeTime EventEvent ’’ “Rocks of great antiquity have been examined over the past two decades and in none of them has any trace of abiotically produced organic compounds been found ….. So ancient are these rocks that they must have been lain down not long after the formation of the oceans themselves …….Considering the way the pre -biotic soup is referred to in so many discussions of the origin of life as an already established reality, it comes as something of a shock to realize that there is absolutely no positive evidence for its existence .” Michael Denton, Ph.D., Microbiologist, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis , (Adler & Adler, 1986), p. 261. Theory of Darwinian Evolution Violates the “Law of Biogenesis” • Life Is ALWAYS Observed As Coming From Pre -existing Life. This Is True Even in “Cloning ”. • Reversibility of Chemical Reactions in Water Works Against Spontaneous Generation of “Life ”. • Spontaneous Generation or Abiogenesis Has Never Been Observed or Successfully Demonstrated Under Laboratory Conditions. [e.g., next series of slides ] • Many scientists have tried to re -create “life
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Frog in Taffeta Pants
    Evolutionary Anthropology 13:5–10 (2004) CROTCHETS & QUIDDITIES The Frog in Taffeta Pants KENNETH WEISS What is the magic that makes dead flesh fly? himself gave up on the preformation view). These various intuitions arise natu- Where does a new life come from? manded explanation. There was no rally, if sometimes fancifully. The nat- Before there were microscopes, and compelling reason to think that what uralist Henry Bates observed that the before the cell theory, this was not a one needed to find was too small to natives in the village of Aveyros, up trivial question. Centuries of answers see. Aristotle hypothesized epigenesis, the Tapajos tributary to the Amazon, were pure guesswork by today’s stan- a kind of spontaneous generation of believed the fire ants, that plagued dards, but they had deep implications life from the required materials (pro- them horribly, sprang up from the for the understanding of life. The vided in the egg), that systematic ob- blood of slaughtered victims of the re- 5 phrase spontaneous generation has servation suggested coalesced into a bellion of 1835–1836 in Brazil. In gone out of our vocabulary except as chick. Such notions persisted for cen- fact, Greek mythology is full of beings an historical relic, reflecting a total turies into what we will see was the spontaneously arising—snakes from success of two centuries of biological critical 17th century, when the follow- Medusa’s blood, Aphrodite from sea- research.1 The realization that a new ing alchemist’s recipe was offered for foam, and others. Even when the organism is always generated from the production of mice:3,4 mix sweaty truth is known, we can be similarly one or more cells shed by parents ex- underwear and wheat husks; store in impressed with the phenomena of plained how something could arise open-mouthed jar for 21 days; the generation.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Scope of Microbiology the Story of Invisible Organisms
    A study material for M.Sc. Biochemistry (Semester: IV) Students on the topic (EC-1; Unit I) History and Scope of Microbiology The story of invisible organisms Dr. Reena Mohanka Professor & Head Department of Biochemistry Patna University Mob. No.:- +91-9334088879 E. Mail: [email protected] MICROBIOLOGY 1. WHAT IS A MICROBIOLOGY? Micro means very small and biology is the study of living things, so microbiology is the study of very small living things normally too small that are usually unable to be viewed with the naked eye. Need a microscope to see them Virus - 10 →1000 nanometers Bacteria - 0.1 → 5 micrometers (Human eye ) can see 0.1 mm to 1 mm Microbiology has become an umbrella term that encompasses many sub disciplines or fields of study. These include: - Bacteriology: The study of bacteria - Mycology: Fungi - Protozoology: Protozoa - Phycology: Algae - Parasitology: Parasites - Virology: Viruses WHAT IS THE NEED TO STUDY MICROBIOLOGY • Genetic engineering • Recycling sewage • Bioremediation: use microbes to remove toxins (oil spills) • Use of microbes to control crop pests • Maintain balance of environment (microbial ecology) • Basis of food chain • Nitrogen fixation • Manufacture of food and drink • Photosynthesis: Microbes are involved in photosynthesis and accounts for >50% of earth’s oxygen History of Microbiology Anton van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) (Dutch Scientist) • The credit of discovery of microbial world goes to Anton van Leeuwenhoek. He made careful observations of microscopic organisms, which he called animalcules (1670s). • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek described live microorganisms that he observed in teeth scrapings and rain water. • Major contributions to the development of microbiology was the invention of the microscope (50-300X magnification) by Anton von Leuwenhoek and the implementation of the scientific method.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Scientific Inquiry-S
