Experiences of Families Living in Kingshurst, North Solihull

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Experiences of Families Living in Kingshurst, North Solihull EXPERIENCES OF FAMILIES LIVING IN KINGSHURST, NORTH SOLIHULL A REPORT OF RESEARCH COMMISSIONED BY THE CHILDREN’S SOCIETY Pam Lowe, Demelza Jones, Karen West & Crispian Fuller, Aston University September 2014 CONTENTS Executive summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 The research .............................................................................................................................. 6 Background ............................................................................................................................. 6 Project plan and fieldwork ..................................................................................................... 8 Families in Kingshurst: Three vignettes .................................................................................. 10 Established Families .............................................................................................................. 10 Settled Families..................................................................................................................... 11 Transitory Families................................................................................................................ 13 Themes emerging from the research ..................................................................................... 15 Money and work ................................................................................................................... 17 Income and debt .............................................................................................................. 17 Employment, volunteering and training .......................................................................... 21 Community and relationships .............................................................................................. 26 Friends, family and community ........................................................................................ 26 Relationships with professionals and stigma ................................................................... 29 Crime and anti-social behaviour ...................................................................................... 33 Racial tensions ................................................................................................................. 38 The local environment .......................................................................................................... 40 Housing ............................................................................................................................ 40 Parks and play areas ........................................................................................................ 47 Kingshurst parade ............................................................................................................ 53 Services and amenities ......................................................................................................... 58 Health services ................................................................................................................. 58 Schools ............................................................................................................................. 59 Local amenities for children ............................................................................................. 61 Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 66 Developing Kingshurst and the local community ................................................................. 66 Developing infrastructure ................................................................................................ 66 Developing capacity in the local voluntary sector ........................................................... 66 Addressing stigma ............................................................................................................ 67 Inter-service working and relationships ........................................................................... 68 Developing a Children and Family Zone ........................................................................... 68 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 69 Appendix: Evidence summary ................................................................................................ 70 FIGURES Figure 1: Kingshurst & surrounding areas ................................................................................. 6 Figure 2: LSOAs in Smith's Wood (left) & Kingshurst & Fordbridge (right) ............................... 7 Figure 3: Postcode-gang graffiti in Kingshurst ......................................................................... 36 Figure 4: The gates on the Parade ........................................................................................... 37 Figure 5: Types of housing in Kingshurst ................................................................................. 41 Figure 6: Draw & write sheets completed by primary-age children ....................................... 47 Figure 7: Broken play equipment at Babbs Mill ...................................................................... 49 Figure 8: Graffiti at Kingshurst Park ......................................................................................... 