DOCSLIB.ORG

A10 Junctions and Dualling Project Development SOBC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A10 Junctions and Dualling Project Development SOBC A10 Junctions and Dualling Strategic Outline Business Case Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority July 2020 A10 Junctions and Dualling Strategic Outline Business Case A10 Junctions and Dualling Project No: BESP0020 Document Title: Strategic Outline Business Case Document No.: Revision: Rev 2 Document Status: Issued Date: July 2020 Client Name: Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Client No: Project Manager: Kate Beirne Author: Virginia Hernandez Jara, Ros Schaverien, Hermann Maier File Name: A10_SOBC_rev2.docx Jacobs U.K. Limited www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2020 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved 0 05/07/2020 SOBC for Client Issue VHJ/ HM RS JW KB 1 15/07/2020 Update following comments from client team RS/HM/SW RS JW KB and Steer review 2 22/7/2020 Update following further comments from CPCA RS TC TC KB and Steer i A10 Junctions and Dualling Strategic Outline Business Case Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Location overview .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 The Ely to Cambridge Transport Study ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Waterbeach New Town .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Progressing other findings of the Ely to Cambridge Transport Study .......................................................................... 4 1.5 Purpose of the Business Case........................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Limitation Statement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Strategic Case .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Business strategy of the promoter .............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Existing situation ............................................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 Future Situation ............................................................................................................................................................................... 46 2.5 Need for Intervention .................................................................................................................................................................... 54 2.6 Scheme objectives and measures for success ..................................................................................................................... 58 2.7 Scheme scope .................................................................................................................................................................................. 62 2.8 Issues and Constraints .................................................................................................................................................................. 64 2.9 Interdependencies and Complementary schemes ............................................................................................................ 64 2.10 Stakeholder attitudes (including political support) .......................................................................................................... 66 2.11 Options ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 67 2.12 Strategic fit of shortlisted options............................................................................................................................................ 74 2.13 Strategic Risks for the shortlisted options ............................................................................................................................ 83 2.14 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 84 3. Economic Case ............................................................................................................................................................... 86 3.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 86 3.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................................................... 87 3.3 Scheme Options appraised ......................................................................................................................................................... 91 3.4 Assumptions and inputs ............................................................................................................................................................... 91 3.5 Scheme cost for Economic Assessment ................................................................................................................................. 95 3.6 Assessment of Monetised Impacts .......................................................................................................................................... 99 3.7 Assessment of Non-Monetised Benefits ............................................................................................................................. 107 3.8 Appraisal Summary Tables ...................................................................................................................................................... 110 3.9 Assessment of Distributional Impacts ................................................................................................................................. 110 3.10 Assessment of Wider Economic Benefits ............................................................................................................................ 110 3.11 Sensitivity test results ................................................................................................................................................................ 111 3.12 Value for Money statement ..................................................................................................................................................... 112 3.13 Expected updates at Outline Business Case stage .......................................................................................................... 113 ii A10 Junctions and Dualling Strategic Outline Business Case 4. Financial Case ............................................................................................................................................................. 115 4.1 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................... 115 4.2 Scheme Capital Costs ................................................................................................................................................................. 115 4.3 Maintenance costs ....................................................................................................................................................................... 117 4.4 Funding options ........................................................................................................................................................................... 117 4.5 Expected updates at Outline Business Case Stage ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Devolution Proposal
    CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND PETERBOROUGH EAST ANGLIA DEVOLUTION PROPOSAL 17 June 2016 1 Contents Overview and strategic context page 3 Summary table page 5 Governance page 6 Finance and Funding page 7 New Homes and Sustainable Communities page 8 Connectivity – Transport and Digital page 10 Learning and Skills page 13 Apprenticeships page 14 Employment page 15 Business Support page 17 Public Service Reform - Health and Social Care; Community Safety page 18 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority commitments page 19 Implementation of this agreement is subject to the completion of the statutory processes and approval of all local authorities which are party to the deal. The agreement below sets out the devolution proposal that it is agreed Leaders will take to each council for full debate by no later than the 1 July 2016. 2 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Devolution Deal This document sets out the terms of a proposed agreement between Government, the seven local authorities covering Cambridgeshire and Peterborough and the Greater Cambridge Greater Peterborough Local Enterprise Partnership to devolve a range of funding, powers and responsibilities. It should be considered as part of the Government’s devolution to East Anglia. This Devolution Deal marks the next step in the transfer of resources, powers and accountability from central Government to Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. The document below sets out the current devolution proposal, which it is agreed leaders will take to each council for full debate and consultation with relevant local stakeholders. This process will be completed by no later than 1st July. In return for this level of devolution and local control Cambridgeshire and Peterborough will establish a Combined Authority, with a directly elected Mayor in place by May 2017 with interim arrangements in place in 2016/17.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Authority Business Plan 2020-21 ______
    Appendix 1 _________________ COMBINED AUTHORITY BUSINESS PLAN 2020-21 _________________ Delivering for the best place in the world to live, learn and work MAYOR’S INTRODUCTION – Standfirst panel photo At the Combined Authority, we are driving forward a slew of plans to keep Cambridgeshire and Peterborough at the cutting edge of national growth. As we build on the devolution deal that gives our region the power to determine its direction and shape its own future, this year’s challenge is to step up momentum, accelerating projects towards delivery. We have shown that the Combined Authority does things differently. We catalyse and enable. Unlocking, unblocking, we’re about turning vision into action, removing obstacles to transform the way people live, work and travel. By harnessing the powerful partnerships and expertise made possible by being ‘combined’, we are revolutionising our region’s out-of-date transport and digital connectivity, pioneering solutions to housing shortages, and upskilling workers to seize opportunity across our region’s evolving economy. So welcome to this, our 2020-21 business plan. It spells out what we’ve achieved already, and what comes next. It’s a plan with community at its heart, aiming to make life better and more prosperous for more people in more places. A plan to attract the investors and employers who can keep us where we want to be, a global go-to for business and leisure. This year is about pushing projects to the next decisive stage - the new University of Peterborough, the new railway stations, the world-class Cambridgeshire Autonomous Metro, bus service reform - and about delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great British Transport Competition 2 Foreword
    THE GREAT BRITISH TRANSPORT COMPETITION 2 FOREWORD The case for scrapping High Speed 2 (HS2) gets stronger by the day. Increasingly, people from across the political spectrum are waking up to the fundamental issues which have plagued this project. Whether it be the spiralling costs, environmental damage, consistent mismanagement or overwhelming unpopularity of the project, the tide is turning against HS2. With the latest evidence suggesting that costs could almost double, taxpayers are demanding more for their money. Even on current estimates, scrapping HS2 would free up at least £50 billion to improve transport links up and down the country. But were this to happen, what should replace it? With this question in mind, we joined the TaxPayers’ Alliance in launching The Great British Transport Competition in September 2018, to find popular alternatives to HS2. We asked all interested parties from across the United Kingdom to submit ideas for transport infrastructure projects. As the judges for this competition - including qualified surveyors, engineers, accountants, politicians and transport industry experts - we have been lucky to receive and assess so many fantastic entries from all around the country. The judging process began in early January and was concluded by early March. After many hours of detailed deliberation and discussion, 28 winning entries were chosen and the sum total of their construction costs came to £45.1 billion. We were incredibly impressed by the high standard and variety of the entries we received. What particularly stood out was that many of the entries required only relatively small sums of money to achieve vast benefits for local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Regional Metro
