DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulgaria | Freedom House

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulgaria | Freedom House Bulgaria | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/bulgaria A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 11 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The president, who is directly elected for up to two five-year terms, is the head of state but has limited powers. In 2016, former air force commander Rumen Radev—an independent supported by the opposition Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP)—defeated parliament speaker Tsetska Tsacheva of the ruling Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (GERB) party, taking more than 59 percent of the vote. The election was generally well administered, and stakeholders accepted the results. The legislature chooses the prime minister, who serves as head of government. Prime Minister Boyko Borisov of the center-right GERB was returned to office after his party’s victory in the 2017 parliamentary elections. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The unicameral National Assembly, composed of 240 members, is elected every four years in 31 multimember constituencies. The 2017 elections were deemed free and fair by international observers. GERB led with 95 seats, followed by the BSP with 80, the nationalist United Patriots alliance with 27, the Movement for Rights and Freedoms (DPS) with 26, and the right-wing populist Volya with 12. Following the elections, a coalition government consisting of GERB and the United Patriots took office. A3. Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 3 / 4 The Central Election Commission administers Bulgarian elections and generally works professionally and impartially, though some flaws have been reported in past elections. The parliament passed controversial reforms to the electoral laws in 2016, including the introduction of compulsory voting and new rules on voting abroad that limited the number of polling places and led to protests throughout the diaspora. In 2017, the Constitutional Court struck down the law on compulsory voting. Further proposed changes to the electoral system in a 2016 referendum, such as the introduction of a majoritarian system for parliamentary elections, were supported by a majority of voters but failed to reach the turnout threshold for the votes to be binding. 1 of 6 7/26/2019, 2:20 PM Bulgaria | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/bulgaria B. POLITICAL PLURALISM AND PARTICIPATION: 14 / 16 B1. Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? 4 / 4 The Bulgarian party system is competitive and dynamic, featuring long-term players like the BSP and DPS as well as cycles in which new parties emerge while others decline or disappear. GERB first won seats in the parliament only in 2009, and the 2017 elections featured the emergence of the United Patriots alliance with 27 seats. B2. Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? 4 / 4 There have been multiple peaceful transfers of power between rival parties through elections since the end of communist rule in 1990. In the 2017 parliamentary elections, the BSP, currently the main opposition party, gained 41 seats compared with the previous balloting. B3. Are the people’s political choices free from domination by the military, foreign powers, religious hierarchies, economic oligarchies, or any other powerful group that is not democratically accountable? 3 / 4 Bulgarians are generally free to make independent political choices. However, economic oligarchs dominate the major political parties and influence their platforms, a problem that is exacerbated by a lack of transparency in campaign finance law. B4. Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, religious, gender, LGBT, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? 3 / 4 While women and minorities generally have full political rights, the law dictates that electoral campaigns must be conducted in the Bulgarian language, which hinders outreach to non-Bulgarian-speaking minority groups. The ethnic Turkish minority is represented by the DPS, but the Romany minority is more marginalized. Small Romany parties are active, and many Roma reportedly vote for the DPS, though none hold seats in the parliament. Members of far-right nationalist parties, including the United Patriots, engage in hate speech against ethnic Turks, Roma, Jews, Muslims, migrants, and refugees, among other groups, particularly during election periods, raising concerns about the normalization of xenophobia and discrimination. C. FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT: 8 / 12 C1. Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? 4 / 4 Elected executive and legislative officials are generally able to set and implement policies without undue interference from external or unelected entities. However, oligarch politicians dominate the government and greatly influence policymaking. 2 of 6 7/26/2019, 2:20 PM Bulgaria | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/bulgaria C2. Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? 2 / 4 Bulgaria, which joined the European Union (EU) in 2007, has struggled to meet the bloc’s anticorruption requirements amid resistance from much of the political class. Anticorruption laws are not adequately enforced, including in high-profile cases, contributing to a culture of impunity. The country remains subject to long-term monitoring by the EU’s cooperation and verification mechanism (CVM), whose annual reports have called for new legislative efforts to combat corruption. In January 2018, the parliament overrode a presidential veto and adopted legislation that would create a centralized anticorruption commission to replace multiple existing bodies. The new commission would assess officials’ asset declarations and flag conflicts of interest, and it would have the authority to initiate the seizure of illegally obtained assets. Some analysts remained concerned about the effectiveness and possible politicization of the new agency. C3. Does the government operate with openness and transparency? 