DOCSLIB.ORG

The Epistemic Contract of Bisexual Erasure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TheEpistemic Contract of Bisexual Erasure KenjiYoshino* In thisarticle, Professor Kenji Yoshino seeks to explainwhy the category of bisexualityhas beenerased in contemporaryAmerican political and legal discourse.He firstargues that the invisibility ofbisexuality relative to homo- sexualitydoes not reflect the incidences of those orientations in thepopulation. Definingbisexuality as thepossession of more than incidental desire for both sexes,Yoshino shows that the major sexuality studies demonstrate that the inci- denceof bisexuality is infact greater than or comparableto theincidence of homosexuality.Yoshino explains the erasure of bisexualityby positing that bothself-identified heterosexuals and self-identified homosexuals have overlap- ping interestsin theerasure of bisexualitythat lead theminto an "epistemic contract"of bisexual erasure. These interests include: (1) thestabilization of exclusivesexual orientation categories; (2) theretention of sex as an important diacriticalaxis; and (3) theprotection of normsof monogamy.Noting that suchcontracts tend to becomevisible only when they are challenged,Yoshino describeshow bisexualshave increasinglycontested their own erasure. Fi- nally,Yoshino examines the effects of bisexual invisibility and visibilityin the legal realm,focusing on thesexual harassment jurisprudence of recentdec- ades. * AssociateProfessor, Yale Law School. I thankAkhil Amar, Ian Ayres,Jennifer Gerarda Brown,Ariela Dubler, Bill Eskridge,Oren Izenberg, Robert Post, Bill Rubenstein,Vicki Schultz, RevaSiegel, and Amanda Tyler. I am also gratefulto participants in workshops at ColumbiaLaw School,Fordham Law School,and Yale Law School,as wellas studentsin myTheorizing Sexual- ityseminar at Yale and LarryLessig's Advanced Constitutional Law seminarat Harvard.Rick Baker,Romana Mancini, Ravenna Michalsen, Zachary Potter, Rose Saxe, and EricSonnenschein suppliedexcellent research assistance. 353 This content downloaded from 130.132.173.76 on Sun, 2 Jun 2013 16:33:04 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 354 STANFORDLAWREVIEW [Vol.52:353 INTRODUCTION ..... 356 I. THE ERASUREOF BISEXUALS ....363 A. BisexualInvisibility . .364 1. Bisexualinvisibility defined . .364 2. Evidenceof bisexual invisibility . .368 B. BisexualErasure . .370 1. Bisexualitydefined . .370 2. Thestudies . .377 a. Kinsey(1948 & 1953).380 b. Mastersand Johnson (1979) .382 c. Janusand Janus (1 993) .383 d. Wellings(1994) .383 e. Laumann(1994) .385 f. Critiquesof the studies ........................................... 386 C. BisexualErasure as a Cause ofBisexual Invisibility ... 388 II. THE EPISTEMICCONTRACT OF BISEXUALERASURE ........................... 388 A. DifferentExplanations . ............................389 B. TheEpistemic Contract Defined . .........................................391 C. Strategiesof Erasure . .............................395 1. Straightdeployments of thestrategies . .........................395 2. Gaydeployments of the strategies . ............................397 D. TheEpistemic Contract as a Cause ofBisexual Erasure ... 399 III. MONOSEXUALINVESTMENTS IN THE EPISTEMICCONTRACT .......... 399 A. Stabilizationof Sexual Orientation . ..........................................400 1. Sharedinvestment ......................................... 400 2. Straightinvestment ........................................ 402 3. Gay investment ........................................... 404 B. BisexualityDestabilizes the Primacy of Sex .................................. 410 1. Sharedinvestment ......................................... 411 a. Destabilization........................................... 412 b. Thetension between public and private treatmentsof sex ........................................... 413 2. Straightinvestment ........................................ 415 3. Gay investment ........................................... 417 This content downloaded from 130.132.173.76 on Sun, 2 Jun 2013 16:33:04 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Jan.2000] BISEXUALERASURE 355 C. BisexualityDestabilizes Norms of Monogamy .............................. 420 1. Sharedinvestment .............................................. 421 2. Straightinvestment .............................................. 423 3. Gay investment.............................................. 426 D. OverlappingMonosexual Investments as a Cause ofthe Epistemic Contract .............................................. 428 IV. SELF-IDENTIFIEDBISEXUALS AND THE EPISTEMIC CONTRACT ....... 429 A. BisexualCapitulation to theEpistemic Contract .......................... 430 B. BisexualResistance to theEpistemic Contract ............................. 