DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resource Condition Assessment: Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Resource Condition Assessment: Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park Natural Resource Report NPS/CHCH/NRR—2018/1833 ON THE COVER Wilder Brigade Monument Photograph courtesy of Jim Szyjkowski, National Park Service Natural Resource Condition Assessment Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park Natural Resource Report NPS/CHCH/NRR—2018/1833 Andy J. Nadeau, Kathy Allen, Hannah Hutchins, Andrew Robertson GeoSpatial Services Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 890 Prairie Island Road Winona, Minnesota 55987 December 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the Natural Resource Condition Assessment website and the Natural Resource Publications Management website. If you have difficulty accessing information in this publication, particularly if using assistive technology, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Nadeau, A. J., K. Allen, H. Hutchins, and A. Robertson. 2018. Natural resource condition assessment: Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/CHCH/NRR—2018/1833. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 301/149759, December 2018 ii Contents Page Figures................................................................................................................................................... ix Tables ................................................................................................................................................... xv Appendices .......................................................................................................................................... xxi Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................xxiii Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................. xxv Acronyms and Abbreviations........................................................................................................... xxvii Chapter 1. NRCA Background Information .......................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Introduction and Resource Setting ....................................................................................... 5 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Enabling Legislation ......................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2. Geographic Setting .......................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3. Visitation Statistics .......................................................................................................... 8 2.2. Natural Resources .................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1. Ecological Units and Watersheds .................................................................................... 9 2.2.2. Resource Descriptions ................................................................................................... 11 2.2.3. Resource Issues Overview ............................................................................................. 13 2.3. Resource Stewardship ........................................................................................................... 16 2.3.1. Management Directives and Planning Guidance........................................................... 16 2.3.2. Status of Supporting Science ......................................................................................... 16 2.4. Literature Cited ...................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 3. Study Scoping and Design ................................................................................................. 21 3.1. Preliminary Scoping .............................................................................................................. 21 3.2. Study Design ......................................................................................................................... 22 3.2.1. Indicator Framework, Focal Study Resources and Indicators ....................................... 22 3.2.2. General Approach and Methods .................................................................................... 26 3.3. Literature Cited ...................................................................................................................... 31 iii Contents (continued) Page Chapter 4. Natural Resource Conditions.............................................................................................. 33 4.1. Hardwood Forest Community ............................................................................................... 34 4.1.1. Description .................................................................................................................... 34 4.1.2. Measures ........................................................................................................................ 36 4.1.3. Reference Conditions/Values ........................................................................................ 36 4.1.4. Data and Methods .......................................................................................................... 