2 / 4 Although Bulgaria has laws meant to ensure that the government operates with transparency, they are not well enforced. Public access to information about the budgets and spending of various government agencies is often lacking in practice. D. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND BELIEF: 14 / 16 D1. Are there free and independent media? 3 / 4 The constitution protects freedom of expression, including for the press, but journalists face threats and occasional violence. In May 2018, investigative journalist Hristo Geshov was assaulted outside his home by an unidentified attacker. Two other reporters were arrested and briefly detained while investigating alleged fraud involving EU funds in September. In October, Viktoria Marinova, a television journalist who had recently interviewed the two fraud investigators, was raped and killed in the town of Ruse. However, a suspect was quickly arrested with the help of German authorities, and despite ongoing doubts, there was apparently no evidence linking the crime to Marinova’s work. The media sector is pluralistic, but many outlets are dependent on financial contributions from the state, often in the form of advertising, which can lead to demands for favorable coverage of the government. Domestic ownership of media has become more concentrated in the hands of wealthy Bulgarian businessmen, leaving the sector vulnerable to political and economic pressures and limiting the diversity of perspectives available to the public. News outlets often tailor coverage to suit the interests of their owners. In July 2018, newspapers in a conglomerate owned by lawmaker Delyan Peevski called on a television station to dismiss a presenter who had inquired about Peevski’s businesses on air. 3 of 6 7/26/2019, 2:20 PM Bulgaria | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/bulgaria D2. Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? 3 / 4 Religious freedom is generally respected, but members of minority faiths in the mostly Orthodox Christian country have reported instances of harassment and discrimination, and some local authorities have prohibited proselytizing and other religious activities by such groups. A 2016 law that imposed fines for the wearing of face-covering garments in public locations was widely understood to be directed against Muslims. D3. Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? 4 / 4 Academic freedom is generally upheld in practice. D4. Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? 4 / 4 Freedom of expression is guaranteed by the constitution, and there are no significant impediments to free and open private discussion. E. ASSOCIATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL RIGHTS: 11 / 12 E1. Is there freedom of assembly? 4 / 4 The authorities generally respect constitutional guarantees of freedom of assembly. A number of mass demonstrations proceeded without incident during 2018, with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Country Position Name Email Albania President Mr. Ilir Meta [email protected] Prime Minister Mr
    Country Position Name Email Albania President Mr. Ilir Meta [email protected] Prime Minister Mr. Edi Rama [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Ditmir Bushati [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Ms. Besiana Kadare [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Ms. Ravesa Lleshi [email protected] Belarus President Mr. Alexander Lukashenko [email protected] Prime Minister Mr. Siarhiej Rumas [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Vladimir Makei [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Valentin Rybakov [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Mr. Yury Ambrazevich [email protected] Bosnia and HerzegovinaCo-President Mr. Šefik Džaferović [email protected] Co-President Mr. Milorad Dodik [email protected] Co-President Mr. Željko Komšić [email protected] Prime Minister Mr. Zoran Tegeltija [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Igor Crnadak [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Sven Alkalaj [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Ms. Nermina Kapetanovic [email protected] Bulgaria President Mr. Rumen Radev [email protected] Prime Minister Ms. Boyko Borissov [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mrs. Ekaterina Spasova Gecheva-Zakharieva [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Georgi Velikov Panayotov [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Ms. Deyana Kostadinova [email protected] Croatia President Mr. Zoran Milanović [email protected] Prime Minister Andrej Plenković [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Political Briefing: Bulgarian President Rumen Radev Will Run for a Second Term Evgeniy Kandilarov
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 37, No. 1 (BG) February 2021 Bulgaria political briefing: Bulgarian President Rumen Radev will run for a Second Term Evgeniy Kandilarov 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Bulgarian President Rumen Radev will run for a Second Term One of the most significant political events in the last few weeks in Bulgaria was the announcement of the President Roumen Radev, on Februaty 1st, that he and the Vice President Iliana Yotova will run for a second term in office at the presidential elections scheduled for this fall. This became clear during a press conference at which the head of state reported on what had been done over the past four years. “Our candidacy at this time is an honest move for citizens and political figures,” he said in an hour-long speech, hailing his own presidency as a voice of reason during the last few years. President Rumen Radev took the office after winning a second round of voting in 2016 – against GERB candidate Tsetska Tsacheva. Radev and Iliana Yotova took the oath as president and vice president in the parliament on January 19, 2017.Three days later, on January 22, they officially took the office. Under the constitution, the presidential couple's term expires in January 2022. Elections for a new head of state will be in the fall but it is not yet clear whether they will be in October or November.
