DUPLICATE Wai 814 I ( I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DUPLICATE Wai 814 I ( I I I DUPLICATE Wai 814 I ( I Ngai Tamanuhiri Land Alienation Report A report commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal Keith Pickens September 2000 1- ( 1 11 Contents 1 ( Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Ngai Tamanuhiri 1 1.2 Topography 5 1.3 Ngai Tamanuhiri in the 1860s 6 1.4 Relationship to Other Reports 7 Chapter 2: The Poverty Bay Commission 11 2.1 Maraetaha and Te Kuri 11 2.2 ~erovvhero 14 2.3 Pakovvhai 15 2.4 ~aretunoa 17 2.5 Tangotete 19 Chapter 3: Legislative Confusion 1869-1874 27 3.1 The Poverty Bay Grants Act, 1869 28 3.2 Joint Tenancy 29 Chapter 4: Maraetaha 1869-1880 35 4.1 Early Sales 37 4.2 Native Lands Frauds Prevention Act, 1870 38 4.3 Native Land Act, 1873 40 4.4 Maraetaha Lease 1869 40 4.5 W L Rees and Wi Pere 42 4.6 Land Trusts 43 4.7 Pru1ition of Maraetaha and Te Kuri 1880 44 4.8 The Trust Commission 44 4.9 The £3,000 47 4.10 The Lost Acres 47 Chapter 5: Maraetaha Partitions 1880-1988 51 5.1 Maraetaha lA 1880 - 1904 51 5.2 Maraetaha IB 1880 - 1902 53 5.3 Maraetaha 1C 57 5.4 Maraetaha ID (Te Kopua) 1880 - 1988 58 5.5 Part Maraetaha, DP 795 63 Chapter 6: Te Kuri 65 6.1 Te Kuri lA 65 6.2 Te Kuri 1B 66 111 I 1 6.3 Te Kuri 1 68 6.4 Te Kuri 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D 68 1( Chapter 7: The Advent of the Maori Land Court 69 1 7.1 The End of the Poverty Bay Commission 69 7.2 The Ngai Tahupo Block 70 1 7.3 The Poverty Bay Lands Titles Act, 1874 71 ( 7.4 The Native Land Court 72 7.5 Whareongaonga 74 7.5.1 Whareongaonga A 76 7.5.2 Whareongaonga B 77 7.5.3 Whareongaonga C 79 Chapter 8: Takararoa and Paritu 83 8.1 Takararoa 83 8.2 Paritu 84 8.3 The Ownership of Takararoa and Paritu 86 Chapter 9: Rahokapua and Umuhaku 95 9.1 The Owners of Rahokapua 96 9.2 Rahokapua 1B 9T 9.3 Rahokapua 2 98 9.4 Okahu 98 9.5 Umuhaku 99 9.6 Sale ofUmuhaku 99 9.7 Umuhaku lA and IB 101 Chapter 10: Maraetaha 2 105 10.1 The Investigation of Maraetaha 2 105 10.2 Maraetaha 2 Petitions 111 Chapter 11: Maraetaha 21883 -1954 119 11.1 The Carroll Pere Trusteeship 122 11.2 The Pmiition of Mm'aetaha 2 124 11.3 The Validation Court 125 11.4 The Validation Comi Hearing and Maraetaha 2 127 11.5 Maraetaha 2 Alienations 130 11.5.1 Trust Alienations 130 11.5.2 Private Alienations 130 11.6 Sununary of Alienations 134 IV I 1 Chapter 12: Puninga 139 12.1 The Herbert Interest 139 12.2 Partition 1891 140 12.3 Appeal 1895 147 12.4 Puninga Purchase Declined 144 12.5 Puninga and the Validation Court 145 12.6 Puninga Alienations 149 Chapter 13: Rangaiohinehau, Tarewauru, Tiraotane and Ranginui 155 13 .1 James Cattell 156 13.2 Maori Attitudes to Alienations 158 13.3 The Trust Commission 158 13.4 Land Prices 159 13.5 The Remnants 160 Chapter 14: Surveys and Rates 161 14.1 Survey Charges 161 14.2 Whareongaonga C 162 14.3 Rates 164 Chapter 15: Overview 165 15.1 Crown and Local Body Alienations 165 15.2 Crown Purchases 19th