    Scientific Inquiry What do scientists do? Why? Science is a unique way of learning about the natural world. Scientists work hard to explain events, living organisms, and changes we see around us every day. Model 1 depicts typical activities or stages scientists engage in when conducting their work. The design of the model shows how various steps in scientific inquiry are connected to one another. None of the activities stands alone—they are all interdependent. Model 1 – Scientific Inquiry Observe Communicate Define the with the wider problem community Form a Reflect study on the question findings Questions Research Analyze the problem the results State the Experiment expectations and gather (hypothesis) data Scientific Inquiry 1 1. What is the central theme of all scientific inquiry as shown in Model 1? 2. What are the nine activities that scientists engage in as part of scientific inquiry? 3. Which of the activities would require a scientist to make some observations? 4. Which of the steps would require a scientist to gather data? 5. Considering the activity described as “communicating with the wider community,” in what ways might a scientist communicate? 6. Remembering that scientists often work in teams, which activities would require a scientist to communicate with others? 7. Given your responses to Questions 1–6, do you think these activities must be carried out in a specific order or can multiple activities be carried out at the same time? Justify your response by giving examples to support your answer. 2 POGIL™ Activities for High School Biology Model 2 – Redi’s Experiment Meat Fly eggs and maggots Fly Solid cover Screen cover Container 1 Container 2 Container 3 The table below represents the ideas the Italian scientist Francesco Redi (1626–1698) might have had as he was carrying out his experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1–2 How Scientists Work (Pages 8–15)
    BIO_ALL IN1_StGd_tese_ch01 8/7/03 5:42 PM Page 181 Name______________________________ Class __________________ Date ______________ Section 1–2 How Scientists Work (pages 8–15) This section explains how scientists test hypotheses. It also describes how a scientific theory develops. Designing an Experiment (pages 8–10) 1. The idea that life can arise from nonliving matter is called spontaneous generation . 2. What was Francesco Redi’s hypothesis about the appearance of maggots? Flies produce maggots. 3. What are variables in an experiment? They are factors that can change. 4. Ideally, how many variables should an experiment test at a time? It should test only one variable at a time. 5. When a variable is kept unchanged in an experiment, it is said to be controlled . 6. What is a controlled experiment? A controlled experiment is an experiment in which one variable is changed while the other variables are controlled. 7. The illustration below shows the beginning of Redi’s experiment. Complete the illustration by showing the outcome. Redi’s Experiment on Spontaneous Generation Uncovered jars Covered jars Several days pass. © Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Maggots appear No maggots appear BIO_ALL IN1_StGd_tese_ch01 8/7/03 5:42 PM Page 182 Name______________________________ Class __________________ Date ______________ 8. Complete the table about variables. VARIABLES Type of Variable Definition Manipulated variable The variable that is deliberately changed in an experiment Responding variable The variable that is observed and changes in response to the manipulated variable 9. In Redi’s experiment, what were the manipulated variable and the responding variable? The manipulated variable was the presence or absence of the gauze covering, and the responding variable was whether maggots appear.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Generation & Origin of Life Concepts from Antiquity to The
