DOCSLIB.ORG

NIWA Lake Benmore Model Assessment Nutrient Load Effects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NIWA Lake Benmore Model Assessment Nutrient Load Effects Updated model assessment of the effects of increased nutrient loads into Lake Benmore Prepared for Environment Canterbury August 2015 Prepared by : Bob Spigel (NIWA) David Plew (NIWA) David Hamilton (University of Waikato) Donna Sutherland (NIWA) Clive Howard-Williams (NIWA) For any information regarding this report please contact: Bob Spigel Scientist Hydrodynamics +64-3-343 8020 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 8602 Riccarton Christchurch 8011 Phone +64 3 348 8987 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: CHC2015-089 Report date: August 2015 NIWA Project: ENC14506 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Sandy Elliot Approved for release John Quinn by: Ohau C Canal inflow entering Haldon Arm, Lake Benmore. [Donna Sutherland, NIWA] © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Extended summary ............................................................................................................. 6 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 12 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Scope of Work ......................................................................................................... 13 2 Methods .................................................................................................................. 17 2.1 The models .............................................................................................................. 17 2.2 Input data................................................................................................................ 19 2.3 Model configuration and calibration ...................................................................... 33 2.4 Scenario nutrient loads ........................................................................................... 34 2.5 Modelling strategy .................................................................................................. 43 3 Results .................................................................................................................... 45 3.1 Validation of model ................................................................................................ 45 3.2 Modelling TLI and its components – Chl-a, TN, TP ................................................. 53 3.3 Scenario testing ...................................................................................................... 56 4 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 59 4.1 Model uncertainty .................................................................................................. 59 4.2 Concern over matching with in-lake parameters ................................................... 59 4.3 Indications of nutrient limitation ............................................................................ 59 4.4 TLI simulations ........................................................................................................ 60 4.5 Land-use changes and nutrient input loads............................................................ 60 4.6 Final comments ....................................................................................................... 61 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 62 6 References ............................................................................................................... 63 7 Glossary of abbreviations and terms ........................................................................ 65 Appendix A Nutrient concentration vs stream discharge into Lake Benmore ........ 66 Appendix B Inflow sampling and laboratory validation of the Ahuriri Arm ........... 73 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 73 Methods ............................................................................................................................ 73 Updated model assessment of the effects of increased nutrient loads into Lake Benmore Results ............................................................................................................................... 76 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 77 Appendix C TLI values in 2008-09 (from Norton et al. 2009) ................................. 78 Appendix D CAEDYM derived nutrient limitation functions for diatoms ............... 