DOCSLIB.ORG

Fennemore Craig P.C. Proposal 09-27-16

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fennemore Craig P.C. Proposal 09-27-16 Overview of Qualifications Presented to: Nevada Affordable Housing Assistance Corporation Overview of Fennemore Craig Fennemore Craig is an innovative law firm leader helping clients meet the challenges of an ever- changing business environment. Fennemore Craig has nearly 200 lawyers with offices in Las Vegas Reno, Phoenix, Tucson, Nogales and Denver. With a heritage of more than 130 years of service to clients, we pledge to treat every client relationship with integrity and respect. We strive to provide value for each matter we undertake, delivering solutions vital to the growth and prosperity of our clients. We view every client relationship as one for the long term. Our attorneys are excited to support the mission of the Nevada Affordable Housing Assistance Corporation (NAHAC) which helps Nevada homeowners struggling to pay their mortgages due to financial hardships. During the past 10 years, an explosion in the level of regulation and scrutiny of tax-exempt organizations by the IRS, Congress, state regulators, watchdog groups, and the media requires nonprofit leaders to be more transparent and to adhere to evolving best practices and continually changing laws and regulations. The depth and collective years of experience of the lawyers in Fennemore Craig’s Nonprofit and Tax-Exempt Organizations practice have represented many of the nonprofit and tax-exempt organizations that have shaped the nonprofit landscape in the Southwest. The nonprofit and tax-exempt sector is broad and diverse, and Fennemore Craig’s clients reflect this diversity. Fennemore Craig’s tax-exempt and nonprofit clients include community and other grant- making foundations; hospitals and healthcare providers; trade associations; nationally and internationally federated organizations; churches and other religious institutions; arts organizations and museums; public, private and charter schools; colleges and universities; supporting organizations; social welfare organizations; organizations involved in lobbying and political activities; veterans organizations; and tribal and governmental entities. We have a focused niche practice; however, as part of a full-service firm with offices in Las Vegas and Reno and across the Mountain West, we are able to coordinate legal services across the full spectrum of our client’s legal needs. In consultation with attorneys from our corporate, mergers and acquisitions, real property, labor and employment, estate planning, intellectual property, employee benefits, tax and other practice groups, we offer a coordinated approach to providing legal services to our nonprofit and tax-exempt clients. We even act as outside general counsel for a number of our clients providing a coordinated, seamless approach to solving their legal issues. Nonprofit and Tax-Exempt Organizations Practice Fennemore Craig has represented many of the nonprofit and tax-exempt organizations that have shaped the Southwest for decades. Now more than ever, tax-exempt organizations face a high level of regulation and scrutiny. Escalating oversight from the IRS and Congress, state regulators, watchdog groups, and the media require nonprofit leaders to run a gauntlet of changing law and regulations. At the same time, tax-exempt organizations are expected to be more transparent than ever before and to adhere to evolving best practices. A Dedicated Team The lawyers in Fennemore Craig’s Nonprofit and Tax-Exempt Organizations law practice are committed to representing nonprofit and tax-exempt clients on a daily basis, not as a side practice. Our depth and collective years of experience representing nonprofit and tax-exempt organizations is unsurpassed in the Southwest. Recognized Excellence Our Nonprofit and Tax-Exempt Organizations practice group includes members of Best Lawyers in America, Southwest Super Lawyers, the American College of Tax Counsel and the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel. The partners in the practice are “AV” rated attorneys by Martindale Hubbell (the highest rating available), which signifies substantial experience and recognition by one’s peers for professional accomplishment. General Corporate and Commercial Law Fennemore Craig regularly counsels clients on a broad spectrum of general corporate and commercial matters, such as negotiating and drafting agreements, the formation of business entities, board of directors responsibilities, shareholder rights, and employment issues. Corporate Governance Fennemore Craig advises clients on a variety of corporate governance issues, including Sarbanes- Oxley compliance, corporate compliance programs, and internal investigations. Contracts and Leasing Fennemore Craig regularly drafts, reviews and negotiates all types of contracts. We assess terms of contracts to be aware of potential areas of conflict. Our experience allows us to review your contract knowing the many potential problem areas. We are also familiar with how the courts have interpreted various contract provisions and can advise you of the meaning. Our attorneys can also advise you of clauses that are particularly important for you to have in your contracts. Employment and Labor Relations The Labor and Employment Practice advises and represents management in virtually all aspects of the