    SIMB News News magazine of the Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology April/May/June 2019 V.69 N.2 • www.simbhq.org Spontaneous Generation & Origin of Life Concepts from Antiquity to the Present :ŽƵƌŶĂůŽĨ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂůDŝĐƌŽďŝŽůŽŐLJΘŝŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJ Impact Factor 3.103 The Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology is an international journal which publishes papers in metabolic engineering & synthetic biology; biocatalysis; fermentation & cell culture; natural products discovery & biosynthesis; bioenergy/biofuels/biochemicals; environmental microbiology; biotechnology methods; applied genomics & systems biotechnology; and food biotechnology & probiotics Editor-in-Chief Ramon Gonzalez, University of South Florida, Tampa FL, USA Editors Special Issue ^LJŶƚŚĞƚŝĐŝŽůŽŐLJ; July 2018 S. Bagley, Michigan Tech, Houghton, MI, USA R. H. Baltz, CognoGen Biotech. Consult., Sarasota, FL, USA Impact Factor 3.500 T. W. Jeffries, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 3.000 T. D. Leathers, USDA ARS, Peoria, IL, USA 2.500 M. J. López López, University of Almeria, Almeria, Spain C. D. Maranas, Pennsylvania State Univ., Univ. Park, PA, USA 2.000 2.505 2.439 2.745 2.810 3.103 S. Park, UNIST, Ulsan, Korea 1.500 J. L. Revuelta, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain 1.000 B. Shen, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA 500 D. K. Solaiman, USDA ARS, Wyndmoor, PA, USA Y. Tang, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA E. J. Vandamme, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium H. Zhao, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA 10 Most Cited Articles Published in 2016 (Data from Web of Science: October 15, 2018) Senior Author(s) Title Citations L. Katz, R. Baltz Natural product discovery: past, present, and future 103 Genetic manipulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis for improved production in Streptomyces and R.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Microbiology: Spontaneous Generation Theory
    HISTORY OF MICROBIOLOGY: SPONTANEOUS GENERATION THEORY Microbiology often has been defined as the study of organisms and agents too small to be seen clearly by the unaided eye—that is, the study of microorganisms. Because objects less than about one millimeter in diameter cannot be seen clearly and must be examined with a microscope, microbiology is concerned primarily with organisms and agents this small and smaller. Microbial World Microorganisms are everywhere. Almost every natural surface is colonized by microbes (including our skin). Some microorganisms can live quite happily in boiling hot springs, whereas others form complex microbial communities in frozen sea ice. Most microorganisms are harmless to humans. You swallow millions of microbes every day with no ill effects. In fact, we are dependent on microbes to help us digest our food and to protect our bodies from pathogens. Microbes also keep the biosphere running by carrying out essential functions such as decomposition of dead animals and plants. Microbes are the dominant form of life on planet Earth. More than half the biomass on Earth consists of microorganisms, whereas animals constitute only 15% of the mass of living organisms on Earth. This Microbiology course deals with • How and where they live • Their structure • How they derive food and energy • Functions of soil micro flora • Role in nutrient transformation • Relation with plant • Importance in Industries The microorganisms can be divided into two distinct groups based on the nucleus structure: Prokaryotes – The organism lacking true nucleus (membrane enclosed chromosome and nucleolus) and other organelles like mitochondria, golgi body, entoplasmic reticulum etc. are referred as Prokaryotes.
    [Show full text]
  • Annals of Medical History
    ANNALS OF MEDICAL HISTORY CONTENTS: VOLUME VIII ORIGINAL ARTICLES PAGE Poetry and Physic..........................................................................Sir Humphry Rolleston ... i Gleanings from Old Chinese Medicine ...... Bernard E. Read................................ 16 Some Humble Workers in the Cause of Anatomy a Hundred Years Ago................................................................................W. B. Howell...............................20 Pirate and Buccaneer Doctors.................................................Leo Eloesser...............................31 Galen..................................................................................................Archibald Mallocb .... 