DOCSLIB.ORG

Residents Fight to Protect the Shrine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Residents Fight to Protect the Shrine DECEMBER 2014 / JANUARY 2015 ISSUE 37 PRICELESS WWW.SOUTHBANKLOCALNEWS.COM.AU : SOUTHBANK_News The voice of Southbank Council compromised by Melbourne CEO refl ects on developer donations seven years at the top Page 3 Page 8 Start building our school Are you having a laugh? Page 7 Page 10 Residents fi ght to protect the Shrine By Sean Car A new community group has been launched in direct protest to current, approved and proposed Southbank developments, which cast a shadow over the Shrine of Remembrance. Freshwater Place resident and Vietnam this won’t happen and I haven’t heard from veteran Graeme Plumridge formed “Save him. So I suppose I’m just supposed to Our Shrine” last month after noticing a go away.” huge shadow being cast over the Shrine by An independent study commissioned by the new Prima Pearl development from his the Freshwater Place Owners’ Corporation apartment earlier this year. found that Australia 108 and the proposed “I think this is wrong that were shading Queensbridge Tower would both the Shrine,” he said. “I would think that all overshadow the Shrine during winter. veteran communities in Victoria would be In deliberating on overshadowing of concerned about that simply because the the Yarra River at a Future Melbourne Shrine is a revered place.” Committee meeting in August, Lord Mayor Mr Plumridge, who was conscripted in Robert Doyle stated the Yarra, the Shrine and 1967, captured images of shadows cast over State Parliament were sacrosanct. the Shrine, which he emailed to former Mr Plumridge said he and his group would Liberal Planning Minister Matthew Guy campaign vigorously to prevent any further after hearing of plans for the then proposed overshadowing of the sacred memorial. Australia 108 tower. “Th e only thing that we’ve probably still Th e former Planning Minister had got our hand on is, as everybody says, the announced the adoption of permanent and Shrine, which is sacrosanct and shouldn’t mandatory planning controls back in April, have shadows,” he said. which he stated would protect the Shrine from encroaching development. “Th e fact is Prima Pearl is already there so the boundary has shifted. Let’s see if we can After giving Mr Plumridge the same stop anymore from happening.” assurances in his responding email, the Planning Minister then in June approved Southbank Residents Group president and what will now be the tallest tower in the returned serviceman Tony Penna said he southern hemisphere. has been appalled by the lack of competency shown by the former planning minister. “I wrote to him and said that I understood that it’s going to be taller than Prima Pearl “It shouldn’t happen,” he said. and Prima Pearl was only in construction at “Overshadowing the shrine is off -limits, that point,” Mr Plumridge said. “I asked him period,” he said. how could you say this won’t shade “We will be fi ghting overshadowing of the the Shrine?” Shrine just like if it were overshadowing “He came back very succinctly and said ‘no, the Yarra.” it will not shade the Shrine or its precinct’.” “A week later 108 was approved, so I wrote An image capturing Prima Pearl in Southbank overshadowing the Shrine of Remembrance. Th e image was taken by back to him again and said how can you say Continued on page 2. Southbank resident Graeme Plumridge from his apartment at Freshwater Place. WE ARE YOUR LOCAL GROCER! 182 City Road, SOUTHBANK 2 SOUTHBANK LOCAL NEWS ISSUE 37 Season’s greetings Southbank Welcome to the fi nal edition of the ‘Southbank Local News’ for 2014. Suite 108, 198 Harbour Esplanade PO Box 23008 Docklands 8012 Tel: 8689 7980 Fax: 9602 2929 Domain and Montague underground train the Southbank community. stations, overshadowing of the Yarra and the www.southbanklocalnews.com.au To our readers – thank you for picking up Sean Car 2014 International AIDS Conference. a copy of the Southbank Local News each Editor: Sean Car And in a bid to keep our ever-growing month and for sharing your stories with us community up to speed with local events, this year. Publisher: Shane Scanlan I can also proudly say that 2014 marks the I’d like to wish all readers, contributors and achievement of a new record in size and Tel: 8689 7980 Fax: 9602 2929 advertisers a happy and safe festive season circulation of the Southbank Local News. [email protected] While I have only witnessed six months of with friends and family. news fi rst-hand since coming in as new It’s only due to the continued support of Reader contributions are welcome. Southbank Local News will be back with its editor for my predecessor Sean Rogasch in our valued advertisers that we are able to Please send articles and images to fi rst edition for 2015 in February and we look July, I can confi dently say there has been broaden our reach within the local area [email protected] forward to bringing you more news from anything but a shortage of content to fi ll our and I’d like to say a special thanks to the postcode 3006 next year. pages. local stakeholders who have invested in this Deadline for edition 38 is February 5. Some of the major stories the newspaper community asset. Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a happy new year. has covered this year have included the I’d also like to thank our regular columnists, approval of Australia 108, City Rd’s future who each month provide the newspaper Sean Car development, the announcement of the with interesting perspectives to share with Editor CONNECT Residents fi ght to protect Shrine Keep up to date with local news & events. Follow us on Twitter Continued from page 1. @SOUTHBANK_News “It’s sacrosanct and I am appalled at seeing “We want to make sure that everybody has the applications that have been approved clarity on the rules rather than the current and I believe the minister claimed that he mess of a developer-driven frenzy that Like us on Facebook was not aware, which to me says that the Matthew Guy has left behind,” he said. Southbank Local News minister is incompetent.” Mr Plumridge said “Save Our Shrine” would Mr Penna said he was disappointed by seek a meeting with Mr Wynne to demand the lack of public consultation and said he the following conditions were met to protect hoped the newly-elected Labor Government the Shrine from overshadowing: would adopt a renewed focus on the issue. Suspend any new project, which will cast “Th e minister should be aware, the minister a shadow; should be asking those questions, because Reject any new or pending applications; this is absolutely fundamental and critical. and It’s part of our heritage. It’s part of our community and it’s just wrong.” Commit the Government to enforcing planning controls, which prevent Albert Park MLA Martin Foley said his overshadowing. government, featuring newly-appointed Planning Minister Richard Wynne, was To register support on the issue visit committed to cleaning up the mess left by www.savourshrine.com.au Mr Guy. Prima Pearl tower in Southbank. Add a break back into your weekday lunch Make the most of your lunch break and admire the city from the Southgate side of the river. Dine in over an express restaurant lunch menu, or enjoy a quick bite at Melbourne’s bustling riverside food court. Fresh air and spectacular city views are on the house. ISSUE 37 SOUTHBANK LOCAL NEWS 3 Council compromised by developer donations City of Melbourne councillors were unable to consider a planning application last month because too many of them had received election campaign contributions from the developer. On November 11, the Future Melbourne Committee was left without a quorum and was, therefore, unable to consider a Southbank planning matter relating to developer Central Equity. Central Equity already has a planning permit Former Melton man Rehmat Sandhu. Image: Facebook for the site at 199 City Rd but has asked the Minister for Planning for permission to increase the height of the building from 105m to 148m and the number of City Rd apartments from 382 to 557. Th e site falls within a 100m discretionary height zone. Th e Minister has asked the council for its view on the application but councillors were death fall unable to consider the matter because four of the eight councillors present declared a A 21-year-old Melton confl ict of interest and left the room. Councillors declaring a confl ict were Cr Ken man has died after falling Ong, Cr Susan Riley, Cr Kevin Louey and Cr 20-storeys from the balcony Beverley Pinder-Mortimer. of a City Rd apartment in In the absence of a direction from Southbank. councillors, council offi cers will respond the Minister on Central Equity’s application. Th e Central Equity site on the corner of City Rd and Balston St in Southbank. Rehmat Sandhu fell from his friend’s 26th Of the four aff ected councillors, only Cr Riley fl oor City Towers apartment shortly before responded to a question from Southbank 4am on December 6. Local News on whether or not, in hindsight, last election, Th e Greens were fully aware Cr Stephen Mayne said that, despite it was appropriate to accept developer that donations accepted by a team would supporting a ban on developer A police spokesperson said Mr Sandhu contributions. apply to all members. contributions, he defended the aff ect was socialising with friends before he councillors saying a “conservative opinion” “It has always been clear,” Cr Oke said.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jeff Copolov CV.Pdf
