CMS for Canterbury 2015–2025, Volume 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CMS for Canterbury 2015–2025, Volume 1 CMS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Canterbury 20145–20245, Volume 1 REVISED DRAFT June November 20132014 Cover: Waimakariri River looking toward Shaler Range and Southern Alps/Kā Tiritiri o Te Moana Photo: Graeme Kates © Copyright June 2013, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1171-5391-10 This publication is produced using paper sourced from well-managed, renewable and legally logged forests. 1 Contents Foreword 445 Introduction 6 Purpose of conservation management strategies 6 CMS structure 78 Interpretation 8 CMS term 910 Relationship with other Department of Conservation strategic documents and tools 910 Relationship with other planning processes 1011 Legislative tools 1112 International obligations 1213 Part One 1314 1.1 The Department in Canterbury 1314 1.2 Vision for Canterbury—20642065 1314 1.3 Distinctive features, values and issues of Canterbury 1516 1.4 Treaty of Waitangi responsibilitiespartnership with Ngai Tahu 1820 1.5 Canterbury by 20242025 2528 Part Two—Places 39 2.1 National Parks Place 40 2.2 Braided Rivers / Ki Uta Ki Tai Place 43 2.3 Banks Peninsula (Horomaka)/ Te Pataka o Rakaihautu Place 51 2.4 Coastal Land and Marine / Ki Tai Place 63 2.5 Southern Conservation Parks Place 77 2.6 Northern High-Country Place 92 2.7 High-Country Basins Place 105 2.8 Foothill Forests Place 118 2.9 Christchurch City Place 124 Part Three—Specific policy requirements for Canterbury 129 General 129 Authorisations (general) 130 Vehicles 131 Motorised vehicles 132 Mountain bikes (non-motorised) 134 Electric power-assisted pedal cycles 135 Other means of transport 136 Canterbury Conservation Management Stategy 20142015–20242025 2 Watercraft 136 Aircraft 137 Animals 142 Dogs 142 Horses and pack animals 143 Structures and utilities 144 Private accommmodation and related facilities 145 Marine mammal viewing 148 Commercial eeling 148 Sports fish and game bird hunting 149 Grazing and farming 150 Mining 150 Sand and shingle extraction 151 Commercial filming and photography 152 Collection of materials 153 Wild animals 154 Game animals 156 Sporting and other competitive events 157 Recreation activities using fixed anchors 158 Fire management 160 Ski fields 161 Gemstone fossicking 161 Milestones 164 Part Four—Implementation, monitoring, reporting and review 165 Glossary 166 Appendices Appendix 1: 188 Work or activities of the Department of Conservation that may meet the requirements of section Section 4(3) of the Resource Management Act 1991 for exemptions from land use consents Appendix 2: 198 Important eEcosystems and habitats types within Canterbury Appendix 3: 223 Islands in Canterbury Appendix 4: 226 Priority ecosystem management sites units on public conservation lands and waters in Canterbury identified by the Department of Conservation through the nNatural hHeritage prioritising processesManagement System in February 2012 September 2013 Canterbury Conservation Management Stategy 20142015–20242025 3 Appendix 65: 265243 Threatened and at risk fFlora and fauna present in Canterbury Appendix 56: 281259 Threats or pPests and wild animals present in Canterbury Appendix 7: 302280 Nationally iIconic species in Canterbury Appendix 8: 303281 Marine habitats and ecosystems in Canterbury Appendix 9: 314292 Significant geological features, landforms and landscapes in Canterbury Appendix 10: 319297 Actively conserved historic places on public conservation landlands in Canterbury Appendix 11: 328306 Recreation destinations in Canterbury Appendix 12: 329307 Prescriptions for the management of visitor management zones Appendix 13: 333311 Prescriptions for the management of aircraft zones Appendix 134: 335313 Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement Act provisions relating to Canterbury Appendix 15: 356 List of conservation units and ecosystems within the Foothill Forests Place Appendix 146: 356334 Statement of outstanding universal value for Te Wāhipounamu—South West New Zealand World Heritage Area Appendix 1415: 360338 List of conservation units and ecosystems within the Foothill Forests Place Canterbury Conservation Management Stategy 20142015–20242025 4 Foreword [To be re-written for NZCA sign-off] This draft Canterbury Conservation Management Strategy (CMS) sets out the Department’s proposed intentions for the integrated management of natural and historic resources within Canterbury for the next 10 years. I would like to thank past and present members of the Canterbury Aoraki Conservation Board and all those who provided feedback and attended hui and workshops as this document was developed. Since the first Canterbury CMS was approved in 2000, there have been many conservation achievements in Canterbury. These include the Arawai Kākāriki programme at Ō Tü Wharekai, community projects for ecosystem