Menzies/Airline Services Merger Notice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Menzies/Airline Services Merger Notice Non-confidential version MERGER NOTICE UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE ENTERPRISE ACT 2002 ("NOTICE") ME/6746/18 MENZIES AVIATION (UK) LIMITED / PART OF THE AIRLINE SERVICES BUSINESS OF AIRLINE SERVICES LIMITED DLA PIPER UK LLP 3 NOBLE STREET LONDON, EC2V 7EE UNITED KINGDOM AJW/AJW/311656/120225/UKM/91389352.3 Non-confidential version TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF DEFINED TERMS ................................................................................................................ 13 PART I GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 16 PART II MERGER DETAILS .................................................................................................. 19 THE MERGER SITUATION ............................................................................................................... 19 JURISDICTION ................................................................................................................................... 23 PART III SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS .................................................................................. 25 PART IV COMPETITION ASSESSMENT ............................................................................... 30 COUNTERFACTUAL ......................................................................................................................... 30 MARKET DEFINITION ...................................................................................................................... 30 SHARES OF SUPPLY .......................................................................................................................... 52 HORIZONTAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................... 53 INCREASE IN THE MERGER PARTIES' BUYER POWER ........................................................... 104 LOSS OF POTENTIAL COMPETITION .......................................................................................... 105 VERTICAL EFFECTS ....................................................................................................................... 106 CONGLOMERATE EFFECTS .......................................................................................................... 107 ENTRY OR EXPANSION ................................................................................................................. 110 COUNTERVAILING BUYER POWER ............................................................................................ 114 EFFICIENCIES AND CUSTOMER BENEFITS ............................................................................... 115 OTHER INFORMATION .................................................................................................................. 116 PART V THIRD PARTY CONTACT DETAILS ................................................................... 117 PART VI DECLARATION ...................................................................................................... 120 2 Non-confidential version EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The transaction John Menzies plc ("Menzies"), through its wholly owned subsidiary Menzies Aviation (UK) Limited (the "Purchaser" or the "Notifying Party"), has acquired part of the airline services business of Airline Services Limited (the "Seller"), namely that in relation to de-icing, aircraft presentation and ground handling ("AS" or the "Target") (the "Transaction"). The Transaction is primarily complimentary, and the acquisition of the Target provides Menzies with the ability to offer new services or services in locations where Menzies does not operate. Menzies is a global provider of traditional ground handling services (typically comprising baggage, ramp, passenger and airside cargo transport services) with minimal activities in both de-icing and internal presentation services. []. AS is a de-icing and aircraft presentation (both internal and external cleaning of aircraft) focussed supplier, with minimal, recent activities in traditional ground handling services. AS is active in ground handling services at only two UK airports, London Gatwick ("LGW") and Manchester ("MAN"). AS is a very new entrant in ground handling at MAN, having only begun to offer those services in April 2018. Nevertheless, there are areas of overlap between the activities of Menzies and AS in the provision of ground handling, de-icing and internal presentation at some locations. However, Menzies and AS overlap at only eight airports in the UK (and globally, as AS is not active outside of the UK), while they are only active in overlapping services at five airports. These areas of overlap are described briefly below. Overlaps Menzies considers that the only areas where there are horizontal overlaps with AS would be in the provision of: • de-icing services at Edinburgh ("EDI"); • de-icing services at Glasgow ("GLA"); • ground handling services at LGW; • de-icing services at London Heathrow ("LHR"); and • ground handling and internal presentation services at MAN. Bidding markets The Parties have calculated shares of supply by reference to known turns serviced by each competitor currently operationally active at the respective overlap airports. However, in markets such as this (where prices are individually determined on a per contract basis through a bidding process), the shares presented can only offer a working proxy. Indeed, the CMA has previously agreed that market shares are particularly transient in this sector. Customers for the overlap services typically terminate contracts with short notice, and can, and do, invite competitors who may not be operating at an airport to tender. There are very low barriers to switching, indeed the evidence shows that customers regularly switch significant contracts with employees often TUPE'd across to new providers. Equally equipment is readily available. Due to the nature and size of individual airlines at an airport, the loss or gain of a single contract can have a significant change in a competitor's market share. 