Century 167 15.3 Alienation of Trust Lands 168 15.4 Private Purchases: 19th Century 168 15.4.1 Maraetaha and Te Kuri 169 15.4.2 Tarewauru 171 15.4.3 Puninga 2 172 15.5 Private Purchases: 20lh Century 174 15.5 1 Private Purchases 1894-1909 174 15.6 The Stout Ngata Commission 177 15.7 Private Purchases 1909-1954 179 15.8 Private Purchases 1954-1991 182 15.9 Final Position 182 Appendix 187 Appendix A: Statements of Iwi/Hapu Identification 187 Appendix B: Ancestors Claimed 191 Sources 193 v List of Illustrations Figure 1: Location Map 3 Figure 2: Maraetaha, Te kuri and Pakowhai Blocks 10 Figure 3: Wharetunoa Block, 1926 18 Figure 4: Muriwai District Blocks 20 Figure 5: Johnson's Te Kuri Partition, 1892 48 Figure 6: Maraetaha Pruiitions 52 Figure 7: Te Kuri lA, 1927 64 Figure 8: Whareongaonga Paritions 73 Figure 9: Rahokapua, Okahu and Umuhaku Blocks 94 Figure 10: Mru'aetaha 2 Partitions 126 Figure 11: Maori POliion of Maraetaha 2 1882-1991 135 Figure 12: Puninga Block 138 Figure 13: Puninga Block, 1910 151 Figure 14: Rangaiohinehau, Tarewauru, Tiraotane ruld Ranginui Blocks 154 Figure 15: Categories ofNgai Tamanuhiri Land 166 VI I 1 Chapter 1 1 ( Introduction 1 In December 1868 over 270 'loyal chiefs and men' of Rongowhakaata, Te Aitanga-a­ 1 Mahala and Ngai Tahupo ceded their Poverty Bay lands to the Crown. l According to one contemporary estimate, this was an area of about 300,000 acres.2 A recent assessment is that the ceded area contained over 800,000 acres. 3 In Febmary 1869, the Governor, Sir George Bowen, gazetted the Crown's acceptance of the Poverty Bay cession. He also announced that native title over the lands in question had been extinguished.4 On the same day John Rogan and Henry Monro were appointed to a commission of inquiry.s The task of this commission, usually referred to as the Poverty Bay Commission, was to consider applications for the ceded lands. Those Maori who could prove both their loyalty and their title would receive their land back, by way of a cOlmnission award and a Crown grant. 1.1 Ngai Tamanuhiri Those directly affected by the 1868 ceSSIOn and subsequent developments were Rongowhalcaata, Te Aitanga-a-Mahaki and Ngai Tahupo. TIns repOli deals with the last of these three groups, Ngai Tahupo. In the document of cession, the Ngai Talmpo people were called a hapu. By descent, they derived from Tamanuhiri, more ilmnediately from Kahutia. 6 There were other descendants of Tamanuhiri in the Poverty Bay district in the 1 Copy of 1868 Deed of Cession in RDB, vol 131, P 50521 2 Halse to Rogan, 15 February 1869, NA file MA 62/8. RDB, vol 130, p 50163 3 Ward, A. National Overview. Wellington, Waitangi Tribunal, 1997, vol 2, p 201 4 ) New Zealand Gazette, 13 February 1869, P 60. RDB, vol 131, P 50524 5 New Zealand Gazette, 13 February 1869, pp 59-60. RDB, vol 131, P 50523f G Halbert, R. Horouta: The Histol)' ofthe Horouta Canoe, Gisborne and East Coast. Reed, 1999, p 268; Gudgeon, W. E. The Maori Tribes of the East Coast. Journal