restoration at Otamahua/Quail Island and recreation along the Motukarara-Little River Rail Trail, improved knowledge about braided river ecology from research by Project River Recovery, historic site interpretation at Godley Head, and the creation of the Pōhatu Marine Reserve and six conservation parks. There have also been serious conservation challenges—major ones being too many threatened species, and the increase in intensive agricultural land use and effects on freshwater ecosystems, which is ongoing. The development of this CMS comes at a time of increasing concerns about the effects of climate change and ongoing threats to indigenous biodiversity. The Department has recognised that to halt the ongoing decline of New Zealand’s natural heritage, we need to significantly increase our conservation effort by working more with others—iwi , communities, businesses and individuals. For the first time, this CMS integrates national and local conservation priorities at particular places and identifies desired outcomes for places that are special to communities and Ngāi Tahu. It also sets out a framework to increase conservation efforts over the next decade, recognising that DOC cannot do it alone. Canterbury is where I was raised, and where I’ve been Conservator for over a decade. There are many things that make conservation in Canterbury special to me. You too will have your own cherished natural places and conservation priorities—so check this draft CMS to see if they are mentioned. People in Canterbury have experienced serious disruption from the earthquakes over the past two years. These disruptions have also affected the Department with the result that we have not been able to undertake the level of public consultation we would have liked to in preparing this draft strategy. This makes your input now even more important. I ask then that you read this document, that you meet with Department staff to discuss your interests, and that you make a submission to help us develop a robust and enduring conservation strategy for Canterbury. Mike Cuddihy Conservator Canterbury Canterbury Conservation Management Stategy 20142015–20242025 5 Introduction Purpose of conservation management strategies Conservation, as defined under section 2 of the Conservation Act 1987 (the Act), is the ‘preservation and protection of natural and historic resources for the purpose of maintaining their intrinsic values, providing for their appreciation and recreational enjoyment by the public, and safeguarding the options of future generations’. The functions of the Department of Conservation (the Department) are for the most part identified in section 6 of the Act and in other Acts listed in the First Schedule of the Act. The purpose of a conservation management strategy (CMS), as defined by section 17D of the Act, is to implement statements of general policy, policies (including the Conservation General Policy 2005) and to establish objectives for the integrated management of natural and historic resources, including species managed by the Department of Conservation (the Department), and for recreation, tourism and other conservation purposes. The Act creates a hierarchy of documents to guide the Department in its management. The Act is at the top, the General Policy is next and below that are the CMS and conservation management plans, and other management plans. In Canterbury there are 10 14 operative conservation management plans1 operative conservation management plans including the Te Waihora Joint Management Plan (2005)2 and Molesworth Management Plan (2013). There are two operative national park management plans prepared under the National Parks Act 1980: for Aoraki/Mount Cook National Park and Arthur’s Pass National Park. Statutory framework for the management of public conservation lands and waters Conservation Act 1987 National Parks Act 1980 General Policy General Policy Conservation management strategies National park management plans Conservation management plans A lower order planning document cannot derogate from a higher order one; meaning it cannot be contrary to it. The lower in order a planning document is, the greater the level of detail as to management intentions. The general policies relevant to this strategy CMS are the: 1 Except for the Te Waihora Joint and Molesworth Management Plans, these plans are all reserve and Crown land management plans from the 1970s toand 19980s, and are intended to be revoked or withdrawn subsequent to this strategy’s approval. 2 Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and Department of Conservation. 2005: Te Waihora Joint Management Plan—Mahere Tukutahi o Te Waihora. Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and Department of Conservation, Christchurch. NB While the New Zealand Geographic Board name is “Lake Ellesmere (Te Waihora)” the CMS uses the abbreviation
Recommended publications
  • Form 990-PF 2013
