DOCSLIB.ORG

Vitro Fertilization Twins Should Focus on Maximizing Single Embryo Transfer Versus Twins Are an Acceptable Complication of in Vitro Fertilization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vitro Fertilization Twins Should Focus on Maximizing Single Embryo Transfer Versus Twins Are an Acceptable Complication of in Vitro Fertilization Prevention of in vitro fertilization twins should focus on maximizing single embryo transfer versus twins are an acceptable complication of in vitro fertilization David R. Meldrum, M.D.,a,b Eli Y. Adashi, M.D., M.S.,c V. Gabriel Garzo, M.D.,a,b Norbert Gleicher, M.D.,d Jean Parinaud, M.D., Ph.D.,e Anja Pinborg, M.D., D.M.Sc.,f and Brad Van Voorhis, M.D.g a Reproductive Partners San Diego, San Diego, California; b Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of California, San Diego, California; c Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; d The Center for Human Reproduction, New York, New York; e Department of Reproductive Medicine, Paule de Viguier Hospital, Toulouse Teaching Hospital Group, Toulouse, France; f Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; and g Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa Disclaimer: Authors for ‘‘fertile battles’’ are chosen to represent the full breadth of opinions. Individual authors, even within one side of the debate, do not necessarily agree with all viewpoints expressed. PRO: Prevention of in vitro CON: Twins are an fertilization twins should acceptable complication of focus on maximizing single in vitro fertilization embryo transfer Con 1. Eli Y. Adashi, M.D., Pro 1. Gabriel Garzo, M.D. M.S. Twin pregnancy is an iatrogenic The birth of twins need not invariably complication of in vitro fertilization be viewed as an adverse outcome of (IVF) associated with severe as well as ART (39). A uniform eSET policy subtle adverse outcomes (1).With may not meet patient expectations higher implantation rates (IRs) and (40) and may be seen as arbitrary refined cryopreservation protocols for extra embryos (2), and not suited to their individual desires and circumstances many centers like ours worldwide have made single embryo (39, 40). Discretionary DETs have their place when preferred transfer (SET) the default choice for most IVF couples. When by the couple, absent overriding contraindications. Patient accompanied by preimplantation genetic screening, elective autonomy, long-standing infertility, and advancing age SET (eSET) pregnancy rates at all ages have reached 50% or warrant nothing less. That said, a selective DET policy is not higher (3), whereas double embryo transfer (DET) would carry incompatible with the outlook that eSETs are preferable an unacceptable risk of twins. Equivalent or superior results when feasible and agreed upon by both physician and patient. can be achieved with sequential transfer of the two embryos The option of selective DETs has consistently been (4–6). We provide detailed counselling at the initial visit so acknowledged for IVF programs and their patients by our na- that a couple has the opportunity to seek another provider if tional organizations. According to the most recent guidelines they disagree with our center's policy. Once a comprehensive published in 2017 by the American Society for Reproductive presentation of the risks and alternatives has been made, it is Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technol- our experience that most couples prefer single embryo transfer. ogy, the recommended limit for the number of blastocysts to Received December 5, 2017; accepted December 5, 2017. D.R.M. has nothing to disclose. E.Y.A. has nothing to disclose. G.G. has nothing to disclose. N.G. has nothing to disclose. J.P. has nothing to disclose. A.P. has nothing to disclose. B.V.V. has nothing to disclose. You can discuss this article with its authors and other readers at https://www.fertstertdialog.com/users/16110-fertility-and-sterility/posts/28431-25401 Correspondence: David R. Meldrum, M.D., Reproductive Partners San Diego, 9850 Genesee Ave, Suite 800, La Jolla, CA, 92037 (E-mail: drmeldrum@gmail. com). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.005 Copyright ©2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Published by Elsevier Inc. VOL. 109 NO. 2 / FEBRUARY 2018 223 FERTILE BATTLE PRO: Prevention of in vitro fertilization twins CON: Twins are an acceptable complication of should focus on maximizing single embryo in vitro fertilization (continued) transfer (continued) In addition to more serious risks outlined below, it is now be transferred for a favorable prognosis couple (with the known, compared to births at 39 weeks, early-term births exception of euploid embryos) is 1, %2, and %3for patients (37-38 weeks) are associated with an increase in adverse neonatal <37, 38-40, and 41-42 years of age, respectively (38). outcomes by a magnitude of up to 4-fold at 37 weeks and 2-fold at A debate over the relative utility of eSET and DET policies 38 weeks (7, 8). These are primarily respiratory and with Caesarian need not resolve the simpler question, that is, whether or not delivery (9), which is the mode of delivery for most IVF twins, but twin pregnancies constitute an undesirable outcome of either also include other neonatal complications. Because the modal assisted or