    Cambridgeshire Regional Metro Railfuture East Anglia is promoting Cambridgeshire Metro, a service of trains of such frequency that for most journeys reference to a timetable is unnecessary. The train service will be provided by the existing regional rail network, planned higher service frequencies, greater passenger capacity, shorter end to end journey times together with some selected line re-openings and improved access from other forms of transport including a light-rail line linking housing and employment areas in and around Cambridge. The number of stations are already adequate especially with the recent addition of the station at Cambridge North and with that planned at Cambridge South and that aspired to the Cherry Hinton- Fulbourn area. Within 10 years the new railway from Oxford, Milton Keynes and Bedford will provide even more connectivity and capacity to the County's rail network. Both Greater Anglia and Govia Thameslink Railway will provide a huge uplift in capacity with completely new fleets and many new services. "The Cambridgeshire Metro" can be provided by using the existing rail network with two short extensions, a longer extension and additional capacity. The short extensions are: • bringing back into passenger use the 7 miles of the mothballed Wisbech to March railway; • reinstating the Newmarket West Curve to allow through running from Soham to Newmarket and Cambridge; The longer extension: • heavy or light rail to Haverhill; Capacity expansion requirements of existing routes principally are: • around Ely including the junctions at Ely North; • doubling the track between Soham-Ely and Newmarket-Cambridge and from Downham Market towards Littleport. The train services, existing or planned, are largely adequate though there are notable weaknesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Transport Strategy for East Cambridgeshire Consultation Report
    Appendix A Transport Strategy for East Cambridgeshire 2016 Final Draft Transport Strategy and High Level Programme Graham Hughes Executive Director, Economy, Transport and Environment Cambridgeshire County Council Shire Hall Castle Hill Cambridge CB3 0AP www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 2 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ................................................................................................................ 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. PLANNING AND WIDER CONTEXT ....................................................................................... 9 3. STRATEGY OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 24 4. THE STRATEGY APPROACH............................................................................................... 26 5. TSEC POLICIES .................................................................................................................... 28 6. IMPROVING THE TRANSPORT NETWORK ......................................................................... 34 7. REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 57 8. ACTION PLAN ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economy and Environment Committee
    ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Date:Thursday, 10 November 2016 Democratic and Members' Services Quentin Baker LGSS Director: Lawand Governance 10:00hr Shire Hall Castle Hill Cambridge CB3 0AP Council Chamber Shire Hall, Castle Hill, Cambridge, CB3 0AP AGENDA Open to Public and Press CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS 1. Apologies for absence and declarations of interest Guidance on declaring interests is available at http://tinyurl.com/ccc-dec-of-interests 2. Minutes of Economy and Environment Committee 13th October 5 - 26 2016 3. Petitions DECISIONS 4. Queen Edith's Way, Cambridge, Proposed Walking and Cycling 27 - 40 Improvements 5. Huntingdon Road Cycleway - Phase 2 - proposed Cycling 41 - 52 Improvements Page 1 of 150 6. A10 Harston, Proposed Walking and Cycling Improvements 53 - 62 7. Trumpington Rd, Cambridge - Phase 2 Proposed Walking and 63 - 72 Cycling Improvements 8. Transport Investment Plan (TIP) and St Neots Section 106 73 - 112 Prioritised Schemes 9. Bus Service from Newmarket Road Park Ride Via Abbey Ward to 113 - 116 Addenbrooke's Hospital 10. Finance and Performance Report September 2016 117 - 144 11. Economy Environment Agenda Plan 145 - 150 The Economy and Environment Committee comprises the following members: Councillor Ian Bates (Chairman) Councillor Edward Cearns (Vice-Chairman) Councillor John Clark Councillor Lynda Harford Councillor Roger Henson Councillor David Jenkins Councillor Noel Kavanagh Councillor Alan Lay Councillor Mike Mason Councillor Mac McGuire Councillor Joshua Schumann Councillor Mathew Shuter and Councillor John Williams For more information about this meeting, including access arrangements and facilities for people with disabilities, please contact Clerk Name: Rob Sanderson Clerk Telephone: 01223 699181 Clerk Email: [email protected] The County Council is committed to open government and members of the public are welcome to attend Committee meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Long Term Transport Strategy 2015
    Cambridgeshire Local Transport Plan 2011-2031 Long Term Transport Strategy July 2015 Graham Hughes Executive Director, Economy, Transport and Environment Cambridgeshire County Council Shire Hall Castle Hill Cambridge CB3 0AP www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk Third Cambridgeshire Local Transport Plan 2011-2031 LTP: Long Term Transport Strategy document version 1.1.2, July 2015 For information on the review and update of this document since it was first adopted in March 2011, see the LTP: Change Log at http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/ltp. Third Cambridgeshire LTP 2011-2031: Long Term Transport Strategy July 2015 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III THE LONG TERM TRANSPORT STRATEGY IV 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 WHAT IS THE LONG TERM TRANSPORT STRATEGY? 1-1 THE WIDER LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN STRATEGY FOR CAMBRIDGESHIRE 1-5 OBJECTIVES 1-5 ADOPTION OF THE LONG TERM TRANSPORT STRATEGY 1-6 2. THE CHALLENGE OF PROVIDING FOR CONTINUED GROWTH 2-1 THE LOCAL AREA 2-1 TRAVEL IN CAMBRIDGESHIRE 2-4 PLANNING FOR GROWTH 2-6 GROWTH LOCATIONS 2-10 3. THE STRATEGY APPROACH 3-1 THE PASSENGER TRANSPORT NETWORK 3-1 THE CYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN NETWORKS 3-3 THE ROAD NETWORK 3-4 FREIGHT MOVEMENTS AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL VEHICLES (HCVS) 3-5 TECHNOLOGY 3-6 FURTHER WORK TO DEVELOP THE LONG TERM TRANSPORT STRATEGY 3-6 4. ACTION PLAN 4-1 A SCHEMES THAT ARE PLANNED FOR PUBLIC SECTOR DELIVERY BY 2021 4-1 B SCHEMES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO DIRECTLY SUPPORT THE DELIVERY OF MAJOR DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATIONS IN CURRENT AND EMERGING LOCAL PLANS 4-5 C ADDITIONAL SCHEMES THAT ARE NECESSARY TO PROVIDE NEW CAPACITY FOR GROWTH AND TO ADDRESS EXISTING PROBLEMS ON THE TRANSPORT NETWORK 4-11 D FURTHER SCHEMES THAT MAY BE NEEDED, INCLUDING IN THE LONGER TERM 4-13 MAPS SHOWING LONG TERM TRANSPORT STRATEGY SCHEMES 4-15 5.