431 C. TheDissolution of the Epistemic Contract . ........................434 V. BISEXUALITYAND SEXUALHARASSMENT LAW . .................................434 A. A Summaryof the Development of the Sexual HarassmentJurisprudence ..................................... 436 B. BisexualVisibility-The Recognition and Closingof the BisexualHarassment Exemption . ................................439 1. Therecognition of the bisexual harassment exemption- bisexualvisibility ............... ............................... 440 2. (Incoherently)closing the bisexual harassment exemption-bisexualinvisibility ............................................. 442 3. (Coherently)closing the bisexual harassment exemption-bisexualvisibility (again) .................................... 444 C. Recognizingand Closingthe Horseplay Exemption ..................... 446 1. Understandinghorseplay- thehomosocial and thehomoerotic ........................................ 448 2. Recognizingthe horseplay exemption- bisexualinvisibility .............................................. 450 3. Closingthe horseplay exemption- bisexualvisibility ............... ............................... 451 D. SexualHarassment at a Crossroads . .............................454 1. Thepost-Oncale status quo .............................................. 454 2. Bisexualityas goad .................. ............................ 457 E. OtherApplications .................... .......................... 458 CONCLUSION.............................................. 460 This content downloaded from 130.132.173.76 on Sun, 2 Jun 2013 16:33:04 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 356 STANFORDLA WREVIEW [Vol. 52:353 INTRODUCTION Teachinga seminaron SexualOrientation and the Law, I facedan old inconsistencyso frontally that it became difficult toavoid giving it sustained attention.I began the course in what appears to be a commonway,l by pos- ingbasic questionsabout sexual orientation. I askedwhy contemporary Americansociety2 organizes people according to theirsexualities;3 why we do so onthe basis of sexual orientation inparticular;4 and why, when classi- fyingby sexual orientation, we insiston doingso withthe binary system of heterosexualand homosexual.5 In discussingthe last question, I adduced the 1. A leadingcasebook on sexualorientation and the law, for example, begins with such an in- troductoryunit. See WILLIAMB. RUBENSTEIN,CASES ANDMATERIALS ON SEXUALORIENTATION ANDTHE LAW 1-40 (2d ed. 1997) (presentingbackground materials discussing sexual classifica- tions). 2. Thesetemporal and geographical restrictions apply to thisentire analysis. These restric- tionspartially recognize that the concept of orientation is culturally specific. See note77 infraand accompanyingtext (describing Latin bisexuality). That recognition, however, will unfortunately be incomplete,insofar as itignores variations within modem American society based on, for example, culture,race, and class. See, e.g.,Will Roscoe, How to Becomea Beardache:Toward a Unified Analysisof GenderDiversity, in THIRD SEX, THiRD GENDER:BEYOND SEXUALDIMORPHISM IN CULTUREAND HISTORY 329, 330-49(Gilbert Herdt ed., 1994) (describingthe Native American berdache,an identitybased on genderatypicality that cuts across the orientation categories consid- eredhere, as an identitythat is moresocially salient in manyNative American societies than those orientationcategories). 3. Resistanceto theclassification ofpersons according to theirsexualities can be seenin that usageof the word "queer" which refers to individuals who fall outside of the realm of the "normal," eitherbecause of theirsexuality or forsome other reason. See MichaelWarner, Introduction to FEAROF A QUEERPLANET: QUEER POLITICSAND SOCIALTHEORY vii, xxvi-xxviii(Michael War- nered., 1993). Thisusage's "aggressive impulse of generalization," id. at xxvi,resists the reifica- tionof sexualityas an axis of demarcationby recastingthe conflict between sexual deviance and sexualnormalcy as onebetween social deviance and social normalcy. 4. Resistanceto theclassification of personsaccording to theirsexual orientations can be foundin Eve Sedgwick'sprovocative list of alternativeclassifications. See EVE KoSOFSKY SEDGWICK,EPISTEMOLOGY OF THECLOSET 25-26(1990). Sedgwicknotes that even if we setout to distinguishbetween people based on theirsexualities, many other axes besidessex of object choiceare available. See id. at 25. Forexample, "[s]exuality makes up a largeshare of theself- perceivedidentity of somepeople, a smallshare of others"';"[s]ome people spend a lot of time thinkingabout sex, others little"; and "[s]ome people like to have a lotof sex, others little or none." Id. Indeed,Sedgwick contends that the rise of sex ofobject choice as thecritical axis of definition was a contingentand puzzling historical development out of an era in whichsuch other axes had analogousdiacritical
Recommended publications
  • The George Wright Forum