unassisted conception. All else being equal, twin week (highest frequency) for assisted reproductive technology pregnancies are best avoided (41–45). The mono-ovulatory (ART) twin births is 37 weeks, 39.2% of twins are born early- uniparous species that is humanity is ill-designed to accom- term (1). If we add the risk of preterm birth (53.8% in this study) modate multiple intrauterine offspring (46). What is under plus early-term, twins have over a 90% risk of being born before discussion herein is the rationalization of those twin pregnan- 39 weeks and at risk of an adverse outcome. cies that are the product of a discretionary DET policy that is The brain grows rapidly during the final four weeks of preg- selectively applied (39, 40). nancy, with a nearly 50% increase in cortical gray matter (10),a A uniform eSET policy is hardly without shortcomings. In nearly threefold increase in myelinated white matter (10),and the eyes of DET-eligible patients, it may be considered as need- increasing neuronal and gyral differentiation (11).Inalargestudy lessly effort and cost intensive at best, and potentially compro- of third grade children, math and reading scores progressively mising to their chance of success at worst. Although the total increasedfrom37to40weeks(12).Inchildrenbornat34to cost-effectiveness into the neonatal period of eSET can be ques- 36 weeks there is an increased incidence of a variety of abnormal- tioned when compared to the costs of DET because of the higher ities of intellectual and neurologic function (12), and with greater success rate of DET (47, 48), when DET was compared to two degrees of prematurity, such deficits are increasingly common. sequential SETs (as occurs with cryopreservation of the A further risk of twin pregnancies is the impact of compli- additional embryo), the total costs decreased from 581 to 386 cations on families. Birth of a severely handicapped child can million dollars per 10,000 births (49). However, from purely a be devastating, and siblings of a disabled child can be psycho- patient rather than societal perspective, infertility treatment logically affected (13). Mothers of twins have a higher risk of expenses are out of the couple's pockets, whereas pregnancy depression, and divorce is more common (14, 15). and neonatal costs come out of a different pocket (medical It has been suggested eSET is not appropriate in older women insurance). A uniform eSET policy may also be regarded as ill- or younger women facing a progressive decrease in ovarian func- suited for couples who prefer an accelerated approach to family tion, and that twins are a desirable outcome to help them com- building, particularly in the presence of age-dependent decre- fi plete their family. However, twins will signi cantly increase ments in ovarian function. Other examples include those af- the risk of maternal complications in older women (16).Analter- flicted with age-inappropriate ovarian function, those who native is to undergo two or more banking cycles to store multiple may have previously experienced an IVF failure, or those who euploid embryos while fertility is higher, which will also reduce lack the psychological and/or financial means to embark on miscarriage and its associated delays and psychological trauma. what could prove to be a long stretch of uncertainty. As has DET may decrease the chance of later pregnancies if only one of been repeatedly shown, the success rates of DETs are superior the embryos implants, because a further cycle will be delayed un- to those of eSETs (48, 50, 51). Although the cumulative live til after delivery. birth rate of sequential eSETs is comparable if not superior to Insurance companies in the U.S. are increasingly encour- that effected by a single DET in the context of the young aging eSET by choosing referral centers based on the number patient (50, 51), for older couples or for those with specific of embryos transferred, due to high costs of providing medical pathologies, that may not be the case. Furthermore, for couples fi care to preterm babies (14),furthermagni ed now that more desiring more than one or two offspring, a more accelerated extremely premature babies are surviving (14). Lifetime expenses approach may be more in concert with those desires. It is here of medical care for resulting disabilities further increase costs. that all-important patient autonomy must be preserved with Pro 2. Anja Pinborg, M.D., eSETs not being mandated for lower prognosis couples by pro- D.M.Sc. viders, payers nor by national guidelines or regulations. In 2015, the national twin birth rate declined from 33.9 to IVF twin rates have been steadily 33.5 per 1,000 total births (52) and the contribution of IVF to decreasing worldwide from above the national twin birth rate also declined from 15.6 to 14.5% 30% to less than 10% more recently.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Human Chimera: Legal Problems Arising from Individuals with Multiple Types of Dna
