Lower Miocene) in the Bern Area, Switzerland
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. -
Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................ -
Axiidea and Brachyura (Decapoda) from the Pliocene–Pleistocene Ananai Formation, Shikoku, Japan
Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, no. 39 (2013), p. 51–54, 2 figs. 51 © 2013, Mizunami Fossil Museum Axiidea and Brachyura (Decapoda) from the Pliocene–Pleistocene Ananai Formation, Shikoku, Japan Hiroaki Karasawa1 and Yoshitaka Kinugawa2 1Mizunami Fossil Museum, Yamanouchi, Akeyo, Mizunami, Gifu 509-6132, Japan <[email protected]> 2 Kaminotani7-3-3, Suma-ku, Kobe City, 654-0162, Japan Abstract Four species of decapods are reported from the Ananai Formation of the Pliocene–Pleistocene Tonohama Group in Aki City, Kochi Prefecture, Shikoku, Japan. Ctenocheles sp. (Axiidea: Ctenochelidae), Anatolikos japonicus (Ortmann) (Brachyura: Cancridae), and two species of Charybdis (Brachyura: Portunidae) are included. Charybdis (Charybdis) kinugawai Karasawa, a new portunid is described. Key words: Decapoda, Axiidea, Brachyura, Ananai Formation, Pliocene–Pleistocene, Japan Introduction Systematics (By Karasawa) The Pliocene–Pleistocene Tonohama Group is distributed in the western part of the Muroto Peninsula, Kochi Prefecture, Shikoku. This Infraorder Axiidea de Saint Laurent, 1979 group consists of the Nobori, Ananai, and Ropponmatsu Formations in Superfamily Callianassoidea Dana, 1852 ascending order (Katto and Masuda, 1993; Iwai et al., 2006). Matsubara Family Ctenochelidae Manning and Felder, 1991 (2004) reviewed the geologic age of the Tonohama Group based Subfamily Ctenochelinae Manning and Felder, 1991 upon the previously known microfossils. He showed that the Nobori Genus Ctenocheles Kishinouye, 1926 Formation was assigned to the late early Pliocene–early late Pliocene (4.20–3.21 or 3.12 Ma; Berggren et al., 1995) and that the geological Ctenocheles sp. age of the Ananai Formation was the late Pliocene (2.78 or 2.73–1.97 (Fig. 1.1, 1.2) Ma) (=late Pliocene–early Pleistocene based upon Cohen and Gibbard, Material examined: Incomplete propodi of 1 st pereiopod, 2011). -
Open Ocean Intake Effects Study
City of Santa Cruz Water Department & Soquel Creek Water District scwd2 Desalination Program Open Ocean Intake Effects Study December 2010 Submitted to: Ms. Heidi Luckenbach City of Santa Cruz 212 Locust Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Prepared by: Environmental ESLO2010-017.1 [Blank Page] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Tenera Environmental wishes to acknowledge the valuable contributions of the Santa Cruz Water Department, Soquel Creek Water District, and scwd² Task Force in conducting the Open Ocean Intake Effects Study. Specifically, Tenera would like to acknowledge the efforts of: City of Santa Cruz Water Department Soquel Creek Water District Bill Kocher, Director Laura Brown, General Manager Linette Almond, Engineering Manager Melanie Mow Schumacher, Public Information Heidi R. Luckenbach, Program Coordinator Coordinator Leah Van Der Maaten, Associate Engineer Catherine Borrowman, Professional and Technical scwd² Task Force Assistant Ryan Coonerty Todd Reynolds, Kennedy/Jenks and scwd² Bruce Daniels Technical Advisor Bruce Jaffe Dan Kriege Thomas LaHue Don Lane Cynthia Mathews Mike Rotkin Ed Porter Tenera’s project team included the following members: David L. Mayer, Ph.D., Tenera Environmental President and Principal Scientist John Steinbeck, Tenera Environmental Vice President and Principal Scientist Carol Raifsnider, Tenera Environmental Director of Operations and Principal Scientist Technical review and advice was provided by: Pete Raimondi, Ph.D., UCSC, Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology in the Earth and Marine Sciences Dept. Gregor -
Harbor Seal Species Profile Encyclopedia of Puget Sound June 9, 2014
(Photograph by G. E. Davis) Harbor seal species profile Encyclopedia of Puget Sound June 9, 2014 Jacqlynn C. Zier and Joseph K. Gaydos* SeaDoc Society / UC Davis’ Karen C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center Orcas Island Office 942 Deer Harbor Road, Eastsound, WA 98245 *Corresponding author [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Distribution .............................................................................................................. 3 Global .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Local ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1 Populations .............................................................................................................. 4 Genetic diversity ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Population size ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Longevity and survival .......................................................................................................................................... -
Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)
Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 .................................. -
