NIGER Community Action Program and Community-Based Integrated Ecosystem Management Project Phase I and II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NIGER Community Action Program and Community-Based Integrated Ecosystem Management Project Phase I and II NIGER Community Action Program and Community-Based Integrated Ecosystem Management Project Phase I and II Report No. 155367 DECEMBER 31, 2020 © 2021 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank. 2021. Niger—Community Action Program and Community-Based Integrated Ecosystem Management Project. Independent Evaluation Group, Project Performance Assessment Report 155367. Washington, DC: World Bank. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected]. Report No.: 155367 PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT NIGER COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM (CAP-1) AND COMMUNITY-BASED INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT (IDA-H3460, IDA-H0250, TF-52053) AND COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM (CAP-2) AND COMMUNITY-BASED INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT (APL PHASE II) (IDA-H4230, TF-92411) December 31, 2020 Financial, Private Sector, and Sustainable Development Independent Evaluation Group Abbreviations AIP annual investment plan CAP Community Action Program CDD community-driven development CDP communal development plan GEF Global Environment Facility ICR Implementation Completion and Results Report IDA International Development Association IEG Independent Evaluation Group LDP local development plan LIF local investment fund M&E monitoring and evaluation NGO nongovernmental organization PCU Project Coordination Unit PDO project development objective PMU Project Management Unit PPAR Project Performance Assessment Report All dollar amounts are U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. IEG Management and PPAR Team Director-General, Independent Evaluation Ms. Alison Evans Director, Financial, Private Sector, and Sustainable Development Mr. José C. Carbajo Manager, Infrastructure and Sustainable Development Mr. Christopher Nelson Task Manager Ms. Lauren Kelly This report was prepared by Lauren Kelly and Christian Freymeyer who assessed the project in July 2019 and prepared this report, with the support of Joy Butscher, Omar Moumouni, Oumou Moumouni, and Aminou Rio Rio. The report was peer reviewed by Matt Turner and panel reviewed by Jack van Holst Pellekaan. Vibhuti Khanna and Viktoriya Yevsyeyeva provided administrative support. ii Contents Project Data ....................................................................................................................................................... vi Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... viii What Worked ............................................................................................................................................. viii What Didn’t Work ........................................................................................................................................ x Risks to the Sustainability of Development Outcomes................................................................... xi Lessons ........................................................................................................................................................... xi 1. Background, Context, and Design ......................................................................................................... 1 2. Objective, Financing, Theory of Change, and Program Design .................................................. 3 Theory of Change ........................................................................................................................................4 CAP Design .................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. What Worked, What Didn’t Work, and Why? ................................................................................... 9 A. Intended and Achieved Results .......................................................................................................... 9 CAP-1 Results ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 CAP-2 Results ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 B. What Worked ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Support for Niger’s Decentralization Process ................................................................................................ 15 The Contribution of Microprojects to Participatory Local Planning and Development .................. 18 Microprojects Were Profitable, and Environmental Projects Were the Best Performers. .............. 20 Land Regeneration Projects Enabled Many Short-Term, Vulnerability-Reducing Benefits. .......... 22 CAP Investments in Human Capital Effectively Supported Sustainable Land Management Practices, but Support Has Waned since the Project Closed................................................................... 25 C. What Didn’t Work ................................................................................................................................ 27 Niger’s Decentralization Process Is Ongoing but Fragile. ......................................................................... 27 Despite CAP’s Rural Decentralization Goals, A High Share of Microprojects Went to Urban Areas Near the Capital. ......................................................................................................................................... 29 Many Land Restoration Aims Were Achieved, but There Was a Lack of Adequate Finance to Oversee and Maintain the Land-Related Benefits. ...................................................................................... 