of the Polynesian Society, vol. 6, 1897, pp 175- 1860s, notably Ngati Rangiwaho. But for some reason, perhaps because of the prestige of 1 the Ngai Tahupo chief Tawheo Pohatu, perhaps also because ofPakeha mis-perception, the ( hapu name Ngai Tahupo seems to have functioned, in the middle of the 19th century, as an 1 umbrella for all of Tamanuhiri's descendants. In this name all of their land was ceded in 1868, including the southern Whareongaonga district, where Ngati Rangiwaho held the mana. In 1873, when a large area of the ceded land was returned, including land that belonged to Ngai Tamanuhiri hapu other than Ngai Tahupo, it was returned, so the minute book says, to Ngai TahupO.7 Towards the end of the 19th century, the name Ngai Tahupo fell into disuse: Ngai Tamanuhiri became the preferred label. At the same time, during the 1860s, 1870s and 1880s, it was possibly more common for Tamanuhiri's descendants to use hapu names as their main way of identifying themselves. The iwi affiliations of some of these descendants, it should be noted, were not necessarily limited to Ngai Tamanuhiri. In celiain circumstances descendants of Tamanuhiri could and did identify themselves as descendants of Rongowhakaata or Kahungunu. 8 In this repOli, Ngai Tamanuhiri includes Ngai Tahupo and all the other groups who claimed Tamanuhiri or one of his descendants as their eponymous ancestor. However, where the sources use Ngai Tahupo or some other hapu name, the repOli will use these names. In 1840, according to evidence given to the Poveliy Bay Commission in the late 1860s, and then in the Land Court in the 1870s and 1880s, those groups who traced descent from Tamanuhiri were located to the south of the Poverty Bay district, in the Muriwai district and along the coast to the south of Muriwai. Whareongaonga was a principal location. 188. This was Tawheo Pohatu's lineage, regarded as one of the principal Poverty Bay chiefs in the 1840s. For the origin of the name Ngai Tahupo see Gisborne MB, no 44, 4 November 1919, p 317 7 Poverty Bay Commission MB, 22 November 1873, p 41 S The reverse is also true. During the Maraetaha 2 hearing Wi Paetarewa said that he belonged to Ngati Hauaraki ofNgati Kahungunu. He began his whakapapa with Tamanuhiri. Gisborne MB no 8, 22 March 1882, p 17 2 1 ( 1 PavertyBay Nicks HeadlTe Kuri a Paaa Hawke Bay KEY: ---<:P- Main roads ~ Crown forests ~g Topography (in metres) 3 They also extended inland, into the district later defined as Maraetaha 2. There is some independent evidence, dating from the 1840s, as well. In the Turanga Journals William Williams noted that Taweo (sic), described as a principal Poverty Bay chief, was resident at Maraetaha in February 1840.9 Ngai Tamanuhiri were a coastal people. It is no accident that some of their key locations, for example, Kopututea, Te Kuri, Whareongaonga and Paritu, were all on the coast, or that they tended to defined their rohe as running from point to point along the Poverty Bay coastline.
