DOCSLIB.ORG

Dopamine Agonists: Their Role in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dopamine Agonists: Their Role in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:685–690 685 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.68.6.685 on 1 June 2000. Downloaded from EDITORIAL Dopamine agonists: their role in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease Parkinson’s disease is a chronic and disabling illness. There inirole and pramipexole are non-ergoline agonists. is still some uncertainty in its diagnosis, particularly in the Apomorphine, one of the first dopamine agonists shown to early stages, as some other neurological conditions present improve parkinsonian symptoms, is a combined D1 and D2 with similar clinical features. There has been wide variation agonist but has to be administered subcutaneously. Its use in the management of Parkinson’s disease due to a lack of has been well documented and will not be discussed in this consensus on the best approach. Recently, United review.12–14 Kingdom specific guidelines for the management of Parkinson’s disease have been produced1 which provide, where possible, evidence based recommendations and the Rationale for use collective opinion of a Parkinson’s Disease Consensus Dopamine agonists have proved antiparkinsonian activity.15 Working Group, whose members have substantial experi- Initially, they were introduced as an adjunct to levodopa ence in managing patients with the disease. treatment in patients exhibiting fluctuating motor re- Current drug therapy in Parkinson’s disease is sympto- sponses and dyskinesias associated with its chronic use.15–17 matic and primarily aimed at restoring dopaminergic func- Addition of agonists to these patients’ regimes allows tion in the striatum. Levodopa, in combination with a around a 20%-30% reduction in the dose of levodopa in peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, is still the most eVective practice and leads to improvement in the disabling compli- symptomatic treatment.2 Levodopa enters dopaminergic cations. Dopamine agonists have also been successfully neurons where it is metabolised to dopamine, replacing the used as monotherapy in de novo patients with the intention depleted endogenous neurotransmitter. Along with its of delaying treatment with levodopa and consequently proved eYcacy, levodopa is well tolerated, easy to adminis- deferring the onset of complications.18–21 ter, and relatively inexpensive.3 However, long term use is Dopamine agonists are not metabolised by oxidative http://jnnp.bmj.com/ associated with disabling complications such as fluctuating pathways and so do not lead to the cytotoxic free radical motor responses and dyskinesias4–6 and narrowing of the formation that may be associated with metabolism of therapeutic window.7 In addition, levodopa is toxic in vitro dopamine. By suppressing endogenous dopamine release it to dopaminergic neurons8 and in vivo its use could lead to is also conceivable that they may protect dopaminergic formation of cytotoxic free radicals when exogenous neurons from injury, a theoretical concern if high concen- dopamine is decarboxylated; these would cause damage to trations of exogenous dopamine are present. The reason surviving dopaminergic neurons and potentially exacerbate why motor complications are less often encountered with on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. the disease.910 dopamine agonists than with levodopa is not fully In the light of these complications, the United Kingdom understood. It may be related to the longer half life of guidelines suggest that pharmacological intervention dopamine agonists and diVerences in receptor selectivity.22 should be delayed until a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease Chase (1998) has suggested that pulsatile use of levodopa has been confirmed by a specialist in movement disorders leads to an imbalance of basal ganglia opioid concentra- and the symptoms start to interfere with daily life.1 In tions and resetting of voltage gated channels in N-methyl- addition, the United Kingdom guidelines recommend that D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors.23 The de novo use of treatment with levodopa should be delayed for as long as dopamine agonists may help to avoid these downstream possible providing alternative drugs, such as dopamine pharmacological changes in the striatum and pallidum.24 agonists, can achieve adequate symptom control. Various therapeutic strategies may be adopted when starting treatment of Parkinson’s disease in an attempt to delay and minimise the long term complications associated The role of dopamine agonists with levodopa. One approach is to start treatment with low DEFINITION dose levodopa and, if the eYcacy declines, to add a Dopamine agonists exert their antiparkinsonian eVects by dopamine agonist instead of increasing the levodopa acting directly on dopamine receptors and mimicking the dose.19 Conversely, treatment may be started with a endogenous neurotransmitter.11 There are two subclasses dopamine agonist or alternative symptomatic agent and of dopamine agonists: ergoline and non-ergoline agonists. low dose levodopa added later if required. Finally, it has Both of these subclasses target dopamine D2-type recep- been suggested that treatment should be initiated with a tors. The ergoline dopamine agonists include bromocrip- combination of low doses of levodopa and a dopamine tine, pergolide, lisuride, and cabergoline, whereas rop- agonist.25 686 Brooks J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.68.6.685 on 1 June 2000. Downloaded from Summary of key characteristics for dopamine agonists (data adapted from Utti and Ahlskog)15 BPeLCRPr Receptor activity: agonist (antagonist) D2 (D1)D2,D1 D2 (D1)D2 D2 D2,D1 Pharmacological properties Ergot Ergot Ergot Long acting ergot Non-ergot Non-ergot Plasma half life (hours) 3–8 16 1–7 65 6 7–9 Time to peak plasma concentration (hours) 1–2 1.5 1 0.5–4 1.5 2 Administration (max dosage, UK, ABPI data) Oral (10–40 mg/daily) Oral (<5 mg/day)* Oral, subcutaneous Oral (20 mg/day) Oral (<24 mg/day) NA (<5 mg/day) B=bromocriptine; Pe=pergolide; L=lisuride; C=cabergoline; R=ropinirole; Pr=pramipexole; NA=not available. *Some clinics exceed this; the highest daily dose prescribed for several patients with refractory Parkinson’s disease has exceeded 30 mg. In the absence of clear evidence that any particular agent Lisuride has an advantage in slowing or preventing progression of Lisuride, like