Verzeichnis Der Briefe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Verzeichnis Der Briefe VERZEICHNIS DER BRIEFE 1. Friedrich Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, 1. Januar 1806 .........21 2. Helmina von Chézy an Dorothea Schlegel, [zwischen 1. Januar und 21. März 1806] .....................................................24 3. Friedrich Schlegel an Ludwig Achim von Arnim, 3. Januar 1806 ........25 4. Friedrich Schlegel an Georg Andreas Reimer, 4. Januar 1806 ...........27 *5. Friedrich Schlegel an Johanna Christiane Erdmuthe und Johann Karl Fürchte- gott Schlegel, 6. Januar 1806 ...................................29 *6. Anne Louise Germaine de Staël an Friedrich Schlegel, [Mitte Januar 1806] . 29 *7. Friedrich Schlegel an Friedrich Leopold zu Stolberg, [etwa 21. Januar 1806] . 29 *8. Georg Andreas Reimer an Friedrich Schlegel, 28. Januar 1806 ..........29 *9. Caroline Paulus an Dorothea Schlegel, [Ende Januar 1806] ............30 10. Friedrich Schlegel an Anne Louise Germaine de Staël, [Ende Januar 1806] . 30 11. Friedrich Leopold zu Stolberg an Friedrich Schlegel, 29. Januar 1806.....32 *12. Georg Andreas Reimer an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 10. Februar 1806]....32 *13. Karl von Hardenberg an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 17. Februar 1806] .....33 14. Ludwig Achim von Arnim an Friedrich Schlegel, [zwischen 17. und 25. Februar 1806] .....................................................34 *15. Charlotte Ernst an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 20. Februar 1806] .........34 16. Friedrich Schlegel an Georg Andreas Reimer, 24. Februar [1806] ........35 17. Dorothea Schlegel an Caroline Paulus, mit einer Nachschrift von Friedrich Schlegel, 23. und 26. Februar [180]6 .............................38 18. Friedrich Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, 27. Februar 1806 .......45 *19. August Wilhelm Schlegel an Friedrich Schlegel, 12. März 1806 .........48 *20. Georg Andreas Reimer an Friedrich Schlegel, 27. März 1806 ...........49 21. Friedrich Schlegel an Georg Andreas Reimer, 29. März 1806 ...........50 22. Friedrich Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, 15. April 1806 .........52 *23. August Wilhelm Schlegel an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 22. April 1806] .... 58 *24. Friedrich Schlegel an Karl August Varnhagen von Ense, [Anfang Mai 1806]. 58 25. Friedrich Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, 2. Mai 1806 ...........58 26. Friedrich Schlegel an Antoine-Léonard de Chézy, 2. Mai 1806..........60 27. Friedrich Schlegel an Helmina von Chézy, 11. Mai 1806 ..............61 *28. Friedrich Schlegel an August von Sachsen-Gotha-Altenburg [Ende Mai/ Anfang Juni 1806] ........................................... 62 *29. Anne Louise Germaine de Staël an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 12. Juni 1806] 62 8 Verzeichnis der Briefe 30. Friedrich Schlegel an Georg Andreas Reimer, 18. Juni [1806]...........63 31. Friedrich Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, 22. Juni 1806 ..........64 *32. Caroline Paulus an Dorothea Schlegel, [etwa 23. Juni 1806]............66 33. Friedrich Schlegel an Anne Louise Germaine de Staël, 23. Juni 1806 .....66 *34. Georg Andreas Reimer an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 27. Juni 1806].......68 *35. August Wilhelm Schlegel an Friedrich Schlegel, [Ende Juni 1806] .......69 36. Dorothea Schlegel an Caroline Paulus, 30. Juni [180]6................69 37. Friedrich Schlegel an Caroline Paulus, [vermutl. 30. Juni 1806] .........71 *38. Friedrich Schlegel an [Friedrich Majer], [vermutl. 30. Juni 1806] ........72 *39. Franz Karl Leopold von Seckendorf an Friedrich Schlegel, [Juli 1806] ....72 40. Carl von Raumer an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 3. Juli 1806] ............73 *41. Friedrich Schleiermacher an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 10. Juli 1806] .....74 *42. Anne Louise Germaine de Staël an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 13. Juli 1806] 75 43. Friedrich Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, 24. Juli [1806] .........75 44. Friedrich Schlegel an [Friedrich Wilmans], 25. Juli 1806 ..............78 45. Friedrich Schlegel an Friedrich Schleiermacher, 25. Juli 1806 ...........78 46. Friedrich Schlegel an Carl von Raumer, 25. Juli 1806.................81 *47. August Wilhelm Schlegel an Friedrich Schlegel, [26. Juli 1806] .........84 48. Friedrich Schlegel an Anne Louise Germaine de Staël, 26. Juli 1806......84 *49. Friedrich Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, [etwa 28. Juli 1806] .....86 50. Dorothea Schlegel an Friedrich Schlegel, 31. Juli 1806 ................86 51. Dorothea Schlegel an Philipp Veit, 31. Juli 1806 ....................88 52. Dorothea Schlegel an Friedrich Schlegel, 4. August 1806 ..............89 *53. Philipp Veit an Dorothea Schlegel, [4. oder 5. August 1806] ...........90 *54. Dorothea Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, [4. oder 5. August 1806] . 