34 Customary Land Tenure Arrangements at Regeneration Sites Lacked Clarity, Which Undermined the Potential for Wider Distributional Outcomes. ............................................................. 35 Neglected Pastoral Issues .................................................................................................................................... 37 4. Lessons .......................................................................................................................................................... 39 iii Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................................... 41 Boxes Box 1.1. The Great Green Wall ........................................................................................................................ 3 Box 3.1. Migrating Youths Earn Meager Living Abroad ..................................................................... 26 Box 3.2. Budgets for Social Services Decline in Diffa as National Security Spending Grows ....... 30 Figures Figure 2.1. CAP Theory of Change ............................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3.1. CAP-1 Intended Objectives and Actual Decentralization-Related Results ............... 10 Figure 3.2. CAP-1 Intended and Actual Land- and Resource-Related Results ............................ 12 Figure 3.3. CAP-2 Intended Objectives and Actual Decentralization and Resource Mobilization–Related Results ....................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 3.4. CAP-2 Intended and Actual Land- and Resource-Related Results ........................... 14 Figure 3.5. Actual Annual Public Budget Transfers as Percentage of Requested Budgets (Annual Average 2014–17), by Commune ............................................................................................... 16 Figure 3.6. Average Annual Commune Public Budget (2014–16) for Six Regions Analyzed Compared with CAP-3 Financing (2014–16) ........................................................................................... 17 Figure 3.7. CAP-1 and CAP-2 Projects Located in the Chef Lieux, by Region ............................. 18 Figure 3.8. The Greening of the Sahel (1981–2014) .............................................................................. 23 igure 3.9. Average Commune Budget, Average per Capita
Recommended publications
  • UNHCR Niger Operation UNHCR Database
    FACTSHEET DIFFA REGION NIGER Almost 6,500 new arrivals in Sayam Forage Camp since January 2021 March 2021 NNNovember The Diffa region hosts 265,696* Since April 2019, movements are The security situation has a strong Nigerian refugees, internally restricted on many roads following negative impact on the economy of displaced persons and Nigerien attacks, kidnappings and the the region, reducing opportunities returnees. More than 80% of them increased use of explosive for both host and displaced live in spontaneous settlements. devices. populations. (*Government figures) KEY INDICATORS FUNDING (AS OF 2 MARCH 2020) 226,383 USD 110.5 M Number of people of concern registered biometrically in requested for the UNHCR Niger Operation UNHCR database. Funded 17% 18.3 M 5,917 Households of 27,811 individuals were registered in Sayam Forage Camp as of 28 February 2021. 2,710 Houses built in Diffa region as of 28 February 2021. Unfunded 83% 92.2 M the UNHCR Niger Operation POPULATION OF CONCERN IN DIFFA (GOVERNMENT FIGURES) Asylum seekers 2 103 Returnees 1% 34 324 13% Refugees 126 543 47% 265 696 Displaced persons Internally Displaced persons 102 726 39% Construction of durable houses in Diffa © Ramatou Issa www.unhcr.org 1 OPERATIONAL UPDATE > Niger - Diffa / March 2021 Operation Strategy The key pillars of the UNHCR strategy for the Diffa region are: ■ Ensure institutional resilience through capacity development and support to the authorities (locally elected and administrative authorities) in the framework of the Niger decentralisation process. ■ Strengthen the out of camp policy around the urbanisation program through sustainable interventions and dynamic partnerships including with the World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
    Niger Page 1 of 3 Niger International Religious Freedom Report 2008 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides for freedom of religion, and other laws and policies contributed to the generally free practice of religion. The Government generally respected religious freedom in practice. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the Government during the period covered by this report. However, in a few instances local authorities interrupted celebrations of Eid al-Fitr that were on different days than the Government's officially declared end of fasting. There were no reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice, and prominent societal leaders took positive steps to promote religious freedom. The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom with the Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 490,000 square miles and a population of 14.8 million. Islam is practiced by more than 90 percent of the population. Approximately 95 percent of Muslims are Sunni and 5 percent Shi'a. There are also small communities of Christians and Baha'is. Christians, both Roman Catholics and Protestants, account for less than 5 percent of the population and are present mainly in the regions of Maradi and Dogondoutchi, and in Niamey and other urban centers with expatriate populations. Adherents of Christianity include local believers from the educated, the elite, and colonial families, as well as immigrants from neighboring coastal countries, particularly Benin, Togo, and Ghana.