    [Show full text]
  • NIC Camkox Scenario
    NIC CaMKoX Scenario Baseline scenario Scheme Cost (£m) Cambridge A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme 1200.0 Cambridge North New Station 50.0 Ely Southern Bypass 35.0 M11 Junctions 8 -14 Technology Upgrade 30.0 St Neots to Cambridge PT capacity 3.5 Madingley Road Bus priority 34.6 A428 to M11 segregated bus route / A428 corridor Park & Ride 24.5 The Chisholm Trail 8.4 Cross City Cycling - five projects north east and south of cambridge - key links to 22.6 cycle routes across the city Milton road bus priority scheme 23.0 Histon road bus priority scheme 4.3 Cambridge access study - eight-point plan to tackle congestion 2.6 Western Orbital - bus priority scheme 9.0 A1307, three campuses to Cambridge 39.0 Improve accessibility of Babraham Road site through provision of segregated car 1.5 access Consideration of a new railway station at Cherry Hinton 50.0 Consideration of a new railway station at Fulbourn 50.0 Newmarket Road bus priority scheme 11.9 Hills road bus priority scheme 25.8 Chesterton Road bus priority scheme 10.0 East Road bus priority scheme 10.0 Hauxton to Trumpington bus priority scheme 15.8 Busway between new Hauxton P&R site and Trumpington P&R 33.1 Inbound bus lane between Addenbrooke's and Cherry Hinton Road 18.7 Comprehensive bus priority between Station road and Gonville Place 5.0 Busway between Airport Way and Barnwell Road 5.0 Busway parallel to M11 corridor 5.0 Busway linking Coldham's lane to Newmarket road 18.7 Busway linking Newmarket road to Cambridge science park station 64.7 Busway linking cambridge science
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Shoot the Messenger Funding the Infrastructure and Affordable Housing for the East West Corridor
    Funding the InfrastructureDon't shoot and Affordablethe messenger Housing for the East West WhyCorridor mergers and acquisitions are demonstration, not cause, of our economic issues CPP Working Paper 02/2018 June 2018 Funding the Infrastructure and Affordable Housing for the East West Corridor Thomas Aubrey October 2017 Contents Executive Summary 3 The importance of the corridor 4 The project 5 Estimated project costs 7 Funding mechanisms 8 Revenue streams 11 Financial analysis 15 Conclusion 16 Appendix 16 Acknowledgements The author would like to thank the numerous reviewers of drafts of this report for their time, patience and invaluable feedback. In addition, the author would like to thank the team at Shelter for kindly providing the detailed analysis on the affordable housing costs and revenues. All the errors are of course my own. 3 | Funding the Infrastructure for the East West Corridor | October 2017 Executive Summary The 2017 general election engendered a surprising but welcome cross-party consensus that local authorities should be able to benefit from the rise in land values to fund infrastructure, thereby opening up new land for housing. Indeed, it was mentioned in both major party manifestos. Extensive research by the Centre for Progressive Capitalism has estimated that land value capture across England could unleash up to £185bn of incremental investment in infrastructure and affordable housing over the next 20 years.1 This report sets out how the rise in land values could potentially support a £14bn investment in infrastructure and affordable housing along the Cambridge – Milton Keynes – Oxford corridor (East West corridor). The proposal is predicated on Parliament passing primary legislation to enable local authorities participating in large scale infrastructure projects to receive a greater share of the uplift in land values to fund the project.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMBRIDGESHIRE and PETERBOROUGH EAST ANGLIA DEVOLUTION PROPOSAL 17 June 2016
    CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND PETERBOROUGH EAST ANGLIA DEVOLUTION PROPOSAL 17 June 2016 1 Contents Overview page 3 Summary table page 5 Governance page 6 Finance and Funding page 7 New Homes and Sustainable Communities page 8 Connectivity – Transport and Digital page 10 Learning and Skills page 13 Apprenticeships page 15 Employment page 15 Business Support page 17 Public Service Reform - Health and Social Care; Community Safety page 18 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority commitments page 19 Implementation of this agreement is subject to the completion of the statutory processes and approval of all local authorities which are party to the deal. The agreement below sets out the devolution proposal that it is agreed Leaders will take to each council for full debate by no later than the 1 July 2016. 