DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Recommendationsанаwest Midlands Contents 1. Initial/Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Recommendationsанаwest Midlands Contents 1. Initial/Final Final recommendations ­ West Midlands Contents 1. Initial/final proposals overview p1 6. Sub­region 1: Coventry and Warwickshire p13, recommendations p15 2. Number of representations received p4 7. Sub­region 2: Solihull p16, recommendations p17 3. Campaigns p5 8. Sub­region 3: Herefordshire, Shropshire (including Telford and Wrekin), and Worcestershire: p17, recommendations p22; and West Midlands (less Coventry and Solihull) p23, recommendations p29 4. Major issues p6 9. Sub­region 4: Staffordshire and Stoke­on­Trent p30, recommendations p33 5. Final proposals recommendations p8 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The West Midlands region was allocated 53 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of six from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub­regions: Table 1A ­ Constituency allocation Sub­region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Staffordshire (and 12 11 11 Stoke­on­Trent) Herefordshire, Shropshire 47 42 n/a (including Telford and Wrekin), Warwickshire, West Midlands, and Worcestershire Herefordshire, Shropshire n/a n/a 32 (including Telford and Wrekin), West Midlands (excluding Coventry and 1 Solihull), and Worcestershire Coventry and Warwickshire n/a n/a 8 Solihull n/a n/a 2 2. Under the initial proposals seven of the existing 59 constituencies were completely unchanged. The revised proposals retained six of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under the initial proposals there were four constituencies that crossed county boundaries. These were: one cross­county constituency between Worcestershire and Warwickshire (Evesham and South Warwickshire), one between Herefordshire and Shropshire (Ludlow and Leominster), one between Herefordshire and Worcestershire (Malvern and Ledbury), and one between West Midlands and Warwickshire (Shirley and Solihull South). In the revised proposals there continued to be four constituencies that crossed county boundaries: one between West Midlands and Worcestershire (Birmingham Northfield), one between Herefordshire and Shropshire (Ludlow and Leominster), one between Herefordshire and Worcestershire (Malvern and Ledbury), and one between West Midlands and Warwickshire (Coventry South and Kenilworth). 3. In response to the consultation on the initial proposals and secondary consultation the Commission received over 2,100 representations regarding the West Midlands region. These representations commented on most parts of the region, with the main issues being: ● the proposed constituencies of Kenilworth and Leamington, and Warwick and Stratford­on­Avon ­ particularly with regard to the inclusion of the ‘twin towns’ of Warwick and Royal Leamington Spa in different constituencies; 2 ● the proposed division of the Borough of Solihull between constituencies ­ respondents objected to changes made to existing constituencies and, in particular, to the inclusion of Solihull wards in the Coventry West and Meriden constituency; ● the proposed configuration of constituencies in the City of Birmingham; ● the proposed division of the centre of the town of Dudley between constituencies; ● the proposed division of the City of Stoke­on­Trent between constituencies ­ and particularly to the inclusion of Stoke­on­Trent wards in a West Staffordshire constituency; ● the inclusion of the Whittington & Streethay ward in the proposed Tamworth constituency; ● the inclusion of the town of Kidsgrove in the proposed Newcastle­under­Lyme constituency; ● the inclusion of the Shropshire electoral division of Much Wenlock in the proposed Bridgnorth, Wellington and The Wrekin constituency; ● the geographical size of the proposed Ludlow and Leominster constituency; ● the inclusion of the Wychavon District wards of Drakes Broughton, and Norton and Whittington in the proposed Worcester constituency; ● the proposed cross­county constituency of Evesham and South Warwickshire. 4. In considering the evidence received, the Commission altered 77% of the constituencies we initially proposed in the West Midlands region: one of these constituencies was subject only to a change of name (Wolverhampton East and Willenhall). 