90 *55. August Wilhelm Schlegel an Dorothea Schlegel, 5. August [1806] .......90 *56. Friedrich Schlegel und Philipp Veit an Dorothea Schlegel, [5. oder 6. August 1806] .....................................................91 *57. Dorothea Schlegel an Henriette Mendelssohn, 9. August 1806..........91 *58. Dorothea Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, 11. August 1806 .......91 59. Dorothea Schlegel an Friedrich Schlegel, 11. August 1806 .............91 *60. Renner an Friedrich Schlegel und Philipp Veit, [vermutl. 11. August 1806] 92 *61. Friedrich Schlegel an Dorothea Schlegel, 14. August 1806 .............93 62. Friedrich Schlegel an August Wilhelm Schlegel, 14. und 15. August [1806]. 93 63. Dorothea Schlegel an Philipp Veit, 15. und 16. August 1806 ...........94 *64. Sulpiz Boisserée an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 19. August 1806]..........96 65. Dorothea Schlegel an Friedrich Schlegel, [zwischen 22. und 31. August 1806] 96 *66. Sulpiz Boisserée an Friedrich Schlegel, [etwa 25. August 1806]..........96 67. Friedrich Schlegel an Sulpiz Boisserée, 26. August 1806 ...............97 68. Friedrich Schlegel an Johann Franz Joseph von Nesselrode-Reichenstein, 26. August 1806 .............................................98.
Recommended publications
  • From the Philosophy of Religion to the History of Religions
    CHAPTER ONE FROM THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION TO THE HISTORY OF RELIGIONS CHOLARS of religion have devoted little attention to the con- nections between their views of religious history and the phi- Slosophy of religion. Hayden White’s comment that “there can be no ‘proper history’ which is not at the same time ‘philosophy of history’”1 can also be applied to religious history, but that is seldom considered today. On the contrary! Religious studies has taken pains to keep the philosophy of religion far away from its field. Neverthe- less, there is a great deal of evidence for the assertion that the histo- riography of religion was also in fact an implicit philosophy of reli- gion. A search for such qualifications soon yields results, coming up with metahistorical assumptions originating in the philosophy of reli- gion. These sorts of connections have been conscientiously noted by Edward E. Evans-Pritchard, Eric J. Sharpe, Jan de Vries, Jan van Baal, Brian Morris, J. Samuel Preus, and Jacques Waardenburg in their his- tories of the field. Yet, to date, no one has made a serious attempt to apply Hayden White’s comment systematically to research in the field of religious history. But there is every reason to do so. Evidence points to more than simply coincidental and peripheral connections between religious studies as a historical discipline and the philosophy of religion. Perhaps the idea of a history of religions with all its im- plications can be developed correctly only if we observe it from a broader and longer-term perspective of the philosophy of religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Monographs Collection (11 Series)
    Historical Monographs Collection (11 Series) Now available in 11 separate thematic series, ATLA Historical Monographs Collection provides researchers with over 10 million pages and 29,000 documents focused on religious thought and practice. The content dates from the 13th century through 1922, with the majority of documents originating from the 19th and early 20th centuries. Biblical Research Perspectives, 1516 - 1922 profiles how biblical studies grew with critical tools and the discovery of ancient manuscript materials. The Historical Critical Method radically transformed how people viewed scriptural texts, while manuscript discoveries like the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus transformed how scholars and lay people viewed sacred texts. Catholic Engagements with the Modern World, 1487 - 1918 profiles the teaching and practices of the Catholic Church in the modern era. The collection features a broad range of subjects, including Popes and Papacy, Mary, Modernism, Catholic Counter-Reformation, the Oxford Movement, and the Vatican I ecumenical council. Christian Preaching, Worship, and Piety, 1559 - 1919 reflects how Christians lived out their faith in the form of sermons, worship, and piety. It features over 700 texts of either individual or collected sermons from over 400 authors, including Lyman Beecher, Charles Grandison Finney, Friedrich Schleiermacher, and Francis Xavier Weninger. Global Religious Traditions, 1760 - 1922 profiles many living traditions outside of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. It addresses theology, philosophy,
