DOCSLIB.ORG

Submissions Received During Abalone Review 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submissions Received During Abalone Review 2019 Submission individual/ Organisation Category shore/ method Target stock view Compliance rating Bag limit of 5 Suggested Bag limit comments Possession Suggested Possession comments Boat limit Suggested Boat limit comments Non-fisher Suggested Non-fisher limit comments: Consumption at Consumption at sea comments: Minimum Minumum age licence comments Possession Possession deeming Measuring Measure device comments Remove Comm measuring comments: Abalone tool Tool comments: Night Night time closure comments: Northern Northern Area Comments: Designated Designated port comments: Administrative matters and further comments # organisatio boat bag limit limit from 20 to possession limit of 15 boat limit possession of 2 non- sea. age of deeming provisions comments: device commercial definition: time Area ports and n 10. fisher licence provisions definition fishers to closure definition landing areas possession holder (< 10 measure limit years) immediately. #1 Organisation Tasmanian Conservation Trust Environmental NGO the shore snorkel I tend to only take abalone declined fair Support 5 Supports the notion that recreational fishing is “for feed” rather than for Do not support 5 Possession Limit and Bag Limit should be the same to Support Will help reduce illegal take and reduce pressure on stocks. Support 2 Suggest a household limit of 15 Do not support Open to manipulation to allow catch of Do not Licence holders should be 16 years old. There could be a provision to allow minors to Support Age limit should be 16 years Support Helps standardises measurements. Do not support Protecting undersized abalone is vital for the Support Reduces damage to abalone and wastage. Support Will make enforcement easier. Support Do not support Marine police resources are already too limited with regards to fisheries The recreational take of abalone in Tasmania makes up an insignificant part of the overall statewide commercial catch. Changes to recreational fishing are unlikely to have a significant impact when diving for other “filling the freezer” or some other purpose. make enforcement easier and to reduce fishing abalone for any residential address. undersized abalone and exceed bag support take abalone under the supervision of accompanying adults, which would be taken off rather than 10 years. management of this fishery. Commercial fishers seem management. Unless marine police can guarantee that monitoring new on fisheries sustainability or solve problems for the statewide commercial sector. However, these proposed changes would benefit the fishery by reducing waste, making enforcement easier reasons pressure on stocks. There should also be a 15 abalone Should also be a limit of 15 abalone per residential address. Recreational licence holders should limits. adult's bag limit. happy to measure underwater. This requirement, designated ports will not cause problems then this proposal should be rejected. and reinforcing the notion that recreational fishing should be for "providing a feed and not filling the freezer". limit per household/address. be Tasmanian residents. although unlikely to be enforced provides a definite guide to what is acceptable behaviour to both It should be noted that the recreational catch is also much more significant on the east and southeast coast and would benefit from more specific management changes. Recreational catch recreational and commercial divers. likely exceed commercial catch in this region. At the 26 July 2019 Abalone Fishery Advisory Committee (AbFAC) meeting, members were informed by IMAS that current size limits would still allow stocks to be fished down to the point of collapse. This is of particular concern in areas in the east and southeast coasts targeted by recreational fishers, who are not constrained by economic limits and represent a large pool of latent effort. Increasing recreational fishing and illegal take in the east and southeast in particular may lead to localised serial depletion and even local collapse of abalone stocks. This problem needs to be considered in more detail and needs to be urgently addressed. There is a critical need to ensure that size limits adequately protect stocks in the recreational fishery, as ultimately an appropriate size limit is the only effective safeguard against fishery collapse along much of the Tasmanian coastline due to recreational fishing. There needs to be an explicit strategy to develop size limits that provide this protection to the recreational fishery. Licensing requirements could also be improved. If it is impossible to make it a requirement to make it compulsory for licence holders to be Tasmanian residents, then licence holders should have to have a Tasmanian residential address. Recreational fishers should not be permitted to take any abalone from Tasmania to other jurisdictions. Tour operators that run abalone fishing tours should be made jointly responsible for any breaches of fisheries