Recommended publications
  • (Māori) Battalion
    Fact sheet 5: The formation of the 28th (Māori) Battalion When the decision was made in October 1939 to form a Māori military unit one suggestion was to call it the ‘Treaty of Waitangi’ battalion. It was felt that this would draw the attention of both Māori and Pākehā to their respective obligations under the Treaty. Article Three of the Treaty spoke of the rights and obligations of British subjects, something Āpirana Ngata saw as ‘the price of citizenship’. He believed that if Māori were to have a say in shaping the future of the nation after the war, they needed to participate fully during it. It was also a matter of pride. As Ngata asked, ‘how can we ever hold up our heads, when the struggle is over, to the question, “Where were you when New Zealand was at war?”’ Officially called the New Zealand 28th (Māori) Battalion, the unit was part of the 2nd New Zealand Division, the fighting arm of the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force (2NZEF). The NZ Division was made up of 15,000- 20,000 men, divided into three infantry brigades (the 4th, 5th and 6th Brigades) plus artillery, engineers, signals, medical and service units. Each brigade initially had three infantry battalions (numbered from 18th to 26th). The 28th (Māori) Battalion was at times attached to each of the Division's three brigades. Each battalion was commanded by a lieutenant-colonel. The Māori Battalion usually contained 700-750 men, divided into five companies. The Māori Battalion’s four rifle companies were organised on a tribal basis: • A Company was based on recruits from
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, October 14, 2020 Home-Delivered $1.90, Retail $2.20 Kaiti Hill Crawl for Cancer Page 2
    TE NUPEPA O TE TAIRAWHITI WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2020 HOME-DELIVERED $1.90, RETAIL $2.20 KAITI HILL CRAWL FOR CANCER PAGE 2 LOOKING BACK AT OUR ELECTORATE PAGE 5 ‘I’LL JUST GIVE YA A BIG FAT KISS’ WHERE THERE’S A WOOL, THERE’S A WEIGH: Gizzy Shrek goes to the “hairdresser” on Saturday morning at the Poverty Bay Spring Show and a special competition has been created for people to guess the weight of her fleece for cash prizes. Rob Faulkner is pictured with the woolly girl after she was found on Wairakaia Station last month. Gizzy Shrek is to be shorn with hand blades by legendary shearer Peter Casserly. STORY ON PAGE 3 Picture by Liam Clayton PAGE 14 by Andrew Ashton volumes remained flat year- that obtaining finance is not on-year in Gisborne, the an easy process and banks are GISBORNE house prices only region nationally not to taking up to four or five weeks last month hit an all-time increase from the same time for an appointment.” high median of $560,000 and last year. A total of 39 sales were realtors warn even higher However, listings increased completed last month — the RECORD prices are on the way if they 18.5 percent from the same same as September last year. cannot get more stock. time last year, with 64 new The top sale was $1 million Latest data from the Real properties listed in September. for 85 Hamilton Drive — a four- Estate Institute data shows “This is hopefully the first bedroom house in Sponge Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Inquiry District: an Overview of Crown-Maori Relations 1840-1986
    OFFICIAL Wai 900, A14 WAI 900 East Coast Inquiry District: An Overview of Crown- Maori Relations 1840-1986 A Scoping Report Commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal Wendy Hart November 2007 Contents Tables...................................................................................................................................................................5 Maps ....................................................................................................................................................................5 Images..................................................................................................................................................................5 Preface.................................................................................................................................................................6 The Author.......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................................ 6 Note regarding style........................................................................................................................................... 6 Abbreviations...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter One: Introduction ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Institute of Architects Is Gifted a Te Reo Māori Name
    Media release: 9 September 2019 New Zealand Institute of Architects is gifted a te reo Māori name The New Zealand Institute of Architects (NZIA) is proud to announce its gifted Māori name – Te Kāhui Whaihanga. NZIA president Tim Melville says the inclusion of a Māori name is an important moment in the history of the Institute, which was established in 1905 to represent New Zealand’s architects. “The Institute’s Māori name recognises the contribution of indigenous design practitioners, declares our commitment to the values of the Treaty of Waitangi and signals our desire to promote inclusivity in our profession.” “We are most appreciative of the gift of a name that offers a deeper level of meaning to our work as New Zealand architects,” Melville says. The name Te Kāhui Whaihanga was bestowed on the NZIA by the academic, broadcaster, writer and artist Dr Haare Williams MNZM (Te Aitanga-a-Māhaki, Rongowhakaata, Ngāi Tūhoe). Dr Williams says the te reo name combines Te Kāhui, a collective term for a group of people, and Whaihanga, which means to build or shape. “Te Kāhui Whaihanga is not a translation of the NZIA’s name,” Dr Williams says. “It’s an interpretation that advances an idea to another level. Te Kāhui Whaihanga is not only about architecture – it’s also about building a nation’s future and building a people.” The te reo name for the Institute of Architects is a further recognition of the evolving relationship between the Institute and Ngā Aho, the organisation representing Māori design professionals. The mutual commitment to that relationship is expressed in a kawenata or covenant signed by the NZIA and Ngā Aho two years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Maori History