    The George Wright Forum

    The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 34 number 3 • 2017 Society News, Notes & Mail • 243 Announcing the Richard West Sellars Fund for the Forum Jennifer Palmer • 245 Letter from Woodstock Values We Hold Dear Rolf Diamant • 247 Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage Rebecca Conard and John H. Sprinkle, Jr., guest editors Dedication•252 Planned Obsolescence: Maintenance of the National Park Service’s History Infrastructure John H. Sprinkle, Jr. • 254 Shining Light on Civil War Battlefield Preservation and Interpretation: From the “Dark Ages” to the Present at Stones River National Battlefield Angela Sirna • 261 Farming in the Sweet Spot: Integrating Interpretation, Preservation, and Food Production at National Parks Cathy Stanton • 275 The Changing Cape: Using History to Engage Coastal Residents in Community Conversations about Climate Change David Glassberg • 285 Interpreting the Contributions of Chinese Immigrants in Yosemite National Park’s History Yenyen F. Chan • 299 Nānā I Ke Kumu (Look to the Source) M. Melia Lane-Kamahele • 308 A Perilous View Shelton Johnson • 315 (continued) Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage (cont’d) Some Challenges of Preserving and Exhibiting the African American Experience: Reflections on Working with the National Park Service and the Carter G. Woodson Home National Historic Site Pero Gaglo Dagbovie • 323 Exploring American Places with the Discovery Journal: A Guide to Co-Creating Meaningful Interpretation Katie Crawford-Lackey and Barbara Little • 335 Indigenous Cultural Landscapes: A 21st-Century Landscape-scale Conservation and Stewardship Framework Deanna Beacham, Suzanne Copping, John Reynolds, and Carolyn Black • 343 A Framework for Understanding Off-trail Trampling Impacts in Mountain Environments Ross Martin and David R.
  • Allies (Like You!) Are a Vital Believe That We Exist

