Structural Optimization Solutions for Towers on Compact Sites 3. Conference Proceeding Ctbuh.Org/Papers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
THE REGISTRY MEL5CI '!\1 ': T (ACN 115 145 134) ~------Respondents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA No M 253 of2015 MELBOURNE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRY Between CROWN MELBOURNE LTD (ACN 006 973 262) Appellant COSMOPOLITAN HOTEL (VIC) PTY L TD (ACN 115 145 198) FISH AND COMPANY (VIC) PTY LTD THE REGISTRY MEL5CI '!\1 ': t (ACN 115 145 134) ~------------------- Respondents APPELLANT'S CHRONOLOGY Part 1: Certification These submissions are in a form suitable for publication on the internet. Pa.. t TT • .a a-.. .a..a.. l'b'-' ...a onoln~,la.av•veJ' ''·?-::.: l, ,, ~ ~~i. Date I~{ Event ,_j,~~T ;t~ ;:.,;~ ,Y ' ReJer~p.ce ,•· . - .,. ~ 1997 The restaurants 'Cafe Greco' and 'Waterfront' commence Tribunal operation in the Crown Casino complex, under leases Reasons [2] between Crown and two companies controlled by Mr Nick Zampelis, to expire on 31 May 2005. October- Mr Boesley on behalf of Crown first writes to Mr Tribunal November 2004 Zampelis, enquiring about his intentions in relation to Reasons [42] the 'Cafe Greco' and 'Waterfront' premises after the existing leases expire. 5 May 2005 Crown sends summaries of the terms and conditions of Tribunal proposed new leases to Mr Zampelis, which involve a 5 Reasons [44] year term and a major refurbishment of the premises 31 May 2005 The first leases for the 'Cafe Greco' and 'Waterfront' Tribunal premises expire Reasons [3] 1 Terms defined in the Appellant's submissions dated 29th January 2016 have the same meaning in this chronology Filed on behalf of the Applicant Date of Filing 29 January 2016 Minter Ellison Tel Minter Ellison Rialto Towers Fax Rialto Towers 525 Collins -
Planning and Environment Act 1987 MELBOURNE PLANNING
Planning and Environment Act 1987 MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C 52 EXPLANATORY REPORT Who is the Planning Authority? This amendment has been prepared by the Minister for Planning. The Minister for Planning is the Planning Authority for this amendment. Land affectedby the Amendment. The amendment applies to: l. 4 Lloyd Street, Kensington which is part of Certificate of Title Volume 4364, Folio 872800. 2. Dock Link Road, West Melbourne, south of Dynon Road. 3. Kitz Lane, Melbourne. What the Amendment does. The amendment inserts a new Incorporated document titled 'Simplot Australia head office, Kensington, October 200 I', in the schedule to Clause 81 and the schedule to Clause 52.03 (Specific Sites and Exclusions) that permits the use and development of the land for the purpose of Office and ancillary car park in accordance with endorsed plans. If development is proposed that is inconsistent with the incorporated document, then consent from the responsible authorityis required. Map 4 PAO (Public Acquisition Overlay) shows an overlay PA07 over part of Dock Link Road West Melbourne, but the schedule to the overlay at Clause 45.01 of the Melbourne Planning Scheme makes no reference to PA07. Dock Link Road is now constructed and the overlay can be deleted in part, with renumbering the portion of PA07 along Dynon Road between Dock Link Road and the railway bridge to PAO 3 which has the effect of making the schedule correct. The amendment also corrects a mapping anomaly in relation to Kitz Lane. The PA06 overlay on Map 13 PAO has a number of parts, and the part in relation to Kitz Lane is no longer required. -
Schedule to Clause 52.03 Specific Sites and Exclusions Gc82
MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME 26/06/2018 SCHEDULE TO CLAUSE 52.03 SPECIFIC SITES AND EXCLUSIONS GC82 1.0 Specific sites and exclusions 26/06/2018 GC82 Address of land Title of incorporated document Kensington Banks Redevelopment Site, Kensington Banks Development Plan Kensington (Subdivisions) 42 Clarendon Street, South Melbourne Sky sign - 42 Clarendon Street, South Melbourne 766 Elizabeth Street, Carlton High wall signs - 766 Elizabeth Street, Carlton Former Queen Victoria Hospital Site, Former Queen Victoria Hospital Site, Melbourne Open Lot Car Park, Melbourne 346-376 Queen Street, 334-346 La Trobe 346-376 Queen Street, 334-346 La Trobe Street and 142-171 A'Beckett Street Street and 142-171 A'Beckett Street Open Lot Car Park, Melbourne 218 Berkeley Street, 243, 249, 251 and University of Melbourne, University Square 253 Grattan Street, Vol 9586 Fol 585 Campus, Carlton, November 1999 153 Barry Street, Vol 8277 Fol 993 155 Barry Street, Vol 8277 Fol 994 157 Barry Street, Vol 8733 Fol 185 159 Barry Street, Vol 8252 Fol 839 161-163 Barry Street, Vol 8273 Fol 464 95 Barry Street, Vol 8651 Fol 154 97 Barry Street, Vol 4454 Fol 890686 99 Barry Street, Vol 9310 Fol 338 101 Barry Street, Vol 990 Fol 598 103-105 Barry Street, Vol 2659 Fol 700 107 Barry Street, Vol 9605 Fol 235 109 Barry Street, Vol 9605 Fol 236 111-117 Barry Street, Vol 9968 Fol 851, Vol 4744 Fol 948694 and Vol 6549 Fol 1309658 119-129 Barry Street, Vol 10042 Fol 777 Part (combined with 131-137 Barry Street and 200 Berkeley) 179-187 Pelham Street, Vol 8149 Fol 784 Leicester Street, -