regulations made by any of their clients while on one of their organised trips. Greater effort needs to be made to ensure, through education and enforcement, the rule that licence holders must take their own fish. Another major threat to the abalone fishery is the expanding urchin barrens on Tasmania's east coast. Long-spined sea urchin numbers have increased as a direct result of overfishing of rock lobster. This has resulted in the almost complete removal of large (carapace length >140 mm) rock lobsters that are the only significant local predator for these urchins. This has resulted in the ongoing expansion of urchin barrens and destruction of the reef habitat that supports the abalone fishery (as well as the rock lobster fishery and other fisheries). A recent IMAS report indicates that 15% of east coast reefs have already been lost to these barrens and there is an expectation that 50% will be lost inn the near future. In some areas 90% of reef has been lost. A recent report to the Tasmanian Abalone Council stated that this problem is costing the commercial fishery $49 million/year. This is a major problem for the fishery and cost to the Tasmanian community, even ignoring impacts on biodiversity and recreational fishing amenity. There is still no evidence-based plan to deal effectively with long-spined urchin barrens on the east coast (or anywhere else), despite this issue being raised by the Tasmanian Conservation Trust for over 20 years. Abalone, rock lobster and other fisheries are excluded from established urchin barrens. Once established, these barrens cannot be expected to recover without human intervention in the foreseeable future. Cost and depth limitations for working divers means that there is no realistic expectation that established barrens will ever recover using existing technologies, although new technologies, including remote or autonomous underwater vehicles (ROVs and AUVs) may be a possible solution. To protect biodiversity and abalone fisheries, there needs to be an evidence based strategy that ensures that the density of large rock lobster (carapace length >140 mm) will increase to levels where they will control numbers of barren forming long-spined urchins and prevent further barren formation. There is an urgent need to develop effective strategies to better manage the rock lobster fishery and deal with the urchin barren disaster. In 2018 Abalone FAC, Crustacean FAC and Recreational FAC all recommended that the Minister set up an ongoing broad based stakeholder group that would meet regularly to develop effective strategies to deal with urchin barrens. Even this basic step has not been achieved. Research also needs to be done to identify to relationship between rock lobster and abalone with aim of protecting the abalone fishery as well as biodiversity. A comprehensive, adequate and representative system of no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) would facilitate this research, protect biodiversity, act as a baseline reference to help identify impacts of fishing and climate change, and also increase egg rock lobster egg production which may increase self recruitment success for Tasmania rock lobsters. #2 Organisation Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania indigenous On the whole, this submission This submission does not support the only tools being supports the minimum age used as a knife or abalone iron for Aboriginal activities, requirements and possession deeming either under current recreational regulation or for recreational fisheries, however Aboriginal cultural and ceremonial activities. It will, there needs to be exemptions for however, support these amendments for recreational Aboriginal fisheries, particularly in fisheries. Aboriginal Tasmanians also possess cultural regard to permits for Aboriginal tools that are still made and used today, where the size cultural and ceremonial activities. and shape of the wooden wedges and levers are The rights of adults to teach Support but note: This submission will support the radically different to the proscribed metal tools. children may, or will, be impacted by removal of the requirements for commercial fishers to Furthermore, stone may be used to remove the flesh this amendment, particularly in our measure every abalone, however this amendment from the meat, when these are cultural activities. island communities of Bass Strait and The definition of a measuring device should be expanded needs a check and balance for those commercial divers Tasmanian Aboriginal people may also choose to not Bruny Island. Where abalone is a to allow the interaction of other cultural indicators for first entering
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Merluccius Productus) Distribution and Poleward Sub-Surface Flow in the California Current System
