DOCSLIB.ORG

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 24, 2015 Tracking No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 24, 2015 Tracking No As of: November 30, 2015 Received: November 24, 2015 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 24, 2015 Tracking No. 1jz-8mfr-dxdj Comments Due: January 25, 2016 Submission Type: Web Docket: USCIS-2006-0068 Agency Information Collection Activities:Form I–9, Employment Eligibility Verification Comment On: USCIS-2006-0068-0246 Agency Information Collection Activities: Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Document: USCIS-2006-0068-0251 Comment Submitted by Jim O'Neil Submitter Information Name: Jim O'Neil Address: 110 Cedar Works Row Richmond, VA, 23231 Email: [email protected] Phone: 4042772592 General Comment No doubt it is just me...but i cant find anything that actually speaks to the revision. A little clarity would be nice. file:///O|/Policy/2016%20I-9%20PRA/Reconciliation%20Reports%20-%20RCD/USCIS-2006-0068-0251.html[3/9/2016 2:21:01 PM] As of: November 30, 2015 Received: November 24, 2015 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 24, 2015 Tracking No. 1jz-8mfw-z2py Comments Due: January 25, 2016 Submission Type: Web Docket: USCIS-2006-0068 Agency Information Collection Activities:Form I–9, Employment Eligibility Verification Comment On: USCIS-2006-0068-0246 Agency Information Collection Activities: Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Document: USCIS-2006-0068-0252 Comment Submitted by Anonymous Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous Address: United States, Email: [email protected] General Comment I really like the new revised form because it clarified a lot of ambiguities that were still present in the last revision. One concern that I have been trying to get addressed almost since the 2013 version was released was the vagueness with the directions for the "Other Names Used" field, and the change to "Other Last Names Used" solved that. Being an activist for their community my principal concern is for transgender people, and the way the 2013 instructions were written could be interpreted to require employees who have had a sex change to "out" themselves to their employer by being required to provide a first name associated with their gender at birth. By clarifying that the field's intent is for former last names (e.g. maiden, previous married, etc.) that issue will be rendered moot. Based on the size of the field, the way E-Verify is set up, and that the 2012-13 change appeared to be driven largely by women who objected to the term "maiden name" (based on the comments when this was open in 2012), I figured the field's intent was to apply to other last names the employee used - but since that was not clear, and given the concerns with transgender people about protecting their privacy regarding their gender transition due to rampant discrimination by employers and others against them, I felt that it needed to be addressed. The proposed form does that. By the way, you have a typo in the Table of Changes that does not appear on the other new documents - "changed your 'first' name from Smith to Jones" should be "changed your 'last' name from Smith to Jones" (but that is a minor concern as the form and instructions themselves are correct). file:///O|/Policy/2016%20I-9%20PRA/Reconciliation%20Reports%20-%20RCD/USCIS-2006-0068-0252.html[3/9/2016 2:21:01 PM] As of: November 30, 2015 Received: November 24, 2015 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 27, 2015 Tracking No. 1jz-8mfy-dtrf Comments Due: January 25, 2016 Submission Type: Web Docket: USCIS-2006-0068 Agency Information Collection Activities:Form I–9, Employment Eligibility Verification Comment On: USCIS-2006-0068-0246 Agency Information Collection Activities: Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Document: USCIS-2006-0068-0253 Comment Submitted by Lorena Rivas Submitter Information Name: Lorena Rivas Address: 2400 S Avenue A Yuma, 85364 Email: [email protected] Phone: 928336112 Fax: 9283367677 General Comment Remove email or add to very last of employee section. Not everybody likes to provide their email or they do not have one. Make the boxes slight larger for entering DOB and SS#. file:///O|/Policy/2016%20I-9%20PRA/Reconciliation%20Reports%20-%20RCD/USCIS-2006-0068-0253.html[3/9/2016 2:21:01 PM] As of: November 30, 2015 Received: November 25, 2015 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 27, 2015 Tracking No. 1jz-8mgp-7h3x Comments Due: January 25, 2016 