    BATES SMART CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION SYNOPSIS / Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology After graduating from RMIT University with Fellowship Diploma of Interior Design a Fellowship Diploma of Interior Design, Jeff began his career as a set designer in the PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS television industry. He joined Bates Smart / Member of the Design Institute of Australia in 1983 and in 1995 he became the first / Fellow of the Design Institute of Australia director of interior design at Bates Smart. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE During his career Jeff has been awarded a number of prestigious accolades. In 2003 he Jeffery joined Bates Smart in 1983, received the IDEA Gold Medal for significant becoming an Associate in 1985, an contributions to the design industry and in Associate Director in 1988 and a 2010 he was awarded Designer of the Year Director in 1995. at the IDEA awards. He was inducted into JEFFERY COPOLOV Prior to joining Bates Smart: the Design Institute of Australia’s Hall of DipIntDes, FDIA / ABC Channel 2, Melbourne Fame in 2018, in recognition of outstanding Director / GTV Channel 9, Melbourne contributions to the Australian design industry. Jeff has a classically modern, timeless approach to design and a reputation for producing highly refined and carefully targeted design solutions. He is known for his relentless attention to detail. Regularly working with architectural colleagues from the outset, Jeff oversees the entire design process to craft buildings from the inside out. His broad experience covers a wide range of building types, including commercial, hospitality, residential, retail, education and health, all of which promotes a rich diversity of cross-discipline thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Action on Demolition Dust by Shine Dighe Undertook a Site Visit and Confi Rmed There Th E Construction of Melbourne’S Was Excessive Dust
    FOR THE MONTHS OF DECEMBER 2014 & JANUARY 2015 ISSUE 05 FREE WWW.CBDNEWS.COM.AU Food Events Nightlife LUNCH TIME 12 AFTER WORK 13 THE WEEKEND 14 FOODIE'S PARADISE GIRL POWER PALACE PROTEST CEO REFLECTS page 2 page 4 page 5 page 7 Little action on demolition dust By Shine Dighe undertook a site visit and confi rmed there Th e construction of Melbourne’s was excessive dust. largest-ever residential Th e demolition company, Guilfoyles, accepted this and agreed to get more hoses development on the former Age for the site. She again called site services on newspaper site in Spencer St September 9 and made a further complaint, and was informed that a notice to comply is causing serious disruptions would be issued, though it was never issued. and health problems to She said council told her it did not have an residents and businesses. environmental health team and that this was the responsibility of the EPA. Residents are frustrated that no one is Guilfoyles does not intend to contact taking responsibility for the air quality and it local residents to arrange a clean-up of appears the authorities are passing the buck. their properties until the construction is Residents, restaurants, shops and even bus completed. shelters are all bearing the brunt of the dust. Ms Tench contacted Guilfoyles requesting Echoing their problems, 270 King St building that it arrange regular cleaning until the manager Terry McKenzie, said: “We are demolition was completed but it has not suff ering from sore throats, dry eyes and done so.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Optimization Solutions for Towers on Compact Sites 3. Conference Proceeding Ctbuh.Org/Papers
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Structural Optimization Solutions for Towers on Compact Sites Authors: Mark Hennessy, Structural Director, Meinhardt Doug Wallace, Senior Structural Engineer, Meinhardt Subjects: Structural Engineering Wind Engineering Keywords: Damping Structure Wind Publication Date: 2012 Original Publication: CTBUH 2012 9th World Congress, Shanghai Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Mark Hennessy; Doug Wallace Structural Optimization Solutions for Towers on Compact Sites 紧凑型基地的高层建筑结构优化解决方案 Abstract Over the past 20 to 30 years in particular, the advent of high-strength materials and the Australian/global trend to build taller and more geometrically-complex buildings on smaller footprints has necessitated a rapid development in the technologies for the design of these buildings. The objectives of this paper are to: highlight the latest design and technical advances and associated challenges in the optimization of slender towers; demonstrate trends in the design of slender towers on small sites using Case Studies to demonstrate the considered use Mark Hennessy Doug Wallace of Tuned Liquid Dampers; and explain complexities in the optimization of the acceleration damping system in the interpretation of world’s best practice wind acceleration guidelines. Mark Hennessy & Doug Wallace Keywords: Structure, Engineering, Wind, Compact, Skyscraper, Damper Meinhardt Group 501 Swanston Street Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia tel (电话): +61 3 8676 1200 fax (传真): +61 3 8676 1201 email (电子邮箱): mark.hennessy@meinhardtgroup. 摘要 com; [email protected] www.meinhardtgroup.com 过去几十年，特别是近20至30年，随着高强度材料的问世，澳大利亚及全球范围内掀起 Mark Hennessy is Structural Director in Australia for 了在小块土地上建造多座更高、几何形状更为复杂的高层建筑的潮流，这类建筑的设计 global engineering consultancy Meinhardt Group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collection