    The relationship between hake (Merluccius productus) distribution and poleward sub-surface flow in the California Current System Vera N. Agostini1*, Robert C. Francis1, Anne B. Hollowed2, Stephen D. Pierce3, Chris Wilson2, Albert N. Hendrix1. 1. School of Aquatic and Fishery Science, University of Washington, Box 355020, Seattle WA 98149 [email protected] [email protected] 2. National Marine Fisheries Service-AFSC, Sand Point Way, Seattle, WA 98143 [email protected] [email protected] 3. Oregon State University-COAS, 104 COAS Admin Bldg, Corvallis, OR 97331 4. [email protected] *Present address: Pew Institute for Ocean Science, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker way, Miami, FL 33133 ([email protected]) Phone: 305.421.4165 Fax: 305.421.4077 1 Abstract In a search for ocean conditions potentially affecting the extent of Pacific hake (Merluccius productus) feeding migrations, we analyzed data collected in 1995 and 1998 by the National Marine Fishery Service on abundance and distribution of hake (by echo- integration), intensity and distribution of alongshore flow (from acoustic Doppler current profiler) and temperature (CTD profiles). Our results show that Pacific hake are associated with subsurface poleward flow and not a specific temperature range. Temporal and spatial patterns characterize both hake distribution and undercurrent characteristics during the two years of this study. We suggest that poleward flow in this area defines adult hake habitat, with flow properties aiding or impeding the poleward migration of the population. We conclude that while physical processes may not directly affect fish production, they may be the link between large scale ocean-atmosphere variability and pelagic fish distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 JIMAR Annual Report
    INE AND A AR TM M O R S P O H F E E R T I C U T R I E T S S E N I A T R N C I H O J ~ UH-NOAA~ JIMAR Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2008 For Cooperative Agreement NA17RJ1230 Thomas A. Schroeder, PhD Director Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research University of Hawai’i at Manoa 1000 Pope Road, MSB 312 Honolulu, HI 96822 USA www.soest.hawaii.edu/jimar INE AND A AR TM M O R S P O H F E E R T I C U T R I E T S S E N I A T R N C I H O J ~ UH-NOAA~ Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2008 Thomas A. Schroeder, PhD Director Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research University of Hawaii at Manoa 1000 Pope Road, MSB 312 Honolulu, HI 96822 http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/jimar JIMAR 2008 Annual Report ii Table of Contents Introduction ______________________________________________________________________________v Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 2008 Equatorial Oceanography ___________________________________________________________________1 Tsunami Research _________________________________________________________________________3 Climate Research _________________________________________________________________________6 Tropical Meteorology _____________________________________________________________________14 Fisheries Oceanography ___________________________________________________________________16 Coastal Research ________________________________________________________________________81 JIMAR Senior Fellow Contributions ____________________________________________________________95 JIMAR Scientist Contributions ______________________________________________________________101
    [Show full text]
  • Information Report Number 2018-06
    INFORMATION REPORTS NUMBER 2018-06 FISH DIVISION Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife A stereo video system for monitoring Oregon’s Marine Reserves: Construction, testing, and pilot study of a convertible stereo system for lander and SCUBA surveys Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife prohibits discrimination in all of its programs and services on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability. If you believe that you have been discriminated against as described above in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire further information, please contact ADA Coordinator, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE, Salem, OR 97302 503-947-6000. This material will be furnished in alternate format for people with disabilities if needed. Please call 541-757-4263 to request A stereo video system for monitoring Oregon’s Marine Reserves: Construction, testing, and pilot study of a convertible stereo system for lander and SCUBA surveys Ashley Knight, Oregon State University, ODFW Marine Reserves Fellow Jessica Watson, ODFW Marine Reserves Program Jaqueline Dixon, Oregon State University Lindsay Aylesworth, ODFW Marine Reserves Program Cristen Don, ODFW Marine Reserves Program David Fox, ODFW Marine Resources Program CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Methods 1. Construction 1.1 Assembly of stereo systems 1.2 Scuba diver operated video (DOV) platform 1.3 Double Stereo Lander (SteLa) platform 1.4 Lighting for the DOV and SteLa 2. Digital settings and software 2.1 GoPro settings and related equipment 2.2 Measurement and calibration software 2.3 Calibration protocols 2.3.1 Collecting calibration imagery 2.3.2 Maintaining and testing the integrity of the calibration 3.