3 Non-confidential version Closeness of competition The Parties do not perceive the other to be their closest competitor at any of the overlap airports. Primarily, []. By contrast, []. In ground handling, Menzies' main competitors are [], with AS historically only active at LGW, having only entered MAN in April 2018. At LGW and MAN there are a sufficient number of handlers that have successfully bid for ground handling contracts historically (even when considered from an individual service line perspective) and a sufficient number of remaining handlers and bidders (and consequential competitive constraint) that will exist post-Transaction. Considering de-icing, AS was traditionally a de-icing and aircraft presentation specialist business, with its main competitors being []. At LHR, there will remain a sufficient number of de-icing providers (or potential providers) following the Transaction (either across the airport or from a terminal-by-terminal perspective). At EDI and GLA, there are notably fewer competitors than at LHR, but this is due to the dynamics at smaller airports, where there simply is not enough business to maintain a large number of de-icers (de-icing is entirely seasonal work). Swissport (which is an established global business offering an identical range of services as the Merged Entity) will remain the strongest competitor at both of these airports, and will certainly constrain the Merged Entity. Furthermore, Menzies only recently began providing de-icing services at GLA following a regional tender for []. The Transaction simply reverts the levels of competition to that which existed before that tender. Equally, in internal presentation, Menzies is a minor player and does not typically do any cleaning at the majority of UK airports. Key competitors of AS are companies like []. The only location where Menzies and AS overlap for internal presentation is at MAN, however at least four competitors will remain at MAN following the Transaction. Competitive constraints From the supply side, the markets in question include both independent providers (without corporate ties to airlines) and providers under airline ownership (which typically compete to service third party airlines alongside self-supplying their parent airline). Providers invariably operate across numerous airports throughout the UK (and internationally) and it is the case that competitive constraints are apparent at any particular airport from: (i) those providers that are currently operationally active at that airport; (ii) those providers that are not, but will be known by the airlines from other airports and consequently invited to bid for contracts (particularly given a lack of any barriers to expansion); and (iii) the threat that an airline could turn to self-supplying. This would be the case at EDI and GLA despite the perceived concentration post-Transaction. In this industry it is common for there to be only one or two providers at small airports. The airlines retain other means of exercising their buyer power (for example, employing numerous contracts with the same providers across different airports, hosting multi-airport tenders on a sole contract basis and the threat of switching to self-supply).
Recommended publications
  • Employment and Working Conditions in the Air Transport Sector Over the Period 1997/2010
    Study on the effects of the implementation of the EU aviation common market on employment and working conditions in the Air Transport Sector over the period 1997/2010 Final Report Report July 2012 Prepared for: Prepared by: European Commission Steer Davies Gleave DG MOVE 28-32 Upper Ground Unit E1 London SE1 9PD DM 24-5/106 B-1049 Brussels Belgium +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Final Report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... I Background ............................................................................................ i Scope of this study ................................................................................... i Conclusions ........................................................................................... ii Recommendations .................................................................................. xi 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................ 1 Key findings of the 2010 Working Document .................................................... 1 The need for this study ............................................................................. 1 Structure of this report ............................................................................. 2 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ....................................................................... 3 Objectives
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Statement, Lynne Embleton, CEO, Aer Lingus
    Supplemental Aer Lingus Opening Statement to Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications Committee – 22nd June 2021 Introduction Thank you for the opportunity to engage - once again - with the Transport and Communications committee. I will assume you have read the Aer Lingus opening statement which was originally due to be delivered on 2nd June. On this basis I won’t read that statement but everything in it still stands. I would however like to briefly supplement it to highlight some specific issues that need to be addressed urgently. Stobart Stobart Air informed Aer Lingus on 11th June that they were ceasing to trade with immediate effect resulting in the cancellation of all Aer Lingus Regional flights operated by Stobart Air. Stobart attributed this decision to the continuing impact of the pandemic which has resulted in almost no flying since March 2020. Aer Lingus stepped in immediately to operate six routes until at least the end of August and arranged for BA City Flyer to operate four of the routes. The provision of this replacement schedule has ensured that all impacted customers due to travel in the immediate term were offered alternative travel arrangements. Aer Lingus also confirmed that we are ready to operate the Dublin / Kerry route, subject to an appropriate PSO arrangement being put in place and that we are actively exploring options that would enable the provision of a Dublin / Donegal service. Aer Lingus and other key stakeholders in the aviation sector have consistently warned that Ireland’s 15-month long implementation of the most restrictive travel policies in Europe without sector specific supports being provided, represented a critical risk to aviation jobs and to connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Go-Ahead Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2019 1 Stable Cash Generative
    Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 29 June 2019 Taking care of every journey Taking care of every journey Regional bus Regional bus market share (%) We run fully owned commercial bus businesses through our eight bus operations in the UK. Our 8,550 people and 3,055 buses provide Stagecoach: 26% excellent services for our customers in towns and cities on the south FirstGroup: 21% coast of England, in north east England, East Yorkshire and East Anglia Arriva: 14% as well as in vibrant cities like Brighton, Oxford and Manchester. Go-Ahead’s bus customers are the most satisfied in the UK; recently Go-Ahead: 11% achieving our highest customer satisfaction score of 92%. One of our National Express: 7% key strengths in this market is our devolved operating model through Others: 21% which our experienced management teams deliver customer focused strategies in their local areas. We are proud of the role we play in improving the health and wellbeing of our communities through reducing carbon 2621+14+11+7+21L emissions with cleaner buses and taking cars off the road. London & International bus London bus market share (%) In London, we operate tendered bus contracts for Transport for London (TfL), running around 157 routes out of 16 depots. TfL specify the routes Go-Ahead: 23% and service frequency with the Mayor of London setting fares. Contracts Metroline: 18% are tendered for five years with a possible two year extension, based on Arriva: 18% performance against punctuality targets. In addition to earning revenue Stagecoach: 13% for the mileage we operate, we have the opportunity to earn Quality Incentive Contract bonuses if we meet these targets.