employment relationship. Fennemore Craig’s employer clients range from large mining and utility companies to non-profits and service and professional firms. Fennemore Craig has comprehensive experience in counseling clients on a broad array of employment matters. We counsel employers with regard to personnel policies and procedures, individual employment decisions, drug and alcohol testing policies, ERISA and non-ERISA benefits, and compliance with state and federal statutes and regulations. We also assist clients with drafting legally compliant employment policies and assist with training their supervisory work force on all applicable employment laws and regulations. Our clients are invited to attend periodic employment law seminars, at which we discuss recent developments in the law and emerging client concerns. We also have broad experience in litigation alleging breach of employment contract, wrongful termination, employment discrimination and related claims. In addition, Fennemore Craig attorneys frequently represent clients before federal and state administrative agencies, including the Nevada Office of the Labor Commissioner, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Economic Security and the National Labor Relations Board. Government Procurement Claims and Government Affairs Fennemore Craig’s Government Procurement practice covers client issues that intersect with a host of government agencies and departments at all levels. Our practice includes government procurement, government contract disputes, permitting and regulation enforcement, zoning and land use, tax, and litigation. One of our attorneys served as the Director of the Nevada Department of Business and Industry. At the federal level, we often represent clients before governmental agencies that include the Environmental Protection Agency, Interstate Commerce Commission, Securities Exchange Commission, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service. Business Litigation Fennemore Craig’s litigation section offers a wide range of experience in all aspects of dispute resolution and prevention. Our attorneys are proficient in alternative dispute resolution techniques, negotiated settlements, appeals, and traditional trial representation, as well as advice on the prevention of claims and avoidance of litigation. A number of our attorneys also serve as mediators, arbitrators and private judges. Fennemore Craig is available for consultation, strategy, advisement and drafting of responses to subpoenas, court orders, and requests for information from third parties. E-Discovery and Data Management Fennemore Craig assists clients with the pressing demands for preservation, management, disclosure, discovery and production of electronically stored information (ESI) in connection with litigation and dispute resolution. Whether a client needs assistance developing a data management plan, responding to a litigation hold letter or discovery requests, or preparing policies on data preservation and destruction, Fennemore Craig's e-discovery attorneys can guide clients through the process. They are supported by the firm’s litigation technology resources team, which includes our Information Systems staff experienced in e-discovery and data management issues associated with litigation as well as outside computer forensics and information management resources. All contribute to the firm’s experience in complex litigation involving e-discovery. Cost Proposal Rate Structure Fennemore Craig provides competitive rates for all areas of its work. Based upon the proposed team outlined below, the rates will vary between $250 and $565 per hour. These rates represent a 10% discount from the firm’s normal rates. Once we better understand the needs of NAHAC and depending upon the skill set required and the complexity of the work, we will be in a better position to propose some alternatives to billing on an hourly basis. With organizations similar to NAHAC, we have offered blended rates for different tiers of work to reduce the hourly costs. In addition, the firm welcomes the opportunity to work on a fixed fee basis when it is possible for the client and the firm to realistically assess the amount and complexity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Supreme Court's Attack on Attorneys' Freedom of Expression: the Gentile V
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 43 Issue 4 Article 43 1993 The Supreme Court's Attack on Attorneys' Freedom of Expression: The Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada Decision Suzanne F. Day Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Suzanne F. Day, The Supreme Court's Attack on Attorneys' Freedom of Expression: The Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada Decision, 43 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 1347 (1993) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol43/iss4/43 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE SUPREME COURT'S AITACK ON ATTORNEYS' FREEDOM OF ExPRESSION: THE GENTILE v. STATE BAR OF NEVADA DECISION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............. ............ 1349 A. The Dilemma of the Defense Attorney ....... 1349 B. State Court Rules Restricting Attorney Communication with the Media ............. 1350 11. CONSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS RAISED BY RESTRICTING PRETRIAL PUBLICITY THROUGH CURBING THE SCOPE OF ATrORNEY SPEECH: THE FAIR TRIAL - FREE PRESS DEBATE ...... ........................ 1351 A. The Sheppard v. Maxwell Decision: The United States Supreme Court's Directive to Trial Court Judges ............................ 1352 B. The Conflicting First Amendment Rights of Attorneys, Sixth Amendment Rights of the Defendant, and the State and Public Interest in the Impartial Administration of Justice ........... 1355 1. What the Amendments Guarantee ......... 1355 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Licensure General Disclosure Juris Doctor