    [Show full text]
  • NIGER: Carte Administrative NIGER - Carte Administrative
    NIGER - Carte Administrative NIGER: Carte administrative Awbari (Ubari) Madrusah Légende DJANET Tajarhi /" Capital Illizi Murzuq L I B Y E !. Chef lieu de région ! Chef lieu de département Frontières Route Principale Adrar Route secondaire A L G É R I E Fleuve Niger Tamanghasset Lit du lac Tchad Régions Agadez Timbuktu Borkou-Ennedi-Tibesti Diffa BARDAI-ZOUGRA(MIL) Dosso Maradi Niamey ZOUAR TESSALIT Tahoua Assamaka Tillabery Zinder IN GUEZZAM Kidal IFEROUANE DIRKOU ARLIT ! BILMA ! Timbuktu KIDAL GOUGARAM FACHI DANNAT TIMIA M A L I 0 100 200 300 kms TABELOT TCHIROZERINE N I G E R ! Map Doc Name: AGADEZ OCHA_SitMap_Niger !. GLIDE Number: 16032013 TASSARA INGALL Creation Date: 31 Août 2013 Projection/Datum: GCS/WGS 84 Gao Web Resources: www.unocha..org/niger GAO Nominal Scale at A3 paper size: 1: 5 000 000 TILLIA TCHINTABARADEN MENAKA ! Map data source(s): Timbuktu TAMAYA RENACOM, ARC, OCHA Niger ADARBISNAT ABALAK Disclaimers: KAOU ! TENIHIYA The designations employed and the presentation of material AKOUBOUNOU N'GOURTI I T C H A D on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion BERMO INATES TAKANAMATAFFALABARMOU TASKER whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations BANIBANGOU AZEY GADABEDJI TANOUT concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area ABALA MAIDAGI TAHOUA Mopti ! or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its YATAKALA SANAM TEBARAM !. Kanem WANZERBE AYOROU BAMBAYE KEITA MANGAIZE KALFO!U AZAGORGOULA TAMBAO DOLBEL BAGAROUA TABOTAKI TARKA BANKILARE DESSA DAKORO TAGRISS OLLELEWA
    [Show full text]
  • Resident / Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the Use of Cerf Funds Niger Rapid Response Conflict-Related Displacement
    RESIDENT / HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS NIGER RAPID RESPONSE CONFLICT-RELATED DISPLACEMENT RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR Mr. Fodé Ndiaye REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY a. Please indicate when the After Action Review (AAR) was conducted and who participated. Since the implementation of the response started, OCHA has regularly asked partners to update a matrix related to the state of implementation of activities, as well as geographical location of activities. On February 26, CERF-focal points from all agencies concerned met to kick off the reporting process and establish a framework. This was followed up by submission of individual projects and input in the following weeks, as well as consolidation and consultation in terms of the draft for the report. b. Please confirm that the Resident Coordinator and/or Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) Report was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team and by cluster/sector coordinators as outlined in the guidelines. YES NO c. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders as recommended in the guidelines (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies and their implementing partners, cluster/sector coordinators and members and relevant government counterparts)? YES NO The CERF Report has been shared with Cluster Coordinator and recipient agencies. 2 I. HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT TABLE 1: EMERGENCY ALLOCATION OVERVIEW (US$) Total amount required for the humanitarian response: 53,047,888 Source Amount CERF 5,181,281 Breakdown
    [Show full text]
  • Arrêt N° 01/10/CCT/ME Du 23 Novembre 2010
    REPUBLIQUE DU NIGER Fraternité – Travail – Progrès CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL DE TRANSITION Arrêt n° 01/10/CCT/ME du 23 novembre 2010 Le Conseil Constitutionnel de Transition statuant en matière électorale en son audience publique du vingt trois novembre deux mil dix tenue au Palais dudit Conseil, a rendu l’arrêt dont la teneur suit : LE CONSEIL Vu la proclamation du 18 février 2010 ; Vu l’ordonnance 2010-01 du 22 février 2010 modifiée portant organisation des pouvoirs publics pendant la période de transition ; Vu l’ordonnance n° 2010-031 du 27 mai 2010 portant code électoral et ses textes modificatifs subséquents ; Vu l’ordonnance n° 