80 Appendix E Remote sensing of vegetation adjacent to Ahuriri Arm ...................... 84 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 84 Method .............................................................................................................................. 84 Study site ........................................................................................................................... 85 Results and Discussion ...................................................................................................... 85 Potential for further analyses ........................................................................................... 91 Reference .......................................................................................................................... 91 Tables Table 2-1: Nitrogen loads calculated for the model. 36 Table 2-2: Phosphorus loads calculated for the model. 38 Table 3-1: Lake Benmore - Baseline conditions. 56 Table 3-2: Lake Benmore modelled TLIs for Scenarios 2011-13. 57 Figures Figure 2-1: 400 m x 400 m model grid used for the Lake Benmore model application. 18 Figure 2-2: Inflows into the Haldon Arm from 2011 to 2013. 23 Figure 2-3: Gauged inflow into the Ahuriri Arm and ungauged inflow into the Ahuriri and Haldon Arms from 2011 to 2013. 24 Figure 2-4: Nitrogen species concentrations in the inflow and lake sites for the Ahuriri Arm from 2011-2013. 25 Figure 2-5: Nitrogen species concentrations in the inflow and lake sites for the Ahuriri Arm from 2011-2013. 26 Figure 2-6: Phosphorus species concentrations in the inflow and lake sites for the Ahuriri Arm from 2011-2013. 27 Figure 2-7: Phosphorus species concentrations in the inflow and lake sites for the Ahuriri Arm from 2011-2013. 28 Figure 2-8: Nitrogen species concentrations in the inflow and lake sites for the Haldon Arm from 2011-2013. 29 Figure 2-9: Nitrogen species concentrations in the inflow and lake sites for the Haldon Arm from 2011-2013. 30 Figure 2-10: Phosphorus species concentrations in the inflow and lake sites for the Haldon Arm from 2011-2013. 31 Figure 2-11: Phosphorus species concentrations in the inflow and lake sites for the Haldon Arm from 2011-2013. 32 Updated model assessment of the effects of increased nutrient loads into Lake Benmore Figure 2-12: Locations of water quality flows and loads used in the CLUES model (green circles). 35 Figure 3-1: Simulated (lines) and observed (dots) values for Chlorophyll-a, TN, NO 3-N, NH 4- N, TP and PO 4 at three depths in the Haldon Arm. 47 Figure 3-2: Simulated (lines) and observed (dots) values for POC, DOC, PON, DON, POP, DOP at three depths in the Haldon Arm. 48 Figure 3-3: Simulated (lines) and observed (dots) values for Chlorophyll-a, TN, NO 3-N, NH 4- N, TP and PO 4 at three depths in the Ahuriri Arm. 49 Figure 3-4: Simulated (lines) and observed (dots) values for POC, DOC, PON, DON, POP, DOP at three depths in the Ahuriri Arm. 50 Figure 3-5: Simulated (lines) and observed (dots) values for Chlorophyll-a, TN, NO 3-N, NH 4- N, TP and PO 4 at three depths in the Lower Benmore Basin. 51 Figure 3-6: Simulated (lines) and observed (dots) values for POC, DOC, PON, DON, POP, DOP at three depths in the Lower Benmore Basin. 52 Figure 3-8: Trophic Lake Index (Mean TLI) in 2011-13 calculated for summer in the Ahuriri Arm (Left Panel) and the Haldon Arm (Right Panel). 55 Figure 3-9: 3-D representations of the N and P loads in the different scenarios versus simulated TLI values. 58 fa Figure A-1: Correlation of phosphorus concentration and flow in the Ahuriri River. 66 Figure A-2: Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) species concentrations versus flow in the Ahuriri River. 67 Figure A-3: Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) species concentrations versus flow in the Ohau C Canal. 68 Figure A-4: Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) species concentrations versus flow in the Tekapo-Pukaki River. 69 Figure A-5: Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) species concentrations versus flow in the Tekapo-Pukaki River. 70 Figure A-6: Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) & particulate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FT6 Aviemore