    Allies (Like You!) Are a Vital Believe That We Exist

    how to be an Learn More What is Bi+? Bisexual Resource Center The BRC uses “bisexual” and “bi+” as umbrella terms for people who recognize and honor their Brochures, handouts, links to research, find bi+ potential for sexual and emotional attraction groups: to more than one gender (pansexual, fluid, www.biresource.org omnisexual, queer, and all other free-identifiers). We celebrate and affirm the diversity of identity Bisexual Health Awareness Month and expression regardless of labels. to a bi+ person Learn about bi+ health disparities at www.bihealthmonth.org Our Vision The Bisexual Resource Center envisions a world Bi Women Quarterly where love is celebrated, regardless of sexual Read essays, fiction, poems, and see visual art from orientation or gender expression. Because bisexuals bi+ women around the world: today are still misunderstood, marginalized and www.biwomenboston.org/newsletter discriminated against, the BRC is committed to providing support to the bisexual community and Still Bisexual raising public awareness about bisexuality and Watch videos of people telling their own bi+ bisexual people. stories: www.stillbisexual.com How to Support Us The BiCast A bi+ podcast: www.thebicast.org The BRC is primarily funded through the generosity of our donors. There are many ways you can give. BiNet USA Website: www.biresource.org/donate Learn more about this national bi+ organization: Paypal: [email protected] www.binetusa.org Venmo: @bisexualresourcecenter Bisexual Organizing Project Want to volunteer your time? Email us at Hosts the BECAUSE conference and hosts groups [email protected] in Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN: www.bisexualorganizingproject.org © 2018 Bisexual Resource Center PO Box 170796 Boston, MA 02117 American Institute of Bisexuality 617.424.9595 | www.biresource.org www.americaninstituteofbisexuality.org The Bisexual Resource Center is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) educational organization incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
  • Gallagher-Cohoon

    Gallagher-Cohoon

    Illegal Loves and Sexual Deviancy: Homosexuality as a Threat in Cold War Canada Erin Gallagher-Cohoon This paper analyzes the criminalization and medicalization of homosexuality during the early twentieth century in Canada. Through court records and medical texts the discourse of homosexuality as a threat to the family unit and to the nation is contextualized within Cold War rhetoric. A Foucaultian conceptualization of power and discipline helps frame questions regarding homosexuality as a criminal offense and as a mental illness. It is argued that both state control and societal pressures constructed the homosexual as criminal, the homosexual as mental patient and, as a result, the homosexual as Communist threat. On the 15th of December, 1947, three personal letters were entered as evidence in the court case of James A. Hall, who was accused of “unlawfully commit[ting] an act of gross indecency.” In one, the accused wrote, “‘Thank you’ again for everything, mostly for your love -your consideration and the honor of being able to call you ‘my own.’” The only feature that made this private declaration of love a matter of state intervention was that Hall's lover was another man, Charles Orton. Both men, in their testimony, blamed the other as the sexual aggressor. This contrasts the affectionate and occasionally erotic tone of their private correspondence. Hall pleaded guilty and was sentenced to nine months of imprisonment. Orton, for his part, reappeared several times in the court records as both witness and defendant.1 But how did a moment of private eroticism become a matter of criminal importance? While court records provide an entry point into the criminalization of male homosexuality during the Cold War era in Canada, the discourse and rhetoric surrounding this marginalized group are also seen in psychiatric and other mental health texts.
  • Attitudes Toward Bisexuality According to Sexual Orientation and Gender

    Attitudes Toward Bisexuality According to Sexual Orientation and Gender

    Fairfield University DigitalCommons@Fairfield Graduate School of Education & Allied GSEAP Faculty Publications Professions 7-2016 Attitudes Toward Bisexuality According to Sexual Orientation and Gender Katherine M. Hertlein Erica E. Hartwell Fairfield University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/education-facultypubs Copyright 2016 Taylor and Francis. A post-print has been archived with permission from the copyright holder. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Bisexuality in 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/ 15299716.2016.1200510 Peer Reviewed Repository Citation Hertlein, Katherine M. and Hartwell, Erica E., "Attitudes Toward Bisexuality According to Sexual Orientation and Gender" (2016). GSEAP Faculty Publications. 126. https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/education-facultypubs/126 Published Citation Hertlein, Katherine M., Erica E. Hartwell, and Mashara E. Munns. "Attitudes Toward Bisexuality According to Sexual Orientation and Gender." Journal of Bisexuality (July 2016) 16(3): 1-22. This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected].
  • Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: an Argument from Bisexuality

    Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: an Argument from Bisexuality

