DOCSLIB.ORG

Waterbirds in the International Rhine Valley in 1999/2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waterbirds in the International Rhine Valley in 1999/2000 Wasservögel im internationalen Rheintal: Zahlen, Verbreitung und Trends (EN) Bericht Nr. 277 Impressum Herausgeberin: Internationale Kommission zum Schutz des Rheins (IKSR) Kaiserin-Augusta-Anlagen 15, D 56068 Koblenz Postfach 20 02 53, D 56002 Koblenz Telefon +49-(0)261-94252-0, Fax +49-(0)261-94252-52 E-mail: [email protected] www.iksr.org © IKSR-CIPR-ICBR 2020 IKSR CIPR ICBR Authors: Marc van Roomen1, Fred Hustings1, Erik van Winden1, Christian Dronneau2, Christian Frauli2, Nicolas Strebel3, Johannes Wahl4, Kees Koffijberg1 & Chris van Turnhout1 With contributions from: Rüdiger Burkhardt5, Bernhard Disch6, Thomas Dolich7, Albrecht Frenzel8, Menno Hornman1, Veronika Huisman-Fiegen9, Harald Jacoby10, André van Kleunen1, Mona Kuhnigk9, Tom Langendoen11, Jochen Lehmann8, Nikolas Prior4, Jan Schoppers1 & Stefan R. Sudmann9 1 Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland 2 Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux d’Alsace, France 3 Schweizerische Vogelwarte Sempach 4 Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten 5 Hessische Gesellschaft für Ornithologie und Naturschutz 6 Fachschaft für Ornithologie Südlicher Oberrhein 7 Gesellschaft für Naturschutz und Ornithologie Rheinland-Pfalz 8 Ornithologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Karlsruhe 9 Nordrhein-Westfälische Ornithologengesellschaft 10 Ornithologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bodensee 11 Wetlands International Commissioned by: Rijkswaterstaat, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, The Netherlands A co-production of: Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland, Schweizerische Vogelwarte Sempach, Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux d’Alsace and Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten Photos: Harvey van Diek, Cor Fikkert, Hans Gebuis, Rein Hofman, Marcel van Kammen, Ralph Martin (Agami), Theo Verstrael, Gejo Wassink Lay-out & Production: Nikola Schulte-Kellinghaus International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) Recommended citation: van Roomen, M., Hustings, F., van Winden, E., Dronneau, C., Frauli, C., Strebel, N.,Wahl, J., Koffijberg, K. & van Turnhout, C. 2020. Waterbirds in the international Rhine Valley: numbers, distribution and trends. ICPR rap nr. 277, Sovon rap nr. 2020/99. International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine, Koblenz. 277en 2 IKSR CIPR ICBR Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ 5 Summary ............................................................................................................ 6 Zusammenfassung.............................................................................................. 8 Résumé .............................................................................................................10 Samenvatting ....................................................................................................13 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................16 2. Study area .....................................................................................................18 3. Methods .........................................................................................................21 3.1. Organisation ...............................................................................................21 3.2. Census areas ..............................................................................................22 3.3. Fieldwork ...................................................................................................23 3.4. Data analysis ..............................................................................................24 3.4.1. General aspects .....................................................................................24 3.4.2. Distribution ...........................................................................................24 3.4.3. Seasonal pattern ...................................................................................25 3.4.4. Trends January 1981-2018 .....................................................................25 4. Results ..........................................................................................................26 4.1. General results ...........................................................................................26 4.1.1. Status in 2015/16 – 2017/18 ..................................................................26 4.1.2. Trends