    GEOSCIENCES 09 Annual Conference Oamaru, NZ FIELD TRIP 6 AVIEMORE – A DAM OF TWO HALVES Wednesday 25 November 2009 Authors: D.J.A Barrell, S.A.L. Read, R.J. Van Dissen, D.F. Macfarlane, J. Walker, U. Rieser Leaders: David Barrell, Stuart Read & Russ Van Dissen GNS Science, Dunedin and Avalon BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE: Barrell, D.J.A., Read, S.A.L., Van Dissen, R.J., Macfarlane, D.F., Walker, J., Rieser, U. (2009). Aviemore – a dam of two halves. Unpublished field trip guide for "Geosciences 09", the joint annual conference of the Geological Society of New Zealand and the New Zealand Geophysical Society, Oamaru, November 2009. 30 p. AVIEMORE - A DAM OF TWO HALVES D.J.A Barrell 1, S.A.L. Read 2, R.J. Van Dissen 2, D.F. Macfarlane 3, J. Walker 4, U. Rieser 5 1 GNS Science, Dunedin 2 GNS Science, Lower Hutt 3 URS New Zealand Ltd, Christchurch 4 Meridian Energy, Christchurch 5 School of Geography, Environment & Earth Sciences, Victoria Univ. of Wellington ********************** Trip Leaders: David Barrell, Stuart Read & Russ Van Dissen 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview This excursion provides an overview of the geology and tectonics of the Waitaki valley, including some features of its hydroelectric dams. The excursion highlight is Aviemore Dam, constructed in the 1960s across a major fault, the subsequent (mid-1990s – early 2000s) discovery and quantification of late Quaternary displacement on this fault and the resulting engineering mitigation of the dam foundation fault displacement hazard. The excursion provides insights to the nature and expression of faults in the Waitaki landscape, and the character and ages of the Waitaki alluvial terrace sequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming in North Otago
    FARMING IN NORTH OTAGO J. D. CURRIE Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Oarnaru Abstract North Otago is a well-established, efficiently farmed district. Primary production, which grossed an estimated $20 million in the 1973-4 season, will continue to be the major source of regional revenue. The geographic character and the soil resources of the district are described with a comprehensive coverage of historical development, current farming practices and future opportunities for pastoral development. The principal factor limiting agriculture in North Otago is a climate characterized by low, variable rainfall. Pastoral potential is closely tied to investment in oversowing, lucerne and irrigation. Successful farming under difhcult environmental conditions demands above-average ability. The managerial skill of North Otago’s farmers is an outstanding regional resource that augurs well for the future. GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION NORTH OTAGO is a well-defined region. The northern, Canterbury, boundary follows the Waitaki River to its snowfield source in the Southern Alps beyond Lake Ohau. Above Kurow are the hydro dams, below Kurow the river remains as a broad natural boundary, flowing in swift braided channels down a bouldery bed to the sea. The southern boundary that isolates North Otago from its parent province is a mountain wall running north-west from Shag Point to the Lindis Pass and on to the Alps. A fork in the mountains that sweep round from Danseys Pass to Kurow divides North Otago into two districts that are distinct in nature and development. Inland, at Omarama, the sparsely populated run country is similar to Central Otago. Below Kurow is the more closely settled country, The moun- tains and foothills are only suited to extensive grazing, but most of the lower country is made up of rolling loessial downs, good natural grassland, much of it arable.
    [Show full text]
  • Alps 2 Ocean Cycle Trail Visitor Survey 2020
    LEAP Research Report No. 52 Alps 2 Ocean Cycle Trail Visitor Survey 2020 Lena Mkwara David Simmons Geoffrey Kerr November 2020 Alps 2 Ocean Cycle Trail Visitor Survey 2020 Lena Mkwara David Simmons Geoffrey Kerr Land Environment and People Research Report Report No. 52 November 2020 ISSN 1172-0859 (Print) ISSN 1172-0891 (PDF) ISBN 978-0-86476-452-2 (Print) ISBN 978-0-86476-455-3 (PDF) Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand Abstract This report presents the findings from a 2020 survey of Alps 2 Ocean Cycle Trail (A2O) cyclists. COVID-19 cancelled fieldwork before data collection was complete. The limited data indicate that cyclists are extremely satisfied with the A2O and associated services, and make substantial expenditures associated with their ride. The A2O was a strong attractant to cyclists, the large majority of whom would not have visited the districts in the absence of the trail. Keywords A2O Cycle Trail, tourist attractions, tourism spending, economic attribution model, Mackenzie District, Waitaki District Acknowledgements