    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2012 Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality Michael Boucai University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Gender and Sexuality Commons Recommended Citation Michael Boucai, Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality, 49 San Diego L. Rev. 415 (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/66 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality MICHAEL BOUCAI* TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.........................................................416 II. SEXUAL LIBERTY AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE .............................. 421 A. A Right To Choose Homosexual Relations and Relationships.........................................421 B. Marriage'sBurden on the Right............................426 1. Disciplineor Punishment?.... 429 2. The Burden's Substance and Magnitude. ................... 432 III. BISEXUALITY AND MARRIAGE.. .........................................
  • Q&A on BISEXUALS: Examining Stereotypes

    Q&A on BISEXUALS: Examining Stereotypes

    Q&A ON BISEXUALS: Examining Stereotypes and Misconceptions Q: What is bisexuality? A: Bisexuality is the capacity for physical, romantic, and/or emotional attraction to more than one gender/sex. A bisexual identity affirms a reality beyond dualistic categories of sexual orientation and challenges the foundation of binary thinking in this regard. Q: Do bisexuals have to have partners of different genders/sexes to be satisfied? A: Bisexuality is the potential—not the requirement—for involvement with more than one gender/sex. This involvement may mean sexually, emotionally, in reality, or in fantasy. Some bisexuals may have concurrent partners; others may relate to different genders/sexes at various time periods. Most bisexuals do not have to be involved with more than one gender/sex at a time in order to feel fulfilled. Q: Aren’t bisexuals “oversexed”? A: Attraction does not necessitate acting on every desire. Just as there is a range of behaviors within heterosexual society and the lesbian and gay communities, there is also a range within the bisexual community. Some have one partner; some choose to be single; some have multiple partners; some bisexuals are celibate. The bisexual population has the same variety of sexual activity as other groups. Q: Can bisexuals be counted on for long-term committed relationships? A: A bisexual, like a lesbian, gay or heterosexual identity is independent of relationship choices: monogamous; polyamorous; non-monogamous; or whatever the parties agree upon. Bisexuals are as capable as anyone else of making a long-term monogamous commitment if that bisexual is also a monogamous person.
  • Polyamorous Millennials in Therapy: Interpreting Experiences to Inform Care

    Polyamorous Millennials in Therapy: Interpreting Experiences to Inform Care

    POLYAMOROUS MILLENNIALS IN THERAPY: INTERPRETING EXPERIENCES TO INFORM CARE A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Antioch University Seattle Seattle, WA In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements of the Degree Doctor of Psychology By Rebecca Calhoun-Shepard September 2019 POLYAMOROUS MILLENNIALS IN THERAPY: INTERPRETING EXPERIENCES TO INFORM CARE This dissertation, by Rebecca Calhoun-Shepard, has been approved by the Committee Members signed below who recommend that it be accepted by the faculty of the Antioch University Seattle at Seattle, WA in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Committee: ______________________________ William Heusler, Psy.D. Chairperson _____________________________ Christopher Heffner, Ph.D., Psy.D. _____________________________ Ashley Strauss, Psy.D. _____________________________ Date ii © Copyright by Rebecca Calhoun-Shepard, 2019 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT POLYAMOROUS MILLENNIALS IN THERAPY: INTERPRETING EXPERIENCES TO INFORM CARE Rebecca Calhoun-Shepard Antioch University Seattle Seattle, WA Polyamory (poly) refers to a way of loving involving multiple concurrent romantic relationships. It has been suggested that consensual non-monogamies are becoming increasingly visible, particularly in the millennial generation. This warrants exploration of cultural considerations and the unique needs of this population to inform care and minimize potential for harm. The present study used interpretative analysis to explore the phenomenon of polyamorous millennials in therapy as described across semi-structured interviews with therapists and poly clients. Three primary themes emerged from aggregate data, including Idiographic Experiences in Therapy, Therapy with Polyamorous Millennials, and information about Polyamory and Millennials beyond a therapy context. These themes synthesized participants’ accounts of satisfying, desired, and unsatisfying experiences in therapy, as well as recommendations for and the qualities of a preferred therapist.
  • Butch-Femme by Teresa Theophano