49 Figure 9: Kingshurst Park with Marsden Drive in background ................................................ 51 Figure 10: Kingshurst Parade ................................................................................................... 53 Figure 11: Entrance to Kingshurst Library ................................................................................ 56 Figure 12: Site awaiting redevelopment .................................................................................. 57 Figure 13: The doctor's surgery ............................................................................................... 58 Figure 14: Draw & write sheet ................................................................................................. 59 Figure 15: Draw & write sheet ................................................................................................. 62 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This report sets out findings of a rapid-ethnographic research project commissioned by The Children’s Society and conducted by a research team from Aston University into the experiences of families living in Kingshurst – a neighbourhood within the metropolitan borough of Solihull in the West Midlands. 2. Statistics have shown that there are high levels of deprivation in the area; with child poverty ranging from 50% in Babbs Mill North to 16% in Babbs Mill South. This variation hides the different socio-economic position and mixed needs of local residents. 3. The project consisted of the production of an evidence summary, and interviews and observations with professionals and families living in the area. We spent time at sessions for pre-school children, attended local schools, and went to a range of organised children’s activities and other community activities. 4. There were two main limitations to the fieldwork. First, there were a number of other research activities ongoing in the area that had a significant impact on recruitment and limited what some informants shared with us. The second limitation was that we would have preferred to have had more contact with young people. 5. We found that there were three different groups of families living in the area. Each of the family groups represents different geographical and social network relationships: . Established families: Families with strong roots in the area . Settled families: Families who chose to live in Kingshurst, but plan to move on . Transitory families: Newly arrived families who have few local connections Each of these groups have different needs in terms of local services, and it is unlikely thatthat a single strategy will be able to meet their diverse needs. 6. Stigma is a significant issue for people living in the area. Many families reported incidents when they were judged or patronised rather than supported by local services or professionals, and disliked high levels of surveillance over family life. Reducing the stigmatisation of families is essential if trust of service providers is to be increased. 7. The majority of issues for Established and Settled families are structural in origin. They have need of better housing and decent jobs, but are well equipped to make full use of the resources they have access to in order to help their children reach their full Page | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY potential. Transitory families would benefit from more community support providing it was available in a non-stigmatising manner. 8. There were marked difference between professionals and families in relation to children’s futures. Some professionals believed that many families in the area lacked aspirations for their children. In contrast, many families believed it was the low expectations of educational professionals that was an issue, whilst they stressed the importance of education in securing a future for their children. 9. For Established families, local ties were often strong
Recommended publications
  • Summer 2019 Welcome to Your New Look Newsletter. This Reflects Our New Branding and Fresh Modern Logo. We Hope You Enjoy This First Edition
    NEWSFor tenants and leaseholders of Solihull Community Housing Summer 2019 New look for SCH! Welcome to your new look newsletter. This reflects our new branding and fresh modern logo. We hope you enjoy this first edition. Message from Fiona Welcome to the but social housing remains around high rise buildings. summer newsletter – as important today as it was This new team will act I hope you like the new back then. as a one-stop approach look and the new logo! Our Engagement Team have to all aspects of safety lined up a number of events to which is an issue that It’s another busy we continue to edition which I hope celebrate the centenary of the Addison Act and we’ll have prioritise. you find an interesting some pictures of these in the and enjoyable read. The team will work next newsletter. in accordance with Along with lots of other I am also very pleased to guidelines from the council landlords, this year announce that we have just Hackitt Review, which Fiona Hughes we are celebrating the introduced a new ‘Safer conducted a thorough Chief Executive centenary of the Addison Act. Homes’ team. This is in direct assessment into all the One hundred years ago the response to the Grenfell circumstances surrounding Government of the day Tower fire tragedy. the Grenfell disaster. introduced this new idea to The Social Housing Green One of the key outcomes working closely with tenants. build and provide social Paper that was published of the Hackitt Review housing. this year led to a complete was around customer Look out for more information Things may have changed reappraisal of social housing engagement and our new on the Safer Homes team on a lot over the past century safety standards, in particular Safer Homes team will be our website.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Schools