This project benefitted immensely from the contributions of others. We wish to thank the following people for their generosity and assistance. Waitaki District Council, Tourism Waitaki and Cycle Journeys for their guidance and support. Accommodation providers and visitor centre operators who assisted with the distribution of survey cards. Lincoln University colleagues who peer reviewed the survey instrument. Dr Sally Driml, University of Queensland, for peer review of the survey instrument and the economic attribution model. Dr Yvonne Mathews, University of Waikato/Waikato Regional Council, for structuring the interactive mapping inputs. Dr Bentry Mkwara for GIS mapping assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Active Fault and Fold Hazards in the Twizel Area, Mackenzie District, South Canterbury Report No
    Assessment of active fault and fold hazards in the Twizel area, Mackenzie District, South Canterbury Report No. R10/25 ISBN 978-1-877542-91-6 Prepared for Environment Canterbury by DJA Barrell GNS Science Consultancy May 2010 Report R10/25 ISBN 978-1-877542-91-6 58 Kilmore Street PO Box 345 Christchurch 8140 Phone (03) 365 3828 Fax (03) 365 3194 75 Church Street PO Box 550 Timaru 7940 Phone (03) 687 7800 Fax (03) 687 7808 Website: www.ecan.govt.nz Customer Services Phone 0800 324 636 Assessment of active fault and fold hazards in the Twizel area, Mackenzie District, South Canterbury D.J.A. Barrell GNS Science Consultancy Report 2010/040 Environment Canterbury Report No. R10/25 May 2010 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science) exclusively for and under contract to Environment Canterbury (ECan). Unless otherwise agreed in writing by GNS Science, GNS Science accepts no responsibility for any use of, or reliance on, any contents of this report by any person other than ECan and shall not be liable to any person other than ECan, on any ground, for any loss, damage or expense arising from such use or reliance. The data presented in this report are available to GNS Science for other use from May 2010 BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Barrell, D.J.A. 2010. Assessment of active fault and fold hazards in the Twizel area, Mackenzie District, South Canterbury. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2010/040. 22 p. © Environment Canterbury Report No. R10/25 ISBN 978-1-877542-91-6 Project Number: 440W1435 2010 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................II 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Project River Recovery Bibliography
    Project River Recovery bibliography 1991–July 2007 CANTERBURY SERIES 0208 Project River Recovery bibliography 1991 – JULY 2007 Project River Recovery Report 2007/02 Susan Anderson Department of Conservation, Private Bag, Twizel July 2007 Docdm-171819 - PRR Bibliography 2 INTRODUCTION Since its inception in 1991, Project River Recovery has undertaken or funded numerous research projects. The results of these investigations have been reported in various reports, theses, Department of Conservation publications, and scientific papers. Results of all significant research have been published, can be found through literature searches, and are widely available. Internal reports that do not warrant publication are held at the Twizel Te Manahuna Area Office and at the main Department of Conservation library in Wellington. All unpublished Project River Recovery reports produced since 1998 have been assigned report numbers. In addition to reports on original research, Project River Recovery has produced magazine articles and newspaper feature articles, various annual reports, progress reports, discussion documents, and plans. It has also commissioned some reports from consultants. This bibliography updates the bibliography compiled in 2000 (Sanders 2000) and lists all reports, theses, diplomas, Department of Conservation publications, and scientific papers that were produced or supported by Project River Recovery between 1991 and July 2007. It does not list brochures, posters, fact sheets, newsletters, abstracts for conference programmes, or minor magazine or newspaper articles. Docdm-171819 - PRR Bibliography 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, L.K. 1995: Reintroduction of juvenile black stilts to the wild. Unpublished MSc thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch. 108 p. Anderson, S.J. 2006: Proposal for black-fronted tern nest monitoring and predator trapping at the Ruataniwha Wetlands: 2006-2007 breeding season.