    Last Updated: 8/17/2020 Professional Licensure General Disclosure Juris Doctor In accordance with 34 C.F.R. §668.43, and in compliance with the requirements outlined in the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements (SARA) Manual, DePaul University provides the following disclosure related to the educational requirements for professional licensure and certification1. This disclosure is strictly limited to the University’s determination of whether its educational program, Juris Doctor, if successfully completed, would be sufficient to meet the educational licensure or certification requirements in a State for a licensed attorney.2 DePaul cannot provide verification of an individual’s ability to meet licensure or certification requirements unrelated to its educational programming. This disclosure does not provide any guarantee that any particular state licensure or certification entity will approve or deny your application. Furthermore, this disclosure does not account for changes in state law or regulation that may affect your application for licensure and occur after this disclosure has been made. Enrolled students and prospective students are strongly encouraged to contact their State’s licensure entity using the links provided to review all licensure and certification requirements imposed by their state(s) of choice. DePaul University has designed an educational program curriculum for a Juris Doctor, that if successfully completed is sufficient to meet the licensure and certification requirements for a licensed attorney in the following
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the President
    NEVADA LAWYER EDITORIAL BOARD Patricia D. Cafferata, Chair Scott McKenna Message from Michael T. Saunders, Chair-Elect Gregory R. Shannon Richard D. Williamson, Vice Chair Stephen F. Smith Mark A. Hinueber, Immediate Past Chair Beau Sterling Erin Barnett Kristen E. Simmons Hon. Robert J. Johnston Scott G. Wasserman the President Lisa Wong Lackland John Zimmerman Frank Flaherty, Esq., State Bar of Nevada President BOARD OF GOVERNORS President: Frank Flaherty, Carson City President Elect: Alan Lefebvre, Las Vegas DUES TALK Vice President: Elana Graham “I will not make any broad promises to you on Immediate Past President: Constance Akridge, Las Vegas behalf of the board, beyond stating that we do not anticipate a dues increase within the Paola Armeni, Las Vegas Mason Simons, Elko Elizabeth Brickfield, Las Vegas Hon. David Wall (Ret.), next few years and that the board and staff Laurence Digesti, Reno Las Vegas Eric Dobberstein, Las Vegas Ex-Officio will continue to work diligently to control costs Vernon (Gene) Leverty, Reno Interim Dean and to be smart with your dues dollars.” Paul Matteoni, Reno Nancy Rapoport, Ann Morgan, Reno UNLV Boyd School of Law Richard Pocker, Las Vegas Richard Trachok, Chair October always seems to be a good time to talk about money. At the last Bryan Scott, Las Vegas Board of Bar Examiners Richard Scotti, Las Vegas meeting of the Board of Governors (BOG), we spent some time discussing your licensing fees, typically referred to as “dues.” I am happy to report that STATE BAR STAFF the State Bar of Nevada is in good shape, fiscally and otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Job Board Network - Network Members
    Legal Job Board Network - Network Members • ACBA Job Board • Albuquerque Bar Association • American Health Law Association • Arizona Attorney Magazine Career Center • Association for Conflict Resolution • Atlanta Bar Association • Bar Association of Lehigh County • Bar Association of Montgomery County Maryland • BASF Career Center • Boston Bar Association • BPLA Career Center • California Alliance of Paralegal Associations • CBA Career Center • Clearwater Bar Association • Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association • DBA Career Center • DeKalb Bar Association • District of Columbia Bar Career Center • DuPage County Bar Association • Fayette County Bar Association • Grand Rapids Bar Association • Hennepin County Bar Association • Hillsborough County Bar Association • Illinois Chapter of National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys • Illinois Defense Counsel Career Center • Illinois State Bar Association Career Center • ISBA Career Center • Jacksonville Bar Association • Johnson County Bar Association • Kansas Bar Association • KBA Career Center • King County Bar Association • LA Legal Jobs • LAPA Career Center • Lawyers Without Borders (LWOB) • Macomb County Bar Association • Maine State Bar Association • Maricopa County Bar Association • Maryland Association of Paralegals • Milwaukee Bar Association • Minnesota Paralegal Association • Mississippi Bar Job Board • MSBA Career Center • NALS Career Center • Nashville Bar Association • National Capital Area Paralegal Association (NCAPA) • National Creditors Bar Association • NCBA Career Center • NCBA