Submission Type: Web Docket: USCIS-2006-0068 Agency Information Collection Activities:Form I–9, Employment Eligibility Verification Comment On: USCIS-2006-0068-0246 Agency Information Collection Activities: Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Document: USCIS-2006-0068-0254 Comment Submitted by Raymond Lutz Submitter Information Name: Raymond Lutz Address: 1010 Old Chase Ave. El Cajon, 92020 Email: [email protected] Phone: 6198205321 General Comment Thank you for making this form SHORTER and moving the instructions to a separate document. There are usually only a few fields that are actually entered. These should be included on a single page, rather than spreading it to two pages to make the number of pages that need to be printed to only ONE most of the time. file:///O|/Policy/2016%20I-9%20PRA/Reconciliation%20Reports%20-%20RCD/USCIS-2006-0068-0254.html[3/9/2016 2:21:02 PM] As of: November 30, 2015 Received: November 25, 2015 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 27, 2015 Tracking No. 1jz-8mgm-8222 Comments Due: January 25, 2016 Submission Type: Web Docket: USCIS-2006-0068 Agency Information Collection Activities:Form I–9, Employment Eligibility Verification Comment On: USCIS-2006-0068-0246 Agency Information Collection Activities: Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Document: USCIS-2006-0068-0255 Comment Submitted by Cathy Underwood Submitter Information Name: Cathy Underwood Address: 10073 Valley View St #280 Cypress, CA, 90630 Email: [email protected] Phone: 714-243-4104 x151 Fax: 800-861-3799 General Comment Is there anyway you can add a notary public field so that when an employee is hired remotely that the I-9 can be completed by a notary public. or is there another solution. We hire in 32 states but only have 1 location. Usually only 1 or 2 people in many of the states, so it is not prudent to get an office. Is there a solution that I am unaware of. We just started using I-9 Advantage and it is still confusing to new candidates. Thank you file:///O|/Policy/2016%20I-9%20PRA/Reconciliation%20Reports%20-%20RCD/USCIS-2006-0068-0255.html[3/9/2016 2:21:03 PM] As of: November 30, 2015 Received: November 25, 2015 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 27, 2015 Tracking No. 1jz-8mgl-vruu Comments Due: January 25, 2016 Submission Type: Web Docket: USCIS-2006-0068 Agency Information Collection Activities:Form I–9, Employment Eligibility Verification Comment On: USCIS-2006-0068-0246 Agency Information Collection Activities: Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Document: USCIS-2006-0068-0256 Comment Submitted by Michel Desormeaux Submitter Information Name: michel desormeaux Address: 100-50 St west po bxo 5875 stn main fort mc murray Alberta Canada Bradenton, FL, 34209 Email: [email protected] Phone: 941-747-3236-canada: 780-742-1033 General Comment Hi I don t understand y with all the paper work I sent the corporation trying to hire me doing it and still nothing I don t have criminal record not even a speeding infraction good bank account and your neighbor from Canada I live here at lease 6 months of the year for the last 40 years .You need to do some home work, I understand the way things are today you have to be careful about it do I need to beach my self in Miami ? thanks for your time I appreciate . sincerely yours .Michel Desormeaux file:///O|/Policy/2016%20I-9%20PRA/Reconciliation%20Reports%20-%20RCD/USCIS-2006-0068-0256.html[3/9/2016 2:21:03 PM] As of: November 30, 2015 Received: November 25, 2015 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 27, 2015 Tracking No. 1jz-8mgl-1yuh Comments Due: January 25, 2016 Submission Type: Web Docket: USCIS-2006-0068 Agency Information Collection Activities:Form I–9, Employment Eligibility Verification Comment On: USCIS-2006-0068-0246 Agency Information Collection Activities: Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Document: USCIS-2006-0068-0257 Comment Submitted by Anastacia Glinsmann Submitter Information Name: Anastacia Glinsmann General Comment I feel like the form should be simplified back to how it was prior to 06-30-2008. A one page document makes more sense and wastes less paper. With the increase in E-Verify, shouldn't there be a small section that asks if you did an E-Verify case and then have you write the confirmation number? This will alleviate a lot of the extra write-ins on the top of the page/in margins. Also, the Other Names Used box is very confusing people who use nicknames. If you didn't want to use Maiden Name, you could