January 1981-2018 .....................................................................31 4.2. Species accounts .........................................................................................38 4.2.1 Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis .............................................................39 4.2.2 Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus .....................................................41 4.2.3 Black-necked Grebe Podiceps nigricollis .....................................................43 4.2.4 Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis ...........................................45 4.2.5 Grey Heron Ardea cinerea ........................................................................48 4.2.7 Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus .................................................................52 4.2.8 Tundra Bean Goose Anser serrirostris ........................................................54 4.2.9 Greylag Goose Anser anser ......................................................................56 4.2.10 Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons ............................................59 4.2.11 Greater Canada Goose Branta canadensis canadensis ................................61 4.2.12 Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiacus....................................................63 4.2.13 Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea ........................................................65 4.2.14 Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope ..........................................................67 4.2.15 Gadwall Anas strepera ...........................................................................69 4.2.16 Eurasian Teal Anas crecca ......................................................................71 4.2.17 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos ....................................................................73 4.2.18 Northern Pintail Anas acuta ....................................................................75 4.2.19 Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata ............................................................77 277en 3 IKSR CIPR ICBR 4.2.20 Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina ............................................................79 4.2.21 Common Pochard Aythya ferina ..............................................................81 4.2.23 Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula ..................................................86 4.2.24 Smew Mergellus albellus ........................................................................88 4.2.25 Common Merganser Mergus merganser ...................................................90 4.2.27 Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus ..........................................94 4.2.28 Mew Gull Larus canus ............................................................................96 5. Discussion and conclusions ......................................................................... 100 5.1. Advances in data collection and analyses ..................................................... 100 5.2. Waterbird numbers and responses to ecological change ................................. 100 5.3. Conservation status of waterbirds in the Rhine Valley .................................... 101 5.4. Main conclusions ....................................................................................... 103 5.5. Recommendations for monitoring ................................................................ 104 6. References ................................................................................................... 106 Annex 1. Observers in the Rhine valley from winter 2015/16 onwards ........... 115 Annex 2. Species names .................................................................................. 118 Annex 3. Amount imputing per species and area ............................................. 120 Annex 4. Species attributes ............................................................................. 