    Documenting Maori History: THE ARREST OF TE KOOTI RIKIRANGI TE TURUKI, 1889* TRUTH is ever a casualty of war and of the aftermath of war and so it is of the conflicts between Maori and Pakeha in New Zealand. A bare hun- dred years is too short a time for both peoples, still somewhat uncertainly working out their relationships in New Zealand, to view the nineteenth- century conflicts with much objectivity. Indeed, partly due to the con- fidence and articulateness of the younger generations of Maoris and to their dissatisfaction with the Pakeha descriptions of what is and what happened, the covers have only in the last decade or so really begun to be ripped off the struggles of a century before. Some truth is emerging, in the sense of reasonably accurate statements about who did what and why, but so inevitably is a great deal of myth-making, of the casting of villains and the erection of culture-heroes by Maoris to match the villains and culture-heroes which were created earlier by the Pakeha—and which many Pakeha of a post-imperial generation now themselves find very inadequate. In all of this academics are going to become involved, partly because they are going to be dragged into it by the public, by their students and by the media, and partly because it is going to be difficult for some of them to resist the heady attractions of playing to the gallery of one set or another of protagonists or polemicists, frequently eager to have the presumed authority of an academic imprimatur on their particular ver- sion of what is supposed to have happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngā Ariki Kaipūtahi and the Mangatū Lands
    Wai 814, #P21 Wai 1489, #A22 Ngā Ariki Kaipūtahi and the Mangatū Lands 28 May 2018 Anthony Pātete A report commissioned by the Crown Forestry Rental Trust for the Waitangi Tribunal Mangatū Remedies district inquiry Ngā Ariki Kaipūtahi and the Mangatū Lands, May 2018 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary of the findings of the Mangatū Remedies Inquiry ................................................. 5 The identity of Ngā Ariki Kaipūtahi .......................................................................................... 6 Whakapapa ............................................................................................................................. 6 Protest ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Organisation ........................................................................................................................... 9 The rohe of Ngā Ariki Kaipūtahi ............................................................................................. 13 Customary interests of Ngā Ariki Kaipūtahi ........................................................................... 17 Comment on land block interests ......................................................................................... 20 Impact on Ngā Ariki Kaipūtahi...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, April 28, 2021 Home-Delivered $1.90, Retail $2.20 Tuhoe Protest: ‘It’S Confiscation All Over Again’ Page 3
    TE NUPEPA O TE TAIRAWHITI WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2021 HOME-DELIVERED $1.90, RETAIL $2.20 TUHOE PROTEST: ‘IT’S CONFISCATION ALL OVER AGAIN’ PAGE 3 TEAM COVID-19 PAGES 6-7, 12-13, 16 SPIRIT • Western Australia travel bubble reopened • Kiwis in India face more hurdles to get home Team Gisborne had every reason to smile after being named winners of the Team Spirit Award at the Halberg Games in Auckland • World rallies to help devastated India at the weekend. Back row (from left) are Team Gisborne members Oren Tibble and Tama Wirepa, team manager and Parafed • United States eases mask guidelines Gisborne-Tairawhiti regional development coordinator Lou Ellery and Raymond Braybrook. Front are Lezae Te Reo and former New Zealand Paralympics swimmer Rebecca Dubber, who presented the award. The Halberg Games is a three-day sports competition • British PM denies making open to athletes aged eight to 21 with a physical or visual impairment. Ms Ellery said anyone with a disability, of any age, was ‘bodies-piled-high’ comment welcome to join Parafed Gisborne-Tairawhiti via Facebook or by ringing her on 020 4080 9069. STORY ON PAGE 4 Picture supplied A GISBORNE woman’s of perjury had simply not He criticised her for plight through the court occurred, she said. confiding in three close friends system has been highlighted “(The woman) should have (those she called as witnesses) in national media reports as been free to leave her marriage. about the alleged abuse. a rare insight into existing She should have been able to The judge accused the concerns about the treatment secure a fair and reasonable woman as lying in an of women and children within matrimonial settlement and it “unreasonable pursuit” of more Family the Family Court system.