61 Studies in Paleopathology xiv (Second Series, i) Roy L. Moodie................................. 69 Studies in Paleopathology xv (Second Series, 11) . Roy L.Moodie ..................................73 Studies in Paleopathology xvi (Second Series, hi) . Roy L.Moodie ................................. 78 The Life and Time of Adolf Kussmaul.Theodore H. Bast..................................................................95 Medical Numismatics................................................................... Fielding H. Garrison . 128 Samuel D. Gross................................................................................John H. Gibbon.......................136 Pioneer Medicine in Western Pennsylvania (Parts i-ii) . Theodore Diller............................141, 292 Concerning Some Old Medical Journals ../... W. B. Howell...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Slides
    Jutta Schickore (Bloomington) “Methods Discourse” Methods-related statements and criteria that past experimenters themselves proposed. E.g.: An experimental finding should be reproducible I use present-day concepts and distinctions (e.g. “replication”) but I also pay attention to past actors’ terms (e.g. “imitation”) I pay particular attention to the ways in which and where past scientists discuss methodological issues and whether they offer justifications for methodological views. Snake venom research, ca. 1660-1860 Research questions: Nature and composition of venom? Effects on the (human) body? Antidotes? Research techniques: Animal experimentation, post mortem dissection Chemical investigations of venom Sample episodes The Tuscan naturalist Francesco Redi (1626-97) and his critic, the French apothecary and chemist Moyse Charas (1619-98) The Tuscan naturalist and physician Felice Fontana (1730-1805) Their views on comparative trials, repetition, replication (“imitation”), and variation (“diversification”) Francesco Redi (1626-97) The “yellow liquor” causes the fatal consequences of snake bites Deadly when inserted into wounds, innocent when taken by mouth Redi’s critic Charas: the viper’s rage is deadly Redi the experimentalist Redi demanded that experimenters see for themselves, and he stated that he could not trust the phenomena “if they are not confirmed by iterated and reiterated experience.” Let’s look beyond his general commitment to experimentalism and examine what exactly this commitment involved. Many, many experiments Old fables were refuted “by experiments made many many times.” Redi had “observed [. .] very often” that the yellow liquor spurted into the wound when the viper struck. The effects of bile and of the yellow fluid were tested on a number of different animals (as well as on the viper catcher).
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones to Modern Science
    Milestones to Modern Science 1543 Andreas Vesalius publishes unprecedented observations about the human body in De Fabrica. 1546 Girolamo Fracastoro proposes the idea that diseases can spread like seeds. 1599 Ulisse Aldrovandi publishes the first textbook of zoology. 1628 William Harvey publishes his work describing the blood's circulation and the heart's structure. 1650 Antony van Leeuwenhoek creates a microscope ten times more powerful than previous models. 1663 Robert Hooke discovers cells in a section of cork using a microscope. 1668 Francesco Redi disproves theories of spontaneous generation. 1674 Van Leeuwenhoek discovers bacteria using his microscope. 1701 Giacomo Pylarini gives the first smallpox inoculations to children in Constantinople. 1728 Pierre Fauchard describes how to fill teeth using tin, lead, and gold. Astronomy 1543 Nicolaus Copernicus publishes De Revolutionibus, laying out his heliocentric theory. 1572 Tycho Brahe observes a supernova in the constellation Cassiopeia. 1596 Johannes Kepler writes the first public defense of the Copernican system. 1608 Hans Lippershey and Zacharias Janssen patent original versions of the telescope. 1609 Kepler publishes his first two laws of planetary motion. 1630 Galileo finishes his Dialogue and obtains permission for its printing from the Vatican. 1688 Isaac Newton builds his first reflecting telescope. Physics and Chemistry 1591 Galileo demonstrates that the rate of a falling object does not depend on its weight. 1600 William Gilbert suggests the Earth behaves like a giant magnet with poles on opposite ends. 1649 Pierre Gassendi revives the idea that matter is made up of atoms. 1650 Otto von Guericke's air pump creates a vacuum between two hemispheres that even teams of horses can't pull apart.