3 Number of representations received 5. In the West Midlands region, the Commission received a total of 1,095 representations during consultation on the revised proposals, bringing the total number of representations for this region to 3,200. This number included all those who gave evidence at the public hearings. There were also a number of duplicate representations within this total, as well as representations that made general comments that did not have any bearing on the substance of the initial or revised proposals. Table 1B ­ Representations received Type of respondents Consultation on revised proposals Total number of representations Member of Parliament 20 130 Official political party 4 16 response Peer from House of Lords 0 7 Local councillor 55 257 Local authority 10 43 Parish or town council 21 63 Other organisation 21 162 4 Member of the public 964 2,522 Total 1,095 3,200 6. While many of the representations can be categorised as opposing the Commission’s revised proposals, there has been a degree of support for certain constituencies across the whole region. These include, but are not limited to North Warwickshire, Stratford­on­Avon, Warwick and Leamington, Meriden, Solihull, Telford, Worcester, Wyre Forest, and certain constituencies in the Cities of Birmingham and Stoke­on­Trent. Campaigns 7. As expected, throughout the region, representations from a number of organised campaigns were received. In the West Midlands region, these were as follows:­ Table 1C ­ Campaigns Campaign ID Number Support/ oppose initial Strength (no. of proposals signatories) Oppose the proposed boundary BCE­51972 Oppose 1,611 changes in Dudley Keep Bilston United BCE­51961 Support 71 5 Tyburn Boundary Change Survey BCE­51836 Support 134 8. During the previous consultations the Commission received five campaigns in relation to the West Midlands region. Of these, the campaign entitled ‘Keep Bilston United’’ was submitted again during the consultation on the revised proposals. Major issues 9. Major issues that drew objection were as follows:­ Coventry and Warwickshire ● the inclusion of the Borough of Rugby wards of Revel and Binley Woods, and Walston and the Lawfords in the proposed Nuneaton constituency instead of in the Rugby and Southam constituency; ● the inclusion of the District of Warwick ward of Radford Semele in the proposed Rugby and Southam constituency, instead of in Warwick and Leamington; ● the inclusion of the town of Kenilworth in the proposed Coventry South and Kenilworth constituency, and the division of the City of Coventry between constituencies. Solihull ● there were no major issues that drew objection in this sub­region. 6 Herefordshire, Shropshire (including Telford and Wrekin), and Worcestershire ● the inclusion of the town of Alvechurch and the District of Bromsgrove wards in the proposed Redditch constituency; ● the inclusion of the Herefordshire ward of Old Gore in the proposed Malvern and Ledbury constituency, instead of in the Hereford and South Herefordshire constituency; ● the inclusion of District of Malvern Hills wards in the proposed Evesham constituency; ● the inclusion of the Shropshire ward of Much Wenlock in the Ludlow and Leominster constituency; ● the inclusion of the District of Wychavon ward of Norton and Whittington in the proposed Worcester constituency, instead of in Evesham. West Midlands (less Coventry and Solihull) ● the division of the City of Birmingham between constituencies and, in particular, the division of the existing Birmingham, Yardley constituency between three proposed constituencies; ● the division of the Borough of Dudley between constituencies; ● the inclusion of the Borough of Walsall ward of Pleck in the proposed Darlaston and Tipton constituency; ● the inclusion of the District of Bromsgrove wards of Rubery North and Rubery South in the proposed Birmingham Northfield constituency. 