2010-038 du 12 juin 2010 portant composition, attributions, fonctionnement et procédure à suivre devant le Conseil Constitutionnel de Transition ; Vu le décret n° 2010-668/PCSRD du 1er octobre 2010 portant convocation du corps électoral pour le référendum sur la Constitution de la VIIème République ; Vu la requête en date du 8 novembre 2010 du Président de la Commission Electorale Nationale Indépendante (CENI) et les pièces jointes ; Vu l’ordonnance n° 003/PCCT du 8 novembre 2010 de Madame le Président du Conseil Constitutionnel portant désignation d’un Conseiller-Rapporteur ; Ensemble les pièces jointes ; Après audition du Conseiller – rapporteur et en avoir délibéré conformément à la loi ; EN LA FORME Considérant que par lettre n° 190/P/CENI en date du 8 novembre 2010, le Président de la Commission Electorale Nationale Indépendante (CENI) a saisi le Conseil Constitutionnel de Transition aux fins de valider
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR12228 Implementation Status & Results Niger Transport Sector Program Support Project (P101434) Operation Name: Transport Sector Program Support Project (P101434) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 11 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 26-Nov-2013 Country: Niger Approval FY: 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Sector Investment and Maintenance Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Board Approval Date 29-Apr-2008 Original Closing Date 15-Dec-2012 Planned Mid Term Review Date 14-Feb-2011 Last Archived ISR Date 24-Apr-2013 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 10-Sep-2008 Revised Closing Date 15-Dec-2015 Actual Mid Term Review Date 28-Jan-2011 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The project development objectives are to (i) improve the physical access of rural population to markets and services on selected unpaved sections of the national road network, and (ii) strengthen the institutional framework, management and implementation of roadmaintenance in Niger. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost 1. Periodic maintenance and spot rehabilitation of unpaved roads; 24.89 2. Institutional support to main transport sector players 2. Institutional support to the main transport sector players 5.11 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Moderate Moderate Public Disclosure Authorized Implementation Status Overview As of October 31, 2013, the Grant amount for the original project has reached a disbursement rate of about 100 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Smallholders Within the PAA Africa Programme in Niger
    WORKING PAPER working paper number 159 july, 2017 ISSN 1812-108x Fostering food purchase programmes in widespread poverty contexts: targeting smallholders within the PAA Africa Programme in Niger Rosana Pereira de Miranda, Amadou Diop and Israel Klug, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Empowered lives. Resilient nations. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) Working Paper No. 159 Fostering food purchase programmes in widespread poverty contexts: targeting smallholders within the PAA Africa Programme in Niger Rosana Pereira de Miranda, Amadou Diop and Israel Klug Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the United Nations Development Programme. © FAO and UNDP, 2017 All rights reserved. The International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth is jointly supported by the United Nations Development Programme and the Government of Brazil. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) SBS, Quadra 1, Bloco J, Ed. BNDES, 13º andar 70076-900 Brasília, DF - Brazil Telephone: +55 61 2105 5000 [email protected] ■ www.ipcig.org The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO, or UNDP in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    NIGER: COVID-19 Situation Report – #09 22 June to 20 July 2020 Situation in Numbers 1,105 COVID-19 confirmed cases 69 deaths 6,25% Lethality rate @UNICEFNiger/J.Haro (Ministère de la Santé Publique, July 20th, Situation Overview and Humanitarian Needs 2020) As of the end of the reporting period, Niger registered 1,105 cases of COVID-19, 1,014 3,800,000 patients healed, 69 deaths, 9,197 followed contacts, with a decreasing trend in cases. Children affected Even if the rate of imported cases is high, local transmission is still active. 