    f' - Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation III- Do not enter Social Security numbers on this form as it may be made public. 2013 Department the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 1111- In formatio n about Form 990-PF and its se parate instructions is at www.irs. Jov/fom For calendar year 2013 or tax year beginning , 2013, and ending , 20 Name of foundation A Employer identification number THE AOTEAROA FOUNDATION 20-1464742 Number and street (or P 0 box number if mail is not delivered to street address ) Room/suite B Telephone number (see instructions) (212) 984 -5700 C/O DEBORAH A. RUTIGLIANO, 101 PARK AVENUE City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code q C If exemption application is ► pending , check here NEW YORK, NY 10178 G Check all that apply Initial return Initial return of a former public charity El D 1 Foreign organ iz ations , check here • ► Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organiz ations meeting the 85% test , check here and attach Address chan ge Name chang e computation . ► H Check type of organization X Section 501(c)( 3 ) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947 ( a)( 1 ) nonexem pt charitable trust Other taxable p rivate foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here . ► I Fair market value of all assets at J Accountin g method- - -X- -Cash- - - - - - Accrual- - - - - - - - - - - F the foundat ion50 is in a60.mec t ermination end of year (from Part ll, col.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2018 Climate Summary Information
    New Zealand Climate Summary: September 2018 Issued: 3 October 2018 A wet start to spring for some but dry for most Temperature Mean temperatures for September were near average (i.e. -0.50 to +0.50°C) across most of the country. Below average mean temperatures (i.e. -0.51 to -1.20°C) were restricted to eastern locations in Canterbury and Marlborough, as well as part of Northland, and other isolated patches in the North Island. Rainfall Rainfall was above normal (i.e. 120-149% of normal) to well above normal (i.e. >149% of normal) for eastern parts of the North Island as well as around Otago and Southland. Northland and Wellington experienced near normal rainfall totals (i.e. 80- 119% of normal) while much of the country experienced below normal (50-79% of normal) or well below normal (<50% of normal) rainfall levels. Soil Moisture As of 1 October 2018, soil moisture levels were above normal for the time of year for much of Otago, particularly toward the coast, as well as around coastal Gisborne. Drier than normal soil moistures were present from Nelson through to northern Canterbury and through much of the central and southern North Island. Soil moisture levels were generally near normal for the time of year across the rest of the country. Click on the link to jump to the information you require: Overview Rainfall Temperature September climate in the six main centres Highlights and extreme events Overview For the month as whole, September mean sea level pressure was lower than normal over and to the northeast of the North Island and higher than normal over and to the west of the South Island, resulting in more southeasterly winds than normal over the country.
    [Show full text]
  • A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand: Nelson/Marlborough
    A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand NELSON/MARLBOROUGH CONSERVANCY Farewell Spit (39) Location: 40o32'S, 172o50'E. At the northern extremity of Golden Bay and the northwestern extremity of South Island, 38 km from the town of Takaka, Tasman District. Area: 11,388 ha (land area c.1,961 ha; inter-tidal zone c.9,427 ha). Altitude: Sea level to 3 m. - 155 - A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand Overview: Farewell Spit is a classic recurved spit, approximately 30 km long, composed predominantly of uniform quartz sand derived from rivers draining westwards and transported northward by the westland current. The north is exposed to the Tasman Sea, but the south has extensive tidal mudflats. These provide feeding areas for large numbers of waterfowl. Some 95 species were recorded on the spit in March 1974, and more than 83 species of wetland birds are regularly recorded at the spit. The sand dunes provide habitat for a diverse and unusual plant community. Farewell Spit was listed as a wetland of international importance under the Ramsar Convention on 13 August 1976. Physical features: Farewell Spit is a classic recurved spit. The material forming the spit is derived from erosion of the Southern Alps and West Coast sea cliffs, transported northwards by a long-shore current. Since the estimated origin of the spit 6,500 years ago, an estimated 2.2 million cubic metres of sand have been deposited per annum. Wind transports more surface sand towards Golden Bay, although the majority of sand lies below the mean low water mark.