    [Show full text]
  • “Their Wonderful Mechanism” Looking at Bugs in the Age of Enlightenment
    “Their Wonderful Mechanism” Looking at Bugs in the Age of Enlightenment an exhibition by troy sherman But as mankind became more enlightened, the great wonders of nature in these small animals began to be observed . carolus linnaeus, Fundamenta Entomologiae, 1772 Cover art from robert hooke, Micrographia, 1665 “Their Wonderful Mechanism” Looking at Bugs in the Age of Enlightenment HEN ROBERT HOOKE peered Williams College and organized in three through his microscope into the sections corresponding to the body segments of Weyes of a dronefly, he didn’t simply catch an insect, demonstrates how scientific discourse the bug peering back: concerning bugs he saw his world converged with and reflected in its gaze. helped shape empirical Within each pane of methodologies and the insect’s compound technologies, colonial eyes, wrote Hooke in expansion, and 1666, “I have been able political thought to discover a Land- during western scape of those things Europe’s age of which lay before my Enlightenment. window.” In Hooke’s Hooke’s observa- study, the dronefly’s tion dramatizes the play eyes not only served as between knowledge and experimental material culture at an important to demonstrate the stage in the history of observational capacity entomology: in the 17th of his microscope, and 18th centuries, as but also provided a robert hooke, Micrographia, 1665 European natural philosophers visually captivating turned unprecedented amounts of their metaphor for the new technology. Hooke’s attention towards insect life, bugs in turn experiment indexes a shift of empirical contributed to shaping the new ways that interest towards the study of bugs rooted in these scientists were describing their world.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek B. Edward Jenner C. Francesco Redi
    Exam 1, Micr-22, C. Briggs, ver 9.14 (scaled to 100pts) Name: ___________________________ Tip: Answer the questions you know first. At least guess on everything before you turn this in. Words, drawings, charts – all are welcome. 1. Please write a properly-formatted species name. 1pt 2. Please match the following individuals to their major microbiological contribution. 6pts ____ Challenged idea of spontaneous generation by showing that maggots A. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek B. Edward Jenner from fly eggs. C. Francesco Redi ____ Helped popularize smallpox variolation. D. Lazzaro Spallanzani E. Louis Pasteur ____ Improved microscopes, one of first to observe microorganisms. F. Robert Koch ____ Challenged idea of spontaneous generation by showing that boiled and G. Lady Mary Wortley Montague long-necked containers did not grow microbes. ____ Challenged idea of spontaneous generation by showing that boiled and sealed containers did not grow microbes. ____ Helped develop the smallpox vaccine. ____ Developed rules to determine the causes of particular infectious diseases. 3. Name two emerging diseases. 2pts 4. What are two reasons that diseases are still emerging? 2pts 5. Please identify a major benefit and a major drawback / cost of using the following types of microscope or stain. 4pts Benefit Drawback / Cost (a) Fluorescence (b) Gram stain (c) Brightfield (d) Scanning electron 6. What is a difference between a simple stain and a differential stain? 1pt 7. For the following structures, please indicate whether this can be found in a prokaryotic cell (“pro”), in a eukaryotic cell (“euk”), or in both (“both”). 5pts _____ DNA _____ Rotating flagella _____ Rough endoplasmic reticulum _____ RNA _____ Enzymes _____ Plasma membrane _____ Ribosomes _____ Peptidoglycan _____ Cell wall _____ Nucleus 8.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Microbiology?
    Introduction to Microbiology Brief History of Microbiology 1st Course Lec.#1 06. Dec. 2020 Dr. Kawakib I. Al-Zubaidy 1 What is Microbiology? Microbiology is the science that deals with the study of biological organisms that are too small to be seen with the naked eye (without using microscope).in order to not only determine how they live in their environment, but also how they impact their respective surroundings and thus other organisms around them (human beings, animals, etc). Microorganisms or microbes- these microscopic organisms Commonly called “germs”. Bacteria, Archaea, Fungi, Protozoans, Algae, Viruses Some organisms are large though – Helminths – worms Multicellular animal parasites – Helminths * Not all cause disease and many more are useful or essential for human life 2 3 4 Bacteria Fungi Protozoans Giardia Ameba 5 Viruses Bacteriophage Avian Flu Helminth ; Tapeworm 6 Why Do We Study Microorganisms? We study microbiology because bacteria, viruses and fungi are the leading cause of death in the history of mankind. Some Microorganisms Benefit Man: Many microorganisms are involved in the production of food or are directly edible. The presence of bacteria (normal flora) in our bodies inhibits the growth of potentially pathogenic bacteria helping to keep us healthy. Modern biotechnology is often associated with the use of genetically altered microorganisms such as E. coli or yeast for the production of substances like synthetic insulin or antibiotics. 7 Why Do We Study Microorganisms? Biotechnological advances in agriculture also require the help of microorganisms to form Transgenic Plant with increased yield, reduced vulnerability to environmental and pathogenic stresses, and improved taste. Microbes are involved in cycling vital elements such as carbon and nitrogen.
    [Show full text]