7 Staffordshire and Stoke­on­Trent ● the division of the City of Stoke­on­Trent between constituencies and, in particular, the inclusion of the towns of Kidsgrove and Stone, respectively, in the proposed Stoke­on­Trent North and Kidsgrove, and Stoke­on­Trent South and Stone constituencies; ● the inclusion of the District of Lichfield ward of Whittington & Streethay in the proposed Tamworth constituency, instead of in Lichfield; ● the inclusion of the Borough of Stafford ward of Haywood & Hixon in the proposed Lichfield constituency, instead of in Stafford. Final recommendations 10. In light the of the representations and evidence received we have considered whether the revised proposals should be changed. Table 2 ­ Sub­regions used Initial proposals Revised proposals Final recommendations Herefordshire, Shropshire Herefordshire, Shropshire Herefordshire, Shropshire (including Telford and Wrekin), (including Telford and Wrekin), (including Telford and Wrekin), Warwickshire, West Midlands, and Worcestershire, and West Worcestershire, and West Worcestershire Midlands (less Coventry and Midlands (less Coventry and Solihull) Solihull) 8 Coventry and Warwickshire Coventry and Warwickshire Solihull Solihull Staffordshire (and Stoke­on­Trent) Staffordshire (and Stoke­on­Trent) Staffordshire (and Stoke­on­Trent) 11. The final recommendations have been formulated on the same sub­regions used
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rugby Borough Council – England May 2010
    Rugby Borough Council – England May 2010 2010 Air Quality Progress Report and Action Plan Progress Report for Rugby Borough Council In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management May 2010 Progress Report i May 2010 Rugby Borough Council - England Local Anthony Devonish Authority Officer Departmen t Environmental Services Address The Retreat, Newbold Road, Rugby, Warwickshire CV21 2LG Telephone 01788 533607 e-mail [email protected] Report Version 05.2010 Reference number Date May 2010 Prepared by: .................... Checked by: .......... Alistair Thorpe Sam Pollard Environmental Scientist Principal Environmental Scientist Approved by: ...... Dr Gareth Collins Technical Director Rev No Comments Checked by Approved by Date 1 Draft Issue for Consultation SJP GMC April 2010 2 Final Report Version 1 SJP GMC May 2010 3 Final Report Version 2 SJP GMC May 2010 4 Final Report Version 3 GMC GMC September 2010 Enterprise House, 160 Croydon Road, Beckenham, Kent, BR3 4DE Telephone: 0870 905 0906 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60035909 Reference GMC 0510_V4 .................................. Date Created Sept 2010 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited ("AECOM") for the sole use of our client (the "Client") and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. ii Progress Report Rugby Borough Council – England May 2010 Progress Report iii May 2010 Rugby Borough Council - England Executive Summary In fulfilment of Local Air Quality Management duties AECOM Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenside, the Bage, Dorstone, Herefordshire HR3
    Glenside, The Bage, Dorstone, Herefordshire HR3 5SU Description Utility Room 2.34m x 3.17m (7’8” x 10’5”) With a sink unit, plumbing for a washing A delightful detached former farmhouse set in a machine, space for a tumble dryer. popular part of Herefordshire set in approx. 1 acre. The accommodation has been much Kitchen/Breakfast Room 7.41m x 4.06m improved, having been newly redecorated (24’4” x 13’4”) throughout and benefits from central heating Two window seats, fitted kitchen units with solid and double glazing with brand new timber worktops, wooden doors and drawers, two-oven double glazed windows in part. oil-fired “Aga”, Calor Gas hob, a stainless steel The accommodation briefly comprises; Porch, sink, window to the front, space for an integral Kitchen/Breakfast Room, Dining Room, Sitting microwave, space for a dishwasher and under Room, Study, Snug/Playroom, Utility Room, Sun counter fridge and laminate floor tiles. Room/Boot Room, Boiler Room and WC. To the Dining Room 4.3m x 4.59m (14’1” x 15’1”) Glenside, first floor there are 2 double Bedrooms, a single With two windows to the front a wood-burning bedroom and a Shower Room and on the second The Bage, stove, a fireplace and an opening into - floor 2 double Bedrooms, one accessed off the Dorstone, other. Sitting Room 3.64m x 4.53m (11’11” x Herefordshire Situation 14’10”) With a former fireplace, windows to the front HR3 5SU The Bage is a small rural Hamlet found just and side aspects, and an alcove with fitted under a mile to the west of Dorstone Village, a shelving.