Fishermans Bend Planning Review Panel Urban Design Report
Fishermans Bend Planning Review Panel Urban Design Report April 2018 Published by: City of Port Phillip Private Bag No 3 PO St Kilda Victoria 3182 © City of Port Phillip, March 2018 All rights reserved. This publication is protected by copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, or otherwise permitted under Part III of the Copyright Act 1968, no part of these materials may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the City of Port Phillip. 2 Fishermans Bend Urban Design Report Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 3.0 Creating a high quality, high amenity public realm ............................. 50 1.1 Purpose of this report ....................................................................................................... 6 Street wall heights .............................................................................................................50 1.2 Scope of this report ........................................................................................................... 7 Street walls - technical issues .........................................................................................52 1.3 3D modelling methodology and assumptions .............................................................. 8 Building to side and rear boundaries on narrow lots ...............................................54 DDO and preferred models ............................................................................................ -
Jeff Copolov CV.Pdf
BATES SMART CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION SYNOPSIS / Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology After graduating from RMIT University with Fellowship Diploma of Interior Design a Fellowship Diploma of Interior Design, Jeff began his career as a set designer in the PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS television industry. He joined Bates Smart / Member of the Design Institute of Australia in 1983 and in 1995 he became the first / Fellow of the Design Institute of Australia director of interior design at Bates Smart. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE During his career Jeff has been awarded a number of prestigious accolades. In 2003 he Jeffery joined Bates Smart in 1983, received the IDEA Gold Medal for significant becoming an Associate in 1985, an contributions to the design industry and in Associate Director in 1988 and a 2010 he was awarded Designer of the Year Director in 1995. at the IDEA awards. He was inducted into JEFFERY COPOLOV Prior to joining Bates Smart: the Design Institute of Australia’s Hall of DipIntDes, FDIA / ABC Channel 2, Melbourne Fame in 2018, in recognition of outstanding Director / GTV Channel 9, Melbourne contributions to the Australian design industry. Jeff has a classically modern, timeless approach to design and a reputation for producing highly refined and carefully targeted design solutions. He is known for his relentless attention to detail. Regularly working with architectural colleagues from the outset, Jeff oversees the entire design process to craft buildings from the inside out. His broad experience covers a wide range of building types, including commercial, hospitality, residential, retail, education and health, all of which promotes a rich diversity of cross-discipline thought. -
Melbourne Planning Scheme Incorporated Document November 2002
MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME Incorporated Document November 2002 Rialto South Tower Communications Facility Melbourne, November 2002 This document is an incorporated document in the Melbourne Planning Scheme pursuant to Section 6(2)(j) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 Melbourne Planning Scheme Incorporated Document November 2002 INTRODUCTION: This document is an incorporated document in the schedule to Clause 81 of the Melbourne Planning Scheme. The land identified in the document may be developed and used in accordance with the specific controls contained in the document. The specific controls may exclude other controls in the Scheme. If there is any inconsistency between the specific controls and the general provisions of the Scheme, the specific controls will prevail. ADDRESS OF THE LAND: South Tower of the Rialto Towers building at 525 Collins Street, Melbourne. THIS DOCUMENT ALLOWS: Use and development of the rooftop of the Rialto South Tower for the purposes of a Utility Installation (Communications Tower), generally in accordance with the plans (Drawing Nos 4744 TP – 01, 02 and 03) prepared by Perrott Lyon Mathieson Pty Ltd dated April 2001. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS DOCUMENT: 1. The use and development shown on the endorsed plans must not be altered or modified without the consent of the Responsible Authority. 2. Prior to commencement of development the following must be submitted to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority: 2.1 A schedule of all external materials, colour and finishes; 2.2 A reflectivity assessment report of all visibly reflective material. Such materials shall be of a type that does not reflect more than 15% of visible light; 2.3 An acoustic report, prepared by a suitably qualified expert, of the proposed structure including recommendations for any necessary modifications which must be made to the design of the tower to reduce any adverse noise conditions. -
Public Sector Capital Works Program 1995-96
PUBLIC SECTOR CAPITAL WORKS PROGRAM 1995-96 Presented, by The Honourable Alan Stockdale, M.P. Treasurer of the State of Victoria for the information of Honourable Members BUDGET INFORMATION PAPER No. 1 BY AUTHORITY, VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER 1995 Public Sector Capital Works 1995-96 Page i Public Sector Capital Works Program 1995-96 (1995-96 Budget Information Paper No. 1) Published by THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY AND FINANCE © State of Victoria 1995 This book is copyright No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act. Address all inquiries to The Secretary The Department of Treasury and Finance 1 Treasuiy Place Melbourne Victoria Australia 3002 ISSN 1035-4964 ISBN 0 7306 7975 6 Published September 1995 by authority Victorian Government Printer Page ii Public Sector Capital Works 1995-96 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Victorian Public Sector Capital Works Planning 3 Chapter 2 Public Sector Capital Works Program, 1995-96 - Summary 15 Chapter 3 Budget Sector Capital Works Program 25 Parliament 27 Agriculture, Energy and Minerals 28 Arts, Sport and Tourism 29 Business and Employment 31 Conservation and Natural Resources 32 Education 34 Health and Community Services 52 Justice 55 Planning and Development 57 Premier and Cabinet 59 Transport 60 Treasury and Finance 66 Chapter 4 Non-Budget Sector Capital Works Program 68 Country Fire Authority 70 Gas Transmission Corporation 72 Gascor 73 Gippsland and Southern Rural Water 75 Goulburn-Murray Rural Water 76 Melbourne Parks -
52-60 Collins St Melbourne
© The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2019 Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. Contents Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Subject site and surrounds ............................................................................................................................ 5 Proposal ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Planning policies and controls .................................................................................................................... 11 Referrals & Notice ......................................................................................................................................... -
'Iconic Development'
U H P H 2 0 1 6 I c o n s : T h e M a k i n g , M e a n i n g a n d U n d o i n g o f U r b a n I c o n s a n d I c o n i c C i t i e s | 554 ‘Iconic development’ Is there such a thing? Ms Gregoria Taylor Deakin University [email protected] Dr Beau Beza and Dr David Jones Deakin University By way of definition, dictionaries such as the Oxford Dictionary note that the word ‘icon’ is a noun meaning ‘a person or thing regarded as a representative symbol or as worthy of veneration’ (p. 654). More recently, the phrase ‘iconic development’ has crept into the town planning vernacular making reference to built or planned works that are intended to be an urban ‘benchmark’. However, in terms of planning practice in the State of Victoria, Australia, the meaning of ‘iconic development’ is unclear amongst property development professionals – one only needs to peruse the local newspaper, The Age on any given week and publications by key bodies such as the Planning Institute of Australia, the Victorian Planning and Environment Law Association, the Urban Development Institute of Australia and the Property Council of Australia on their websites and in professional newsletters, to appreciate the different ways the phrase is used in the property development context. This paper reports on key themes arising from interviews with 52 Victorian property development professionals, who were interviewed to determine their perceptions about what constitutes ‘iconic development’ in Victoria. -
Little Action on Demolition Dust by Shine Dighe Undertook a Site Visit and Confi Rmed There Th E Construction of Melbourne’S Was Excessive Dust
