Planning and Environment Act 1987 MELBOURNE PLANNING
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
52-60 Collins St Melbourne
© The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2019 Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. Contents Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Subject site and surrounds ............................................................................................................................ 5 Proposal ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Planning policies and controls .................................................................................................................... 11 Referrals & Notice ......................................................................................................................................... -
Structural Optimization Solutions for Towers on Compact Sites 3. Conference Proceeding Ctbuh.Org/Papers
ctbuh.org/papers Title: Structural Optimization Solutions for Towers on Compact Sites Authors: Mark Hennessy, Structural Director, Meinhardt Doug Wallace, Senior Structural Engineer, Meinhardt Subjects: Structural Engineering Wind Engineering Keywords: Damping Structure Wind Publication Date: 2012 Original Publication: CTBUH 2012 9th World Congress, Shanghai Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Mark Hennessy; Doug Wallace Structural Optimization Solutions for Towers on Compact Sites 紧凑型基地的高层建筑结构优化解决方案 Abstract Over the past 20 to 30 years in particular, the advent of high-strength materials and the Australian/global trend to build taller and more geometrically-complex buildings on smaller footprints has necessitated a rapid development in the technologies for the design of these buildings. The objectives of this paper are to: highlight the latest design and technical advances and associated challenges in the optimization of slender towers; demonstrate trends in the design of slender towers on small sites using Case Studies to demonstrate the considered use Mark Hennessy Doug Wallace of Tuned Liquid Dampers; and explain complexities in the optimization of the acceleration damping system in the interpretation of world’s best practice wind acceleration guidelines. Mark Hennessy & Doug Wallace Keywords: Structure, Engineering, Wind, Compact, Skyscraper, Damper Meinhardt Group 501 Swanston Street Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia tel (电话): +61 3 8676 1200 fax (传真): +61 3 8676 1201 email (电子邮箱): mark.hennessy@meinhardtgroup. 摘要 com; [email protected] www.meinhardtgroup.com 过去几十年,特别是近20至30年,随着高强度材料的问世,澳大利亚及全球范围内掀起 Mark Hennessy is Structural Director in Australia for 了在小块土地上建造多座更高、几何形状更为复杂的高层建筑的潮流,这类建筑的设计 global engineering consultancy Meinhardt Group. -
Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers
kupidonia.com Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers 1. What is the figurative name given to the buildings on Federation Square for their irregular shape? Shards Pieces Scraps 2. How tall is The Melbourne Star Ferris wheel? 85 metre 100 metre 120 metre Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers - 1 / 4 kupidonia.com 3. In what year was the Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria in Melbourne founded? 1716 1846 1912 4. The oldest park in Melbourne is ____ Royal Park Hislop Park Flagstaff Gardens 5. To whom was the Shrine of Remembrance originally dedicated? To all Australians who died in all wars. To Australians who died in World War II. To the residents of Victoria who served in the army during World War I. 6. Which statement about Melbourne's Queen Victoria Market is true? It is the most visited market in Australia. This market has been completely destroyed three times. It is the largest open air market in the Southern Hemisphere. 7. Which Melbourne skyscraper is the tallest? Eureka Tower Nauru House Bourke Place 8. How many upturned bells are there in the Bells of the Federation installation? 25 102 39 9. Which zoo was the model for the Melbourne Zoo? Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers - 2 / 4 kupidonia.com The London Zoo The Berlin Zoological Garden The Central Park Zoo in New York City 10. What is the name of the park in Melbourne where the Royal Exhibition Building is located? Fitzroy Gardens Carlton Gardens Surrey Gardens Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers - 3 / 4 kupidonia.com Melbourne Attractions Quiz: 10 Trivia Questions and Answers Right answers 1. -
The Highest Residences in the Southern Hemisphere
THE HIGHEST RESIDENCES IN THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE 70 SOUTHBANK BOULEVARD ARTIST IMPRESSION Australia 108, luxury skyhomes in the heart of the world’s most liveable city. Melbourne, Australia. ARTIST IMPRESSION “Australia 108 is a highly sculptural residential by the Commonwealth Star on the Australian tower unlike any other in Australia. The starburst flag and is an obvious celebration of the sense which contains the resident facilities is inspired of community within the building.” MELBOURNE ARTIST IMPRESSION BESPOKE LUXURY THE BEAUTY INSIDE Australia 108 is designed by world “The interior design builds on the feminine renowned architects Fender Katsalidis. curves of the architecture. Envisioned Karl Fender and Nonda Katsalidis have as a ‘queen,’ the building shimmers produced some of the finest buildings in with an appropriately majestic colour Australia and around the world. palette – a luxurious hotel-style scheme The firm’s latest architectural masterpiece with an understated materiality of rich is a highly sculptural residential tower natural textures.” Carr Design Group has unlike any other in Australia. Its slender a fascination for putting all the design form is highlighted at the higher levels subtleties together to create beautiful by a golden starburst expression and then solutions that are very strong. ARTIST IMPRESSION morphs into a curvaceous profile against Led by the much lauded Sue Carr, Carr the sky. The starburst which contains Design Group is one of Australia’s most the resident facilities is inspired by the influential multidisciplinary design firms. Commonwealth Star on the Australian flag Their building designs are distinctive, often very sculptural in form. The Award-winning architect and new National For over 40 years, the group has maintained Australia. -
Publicly Accessible Private Plazas in Central Melbourne Amendment C308 Supplementary Analysis City of Melbourne Introduction
PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE PRIVATE PLAZAS IN CENTRAL MELBOURNE AMENDMENT C308 SUPPLEMENTARY ANALYSIS CITY OF MELBOURNE INTRODUCTION Response to Submissions This research report was prepared in response to submissions received to the exhibition of • Clarification is sought on whether this provision Amendment C308: Urban Design in the Central City calls for a 50% retention of the existing plaza as and Southbank. it is or 50% of the existing plaza area. The report specifically focuses on the following • The provision fails to recognise that there provision within the proposed Design Development may be circumstances where built form on or Overlay Schedule 1 (DDO1): above existing plazas would achieve a superior outcome when compared with the protection of Retain a minimum of 50% of any existing publicly 50% of an existing plaza. accessible private plaza oriented to a main street or street that contributes to reducing pedestrian • The requirement to retain a minimum 50% congestion or where there is good potential of existing publicly accessible private plazas through retrofit and repurposing to achieve a high demands the provision of public open space on quality space with opportunities for stationary private land, which albeit discretionary, removes activity. the level playing field for negotiation. A summary of the submissions relevant to this • The publicly accessible private plazas provision are outlined below: requirement inhibits development and places a burden on any future redevelopment efforts. • This requirement makes no distinction between the qualities of the existing plazas within the Responses to these submissions were presented to Hoddle Grid, ie whether all existing plazas are of the Future Melbourne Committee on 20 November, a quality worthy of protection. -
MELBOURNE: SETTLEMENT to GOLD 21,221 Words, 23 May 2012
School of Design (TAFE) MELBOURNE: SETTLEMENT TO GOLD 21,221 words, 23 May 2012 Week 26 Terms Sod, wattle and daub, slab, adobe, cob, Pattern Book. Background Journey to Australia. Trauma of settlement in the wilderness. No building skills. Buildings first influenced by English rural vernacular. Historic development Settlement at Sorrento, 1803. Failed, due to a source of sufficent fresh water. Settlement at Corinella, Western Port Bay, 1826. Only some bricks survive. Melbourne was settled in 1835, illegally, by land-hungry pastoralists from Launceston. The District of Port Phillip, in the Colony of New South Wales was imposed on the settlers. Although not generally acknowledged as such, it was the only settlement in Australia unsanctioned by any government. Gold was discovered in 1851, at Warrandyte and Clunes: instant wealth. Gold towns Clunes. Building types: cottages, post office, banks, rail link (in 1862 to Ballarat and 1864 to Castlemaine), hotels, store, town hall, and schools particularly following the Education Act, 1873. Primitive buildings: material types Thatch, eg: haystacks and barns using reeds, near Hopetoun. 1 School of Design (TAFE) Sod, eg: at Parwan. This was the main material for early Melbourne, particularly for labourers houses. The was turf selected, mown, ploughed, and cut with a hatchet. Walls were 1,300 mm thick. Bark, eg: at the Seven Creeks Station, near Longford. Roofing and cladding. Poles frame and holding down. Axe cut, singed. Wood pegs fixing. They lasted 10-12 years. Two men could strip 40 - 60 trees/day. Wattle and Daub, eg: near Alberton, French Island and at Bacchus Marsh. More sophisticated, generally not in Melbourne. -
CBD News Edition 65 – June 2020
June 2020, Issue 65 The Voice of Postcode 3000 见22 页 cbdnews.com.au Forever Free Twitter @CBD_News_3000 Complaints soar amid extended city construction hours The City of Melbourne’s fast-tracked approval of out-of-hours construction permits in March has resulted in construction-related noise complaints more than doubling compared to last year. words by Sean Car Protecting health is more important BUILDING in a pandemic, not less.” Cr Reece said that while con- struction had increased by 50 per The council’s chair of planning Cr cent in the municipality outside of Nicholas Reece told CBD News that normal construction hours in April more than 100 out-of-hours permits compared to November last year, the were issued for building sites in the temporary measures were not being CBD between March 30 and May applied as a “blanket approval.” 3. A council spokesperson wouldn’t “They are being administered on a confirm how many more had been case-by-case basis under the existing issued since. local law via ‘out-of-hours’ permits,” While Cr Reece said that the he said. extended construction hours The city’s Local Law currently responded to COVID-19 by helping allows for construction activity to Laneway Greens chefs Warren Flanagan (left) and Ash Ellis (right) represent keep the industry viable during occur between the hours of 7am and Hoping to survive one of a small number of local businesses who’ve been forging ahead as the uncertain times, his assistant chair of 7pm on weekdays and between 8am Photo by Rhonda Dredge CBD’s cafes, restaurants and bars prepare for restrictions easing in June. -
CTBUH Research Paper Title: the Post-Miesian Office Tower and The
CTBUH Research Paper ctbuh.org/papers Title: The Post-Miesian Office Tower and the Global Issue of Its Interpretation Author: Giorgio Marfella, University of Melbourne Subjects: Architectural/Design History, Theory & Criticism Urban Design Keywords: Development Form Height Historic Context Office Urban Planning Publication Date: 2018 Original Publication: International Journal of High-Rise Buildings Volume 7 Number 2 Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Giorgio Marfella International Journal of High-Rise Buildings International Journal of June 2018, Vol 7, No 2, 127-140 High-Rise Buildings https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2018.7.2.127 www.ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/index.php The Post-Miesian Office Tower and the Global Issue of Its Interpretation Giorgio Marfella† Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Australia Abstract The skylines of many cities worldwide are still defined by the dominant and ubiquitous office blocks of the twentieth century. While there is consensus stating that future tall building typologies should depart substantially from these past models, the inheritance of large and obsolete tall office building stocks presents a problem of global significance. Too old for present corporate models, but too new for gaining public historical importance, the twentieth-century office tower is a typology under threat of extinction. However, the need for a culturally informed strategy of preservation for that generation of tall buildings is seldom advocated. Drawing evidence from the case of Melbourne, Australia, this article presents a methodological pathway to overcome pitfalls of memory and interpretation, which commonly prevent an unbiased assessment of the value and urban contribution of late-twentieth-century skyscrapers.