122 277en 4 IKSR CIPR ICBR Acknowledgements This study was made possible through financial support from Rijkswaterstaat, The Netherlands. Gerrit Vossebelt and Allard Hiddink are thanked for arranging this. From Rijkswaterstaat valuable guidance and comments on a first draft were received from Gerrit Vossebelt and Mervyn Roos. This report is based on census data covering a timespan of mearly 40 years! In recent years alone, about 700 dedicated birdwatchers have contributed (see annex 1). They are largely skilled volunteers, carrying out the field work in their spare time, supplemented with professionals from research institutes and nature management organizations. Coordination at the regional, national and international level is essential to run such a large-scale network for bird monitoring successfully. The waterbird census in Switzerland is coordinated by Vogelwarte Sempach by Nicolas Strebel and supported by the Federal Office of the Environment (Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU, Switzerland). The regional coordination for the Bodensee is done by Harald Jacoby, Ornithologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bodensee. The waterbird census in France is coordinated by Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux (LPO), Regional coordination at the French side of the “Oberrhein” (called
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Presentatie Bor Waal Merwede
    Bouwsteen Beeld op de Rivieren 24 november 2020 – Bouwdag Rijn 1 Ontwikkelperspectief Waal Merwede 24 november 2020 – Bouwdag Rijn 1 Ontwikkelperspectief Waal Merwede Trajecten Waal Merwede • Midden-Waal (Nijmegen - Tiel) • Beneden-Waal (Tiel - Woudrichem) • Boven-Merwede (Woudrichem – Werkendam) Wat bespreken we? • Oogst gezamenlijke werksessies • Richtinggevend perspectief gebruiksfuncties rivierengebied • Lange termijn (2050 en verder) • Strategische keuzen Hoe lees je de kaart? • Bekijk de kaart via de GIS viewer • Toekomstige gebruiksfuncties zijn met kleur aangegeven • Kansen en opgaven met * aangeduid, verbindingen met een pijl • Keuzes en dilemma’s weergegeven met icoontje Synthese Rijn Waterbeschikbaarheid • Belangrijkste strategische keuze: waterverdeling splitsingspunt. • Meer water via IJssel naar IJsselmeer in tijden van hoogwater (aanvullen buffer IJsselmeer) • Verplaatsen innamepunten Lek voor zoetwater wenselijk i.v.m. verzilting • Afbouwen drainage in buitendijkse gebieden i.v.m. langer vasthouden van water. Creëren van waterbuffers in bovenstroomse deel van het Nederlandse Rijnsysteem. (balans • droge/natte periodes). Natuur • Noodzakelijk om robuuste natuureenheden te realiseren • Splitsingspunt is belangrijke ecologische knooppunt. • Uiterwaarden Waal geschikt voor dynamische grootschalige natuur. Landbouw • Nederrijn + IJssel: mengvorm van landbouw en natuur mogelijk. Waterveiligheid • Tot 2050 zijn dijkversterkingen afdoende -> daarna meer richten op rivierverruiming. Meer water via IJssel betekent vergroten waterveiligheidsopgave
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetatiebeheer Grote Rivieren Versie
    Vegetatiebeheer Grote Rivieren Normatief kader Versie: 6 – 06 – 2012 Normatief kader voor vegetatiebeheer grote rivieren, versie 6-06-2012 blz 1 Normatief kader voor vegetatiebeheer grote rivieren, versie 6-06-2012 blz 2 Vegetatiebeheer Grote Rivieren Normatief kader INHOUD Voorwoord .....................................................................................................................4 1 Probleemstelling en opdracht.................................................................................6 2 Redeneerlijn ...........................................................................................................8 3 Stroombanen ........................................................................................................11 4 Afwegingskader ...................................................................................................16 5 Omvang inhaalslag...............................................................................................18 6. Doelbereik en robuustheid stroombanen .............................................................21 Bijlage 1 Ruwheidsklassen......................................................................................26 Bijlage 2 Bomen, heggen, lanen..............................................................................29 Bijlage 3 Begrenzing projectgebied ........................................................................30 Normatief kader voor vegetatiebeheer grote rivieren, versie 6-06-2012 blz 3 Voorwoord Voor u ligt de eindversie van het Normatief
    [Show full text]
  • Communal Commercial Check City of Aachen