    [Show full text]
  • PABLE Certificate of Good Standing Repository List
    CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING CONTACT LIST Current as of May, 2019 This list is being provided only to assist you in your search It is your obligation to confirm the requirements with the jurisdiction issuing the Certificate of Good Standing ALABAMA COLORADO GEORGIA INDIANA Supreme Court of Alabama Ralph L. Carr Judicial Center Supreme Court of Georgia Clerk of the Supreme Court Office Supreme Court Clerk Colorado Supreme Court 244 Washington Street, SW Roll of Attorneys Administrator COGS Request Office of Attorney Registration Rm. 572 402 West Washington Street 300 Dexter Avenue 1300 Broadway, Suite 510 Atlanta, GA 30334 Room W062 Montgomery, AL 36104 Denver, CO 80203 (404) 656-3470 Indianapolis, IN 46204 (334) 229-0700 (303) 928-7800 (404) 656-2253 Fax (317) 232-5861, ext. 4 Fee: $15 Fee: $10, CC or MO payable to Fee: $10 Fee: $2, payable to the Clerk of http://judicial.alabama.gov/appellate Clerk of Supreme Court, Written request include SASE Courts w/ SASE call or send a /cogs send written request include SASE. https://www.gasupreme.us/court- written request http://coloradosupremecourt.com/C %20information/purchase/ https://courts- ALASKA urrent%20Lawyers/DocumentRequ ingov.zendesk.com/hc/en- Clerk of Appellate Courts ests.asp GUAM us/articles/115005248968-How-do- 303 K Street Supreme Court of Guam I-obtain-an-attorney-Certificate-of- Anchorage, AK 99501 Board of Law Examiners Good-Standing- CONNECTICUT (907) 264-0608 / 0612 Suite 300, Guam Judicial Center Clerk of the Superior Court Fee: no charge, written request for 120 W. O'Brien Drive Hartford Judicial District IOWA Supreme Court issued certificate Hagåtña, GU 96910 95 Washington Street Clerk of Supreme Court https://alaskabar.org/for- (671) 475-3120 / 3180 Hartford, CT 06106 1111 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowe V. Oregon State Bar
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL Z. CROWE; LAWRENCE K. No. 19-35463 PETERSON I; OREGON CIVIL LIBERTIES ATTORNEYS, an Oregon D.C. No. nonprofit corporation, 3:18-cv-02139- Plaintiffs-Appellants, JR v. OREGON STATE BAR, a Public Corporation; OREGON STATE BAR BOARD OF GOVERNORS; VANESSA A. NORDYKE, President of the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors; CHRISTINE CONSTANTINO, President- elect of the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors; HELEN MARIE HIERSCHBIEL, Chief Executive Officer of the Oregon State Bar; KEITH PALEVSKY, Director of Finance and Operations of the Oregon State Bar; AMBER HOLLISTER, General Counsel for the Oregon State Bar, Defendants-Appellees. 2 CROWE V. OREGON STATE BAR DIANE L. GRUBER; MARK RUNNELS, No. 19-35470 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 3:18-cv-01591- JR OREGON STATE BAR; CHRISTINE CONSTANTINO; HELEN MARIE HIERSCHBIEL, OPINION Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 12, 2020 Portland, Oregon Filed February 26, 2021 Before: Jay S. Bybee and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges, and Kathleen Cardone,* District Judge. Per Curiam Opinion; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge VanDyke * The Honorable Kathleen Cardone, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. CROWE V. OREGON STATE BAR 3 SUMMARY** Civil Rights The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims, and remanded, in actions alleging First Amendment violations arising from the Oregon State Bar’s requirement that lawyers must join and pay annual membership fees in order to practice in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • October 9, 2019 Meeting Notice and Agenda State of Nevada
    Steve Sisolak Deonne E. Contine Governor Director Robin Hager Deputy Director STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DIRECTOR’S OFFICE 515 E. Musser Street, Suite 300 │ Carson City, Nevada 89701 Phone: (775) 684-0299 │ admin.nv.gov │ Fax: (775) 684-0298 Meeting Notice and Agenda Organization: Board on Indigent Defense Services Date and Time of Meeting: Wednesday, October 9, 2019, 9:00 a.m. Place of Meeting: Legislative Counsel Bureau 401 S. Carson Street, Room 2134 Carson City, NV 89701 Videoconference Location: Grant Sawyer Building 555 E. Washington Ave, Room 4412 Las Vegas, NV 89101 If you cannot attend the meeting, you can listen to it live over the Internet. The address for the Nevada Legislature website is http://www.leg.state.nv.us. Click on the link “Calendar of Meetings – View.” Agenda 1. Open Meeting: Roll Call, Welcome, Announcements 2. Public Comment Public comment will be taken during this agenda item. No action may be taken on any matter raised under this item unless the matter is included on a future agenda as an item on which action may be taken. Persons making public comments to the Board will be taken under advisement but will no deliberation will occur during the meeting. Comments may be limited to three minutes per person at the discretion of the chairperson. Additional three minute comment periods may be allowed on individual agenda items at the discretion of the chairperson. These additional comment periods shall be limited to comments relevant to the agenda item under consideration by the Board. 3. Introduction by Board Counsel and discussion regarding Nevada Open Meeting Law.