Swinomish Crab Abundance Monitoring Program: Light Trap
SWINOMISH CRAB ABUNDANCE MONITORING PROGRAM LIGHT TRAP METHODS Claire E. Cook, Sarah K. Grossman, and Julie S. Barber A Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Contribution SWIN-CR-2018-02 Original Publish Date: December 2018 Updated: February 2020 La Conner, WA 98257 0 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Design and construction ............................................................................................................................ 5 Deployment ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Sample retrieval ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Sample processing .................................................................................................................................... 6 Subsampling .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Citizen scientist monitoring program ........................................................................................................ 7 Step-by-step construction ............................................................................................................................. -
Re-Evaluation of the Cancridae Latreille, 1802 (Decapoda: Brachyura) Including Three New Genera and Three New Species 4 Carrie E
WW L^^ii»~^i • **«^«' s^f J-CLI//^/*IP / +' IU ! U~~> O' S~*Af/^i Contributions to Zoology, 69 (4) 223-250 (2000) SPB Academic Publishing hv. The Hague Re-evaluation of the Cancridae Latreille, 1802 (Decapoda: Brachyura) including three new genera and three new species 4 Carrie E. Schweitzer & Rodney M. Feldmann Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242 U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]. edit and [email protected] Keywords: Decapoda, Brachyura, Cancridae, Tertiary, paleobiogeography, Tethys Abstract Metacarcinus A. Milne Edwards, 1862 235 Metacarcinus goederti new species 236 New fossils referrable to the Cancridae Latreille, 1802 extend Notocarcinus new genus 239 the known stratigraphic range of the family into the middle Eocene Notocarcinus sulcatus new species 240 and the geographic range into South America. Each genus within Platepistoma Rathbun, 1906 241 the family has been reevaluated within the context of the new Romaleon Gistl, 1848 242 material. A suite of diagnostic characters for each cancrid ge Subfamily Lobocarcininae Beurlen, 1930 243 nus makes it possible to assign both extant and fossil speci Lobocarcinus Reuss, 1867 243 mens to genera and the two cancrid subfamilies, the Cancrinae Miocyclus Miiller, 1979 244 Latreille, 1802, and Lobocarcininae Beurlen, 1930, based solely Tasadia Miiller in Janssen and Miiller, 1984 244 upon dorsal carapace morphology. Cheliped morphology is useful Discussion 245 in assigning genera to the family but is significantly less useful Acknowledgements 246 at the subfamily and generic level. Each of the four subgenera References 246 sensu Nations (1975), Cancer Linnaeus, 1758, Glebocarcinus Appendix A 249 Nations, 1975, Metacarcinus A. -
No Frontiers in the Sea for Marine Invaders and Their Parasites? (Research Project ZBS2004/09)
No Frontiers in the Sea for Marine Invaders and their Parasites? (Research Project ZBS2004/09) Biosecurity New Zealand Technical Paper No: 2008/10 Prepared for BNZ Pre-clearance Directorate by Annette M. Brockerhoff and Colin L. McLay ISBN 978-0-478-32177-7 (Online) ISSN 1177-6412 (Online) May 2008 Disclaimer While every effort has been made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry does not accept any responsibility or liability for error or fact omission, interpretation or opinion which may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Any view or opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the official view of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. The information in this report and any accompanying documentation is accurate to the best of the knowledge and belief of the authors acting on behalf of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. While the authors have exercised all reasonable skill and care in preparation of information in this report, neither the authors nor the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry accept any liability in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss, damage, injury, or expense, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the provision of information in this report. Requests for further copies should be directed to: MAF Communications Pastoral House 25 The Terrace PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON Tel: 04 894 4100 Fax: 04 894 4227 This publication is also available on the MAF website at www.maf.govt.nz/publications © Crown Copyright - Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Contents Page Executive Summary 1 General background for project 3 Part 1. -
Nauplius, 25: E2017025 1