    Eigentum von Fahrländer Partner AG, Zürich Communal commercial check City of Aachen Location Commune Aachen (Code: 5334002) Location Aachen (PLZ: 52062) (FPRE: DE-05-000334) Commune type City District Städteregion Aachen District type District Federal state North Rhine-Westphalia Topics 1 Labour market 9 Accessibility and infrastructure 2 Key figures: Economy 10 Perspectives 2030 3 Branch structure and structural change 4 Key branches 5 Branch division comparison 6 Population 7 Taxes, income and purchasing power 8 Market rents and price levels Fahrländer Partner AG Communal commercial check: City of Aachen 3rd quarter 2021 Raumentwicklung Eigentum von Fahrländer Partner AG, Zürich Summary Macro location text commerce City of Aachen Aachen (PLZ: 52062) lies in the City of Aachen in the District Städteregion Aachen in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia. Aachen has a population of 248'960 inhabitants (31.12.2019), living in 142'724 households. Thus, the average number of persons per household is 1.74. The yearly average net migration between 2014 and 2019 for Städteregion Aachen is 1'364 persons. In comparison to national numbers, average migration tendencies can be observed in Aachen within this time span. According to Fahrländer Partner (FPRE), in 2018 approximately 34.3% of the resident households on municipality level belong to the upper social class (Germany: 31.5%), 33.6% of the households belong to the middle class (Germany: 35.3%) and 32.0% to the lower social class (Germany: 33.2%). The yearly purchasing power per inhabitant in 2020 and on the communal level amounts to 22'591 EUR, at the federal state level North Rhine-Westphalia to 23'445 EUR and on national level to 23'766 EUR.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study North Rhine-Westphalia
    Contract No. 2008.CE.16.0.AT.020 concerning the ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes 2000‐2006 co‐financed by the European Regional Development Fund (Objectives 1 and 2) Work Package 4 “Structural Change and Globalisation” CASE STUDY NORTH RHINE‐WESTPHALIA (DE) Prepared by Christian Hartmann (Joanneum Research) for: European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy Policy Development Evaluation Unit CSIL, Centre for Industrial Studies, Milan, Italy Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria Technopolis Group, Brussels, Belgium In association with Nordregio, the Nordic Centre for Spatial Development, Stockholm, Sweden KITE, Centre for Knowledge, Innovation, Technology and Enterprise, Newcastle, UK Case Study – North Rhine‐Westphalia (DE) Acronyms BERD Business Expenditure on R&D DPMA German Patent and Trade Mark Office ERDF European Regional Development Fund ESF European Social Fund EU European Union GERD Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D GDP Gross Domestic Product GRP Gross Regional Product GVA Gross Value Added ICT Information and Communication Technology IWR Institute of the Renewable Energy Industry LDS State Office for Statistics and Data Processing NGO Non‐governmental Organisation NPO Non‐profit Organisation NRW North Rhine‐Westphalia NUTS Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics PPS Purchasing Power Standard REN Rational Energy Use and Exploitation of Renewable Resources R&D Research and Development RTDI Research, Technological Development and Innovation SME Small and Medium Enterprise SPD Single Programming Document
    [Show full text]
  • Castles Along the Rhine & Moselle, 5 Days
    CASTLES ALONG THE RHINE & MOSELLE Private Escorted Tour April 1 - October 20, 2021 - Departure any day 5 days / 4 nights: 1 night in Frankfurt, Liebenstein Castle, Ehrenburg Castle, Trier, Heidelberg Accommodation Meals Tours Transportation Transfer Not included 4* hotels in each city Breakfast daily in Tours throughout as Car or minival during entire tour. Arrival and City taxes in hotels each city. per itinerary. departure transfers to be paid on site English speaking guide during Admissions to entire tour. castles included Wine tasting Rates 2021 US$ per Person Day by Day Itinerary Day 1: The tour begins in Frankfurt and follows the Rhine to Rudesheim. Enjoy a sightseeing Hotel Class & Dates Twin Single tour of Rudesheim’s old historic center. Next we embark on a cruise and sail along the Rhine River, the Lorelei Valley. Disembark at Kamp-Bornhofen and ascend to Liebenstein 4* Hotel Castle, which towers high above the village and offers a beautiful view of the Rhine. April 1 - October 20 $3,569 $3,924 Accommodation in this 13th century castle. The rooms have been beautifully restored in medieval style. *Based on minimum 2 people traveling Day 2: After breakfast, travel to the ancient Roman city of Koblenz, one of the oldest cities in together. Germany. Then continue to the “Deutsches Eck” or German Corner, where the Moselle meets the Rhine. Cross the river in a panoramic cable car for a spectacular view. Visit the Liebenstein ← Frankfurt Ehrenbreitstein Fort, the second largest fort in Europe. Then continue along the Moselle ← river and the Ehrbachtal Valley. Ascend to Ehrenburg Castle for the Night.