4 out of 8 by COVID-19 regions didn’t report any cases for at least 2 weeks. UNICEF works closely with the Government and its partners to respond to the ongoing outbreak in the country, which is school reopening already facing the consequences of multiple crisis (nutrition, conflicts, natural disasters). As part of the national COVID-19 response plan, UNICEF is providing technical support to the government of Niger to scale-up the national safety net program to mitigate the social and economic impacts of the COVID-19 crisis on the most vulnerable population, US$ 25.8 M with a special focus on children and women needs. UNICEF continues to support the back funding required to school activities by providing the Ministry of Education with Education and WASH supplies, technical assistance, key messages about COVID-19 prevention and a monitoring system based on RapidPro. UNICEF assists particularly the Ministry of Health (MoH), in the field of risk communication/community engagement (RCCE), infection prevention and control (IPC), supply and logistics, epidemiological surveillance and healthcare provision and it is co-leading 3 of the 8 sub-committees established by the MoH (RCCE, IPC and logistics) at central and sub-national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Croix-Rouge Nigerienne Siege
    | Humanité | Impartialité | Neutralité | Indépendance | Volontariat | Unité | Universalité | |655 Rue NB 045 |Quartier Niamey Bas (Terminus) |Commune Niamey II ||Tél. (+227) 20 73 30 37 | |Fax: (+227) 20 73 24 61 |BP: 11 386 Niamey – Niger ||E-mail: [email protected]| Secrétariat Exécutif RAPPORT D’ACTIVITES 2015 CROIX-ROUGE NIGERIENNE SIEGE Décembre 2015 1 SOMMAIRE Introduction I. Les activités programmées et réalisées par les Départements techniques/CRN 1.1. Département santé 1.1.1. Les activités réalisées pour l’année 2015 1.1.1.1. Santé et Nutrition dans la commune rurale de Kiéché, département de Dogondoutchi 1.1.1.2 Ripostes méningite 2015 1.1.1.3 Projet EBOLA 1.1.1.4. Renforcement des capacités 1.1.2. Les difficultés rencontrées 1.1.3. Les perspectives 1.1 .4. Les recommandations 1.2. Département sécurité alimentaire 1.2.1 Activités programmées et réalisées 1.2.1.1 Programme de résilience Financé par le Gouvernement du Japon 1.2.1.2 Projet de renforcement de la résilience communautaire de Kiéché financé par le Consortium Croix-Rouge de Belgique et Irlandaise 1.2.1.3. Renforcement des capacités de la CRN 1.2.2. Difficultés rencontrées 1.2.3. Les perspectives pour l’année 2016 1.2.4. Recommandations 1.2.5. Conclusion 1.3. Département volontariat 1.3.1. Les activités réalisées 1.3.2. Activités non réalisées 1.3.3. Mobilisation des volontaires et nouvelles adhésions 1.3.4. Protection 1.3.5. Difficultés rencontrées dans l’application du cahier de charge 1.3.6. Recommandations 1.4. Département logistique 1.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Niger Food Security Brief
    NIGER FOOD SECURITY BRIEF MAY 2014 Niger Food Security Brief This publication was prepared by Meredith Sisa under the United States Agency for International Development Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Indefinite Quantity Contract, AID-OAA-I-12-00006. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Photo credit: Peter Thomas, FEWS NET Page 2 Niger Food Security Brief Introduction Over the last three decades, FEWS NET has steadily built a core set of integrated materials on livelihoods, household vulnerability, nutrition, trade, and agro- climatology through fieldwork and secondary data collection and research. FEWS NET also looks beyond the immediate context to understand the broader context and the underlying causes of food insecurity. This Food Security Brief draws on FEWS NET research and an array of other sources to provide an overview of the food security context and the main determinants of chronic and acute food insecurity, and highlight areas or livelihood zones at most risk of food insecurity. It is a starting ABOUT point for anyone seeking a deep understanding of the range of factors influencing food security in Niger. F E W S N E T The brief is organized around the FEWS NET Household Livelihoods Analytical Created in response to Framework (Figure 1), which looks at underlying and proximate causes of food the 1984 famines in insecurity as a means to inform outcomes at the regional and household levels. At East and West Africa, the core of this analysis is an understanding of hazards and their magnitude and the Famine Early extent, household vulnerability to hazards, and coping capacity in response.