    [Show full text]
  • The Postsecular Traces of Transcendence in Contemporary
    The Postsecular Traces of Transcendence in Contemporary German Literature Thomas R. Bell A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Dr. Sabine Wilke, Chair Dr. Richard Block Dr. Eric Ames Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Germanics ©Copyright 2015 Thomas R. Bell University of Washington Abstract The Postsecular Traces of Transcendence in Contemporary German Literature Thomas Richard Bell Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Sabine Wilke Germanics This dissertation focuses on texts written by four contemporary, German-speaking authors: W. G. Sebald’s Die Ringe des Saturn and Schwindel. Gefühle, Daniel Kehlmann’s Die Vermessung der Welt, Sybille Lewitscharoff’s Blumenberg, and Peter Handke’s Der Große Fall. The project explores how the texts represent forms of religion in an increasingly secular society. Religious themes, while never disappearing, have recently been reactivated in the context of the secular age. This current societal milieu of secularism, as delineated by Charles Taylor, provides the framework in which these fictional texts, when manifesting religious intuitions, offer a postsecular perspective that serves as an alternative mode of thought. The project asks how contemporary literature, as it participates in the construction of secular dialogue, generates moments of religiously coded transcendence. What textual and narrative techniques serve to convey new ways of perceiving and experiencing transcendence within the immanence felt and emphasized in the modern moment? While observing what the textual strategies do to evoke religious presence, the dissertation also looks at the type of religious discourse produced within the texts. The project begins with the assertion that a historically antecedent model of religion – namely, Friedrich Schleiermacher’s – which is never mentioned explicitly but implicitly present throughout, informs the style of religious discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Map of Knowledge And
    Humphry Davy George Grosz Patrick Galvin August Wilhelm von Hofmann Mervyn Gotsman Peter Blake Willa Cather Norman Vincent Peale Hans Holbein the Elder David Bomberg Hans Lewy Mark Ryden Juan Gris Ian Stevenson Charles Coleman (English painter) Mauritz de Haas David Drake Donald E. Westlake John Morton Blum Yehuda Amichai Stephen Smale Bernd and Hilla Becher Vitsentzos Kornaros Maxfield Parrish L. Sprague de Camp Derek Jarman Baron Carl von Rokitansky John LaFarge Richard Francis Burton Jamie Hewlett George Sterling Sergei Winogradsky Federico Halbherr Jean-Léon Gérôme William M. Bass Roy Lichtenstein Jacob Isaakszoon van Ruisdael Tony Cliff Julia Margaret Cameron Arnold Sommerfeld Adrian Willaert Olga Arsenievna Oleinik LeMoine Fitzgerald Christian Krohg Wilfred Thesiger Jean-Joseph Benjamin-Constant Eva Hesse `Abd Allah ibn `Abbas Him Mark Lai Clark Ashton Smith Clint Eastwood Therkel Mathiassen Bettie Page Frank DuMond Peter Whittle Salvador Espriu Gaetano Fichera William Cubley Jean Tinguely Amado Nervo Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Ferdinand Hodler Françoise Sagan Dave Meltzer Anton Julius Carlson Bela Cikoš Sesija John Cleese Kan Nyunt Charlotte Lamb Benjamin Silliman Howard Hendricks Jim Russell (cartoonist) Kate Chopin Gary Becker Harvey Kurtzman Michel Tapié John C. Maxwell Stan Pitt Henry Lawson Gustave Boulanger Wayne Shorter Irshad Kamil Joseph Greenberg Dungeons & Dragons Serbian epic poetry Adrian Ludwig Richter Eliseu Visconti Albert Maignan Syed Nazeer Husain Hakushu Kitahara Lim Cheng Hoe David Brin Bernard Ogilvie Dodge Star Wars Karel Capek Hudson River School Alfred Hitchcock Vladimir Colin Robert Kroetsch Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai Stephen Sondheim Robert Ludlum Frank Frazetta Walter Tevis Sax Rohmer Rafael Sabatini Ralph Nader Manon Gropius Aristide Maillol Ed Roth Jonathan Dordick Abdur Razzaq (Professor) John W.