    [Show full text]
  • General Distribution and Characteristics of Active Faults and Folds in the Mackenzie District, South Canterbury D.J.A
    General distribution and characteristics of active faults and folds in the Mackenzie District, South Canterbury D.J.A. Barrell D.T. Strong GNS Science Consultancy Report 2010/147 Environment Canterbury Report No. R10/44 June 2010 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science) exclusively for and under contract to Environment Canterbury. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by GNS Science, GNS Science accepts no responsibility for any use of, or reliance on, any contents of this report by any person other than Environment Canterbury and shall not be liable to any person other than Environment Canterbury, on any ground, for any loss, damage or expense arising from such use or reliance. The data presented in this report are available to GNS Science for other use from June 2010 BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Barrell, D.J.A., Strong, D.T. 2010. General distribution and characteristics of active faults and folds in the Mackenzie District, South Canterbury. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2010/147. 22 p. © Environment Canterbury Report No. R10/44 ISBN 978-1-877574-18-4 Project Number: 440W1435 2010 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................II 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1 2. INFORMATION SOURCES .........................................................................................2 3. GEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ohau Lodge to Omarama
    SH80 km SECTION 4: Lake Ohau Lodge to Omarama 40 SH8 FITNESS: Intermediate SKILL:Intermediate TRAFFIC: Low GRADE: 3 PUKAKI CANAL 4 LAKE OHAU LODGE Ben Ohau Rd Glen Lyon Rd SKIFIELD CREEK Glen Lyon Rd BEN OHAU Manuka Tce LAKE OHAU Old Glen Lyon Rd PARSONS CREEK TWIZEL 3 Lake Ohau Max Smith Dr SAWYERS CREEK Rd Glen LyonOHAU Road CANAL FREEHOLD CREEK LAKE OHAU VILLAGE OHAU RIVER OHAU WEIR FLOOD ROUTE Tambrae Track LAKE RUATANIWHA LAKE MIDDLETON SH8 OHAU WEIR Lake Ohau Track Maori Swamp High Point Lake Ohau Rd HISTORIC WOOLSHED Quailburn Rd N LEVEL 1000 BENMORE RANGE 800 SH8 AORAKI/MOUNT COOK AORAKI/MOUNT LAKE OHAU LODGE LAKE OHAU 600 BRAEMAR STATION TWIZEL OMARAMA 400 OTEMATATA KUROW Quailburn Rd 200 DUNTROON OAMARU 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 Henburn Rd KEY: Onroad Off-road trail Ohau Weir flood route Picnic Area Prohibition Rd AHURIRI RIVER 0 1 2 3 4 5km CLAY CLIFFS Scale OMARAMA 5 www.alps2ocean.com SH83 SH8 Map current as of 24/9/13 Starting from the Lake Ohau Lodge descent to Quailburn Road [18.3km]. to see the Clay Cliffs (14km return). driveway, the trail traverses the lower From the Quailburn Road intersection you When Quailburn Road meets the slopes of the Ruataniwha Conservation can detour 2km to the historic woolshed highway [35.6km], the off-road trail winds Park, with stunning views back across the at the end of Quailburn Road (where alongside below the highway edge. basin to the Benmore Range.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Route to Twizel