37 4.1.5. Current Condition and Trend ......................................................................................... 39 4.1.6. Sources of Expertise ...................................................................................................... 57 4.1.7. Literature Cited .............................................................................................................. 57 4.2. Limestone Cedar Glades ........................................................................................................ 62 4.2.1. Description .................................................................................................................... 62 4.2.2. Measures ........................................................................................................................ 63 4.2.3. Reference Conditions/Values ........................................................................................ 64 4.2.4. Data and Methods .......................................................................................................... 64 4.2.5. Current Condition and Trend ......................................................................................... 66 4.2.6. Sources of Expertise ...................................................................................................... 75 4.2.7. Literature Cited .............................................................................................................. 76 4.3. Wetlands ................................................................................................................................ 78 4.3.1. Description .................................................................................................................... 78 4.3.2. Measures ........................................................................................................................ 79 4.3.3. Reference Conditions/Values ........................................................................................ 79 4.3.4. Data and Methods .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Retail Listings 2011 by USDA Zone, As of Sept 5 - Please Check for Current Availability
    1 Retail listings 2011 by USDA zone, as of Sept 5 - please check for current availability USDA zone: 2 Alcea rosea 'Nigra' Classic hollyhock with dark maroon, nearly black flowers covering the 5-8 ft spires in July and August. They like well-drained soil and full to part sun with average summer water. Short-lived, they reseed easily establishing long-lived colonies. Frost hardy in USDA zone 2. 4in @ $3 Malvaceae Lindelofia longiflora Bright blue flowered cousin of a forget-me-not which blooms from late spring to frost. Long-live perennial, clumping to 2 ft by 2 ft in rich, moist soil in a half shady spot– think woodland. Great for a border that gets some water, but not much attention otherwise. Hardy to 25 below. 6in @ $12 Boraginaceae Physocarpus opulifolius 'Dart's Gold' golden ninebark Its golden foliage highlights the pure white, fragrant, summer flowers and brilliant red fruit in autumn. Peeling bark adds interest to this durable hedging plant or specimen, deciduous, to 5 ft tall and wide, smaller than the species. Out of the hottest afternoon sun seems to suit it best for foliage color. Can take a bit of drought, but best with a little summer water. Takes will to pruning. Frost hardy in USDA zone 2. 1g @ $12, 2g @ $22 Rosaceae Rosa glauca red leaf rose Grown as much for its foliage as its flowers this deciduous shrub, to 6 ft tall x 5 ft wide, has glaucous blue foliage and, in June, single pink flowers with white centers. Lovely rose hips follow and remain through the winter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Antiurolithiatic Plants: Multidimensional Pharmacology
    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2016; 5(2): 04-24 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 JPP 2016; 5(2): 04-24 Antiurolithiatic plants: Multidimensional Received: 04-01-2016 Accepted: 06-02-2016 pharmacology Salman Ahmed Lecturer, Department of Salman Ahmed, Muhammad Mohtasheemul Hasan, Zafar Alam Mahmood Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Abstract Karachi, Karachi-75270, Urolithiasis is a common problem afflicted for many centuries with high recurrence. The aim of this Pakistan. review is to provide comprehensive information about traditionally used antiurolithiatic plants and their scientifically proved pharmacological activities like analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, astringent, Muhammad Mohtasheemul Hasan demulcent, diuretic, litholytic, lithotriptic, antiurolithiatic, antispasmodic, ACE inhibition and Associate Professor, Department Phospholipase A2 inhibition as a plausible mechanism of action. A total of 503 species, 365 genera and of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of 119 families were cited for treating kidney stones. The most cited families are Asteraceae (41), Fabaceae Pharmacy, University of (34), Lamiaceae (26), Apiaceae (21), Rosaceae (19) and Poaceae (16). The most common used plant Karachi, Karachi-75270, parts are root and rhizome (25%), mode of preparation decoction (62%) and route of administration is Pakistan. oral in all cases. This review will provide the opportunities for the future research and development of new natural antiurolithiatic compounds. Zafar Alam Mahmood Colorcon Limited – UK, Keywords: urolithiasis, antiurolithiatic, natural products, drug development. Flagship House, Victory Way, Crossways, Dartford, Kent, DA26 QD- England. Introduction The belief and observations regarding traditionally used medicinal plants, increasing the interest of people to use natural medicine for their primary health care needs. A wide range of medicinal plants have been used in different countries and cultures as a prophylactic and curative agent for urolithiasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
    Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Budorcas Taxicolor Tibetanus Milne-Edwards.- a Horn of an Adult and Skins and Skulls of Two Very Young Animals, Tai-Pa-Shiang, August 16 and October 25
    59.9(51.4) Article XXIX.- MAMMALS FROM SHEN-SI PROVINCE, CHINA. By J. A. ALLEN. A small collection of mammals from Mount Tai-pai, Shen-si Province, China, recently acquired by the Museum through Mr. Alan Owston of Yokohama, contains several species of interest. It comprises 55 specimens, representing 16 species, some of which appear to be undescribed. The material is rather poorly prepared, the skulls having been left in the skins, and when removed were found to be more or less mutilated, some of them lacking the whole of the postorbital portion. The collection is of interest as coming from a hitherto unexplored locality, the Tai-pa-shiang mountains, on the western border of Shen-si, which are said to reach an altitude of about 11,000 feet. The specimens are mostly labeled simply "Tai-pa- shiang," with the sex of the specimen and date of collection, but a few are labeled as from "Yumonko, foot of Tai-pa-shiang," and others are marked "Si-Tai-pa-shiang." In no case is the altitude indicated. 1. Budorcas taxicolor tibetanus Milne-Edwards.- A horn of an adult and skins and skulls of two very young animals, Tai-pa-shiang, August 16 and October 25. The two specimens are respectively male and female, and differ much in color, the male having the body, except the ventral surface and the dorsal stripe, pale yellowish, the dorsal stripe, the ventral surface and limbs dark dull reddish brown; top of nose and edge of ears blackish. The other has the body nearly white, with the underparts and limbs dark brown; the dorsal stripe is dark brown only over the shoulders, and black mixed with white on the top of the neck and posterior two-thirds of the dorsal line; black hairs are also appearing on the limbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Water Quality Management Plan
    LOWER TENNESSEE RIVER WATERSHED-GROUP 4 (06020001) OF THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION Presented to the people of the Lower Tennessee River Watershed by the Division of Water Pollution Control October 9, 2007. Prepared by the Chattanooga Environmental Field Office: Mark A. Barb Scott A. Howell Darryl Sparks Richard D. Urban And the Nashville Central Office, Watershed Management Section: Richard Cochran David Duhl Regan McGahen Josh Upham Jennifer Watson Sherry Wang, Manager LOWER TENNESSEE RIVER WATERSHED (GROUP 4) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Summary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the Lower Tennessee River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the Lower Tennessee River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the Lower Tennessee River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the Lower Tennessee River Watershed Chapter 6. Restoration Strategies Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2: Plant Lists
    Appendix 2: Plant Lists Master List and Section Lists Mahlon Dickerson Reservation Botanical Survey and Stewardship Assessment Wild Ridge Plants, LLC 2015 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Acalypha rhomboidea Native 1 Forb 9 Acer palmatum Invasive 0 Tree 1 Acer pensylvanicum Native 7 Tree 2 Acer platanoides Invasive 0 Tree 4 Acer rubrum Native 3 Tree 27 Acer saccharum Native 5 Tree 24 Achillea millefolium Native 0 Forb 18 Acorus calamus Alien 0 Forb 1 Actaea pachypoda Native 5 Forb 10 Adiantum pedatum Native 7 Fern 7 Ageratina altissima v. altissima Native 3 Forb 23 Agrimonia gryposepala Native 4 Forb 4 Agrostis canina Alien 0 Graminoid 2 Agrostis gigantea Alien 0 Graminoid 8 Agrostis hyemalis Native 2 Graminoid 3 Agrostis perennans Native 5 Graminoid 18 Agrostis stolonifera Invasive 0 Graminoid 3 Ailanthus altissima Invasive 0 Tree 8 Ajuga reptans Invasive 0 Forb 3 Alisma subcordatum Native 3 Forb 3 Alliaria petiolata Invasive 0 Forb 17 Allium tricoccum Native 8 Forb 3 Allium vineale Alien 0 Forb 2 Alnus incana ssp rugosa Native 6 Shrub 5 Alnus serrulata Native 4 Shrub 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia Native 0 Forb 14 Amelanchier arborea Native 7 Tree 26 Amphicarpaea bracteata Native 4 Vine, herbaceous 18 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Anagallis arvensis Alien 0 Forb 4 Anaphalis margaritacea Native 2 Forb 3 Andropogon gerardii Native 4 Graminoid 1 Andropogon virginicus Native 2 Graminoid 1 Anemone americana Native 9 Forb 6 Anemone quinquefolia Native 7 Forb 13 Anemone virginiana Native 4 Forb 5 Antennaria neglecta Native 2 Forb 2 Antennaria neodioica ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Miscanthus Sinensis