    List of West Midlands Schools This document outlines the academic and social criteria you need to meet depending on your current secondary school in order to be eligible to apply. For APP City/Employer Insights: If your school has ‘FSM’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling. If your school has ‘FSM or FG’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling or be among the first generation in your family to attend university. For APP Reach: Applicants need to have achieved at least 5 9-5 (A*-C) GCSES and be eligible for free school meals OR first generation to university (regardless of school attended) Exceptions for the academic and social criteria can be made on a case-by-case basis for children in care or those with extenuating circumstances. Please refer to socialmobility.org.uk/criteria-programmes for more details. If your school is not on the list below, or you believe it has been wrongly categorised, or you have any other questions please contact the Social Mobility Foundation via telephone on 0207 183 1189 between 9am – 5:30pm Monday to Friday. School or College Name Local Authority Academic Criteria Social Criteria Abbot Beyne School Staffordshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Alcester Academy Warwickshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Alcester Grammar School Warwickshire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Aldersley High School Wolverhampton 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Aldridge
    [Show full text]
  • Austerity in a Disadvantaged West Midlands Neighbourhood
    Austerity in a disadvantaged West Midlands neighbourhood: Everyday experiences of families and family support professionals Demelza Jones, University of Gloucestershire (corresponding author – [email protected]) Pam Lowe, Aston University Karen West, University of Bristol Abstract This article examines everyday effects of austerity in Kingshurst – a disadvantaged urban neighbourhood in the West Midlands. It draws on qualitative data gathered from local families with children, and public and third sector professionals working in the area in family support services. While some of the issues raised are common to other disadvantaged communities across the UK, we recognise that austerity is experienced in specific socio-spatial context: in this case, Kingshurst’s circumstance of deprivation within a local authority borough that (as a whole) is above averagely affluent. This shaped the ways that residents and professionals framed the disadvantage they encountered in their everyday lives and work, in particular strengthening understandings of austerity as unfairly and unevenly experienced on the bases of geography and social class, and highlighting territorial stigma towards the neighbourhood by professionals and decision-makers which impeded residents’ engagement with the family support services available to them locally. Key words: Austerity; disadvantage; families; stigma; neighbourhood Introduction Austerity refers to the programmes of fiscal tightening adopted by most Western governments after the global financial crisis of 2007-8. In the UK context, while the New Labour government adopted limited austerity measures in the immediate aftermath of the crisis, it was following the 2010 general election and the formation of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition that austerity emerged as a central policy project - extended and deepened under subsequent Conservative governments since 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment
    Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region A RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD W EISH NRA Cardiff Bristol Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3. Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame - National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region* FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 2 4 (5 ) W a te r A c t 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) RIVER TAME CATCHMENT AND WEST MIDLANDS Environment Agency FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT Information Centre NATONAL RIVERS AUTHORrTY SEVERN-TRENT REGION Head Office SAPPHIRE EAST Class N o 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD SOLIHULL cession No W MIDLANDS B91 1QT ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 9 9 8 0 6 CONTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References G1ossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introducti on 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY Z.l Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land Potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Discount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category 2.13 Inflation Factors
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER)