    AORAKI/MT COOK WHITE HORSE HILL CAMPGROUND MOUNT COOK VILLAGE BURNETT MOUNTAINS MOUNT COOK AIRPORT TASMAN POINT Tasman Valley Track FRED’S STREAM TASMAN RIVER JOLLIE RIVER SH80 Jollie Carpark Braemar-Mount Cook Station Rd GLENTANNER PARK CENTRE LAKE PUKAKI LAKE TEKAPO 54KM LANDSLIP CREEK ALTERNATIVE ROUTE TO TWIZEL TAKAPÕ LAKE TEKAPO MT JOHN OBSERVATORY BRAEMAR ROAD TAKAPŌ/LAKE TEKAPO Tekapo Powerhouse Rd TEKAPO A POWER STATION SH8 3km Hayman Rd Tekapo Canal Rd PATTERSONS PONDS TEKAPO CANAL 9km 15km 24km Tekapo Canal Rd LAKE PUKAKI SALMON FARM TEKAPO RIVER TEKAPO B POWER STATION Hayman Road 30km Lakeside Dr TAKAPŌ/LAKE TEKAPO 35km Tek Church of the apo-Twizel Rd Good Shepherd 8 MARY RANGES Dog Monument SALMONFA RM TO SALMON SHOP SH80 TEKAPO RIVER SH8 r s D 44km e r r C e i e Pi g n on SALMON SHOP n Roto Pl o RUATANIWHA i e a e P r r D CONSERVATION PARK o r A Scott Pond STARTING POINT PUKAKI CANAL SH8 Aorangi Cres 8 8 F Rd Lakeside airlie kapo -Te Car Park PUKAKI RIVER Lochinvar Ave Allan St Lilybank Rd Glen Lyon Rd r D n o P l Glen Lyon Rd ilt ollock P Andrew Don Dr am Old Glen Lyon Rd H N Pukaki Flats Track Rise TWIZEL 54km Murray Pl Rankin PUKAKI FLATS OHAU CANAL LAKE RUATANIWHA SH8KEY: Fitness Easy Traffic Low 800 TEKAPO TWIZEL Onroad left onto Hayman Rd and ride to the Off-road trail 700 start of the off-road Trail on your right Skill Easy Grade 2 Information Centre 35km which follows the Lake Pukaki 600 Picnic Area shoreline.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Tekapo to Twizel Highlights
    AORAKI/MT COOK WHITE HORSE HILL CAMPGROUND MOUNT COOK VILLAGE BURNETT MOUNTAINS MOUNT COOK AIRPORT TASMAN POINT Tasman Valley Track FRED’S STREAM TASMAN RIVER JOLLIE RIVER SH80 Jollie Carpark Braemar-Mount Cook Station Rd 800 TEKAPO TWIZEL 700 54km ALTERNATIVEGLENTANNER PARK CENTRE ROUTE: Lake Tekapo to Twizel 600 LANDSLIP CREEK ELEVATION Fitness: Easy • Skill: Easy • Traffic: Low • Grade: 2 500 400 KM LAKE PUKAKI 0 10 20 30 40 50 MT JOHN OBSERVATORY LAKE TEKAPO BRAEMAR ROAD Tekapo Powerhouse Rd LAKE TEKAPO TEKAPO A POWER STATION SH8 3km TRAIL GUARDIAN Hayman Rd SALMON FARM TO SALMON SHOP Tekapo Canal Rd PATTERSONS PONDS 9km TEKAPO CANAL 15km Tekapo Canal Rd LAKE PUKAKI SALMON FARM 24km TEKAPO RIVER TEKAPO B POWER STATION Hayman Road LAKE TEKAPO 30km Lakeside Dr Te kapo-Twizel Rd Church of the 8 Good Shepherd Dog Monument MARY RANGES SH80 35km r s D TEKAPO RIVERe SH8 r r 44km C e i e Pi g n on n Roto Pl o i e a e P SALMON SHOP r r D o r A Scott Pond Aorangi Cres 8 PUKAKI CANAL SH8 F Rd airlie-Tekapo PUKAKI RIVER Allan St Glen Lyon Rd Glen Lyon Rd LAKE TEKAPO Andrew Don Dr Old Glen Lyon Rd Pukaki Flats Track Murray Pl TWIZEL PUKAKI FLATS Mapwww.alps2ocean.com current as of 28/7/17 N 54km OHAU CANAL LAKE RUATANIWHA 0 1 2 3 4 5km KEY: Onroad Off-road trail SH8 Scale The alternative route begins in the at the Mt Cook Alpine Salmon shop 44km . You then cross the Tekapo township near the police highway and follow the trail across Pukaki Flats – an expansive Highlights: station.