    [Show full text]
  • From a Defensive to an Integrated Approach Victor N
    01chap.qxd 5/4/09 10:26 AM Page 17 Copyright 2009 by Resources for the Future, in Water Policy in the Netherlands: Integrated Management in a Densely Populated Delta, edited by Stijn Reinhard and Henk Folmer. No part of this book chapter may be reproduced, distributed, or stored in any form or by any means (including photocopying, email, online posting, or electronic archiving on a disk drive or server) without the written permission of the Publisher. CHAPTER 1 From a Defensive to an Integrated Approach Victor N. de Jonge RESENT WATER MANAGEMENT policy and practice in the Netherlands have P been heavily influenced by a combination of the geological history of the country and the activities carried out by its inhabitants since about 2500 BP (years before present).The history of Dutch water policies began when the inhabitants of the coastal and floodplain areas tried to safeguard themselves and their livestock by building and living atop dwelling mounds.This was followed by the defensive and offensive periods, during which dikes were built, peat was excavated, and land was reclaimed for safety, living space, and agriculture. Quantitative water policy began in the 1200s, when farmers started organizing to combat flooding. Since then, local, and later also regional, water boards were formed. In the late 1960s, qualitative water policy was added to the existing quantitative policy.Two decades later, in the late 1980s, the focus of qualitative and quantitative water policies broad- ened to include the protection of aquatic ecosystems and sustainable economic development. This chapter describes the geological history of the Netherlands, the impact of humans on its aquatic environments, and the history of water management in the country.It provides the foundation for more detailed discussions in the chapters to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansen Voor Achteroevers Inhoud
    Kansen voor Achteroevers Inhoud Een oever achter de dijk om water beter te benuten 3 Wenkend perspectief 4 Achteroever Koopmanspolder – Proefuin voor innovatief waterbeheer en natuurontwikkeling 5 Achteroever Wieringermeer – Combinatie waterbeheer met economische bedrijvigheid 7 Samenwerking 11 “Herstel de natuurlijke dynamiek in het IJsselmeergebied waar het kan” 12 Het achteroeverconcept en de toekomst van het IJsselmeergebied 14 Naar een living lab IJsselmeergebied? 15 Het IJsselmeergebied Achteroever Wieringermeer Achteroever Koopmanspolder Een oever achter de dijk om water beter te benuten Anders omgaan met ons schaarse zoete water Het klimaat verandert en dat heef grote gevolgen voor het waterbeheer in Nederland. We zullen moeten leren omgaan met grotere hoeveelheden water (zeespiegelstijging, grotere rivierafvoeren, extremere hoeveelheden neerslag), maar ook met grotere perioden van droogte. De zomer van 2018 staat wat dat betref nog vers in het geheugen. Beschikbaar zoet water is schaars op wereldschaal. Het meeste water op aarde is zout, en veel van het zoete water zit in gletsjers, of in de ondergrond. Slechts een klein deel is beschikbaar in meren en rivieren. Het IJsselmeer – inclusief Markermeer en Randmeren – is een grote regenton met kost- baar zoet water van prima kwaliteit voor een groot deel van Nederland. Het watersysteem functioneert nog goed, maar loopt wel op tegen de grenzen vanwege klimaatverandering. Door innovatie wegen naar de toekomst verkennen Het is verstandig om ons op die verandering voor te bereiden. Rijkswaterstaat verkent daarom samen met partners nu al mogelijke oplossingsrichtingen die ons in de toekomst kunnen helpen. Dat doen we door te innoveren en te zoeken naar vernieuwende manieren om met het water om te gaan.
    [Show full text]
  • International Cooperation on the River Rhine
    International cooperation on the river Rhine Maarten Hofstra Unesco‐IHE/Water Governance Centre NL The Rhine river basin The Rhine = 3rd biggest European river 200.000 km² Outline •The Rhine: some chracteristics •The Netherlands as a downstream country •Early cooperation in the Rhine basin •Water pollution •Difficulties and conflicts •Flood protection •Ecological restauration •What makes cooperation work Cooperation in the Rhine basin Dutch border with: ‐Switzerland ‐Germany ‐France ‐Luxembourg ‐Netherlands The Rhine river basin Inhabitants Coblence – CIPR 58 Mio. Drinking water for 20 million people Main stream 1233 km Navigable 825 km from Basel/ Rheinfelden – Rotterdam RIZA RIZA