    [Show full text]
  • NIWA Lake Benmore Model Assessment Nutrient Load Effects
    Updated model assessment of the effects of increased nutrient loads into Lake Benmore Prepared for Environment Canterbury August 2015 Prepared by : Bob Spigel (NIWA) David Plew (NIWA) David Hamilton (University of Waikato) Donna Sutherland (NIWA) Clive Howard-Williams (NIWA) For any information regarding this report please contact: Bob Spigel Scientist Hydrodynamics +64-3-343 8020 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 8602 Riccarton Christchurch 8011 Phone +64 3 348 8987 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: CHC2015-089 Report date: August 2015 NIWA Project: ENC14506 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Sandy Elliot Approved for release John Quinn by: Ohau C Canal inflow entering Haldon Arm, Lake Benmore. [Donna Sutherland, NIWA] © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Extended summary ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Potts Lease Number
    Crown Pastoral Land Tenure Review Lease name : Mt Potts Lease number : Pc 143 Conservation resources report As part of the process of tenure review, advice on significant inherent values within the pastoral lease is provided by Department of Conservation officials in the form of a conservation resources report. This report is the result of outdoor survey and inspection. It is a key piece of information for the development of a preliminary consultation document. The report attached is released under the Official Information Act 1982. Copied June 2003 RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT CONTENTS PART 1: Introduction.............................................................. 1 PART 2: Inherent Values......................................................... 2 2.1 Landscape.......................................................... 2 2.2 Landforms and Geology.................................... 7 2.3 Climate.............................................................. 8 2.4 Vegetation......................................................... 8 2.4.1 Original Vegetation............................... 8 2.4.2 Indigenous Plant Communities............. 9 2.4.3 Notable Flora....................................... 14 2.4.4 Problem Plants.....................................14 2.5 Fauna .............................................................15 2.5.1 Birds and Reptiles ............................... 15 2.5.2 Freshwater Fauna................................ 19 2.5.3 Invertebrates........................................ 21 2.5.4 Notable
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Phenetic and Cladistic Analysis of the Genus Holcaspis Chaudoir (Coleoptera: .Carabidae)
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. A COMPARATIVE PHENETIC AND CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE GENUS HOLCASPIS CHAUDOIR (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) ********* A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Yupa Hanboonsong ********* Lincoln University 1994 Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. A comparative phenetic and cladistic analysis of the genus Holcaspis Chaudoir (Coleoptera: .Carabidae) by Yupa Hanboonsong The systematics of the endemic New Zealand carabid genus Holcaspis are investigated, using phenetic and cladistic methods, to construct phenetic and phylogenetic relationships. Three different character data sets: morphological, allozyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are used to estimate the relationships. Cladistic and morphometric analyses are undertaken on adult morphological characters. Twenty six external morphological characters, including male and female genitalia, are used for cladistic analysis. The results from the cladistic analysis are strongly congruent with previous publications. The morphometric analysis uses multivariate discriminant functions, with 18 morphometric variables, to derive a phenogram by clustering from Mahalanobis distances (D2) of the discrimination analysis using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetical averages (UPGMA).
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Rock Climbing Safety Using a Systems Engineering Approach
