DOCSLIB.ORG

2/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication And Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2001)2/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 29-Oct-2001 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2001)2/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies THE DEVELOPMENT OF BROADBAND ACCESS IN OECD COUNTRIES E nglish - Or. English JT00115500 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2001)2/FINAL FOREWORD In June 2001, this report was presented to the Working Party on Telecommunications and Information Services Policy (TISP) and was recommended to be made public by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP) in October 2001. The report was prepared by Dr. Sam Paltridge of the OECD’s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. It is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. Copyright OECD, 2001 Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this material should be made to: Head of Publications Service, OECD, 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. 2 DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2001)2/FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Main points..................................................................................................................................................4 Developing broadband access .....................................................................................................................5 Unbundling and line sharing..................................................................................................................15 Cable ownership.....................................................................................................................................19 Broadband technologies.........................................................................................................................19 Broadband developments in OECD countries...........................................................................................21 Australia.................................................................................................................................................21 Austria....................................................................................................................................................23 Belgium..................................................................................................................................................23 Canada ...................................................................................................................................................24 Czech Republic ......................................................................................................................................25 Denmark.................................................................................................................................................25 Finland ...................................................................................................................................................26 France.....................................................................................................................................................26 Germany.................................................................................................................................................27 Greece ....................................................................................................................................................28 Hungary..................................................................................................................................................28 Iceland....................................................................................................................................................28 Ireland ....................................................................................................................................................29 Italy ........................................................................................................................................................29 Japan ......................................................................................................................................................30 Korea......................................................................................................................................................32 Luxembourg...........................................................................................................................................34 Mexico ...................................................................................................................................................34 Netherlands ............................................................................................................................................34 New Zealand ..........................................................................................................................................35 Norway...................................................................................................................................................36 Poland ....................................................................................................................................................36 Portugal..................................................................................................................................................37 Slovak Republic.....................................................................................................................................38 Spain ......................................................................................................................................................38 Sweden...................................................................................................................................................39 Switzerland ............................................................................................................................................40 Turkey....................................................................................................................................................41 United Kingdom.....................................................................................................................................42 United States ..........................................................................................................................................44 DSL pricing update....................................................................................................................................47 Initial service charges ............................................................................................................................47 Monthly service charges ........................................................................................................................47 Connection speed...................................................................................................................................49 Impact of competition on