Some hydrological characteristics of the Rhine Mean discharge Lobith: 2.200 m3/s Minimum in January Lowest discharge: 620 m3/s (1947, November) Extreme flood 1926, January: 12.600 m3/s Flood 1995, January: ca 12.000 m3/s Height difference Rotterdam‐Basel: 260 m The Netherlands as a downstream country International cooperation: Shipping on the River Rhine 1815: Congres of Vienna ‐ Free shipping ‐ Central committee for the River Rhine 1831 Act of Mainz 1868 Act of Mannheim 1963 Convention of Strassbourg International cooperation on prevention of pollution After World War 2: Pollution of the river leading to poor water quality International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) Switzerland, France, Germany, Luxemburg, Netherlands, European Community Established 1950 Confirmed 1963 Rhine action programme 1987 New Rhine Treaty 1‐1‐2003: Rhine 2020 ICPR:
    [Show full text]
  • Grand-Plan-2019.Pdf
    Eckwersheim La Wantzenau Le Golf Eckwersheim 71 flex’hop 72 72 Cimetière Eckwersheim Hippodrome La Wantzenau RD 223 Eckwersheim ZA Mairie Canal Vendenheim La RD 226 Gutenberg Wantzenau Gare Château d'Eau train 71 train La Wantzenau Eglise Vendenheim La Wantzenau Le Tilleul Hohl Au Tilleul Pont Vendenheim Temple SNCF Gare La Wantzenau Ecole www.cts-strasbourg.eu L6 La Wantzenau Mairie 75 La Wantzenau Patronage Vendenheim Perdrix Général Leclerc Mairie 74 Vendenheim Faubourg d'Alençon Légende Artisans Saint-Yrieix Zone Commerciale Nord Legende/Key Reichstett Vergers RD 64 Rochechouart Terminus de ligne Lampertheim 74 76 Endhaltestelle der Linie 75 Terminus 74 Arrêt desservi dans les deux sens Lorraine TER Hay Ecomusée Haltestelle in beide Richtungen Lampertheim Lampertheim Eglise TER Stop with services in both directions Lampertheim Alisiers Rue des Arrêt desservi Mairie Reichstett Hirondelles au dans un seul sens 73 en Champs Haltestelle in einer Richtung tz an Stop with service in one direction W Rue de Alouettes Circuit parcouru train L6 Honau Mundolsheim à certaines heures Mehrstündiger Parcours Electricité a 72 L Stretch operated at certain times only 73 Collège Anémones 60 TER e d Mundolsheim 74 RD 863 76 Petite R Connexion bus-tram-train Mundolsheim Découvertes o u Verbindung Bus Straßenbahn Zug Mairie t Saules Bus tram train connexion e te Souffelweyersheim R Souffelweyersheim Parking Relais Tram Bouvreuils Canal Mundolsheim Berlioz Centre P+R Tram / Tram P&R car park Dauphiné tre de d Unterjaegerhof Lat Ta e e s D s l ig Ballastière
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithologische Forschung Im 20. Jahrhundert in Der Schweiz – Ein Erfolgreiches Miteinander Von Fachleuten Und Laienornithologen
    Der Ornithologische Beobachter / Band 106 / Heft 1 / März 2009 3 Ornithologische Forschung im 20. Jahrhundert in der Schweiz – ein erfolgreiches Miteinander von Fachleuten und Laienornithologen Urs N. Glutz von Blotzheim GLUTZ VON BLOTZHEIM, U. N. (2009): Ornithological research in Switzerland in the course of the 20th century – a fruitful collaboration of professionals and amateurs. Ornithol. Beob. 106: 3–48. This contribution is not to be seen as the still missing history of Swiss Orni- thology. (1) Basically there is no space for it here. (2) The Ala was founded as a countrywide society. However, after the foundation of «Nos Oiseaux» in 1913, it became more and more restricted to the German-speaking part of Switzer- land. Therefore this contribution focuses on this part of Switzerland, although the French- or Italian-speaking ornithologists have greatly contributed to the advancement of ornithology in Switzerland. The characteristic fields of Swiss ornithologists are faunistics, migration, conservation biology, morphology and moult. Switzerland belongs to the lead- ing countries with regard to knowledge on the status of birds, their occurrence, their numbers, their breeding biology and migration. The tradition of counting waterbirds is nearly 60 years old. The results have been the basis for a number of important papers on the ecology of waterbirds. The passage of migrants has been studied intensively on several mountain passes. The Col de Cou and Col de Bretolet belong to the most important sites for studying bird migration in Europe. Another long lasting and impressive tradition is the radar ornithol- ogy which began about 1955. It evolved as one of the most successful fields of Swiss ornithology with astonishing contributions not only in or near the Alps but also on the Mediterranean coasts, in the Middle East and in the Mauritanian Sahara.