    As a neighbor or property owner, you Resources for more information: can play a special role in protecting the Websites Conservancy. How can Wisconsin DNR’s website, www.dnr.wi.us. This brochure covers seven invasive plants that Recommended search terms: Euonymus, Common buckthorn, Eurasian bush honeysuckle land managers are targeting for control in the neighbors Conservancy. Wisconsin First Detector Network (WIFDN), fyi.extension.wisc.edu/wifdn. On the right side, click help protect the Invasive plants pose a threat to the Pheasant on “Access fact sheets and ID videos” and scroll down Branch Conservancy. to Terrestrial Plants. Get fact sheets for Bird’s-foot trefoil, Buckthorns, Bush honeysuckles/Japanese Pheasant Branch honeysuckle, Crown vetch Invasive plants can disrupt or degrade diversity and function of an ecosystem resulting in The Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States, Conservancy? simplified and less resiliant plant communities. invasiveplantatlas.org. Click on the tabs (Grasses, Herbs/Forbs, Shrubs/Subshrubs). The plants are arranged alphabetically by scientific name. Click on While land managers and volunteers spend the plant name for detailed information. time and resources to remove invasive plants Grasses – Miscanthus sinensis from the Conservancy, their efforts can be Herbs/Forbs – Lotus corniculatus, Securigera varia hampered by neighboring properties that Shrubs/Subshrubs – Euonymus alatus, Euonymus harbor the very species they are targeting. europaeus, Lonicera (various species), Rhamnus cathartica Invasive plants can easily move across the land- Invasive Plants Association of Wisconsin,www.ipaw. scape. Birds and other animals eat seeds and org. deposit them in their droppings. Wind carries fluffy and winged seeds great distances.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Domain Management Plan
    Domain Management Plan 2019-2029 FINAL DRAFT 12/20/2019 Owner Contact: Amy Turner, Ph.D., CWB Director of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability The University of the South Sewanee, Tennessee Office: 931-598-1447 Office: Cleveland Annex 110C Email: [email protected] Reviewed by: The Nature Conservancy Forest Stewards Guild ____________________________________________________________________________ Tract Location: Franklin and Marion Counties, Tennessee Centroid Latitude 35.982963 Longitude -85.344382 Tract Size: 13,036 acres | 5,275 hectares Land Manager: Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability, The University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee 2 Executive Summary The primary objective of this management plan is to provide a framework to outline future management and outline operations for the Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability (OESS) over the next ten years. In this plan, we will briefly introduce the physical and biological setting, past land use, and current uses of the Domain. The remainder of the plan consists of an assessment of the forest, which has been divided into six conservation areas. These conservation areas contain multiple management compartments, and the six areas have similarities in topographical position and past land use. Finally, the desired future condition and project summary of each conservation area and compartment has been outlined. Background The University of the South consists of an academic campus (382 acres) with adjacent commercial and residential areas (783 acres) that are embedded within and surrounded by diverse natural lands (11,838 acres). The term “Domain” is used interchangeably to describe both the entire ~13,000 acres and the 11,800-acre natural land matrix (also referred to as the “Greater Domain”).
    [Show full text]
  • Week of 08-04-19 Through 08-10-19 Redacted
    8/4/2019 12:00:36AM TO 8/10/2019 11:59:36PM TN0330100 19-076637 8/4/2019 2:22:00AM 91Z Property Found 800 Market St On 08/03/2019 at approximately 20:00 hours, Officer Michael Estock (82259) responded to a Property Found at 800 Market St. Officer observed one black wallet with an Tennessee Driver's License belonging to a Mr. Edward Crim. Officer wrote the wallet in as found property and the wallet was then turned into property. No further at this time. 19-076655 8/4/2019 5:04:00AM 91Z Field Interview 7987 E Brainerd Rd On 08/04/2019 at 05:14 hours, Officer Beavers #975 (61114) reported a memo at 7987 E Brainerd Rd. Upon arrival I located a w/m asleep on the sidewalk near the drive through window. I identified the male as Cory Elliott. Mr. Elliott was checked for warrants. No warrants were located and Mr. Elliott was asked to be on his way per the complainant. Mr. Elliott complied. No further police action needed. 19-076716 8/4/2019 11:30:00AM 91Z Damaged Property Accidental 18200 I-24 Wb Rd On 08/04/2019 at 11:47 hours, Officer J. Billingsley (79518) responded to a Damaged Property Accidental at 18200 I-24 wb. Upon arrival, complainant Lora Daniel informed me she was traveling west, down the ridge cut, near 18200 I-24 WB when a loose tire collided with the driver's side of her vehicle. Ms. Daniel informed me she did not know where the tire came from.
    [Show full text]