    the collection THIRTY-FOUR OUTSTANDING DEVELOPMENT SITE OPPORTUNITIES IN MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA – SPRING 2015 #2 Welcome to the Spring Edition of The Collection, Victoria’s leading and most followed development site publication. The strong start we witnessed early on in the year has followed through to Q3 2015; supported by strong market credentials, continued historically low interest rates and increased overseas investment influenced by the falling Australian Dollar. So far this year we have seen large volumes of stock transact to both local and offshore developers, supported by continued confidence and demand in the residential sector. As Victoria’s population continues to grow, the merits of apartment living are becoming more attractive to Australian home owners and investors –whether it be for the empty nesters, the downsizers or first home owners etc. Developers have recognised this growing trend, backed by confidence and depth in the residential market and reflected in the volume of transactions moving into the 2015/2016 financial year. CBRE Victorian Development Sites team recognise the ever-changing market needs and continue to service this sector with dedicated and highly specialised sales experts to handle all buying and selling queries. We welcome you to the Spring Edition of The Collection of 2015. This edition showcases a wide range of development sites that are currently available for your purchasing consideration. Some of the sites have approved permits and some without. We also welcome you to visit the dedicated team website www.cbremelbourne.com.au which hosts all current listings and sold properties. On behalf of our team, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you all for your business in 2015 and we look forward to being of great service to you in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Sky-High Approval
    JULY 2014 ISSUE 32 PRICELESS WWW.SOUTHBANKLOCALNEWS.COM.AU : SOUTHBANK_News The voice of Southbank Council stands fi rm AIDS conference makes history See page 3 See page 7 Lobby group's new faces Storm surge smashes See page 5 See page 9 Sky-high approval Th e green light has again been given to construct Melbourne’s tallest building in Southbank. A revamped design of Australia 108 was class city and leader in modern architecture.” approved by Planning Minister Matthew Guy Th e building at 84-90 Queensbridge St is at last month, after the original approval design the corner of Queensbridge St, Kingsway was found to be intruding into airspace for overpass and City Rd. aircraft using Essendon Airport. Th e tower is 185 metres tall and will be home Th e building was one of two approved by to 295 apartments. Mr Guy in Southbank in June, having also given the green light to a new tower at 84-90 Mr Guy compared the approvals in Queensbridge St. metropolitan Melbourne favourably against metropolitan Sydney. While Mr Guy referred to the building in his press release as Australia 108, it is set “Since 2010, 54 per cent more homes have to become “the building formally known gained building approval in metropolitan as Australia 108”, given it is no longer a Melbourne than in Sydney, and 11 per cent 108-storey structure. Developer World Class more than the entire state of New South Land avoided using the name in its press Wales,” Mr Guy said. release. In describing the new version of Australia 108, Mr Guy said the central city was the right place for buildings of this nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee Agenda 6.1
    Page 1 of 193 Report to the Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee Agenda 6.1 Ministerial Planning Referral: TPMR-2019-24 3 March 2020 102-156 City Road, Southbank Presenter: Jane Birmingham, Practice Leader Land Use and Development Purpose and background 1. The purpose of this report is to advise the Future Melbourne Committee of a Ministerial Planning Application seeking approval for the demolition of the existing building; construction of a multi storey mixed use development over two towers with basements; create or alter access to a Road Zone; and remove an easement at 102-156 City Road, Southbank (refer Attachment 2 – Locality Plan). 2. The applicant is Beulah SB Developments Pty Ltd ATF Beulah Development Trust c/- Urbis Pty Ltd, the owner of the land is Beulah SB Nominees Pty Ltd and the architects are Cox Architecture and UN Studio. 3. The land is located within the Capital City Zone Schedule 3 (CCZ3); and is affected by Design and Development Overlay Schedules 1 (DDO1-A3 – Active Street Frontages), 3 (DDO3 – Traffic Conflict) and 10 (DDO10 – General Development Area); and Parking Overlay Schedule 1 (PO1 – Capital City Zone – Outside the Retail Core). A planning permit is required for the demolition of the existing building and the construction of buildings and works. 4. The application proposes demolition of the existing building on-site and the construction of a multi-storey, two tower development over a common podium and basement levels. The taller tower (East Tower) measures 365.1m (102 storeys) and the lower tower (West Tower) measures 250m (59 storeys). The height of the building requires separate approval from aviation authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C305
    PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C305 1-7 QUEENS BRIDGE STREET, SOUTHBANK & 93 – 103 CLARENDON STREET, SOUTHBANK STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE PREPARED BY STUART MCGURN JULY 2020 URBIS INTRODUCTION 1. My name is Stuart Andrew McGurn and I am a Director of Urbis Pty Ltd. My qualifications and experience are described in Appendix A. I have been instructed by Ashurst Australia on behalf of Crown Resorts Limited to undertake a town planning review of exhibited Amendment C305 to the Melbourne Planning Scheme in relation to properties at 1- 7 Queens Bridge Street and 93-103 Clarendon Street, Southbank. 2. The location of the two parcels and their context is depicted in Figure 1. Figure 1: Location of 1-7 Queens Bridge Street (red) and 93-103 Clarendon Street (purple), Southbank 3. Amendment C305 proposes to implement the recommendations of the Southbank and Fisherman’s Bend Heritage Review (June 2017) on selected land within Southbank and Fisherman’s Bend within the City of Melbourne. In total it will apply to 48 heritage places. The Statement of Significance and the Heritage Places Inventory are proposed to be Incorporated Documents in the Scheme. 4. Within the Statement of Significance, both properties fall into the precinct described as ‘Industrial South Melbourne from the Yarra River to Dorcas Street and backing on to the St Kilda Road area, including City Road, Queens Bridge Street, Sturt Street and surrounding streets in Southbank’ (p.8) 5. In respect of 93-103 Clarendon Street, Southbank, Amendment C305 proposes to apply; • A ‘site specific’ Heritage Overlay (HO1222), identified as the ‘Eckersley and Co Soda Fountain Factory’.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Future Melbourne Committee Agenda Item 6.4
    Page 1 of 283 Report to the Future Melbourne Committee Agenda item 6.4 Planning Scheme Amendment C387 Hoddle Grid Heritage (Permanent 18 May 2021 controls) Presenter: Emma Appleton, Director City Strategy Purpose and background 1. The purpose of this report is to consider the submissions received to Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C387 Hoddle Grid Heritage Permanent Controls (the Amendment) and to recommend that the Future Melbourne Committee refer all submissions listed at Attachment 2 to an independent Panel in accordance with the Planning and Environment Act 1987. 2. The Amendment implements the recommendations of the Hoddle Grid Heritage Review, 2020 (the Review) by Context and peer reviewed by GJM Heritage. It proposes to include 137 new individual heritage places and five new precincts within Heritage Overlays. Protection of these places contributes to the Grid’s hierarchy of memorable streets and laneways, and diverse precincts, attracting economic activity integral to the Victorian state economy and offering adaptable floor space within the city. 3. The Review was presented to the Future Melbourne Committee on 4 August 2020. Under delegation, management requested authorisation from the Minister for Planning to prepare and exhibit the Amendment. Exhibition was undertaken from 5 November to 17 December 2020, including a wide range of engagement activities that optimised community participation and celebrated heritage in the city. Key issues 4. Twenty-two submissions were received in support of the Amendment including from the National Trust, the Royal Historical Society of Victoria and Melbourne Heritage Action. Forty three submissions were received in opposition to inclusion of 48 places within Heritage Overlays in the Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • 21-35 Power Street & 38 Freshwater Place, Southbank
    21-35 Power Street & 38 Freshwater Place, Southbank Planning Permit Application 2013/010075 Table of contents 1 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 2 2 Recommendation ................................................................................................................ 2 3 Application Details............................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Conflict of Interest ............................................................................................................ 19 4 Background ........................................................................................................................ 3 5 Site and Surrounds.............................................................................................................. 4 6 Proposal ............................................................................................................................. 6 7 Planning Policies and Controls .............................................................................................. 7 7.1 State Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................................... 7 7.2 Local Planning Policy Framework .......................................................................................... 7 7.3 Statutory Controls (Permit Triggers) ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southbank and Fishermans Bend Heritage Review