    [Show full text]
  • Trader Register Report
    Trader Region: Added by Staffordshire & Stoke Partnership Company Name: Wilcox Plumbing & Heating Ltd Street Address: Unit 19 West Cannock Way, Cannock Chase Enterprise Centre City / Town: Hednesford Postcode: WS125QU Company Website: http://www.wilcoxplumbing.com Company Number: 6376714 Distance from you: 0.00Miles Contact First Name: Darren Contact Last Name: Wilcox Contact Telephone: 01543 458074 Contact Mobile: 07970 076582 Contact Email: [email protected] Contact Fax: Trader Region: Added by Staffordshire & Stoke Partnership Company Name: cheshire oak construction Street Address: 1 whetsone road, gillow heath City / Town: stoke on trent Postcode: st8 6qf Company Website: Company Number: 8456116 Distance from you: 0.00Miles Contact First Name: andy Contact Last Name: maddox Contact Telephone: 01782 514911 Contact Mobile: 07854951056 Contact Email: [email protected] Contact Fax: 01782 514911 Trader Region: Added by Staffordshire & Stoke Partnership Company Name: Creative Domestic Installations Street Address: 42 Sands Road, Harriseahead City / Town: Stoke-on-Trent Postcode: ST7 4LA Company Website: http://www.cdistaffs.co.uk Company Number: Distance from you: 0.00Miles Contact First Name: Len Contact Last Name: Harrison Contact Telephone: 01782 516110 Contact Mobile: 07711821689 Contact Email: [email protected] Contact Fax: 01782 518237 Trader Region: Added by Staffordshire & Stoke Partnership Company Name: Homecare Builders Ltd Street Address: 1 Southbank Street, City / Town: Leek Postcode: ST13 5LS Company
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming North Staffordshire Overview
    Transforming North Staffordshire Overview Prepared for the North Staffordshire Regeneration Partnership March 2008 Contents Foreword by Will Hutton, Chief Executive, The Work Foundation 3 Executive summary 4 1. Introduction 10 1.1 This report 10 1.2 Overview of North Staffordshire – diverse but inter-linked 12 1.3 Why is change so urgent? 17 1.4 Leading change 21 2. Where is North Staffordshire now? 24 2.1 The Ideopolis framework 24 2.2 North Staffordshire’s economy 25 2.3 North Staffordshire’s place and infrastructure 29 2.4 North Staffordshire’s people 35 2.5 North Staffordshire’s leadership 40 2.6 North Staffordshire’s image 45 2.7 Conclusions 48 3. Vision for the future of North Staffordshire and priorities for action 50 3.1 Creating a shared vision 50 3.2 Vision for the future of North Staffordshire 53 3.3 Translating the vision into practice 55 3.4 Ten key priorities in the short and medium term 57 A. Short-term priorities: deliver in next 12 months 59 B. Short and medium-term priorities: some tangible progress in next 12 months 67 C. Medium-term priorities 90 4. Potential scenarios for the future of North Staffordshire 101 4.1 Scenario 1: ‘Policy Off’ 101 4.2 Scenario 2: ‘All Policy’ 102 4.3 Scenario 3: ‘Priority Policy’ 104 4.4 Summary 105 5. Conclusions 106 2 Transforming North Staffordshire – Overview Foreword by Will Hutton, Chief Executive, The Work Foundation North Staffordshire is at a crossroads. Despite the significant economic, social and environmental challenges it faces, it has an opportunity in 2008 to start building on its assets and turning its economy around to become a prosperous, creative and enterprising place to live, work and study.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of POLL Election of Councillors
    NOTICE OF POLL Shropshire Council Election of Councillors for Bridgnorth East & Astley Abbotts Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of Councillors for Bridgnorth East & Astley Abbotts will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of Councillors to be elected is two. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors BUFFEY The Brewhouse, Labour Party Charlotte E Round (+) Janet Round (++) Alexa Louise Dudmaston Hall, Quatt, Candidate WV15 6QN CHETTER (Address in Labour Party Tracey J Smallman (+) Steven J Swinnerton Arlie Shropshire) Candidate (++) COOPER 19 East Castle Street, Liberal Democrats Christopher P Gillie (+) Mary Cooper (++) Nicky Bridgnorth, WV16 4AN EDWARDS 30 Roundthorn Close, Liberal Democrats Andrew J Sherrington Frances R Sherrington George Harry William Bridgnorth, WV16 5AW (+) (++) GREAVES (Address in Green Party Annette S Hughes (+) Gary Carter (++) Simon Charles Shropshire) HURST-KNIGHT Cemetary Lodge, 25 Conservative Party Sarah C Stevens (+) Ronald A Whittle (++) Kirstie Mill Street, Bridgnorth, Candidate WV15 5AF LEA 1 The Hawthorns, Conservative Party Gloria J Cowell (+) Anona J Fox (++) Christian James Bridgnorth, WV16 5JG Candidate ROBBINS 21, Whitmore Close, Geoffrey A Davies (+) Geraldine C Whittle