    [Show full text]
  • S/C/W/270 18 July 2006 ORGANIZATION (06-3471) Council for Trade in Services
    WORLD TRADE RESTRICTED S/C/W/270 18 July 2006 ORGANIZATION (06-3471) Council for Trade in Services SECOND REVIEW OF THE AIR TRANSPORT ANNEX DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AIR TRANSPORT SECTOR (PART ONE) Note by the Secretariat1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES, CHARTS, FIGURES AND APPENDIXES......................................................vi LIST OF ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................ix INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................1 I. AIRCRAFT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE (MRO).........................................................4 A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS .......................................................................................................4 B. REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS.................................................................................................13 1. Developments concerning the regulation of Maintenance Repair and Overhaul .........13 (a) General evolution ..............................................................................................................13 (b) Maintenance Steering Group (MSG) rules........................................................................13 (c) WTO developments...........................................................................................................13 (d) European Communities .....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • AIRCRAFT GROUND HANDLING and HUMAN FACTORS a Comparative Study of the Perceptions by Ramp Staff and Management
    NLR-CR-2010-125 Executive summary AIRCRAFT GROUND HANDLING AND HUMAN FACTORS A comparative study of the perceptions by ramp staff and management Problem area were sent to the target groups Human factors have been Management and Operational Report no. identified by the European personnel and interviews were NLR-CR-2010-125 Commercial Aviation Safety conducted afterwards to verify Team as a ground safety issue the results and to place them in Author(s) for which safety enhancement the right context. A.D. Balk J.W. Bossenbroek action plans have to be developed. Results and conclusions Report classification The results identified UNCLASSIFIED The objective of this study is to opportunities for improvement investigate the causal factors in the propagation of the safety Date which lead to human errors policy and principles, April 2010 during the ground handling substantiation of the principles process and create unsafe of a just culture, communication Knowledge area(s) situations, personal accidents or of safety related issues, the Vliegveiligheid (safety & incidents. ‘visibility’ of management to security) operational personnel, This document describes the standardisation of phraseology Descriptor(s) Human factors results of the study, performed on the ramp and awareness of Safety culture the potential risks of human by the Air Transport Safety Ground handling Institute of the National factors like time pressure, Aerospace Laboratory NLR in stress, fatigue and cooperation with the Civil communication. Aviation Authority of the Netherlands. Applicability The results of this study are Description of work considered applicable to all The study has been performed European ground service by investigating safety culture providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviance UK Limited
    Completed acquisition by Servisair UK Limited of the regional ground handling business of Aviance UK Limited ME/4429/10 The OFT’s decision on reference under section 22(1) given on 27 May 2010. Full text of decision published 15 June 2010. PARTIES 1. Servisair UK Limited ('Servisair') provides ground handling services at 21 UK airports. Its ultimate parent is Derichebourg SA, a leading global provider of aviation ground handling operations delivering a range of ground handling services across 148 airports worldwide. 2. Aviance UK Limited ('Aviance') is a subsidiary of the Go-Ahead Group, a leading UK public transport operator, and founder member of the worldwide Aviance alliance of airport service providers. Prior to this transaction, Aviance operated at a number of UK airports including Edinburgh, Heathrow, Manchester and Stansted. TRANSACTION 3. The transaction concerns the transfer to Servisair of Aviance's ground handling business at 11 regional airports in the UK, namely Aberdeen, Belfast Harbour, Belfast International, Birmingham International, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Luton, Manchester, Southampton and Stansted. In addition to ground handling services, Servisair also acquired Aviance’s passenger lounge at Gatwick and its cargo operations at Stansted. 4. By way of background, Aviance, having decided to exit the provision of ground handling services at regional airports, invited a number of parties operating in the air transport industry to express their interest in acquiring its regional airport ground handling business. Servisair declined to make a bid for Aviance’s ground handling business as a whole. 1 5. Aviance retained its contracts at London Heathrow Terminal 1 as a continuing activity and sold the ground handling business at Heathrow Terminals 3 and 4 to Dnata, a company owned by the Investment Corporation of Dubai.