    [Show full text]
  • LTRMP Fish Monitoring Procedures
    Long Term Resource Monitoring Program Program Report 95-P002-1 Long Term Resource Monitoring Program Procedures: Fish Monitoring This PDF file may appear different from the printed report because of slight variations incurred by electronic transmission. The substance of the report remains unchanged. July 1995 Long Term Resource Monitoring Program Procedures: Fish Monitoring by Steve Gutreuter, Randy Burkhardt, and Kenneth Lubinski National Biological Service Environmental Management Technical Center 575 Lester Avenue Onalaska, Wisconsin 54650 July 1995 The Environmental Management Technical Center issues LTRMP Program Reports to provide Long Term Resource Monitoring Program partners with programmatic documentation, procedures manuals, training manuals, and geospatial applications. National Biological Service Environmental Management Technical Center CENTER DIRECTOR Robert L. Delaney SCIENCE ADVISOR John W. Barko INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DIRECTOR Norman W. Hildrum ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESEARCH DIRECTOR Steve Gutreuter MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS AND INTEGRATION DIRECTOR Kenneth Lubinski INFORMATION TRANSFER AND MEDIA SERVICES MANAGER Terry D'Erchia Cover graphic by Mi Ae Lipe-Butterbrodt Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Biological Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. The National Biological Service . gathering, analyzing, and sharing the biological information necessary to support the wise stewardship of the Nation's natural resources. Printed on recycled paper Preface The Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP) was authorized under the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as an element of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) Environmental Management Program. The original authorization for the LTRMP was for 10 years, starting in 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Camera Applications for Electronic Monitoring
    Wallace, F., K. Williams, R. Towler, and K. McGauley. 2015. Innovative Camera Applications 105 for Electronic Monitoring. In: G.H. Kruse, H.C. An, J. DiCosimo, C.A. Eischens, G.S. Gislason, D.N. McBride, C.S. Rose, and C.E. Siddon (eds.), Fisheries Bycatch: Global Issues and Creative Solutions. Alaska Sea Grant, University of Alaska Fairbanks. http://doi. org/10.4027/fbgics.2015.06 © Alaska Sea Grant, University of Alaska Fairbanks Innovative Camera Applications for Electronic Monitoring Farron Wallace, Kresimir Williams, and Rick Towler NOAA Fisheries, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington, USA, [email protected] Katy McGauley Alaska Groundfish Data Bank, Anchorage, Alaska, USA Abstract Electronic monitoring has been shown to be an effective tool to meet a variety of fisheries monitoring objectives in compliance-based pro- grams. However, these systems have not been effective in delivering individual fish data similar to information collected by an observer. Development of new camera-based systems, methods, and tools is critical for collecting scientific data to inform management. A camera system being developed at the Alaska Fisheries Science Center greatly improves the functionality and addresses many of the limitations of electronic monitoring systems. This system provides the ability to automatically collect length measurements in addition to monitoring for compliance. System capacity to identify and automatically capture high quality (HD) stereo images of catch events, for efficient identification of fish to species or species group, is being actively developed. Because only images of individual catch events are stored and reviewed, post- processing and storage costs are reduced, facilitating data transfer and data management.