    [Show full text]
  • A Game of Polls: Bulgaria's Presidential Election Threatens To
    A game of polls: Bulgaria’s presidential election threatens to shake up the country’s party system blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2016/10/31/game-of-polls-bulgaria-presidential-election/ 31/10/2016 Bulgaria will hold presidential elections on 6 November, with a second round runoff scheduled for 13 November. Dimitar Bechev previews the contest, writing that the candidate supported by the country’s largest party, GERB, could face a tougher contest than originally anticipated. Presidential elections in Bulgaria are supposed to be a rather dull affair. Many expected the candidate handpicked by Prime Minister Boyko Borisov to make it comfortably to the second round (to be held on 13 November), piggybacking on their patron’s popularity as well as the ruling party GERB’s (Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria) formidable electoral machine. To Borisov’s chagrin, that now seems less and less likely. Polls suggest that the race between his choice, parliament speaker Tsetska Tsacheva, and General Rumen Radev, backed by the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP), will be tight. Not quite the suspense of the U.S. presidential contest, but certainly not lacking in drama either. And, to boot, the opposition frontrunner might actually have a fair chance. He could well rally the votes cast for United Patriots, an ultra-nationalist coalition between erstwhile sworn enemies the Patriotic Front and Ataka, for ABV (Alternative for Bulgarian Renaissance), a splinter group from the BSP, and several other minor players. Borisov has only himself to blame for this state of affairs. He delayed his choice as much as possible, unveiling Tsacheva at the very last moment – well after other contenders had stepped into the fray.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria: Freedom in the World 2017 Country Report
    FREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2017 Bulgaria 80 FREE /100 Political Rights 33 /40 Civil Liberties 47 /60 Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology. Overview Multiple parties compete in Bulgaria’s democratic electoral system, and there have been several transfers of power between rival parties in recent decades. The country continues to struggle with political corruption and organized crime, and the political discourse is marred by hate speech against minority groups and foreigners, especially from smaller right-wing parties. While the media sector remains pluralistic, ownership concentration is a growing problem, and news outlets often tailor coverage to suit the interests of their owners. Journalists sometimes encounter threats or violence in the course of their work. Ethnic minorities, particularly Roma, face discrimination. Despite funding shortages and other obstacles, civil society groups have been active and influential. Key Developments in 2016 • Rumen Radev, a candidate endorsed by the center-left opposition, defeated a government-backed rival in the November presidential election. Incumbent Rosen Plevneliev had decided not to seek reelection. • Following the election, the right-leaning prime minister resigned, meaning snap parliamentary elections would likely be held in early 2017. • In September, amid growing nationalist hostility toward Muslim migrants, the parliament passed a nationwide ban on face-covering clothing in public places. Executive Summary A coalition government led by Prime Minister Boyko Borisov and his center-right party, Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (GERB), held power for most of 2016. However, it began to weaken in May, when the left-leaning Alternative for Bulgarian Revival (ABV) party withdrew its support.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World Report 2020
    Bulgaria | Freedom House Page 1 of 17 BulgariaFREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2020 80 FREE /100 Political Rights 34 Civil Liberties 46 80 Free Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology. TOP Overview https://freedomhouse.org/country/bulgaria/freedom-world/2020 7/24/2020 Bulgaria | Freedom House Page 2 of 17 Bulgaria’s democratic system holds competitive elections and has seen several transfers of power in recent decades. The country continues to struggle with political corruption and organized crime. The media sector is less pluralistic, as ownership concentration has considerably increased in the last 10 years. Journalists encounter threats and even violence in the course of their work and are sometimes fired for not following the editorial line. Ethnic minorities, particularly Roma, face discrimination. Despite funding shortages and other obstacles, civil society groups have been active and influential. Key Developments in 2019 • In December, the parliament reinstituted the state subsidies for political parties, which had controversially been cut in July. The July amendment to the Political Parties Act also lifted the ceiling on donations for political parties by private persons, businesses, and other organizations. • In September, the director general of the Bulgarian National Radio (BNR) removed a prominent journalist from a live-broadcast and suspended BNR programming for an unprecedented five hours. Civil society’s strong reaction prompted the formation of a parliamentary committee to investigate the events. BNR’s director was ousted in October. • In September, an outcry from right-wing political groups claimed the judiciary’s independence was threatened, after an Australian national, convicted of killing a law student in 2007, was granted parole.