    [Show full text]
  • What Literature Knows: Forays Into Literary Knowledge Production
    Contributions to English 2 Contributions to English and American Literary Studies 2 and American Literary Studies 2 Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Kai Merten (eds.) Merten Kai / What Literature Knows This volume sheds light on the nexus between knowledge and literature. Arranged What Literature Knows historically, contributions address both popular and canonical English and Antje Kley US-American writing from the early modern period to the present. They focus on how historically specific texts engage with epistemological questions in relation to Forays into Literary Knowledge Production material and social forms as well as representation. The authors discuss literature as a culturally embedded form of knowledge production in its own right, which deploys narrative and poetic means of exploration to establish an independent and sometimes dissident archive. The worlds that imaginary texts project are shown to open up alternative perspectives to be reckoned with in the academic articulation and public discussion of issues in economics and the sciences, identity formation and wellbeing, legal rationale and political decision-making. What Literature Knows The Editors Antje Kley is professor of American Literary Studies at FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany. Her research interests focus on aesthetic forms and cultural functions of narrative, both autobiographical and fictional, in changing media environments between the eighteenth century and the present. Kai Merten is professor of British Literature at the University of Erfurt, Germany. His research focuses on contemporary poetry in English, Romantic culture in Britain as well as on questions of mediality in British literature and Postcolonial Studies. He is also the founder of the Erfurt Network on New Materialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Painting by Joseph Anton Koch Returns to the Städel
    AiA news-service Painting by Joseph Anton Koch returns to the Städel Joseph Anton Koch (1768–1839), Landscape with the Prophet Balaam and his donkey, ca. 1832. Oil on canvas, 74 x 102 cm. Photo: Städel Museum. FRANKFURT.- The painting Landscape with the Prophet Balaam and his donkey (ca. 1832) by the artist Joseph Anton Koch (1768–1839) is returning to the Städel Museum. The work from the museum’s collection was considered lost in 1945 and was recently rediscovered in a private collection. Thanks to the generous gesture of returning the work from private ownership, it is now once again on view in the Städel. For its presentation within the collection of nineteenth century art, the painting was carefully restored and newly framed by the museum. It is thus once again part of the Städel’s extensive collection of works by Joseph Anton Koch. A total of three paintings, thirteen drawings and forty-nine prints provide profound insight into the oeuvre of the artist, whose impact on German art in the nineteenth century cannot be overestimated. “We are indebted to the former owner for the extraordinary gesture and generosity in returning the painting to the Städel Museum. Since the founding of the Städel in 1815, this work has been one of the early, impressive acquisitions of contemporary art. With the return of the work, it will once again be possible to show the full spectrum of Joseph Anton Koch’s oeuvre in the museum”, says Philipp Demandt, Director of the Städel Museum. “Joseph Anton Koch was one of the outstanding landscape painters of the early nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Krzysztof Penderecki's Eighth Symphony
    Interdisciplinary Studies in Musicology 8,2009 © Department o f Musicology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland REGINA CHLOPICKA (Krakow) Krzysztof Penderecki’s Eighth Symphony, ‘Lieder der Vergänglichkeit’ - from inspiration by nature to existential reflection The beauty of nature, which reflects the spirit o f its Creator, lies beyond the reach of human endeavour (Saint Augustine)1 That this your art as far as possible Follows, as the disciple doth the master; So that ypor art is, as it were, God’s grandchild. (Aristotle according to Dante)2 ABSTRACT: In the Penderecki oeuvre, symphonic music has been pivotal, with eight symphonies written over the span of forty years, including Symphony No. 6, which remains in the sketch stage. As he admits, the sequence of symphonies constitutes a sort of musical autobiography. In the life and work of Penderecki his interests in nature and culture have long run parallel, and in both spheres the moment of creation has been particularly signifi­ cant. Penderecki’s artistic work has clearly focused on two domains: composing music and moulding the nature which surrounds his Luslawice house - the space