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 5-2-2014 The umH an Chimera: Legal Problems Arising From Individuals with Multiple Types of DNA Robert Russell Granzen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Recommended Citation Granzen, Robert Russell, "The umH an Chimera: Legal Problems Arising From Individuals with Multiple Types of DNA" (2014). Law School Student Scholarship. 485. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/485 THE HUMAN CHIMERA: LEGAL PROBLEMS ARISING FROM INDIVIDUALS WITH MULTIPLE TYPES OF DNA Robert Granzen INTRODUCTION Science continually changes, and with it our understanding of the human body. While some scientific developments are limited in scope, others have widespread effects. Scientists have just recently begun understanding the range of effects chimerism in humans can have. Chimerism, originally associated with hermaphrodites having both male and female sexual organs, is much more common than originally thought. As chimerism becomes more common, so do individuals with separate and distinct deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) strands in their bodies. Most individuals are unaware of their chimeric genetic code and most will likely never know. Because of the inherent difficulty of testing for chimerism, many problems are presented to legal system. Part I of this article will begin with the history of human chimeras. The section will then describe the ways in which chimeras are formed. The section will discuss the most common form of chimerism in humans--fetal cell microchimerism (FMC). FMC occurs when cells are transferred from baby to mother or mother to baby via the umbilical cord.1 Studies have shown that mothers may keep cells from their children for years after giving birth.2 Moreover, cells can be exchanged between twins while inside the uterus.3 Secondly, the section will describe the process of embryo fusion, which can cause tetragametic chimerism.
    [Show full text]
  • Association Between First-Trimester Intrauterine Hematoma and Twin Pregnancy Outcomes: a Retrospective Cohort Study
    Association Between First-Trimester Intrauterine Hematoma and Twin Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study Wanqing Ji Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Jie Zheng Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Weidong Li Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Fang Guo Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Bo Hou Third Aliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University Ping He ( [email protected] ) Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6551-8578 Research article Keywords: intrauterine hematoma, twin gestation, rst trimester, miscarriage, vanishing twin syndrome Posted Date: September 21st, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-75567/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published on January 11th, 2021. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03528-0. 1 Title page 2 Association between first-trimester intrauterine hematoma and twin pregnancy 3 outcomes: A retrospective cohort study 4 Wanqing Ji1，Ϯ , jie Zheng1，Ϯ, Weidong Li 2，Ϯ, Fang Guo1, , Ping He1，* Bo Hou3，* 5 1Department of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical 6 University, Guangzhou, 510623，China. 7 2Department of Woman and Child Health Information Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical 8 Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623，China. 9 3Departments of Neurosurgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 10 Guangdong province, 510630, China.E-mail: [email protected] 11 *Correspondence address. Ping He, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou 12 Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, 510623, China.Fax number: 86-20-8717 6790 13 E-mail: [email protected] 14 Bo Hou , Departments of Neurosurgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 15 Guangzhou, Guangdong province, 510630, China.
    [Show full text]
  • CDC Having Healthy Babies One at a Time
    HAVING HEALTHY BABIES ONE AT A TIME Why are we worried about twin pregnancies? We know that you are ready to start or add to your family. You may be concerned about your chances of having a baby using in vitro fertilization (IVF) or how much cycles of IVF cost. These concerns are common and may lead you to think about transferring more than one embryo during your IVF procedure. However, transferring more than one embryo increases your chances of having twins or more. Twin pregnancy is risky for baby and mother, whether or not IVF is used. Some of these risks include: Almost 3 out of 5 Twin babies are more likely to be stillborn, twin babies are born preterm, or at less than experience neonatal death, have birth defects of 37 weeks of pregnancy. Twin babies are nearly the brain, heart, face, limbs, muscles, or digestive 6 times as likely to be born preterm as system, and have autism than single babies. single babies. Almost 1 out of 10 About 1 out of 4 women carrying twins gets pregnancy-related twin babies are admitted to the neonatal high blood pressure. Women carrying twins intensive care unit (NICU). Twin babies are are twice as likely to get pregnancy-related high more than 5 times as likely to be admitted to the blood pressure as women carrying single babies. NICU as single babies. Almost 1 out of 20 About 7 out of 1,000 women carrying twins gets gestational diabetes. twin babies have cerebral palsy. Twin babies are Women carrying twins are 1.5 times as likely to get more than 4 times as likely to have cerebral palsy gestational diabetes as women carrying as single babies.