pricing...........................................................................................................49 Comparing DSL prices ..........................................................................................................................50 Comparing cable modem prices ................................................................................................................51 3 DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2001)2/FINAL Main points The development of broadband access to the Internet is gaining increasing prominence. This is occurring in fields that go well beyond communications policy. One reason for this is the role advanced communication capabilities may have played in generating higher growth in productivity rates, as well as new network- based economic activities, in some countries over recent years. If, as many believe, new communication tools such as the Internet and wireless networks boosted growth in the latter half of the 1990s, and softened the current cyclical downturn, then the next steps toward broadband access are of critical importance that go beyond the communications sector. The current bottleneck to growth in the communications sector, and beyond for areas such as electronic commerce, is the limitations of local access networks. These limitations are not just technological. The inheritance of many decades of monopoly provision of access networks is that there is usually only one, or at best two, networks passing most homes and businesses in OECD countries. In some cases the same company still owns both these networks. In liberalising their telecommunication markets OECD countries have taken a very necessary step in providing the competitive forces that will build choice for users. They have also unleashed a torrent of innovation in the communication industry that is, at last, beginning to rival that of information technology. New access technologies are being developed, existing networks being upgraded
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Broadband Services and Local Loop Unbundling in the Netherlands Nico Van Eijk, Institute for Information Law
    Broadband Services and Local Loop Unbundling in the Netherlands Nico van Eijk, Institute for Information Law This article describes the availability of broadband services in the ABSTRACT Netherlands. This particularly concerns broadband services for the consumer/end user such as access to the Internet. We will first discuss the new telecommunications act before dealing with current market relations and regulation of the (until 15 December 2000). This means telecommunications sector. This is followed by a description of the most significant deci- that — in accordance with the Euro- sions of the independent supervisory body, the Independent Post and Telecommunications pean directives — KPN has special obli- Authority, as related to broadband services. gations concerning interconnection and other forms of special access to its net- work. KPN is also responsible for pro- viding universal service (primarily he Netherlands has always been keen to take the traditional voice telephony service). On the expiration of the T lead in liberalizing the telecommunications sector. statutorily prescribed period of two years, whether KPN is still Nevertheless, it was not until the end of 1998 that Dutch leg- in the same position will again need to be established. It is islation satisfied all the underlying principles of European implicitly assumed that the operators of broadcasting networks telecommunications regulations. (the legal term for cable television networks) have significant This does not diminish the fact that, in the previous peri- market power regarding the transmission of programming. od, important liberalizations had occurred. In 1996–1997 all The market position of KPN is thus also at issue in regard to restrictions to offering telecommunications services — with the question of whether local differences in rates for public voice the exception of voice telephony — were discontinued.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1348
    Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1348 Availability of Additional Share of Retail Monthly Monthly Charge in Broadband Service Broadband Service Installation Charges Broadband Bundled Length of Broadband Service Competition Fixed Type of Broadband Speed Foreign Charge (in USD, PPP Modem Rental Promot-ional Country Offerings Name / Offerings (Connection) including Line part of Double Play/ Service Usage limit Broadband Provider's URL Provider Status Broadband Technology (download/ upload) Currency Foreign (Purchasing Power Charge Price Description (Community or Charge Rental/ Triple Play ? Contract Access Market* Currency) Parity) National Level) Leasing Charge Bigpond Cable Standard Double play/ full service Australia Telstra Bigpond Incumbent 48% Cable 8Mbps/128kbps Aus Dollar $29.95 $20.40 Self installation $15.75 12 months No 200 MB 200 MB phone http://www.bigpond.com/home Bigpond Cable Standard Double play/ full service Telstra Bigpond Incumbent Cable 8Mbps/128kbps Aus Dollar $39.95 $27.21 Self installation $15.75 12 months No 400 MB 400 MB phone Double play/ full service Telstra Bigpond Incumbent Bigpond Liberty 12 GB Cable 8Mbps/128kbps Aus Dollar $59.95 $40.84 Self installation $15.75 12 months No 12 GB phone Double play/ full service Telstra Bigpond Incumbent Bigpond Liberty 25 GB Cable 8Mbps/128kbps Aus Dollar $79.95 $54.46 Self installation $15.75 12 months No 25 GB phone Up to 30 Mbps in Bigpond Cable Extreme Sydney and Melbourne Double play/ full service Telstra Bigpond Incumbent Cable Aus Dollar $39.95 $27.21 Self installation
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Committee: General Assembly Issue: The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights of the Internet Student Officer: Giulia Dargenio, Costanza Fisogni, Beatrice Foti I) Introduction The first operative clause resolution regarding the question of the promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights of the Internet approved on the 5th of July 2018 by the UN Human Rights Committee declares: “Affirms that the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online, in particular freedom of expression, which is applicable regardless of frontiers and through any media of one’s choice, in accordance with article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” This main principle guides all the resolution and treaties approved by the UN committees regarding the matter. The digital age has brought immense new opportunities to accelerate human progress. However, this development has improved the population’s living conditions as well as worsening pre- existing criminal phenomena. Establishing a legislative framework in order to preserve individuals’ safety while respecting their fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression should be the main focus in order to elaborate effective solutions to the issue. II) The question of human rights online (analysing the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights) (Art 1, 2) Equality “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” The internet holds the promise of being a great equaliser. On the internet, traditionally marginalised people and groups find a space to voice their opinions. They can find information and associate with other people and groups in order to achieve the change they have longed for.