    Lyle Halliday u5366214 Improving Rock Climbing Safety using a Systems Engineering Approach ENGN2225- Systems Engineering and Design, Portfolio Abstract This portfolio outlines an application of Systems Engineering methods to the sport of Rock climbing. The report outlines an organized, logical analysis of the system that is involved in making this sport safe and aims to improve the system as a whole through this analysis. Steps taken include system scoping, requirements engineering, system function definition, subsystem integration and system attributes which contribute toward a final concept. Two recommendations are made, one being a bouldering mat which incorporates the transportation of other equipment, the other being complete, standardised bolting protocols. These concepts are then verified against the design criteria and evaluated. 1.0 System scoping: A systematic way of establishing the boundaries of the project and focusing the design problem to an attainable goal. The project focuses on Lead Climbing. 2.0 Requirements engineering: Establishing the true requirements of climbers, and what they search for in a climbing safety system 2.1 Pairwise Analysis: Establishing safety, ease of use and durability as primary design goals 2.2 Design Requirements and Technical Performance Measures: Specifying the design requirements into attainable engineering parameters. 2.3 House of Quality: Identifying the trade-offs between safety and functionality/ cost and the need for a whole-of-systems approach to the problem, rather than a component approach. 3.0 System Function Definition: Establishing concepts and system processes. 3.1 Concept Generation and Classification: Identifying possible and existing solutions on a component level and taking these to a subsystem level.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Route to Twizel
    AORAKI/MT COOK WHITE HORSE HILL CAMPGROUND MOUNT COOK VILLAGE BURNETT MOUNTAINS MOUNT COOK AIRPORT TASMAN POINT Tasman Valley Track FRED’S STREAM TASMAN RIVER JOLLIE RIVER SH80 Jollie Carpark Braemar-Mount Cook Station Rd GLENTANNER PARK CENTRE LAKE PUKAKI LAKE TEKAPO 54KM LANDSLIP CREEK ALTERNATIVE ROUTE TO TWIZEL TAKAPÕ LAKE TEKAPO MT JOHN OBSERVATORY BRAEMAR ROAD TAKAPŌ/LAKE TEKAPO Tekapo Powerhouse Rd TEKAPO A POWER STATION SH8 3km Hayman Rd Tekapo Canal Rd PATTERSONS PONDS TEKAPO CANAL 9km 15km 24km Tekapo Canal Rd LAKE PUKAKI SALMON FARM TEKAPO RIVER TEKAPO B POWER STATION Hayman Road 30km Lakeside Dr TAKAPŌ/LAKE TEKAPO 35km Tek Church of the apo-Twizel Rd Good Shepherd 8 MARY RANGES Dog Monument SALMONFA RM TO SALMON SHOP SH80 TEKAPO RIVER SH8 r s D 44km e r r C e i e Pi g n on SALMON SHOP n Roto Pl o RUATANIWHA i e a e P r r D CONSERVATION PARK o r A Scott Pond STARTING POINT PUKAKI CANAL SH8 Aorangi Cres 8 8 F Rd Lakeside airlie kapo -Te Car Park PUKAKI RIVER Lochinvar Ave Allan St Lilybank Rd Glen Lyon Rd r D n o P l Glen Lyon Rd ilt ollock P Andrew Don Dr am Old Glen Lyon Rd H N Pukaki Flats Track Rise TWIZEL 54km Murray Pl Rankin PUKAKI FLATS OHAU CANAL LAKE RUATANIWHA SH8KEY: Fitness Easy Traffic Low 800 TEKAPO TWIZEL Onroad left onto Hayman Rd and ride to the Off-road trail 700 start of the off-road Trail on your right Skill Easy Grade 2 Information Centre 35km which follows the Lake Pukaki 600 Picnic Area shoreline.
    [Show full text]
  • Canterbury Conservation Management Strategy
    Canterbury Conservation Management Strategy Volume 1 Published by Department of Conservation/Te Papa Atawhai Private Bag 4715 Christchurch New Zealand First published 2000 Canterbury Conservation Management Planning Series No. 10 ISSN: 1171-5391-10 ISBN: 0-478-01991-2 Foreword Canterbury is rich in its variety of indigenous plants and animals, its historic heritage and relics, and its landscapes. Its physical features are dramatic, ranging from the majestic Southern Alps to the Canterbury Plains, from forested foothills to rocky coastlines and sandy beaches. These features also provide a wealth of recreational opportunities. The Department of Conservation’s Canterbury Conservancy is responsible for some 1293 units of land, and for the protection of important natural resources generally. To help manage these resources and activities the Conservancy, in consultation with the then North Canterbury and Aoraki Conservation Boards, has prepared a Conservation Management Strategy (CMS). The CMS sets out the management directions the Conservancy will take for the next ten years, the objectives it wants to achieve and the means by which it will achieve these. The draft CMS was released for public comment on 18 November 1995. Submissions closed on 1 April 1996, and 174 were received. Public oral submissions were heard in May and June of 1996. Consultation with Ngäi Tahu Papatipu Rünanga occurred from July to December 1996, and with Te Rünanga o Ngäi Tahu from July 1996 to May 1997. A summary of submissions and a decision schedule indicating the extent of acceptance of all submissions was prepared and given full consideration in revising the draft CMS. The revised draft CMS and summary of submissions was presented to the Conservation Boards for their consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology Project Reports of Cleardale Station and Taniwha Farm, Rakaia Gorge, Canterbury, New Zealand