    [Show full text]
  • O Ngati Porou I SUE 41 HEPE EMA 011 NGAKOHINGA
    ISSUE 41 – HEPETEMA 2011 o Ngati Porou I SUE 41 HEPE EMA 011 NGAKOHINGA o Ngati Porou Cover: Naphanual Falwasser contemplates the Editorial winter wonderland at Ihungia. (Photo by Keith Baldwin) Tena tatou Ngati Porou. Tena tatou i o tatou mate huhua e whakangaro atu nei ki te po. Kei te tangi atu ki te pou o Te Ataarangi, ki a Kahurangi Dr Katerina Mataira me te tokomaha o ratou kua huri ki tua o te arai. Haere atu koutou. Tatou nga waihotanga iho o ratou ma, tena tatou. Change is certainly in the air. The days are getting warmer and longer. Certainly nothing like the cold snap a couple of Contents weeks ago that turned Ruatoria in to a “Winter Wonderland”. We are hoping the torrential rains which caused a flooded 1 Uawa Rugby Ruckus Kopuaroa river to wash out the bailey bridge at Makarika, 2-5 Te Ara o Kopu ki Uawa are also gone. Spring signals new life and new beginnings 6 Kopuaroa Bridge Washout and it, appropriately so, coincides with the inaugural elections for our new iwi authority, Te Runanganui o Ngati 8 “Ka rukuruku a Te Rangitawaea i ona Pueru e” Porou. In this issue we farewell a Dame and we meet a 10 Building a Bridge For Apopo Diplomat. Dame Dr Katerina Te Heikoko Mataira was a 12-13 Ngati Porou We Need Your Help! soldier of te reo Maori who lost her battle with cancer in July. 14-19 Radio Ngati Porou She is an inspiration for Ngati Porou women like the Deputy High Commissioner of South Africa, Georgina Roberts.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ RECALIBRATING THE MUSEUM: THE POLITICS OF STEWARDSHIP AND THE PHYSICAL/DIGITAL REPATRIATION OF TE HAU-KI-TURANGA A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY OF ART AND VISUAL STUDIES by Brinker Ferguson June 2018 The Dissertation of Brinker Ferguson is approved: _______________________________________ Professor Soraya Murray, chair _______________________________________ Professor Elisabeth Cameron _______________________________________ Professor Peter Probst _______________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Table of Contents List of figures…………..……………………………………………………………..iv Abstract……………………………………………………………………….......….vii Acknowledgements………...…………………………………………..…………......ix Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 1: Contemporary Issues Surrounding Te Hau-Ki-Turanga: Politics over Control and Cultural Memory.......................……………………………………...…15 Chapter 2: “Contact Zones” and the Entanglement of Rongowhakaata/Pakeha Influence in Te Hau-Ki-Turanga ……...…………………………………….………39 Chapter 3: A New Museology: Issues Related to Bicultural Contact Zones and Indigenous Agency at the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa……...….100 Chapter 4: Rongowhakaata and Cultural Development: New Models of Indigenous Agency Inside/Outside the Museum Institution….…………..……..….126 Chapter 5: Decolonizing National Museums: Expanding the Te Hau-Ki-Turanga Case Study to Other Indigenous Communities …………………………………….166
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Forestry Rental Trust Report to Appointors 2007 – 2008
    CROWN FORESTRY RENTAL TRUST REPORT TO APPOINTORS 2007 – 2008 Crown Forestry rental trust trustees sir Graham latimer MS Janet mason mr GreGory Fortuin mr paul morGan ms anGela Foulkes mr kinGi smiler The Trust has a fundamental duty to prov ide funding and support to claimants. It is an obligation that w e regard as an integral ingredient in settling Treaty claims. Cover image: © mychillybin.co.nz/Brent Carville Contents 2 | Message from the Chair 6 | Message from the Chief executive 12 | Income statement 12 | Statement of Changes in equity – retained earnings 13 | Balance sheet 14 | Statement of Cash Flows 15 | Notes to the Financial statements 41 | Auditor’s report 43 | Map of Crown Forest licensed land 45 | Directory The Trust has a fundamental duty to prov ide funding and support to