    [Show full text]
  • Omarama Gazette September 4, 2019.Pub
    -Omarama Gazette - September 2019 Sabrina's taking us to the skies Not only has she adopted this place as her own, but she is determined to take our name to the skies. Last month, German -born glider pilot Sabrina Schels set a new New Zealand women’s gliding record for speed over a 100km out -and -return task, with a best speed of 171.77 km/h. And on Tuesday she had confirmation she has cracked the 200km out and back record. But she has her horizons set even higher. “I hope to break some important New Zealand records,” she says in that pragmatic way of hers. But then sheer enthusiasm ripples to the surface. “I want to show the world that New Zealand is a superb gliding country. I’m going to fly for New Zealand. New Zealand is my home and I want to give something back.” She has her sights set on gliding records not yet attempted by female pilots. “I want to fill the gaps.” In gliding, women are permitted to challenge men’s records. “Which is really quite cool.” Her aim next is to gain the appropriate licences to do this, meaning all records she sets will be flown for New Zealand. Originally from Bavaria, Germany, Sabrina trained as an environmental engineer before coming to New Zealand and to flying school in Omarama, in 2015. She gained her residency about two years ago and works as a flying instructor for Glide Omarama. She and partner Dan McCormack oversee Glide Omarama’s winter Continued from page one flying programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch to Lake Tekapo
    Day 1: Christchurch to Lake Tekapo We stay along this lake in Tekapo. Day Plan Kia Ora and welcome to New Zealand! We begin our South Island tour in its biggest city. Often referred to as the 'Garden City', Christchurch is characterised by wide tree-lined avenues, beautifully maintained gardens, ambling inner-city rivers and restored heritage buildings. Your day begins with an orientation tour of Christchurch’s surrounding area. Unfortunately the earthquakes of September 2010 and February 2011 have damaged many buildings, including the iconic cathedral - but the city is in the re-build stage and things look optimistic for its future. After lunch we leave Christchurch and head south for Lake Tekapo. This picture perfect lakeside village is known as a ski resort in winter and aquatic playground in summer. The landscape of the surrounding Southern Alps is outstanding, sculpted by successive Ice Age glaciers, the remnants of which give the lake its intense turquoise hue. The sky is huge and of extraordinary clarity, making this one of the world’s best locations to probe the heavens. An observatory sits on top of Mt John. Our accommodation is situated right along the edge of the lake. Day 2: Lake Tekapo to Queenstown Mt John has the worlds best star gazing! Day Plan We have time to enjoy Lake Tekapo before leaving for Queenstown in the mid-morning. Your guide will take a break at one of the many salmon farms along the drive to allow you to feed the salmon and taste some sashimi. After heading past Lake Pukaki and Mt Cook (the highest in New Zealand at 3,764 metres) and through the village of Omarama there is a chance to experience some wine tasting just outside of Queenstown.
    [Show full text]
  • Bugle 445 10 October 2018.Pub
    Published by Issue 445 Kurow Wednesday Information Centre as a service to our community 10 October 2018 KUROW 1897 KUROW INFORMATION CENTRE & KUROW MUSEUM NEW OPENING HOURS FOR THE SUMMER SEASON MONDAY - FRIDAY 8:30AM - 5:30PM SATURDAY - SUNDAY 10AM - 4PM 03 434 0080 230 Thames Highway Oamaru TO BOOK A COMMUNITY CAR: Phone 027 282 0615 or 4360 950 KUROW WALKING GROUP: Fridays at 9am , at the car park for the Kurow Hill Walking Track, Grey Street. Walk time about 60-90 minutes. Contact the Info Centre for more detail. BLUE GUM WOOD CHIPS AVAILABLE IN KUROW: Contact Carron or Nikki for details: A fundraiser for the Waitaki Valley Community Society RATES REBATE FORMS AND INFORMATION ARE AT THE CENTRE ANNIVERSARY OF SOCIAL SECURITY: On September 9th a tree was planted in the grounds of St Stephen's Church to mark the 80th anniversary of the Social Security Act initiated by the "Three Wise Men " of Kurow: Rev Nordmeyer, Dr McMillian & Mr Davidson, Headmaster of the Kurow District High School. It was planted by a nephew of Rev. Nordmeyer, Barney McCone. The tree was donated by Danny and Kay Winstanley. On Sunday 30th September a community afternoon tea was held to also acknowledge the anniversary. This was also an opportunity to trial the idea of a regular community get-to-gether. Those who were able to attend enjoyed the antics of Charlie the Clown as he created balloon animals and taught the art of large bubble making to the attendees. While the group was small in number the laughter was loud and great conversations were had.
    [Show full text]