    [Show full text]
  • POLIT-BAROMETER Country, with the New Chief Prosecutor Ivan Geshev Being the Main Player in This Process
    ANALYSE DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS The exacerbation of the politi- cal situation in the country in the first months of this year is due to the shift of political and economic strata in the POLIT-BAROMETER country, with the new Chief Prosecutor Ivan Geshev being the main player in this process. Year 20 Issue 1 January - February, 2020 The escalation of tensions be- tween the president and the Georgi Karasimeonov (Ed.) government shows that it will be very difficult to find points of agreement for dialogue between them. Tensions in BSP are mount- ing with regard to the up- coming internal elections, which will decide who will be the party leader. FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG – POLIT-BAROMETER DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS POLIT-BAROMETER Year 20 Issue 1 January - February, 2020 CONTENTS Contents 1. THE POLITICAL SITUATION 2 2. THE CONDITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PARTY SYSTEM 5 3. PUBLIC OPINION 7 4. MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND FORECASTS 8 1 FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG – POLIT-BAROMETER 1 THE POLITICAL SITUATION The political situation in the first months of the year was ex- cided to supply Pernik with water from Belmeken Reservoir tremely dynamic and tense. The water crisis in the town of and the Rila Water Supply, which pipes some of the water Pernik, close to Sofia, intensified, and led to protests by lo- to Sofia. For this purpose, the construction of a completely cals. The reasons for the crisis are a combination of factors: new 13-km water pipeline from the village of Malo Buchino wrong decisions in government, poor management of the to Pernik began.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: the Bulgarian National Assembly
    Directorate-General for the Presidency Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments Factsheet: The Bulgarian National Assembly 1. At a glance The Republic of Bulgaria is a parliamentary democracy. The Bulgarian Parliament (National Assembly or Narodno sabranie) is a unicameral body, which consists of 240 deputies elected directly by the voters from 32 constituencies to four-year terms, on the basis of the proportional system. Political parties must gather a minimum of 4% of the national vote in order to enter the Assembly. The National Assembly has three basic functions: legislative, control and constitutive. The major function of the National Assembly is to legislate by adopting, amending and rescinding laws. The control function of the National Assembly is to exercise oversight of the executive. The MPs contribute to effective work of the government and state administration by addressing questions and interpellations, and by requiring reports. The constitutive function of the National Assembly is to elect, on a motion from the Prime Minister, the members of the Council of Ministers, the President and members of the National Audit Office, the Governor of the Bulgarian National Bank and his/her Deputies, and the heads of other institutions established by a law. The current minority coalition government under Premier Minister Boyko Borisov (GERB/EPP), sworn in on 7 November 2014, is composed of the conservative GERB party (EPP) and the centre- right Reformist Bloc (RB/EPP), with the support of nationalist Patriotic Front coalition
    [Show full text]
  • The Fog of Modern Warfare Russia’S Disinformation Campaign in Bulgaria
    THE FOG OF MODERN WARFARE RUSSIA’S DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN IN BULGARIA By Vanya Denevska, parliamentary secretary, Bulgarian Ministry of Defence n early 2018, Russian hybrid actions were stepped up pro-Russian Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP). The pages are to hinder the European integration of Western Balkan a source of fake news and are popular, with names such as countries by exploiting historic relations and issues, as “Let’s return Bulgaria to the Bulgarians.” These sites have well as the unity of the Orthodox Church. For instance, anonymous owners and have become sources from which the Russian Orthodox Church posted a video on its the disinformation stream starts. Subsequently, they are Iwebsite of Russian Patriarch Kirill expressing his resent- quoted by other media and on social networks. Through ment of statements by Bulgarian President Rumen Radev, the sharing of trending commentary, an illusion is created who had spoken of the roles that countries other than that false claims are real facts. The goal is to provoke Russia had played in Bulgaria’s liberation from Ottoman discussion in the official media that grows into a divisive rule. Kirill called Radev’s statements “false historical inter- public debate. pretations.” Later, the Russian news agency Tass circulated a speech in which Kirill emphasized that Bulgaria was liberated by Russia and not by “Poland, nor Lithuania, nor other countries,” overlooking the fact that soldiers from those countries had died in the fighting. The messaging was part of a well-structured Russian hierarchical system that plans, develops and implements strategies for the coordinated use of military and nonmili- tary instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019
    Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019 Codebook: SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET – GOVERNMENT COMPOSITION 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set provides detailed information on party composition, reshuffles, duration, reason for termination and on the type of government for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member countries. The data begins in 1959 for the 23 countries formerly included in the CPDS I, respectively, in 1966 for Malta, in 1976 for Cyprus, in 1990 for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Latvia and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia. In order to obtain information on both the change of ideological composition and the following gap between the new an old cabinet, the supplement contains alternative data for the year 1959. The government variables in the main Comparative Political Data Set are based upon the data presented in this supplement. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. Please quote this data set as: Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann. 2021. Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. These (former) assistants have made major contributions to the dataset, without which CPDS would not exist. In chronological and descending order: Angela Odermatt, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, Sarah Engler, David Weisstanner, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlène Gerber, Philipp Leimgruber, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegal.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI RSCAS Working Paper 2020/84 the Politics of Differentiated Integration: What Do Governments Want? Country Report – Bulgari
    RSCAS 2020/84 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) The Politics of Differentiated Integration: What do Governments Want? Country Report – Bulgaria Elitsa Markova European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) The Politics of Differentiated Integration: What do Governments Want? Country Report – Bulgaria Elitsa Markova EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2020/84 Terms of access and reuse for this work are governed by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC- BY 4.0) International license. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper series and number, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © Elitsa Markova, 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0) International license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published in November 2020 by the European University Institute. Badia Fiesolana, via dei Roccettini 9 I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual author(s) and not those of the European University Institute. This publication is available in Open Access in Cadmus, the EUI Research Repository: https://cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics.
    [Show full text]