claimants. It is an obligation that w e regard as an integral ingredient in settling Treaty claims. Message from the Chair Kia hiwa ra, kia kiwa ra. We are pleased to present the Annual Report of Crown Forest Rental Trust to our Appointors: the New Zealand Maori Council, the Federation of Maori Author­ ities, and the Minister of Finance. This Report covers the financial statements and activities of Crown Forestry Rental Trust (‘the Trust’) for the period 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008. Over the last 12 months the Trust has worked very hard to meet the expectations of the claimant community. It has taken a robust approach in balancing the needs of the claimant community with the powers granted to the Trust under the Trust Deed.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Tūranganui-A-Kiwa / Poverty Bay [Alteration from Poverty Bay]
    Proposal for Tūranganui-a-Kiwa / Poverty Bay [alteration from Poverty Bay] Image provided by proposer Inset NZTopo250 mosaic Crown copyright reserved Summary Gisborne District Council (GDC) proposes altering the existing recorded name, Poverty Bay, for the bay south of Gisborne (town), to a dual name Tūranganui-a-Kiwa / Poverty Bay. In 1769 Lieutenant James Cook named the feature Poverty Bay because he was unable to resupply at the bay1. There are several kōrero for Tūranganui-a-Kiwa relating to Kiwa of the Horouta or Tākitimu waka. A commonly cited meaning is ‘the great [or long] standing place of Kiwa’. GDC’s reasons for the proposal include: - restoring an original Māori name, - a dual name being representative of the area’s bicultural heritage, - support for te reo Māori, - possible economic and tourism benefits, - some evidence of community support for a dual name, - a name change fostering positive cultural and social outcomes. GDC consulted with Tūranga iwi: Ngai Tāmanuhiri, Rongowhakaata, and Te Aitanga a Māhaki, who it identified as mana whenua. Letters of support are included, although they each support only the original Māori name, not a 1 J A Mackay (1949), Historic Poverty Bay and the East Coast, North Island, New Zealand, Gisborne, Chapter V – the Unhappy Naming of Povery Bay. – accessed 20 March 2018 NZGB meeting 12 April 2018 Page 1 of 11 Linzone ID: A3204829 dual name. The Secretariat requested Te Puni Kōkiri to confirm consultation requirements with any other iwi/hapū. GDC also publicly consulted for two weeks during January-February 2018. The proposal includes the responses and a summary of the results.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government on the East Coast
    Local Government on the East Coast August 2009 Jane Luiten A Report Commissioned by HistoryWorks for the Crown Forestry Rental Trust 1 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................ 5 Local Government.................................................................................................................. 5 Project Brief ........................................................................................................................... 7 Statements of Claim ............................................................................................................... 9 The Author ........................................................................................................................... 11 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 13 Part One: The Historical Development of Local Government................................................. 27 1. Local Government in the Colonial Context: 1840-1876................................................... 28 1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 28 1.2 Local Government in the Crown Colony, 1840-1852.............................................. 29 1.3 Constitution Act 1852 .............................................................................................. 35 1.4 Financing
    [Show full text]