use Birth Name (If different from Family Name). file:///O|/Policy/2016%20I-9%20PRA/Reconciliation%20Reports%20-%20RCD/USCIS-2006-0068-0257.html[3/9/2016 2:21:02 PM] As of: November 30, 2015 Received: November 25, 2015 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 27, 2015 Tracking No. 1jz-8mgk-mehj Comments Due: January 25, 2016 Submission Type: Web Docket: USCIS-2006-0068 Agency Information Collection Activities:Form I–9, Employment Eligibility Verification Comment On: USCIS-2006-0068-0246 Agency Information Collection Activities: Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Document: USCIS-2006-0068-0258 Comment Submitted by Naomi Franceschini Submitter Information Name: Naomi Franceschini Address: 26 Alberigi Drive Jessup, PA, 18434 Email: [email protected] Phone: 57038332261633 General Comment Please make the form back to one single page, with the list of acceptable documents easy to indicate to new hires what is needed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Out of Local News: Implications for an Informed Public
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons School of Communication: Faculty Publications and Other Works Faculty Publications 9-2013 Taking the ‘Local’ out of Local News: Implications for an Informed Public Lee Hood Loyola University Chicago, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/communication_facpubs Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Hood, L. "Taking the ‘Local’ out of Local News: Implications for an Informed Public." Journalism and Mass Communication 3(9), 2013. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Communication: Faculty Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. © David Publishing, 2013. Journalism and Mass Communication, ISSN 2160-6579 September 2013, Vol. 3, No. 9, 549-562 D DAVID PUBLISHING Taking the “Local” out of Local News: Implications for an Informed Public Lee Hood Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, USA The meaning of “local” in TV news is not as straightforward as one might imagine. “Local” newscasts in several U.S. markets are outsourced to an independent company located hundreds of miles from the communities served. What are the implications of such a delivery system for coverage of local issues and the Jeffersonian ideal of an informed citizenry? This study employs a content analysis of outsourced and local newscasts, using a data set of more than 1,000 stories from more than 30 hours of newscasts to determine if differences exist on story topics and source types.
    [Show full text]
  • Morpheus V4.0 Playout Automation Introduction
    Innovation in the Multi-Screen World Morpheus V4.0 Playout Automation Introduction In today’s media and broadcast industry The company’s fl agship broadcast From its core database engine through one of the big challenges centers on automation solution, Morpheus, is a fi t to every device, Morpheus is designed for content delivery in a landscape where for purpose, scalable, multi-channel and resilience and, where required, redundancy, consumer behaviour and service demands multi-screen playout automation solution ensuring the right content and its metadata are changing rapidly. that is appropriate for the widest range of will be in the right place at the right time. applications including: With over four decades of leading edge Snell has the knowledge and experience development experience Snell delivers the National Broadcasters to develop an automation solution that is most fl exible and powerful broadcast Network Origination fi t for your purpose, irrespective of the size automation solutions on the market today. Centralcasting and scale of your enterprise, the range of From simple server playout to highly Business Continuity content distribution platforms integrated complex channels, the company’s key within your business model and your plans enabling technologies provide an extensive Based on format and device independent for future growth and expansion. suite of enterprise-wide media workfl ow platforms, Snell offers a range of robust and solutions for the effortless management resilient content distribution mechanisms, Taking an agnostic approach to formats of content. which keep pace with new devices as they and platforms means that Snell empowers evolve to meet the demands of future its customers to extract every drop of value The essence of Snell’s playout automation services, delivery platforms and consumer from their investments, while their builds on the principles of utmost appetite.