    [Show full text]
  • (M Supplément) Administration Générale Et Économie 1800-1870
    Archives départementales du Bas-Rhin Répertoire numérique de la sous-série 15 M (M supplément) Administration générale et économie 1800-1870 Dressé en 1980 par Louis Martin Documentaliste aux Archives du Bas-Rhin Remis en forme en 2016 par Dominique Fassel sous la direction d’Adélaïde Zeyer, conservateur du patrimoine Mise à jour du 19 décembre 2019 Sous-série 15 M – Administration générale et économie, 1800-1870 (M complément) Page 2 sur 204 Sous-série 15 M – Administration générale et économie, 1800-1870 (M complément) XV. ADMINISTRATION GENERALE ET ECONOMIE COMPLEMENT Sommaire Introduction Répertoire de la sous-série 15 M Personnel administratif ........................................................................... 15 M 1-7 Elections ................................................................................................... 15 M 8-21 Police générale et administrative............................................................ 15 M 22-212 Distinctions honorifiques ........................................................................ 15 M 213 Hygiène et santé publique ....................................................................... 15 M 214-300 Divisions administratives et territoriales ............................................... 15 M 301-372 Population ................................................................................................ 15 M 373 Etat civil ................................................................................................... 15 M 374-377 Subsistances ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regioadvies Voorkeursstrategie Neder-Rijn En Lek
    Regioadvies Voorkeursstrategie Neder-Rijn en Lek Maart 2014 Regioadvies Voorkeursstrategie Neder-Rijn en Lek 12 Maart 2014 Vastgesteld Bestuurlijk Overleg regioproces Neder-Rijn Lek Contactpersonen: Marjolein Braam Jan Willem Vrolijk Wilma Timmers Inhoudsopgave Samenva ng 1 1. Inleiding 4 2. Karakteris ek Neder-Rijn en Lek 5 2.1 Karakeris ek rivier Neder-Rijn en Lek 5 2.2 Karakeris ek overstromingen vanuit de Neder-Rijn en Lek 6 3. De waterveiligheidsopgave voor de Neder-Rijn en Lek 7 3.1 Huidige werkzaamheden HWBP2 en Ruimte voor de Rivier 8 3.2 Op orde brengen: nHWBP en nieuwe inzichten 8 3.3 Het actualiseren van het beschermingsniveau 9 3.4 Op orde houden van het systeem: Klimaatopgave en bodemdaling 9 4. Ruimtelijke visie Neder-Rijn en Lek 10 4.1 Hoofdlijnen ruimtelijke visie 10 4.2 Ruimtelijke visie als basis voor de voorkeursstrategie 10 4.3 Dijkenstrategie 10 5. Principes en uitgangspunten 11 5.1 Algemene principes 11 5.2 Uitgangspunten 12 6. Voorkeursstrategie Neder-Rijn en Lek 13 6.1 Aanpak en benadering 13 6.2 Hoofdlijn voorkeursstrategie 13 6.3 Voorkeursstrategie nader toegelicht 14 6.3.1 Dijkenstrategie 14 6.3.2 Nieuwe Ruimte voor de Rivier maatregelen 14 6.3.3 Systeemingrepen 14 6.3.4 Meerlaagsveiligheid 15 6.3.5 Buitendijkse ontwikkelingen 15 6.4 Waterveiligheidsmaatregelpakket voorkeursstrategie 16 6.5 fasering in maatregelenpakket 22 6.5.1 Waterveiligheidsmaatregelen tot 2030 22 6.5.2 Waterveiligheidsmaatregelen tussen 2031 - 2050 22 6.5.3 Waterveiligheidsmaatregelen tussen 2051 - 2100 22 6.6 Kosten en bereik 22 6.6.1 Kosten Voorkeursstrategie 22 6.6.2 Onderbouwing hoofdkeuze Centraal Holland 23 6.6.3 Kosteneff ec viteit lokale rivierverruiming 23 6.7 Meekoppelkansen 23 7.
    [Show full text]