FOR THE MONTHS OF DECEMBER 2014 & JANUARY 2015 ISSUE 05 FREE WWW.CBDNEWS.COM.AU Food Events Nightlife LUNCH TIME 12 AFTER WORK 13 THE WEEKEND 14 FOODIE'S PARADISE GIRL POWER PALACE PROTEST CEO REFLECTS page 2 page 4 page 5 page 7 Little action on demolition dust By Shine Dighe undertook a site visit and confi rmed there Th e construction of Melbourne’s was excessive dust. largest-ever residential Th e demolition company, Guilfoyles, accepted this and agreed to get more hoses development on the former Age for the site. She again called site services on newspaper site in Spencer St September 9 and made a further complaint, and was informed that a notice to comply is causing serious disruptions would be issued, though it was never issued. and health problems to She said council told her it did not have an residents and businesses. environmental health team and that this was the responsibility of the EPA. Residents are frustrated that no one is Guilfoyles does not intend to contact taking responsibility for the air quality and it local residents to arrange a clean-up of appears the authorities are passing the buck. their properties until the construction is Residents, restaurants, shops and even bus completed. shelters are all bearing the brunt of the dust. Ms Tench contacted Guilfoyles requesting Echoing their problems, 270 King St building that it arrange regular cleaning until the manager Terry McKenzie, said: “We are demolition was completed but it has not suff ering from sore throats, dry eyes and done so. -
Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers
kupidonia.com Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers 1. What is the figurative name given to the buildings on Federation Square for their irregular shape? Shards Pieces Scraps 2. How tall is The Melbourne Star Ferris wheel? 85 metre 100 metre 120 metre Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers - 1 / 4 kupidonia.com 3. In what year was the Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria in Melbourne founded? 1716 1846 1912 4. The oldest park in Melbourne is ____ Royal Park Hislop Park Flagstaff Gardens 5. To whom was the Shrine of Remembrance originally dedicated? To all Australians who died in all wars. To Australians who died in World War II. To the residents of Victoria who served in the army during World War I. 6. Which statement about Melbourne's Queen Victoria Market is true? It is the most visited market in Australia. This market has been completely destroyed three times. It is the largest open air market in the Southern Hemisphere. 7. Which Melbourne skyscraper is the tallest? Eureka Tower Nauru House Bourke Place 8. How many upturned bells are there in the Bells of the Federation installation? 25 102 39 9. Which zoo was the model for the Melbourne Zoo? Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers - 2 / 4 kupidonia.com The London Zoo The Berlin Zoological Garden The Central Park Zoo in New York City 10. What is the name of the park in Melbourne where the Royal Exhibition Building is located? Fitzroy Gardens Carlton Gardens Surrey Gardens Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers - 3 / 4 kupidonia.com Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers Right answers 1. -
Report to the Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee Agenda 6.1
Page 1 of 193 Report to the Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee Agenda 6.1 Ministerial Planning Referral: TPMR-2019-24 3 March 2020 102-156 City Road, Southbank Presenter: Jane Birmingham, Practice Leader Land Use and Development Purpose and background 1. The purpose of this report is to advise the Future Melbourne Committee of a Ministerial Planning Application seeking approval for the demolition of the existing building; construction of a multi storey mixed use development over two towers with basements; create or alter access to a Road Zone; and remove an easement at 102-156 City Road, Southbank (refer Attachment 2 – Locality Plan). 2. The applicant is Beulah SB Developments Pty Ltd ATF Beulah Development Trust c/- Urbis Pty Ltd, the owner of the land is Beulah SB Nominees Pty Ltd and the architects are Cox Architecture and UN Studio. 3. The land is located within the Capital City Zone Schedule 3 (CCZ3); and is affected by Design and Development Overlay Schedules 1 (DDO1-A3 – Active Street Frontages), 3 (DDO3 – Traffic Conflict) and 10 (DDO10 – General Development Area); and Parking Overlay Schedule 1 (PO1 – Capital City Zone – Outside the Retail Core). A planning permit is required for the demolition of the existing building and the construction of buildings and works. 4. The application proposes demolition of the existing building on-site and the construction of a multi-storey, two tower development over a common podium and basement levels. The taller tower (East Tower) measures 365.1m (102 storeys) and the lower tower (West Tower) measures 250m (59 storeys). The height of the building requires separate approval from aviation authorities.