    [Show full text]
  • International Casting Directors Network Index
    International Casting Directors Network Index 01 Welcome 02 About the ICDN 04 Index of Profiles 06 Profiles of Casting Directors 76 About European Film Promotion 78 Imprint 79 ICDN Membership Application form Gut instinct and hours of research “A great film can feel a lot like a fantastic dinner party. Actors mingle and clash in the best possible lighting, and conversation is fraught with wit and emotion. The director usually gets the bulk of the credit. But before he or she can play the consummate host, someone must carefully select the right guests, send out the invites, and keep track of the RSVPs”. ‘OSCARS: The Role Of Casting Director’ by Monica Corcoran Harel, The Deadline Team, December 6, 2012 Playing one of the key roles in creating that successful “dinner” is the Casting Director, but someone who is often over-looked in the recognition department. Everyone sees the actor at work, but very few people see the hours of research, the intrinsic skills, the gut instinct that the Casting Director puts into finding just the right person for just the right role. It’s a mix of routine and inspiration which brings the characters we come to love, and sometimes to hate, to the big screen. The Casting Director’s delicate work as liaison between director, actors, their agent/manager and the studio/network figures prominently in decisions which can make or break a project. It’s a job that can't garner an Oscar, but its mighty importance is always felt behind the scenes. In July 2013, the Academy of Motion Pictures of Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) created a new branch for Casting Directors, and we are thrilled that a number of members of the International Casting Directors Network are amongst the first Casting Directors invited into the Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Legal Document
    Nos. 04-277 and 04-281 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NATIONAL CABLE &d TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, ET AL., Petitioners, —v.— BRAND X INTERNET SERVICES, ET AL., Respondents. (Caption continued on inside cover) ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS JENNIFER STISA GRANICK STEVEN R. SHAPIRO STANFORD LAW SCHOOL Counsel of Record CENTER FOR INTERNET CHRISTOPHER A. HANSEN AND SOCIETY BARRY STEINHARDT CYBER LAW CLINIC AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES 559 Nathan Abbott Way UNION FOUNDATION Stanford, California 94305 125 Broad Street (650) 724-0014 New York, New York 10004 (212) 549-2500 Attorneys for Amici (Counsel continued on inside cover) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioners, —v.— BRAND X INTERNET SERVICES, ET AL., Respondents. MARJORIE HEINS ADAM H. MORSE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW 161 Avenue of the Americas 12th Floor New York, New York 10013 (212) 998-6730 Attorneys for Amici TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF AMICI ...................................................................1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE.......................................................1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ......................................................3 ARGUMENT...................................................................................5 I. The FCC is Obligated to Promote Free Speech and Privacy When Classifying and Regulating Cable Internet Service........................5 II. The FCC Ruling Allows Cable Providers to Leverage Market Dominance Over the Provision of an Internet Pipeline into Control of the Market for Internet Services.........................................................................8 III Cable Broadband is the Only Internet Service Option for Many Citizens...............................13 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Book IG 1800 British Telecom Rev A.Book
    Notice to Users ©2003 2Wire, Inc. All rights reserved. This manual in whole or in part, may not be reproduced, translated, or reduced to any machine-readable form without prior written approval. 2WIRE PROVIDES NO WARRANTY WITH REGARD TO THIS MANUAL, THE SOFTWARE, OR OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN AND HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH REGARD TO THIS MANUAL, THE SOFTWARE, OR SUCH OTHER INFORMATION, IN NO EVENT SHALL 2WIRE, INC. BE LIABLE FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, WHETHER BASED ON TORT, CONTRACT, OR OTHERWISE, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS MANUAL, THE SOFTWARE, OR OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN OR THE USE THEREOF. 2Wire, Inc. reserves the right to make any modification to this manual or the information contained herein at any time without notice. The software described herein is governed by the terms of a separate user license agreement. Updates and additions to software may require an additional charge. Subscriptions to online service providers may require a fee and credit card information. Financial services may require prior arrangements with participating financial institutions. © British Telecommunications Plc 2002. BTopenworld and the BTopenworld orb are registered trademarks of British Telecommunications plc. British Telecommunications Plc registered office is at 81 Newgate Street, London EC1A 7AJ, registered in England No. 180000. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Owner’s Record The serial number is located on the bottom of your Intelligent Gateway. Record the serial number in the space provided here and refer to it when you call Customer Care. Serial Number:__________________________ Safety Information • Use of an alternative power supply may damage the Intelligent Gateway, and will invalidate the approval that accompanies the Intelligent Gateway.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet and the Elderly in Spain: Time Dedicated to Search and Communications