    [Show full text]
  • Voice of the Broadcasting Industry Volume 22, Issue 12
    December 2005 Voice of the Broadcasting Industry Volume 22, Issue 12 $8.00 USA $12.50 Canada-Foreign RADIORADIO NEWS ® NEWS Froogle shopping site, found a grand total of three possibilities—two Hurry 2006, we can’t wait! actually, since two were for the same Panasonic in-dash car receiver. It From listening to the Q3 Wall Street conference calls, it seems to did not have multicasting and was offered by a total of 56 merchants us that many broadcasters would be happy to have 2006 begin for prices ranging from $308 to $500. The other listing was for the right away and not have to deal with Q4 of 2005. Pretty much Boston Acoustics Receptor Radio, a table model which does have HD everyone complained that the national spot market is soft, so multicasting—at least, it will once the manufacturer actually begins they all touted how great their stations are doing on pushing shipping them. J&R Music is taking reservations at $499. Although it local sales. Even the normally red-hot Spanish broadcasting sec- didn’t come up on Froogle, Crutchfield is also taking reservations for tor is singing the blues, projecting single digit revenue gains rather the same model, although it is charging 99 cents more. We actually than double digits. But then, many of their general market breth- had better luck on eBay, where quite a few people were offering ren would be happy to see any positive number. various Kenwood and Panasonic in-dash models. Of course, the lack of political dollars hit TV stations hard in the By the way, a Froogle search for XM radios produced over second half of 2005, so everyone is salivating over their expected 14,000 hits and a search for Sirius radios brought over 11,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Jews in the Media: an Analysis of Old Hollywood Stereotypes Perpetuated in Modern Television Minnah Marguerite Stein
    )ORULGD6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\/LEUDULHV 2021 Representation of Jews in the Media: An Analysis of Old Hollywood Stereotypes Perpetuated in Modern Television Minnah Marguerite Stein Follow this and additional works at DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS REPRESENTATION OF JEWS IN THE MEDIA: AN ANALYSIS OF OLD HOLLYWOOD STEREOTYPES PERPETUATED IN MODERN TELEVISION By MINNAH STEIN A Thesis submitted to the Department of Communications and Media Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Summer, 2021 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of Minnah Stein defended on April 2, 2021. Dr. Andrew Opel Thesis Director Dr. Martin Kavka Outside Committee Member Dr. Arienne Ferchaud Committee Member 2 Abstract Anti-Semitism in the United States is just as prevalent today as it has ever been. How does this cultural anti-Semitism translate into the media? Through portraying Jews as greedy, neurotic, pushy, money obsessed, cheap, and a myriad other negative stereotypes, the media often perpetuates long standing anti-Semitic tropes. This thesis analyzes the prevalence of Jewish stereotypes in modern television through the analysis and discussion of three of the most popular current television shows, getting into the nuance and complexity of Jewish representation. Through the deliberate viewing of Big Mouth, The Goldbergs, and Schitt’s Creek, the conclusion is that although an effort is being made to debunk some stereotypes about Jews, there are other Jewish stereotypes that have remained popular in television media. These stereotypes are harmful to Jews because they both feed and fuel the anti-Semitic attitudes of viewers.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Seeks Comment on STELA DTV Signal Strength Prediction and Measurement Procedures
    August 9, 2010 FCC Seeks Comment on STELA DTV Signal Strength Prediction and Measurement Procedures On July 28, 2010 the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking which seeks comment on a prediction model and on-site measurement procedure for determining the strength of a DTV signal at any specific location. These would be used to determine whether a household could be considered “unserved” by a local network affiliated DTV station and thus would be eligible to receive a distant DTV network affiliated signal retransmitted by DTH satellite carriers (e.g DirecTV or Dish Network). The Commission is taking this action as a consequence of the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010 (STELA) which was enacted by Congress in February, 2010. The STELA requires the FCC, within 270 days enactment, to: 1) “…develop and prescribe by rule a point-to-point predictive model for reliably and presumptively determining the ability of individual locations, through the use of an antenna, to receive signals in accordance with the signal intensity standard in Section 73.622(e)(1) of the rules…” and 2) Issue an order completing its rulemaking to establish a procedure for on-site measurement of digital television signals in ET Docket No. 06-94 (See TV TechCheck from May 17, 2006) In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) portion of this action the FCC proposes to prescribe a point-to-point predictive model (referred to as ILLR - Individual Location Longley-Rice) for determining the ability of individual locations to receive an over-the-air digital television broadcast signal at the intensity level needed for service through the use of an antenna, as required by the STELA.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum Servers & Crispin Automation