    Southbank and Fishermans Bend Heritage Review Prepared for the City of Melbourne 23 June 2017 Vic Heritage Historical Survey Report Template Document information Biosis offices Report to: City of Melbourne AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Prepared by: Gary Vines Canberra Graeme Butler Phone: (02) 6102 1200 Biosis project no.: 23066 Email: [email protected] File name: 23066.Southbank and Fishermans Bend Heritage Review final NEW SOUTH WALES Citation: Biosis (2017). Southbank and Fishermans Bend Newcastle Heritage Review. Report for City of Port Phillip. G Phone: (02) 4911 4040 Vines, Biosis Pty Ltd, Melbourne, G Butler, Graeme Email: [email protected] Butler & Associates. Sydney Cover image: Southgate Fountain in Snowden Gardens Phone: (02) 9101 8700 Email: [email protected] Document control Wollongong Phone: (02) 4201 1090 Email: [email protected] Version Internal reviewer Date issued Draft version 01-04 GV 20/02/2017 QUEENSLAND Draft version 05 review MT 01/03/2017 Brisbane Draft version 06 review GV & RJS 28/03/2017 Phone: (07) 3831 7400 Email: [email protected] Final version GV 04/04/2017 Revised Version GV 19/04/2017 TASMANIA Proofread final CoM & GV 16/06/2017 Hobart Phone: (03) 8686 4821 Acknowledgements Email: [email protected] Biosis acknowledges the contribution of the following people and VICTORIA organisations in undertaking this study: Ballarat Phone: (03) 5304 4250 Tamara Lowen, City of Melbourne Email: [email protected] Pam Neivandt, City of Melbourne Melbourne (Head Office) Aaron Hewett, City of Port Phillip Phone: (03) 8686 4800 Fax: (03) 9646 9242 Email: [email protected] Janet Bolitho, Port Phillip Historical Society Robin Grow, Art Deco Society Wangaratta Phone: (03) 5721 9453 Emerald Hill Heritage Centre Email: [email protected] Biosis Pty Ltd This document is and shall remain the property of Biosis Pty Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Planning Scheme
    Melbourne Planning Scheme MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME Incorporated Document One Queensbridge, 1-29 Queens Bridge Street, Southbank (Crown’s Queensbridge Hotel Tower), February 2017 This document is an incorporated document in the Melbourne Planning Scheme pursuant to Section 6(2)(j) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 Page 1 of 20 Melbourne Planning Scheme INTRODUCTION This document is an incorporated document in the schedule to Clause 52.03 and the schedule to Clause 81 of the Melbourne Planning Scheme. The land identified in the document may be developed in accordance with the specific controls contained in the document. The land identified in the document may not be developed in accordance with the specific controls contained in the document for a use other than that approved by the document. The specific controls may exclude other controls in the Scheme. If there is any inconsistency between the specific controls and the general provisions of the Scheme, the specific controls will prevail. ADDRESS OF THE LAND This document applies to land at 1-29 Queens Bridge Street, Southbank and land adjacent to these sites described as follows: 1-7 Queens Bridge Street, Southbank (Lot 1 on Title Plan 369606P and Lot 2 PS332539X) 9-15 Queens Bridge Street, Southbank (Lot 1 on Title Plan 873768Y) 17-23 Queens Bridge Street, Southbank (Lot B on Plan of Subdivision 504017Y) 25-29 Queens Bridge Street, Southbank (Lot 1 of Plan of Subdivision 505293S) 1-8 Whiteman Street (Allot. 58e City of South Melbourne, Parish of Melbourne South) OP112471 Queensbridge Square (Allot. 2170 City of South Melbourne, Parish of Melbourne South, Allot.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Jacobs' Report
    GDFS.0001.002.0001 27 November 2015 HAZELWOOD MINE FIRE SECOND INQUIRY REVIEW OF JACOBS' REPORT Submitted to: King & Wood Mallesons Level 50, Bourke Place 600 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Report Number. 1542819-001-R-Rev0 Distribution: REPORT 1 Copy - King & Wood Mallesons 1 Copy - Golder Associates Pty Ltd GDFS.0001.002.0002 HAZELWOOD MINE FIRE SECOND INQUIRY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Engagement ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Summary of qualifications and experience...................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Questions ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Relied Upon Information .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Question 1 – Approved Final Rehabilitation Model ......................................................................................... 3 2.2 Question 2 – Other Practical Alternatives
    [Show full text]