Nauplius This article is part of the tribute offered by the Brazilian Crustacean Society THE JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CRUSTACEAN SOCIE T Y in memoriam of Michael Türkay for his outstanding contribution to Carcinology e-ISSN 2358-2936 www.scielo.br/nau www.crustacea.org.br ORIGINAL ARTICLE Checklist of fossil decapod crustaceans from tropical America. Part I: Anomura and Brachyura Javier Luque1,2 orcid.org/0000-0002-4391-5951 Carrie E. Schweitzer3 William Santana4 orcid.org/0000-0003-3086-4419 Roger W. Portell5 Francisco J. Vega6 Adiël A. Klompmaker7 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada. 2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. Balboa–Ancón 0843–03092, Panamá, Panamá. 3 Department of Geology, Kent State University at Stark. 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720, USA. 4 Universidade do Sagrado Coração - USC, Laboratório de Sistemática Zoológica. Rua Irmã Arminda, 10-50, Jd. Brazil. 17011-160 Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil. 5 Florida Museum of Natural History. 1659 Museum Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. 6 Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Coyoacán. 04510, Ciudad de México, Mexico 7 Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley. 1005 Valley Life Sciences Building #3140, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Javier Luque ZOOBANK http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:88ECF808-1668-4EC3- [email protected] 8435-2E1744D603FD SUBMITTED 16 February 2017 ACCEPTED 26 June 2017 PUBLISHED 19 October 2017 ABSTRACT Guest Editor Célio Magalhães Our knowledge of fossil crustaceans from the tropics has increased considerably during recent decades, thanks to novel findings and the re- DOI 10.1590/2358-2936e2017025 examination of museum specimens. -
1 Checklist of the Shrimps, Crabs, Lobsters and Crayfish of British Columbia 2011 (Order Decapoda) by Aaron Baldwin, Phd Candida
Checklist of the Shrimps, Crabs, Lobsters and Crayfish of British Columbia 2011 (Order Decapoda) by Aaron Baldwin, PhD Candidate School of Fisheries and Ocean Science University of Alaska, Fairbanks [email protected] The following list includes all decapod species known to have been found in British Columbia. The taxonomic scheme is the most currently accepted and follows the higher decapod classification of De Grave et al. (2009). Additional sources used in this classification include Bowman and Abele (1982), Abele and Felgenhauer (1986), Martin and Davis (2001), and Schram (2001). It is likely that further research will reveal additional species, both as range extensions and undescribed species. List revised April 30, 2011. Notable changes from earlier versions: The Superfamily Galatheoidea has been divided following the molecular taxonomies as suggested by Ahyong et al. (2009). This change has been verified by more recent work by Ahyong et al. (2010) and Schnabel et al. (2011). These works separate the Superfamily Chirostyloidea from the traditional galatheioids. Additionally these works change the higher taxonomies of the galatheioid families. Potential future taxonomic changes: Ahyong et al. (2009) in their molecular analysis of the infraorder Anomura found the superfamilies Paguroidea and Galatheoidea to be polyphyletic. The changes to the Paguroidea are not yet reflected in the taxonomic nomenclature, but are expected. Wicksten (2009) adopted the classification scheme of Christoffersen (1988) for the caridean family Hippolytidae -
Résultats Des Campagnes MUSORSTOM : Volume 9
SULTATS DES CAMPAGNES MUSORSTOM. VOLUME 9 - RÉSULTATS DES CAMPAGNES MUSORSTOM. VOLUME 9 - RÉSULTATS DES CAMPAGt 12 Crustacea Decapoda : The genus Platepistoma Rathbun, 1906 (Cancridae) with the description of three new species Peter 1. F. DAVIE Queensland Museum P.O. Box 300 South Brisbane, Qld. Australia ABSlliACT The genus Pla/epis/orna Rathbun, 1906, is reviewed and considered ta be valid and not a subgenus of Cancer Linnaeus, 1758. Three new species are described viz. P. nanurn, P. kiriba/iense and P. seycheUense. They are mainly separated on the distinctness of the carapace regions, extent of dorsal granulation of the carapace, and shape of the telson of the male abdomen. The genus is considered to contain seven species, and a key is provided. The name Pla/epis/orna anaglyp/urn Balss, 1922, is resurrected and the synonymy c1arified. Cancer balssii Zarenkov, 1990, is placed in Pla/epis/orna. Cancer (Glebocarcinus) Nations, 1975, is also considered a valid taxon and provisionally allowed ta remain as a subgenus of Cancer; it contains at least Cancer oregonensis Rathbun, 1898, and C. arnphioe/us Rathbun, 1898. Pla/epis/orna is restricted to deeper water, mostly greater than 350 m, in the Indo-West Pacifie Oceans, and this is briefly discussed in relation to recent biogeographic theories. RÉsuMÉ Le genre Pla/epis/orna, après un réexamen, est considéré comme étant un genre valide et non un sous-genre de Cancer Linné, 1758. Trois nouvelles espèces sont décrites: P. nanurn, P. kiriba/iense and P. seyche/lense. Elles se distinguent les unes des autres principalement par la netteté plus ou moins grande des régions de la carapace, le développement de la granulation de la face dorsale de la carapace, ainsi que la forme du dernier segment de l'abdomen mâle.