of the gar­ den and park. The latter type of art concerns nature not in its primeval form, but rather in the shape imposed on it by man. Over the last decade, the composer’s two passions have tended to drift closer to­ gether and intertwine. During this time, he has written his Eighth Symphony (‘Lieder der Vergänglichkeit’), devoted to trees, and Three Chinese Songs, permeated by his enchantment with the beauty of nature. In his Eighth Symphony, Penderecki employs poetic and musical images to show the beauty and diversity of the forms of the surrounding world of nature, in which it is given to man to live the successive phases of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Literary and Cultural Translata Bility: the European Romantic Example
    Literary and Cultural Translata bility: The European Romantic Example Ian Fairly Abstract This essay presents an overview of Western and Central European thinking about translation in the Romantic period of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. In it, I seek to delineate a convergence of aesthetic and cultural theory in the Romantic preoccupation with translation. Among other things, my discussion is interested in how translation in this period engages debate about what it means to be a ‘national’ writer creating a ‘national’ literature. I offer this essay in the hope that its meditation on literary and cultural translatability and untranslatability will resonate with readers in their own quite different contexts. One of the central statements on translation by a British Romantic writer occurs in Samuel Taylor Coleridge's Biographia Literaria (1817). Reflecting on the achievements of Wordsworth's verse, Coleridge proposes that the " infallible test of a blameless style " in poetry is " its untranslatableness in words of the same language without injury to the meaning ". This is at once a prescription for fault-finding and an index of immaculacy. A utopian strain sounds through Coleridge's " infallible " and " blameless ", suggesting that an unfallen integrity may be remade, or critically rediscovered, in the uniqueness of poetic utterance. Translation Today Vol. 2 No. 2 Oct. 2005 © CIIL 2005 Literary and Cultural Translata bility: 93 The European Romantic Example Where Wordsworth's " meditative pathos " and " imaginative power " are expressed in verse which cannot be other than it is Coleridge asserts a vital congruence between the particular and the universal. Yet his formula does not preclude the translational recovery of that expressive pathos and power in words of another language.
    [Show full text]
  • GERMAN LITERARY FAIRY TALES, 1795-1848 by CLAUDIA MAREIKE
    ROMANTICISM, ORIENTALISM, AND NATIONAL IDENTITY: GERMAN LITERARY FAIRY TALES, 1795-1848 By CLAUDIA MAREIKE KATRIN SCHWABE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2012 1 © 2012 Claudia Mareike Katrin Schwabe 2 To my beloved parents Dr. Roman and Cornelia Schwabe 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisory committee chair, Dr. Barbara Mennel, who supported this project with great encouragement, enthusiasm, guidance, solidarity, and outstanding academic scholarship. I am particularly grateful for her dedication and tireless efforts in editing my chapters during the various phases of this dissertation. I could not have asked for a better, more genuine mentor. I also want to express my gratitude to the other committee members, Dr. Will Hasty, Dr. Franz Futterknecht, and Dr. John Cech, for their thoughtful comments and suggestions, invaluable feedback, and for offering me new perspectives. Furthermore, I would like to acknowledge the abundant support and inspiration of my friends and colleagues Anna Rutz, Tim Fangmeyer, and Dr. Keith Bullivant. My heartfelt gratitude goes to my family, particularly my parents, Dr. Roman and Cornelia Schwabe, as well as to my brother Marius and his wife Marina Schwabe. Many thanks also to my dear friends for all their love and their emotional support throughout the years: Silke Noll, Alice Mantey, Lea Hüllen, and Tina Dolge. In addition, Paul and Deborah Watford deserve special mentioning who so graciously and welcomingly invited me into their home and family. Final thanks go to Stephen Geist and his parents who believed in me from the very start.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Schleiermacher's on Religion Eric Watkins Humanities 4