    Purchasing Division State of West Virginia 2019 Washington Street East Solicitation Response Post Office Box 50130 Charleston, WV 25305-0130 Proc Folder : 433008 Solicitation Description : AUTOMATION SWITCHER FOR MASTER CONTROL Proc Type : Central Purchase Order Date issued Solicitation Closes Solicitation Response Version 2018-04-11 SR 0439 ESR04021800000004489 1 13:30:00 VENDOR VS0000014891 Crispin Crispin Solicitation Number: CRFQ 0439 EBA1800000009 Total Bid : $224,971.75 Response Date: 2018-04-06 Response Time: 11:39:44 Comments: Thank you for reviewing the Crispin and Harmonic proposal for West Virginia PBS. Crispin is providing a proposal for Crispin automation with Harmonic video servers. Crispin will be the reseller for the Harmonic servers. We have included a proposal, drawing, compliance matrix and 5 supplemental documents with this proposal. Please see the compliance matrix for a line-by-line response of all mandatory items. When reviewing all proposals, please see total cost of ownership over 4 years. Crispin provides 4 years of support AND 4 years of hardware warranty on the Crispin system. We hope to do business with WVPBS soon. Thank you, Jill Hopkins Account Manager Crispin Corporation FOR INFORMATION CONTACT THE BUYER Michelle L Childers (304) 558-2063 [email protected] Signature on File FEIN # DATE All offers subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation Page : 1 FORM ID : WV-PRC-SR-001 Line Comm Ln Desc Qty Unit Issue Unit Price Ln Total Or Contract Amount 1 MASTER CONTROL AUTOMATION 1.00000 EA $224,971.750000 $224,971.75 & PLAYOUT SERVER Comm Code Manufacturer Specification Model # 32150000 Extended Description : All inclusive price for Master Control Automation & Playout Server including training and commissioning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ruderman White Paper on the Challenge to Create More Authentic Disability Casting and Representation on Tv
    THE RUDERMAN WHITE PAPER ON THE CHALLENGE TO CREATE MORE AUTHENTIC DISABILITY CASTING AND REPRESENTATION ON TV Tari Hartman Squire Kristina Kopić Daryl “Chill” Mitchell September 2017 Deadline White Paper – Disability Television – Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS: Executive Summary _______________________________________________________________________________ 1 Sections: Foreword by Daryl “Chill” Mitchell _______________________________________________________3 Section One: Introduction ________________________________________________________________ 5 Section Two: Methodology ______________________________________________________________ 10 Section Three: Data Analysis ____________________________________________________________14 Section Four: Proactive Initiatives and Emerging Trends Moving Forward _________31 Section Five: Resources___________________________________________________________________35 THE RUDERMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION One of our goals at the Ruderman Family Foundation is to change the public’s awareness of people with disabilities. More specifically, we make the argument that full inclusion of people with disabilities is not a matter of charity, but of civil rights. We researched this White Paper in order to further the awareness around this civil rights movement. We believe that the results we found will meaningfully contribute to the conversation of diversity in entertainment as a civil rights issue that needs to be addressed more systematically by the media and entertainment industry. Our Mission Deadline The Ruderman Family
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 CPB Local Content and Service Report
    2011 LOCAL CONTENT AND SERVICE REPORT TO “What WCNY intends to do here is going to further our region’s reputation as a real innovator .” THE -Joanie Mahoney COMMUNITY Onondaga County Executive WCNY is the public voice of Central New York. It connects and gives back to the community that supports it. LOCAL 2011 KEY LOCAL VALUE SERVICES IMPACT WCNY delivered more than 210 Founded in 1965, WCNY is a WCNY educates, entertains and hours of diverse, local dual licensee broadcasting inspires with programming that programming in 2011. station that serves a 19- encourages appreciation for our Public Affairs shows (Ivory county viewing and listening diversity and shared humanity. Tower, Central Issues, Focus: area, reaching more than 1.8 Our vision is to be the hub that Well Being, Financial Fitness) million households via on-air, connects Central New York to were complimented by radio and online content. education, the arts, and public documentaries of regional WCNY broadcasts television affairs. We seek to distinguish relevance (Voices from the programming on 24.1 in ourselves nationally as an Back of the Bus, Inside the Syracuse, WCNY2, and innovator in programming, Nursing Crisis, Women Who digital channels 24.2-YTV, onsite educational services, and Conquer War). WCNY teamed Cinema 24.3-World and 24.4- cost-sharing. We utilize regional with NYNET to prep students HD. All channels are carried partnerships and opportunities for state exams with Regents by 33 cable carriers, for advanced technologies. Review, an educational including Time Warner. WCNY works to be an compliment to our student quiz WCNY is the only station in indispensable community show, Double Down.