    Butch-Femme by Teresa Theophano

    Butch-Femme by Teresa Theophano Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com A butch-femme couple The concept of butch and femme identities have long been hotly debated within the participating in a group lesbian community, yet even achieving a consensus as to exactly what the terms wedding ceremony in "butch" and "femme" mean can be extraordinarily difficult. In recent years, these Taiwan. words have come to describe a wide spectrum of individuals and their relationships. It is easiest, then, to begin with an examination of butch-femme culture and meaning from a historical perspective. Butch and femme emerged in the early twentieth century as a set of sexual and emotional identities among lesbians. To give a general but oversimplified idea of what butch-femme entails, one might say that butches exhibit traditionally "masculine" traits while femmes embody "feminine" ones. Although oral histories have demonstrated that butch-femme couples were seen in America as far back as the turn of the twentieth century, and that they were particularly conspicuous in the 1930s, it is the mid-century working-class and bar culture that most clearly illustrate the archetypal butch-femme dynamic. Arguably, during the period of the 1940s through the early 1960s, butches and femmes were easiest to recognize and characterize: butches with their men's clothing, DA haircuts, and suave manners often found their more traditionally styled femme counterparts, wearing dresses, high heels, and makeup, in the gay bars. A highly visible and accepted way of living within the lesbian community, butch-femme was in fact considered the norm among lesbians during the 1950s.
  • True Colors Resource Guide

    True Colors Resource Guide

    bois M gender-neutral M t t F F INTERSEXALLY Lesbian butch INTERSEXALLY Lesbian polyamorousBirls queer Femme queer bisexual GAY GrrlsAsexual bisexual GAY bi-curious bi-curious QUEstioningtransgender bi-confident pansexualtranssexual QUEstioningtransgender bois bois gender-neutral M gender-neutralLOVEM gender-neutral t t F F INTERSEXALLY Lesbian butch INTERSEXALLY Lesbian butch Birls polyamorousBirls polyamorousBirls queer Femme queer Femme Asexual bisexual GAY GrrlsAsexual bisexual GAY GrrlsAsexual bi-curious bi-curious transsexual QUEstioningtransgender bi-confident pansexualtranssexual QUEstioningtransgender bi-confident pansexualtranssexual bois M gender-neutral gender-neutral M t t F F ALLY Lesbian INTERSEX butch INTERSEXALLY Birls polyamorousBirls queer Femme queer bisexual Asexual GAY GrrlsAsexual bisexual bi-curious bi-curious transsexual QUEstioningtransgender bi-confident pansexualtranssexual QUEstioningtransgender bois bois LOVE gender-neutral M gender-neutral t F INTERSEXALLY Lesbian butch INTERSEXALLY Lesbian butch polyamorousBirls polyamorousBirls queer Femme queer Femme bisexual GAY GrrlsAsexual bisexual GAY GrrlsAsexual bi-curious bi-curious QUEstioningtransgender bi-confident pansexualtranssexual QUEstioningtransgender bi-confident pansexualtranssexual bois bois M gender-neutral M gender-neutral t t F F INTERSEXALLY Lesbian butch INTERSEXALLY Lesbian butch polyamorousBirls polyamorousBirls queer Femme queer Femme bisexual GAY GrrlsAsexual bisexual GAY GrrlsAsexual bi-curious bi-curious QUEstioningtransgender bi-confident
  • Homosexuality' and Social Theory