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Internet and the elderly in Spain: Time dedicated to search and communications Molina, Jose Alberto and Campaña, Juan Carlos and Ortega, Raquel University of Zaragoza and IZA, University of Zaragoza, University of Zaragoza 10 October 2016 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74419/ MPRA Paper No. 74419, posted 12 Oct 2016 07:26 UTC Internet and the elderly in Spain: Time dedicated to search and communications* José Alberto Molina University of Zaragoza, Spain IZA, Germany Juan Carlos Campaña University of Zaragoza, Spain Raquel Ortega University of Zaragoza, Spain Abstract Internet use reduces the isolation or exclusion of individuals in specific socio-economic groups and, consequently, increases the quality of life, with this being especially the case for the elderly. Knowing that the elderly are becoming particularly active in dedicating time to the Internet, we provide evidence of the time that Spanish individuals aged 65 and older dedicate to two online activities: search and communications. Thus, our work contributes to the central objective of the Digital Agenda for Europa, which sets out to ensure universal broadband coverage across the European Union. We estimate a simultaneous SUR model with data from the 4,036 individuals aged 65 years (inclusive) and older from the Spanish Time Use Survey for 2009-2010. Results indicate that being male has a positive influence on the time devoted to search on the Internet, whereas age has a negative effect. Time devoted to both Internet activities increases with higher levels of education and at the highest level of individual health. By contrast, a greater number of family members has a negative influence on the time spent on search and, more so, on communications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hedonic Model for Internet Access Service in the Consumer Price Index
    Hedonic Model for Internet Access A hedonic model for Internet access service in the Consumer Price Index A hedonic model is presented for use in making direct quality adjustments to prices for Internet access service collected for the Consumer Price Index; the Box-Cox methodology for functional form selection improves the specification of the model Brendan Williams he practice of making hedonic-based The Internet access industry price adjustments to remove the ef- fects of quality changes in goods and The first commercial services allowing users services that enter into the calculation of the to access content with their personal comput- T CPI) U.S. Consumer Price Index ( has to date ers by connecting to interhousehold networks focused primarily on indexes for consumer appeared in 1979 with the debut of Com- electronics, appliances, housing, and apparel. puServe and The Source, an online service In an effort to expand the use of hedonic ad- provider bought by Reader’s Digest soon after justments to a service-oriented area of the CPI, the service was launched. The same year also this article investigates the development and marked the beginning of Usenet, a newsgroup application of a hedonic regression model for and messaging network. Early online services making direct price adjustments for quality proliferated during the 1980s, and each al- change in the index for Internet access servic- lowed users to access a limited network, but es (known as “Internet services and electronic not the Internet. information providers,” item index SEEE03). The U.S. Government’s ARPANET is com- The analysis presented builds on past research monly cited as the beginning of what we in hedonics and makes use of a Box-Cox re- now know as the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 001-09553 CBS CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 04-2949533 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 51 W. 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 (212) 975-4321 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices) Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of Each Exchange on Title of Each Class Which Registered Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value New York Stock Exchange Class B Common Stock, $0.001 par value New York Stock Exchange 7.625% Senior Debentures due 2016 American Stock Exchange 7.25% Senior Notes due 2051 New York Stock Exchange 6.75% Senior Notes due 2056 New York Stock Exchange Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933). Yes ☒ No o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Internet Project International Report 6Th Edition