    Agenda Item: 5 Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER) SPECIAL ADVISORY GROUP Date: 28 October 2011 Portfolio(s) ALL Originating Service Group(s) DELIVERY Contact Officer(s)/ SUSAN KEMBREY KEY DECISION: YES Telephone Number(s) 4300 IN FORWARD PLAN: YES Title BOUNDARY COMMISSION REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES – WEST MIDLANDS REGION CONSULTATION ON INITIAL PROPOSALS Recommendation (a) That the initial proposals of the Boundary Commission for England for the review of Parliamentary Constituencies in the West Midland region England as detailed in Sections 2 and 3 of the report be noted (b) That the Special Advisory Group recommend Cabinet to invite the three political groups to formulate their individual views on the proposals set out in the consultation paper for submission to the Boundary Commission direct. 1 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To advise of the consultation exercise on the initial proposals of the Boundary Commission for the review of Parliamentary Constituencies in the West Midland region and the date to respond to the consultation. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 The Boundary Commission for England (BCE) is an independent and impartial non- departmental public body which is responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The BCE conduct a review of all the constituencies in England every five years. Their role is to make recommendations to Parliament for new constituency boundaries. The BCE is currently conducting a review of all Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England based on new rules laid down by Parliament. These rules involve a reduction in the number of constituencies in England (from 533 to 502) and stipulate that every constituency, apart from two specific exemptions, must have an electorate no smaller than 72,810 and no larger than 80,473.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 the Parade, Kingshurst Shopping Centre, Birmingham, B37 6BA 0121
    18 The Parade, Kingshurst Shopping Centre, Birmingham, B37 6BA 0121 770 3017 - FAX: 0121 779 7948 Clerk to the Council: Ms Joanne Aske [email protected] Minutes of Kingshurst Parish Council Full Council Meeting held on the 12th March, 2013 at 7pm In The Pavilions Sporting Club, Meriden Drive, Kingshurst. B37 6BA Cllrs. present: D. Cole – Chair B. Mulready - Vice Chair A. Follows D. Woolley J. Milne D. Davis T. Williams R. Webber M. Dawson E. Muluka In Attendance : Ms. J. Aske (Clerk) Members of the Public: Two Members of the Public attended. Borough Cllrs Cllr. A. Nash Apologies: Borough Cllr. Mrs. F. Nash and Borough Cllr. Jamieson. 1. Apologies: To receive apologies and approve reasons for absence: P. Whyte – working late. Mr. David Wheeler RFO - unwell Cllr. B. Follows – unwell. 2. Minutes: The minutes of the last meeting held on the 12th February 2013 were approved and signed. 3. To receive reports from Borough Councillors. Chair David Cole read out a report that was sent in by B. Cllr. Jamieson. See attached. B. Cllr. A. Nash was asked to take the floor. He gave printed copies of ‘Inside Out’ produced by the CTC Academy in Cooks Lane to the Clerk for her to give the Cllrs. He had recently seen a presentation for a project named ‘Three Gees’ that involves the planning of a recreation facility that would span 3 football fields. This would benefit the Academy and after 6pm in the evening it would be open to members of the public. He asked that Kingshurst Parish Council to consider joining Fordbridge Town Council in combining a date when the presentation of the future plan can be viewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Solihull People and Place
    2019 Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council Prepared by Solihull Observatory SOLIHULL PEOPLE AND PLACE Abstract People: An analysis of demographic and population data for Solihull, including a review of evidence relating to the borough’s age profile, population change and ethnicity with particular focus on vulnerable population groups. Place: A review of evidence relating to the living and built environment, housing and infrastructure in Solihull. August 2019 CONTENTS page number PEOPLE AND PLACE SUMMARY 1 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS 2 -15 Mid 2018 Population Estimates 2 Age Profile 2 Population Change 3 Births 5 Migration 7 Population Projections 8 Ward Populations 9 Ethnicity 11 Country of Birth and Language 14 Religion 15 LIVING STANDARDS 15 – 24 Deprivation 15 Household Incomes 17 Earnings 19 Fuel Poverty 21 Children in Poverty 23 THE LIVING ENVIRONMENT 24 – 27 Satisfaction with Place to Live 24 Urban/Rural Classification 25 Green Spaces 25 Living Environment Deprivation 26 THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE 27 – 37 Household Projections 27 Housing Provision and the Housing Market 30 Business and Commercial Property 34 Transport and Access 35 CONTACTS AND FURTHER INFORMATION 38 August 2019 Solihull People and Place - Summary Solihull is a broadly affluent borough in both the regional and national context, characterised by above-average levels of income and home ownership. Levels and extent of deprivation are limited with only 22 of the borough’s 134 Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in the most 20% deprived areas in the country and just eight in the bottom 5%. Lying at the heart of the West Midlands motorway network, with excellent public transport connections with the Birmingham city conurbation and linked to European and global markets by Birmingham International Airport, Solihull has significant geographic and infrastructure advantages.