    [Show full text]
  • Old Me All About Her Impressions of It
    ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~.~· · ,,... ~~~ ~ T '-() ~ Morris Matters Volume 31, Number 2 July 2012 Contents of Volume 31 , Number 2 Morris Matters? ............................................................................................................... 2 by Long Lankin Olympic Dance Marathon - a Morris Dancer's Story........................................................ 4 by Tom Clare Isle of Wight Morris ............................................................................................................ 7 by Ian Anderson The Nine Hours Wander................................................................................................. 9 by Jonathan Hooton May Day Mice - A Review.............................................................................................. 12 by George Frampton Ten Thousand Hours.................................................................................................. 13 The Rapperlympics (DERT)........................................................................................... 15 by Sue Swift Morris in the News - Nineteenth Century....................................................................... 16 CD review : The Traditional Morris Dance Album............................. 22 by Jerry West CD review: The Morris On Band .................................................................... .. 23 by Jerry West Key to the Teams on Cover ............................................................................... .. 24 This issue of Morris Matters could not avoid the Olympics - but
    [Show full text]
  • The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015
    The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2015 is an index calculated from 37 indicators measuring deprivation in its broadest sense. The overall IMD 2015 score combines scores from seven areas (called domains), which are weighted as follows: • Income (22.5%) • Employment (22.5%) • Health and disability (13.5%) • Education, skills and training (13.5%) • Barriers to housing and services (9.3%) • Crime (9.3%) • Living environment (9.3%) Overall in 2015, Shropshire County was a relatively affluent area and was ranked as the 129th most deprived County out of all 149 Counties in England. The IMD is based on sub-electoral ward areas called Lower level Super Output Areas (LSOAs), which were devised in the 2001 Census. Each LSOA is allocated an IMD score, which is weighted on the basis of its population. There were 32,844 LSOAs in England; of these only 9 in Shropshire County fell within the most deprived fifth of all LSOAs in England. These LSOAs were located within the electoral wards of Market Drayton West, Oswestry South, Oswestry West, in North Shropshire; Castlefields and Ditherington, Harlescott, Meole, Monkmoor and Sundorne in Shrewsbury and Ludlow East in South Shropshire. To get a more meaningful local picture, each LSOA in Shropshire County was ranked from 1 (most deprived in Shropshire) to 192 (least deprived in Shropshire). Shropshire LSOAs were then divided into local deprivation quintiles which are used for profiling and monitoring of health and social inequalities in Shropshire County (1 representing the most deprived fifth of local areas and 5 the least). Figure 1 shows the most deprived areas shaded in the darkest colour – these tend to be situated around the major settlements in Shropshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Space Strategy Rugby Borough Council BOROUGH UGBCOUNCIL Making Green Space Your Place R Y March 2014 Foreword