    [Show full text]
  • Fertility Service
    James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Fertility Service Information for Patients James Paget University Hospitals’ Fertility Service Index Introduction page 4 The Fertility Team 4 Referral to the Fertility Services 5 Your first appointment 5 Further appointments 6 General information on fertility 6 Preparation for pregnancy 6 For conception to occur 7 Causes of fertility problems 8 - 10 Fertility investigation and treatment 10 - 13 Treatment options available at JPUH 13 Drugs used in fertility treatment at JPUH 15 HFEA licensed infertility treatments via other service providers 16 Useful information 17 - 18 Welcome to the James Paget University Hospitals’ Fertility Service We are located within the Gynaecology Outpatient department which is on the ground floor of the hospital, on the Gynaecology right along the main entrance corridor Outpatients past the Cafe. The contact number is 01493 452366 Open for telephone enquiries: Monday to Thursday 8.30-4.30pm A messaging service is available out-of- hours or if staff are unavailable. Mission Statement The aim of the fertility service is to provide the best possible assessment and treatment for each individual couple and give them the best chance of achieving a pregnancy. We also aim to give as much support as possible to couples where the treatment proves unsuccessful. We welcome any suggestions that you may have to improve the care we provide, especially to reduce the inevitable stress that all couples feel during treatment. The Fertility Team Consultant Gynaecologists Registrar in Gynaecology: (in a rotational post) Fertility Sister Clinic Co-ordinator 4 Referral to the Fertility Service There are set criteria that need to be met for you to be eligible for assessment, and treatment related to fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • Association Between Chorionicity and Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancies: a Systematic Review Involving 29 864 Twin Pregnancies
    DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16479 Systematic Review www.bjog.org Association between chorionicity and preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review involving 29 864 twin pregnancies S Marleen,a,b C Dias,b R Nandasena,b R MacGregor,c J Allotey,d J Aquilina,c A Khalil,e,f S Thangaratinamg a Barts Research Centre for Women’s Health (BARC), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK b Sri Jayewardenepura Postgraduate Teaching Hospital, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka c Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK d Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK e St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK f Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s Medical School, University of London, London, UK g World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Global Women’s Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Correspondence: S Marleen, Barts Research Centre for Women’s Health (BARC), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK. Email: [email protected] Accepted 7 August 2020. Published Online 7 October 2020. Background The perinatal mortality and morbidity among twins I2 = 46%, OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27–1.89 I2 = 68%, OR 1.47, 95% CI vary by chorionicity. Although it is considered that 1.27–1.69, I2 = 60%, OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.43–1.93, I2 = 65%, monochorionicity is associated with an increased risk of preterm respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Eclampsia/Eclampsia in Twin Pregnancies A
    J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.13.3.208 on 1 June 1976. Downloaded from Journal of Medical Genetics (1976). 13, 208-211. Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia in twin pregnancies A. McFARLANE and J. S. SCOTT From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Leeds Maternity Hospital), University of Leeds, 17 Springfield Mount, Leeds LS2 9NG Summary. A study of 1045 twin gestations with regard to known or likely zygosity and the incidence of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia failed to reveal differences between known dizygous twins and like-sex 'presumed' and 'estimated' monozygous twins except in the 'estimated' data for multigravidae. There was a threefold in- crease in the incidence for twins as opposed to singleton pregnancies. These results are discussed in relation to increased conceptus-mother antigenic differences. It is suggested that the risk of gestosis in twin pregnancy involves more than a summa- tion ofthat operating in two singleton pregnancies. It has been suggested that genetic incompatibility Pregnancies were classified according to definitions given between mother and fetus may be a factor in the below. aetiology of pre-eclampsia (Penrose, 1946; Kalmus, 1946; Platt, Stewart, and Emery, 1958). Epidemio- A. Hypertension status logical evidence has been provided by Stevenson et (1) Mildpre-eclampsia-a basal blood pressure of 120/ 80 mm Hg or less recorded before 24 weeks' gestation, al (1971) in a study of consanguineous marriages in followed by a rise to 140/90 mm Hg or more on at least the Middle East. They also recorded twin data two occasions recorded in the antenatal ward, clinic which pointed to a higher incidence of toxaemia in readings being discounted, together with oedema and unlike-sex as opposed to like-sex twin pregnancies.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Illicit Insemination and Fertility Fraud from Patient Experience to Legal Reform