    [Show full text]
  • Dublin Airport (DUB)
    Dublin Airport (DUB) Summer 2020 (S20) Initial Coordination Report Report Date: Wed 30-Oct-2019 Headlines S20 Init Coord vs. S19 Init Coord vs. S20 Hist (SHL) Total Air Transport Movements (Passenger & Freight) 158,047 -1.9% 6.1% Total Passenger Air Transport Movements 155,587 -1.4% 6.5% Total Passenger Air Transport Movement Seats 27,561,836 0.0% 8.2% Average Seats per Passenger Air Transport Movement 177 1.4% 1.6% Percentage of allocated slots cleared as requested (OK) 90.7% Contents Page Content 2 Runway Scheduling Limits 3 Coordinator's Report 4 Peak Week - Initial Coordination Analysis 5 ATM Allocation by Operator (Full season and Peak Week Comparison) 6 Peak Week - Allocation and Slot Adjustment Distribution by Operator 7 Significant Route Changes 8 Full Season - ATM Analysis 9 Full Season - PATM Seats Analysis 10 Full Season - Terminal Analysis 11 Full Season - Aircraft Size Analysis 12 Full Season - Seasonality 13 Peak Week - Initial Hourly Runway Demand 14 Peak Week - Hourly Runway Allocation 15 Peak Week - Hourly Runway Allocation Comparison (S20 Init Coord vs. S19 Init Coord) 16 Peak Week - Hourly Runway Allocation Comparison (S20 Init Coord vs. S20 Hist (SHL)) 17 Peak Week Histogram - Arrival Passengers (T60/10) - Terminal 1 - All Operators 18 Peak Week Histogram - Arrival Passengers (T60/10) - Terminal 1 - All Operators 19 Peak Week Histogram - Departure Passengers (T60/10) - Terminal 1 - All Operators 20 Peak Week Histogram - Departure Passengers (T60/10) - Terminal 1 - All Operators 21 Peak Week Histogram - Arrival Passengers (T60/10) - Terminal 2 - All Operators (Non-weighted) 22 Peak Week Histogram - Departure Passengers (T60/10) - Terminal 2 - All Operators 23 Glossary S19 scheduling season runs from Sun 31-Mar-2019 to Sat 26-Oct-2019 (210 days).
    [Show full text]
  • Son Excellence Monsieur / Zijne Excellentie De Heer Philippe Goffin Ministre Des Affaires Étrangères Et Européennes / Ministe
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.7.2020 C(2020) 4733 final In the published version of this decision, PUBLIC VERSION some information has been omitted, pursuant to articles 30 and 31 of Council This document is made available for Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July information purposes only. 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, concerning non-disclosure of information covered by professional secrecy. The omissions are shown thus […] Subject: State Aid SA.57637 (2020/N) – Belgium COVID-19: Recapitalisation of Aviapartner Excellency, 1. PROCEDURE (1) On 11 June 2020, Belgium pre-notified to the Commission an aid in the form of a convertible loan (“the measure” or “the Convertible loan”) from the State to Aviapartner Belgium SA/NV (“Aviapartner”), which is a Belgium-based ground handling service provider. By e-mails of 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29 and 30 June, Belgium submitted additional information. By electronic notification of 1 July 2020, Belgium notified the measure to the Commission as aid compatible with the internal market under Article 107(3)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“TFEU”). By e-mails of 1 and 2 July 2020, Belgium submitted additional information. Son Excellence Monsieur / Zijne Excellentie de Heer Philippe Goffin Ministre des Affaires étrangères et européennes / Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken en Europese Zaken Rue des Petits Carmes / Karmelietenstraat 15 B - 1000 Bruxelles / Brussel Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 (2) By letter dated 1 July 2020, Belgium exceptionally agreed to waive its rights deriving from Article 342 of the TFEU, in conjunction with Article 3 of Regulation 1/19581 and to have this Decision adopted and notified in English.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Airport Ownership and Management and the Ground Handling Market in Selected Non-European Union (EU) Countries
    Study on airport DG MOVE, European ownership and Commission management and the ground handling market in selected non-EU countries Final Report Our ref: 22907301 June 2016 Client ref: MOVE/E1/SER/2015- 247-3 Study on airport DG MOVE, European ownership and Commission management and the ground handling market in selected non-EU countries Final Report Our ref: 22907301 June 2016 Client ref: MOVE/E1/SER/2015- 247-3 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave DG MOVE, European Commission 28-32 Upper Ground DM 28 - 0/110 London SE1 9PD Avenue de Bourget, 1 B-1049 Brussels (Evere) Belgium +44 20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for DG MOVE, European Commission. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer Davies Gleave has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. The information and views set out in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Stobart Air in Doubt As Chairman Departs