    The World Internet Project International Report 6th Edition THE WORLD INTERNET PROJECT International Report ̶ Sixth Edition Jeffrey I. Cole, Ph.D. Director, USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future Founder and Organizer, World Internet Project Michael Suman, Ph.D., Research Director Phoebe Schramm, Associate Director Liuning Zhou, Ph.D., Research Associate Interns: Negin Aminian, Hany Chang, Zoe Covello, Ryan Eason, Grace Marie Laffoon‐Alejanre, Eunice Lee, Zejun Li, Cheechee Lin, Guadalupe Madrigal, Mariam Manukyan, Lauren Uba, Tingxue Yu Written by Monica Dunahee and Harlan Lebo World Internet Project International Report ̶ Sixth Edition | i WORLD INTERNET PROJECT – International Report Sixth Edition Copyright © 2016 University of Southern California COPIES You are welcome to download additional copies of The World Internet Project International Report for research or individual use. However, this report is protected by copyright and intellectual property laws, and cannot be distributed in any way. By acquiring this publication you agree to the following terms: this copy of the sixth edition of the World Internet Project International Report is for your exclusive use. Any abuse of this agreement or any distribution will result in liability for its illegal use. To download the full text and graphs in this report, go to www.digitalcenter.org. ATTRIBUTION Excerpted material from this report can be cited in media coverage and institutional publications. Text excerpts should be attributed to The World Internet Project. Graphs should be attributed in a source line to: The World Internet Project International Report (sixth edition) USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future REPRINTING Reprinting this report in any form other than brief excerpts requires permission from the USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future at the address below.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary
    2010 Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Antonio Prado Deputy Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Chief Division of Production, Productivity and Management Ricardo Pérez Chief Documents and Publications Division Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2010 is the latest edition of a series issued annually by the Unit on Investment and Corporate Strategies of the ECLAC Division of Production, Productivity and Management. It was prepared by Álvaro Calderón, Mario Castillo, René A. Hernández, Jorge Mario Martínez Piva, Wilson Peres, Miguel Pérez Ludeña and Sebastián Vergara, with assistance from Martha Cordero, Lucía Masip Naranjo, Juan Pérez, Álex Rodríguez, Indira Romero and Kelvin Sergeant. Contributions were received as well from Eduardo Alonso and Enrique Dussel Peters, consultants. Comments and suggestions were also provided by staff of the ECLAC subregional headquarters in Mexico, including Hugo Beteta, Director, and Juan Carlos Moreno-Brid, Juan Alberto Fuentes, Claudia Schatan, Willy Zapata, Rodolfo Minzer and Ramón Padilla. ECLAC wishes to express its appreciation for the contribution received from the executives and officials of the firms and other institutions consulted during the preparation of this publication. Chapters IV and V were prepared within the framework of the project “Inclusive political dialogue and exchange of experiences”, carried out jointly by ECLAC and the Alliance for the Information Society (@lis 2) with financing from the European
    [Show full text]
  • 60001533897.Pdf
    BEFORE THE Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of ) ) Applications of Comcast Corporation, ) MB Docket No. 10-56 General Electric Company ) And NBC Universal, Inc. ) ) For Consent to Assign Licenses and ) Transfer Control of Licenses ) ) Protecting and Promoting the ) GN Docket No. 14-28 Open Internet ) OPPOSITION OF COMCAST CORPORATION Kathryn A. Zachem WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP David Don 1875 K Street, N.W. Regulatory Affairs Washington, D.C. 20006 Counsel for Comcast Corporation Lynn R. Charytan Julie P. Laine Comcast NBCUniversal Transaction Compliance Francis M. Buono Ryan G. Wallach Legal Regulatory Affairs COMCAST CORPORATION 300 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001 March 14, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ............................................................................. 2 II. STREAM TV IS A CABLE SERVICE. ........................................................................... 6 A. STREAM TV IS NOT AN ONLINE VIDEO SERVICE DELIVERED OR ACCESSED OVER THE INTERNET. .......................................................... 7 B. STREAM TV MEETS THE STATUTORY DEFINITION OF A CABLE SERVICE. ........................................................................................................... 8 C. STREAM TV IS TREATED EXACTLY THE SAME AS COMCAST’S OTHER CABLE SERVICES, AND COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. ................................................................. 12 D. TITLE VI CABLE SERVICES ARE DIFFERENT FROM
    [Show full text]