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 2020 Understanding Illicit Insemination and Fertility Fraud from Patient Experience to Legal Reform Jody L. Madeira Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Madeira, Jody L., "Understanding Illicit Insemination and Fertility Fraud from Patient Experience to Legal Reform" (2020). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 2902. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2902 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 110 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF GENDER AND LAW 39.1 UNDERSTANDING ILLICIT INSEMINATION AND FERTILITY FRAUD, FROM PATIENT EXPERIENCE TO LEGAL REFORM JODY LYNEE MADEIRA Abstract Recently, several cases have been filed in North America and Europe alleging that fertility physicians inseminatedformer patients with their own sperm only to have this conduct come to light decades later when their unsuspecting adult children use direct-to- consumer genetic tests and learn that they are not biologically relatedto theirfathers and often that they have multiple half-siblings. For instance, DonaldCline of Indianapolis, Indiana, has over sixty doctor-conceivedchildren, with more continuing to come forward. Although these cases induce disgust, it has thusfar proven dificult to hold these physicians legally accountable because their conductfalls within gaps in existing civil and criminal laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome (TTTS)
    CENTER FOR FETAL THERAPY The Johns Hopkins Hospital 600 North Wolfe Street, Nelson Building, Suite 228 Baltimore, MD 21287 Phone: 410 502 6561 Email: [email protected] Twin-twin transfusion syndrome Important things to know What is twin-twin transfusion or twin anemia polycythemia syndrome? Twin twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) complicates up to 15% of identical twins. It is due to unequal sharing of blood volume across blood vessel connections in a monochorionic placenta. Twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS) complicates 4% of identical and is due to unequal sharing of blood cells. How do TTTS and TAPS present or harm the babies? In TTTS the donor twin has low blood volume (essentially dehydration) while the recipient has a high blood volume (overhydrated). The dehydrated donor drinks up the amniotic fluid and produces less and less urine. Eventually this leads to a progressive emptying of its amniotic sac until the donor becomes “stuck” wrapped in his own membrane. The recipient twin does the opposite, urinating so much that a massive amount of amniotic fluid is generated distending the amniotic sac and uterus. Eventually TTTS can lead to heart failure or even death in either twin. In other circumstances the massive increase in amniotic fluid can distend the uterus so much that preterm labor and birth of both twins may be triggered. In TAPS donor has thin blood and is anemic, which results in higher than normal blood flow speed. The recipient has thick, slow flowing blood, with a high red cell count (polycythemia). The anemic donor twin is eventually at risk for heart failure and death.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyploidy, Infraspecific Cytotype Variation, and Speciation in Goldenrods: the Cytogeography of Solidago Subsect
    TAXON 61 (1) • February 2012: 197–210 Peirson & al. • Cytogeography of Solidago subsect. Humiles Polyploidy, infraspecific cytotype variation, and speciation in Goldenrods: The cytogeography of Solidago subsect. Humiles (Asteraceae) in North America Jess A. Peirson,1,2 Anton A. Reznicek2 & John C. Semple3 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048, U.S.A. 2 The University of Michigan Herbarium, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-2228, U.S.A. 3 Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada Author for correspondence: Jess A. Peirson, [email protected] Abstract Polyploidy is an important evolutionary mechanism in plants, and in some genera (e.g., Solidago in Asteraceae) it is particularly widespread and is hypothesized to have played a major role in diversification. Goldenrods are notorious for their ploidy variation, with roughly 14% and 32% of recognized North American species being polyploid or including multiple cytotypes, respectively. We used traditional chromosome counts and flow cytometry to examine cytogeographic patterns, biogeographic and evolutionary hypotheses, and species boundaries in S. subsect. Humiles. Chromosome numbers and DNA ploidy determinations are reported for 337 individuals, including 148 new reports. Cytotypes show significant geographic struc- turing. Solidago simplex and S. spathulata were uniformly diploid (2n = 18) in western North America, while cytogeographic patterns in eastern North America were regionally complex and included 2n, 4n, and 6n cytotypes. Cytotypes within S. simplex were ecogeographically segregated and mixed-ploidy populations were rare. Data from this study and additional biosystematic data indicate that cytotypes in S. simplex fulfill the requirements of multiple species concepts and should best be treated as distinct species.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Egg Donors Liable for Latent Genetic Disease Suriya E.P
    American University Law Review Volume 58 | Issue 2 Article 4 2008 Guarantors of Our Genes: Are Egg Donors Liable for Latent Genetic Disease Suriya E.P. Jayanti The American University Washington College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Jayanti, Suriya E.P. "Guarantors of Our Genes: Are Egg Donors Liable for Latent Genetic Disease?" American University Law Review 58, no. 2 (December 2008): 405-457. This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Guarantors of Our Genes: Are Egg Donors Liable for Latent Genetic Disease Abstract Assisted reproductive technology ("ART"), including egg donation, is changing the topography of the American family. Heated debates and legislative battles over cloning and stem cell research reveal the complexity of the moral, scientific, nda legal implications of emerging alternative reproductive methods. In fact, the field of reproductive medicine is the "Wild West" of the healthcare world where technological development is testing the boundaries of science and ethics. The legal and ethical issues intrinsic to the evolution of the egg donation industry are poised to become central topics of public debate as we, as a culture, reevaluate who and what constitutes a "parent" or "child," whether a human egg is a commodity, and what privacy and medical confidentiality mean relative to the right to know one's genetic make-up.