    Future of Stobart Air in doubt as chairman departs Tim Jeans took over as chairman at the Aer Lingus Regional franchise operator in October about 4 hours ago Barry O'Halloran 0 Tim Jeans: he joined Stobart as a non-executive chairman two years ago. File photograph: Eric Luke /The Irish Times Stobart Air chairman, Tim Jeans, has left the airline amid growing speculation about its future. Tim Jeans, who took over as chairman at the Aer Lingus Regional franchise operator last October, has stepped down from the role, The Irish Times understands. The company did not comment on Mr Jeans’s move and issued no statement confirming his departure. He joined Stobart as a non-executive chairman two years ago when the airline made a number of changes that included appointing Julian Carr as managing director and Sean Brogan as chairman. However, Mr Carr left in late 2014. Mr Jeans became chairman last October and Mr Brogan stepped back into the role of chief executive, in which he had been acting before Mr Carr’s appointment. Stobart’s recently-departed chairman is an experienced aviation exective. Before joining the airline, he had worked for Ryanair and Monarch Airlines, where he was managing director. Stobart brought in external advisors late last year to work on a possible sale of the business which could be worth between €60 million and €65 million. This followed indications from major shereholdr Invesco that it wanted to sell, leading to speculation that Stobart might also dispose of its interest, though it is not clear if that is still its intention.
    [Show full text]
  • First London Route to Maribor to Take Off from London Southend Airport ‘Best Airport in Britain’ Will Start Flights to Slovenia in June
    First London route to Maribor to take off from London Southend Airport ‘Best Airport in Britain’ will start flights to Slovenia in June Flights to one of Slovenia’s key tourist destinations – world famous for its wine - are taking off from London Southend Airport three times a week from this summer. The Adria Airways service to Maribor from London Southend Airport will operate on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday evenings from June through until October 2015. It will be using an Airbus 319 and the flight time is around 2 hours. Flights are on sale from 30 March at www.adria.si/en with prices starting from €69 return per person, including taxes. Star Alliance member, Adria Airlines will offer the only direct connection with London and chose London Southend Airport for its service above other airports because of its “Simply Easier” operation and its frequent and fast connections to London. Mark Anžur, CEO, Adria Airways says "We are absolutely excited about our new scheduled connection from the second biggest city in Slovenia, Maribor to London Southend Airport. We are looking forward to a beginning of a successful partnership and bringing our passengers to both attractive destinations, with the new route offering the travellers from both countries to explore new destinations and everything both countries have to offer. We are very pleased to welcome travellers from UK to enjoy the diversity of Slovenia and all that it has to offer; from mountains to seaside." Maribor was European Capital of Culture in 2012, and is renowned for its Lent International Summer Festival, one of the Top 50 events in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Guideline 1: Dublin Airport Procedures for Urgent Or Time Critical Operations
    Local Guideline 1: Dublin Airport Procedures for Urgent or Time Critical Operations 1. By virtue of Article 2(g) of the Slot Regulation, State flights, emergency landings and humanitarian flights may operate at a coordinated airport without a slot allocated by the Coordinator. With the exception of emergency landings, operators of such flights should apply to the Coordinator in advance and provide all necessary information to determine the flight’s status. The Coordinator will allocate an available slot to these flights, where possible, to ensure that airport operations are not prejudiced. If no slot is available the flight can still operate. Emergency landings must be notified to the Coordinator as soon as possible after the event for monitoring purposes. Examples of Humanitarian flights include Medical Emergencies, Donor Flights, Search and Rescue, Air Ambulance flights where the condition of the patient is urgent or acute. 2. There are some types of operation that may be considered time critical. All such flights require a slot allocated in advance by the Coordinator. To accommodate these types of operation the coordinator may ‘overbook’ the normal coordination parameters having taken into account the congestion likely to occur and the overall capacity situation. The Coordinator will overbook a maximum of one flight per hour. These types of operation are: a) Technical Flights Radar and ILS calibration flights, Air Tests limited to daylight hours for technical reasons and where no feasible slots are available. b) Recovery Flights Departures to continue a planned commercial service with passengers aboard on the same day following a Diversion or Quick Return.
    [Show full text]