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham Airport Community Trust Fund Area of Benefit
    Birmingham Airport Community Trust Fund Area of Benefit The Trust Fund aims to benefit communities most affected by aircraft operations at Birmingham Airport. Check this list of postcodes within the Trust Fund’s Area of Benefit. If the address from where your project operates is on this list, you may be eligible. If not, then your project will not be eligible. Postcode Area Postcode Area B8 2 Washwood Heath/Ward End B44 0 Kingstanding B9 5 Bordesley Green B44 9 Kingstanding B23 5 Short Heath B46 1 Water Orton B23 6 Short Heath B46 2 Shustoke/Whitacre B23 7 Stockland Green B46 3 Coleshill B24 0 Erdington B72 1 Wylde Green B24 8 Erdington B73 6 Sutton Coldfield B24 9 Tyburn B74 2 Streetly B25 8 North Yardley B74 3 Streetly B26 1 South Yardley B74 4 Four Oaks B26 2 Sheldon B75 5 Mere Green B26 3 Sheldon B75 6 Moor Hall B33 0 Garrett’s Green/Tile Cross B75 7 Rectory Park B33 8 Stechford B76 0 Curdworth B33 9 Kitts Green B76 1 Pype Hayes B34 6 Bucklands End B76 2 Walmley B34 7 Shard End B76 9 Minworth B35 6 Castle Vale B91 2 Solihull/C’e de Barnes B35 7 Castle Vale B91 3 Solihull/Monkspath B36 0 Smiths Wood B92 0 Hampton in Arden B36 8 Hodge Hill B92 7 Solihull/Lyndon B36 9 Castle Bromwich B92 8 Elmdon B37 5 Fordbridge B92 9 Elmdon B37 6 Kingshurst B93 0 Knowle B37 7 Marston Green/Ch’ley Wood B93 8 Dorridge B40 1 NEC B93 9 Knowle CV7 7 B’sall C’mon/Meriden Birmingham Airport Community Trust Fund Area of Benefit (continued) The Trustees will give more consideration to projects in communities where the impact of the Airport is greatest and assess eligible postcode areas in three tiers, where tier one reflects the greatest impact.
    [Show full text]
  • 71 Chelmsley Wood
    71 Chelmsley Wood - Sutton Coldfield via Castle Vale Mondays to Fridays no service Saturdays no service Sundays Service 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 Operator: DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA DIA Chelmsley Interchange (Stop CF) 1032 1102 1132 1202 1232 1302 1332 1402 1432 1502 1532 1602 1632 1702 1732 1802 1832 Conway Road (opp) 1033 1103 1133 1203 1233 1303 1333 1403 1433 1503 1533 1603 1633 1703 1733 1803 1833 Blackcat Close (adj) 1034 1104 1134 1204 1234 1304 1334 1404 1434 1504 1534 1604 1634 1704 1734 1804 1834 John Henry Newman College (opposite) 1034 1104 1134 1204 1234 1304 1334 1404 1434 1504 1534 1604 1634 1704 1734 1804 1834 Craneberry Road (adjacent) 1035 1105 1135 1205 1235 1305 1335 1405 1435 1505 1535 1605 1635 1705 1735 1805 1835 St Johns Grove (before) 1035 1105 1135 1205 1235 1305 1335 1405 1435 1505 1535 1605 1635 1705 1735 1805 1835 Tudor Grange Academy 1036 1106 1136 1206 1236 1306 1336 1406 1436 1506 1536 1606 1636 1706 1736 1806 1836 Corinne Croft (adj) 1037 1107 1137 1207 1237 1307 1337 1407 1437 1507 1537 1607 1637 1707 1737 1807 1837 Fordbridge Infant School (opp) 1038 1108 1138 1208 1238 1308 1338 1408 1438 1508 1538 1608 1638 1708 1738 1808 1838 Oakthorpe Drive (adj) 1039 1109 1139 1209 1239 1309 1339 1409 1439 1509 1539 1609 1639 1709 1739 1809 1839 Kingshurst, Overgreen Drive (before) 1040 1110 1140 1210 1240 1310 1340 1410 1440 1510 1540 1610 1640 1710 1740 1810 1840 Silverbirch Road (adj) 1040 1110 1140 1210 1240 1310 1340 1410 1440 1510 1540 1610 1640
    [Show full text]
  • Over a Decade of Change
    New Shops Public Consultation New Community Facilities Demolitions New Housing Over a Grant Funding Resident Engagement Decade of Change New Primary Schools New Parks Regeneration: Before and After What’s the Story? Strategic Context North Solihull was created on open land during the 1960’s to provide overspill A M6 M A00 housing for the inner-city areas of Birmingham. The residential development, 6 A 5 A 8 which was predominantly council owned, included 42 tower blocks. With the A1 AM decline of manufacturing industries in the area and difficulties in developing the A A A00 A skills required to access new jobs, unemployment increased. The area became part BRMNGAM 4 BRMNGAM A 7 of Solihull in the 1970’s boundary changes. A0 BSNESS ARK M6 Birmingham 3 A International Airport NEC Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (SMBC) recognised that regeneration of A 6 the North Solihull area was required to address the health, education