    [Show full text]
  • Video Production(207) Unit -1
    VIDEO PRODUCTION(207) UNIT -1 Introduction to Video Production Video production is the process of creating video by capturing moving images (videography), and creating combinations and reductions of parts of this video in live production and post- production (video editing). In most cases the captured video will be recorded on electronic media such as video tape, hard disk, or solid state storage, but it might only be distributed electronically without being recorded. It is the equivalent of filmmaking, but with images recorded electronically instead of film stock. Practically, video production is the art and service of creating content and delivering a finished video product. This can include production of television programs, television commercials, corporate videos, event videos, wedding videos and special-interest home videos. A video production can range in size from a family making home movies with a prosumer camcorder, a one solo camera operator with a professional video camera in a single-camera setup (aka a "one- man band"), a videographer with a sound person, to a multiple-camera setup shoot in a television studio to a production truck requiring a whole television crew for an electronic field production (EFP) with a production company with set construction on the backlot of a movie studio. Styles of shooting include on a tripod (aka "sticks")[1] for a locked-down shot; hand-held to attain a more jittery camera angle or looser shot, incorporating Dutch angle, Whip pan and whip zoom; on a jib that smoothly soars to varying heights; and with a Steadicam for smooth movement as the camera operator incorporates cinematic techniques moving through rooms, as seen in The Shining.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Between National
    AGREEMENT BETWEEN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCAST EMPLOYEES AND TECHNICIANS - COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO AND WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION 2005 - 2008 Table of Contents t\.RTICLE 1.•••..•.•.••....•...•.••.•••••.•.••••.••....•••.••••• ~(;()(;.l'lITI()~ ~ W~T'\7 1 ARTICLE II .•..•.•.••....•......•.••• EQUAL OPPORTU1'lITY AND NO DISCRIMINATION 1 ARTICLE III .......•............................................•.•.......•.............. EMPLOYMENT 2 ARTICLE IV •.••...•...•.•....•.•.••••..•••.••..•....•.••....•.•...••••••.•••...••••••.•••.•. CHECK-OFF 7 ARTICLE V ..••••••••••...•........•••.•.•.......•....•.•...•..••••••••..•••.••.••• WORK SCHEDULES 8 ARTICLE VI ..•.•.•••.•.••...••.•.•••.•.•..••••.•........•.•.•••.••••.•••.•.••••.•••.•• MEAL PERIODS 13 ARTICLE VII .••...•.•...•.•.•.•.••••.••••••....••.....• CLASSIFICATION AND WAGE SCALE 15 ARTICLE VIII ••.....•...•.•...••••••••.••...••.•.•••••••••••••.•..•..•.•.•......•.••.•••.•.•• OVERTIME 19 ARTIC;LE I~ ............................................................. ~A1'AR'\7 C()NTll'JlJi\Tl()l'J 19 ARTICLE X .•...•...•.•...........••.•.•.•....•..•.....•...•.•.•.•..•......•..••...•....•.•.•• VA CATIONS 22 ARTICLE XI .••....•.•.......•.•.•......•••.....••.••.•.•..••••.•.....•.•.•.•.•....••..•.•.••.• HOLIDAYS 25 ARTICLE XII .....•..•..••..•.....•.•.•..•..••..••....•..•.••.•.••.•.•••..•.•.•.....••••••.•..•• BENEFITS 26 ARTICLE XIII .•........•........•..•.•.•.......•.........•.•......•.•..•.• MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 29 ARTICLE XIV ••...•........•..•..••••...••..•......•.......•.•....•..•.•.•.•.•...•..•••.