    2014 - 2024 Green Space Strategy Rugby Borough Council BOROUGH UGBCOUNCIL Making Green Space Your Place R Y March 2014 Foreword The Borough of Rugby has some superb green spaces that everyone can be proud of. They are places where people can relax, enjoy nature, play or take part in sport or recreation. They are essential for the health and well-being of the Borough. However, there is more that can be done to improve the quality of our green spaces so that a greater diversity of people can visit and enjoy them. We know there is a high level of support for green spaces, at a time when they have never been under so much pressure. The Green Space Strategy for Rugby sets out proposals for how existing green spaces can be improved to be safer, cleaner, more accessible, and more sustain- able, especially within increased economic uncertainty. This Green Space Strategy is a key step towards protecting and improving Rugby’s green spac- es. It provides a vision and clear objectives for how the Council and its partners would like to see green spaces planned and managed for the next ten years. Some of the improvements proposed in this strategy will take time but this is a clear direction of travel. Improving Rugby’s green spaces will also require the support and commitment of the whole community – there are many ways in which everyone can help to improve our green spaces. I hope that you will play your part in helping everyone who lives and works in our Borough to achieve our shared vision to make Green Space Your Place in the Borough of Rugby.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation
    Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation Proposals for a new pattern of divisions Produced by Peter McKenzie, Richard Cressey and Mark Sproston Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 2 Approach to Developing Proposals.........................................................................1 3 Summary of Proposals .............................................................................................2 4 Cannock Chase District Council Area .....................................................................4 5 East Staffordshire Borough Council area ...............................................................9 6 Lichfield District Council Area ...............................................................................14 7 Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Area ....................................................18 8 South Staffordshire District Council Area.............................................................25 9 Stafford Borough Council Area..............................................................................31 10 Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Area.....................................................38 11 Tamworth Borough Council Area...........................................................................41 12 Conclusions.............................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Shropshire Business Mag Issue 2.Indd
    ISSUE 1 Issue 2 A BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESSwww.shropshirebiz.com MAGAZINE DSDGSLFD FDFDSFS FDFJ IFFDF Ddfg dfgdfgfg sdf sddfdfdfd fdfgfgffdf fdgbdf gugioz xhg djsygc dygcdgfdfb FOOD FOR THOUGHT Century of success Plus: Building A Hidden Never Truly Careers Vineyard Off Duty? for your complimentary guide 01743 240968 Call to Pension Reform Pure Telecom help us get on with the things MANY SMALL EMPLOYERS REMAIN UNAWARE OF THEIR AUTOMATIC we do best... ENROLMENT PENSION OBLIGATIONS Having a named single point of contact for all our telecom requirements has made life so very employer needs to implement a workplace pension scheme by a prescribed date between now and much easier for my team. It has to be said that 2018. The Workplace Pensions Service, brought to you by Nick Jones and his team, is designed to give Pure Telecom’s support is first class. you a bespoke level of service to ensure you are able to comply with the new requirements with the Eminimum of fuss so you can concentrate on your business. WORKPLACE PENSIONS WORKSHOPS DATE: 24 January 2017 - to be held in Telford Andrew Goddard DATE: 28 February 2017 - to be held in Shrewsbury Managing Director Open to business owners or decision makers Morris Lubricants Register your interest now by logging onto www.njwealthplanning.co.uk/workplacepensions Michael Place, Anchorage Avenue, Shrewsbury Business Park, Shrewsbury, Shropshire SY2 6FG NICK JONES t 01743 244933 e [email protected] @puretelecom /puretelecom Principal For more information call Tel: 01743 240968 www.pure-telecom.co.uk Email: [email protected] the team on 01743 244 933 Web: www.njwealthplanning.co.uk The Partner Practice represents only St.