and housing A A A1 imbalance with the rest of the Borough, and in 2003 started a detailed procurement A00 A1 exercise to acquire a development partner to lead a ‘holistic approach’ to a 15 year M A11 COVENTRY regeneration programme. SO A 5 A In May 2005 a Regeneration Agreement was signed with the chosen partners and A North Solihull Partnership LLP (NSP) was formed with SMBC as the accountable A 4 body, Bellway Homes as housing developer, WM Housing as the affordable housing A11 A9 provider and Sigma InPartnership the commercial developer. M 3 A6 A A The VisionM0 Solihull Council North Solihull Partnership Funding Invests Land Invests Land Regenerating To improve the quality of life for 40,000 people in North Solihull through large scale, Model North Solihull holistic regeneration over the next 15 – 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendationsанаwest Midlands Contents 1. Initial/Final
    Final recommendations ­ West Midlands Contents 1. Initial/final proposals overview p1 6. Sub­region 1: Coventry and Warwickshire p13, recommendations p15 2. Number of representations received p4 7. Sub­region 2: Solihull p16, recommendations p17 3. Campaigns p5 8. Sub­region 3: Herefordshire, Shropshire (including Telford and Wrekin), and Worcestershire: p17, recommendations p22; and West Midlands (less Coventry and Solihull) p23, recommendations p29 4. Major issues p6 9. Sub­region 4: Staffordshire and Stoke­on­Trent p30, recommendations p33 5. Final proposals recommendations p8 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The West Midlands region was allocated 53 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of six from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub­regions: Table 1A ­ Constituency allocation Sub­region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Staffordshire (and 12 11 11 Stoke­on­Trent) Herefordshire, Shropshire 47 42 n/a (including Telford and Wrekin), Warwickshire, West Midlands, and Worcestershire Herefordshire, Shropshire n/a n/a 32 (including Telford and Wrekin), West Midlands (excluding Coventry and 1 Solihull), and Worcestershire Coventry and Warwickshire n/a n/a 8 Solihull n/a n/a 2 2. Under the initial proposals seven of the existing 59 constituencies were completely unchanged. The revised proposals retained six of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under the initial proposals there were four constituencies that crossed county boundaries. These were: one cross­county constituency between Worcestershire and Warwickshire (Evesham and South Warwickshire), one between Herefordshire and Shropshire (Ludlow and Leominster), one between Herefordshire and Worcestershire (Malvern and Ledbury), and one between West Midlands and Warwickshire (Shirley and Solihull South).
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Pupils with Medical Conditions Policy
    Supporting Pupils with Medical Conditions Policy Document title Supporting Pupils with Medical Conditions Policy Author/originator J Cook/S Groutage/S Collier Date of Approval/Review 28.04.21 Approving Committee Operations Committee Version 2.1 Policy review date April 2022 Individual Academies will appoint: Executive Trust Lead for Health and Safety Steven Groutage Academy Designated Contact Jessica Hines Date updated Version Change from last version March 2020 2.0 28.04.21 2.1 Annual review Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Definitions ........................................................................................................................................ 2 3 Aims .................................................................................................................................................. 3 4 Roles and responsibilities ................................................................................................................. 3 5 Training of staff................................................................................................................................. 8 6 The role of the pupil ......................................................................................................................... 8 7 Individual Healthcare Plans (IHCPs) ................................................................................................. 9 8 Medicines
    [Show full text]