    [Show full text]
  • Filedi Framework for Measuring Fish Length from Digital Images
    International Journal of the Physical Sciences Vol. 7(4), pp. 607 - 618, 23 January, 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS DOI: 10.5897/IJPS11.1581 ISSN 1992 - 1950 © 2012 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper FiLeDI Framework for Measuring Fish Length from Digital Images Mohd Rahim Mohd Shafry, Amjad Rehman, Rosely Kumoi, Norhaida Abdullah and Tanzila Saba* Faculty of Computer Science and Information System, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia. Accepted 15 December, 2011 Fish is an important source of protein in most countries in the world. The need to know the reproduction and population of fish is crucial for optimum exploitation of fish resources in maintaining the requirement of mankind in the future. In fisheries research, the length of a fish is the main parameter needed to identify fish reproduction, recruitment, growth and mortality. Current method used to acquire these length samples could be problematic as it is manually done; the fish need to be purchased in large quantities and then measuring one by one is time consuming and imprecise. The manual process may lead to overflowing cost. The fish length from digital images (FileDI) framework attempts to avoid this problem using a combination of optical theory and image processing techniques that automatically measures the length of the fish. It reduces cost, faster than previous method and yields accurate length measurement. Preliminary test has shown that the confident level of the FiLeDI framework accuracy is as high as 95% for fish length measurement. Key words: Fish length, image processing, optical theory. INTRODUCTION In fisheries research, the length of a fish is an important to huge amount of cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Atlantic Cod Bycatch in the Maine Lobster Fishery and Its Impacts on Stock Assessment Robert E
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-12-2018 Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Atlantic Cod Bycatch in the Maine Lobster Fishery and Its Impacts on Stock Assessment Robert E. Boenish University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biostatistics Commons, Longitudinal Data Analysis and Time Series Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Population Biology Commons, Statistical Methodology Commons, Statistical Models Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Boenish, Robert E., "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Atlantic Cod Bycatch in the Maine Lobster Fishery and Its Impacts on Stock Assessment" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2829. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2829 This Open-Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPATIO-TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF ATLANTIC COD BYCATCH IN THE MAINE LOBSTER FISHERY AND ITS IMPACTS ON STOCK ASSESSMENT By Robert E. Boenish B.S. Western Washington University, 2013 A DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Marine Digest
    2021 Marine Fishing Season Dates and Limits • FREE New Jersey May 2021 Shell Recycling page 20 Size and Possession Limits page 17 A Summary of Recreational Regulations and Marine Fish and Shellfish Management Information NJFishandWildlife.com Get a GEICO quote for your boat and, in just 15 minutes, you’ll know how much you could be saving. If you like what you hear, you can buy your policy right on the spot. Then let us do the rest while you enjoy your free time with peace of mind. geico.com/boat | 1-800-865-4846 Some discounts, coverages, payment plans, and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. In the state of CA, program provided through Boat Association Insurance Services, license #0H87086. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2020 GEICO 20_206641 Feature Articles Contents 4 Governor’s Surf Fishing Tournament 10 Marine Regulations — Finfish 14 Marine Species Identification 16 Marine Regulations — Mollusks and Crustaceans 17 State Seasons, Minimum Size and Possession Limits Chart 18 Federal Recreational Fishing Regulations Ocean Oddities 19 Shellfish and Non-Commercial Crab Pot License Information 6 21 New Online Map Services 22 Skillful Angler Recognition Program 24 New Jersey State Record Marine Sport Fish 26 Health Advisories / Gills to Grills Recipe Corner Hotlines New Jersey Fish and Wildlife Report Marine, Shellfish and Finfish Violations (609) 748-2050 or call the 24-hour DEP Hotline: 877-WARNDEP Violators of the Marine Fisheries laws are subject to a $30–$100 per fish or $300 to $3,000 fine.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Response to Public Comments on the 2014 External Peer Review Draft Aquatic Life AWQ Chronic Criterion for Selenium-Freshwate
    EPA Response to Public Comments on the 2014 External Peer Review Draft Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Chronic Criterion for Selenium-Freshwater EPA Response to Public Comments on the 2014 External Peer Review Draft Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Chronic Criterion for Selenium-Freshwater In May 2014, EPA released an External Peer Review Draft national recommended aquatic life criterion for the pollutant selenium in freshwater and provided in total a 75-day public comment period on the draft document (ending July 28, 2014). The 2014 draft document was then subjected to an independent, contractor- led, external expert peer review, and peer reviewers were provided the 2014 public comments for their information. In July 2015, EPA released a revised draft selenium criterion document that reflected consideration of: a) the external expert peer review feedback on the 2014 draft criterion, b) the external expert peer reviewers’ feedback on the 2014 public comments provided to the peer reviewers, and; c) EPA’s own consideration of comments from the 2014 public comments on the draft criterion. The following is a summary of public comments received on the 2014 External Peer Review Draft Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Chronic Criterion for Selenium - Freshwater and EPA responses reflecting the science as presented in the 2016 final document. The 2014 public comments listed in this document were arranged into major categories. For each comment category a summary of overarching public comments is provided and comments from individual commenters were divided across identified categories. For the full individual public comments, the reader is directed to the public docket at regulations.gov (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2004-0019) https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA-HQ-OW-2004-0019.