    [Show full text]
  • The Watchdog Role of Newspapers: Newspaper Coverage of Sinclair Broadcasting's Announcement to Air a One-Sided Documentary Right Before the 2004 Presidential Election
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Theses Theses and Dissertations 12-2009 The watchdog role of newspapers: Newspaper coverage of Sinclair Broadcasting's announcement to air a one-sided documentary right before the 2004 presidential election. Greta Kaye Weiderman Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses Recommended Citation Weiderman, Greta Kaye, "The aw tchdog role of newspapers: Newspaper coverage of Sinclair Broadcasting's announcement to air a one-sided documentary right before the 2004 presidential election." (2009). Theses. Paper 82. This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE WATCHDOG ROLE OF NEWSPAPERS: NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF SINCLAIR BROADCASTING'S ANNOUNCEMENT TO AIR A ONE-SIDED DOCUMENTARY RIGHT BEFORE THE 2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. by Greta K. Weiderman B.S., Bowling Green State University, 2002 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Master of Arts College of Mass Communication and Media Arts in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale December 2009 THESIS APPROVAL THE WATCHDOG ROLE OF NEWSPAPERS: NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF SINCLAIR BROADCASTING'S ANNOUNCEMENT TO AIR A ONE-SIDED DOCUMENTARY RIGHT BEFORE THE 2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. By Greta K. Weiderman A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the field of Mass Communication and Media Arts Approved by: William A. Babcock, Chair William H.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast & Media Technology Industry Guide
    Broadcast & Media Technology Industry Guide an IABM Sourcebook 2009 The IABM Sourcebook 2009 Broadcast & Media Technology Industry Guide an IABM Sourcebook 2009 IABM Secretariat Team: The Global Media Alliance (GMA): Price: US$145 / €110 / £95 Chief Executive Officer: Roger Stanwell Publisher: Nicholas Hunter Barr Published by: The Global Media Alliance Non Executive Director: Roger Crumpton Account Manager: Cary Creed Operations Manager: Cindy Horwood Design & Pemberton Design Project Manager: Andrew Morgan pembertondesign.co.uk Financial Controller: Lucinda Meek Production Research Director: Kathryn Hall 020 8398 3962 Membership Administrator: Elaine Bukiej Technical Consultant: Max Alexander Marketing & Project Printed in the UK: Thanet Press Coordinator: Megan Haywood Credit Control: Amanda Shepard Website Administrator: Jamie Goodenough Subscriptions: Steven Roberts PO Box 2264 The Studios, 1 Portsmouth Road The publishers would like to thank the sponsors, Reading, Berkshire, UK Thames Ditton, Surrey KT7 0SY, UK contributors, the IABM and all those who have Tel: +44 (0)118 941 8620 assisted in compiling information for this publication. Tel: +44 (0)20 8339 0081 Fax: +44 (0)118 941 8630 Fax: +44 (0)20 8181 6459 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-9552420-4-5 www.theiabm.org www.thegma.eu © The GMA infringement and to the Copyright and Rights in Database Regulation 1997 in relation to copyright and database rights infringement. This work has been compiled as a work of reference, and is published and supplied for such purpose. It is a condition of sale of this publication that it may not be used or reproduced in part or in its entirety to compile or If you are in any doubt as to the manner in which this publication may be used whether in the course of business store lists, other directories or mailing lists without the prior written permission of the publisher (The Global Media or otherwise please contact the publisher for advice and guidance.
    [Show full text]