    [Show full text]
  • MARSHAL S. WILLICK 3591 East Bonanza Road, Ste
    MARSHAL S. WILLICK 3591 East Bonanza Road, Ste. 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89110-2101 (702) 438-4100, ext. 103 [email protected] Resume & Lawyer’s Biographical Data Form PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Sept. 1989 - Present Principal, Willick Law Group Las Vegas, Nevada Practicing Exclusively in Domestic Relations & Family Law (Trial and Appellate) Certified Family Law Specialist, State Bar of Nevada Sept. 1985 - Sept. 1989 Partner, LePome, Willick & Gorman Las Vegas, Nevada Trial and Appellate Litigation/Domestic Relations, Corporate, Business Sept. 1984 - Sept. 1985 Associate, Thorndal, Backus & Maupin Las Vegas, Nevada Litigation Sept. 1982 - Aug. 1984 Staff Attorney, Supreme Court of Nevada, Central Legal Staff Carson City, Nevada SELECTED PUBLICATIONS The Danger of Davidson to Pension Divisions, Nev. Lawyer, Dec. 2016, at 27. Lawyer Liability in QDRO Cases, 29 Nev. Fam. L. Rep., Fall, 2016, at 1. Military Retirement Primer, Communiqué, November, 2016, at 22 (Clark County Bar A. Pub’n) Interest and Penalties on Child Support Arrears: Another Malpractice Trap, 29 Nev. Fam. L. Rep., Winter, 2016, at 12. The New/Old Law of Partition of Omitted Assets, 28 Nev. Fam. L. Rep., Fall, 2015, at 8. A Universal Approach to Alimony: How Alimony Awards Should Be Calculated, and Why, 27 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 153 (2015). DIVORCE IN NEVADA: THE LEGAL PROCESS, YOUR RIGHTS, AND WHAT TO EXPECT (Addicus Books, 2014). Securing Your Office, in 34 Family Advocate No. 4 (Spring, 2012) (The Difficult Client) at 41. The Evolving Concept of Marriage and its Effect on Property and Support Law, Nev. Lawyer, May, 2011, at 6. How Many Days are in a Week and the Meaning of the Rivero II Opinion, 23 Nev.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Task Force Work ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Mandatory versus Voluntary ......................................................................................................................... 5 Recommendation 1: Continue the State Bar as a Mandatory Bar. ........................................................... 5 First Amendment Issues ................................................................................................................................ 6 Recommendation 2. Provide better protection of the First Amendment rights of State Bar members through more rigorous processes and a new Supreme Court administrative order. ................................. 7 Governmental Relations Program Recommendations ..................................................................... 7 Section Advocacy Recommendations ............................................................................................ 13 Justice Initiatives Program Recommendation
    [Show full text]
  • MARSHAL S. WILLICK 3591 East Bonanza Road, Ste
    MARSHAL S. WILLICK 3591 East Bonanza Road, Ste. 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89110-2101 (702) 438-4100, ext. 103 [email protected] Resume & Lawyer’s Biographical Data Form PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Sept. 1989 - Present Principal, Willick Law Group Las Vegas, Nevada Practicing Exclusively in Domestic Relations & Family Law (Trial and Appellate) Certified Family Law Specialist, State Bar of Nevada Sept. 1985 - Sept. 1989 Partner, LePome, Willick & Gorman Las Vegas, Nevada Trial and Appellate Litigation/Domestic Relations, Corporate, Business Sept. 1984 - Sept. 1985 Associate, Thorndal, Backus & Maupin Las Vegas, Nevada Litigation Sept. 1982 - Aug. 1984 Staff Attorney, Supreme Court of Nevada, Central Legal Staff Carson City, Nevada SELECTED PUBLICATIONS The Danger of Davidson to Pension Divisions, Nev. Lawyer, Dec. 2016, at 27. Lawyer Liability in QDRO Cases, 29 Nev. Fam. L. Rep., Fall, 2016, at 1. Military Retirement Primer, Communiqué, November, 2016, at 22 (Clark County Bar A. Pub’n) Interest and Penalties on Child Support Arrears: Another Malpractice Trap, 29 Nev. Fam. L. Rep., Winter, 2016, at 12. The New/Old Law of Partition of Omitted Assets, 28 Nev. Fam. L. Rep., Fall, 2015, at 8. A Universal Approach to Alimony: How Alimony Should Be Calculated and Why, 27 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 153 (2015). DIVORCE IN NEVADA: THE LEGAL PROCESS, YOUR RIGHTS, AND WHAT TO EXPECT (Addicus Books, 2014). Securing Your Office, in 34 Family Advocate No. 4 (Spring, 2012) (The Difficult Client) at 41. The Evolving Concept of Marriage and its Effect on Property and Support Law, Nev. Lawyer, May, 2011, at 6. How Many Days are in a Week and the Meaning of the Rivero II Opinion, 23 Nev.