    [Show full text]
  • Bycatch Reduction Device Testing Protocol Manual
    FINAL BYCATCH REDUCTION DEVICE TESTING PROTOCOL MANUAL MARCH 1997 South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 1 Southpark Circle, Suite 306 Charleston, South Carolina 29407-4699 (803) 571-4366 FAX (803) 769-4520 email: [email protected] A publication of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA67FC0003. The Protocol Was Developed Through the Cooperative Effort of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council’s Ad Hoc Bycatch Reduction Advisory Panel, Scientific and Statistical Committee and Staff. SOUTH ATLANTIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL AD HOC BRD ADVISORY PANEL John W. Watson NMFS Pascagoula Laboratory Dr. Arvind Shah University of South Alabama Sean McKenna NCDEHNR Larry Delancey SCDNR James L. Music Jr. GDNR William H. Teehan FMFC Dr. James Murray University of North Carolina, Sea Grant Dr. Steven Branstetter GSAFDF Richard Vendetti University of Georgia, Marine Extension Service SOUTH ATLANTIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL Roger Pugliese Fishery Biologist This document is based on the Evaluation of BRDs Sampling Protocol Manual for Data Collection (NMFS 1992) developed for the Cooperative Program Addressing Finfish Bycatch. The NMFS requires this information to minimize the bycatch of Spanish mackerel and weakfish in the penaeid shrimp fishery. The data and testing will be used to develop improved bycatch reduction devices (BRDs). Responses are required under the Magnuson-Stevens Act to obtain certification that allows use of a BRD in the shrimp fishery of the South Atlantic Region. All data submitted will be shared with industry, fishery management agencies, and the scientific community. Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Studies of Fishing Gear Selectivity in the Mediterranean
    COPEMED A REVIEW OF STUDIES OF FISHING GEAR SELECTIVITY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN by Peter A M Stewart Aberdeen, Scotland December 2001 Contents Page Contents 1 Summary 2 Introduction 4 Reviewing the Literature 5 Studies on Gear Selectivity in the Mediterranean 6 a) General documents and papers (5) 6 b) Gear selectivity for demersal fish species (27) 6 c) Gear selectivity for shellfish species (9) 7 d) Selectivity of novel cod-ends (18) 7 e) Selectivity of set gear (nets, traps, lines) and artisanal fisheries (15) 8 f) Stock assessment, surveys and selectivity of survey gear (15) 8 g) Gear performance and catch composition (9) 9 h) Techniques for the measurement and analysis of selectivity data (7+3) 9 i) By-catches of marine mammals and reptiles (11) 10 Gear Selectivity Studies outwith the Mediterranean 10 Priorities for Future Research Work on Fishing Gear Selectivity in the Western Mediterranean 13 1 Summary There is considerable interest throughout the world in methods of improving the size and species selectivity of commercial fishing gears, to reduce fishing mortality and to conserve fish stocks. Recent work in several Mediterranean fisheries suggests that the techniques developed elsewhere might be useful, even in multi-species fisheries, to reduce discarding, particularly of non-target species. This study was commissioned to review past and present work on gear selectivity in the Mediterranean, to assess the relevance of work done elsewhere and to advise on experimental methods. By restricting the search to marine fisheries within the western and eastern Mediterranean, 116 relevant papers were found. A bibliography was compiled with nine categories: reviews, demersal fish selectivity, shellfish selectivity, novel cod-end selectivity, selectivity of set gear and artisanal fisheries, stock assessment surveys, gear performance and catch composition, techniques of measurement and analysis and by- catches of large sea creatures.
    [Show full text]