    Homosexuality' and Social Theory

    Homosexuality sexwithothermen,thishasoftenbeencon- tested and transformed given its clinical and GARY KINSMAN male-centered character by the gay, lesbian Laurentian University, Canada feminist, and what is often now referred to as LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans), Social theory is the various ways in which or queer movements, through the use of a people have theorized how the “social” works range of other terms and identifications. In in the emerging and developing capitalist this entry, “homosexuality” is used in a broad social relations of the last few centuries. “Ho- sense to include all those who participate mosexuality” is a term that emerges in the in same-gender erotic practices no matter later nineteenth century in the “West” in the howtheysociallyidentifyandalsotoasso- midst of capitalist and state relations among ciate this with challenges to the two-gender psychiatrists and sexologists to describe the (male–female) binary system that includes “truth” of people’s beings (Foucault 1980) trans experiences. whohadsexwithmembersofthesamegen- der, especially men who had sex with other HETEROSEXISM, DEVIANCE, men. Bringing social theory together with AND SOCIAL THEORIZING “homosexuality” combines broader social analysis with the realm of bodies and eroti- The ideology and practices organizing the cism and how “homosexualities” are lived, oppression of homosexuals are often referred constructed, and analyzed. It joins together to as heterosexism – the assumption that only what has often been described as the “pub- heterosexuality is “normal” and “natural” lic” and “political” realms, often considered and therefore that homosexualities are not the proper terrain for social theory, with normal and are unnatural. Classical and whathasoftenbeenportrayedasa“private” modern social theory did not simply ignore realm of erotic desires and practices that was or forget about homosexuality but heterosex- not considered the proper terrain for social ist assumptions emerged at the very heart of theory.
  • Sample Song List Murphy Knows Over 2000+ Covers. Here Is Sample List Of

    Sample Song List Murphy Knows Over 2000+ Covers. Here Is Sample List Of

    Acoustic 60’s to now 07807603836 [email protected] www.MurphyJamesMusic.com Sample Song List Murphy knows over 2000+ covers. Here is sample list of a few songs but there are many more that aren't on this list so please feel free to request anything else. If Murphy knows it, he will be sure to play it for you. 500 miles – The Proclaimers A little respect – Erasure A sky full of stars - Coldplay A thousand years – Christina Peri Africa - Toto Ain't no sunshine – Bill Withers Ain’t nobody – Chaka Khan Alcoholic – Starsailor All about you - McFly All I want is you – U2 All night long – Lionel Richie All of me – John Legend All the small things – Blink 182 Always on my mind – Elvis Presley America – Razorlight America – Neil Diamond American Pie – Don McClean Am I wrong – Nico & Vinz Angel of Harlem – U2 Angels – Robbie Williams Another brick in the wall – Pink Floyd Another day in Paradise – Phil Collins Apologize – One Republic Ashes – Embrace A sky full of stars - Coldplay A-team - Ed Sheeran Babel – Mumford & Sons Baby can I hold you – Tracy Chapman Baby I love your way – Peter Frampton Baby one more time – Britney Spears Babylon – David Gray Back for good – Take That Back to black – Amy Winehouse Bad moon rising – Credence Clearwater Revival Be mine – David Gray Be my baby – The Ronettes Beautiful noise – Neil Diamond Beautiful war – Kings of Leon Best of you – Foo Fighters Better – Tom Baxter Big love – Fleetwood Mac Big yellow taxi – Joni Mitchell Black and gold – Sam Sparro Black is the colour – Christie Moore Bloodstream
  • Sexual Orientations and Perceptions of Jealousy Evanie Eve Atencio Walden University

    Sexual Orientations and Perceptions of Jealousy Evanie Eve Atencio Walden University

    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2017 Sexual Orientations and Perceptions of Jealousy Evanie Eve Atencio Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Evanie Atencio has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Scott Friedman, Committee Chairperson, Psychology Faculty Dr. Michael Johnson, Committee Member, Psychology Faculty Dr. Stephen Rice, University Reviewer, Psychology Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2017 Abstract Sexual Orientations and Perceptions of Jealousy by Evanie Atencio MAED, University of Phoenix, 2007 MBA, Regis University, 2002 BS, University of Phoenix, 1998 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Clinical Psychology Walden University May 2017 Abstract This study examined the participants’ level of jealousy towards their significant other and how it affects the longevity and commitment of their respective relationships. Based on a review of the literature, the research filled the gap of explaining the factor that affects the level of jealousy in monogamous relationships, particularly gender, and sexual orientation.