    [Show full text]
  • “But I Want Twins” …But What Are the Risks?
    “But I want Twins” …but what are the risks? A large proportion of patients (>40%) undergoing IVF wish for a multiple pregnancy, not just as an acceptable outcome, but as the desired outcome for their pregnancy. However, there are considerable, well known risks to multiple pregnancy - even twin pregnancy - as a recent letter from one of our patients to her physician here at Shady Grove Fertility illustrates: “Sorry we haven’t been in touch sooner, but the girls really threw us a curveball ...The girls were born at just over 25 weeks, weighing in at 900 grams and at 860 grams. Being so premature, there have been a lot of challenges, and one unfortunately developed necrotizing enterocolitis at 32 weeks which required surgery back in May. The other had a “scare” but did not wind up being treated…They’re absolutely lovely and beautiful and really interacting, smiling and cooing, which is a delight after such a difficult journey these past months. They are moving up from the very lowest percentiles on the growth charts for weight and length. We’ve been through more than I can tell you…Having spent the lion’s share of the past 7 months daily in hospital and seeing such an awfully different beginning than I would have chosen for the girls (or us)…I believe it would be beneficial to educate those considering multiple transfers about the risks of preterm labor/premature birth/prematurity (using all of its names and encouraging research)…Thanks so much to all of you at Shady Grove for the help and dedication and please thank our donor for her amazing gift that allowed us to realize our dream.” With its well know risks to mothers and infants, the decision between seeking a twin pregnancy vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Surrounding the Use and Handling of Cryopreserved Genetic Material
    Legal Aspects of Third Party Reproduction: Issues Surrounding the Use and Handling of Cryopreserved Genetic Material Gary A. Debele Attorney at Law Walling, Berg & Debele, P.A. 121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 335-4288 [email protected] www.wbdlaw.com A. Embryos in the news: 1. Amy Eisinger, “Biological clock ticking? What you need to know about freezing your eggs.” The Washington Post, July 27, 2015. 2. ABC News website: “Divorced Couple’s Embryo Feud Could Affect How Fertility Clinics Do Business.” July 14, 2015. 3. Debra Bruno, “Why You Need a Prenup for all of Your Relationships,” Washingtonian, August 12, 2015. 4. Houston.com News, “Program matches families willing to donate embryos to those who want children.” January 15, 2015. 5. Michael Sullivan, “Outside the Womb,” www.lifeofthelaw.org, July 14, 2015. 6. Nick Loeb, “Sofia Vergara’s Ex-Fiancé: Our Frozen Embryos Have a Right to Live,” The New York Times, April 29, 2015. 7. Tamar Lewin, “Chicago Court Gives Woman Frozen Embryos Despite Ex-Boyfriend’s Objections,” The New York Times, June 12, 2015. 8. Maura Dolan, “Divorced couple fighting in court over frozen embryos,” L.A. Times, July 13, 2015. 9. Tamar Lewin, Industry’s Growth Leads to Leftover Embryos, and Painful Choices,” The New York Times, June 17, 2015. 10. Angela Pittenger, “Building families through embryo adoption,” tucson.com, July 4, 2015. 11. Ellen McCarthy, “Fertility medicine brings babies -- and tough decisions.” The Washington Post, May 18, 2015; reprinted as “What to do with a leftover embryo?” in Minneapolis Star Tribune, June 8, 2015.
    [Show full text]