    [Show full text]
  • Audley Rural Parish Council 2011
    AUDLEY RURAL PARISH COUNCIL 2011 – 2015 CONTACT DETAILS Councillor Name Address Telephone Email Ward Chair/Vice Chair AUDLEY WARD COUNCILLORS Mr D Cornes (Lib Dem) Audley House, 01782 720289 [email protected] Audley 30 Church St, Audley Staffs ST7 8DE Mrs V Pearson (Lib 23 Hill Terrace, 07946 862473 [email protected] Audley Vice Chair Dem) Audley, of Parish Staffs Council ST7 8DD Mrs B Kinnersley (Lib 22 Vernon Avenue, 01782 721864 [email protected] Audley Dem) Audley, Staffs ST7 8EF Mr P J Morgan (Lab) 115 Wereton Road, 01782 722523 [email protected] Audley Audley Staffs ST7 8HE BIGNALL END WARD COUNCILLORS Mrs C D Cornes (Lib Audley House, 01782 720289 [email protected] Bignall End Dem) 30 Church St, Audley Staffs ST7 8DE Mrs A Beech (Lab) Ley Ground Farm, m.07973119842 [email protected] Bignall End Bridgemere, Cheshire CW5 7PX 1 Councillor Name Address Telephone Email Ward Chair/Vice Chair Mr A Wemyss (Lib 18 Westfield Avenue, m.07810006001 [email protected]. Bignall End Dem) Audley, uk Staffs ST7 8EQ Mr H Proctor (Lib Rye Hills Farm, m.07900166169 [email protected] Bignall End Chair of Dem) Rye Hills, Parish Bignall End, Council Staffs ST7 8LP Mr M Dolman (Lib 14 Victoria St., 01782 563672 [email protected] Bignall End Dem) Chesterton, Newcastle, Staffs. ST5 7EW Mr P Warren (Lib 4 Wynbank Close, 01782 722830 Bignall End Dem) Miles Green, Staffs ST7 8LA HALMER END WARD COUNCILLORS Mr E Durber (Lib Dem) 16 Hill Terrace, 01782 729271 [email protected] Halmer End
    [Show full text]
  • 1444 the London Gazette, Ist February 1974
    1444 THE LONDON GAZETTE, IST FEBRUARY 1974 STAFFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL Objections to the Order including the grounds on which The Borough of Stafford (Lammascote Road) (Restriction they are made should be sent to the undersigned by 1st of Waiting and Restriction on Loading and Unloading) March 1974 Order 1974. D. E. Almond, Chief Officer and Town Clerk. Borough Hall, ° The Borough of Stafford (Lloyd Street) (Prohibition of Stafford. Driving) Order 1974 1st February 1974. (597) The Borough of Stafford (Barn Bank Lane) (Prohibition of Driving) Order 1974 The Borough of Stafford (Victoria Street) (Prohibition of Driving) Order 1974 STAFFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that the Stafford Borough Council The Borough of Stafford (Marston Road) (Prohibition of propose to make Orders under the Road Traffic Regulation Waiting) Order, 1974 Act 1967, as amended by Part IX of the Transport Act The Borough of Stafford (Weston Road) (Prohibition of 1968, the effect of which will be: Waiting) Order, 1974 (1) to prohibit waiting at any time Mondays to Satur- The Borough of Stafford (Telegraph Street) (Prohibition of days (inclusive) in the lengths of road referred to in Waiting) Order, 1974 Schedule I ; The Borough of Stafford (Marsh Street) (Restriction of (2) to prohibit vehicles in the length of road referred Waiting) Order, 1974 to in Schedule II except for access ; (3) to introduce a loading and unloading ban between The Borough of Stafford (Alexandra Road) (Restriction of 8 a.m. and 9.30 a.m. and 4.30 p.m. and 6 p.m. Mondays Waiting) Order, 1974 to Saturdays (inclusive) in the lengths of road referred Notice is hereby given that the Borough Council propose to in Schedule III ; to make Orders under the Road Traffic Regulation Act, 1967, (4) to revoke insofar as is necessary any existing Orders.
    [Show full text]