    [Show full text]
  • Gentile V. State Bar of Nevada: Trial in the Court of Public Opinion and Coping with Model Rule 3.6 - Where Do We Go from Here
    Volume 37 Issue 3 Article 4 1992 Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada: Trial in the Court of Public Opinion and Coping with Model Rule 3.6 - Where Do We Go from Here Lynn S. Fulstone Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Lynn S. Fulstone, Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada: Trial in the Court of Public Opinion and Coping with Model Rule 3.6 - Where Do We Go from Here, 37 Vill. L. Rev. 619 (1992). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol37/iss3/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Fulstone: Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada: Trial in the Court of Public Opin 19921 Notes GENTILE v. STATE BAR OF NEVADA: TRIAL IN THE "COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION" AND COPING WITH MODEL RULE 3.6-WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? I. INTRODUCTION Eight years after the American Bar Association (ABA) adopted the Model Rules of Professional Conduct,' lawyers and courts continue to struggle with the scope of restraint on lawyers' speech as governed by the ABA's Model Rule 3.6.2 The struggle continues despite the United 1. 2 GEOFFREY C. HAZARD, JR. & W. WILLIAM HODES, THE LAW OF LAWYER- ING: A HANDBOOK ON THE MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT § 201, at lxv (2d ed.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Specific Sources for Certificate of Good Standing and Disciplinary Statement Requests
    State-Specific Sources for Certificate of Good Standing and Disciplinary Statement Requests JURISDICTION ISSUES CERTIFICATES OF GOOD ISSUES DISCIPLINARY STATEMENTS STANDING Alabama Supreme Court of Alabama Disciplinary Board Clerk for the Disciplinary Board of the 300 Dexter Ave. Alabama State Bar Montgomery, AL 36104 415 Dexter Ave., PO Box 671, Montgomery, AL 36101 Phone: 334-229-0700 Phone: 334-269-1515 or 800-354-6154 Fax: 334-261-6311 Alaska Clerk of Appellate Court Alaska Bar Association 303 K Street Discipline Counsel Anchorage, AK 99501 P.O Box 100279 Anchorage, AK 99510 or Phone: 907-264-0612 550 W 7th Avenue, Suite 1900 Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: 907-272-7469 / Fax: 907-272-2932 Arizona Supreme Court of Arizona State Bar of Arizona Certification and Licensing Division 4201 N. 24th Street, 1501 West Washington, Suite 104 Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85007-3231 Phoenix, AZ 85016-6288 Phone: 602 452-3378 Phone: 602-340-7353 / Fax: 602-271-4930 Arkansas Clerk of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct 625 Marshall Street (same as Office of Professional Conduct) 1320 Justice Building 2100 Riverfront Drive, Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 7220 Phone: 501-682-6849 Phone: 501-376-0313 or 800-506-6631 Fax: 501-376-3438 California California Supreme Court State Bar of California 350 McAllister Street, Room 1295 Membership Records San Francisco, CA 94102 180 Howard Street Phone: 415-865-7000 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 888-800-3400 / Fax: 415-538-2576 Colorado Colorado Supreme Court Office of Attorney Regulation Office of Attorney Registration 1300 Broadway, Ste.
    [Show full text]