    Information for Schleiermacher’s On Religion Eric Watkins Humanities 4 UCSD Friedrich Schleiermacher is the most important Protestant theologian of the period and is a major proponent of Romanticism. In On Religion he articulates his own conception of religion, against Enlightenment conceptions of religion (such as Kant’s) and against conceptions of Romanticism (like Schiller’s) that do not attribute any significant role to religion (or religious experience). Rather than thinking that one should simply focus on being a good person by doing one’s duty (and hope that God will reward good behavior in an afterlife, if there is one), Schleiermacher thinks that religion is essentially about one’s personal immediate relation to a higher power, the infinite, or God, which he identifies with Nature as a whole. Historical and Intellectual Background: •Kant emphasized the importance of morality and thought that whatever was important about religion could be reduced to morality. So to be a genuine Christian would require not that one have just the right theological beliefs (e.g., about transubstantiation or the trinity), but rather that one act according to the Categorical Imperative. The Kingdom of Ends formulation of the Categorical Imperative is, in effect, a religious expression of the moral law, but the religious connotations are not essential to his basic idea, which is most fundamentally secular (because based solely on reason, which is the same for everyone, regardless of their religious beliefs). Kant coins an interesting phrase in referring to “the invisible church”; the idea is that what matters is not the physical buildings that one might worship in, but rather the moral relations that obtain between free rational agents (and which generate our obligations not to lie, harm others, commit suicide, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • 9781469658254 WEB.Pdf
    Literary Paternity, Literary Friendship From 1949 to 2004, UNC Press and the UNC Department of Germanic & Slavic Languages and Literatures published the UNC Studies in the Germanic Languages and Literatures series. Monographs, anthologies, and critical editions in the series covered an array of topics including medieval and modern literature, theater, linguistics, philology, onomastics, and the history of ideas. Through the generous support of the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, books in the series have been reissued in new paperback and open access digital editions. For a complete list of books visit www.uncpress.org. Literary Paternity, Literary Friendship Essays in Honor of Stanley Corngold edited by gerhard richter UNC Studies in the Germanic Languages and Literatures Number 125 Copyright © 2002 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons cc by-nc-nd license. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons. org/licenses. Suggested citation: Richter, Gerhard. Literary Paternity, Liter- ary Friendship: Essays in Honor of Stanley Corngold. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.5149/9780807861417_Richter Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Richter, Gerhard, editor. Title: Literary paternity, literary friendship : essays in honor of Stanley Corngold / edited by Gerhard Richter. Other titles: University of North Carolina studies in the Germanic languages and literatures ; no. 125. Description: Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press, [2002] Series: University of North Carolina studies in the Germanic languages and literatures | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: lccn 2001057825 | isbn 978-1-4696-5824-7 (pbk: alk. paper) | isbn 978-1-4696-5825-4 (ebook) Subjects: German literature — History and criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • German Nationalism and the Allegorical Female in Karl Friedrich Schinkel's the Hall of Stars
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2012-04-17 German Nationalism and the Allegorical Female in Karl Friedrich Schinkel's The Hall of Stars Allison Slingting Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Art Practice Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Slingting, Allison, "German Nationalism and the Allegorical Female in Karl Friedrich Schinkel's The Hall of Stars" (2012). Theses and Dissertations. 3170. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3170 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact scholarsarchive@byu.edu, ellen_amatangelo@byu.edu. German Nationalism and the Allegorical Female in Karl Friedrich Schinkel’s The Hall of Stars Allison Sligting Mays A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Heather Belnap Jensen, Chair Robert B. McFarland Martha Moffitt Peacock Department of Visual Arts Brigham Young University August 2012 Copyright © 2012 Allison Sligting Mays All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT German Nationalism and the Allegorical Female in Karl Friedrich Schinkel’s The Hall of Stars Allison Sligting Mays Department of Visual Arts, BYU Master of Arts In this thesis I consider Karl Friedrich Schinkel’s The Hall of Stars in the Palace of the Queen of the Night (1813), a set design of Die Zauberflöte (The Magic Flute), in relation to female audiences during a time of Germanic nationalism.
    [Show full text]