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Du Secteur Avicole
    DIVISION DE LA PRODUCTION ET DE LA SANTÉ ANIMALES DE LA FAO CENTRE D’URGENCE POUR LES MALADIES ANIMALES TRANSFRONTALIÈRES Revue du secteur avicole NIGER DIVISION DE LA PRODUCTION ET DE LA SANTÉ ANIMALES DE LA FAO CENTRE D’URGENCE POUR LES MALADIES ANIMALES TRANSFRONTALIÈRES Revue du secteur avicole NIGER Assoumane IDI, DMV, dipl. CSAAD, DEA, PhD Chef département production animale Institut national de la recherche agronomique du Niger (INRAN) BP 429 Niamey Niger Ousseini GANDA IDÉ Maîtrise ès sciences agronomiques Ingénieur zootechnicien BP 11 663 Niamey Niger ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L’ALIMENTATION ET L’AGRICULTURE 30 Avril 2009 Les appellations employées dans ce produit d'information et la présentation des données qui y figurent n'impliquent de la part de l'Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique ou au stade de développement des pays, territoires, villes ou zones ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. La mention ou l'omission de sociétés précises, de leurs produits ou de leurs marques, n'implique aucun appui ou jugement de la part de l'Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture. Les opinions exprimées dans la présente publication sont celles du/des auteur(s) et ne reflètent pas nécessairement celles de l'Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture. i Avant-propos Le risque d’apparition d’épizooties telles que l’Influenza Aviaire Hautement Pathogène à H5N1 (IAHP) nécessite une surveillance efficace et une capacité de réponse active et rapide à un niveau national, régional et international.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Satellite Derived Flood Assessment in Niamey, Maradi & Agadez Regions, Niger
    Preliminary satellite derived flood assessment in Niamey, Maradi & Agadez Regions, Niger Production Date: 09 Sep 2019 Areas of Interest (AOIs) AOI 3 NIGER Agadez Agadaz Tahoua Diffa Zinder Tillaberi Maradi Doso AOI 1 AOI 2 Niamey Maradi 2 AOI 1 : Niamey Region, Niger Sentinel-2 false color composite Pre-flood situation acquired on 17 AugIGERNIGER 2019 NIGER SUDAN Airport 3 km 3 Source: EO-browser sentinel-hub AOI 1 : Niamey Region, Niger Sentinel-2 false color composite acquired on 06 Sep 2019 NIGER NIGER SUDAN flooded areas close to urban zone Goroual Airport Inundated agricultural fields in the vicinity of urban areas Wet area in Agricultural zone Flooded areas close to urban zone and several agricultural fields along the river seem to be flooded 3 km 4 Source: EO-browser sentinel-hub AOI 2 : Maradi Region, Niger Sentinel-2 false color composite Sentinel-2 false color composite acquired on 31 Aug 2019 acquired on 05 Sep 2019 1 km 1 km Zone with receded waters north of Maradi The Airport The Airport NIGER Agricultural areas Receding waters in Maradi area between 31 Aug 2019 and 05 Sep 2019 5 Source: EO-browser sentinel-hub AOI 2 : Maradi Region, Niger Sentinel-1 Radar Image acquired on 05 Sep 2019 No fluvial overbank flow observed NIGER SUDAN 1 km 6 Source: EO-browser sentinel-hub AOI 3 : Agadez Region, Niger GeoEye-1 acquired on 04 Aug 2019 Worldview-3 acquired on 04 Sep 2019 3 km 3 km Agricultural Agricultural areas areas Agadez Agadez Airport Airport NIGER Situation assessment in Agadez as of 04 Sep 2019 7 Copyright ©: 2019 DigitalGlobe Source: US Department of State – HIU – NextView License AOI 3 : Agadez Region, Niger Worldview-3 acquired on 04 Sep 2019: Post-flood situation Waters have receded from several zones of Agadez (e.g.
    [Show full text]