    Conservation biology project reports of Cleardale Station and Taniwha Farm, Rakaia Gorge, Canterbury, New Zealand Edited by Nick Dickinson & Mike Bowie Lincoln University Wildlife Management Report No. 73 2020 ©Department of Pest-management & Conservation, Lincoln University ISSN: 1179-7738 ISBN: 978-0-86476-451-5 Lincoln University Wildlife Management Report No. 73 September 2020 Conservation biology project reports of Cleardale Station and Taniwha Farm, Rakaia Gorge, Canterbury, New Zealand Cleardale Station looking towards Rakaia River (Photo: Tanmayi Pagadala) Edited by Nick Dickinson and Mike Bowie Department of Pest-management & Conservation, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln 7647 Email:[email protected] i Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................v List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... vi Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 Cleardale and Taniwha Stations ............................................................................................... 2 : Habitat Preference of Birds ................................................................................... 3 Fraser Gurney Abstract ...............................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA GUIDE 2018 Englisch
    CON 1. WELCOME NOTE ////////////////////////////////////// TENTS ////// ////////////////// ////////////////// Dear media representatives, 1. Welc ome Note Welcome to adidas ROCKSTARS 2018! We are thrilled to host the eighth edition of our interna - 2. tional bouldering invitational at Stuttgart’s beautiful Porsche-Arena, one of the most modern General In 02 sports arenas in Europe. formation 3. for the Me Schedule dia 04 This year’s event sees over 70 top class athletes from over 20 different countries including 4. multiple Bouldering World Champions, the overall winners and top athletes of the 2018 Boul - adidas ROC 07 dering World Cup, the two-time overall champion and current front-runner of the Lead World KSTARS 4.1 Cup, the two reigning European Bouldering Champions as well as the four-time World Champion General In 08 Combined (Boulder/Lead/Speed). You can look forward to a stellar season finale! formatio 4.2 n Prize Mon 08 When we first came up with the idea for adidas ROCKSTARS, nearly every single athlete we ey talked to mentioned that the best competitions are the ones with a great atmosphere and 4.3 Hea d Referee 13 good music. That input encouraged us to implement our idea of combining ‘climbing’ with 4 ‘music’ live on stage. This year, world-famous MC & Beatboxer DJ Eklips from Paris will heat .4 Regul ations (Abs 12 up the crowds during the final together with extreme sports DJs Chainsaw and Sungod. The 4 tract) renowned American rock climber and hobby dj Dave Graham, who was the fourth person to .5 Partic ipating Cou 19 send Wolfgang Güllich’s legendary route ‘Action Directe (the world’s first 9a), will be spinning ntries the tunes at the after party.
    [Show full text]
  • Recco® Detectors Worldwide
    RECCO® DETECTORS WORLDWIDE ANDORRA Krimml, Salzburg Aflenz, ÖBRD Steiermark Krippenstein/Obertraun, Aigen im Ennstal, ÖBRD Steiermark Arcalis Oberösterreich Alpbach, ÖBRD Tirol Arinsal Kössen, Tirol Althofen-Hemmaland, ÖBRD Grau Roig Lech, Tirol Kärnten Pas de la Casa Leogang, Salzburg Altausee, ÖBRD Steiermark Soldeu Loser-Sandling, Steiermark Altenmarkt, ÖBRD Salzburg Mayrhofen (Zillertal), Tirol Axams, ÖBRD Tirol HELICOPTER BASES & SAR Mellau, Vorarlberg Bad Hofgastein, ÖBRD Salzburg BOMBERS Murau/Kreischberg, Steiermark Bischofshofen, ÖBRD Salzburg Andorra La Vella Mölltaler Gletscher, Kärnten Bludenz, ÖBRD Vorarlberg Nassfeld-Hermagor, Kärnten Eisenerz, ÖBRD Steiermark ARGENTINA Nauders am Reschenpass, Tirol Flachau, ÖBRD Salzburg Bariloche Nordkette Innsbruck, Tirol Fragant, ÖBRD Kärnten La Hoya Obergurgl/Hochgurgl, Tirol Fulpmes/Schlick, ÖBRD Tirol Las Lenas Pitztaler Gletscher-Riffelsee, Tirol Fusch, ÖBRD Salzburg Penitentes Planneralm, Steiermark Galtür, ÖBRD Tirol Präbichl, Steiermark Gaschurn, ÖBRD Vorarlberg AUSTRALIA Rauris, Salzburg Gesäuse, Admont, ÖBRD Steiermark Riesneralm, Steiermark Golling, ÖBRD Salzburg Mount Hotham, Victoria Saalbach-Hinterglemm, Salzburg Gries/Sellrain, ÖBRD Tirol Scheffau-Wilder Kaiser, Tirol Gröbming, ÖBRD Steiermark Schiarena Präbichl, Steiermark Heiligenblut, ÖBRD Kärnten AUSTRIA Schladming, Steiermark Judenburg, ÖBRD Steiermark Aberg Maria Alm, Salzburg Schoppernau, Vorarlberg Kaltenbach Hochzillertal, ÖBRD Tirol Achenkirch Christlum, Tirol Schönberg-Lachtal, Steiermark Kaprun, ÖBRD Salzburg
    [Show full text]