2 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Devolution Deal This document sets out the terms of a proposed agreement between Government, the seven local authorities covering Cambridgeshire and Peterborough and the Greater Cambridge Greater Peterborough Local Enterprise Partnership to devolve a range of funding, powers and responsibilities. It should be considered as part of the Government’s devolution to East Anglia. This Devolution Deal marks the next step in the transfer of resources, powers and accountability from central Government to Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. The document below sets out the current devolution proposal, which it is agreed leaders will take to each council for full debate and consultation with relevant local stakeholders. This process will be completed by no later than 1st July. In return for this level of devolution and local control Cambridgeshire and Peterborough will establish a Combined Authority, with a directly elected Mayor in place by May 2017 with interim arrangements in place in 2016/17.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2016 Support Your Local Community March Issue 438 Welcome to the May Edition of Your Cresset
    May 2016 Support your local community March Issue 438 Welcome to the May edition of your Cresset May's a month of happy sounds, Grand Sale The hum of buzzing bees, The chirp of little baby birds SaturDay, 14 may And the song of a gentle breeze. tHE trianGlE, BottiSHam At one point I thought we were repeating last year and having our summer in March, but it has been a typical spring so far this year with sunshine and showers. The flowers are 9am to 12noon coming along, but as ever the weeds have had a kick start as well! I did have some thought for the residents of Thriplow who were advertising their famous daffodil weekend on the 16th April. With the early mild weather we have had, I was deadheading long before that. I suspect the best for their show may have passed. BOOKS - from the Library Being editor of The Cresset can be a double edged sword. On the one hand you can get great satisfaction from informing the village of what is going on and at the same time being well informed of everything that is happening in and around Bottisham. However when you get things wrong, (senior moment?), that can be the other side of a sharp blade. PLANTS - by the Gardening Club Embarrassment comes when you get things wrong as I did last month in advising the date of a quiz at The Legion on Armed forces day weekend, in aid of The Royal British Legion Bottisham Branch. The double edge of that sword came with the number of people who picked me up on my mistake.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMBRIDGESHIRE and PETERBOROUGH EAST ANGLIA DEVOLUTION PROPOSAL 17 June 2016
    APPENDIX 3 CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND PETERBOROUGH EAST ANGLIA DEVOLUTION PROPOSAL 17 June 2016 1 APPENDIX 3 Contents Overview and strategic context page 3 Summary table page 5 Governance page 6 Finance and Funding page 7 New Homes and Sustainable Communities page 8 Connectivity – Transport and Digital page 10 Learning and Skills page 13 Apprenticeships page 14 Employment page 15 Business Support page 17 Public Service Reform - Health and Social Care; Community Safety page 18 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority commitments page 19 Implementation of this agreement is subject to the completion of the statutory processes and approval of all local authorities which are party to the deal. The agreement below sets out the devolution proposal that it is agreed Leaders will take to each council for full debate by no later than the 1 July 2016. 2 APPENDIX 3 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Devolution Deal This document sets out the terms of a proposed agreement between Government, the seven local authorities covering Cambridgeshire and Peterborough and the Greater Cambridge Greater Peterborough Local Enterprise Partnership to devolve a range of funding, powers and responsibilities. It should be considered as part of the Government’s devolution to East Anglia. This Devolution Deal marks the next step in the transfer of resources, powers and accountability from central Government to Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. The document below sets out the current devolution proposal, which it is agreed leaders will take to each council for full debate and consultation with relevant local stakeholders. This process will be completed by no later than 1 st July. In return for this level of devolution and local control Cambridgeshire and Peterborough will establish a Combined Authority, with a directly elected Mayor in place by May 2017 with interim arrangements in place in 2016/17.
    [Show full text]