bromocriptine, stimulates D2-like dopamine Parkinson’s disease, the United Kingdom guidelines receptors. Lisuride is as eVective and well tolerated as bro- recommended that the choice of first line symptomatic mocriptine when used in combination with levodopa in therapy be made on an individual patient basis. Various patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease experiencing a interrelated factors should be borne in mind, including deteriorating response to levodopa and motor age, severity of disease, cognitive impairment, and fluctuations.36 In an open non-randomised study, combina- intercurrent illness.26 For advanced Parkinson’s disease, tion therapy with lisuride and levodopa, over 10 years, has and in elderly patients, levodopa was thought to be the been shown to decrease and delay the development of agent of choice because of its clinical potency and conven- motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in patients with early ience. However, in younger patients with mild to moderate disease compared with therapy with levodopa alone while symptoms, de novo use of dopamine agonists was maintaining an equivalent therapeutic response.37 Trials suggested to be a more appropriate first line option,1 as have also shown that lisuride provides eVective mono- they seem to be as eVective as levodopa in early disease and therapy and, when used in conjunction with levodopa, per- delay its use,21 22 27 thus minimising the long term problems mits reduction of levodopa dose.37 38 associated with levodopa. A summary of the key character- istics of dopamine agonists is shown in the table. Cabergoline Cabergoline is a long acting ergoline dopamine agonist ERGOT-DERIVED DOPAMINE AGONISTS with selective aYnity for D2-like dopamine receptors and a 3 The early oral dopamine agonists were ergot derivatives long plasma half life of 65 hours. Once daily cabergoline has been shown to be eVective as monotherapy in de novo acting primarily on the D2-like (D2,D3 and D4) dopamine receptors (although pergolide has weak D agonist activity patients, reducing the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating 1 Scale (UPDRS) motor score by up to 30% and the time in and bromocriptine has D1 antagonist activity). Examples of this type of dopamine agonist are bromocriptine, pergolide, “oV” by up to 60%. It is also eVective as adjunct therapy to 27 lisuride, and the long acting ergoline, cabergoline. levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. Cabergoline monotherapy for up to 1 year has been shown to be only slightly less eVective than levodopa treatment. Bromocriptine Rinne et al found that more than 60% of de novo patients Bromocriptine has been in regular use as adjunct therapy could be managed on cabergoline alone for at least a period in patients receiving levodopa to allow lower doses of levo- of 1 year.3 Recent reports have also confirmed the eYcacy http://jnnp.bmj.com/ dopa to be used and to improve “end of dose” motor of cabergoline in delaying motor complications.25 39 28 fluctuations. Use of bromocriptine as monotherapy in de The eYcacy of cabergoline as adjunct therapy to novo patients has been shown to delay the need for levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease and levodopa treatment and the occurrence of motor motor complications has been investigated in studies total- 19 complications. Generally a three times daily regime has ling more than 1500 patients.39 Cabergoline treatment been employed. allowed the levodopa dose to be significantly reduced when compared with placebo (18% v 3%). The activities of daily Pergolide living (ADL) score was also improved by cabergoline treat- on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Pergolide has similarly been shown to improve symptoms ment (23%) compared with placebo (4%). Comparisons of of Parkinson’s disease both when used as monotherapy and cabergoline with bromocriptine have shown cabergoline to in combination with levodopa.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INVESTIGATION of NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS for the DEVELOPMENT of OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS by Katherine M
    INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS By Katherine M. Prevatt-Smith Submitted to the graduate degree program in Medicinal Chemistry and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Thomas E. Prisinzano _________________________________ Dr. Brian S. J. Blagg _________________________________ Dr. Michael F. Rafferty _________________________________ Dr. Paul R. Hanson _________________________________ Dr. Susan M. Lunte Date Defended: July 18, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Katherine M. Prevatt-Smith certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS _________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Thomas E. Prisinzano Date approved: July 18, 2012 ii ABSTRACT Kappa opioid (KOP) receptors have been suggested as an alternative target to the mu opioid (MOP) receptor for the treatment of pain because KOP activation is associated with fewer negative side-effects (respiratory depression, constipation, tolerance, and dependence). The KOP receptor has also been implicated in several abuse-related effects in the central nervous system (CNS). KOP ligands have been investigated as pharmacotherapies for drug abuse; KOP agonists have been shown to modulate dopamine concentrations in the CNS as well as attenuate the self-administration of cocaine in a variety of species, and KOP antagonists have potential in the treatment of relapse. One drawback of current opioid ligand investigation is that many compounds are based on the morphine scaffold and thus have similar properties, both positive and negative, to the parent molecule. Thus there is increasing need to discover new chemical scaffolds with opioid receptor activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Emulated Clinical Trials from Longitudinal Real-World Data Efficiently Identify Candidates for Neurological Disease Modification
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.20171447; this version posted November 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Emulated Clinical Trials from Longitudinal Real-World Data Efficiently Identify Candidates for Neurological Disease Modification: Examples from Parkinson's Disease Daphna Laifenfeld, PhD1,a,†, Chen Yanover, PhD2,b,†, Michal Ozery-Flato, PhD3,†, Oded Shaham, PhD2,c, Michal Rozen-Zvi, PhD3,4,*, Nirit Lev, MD/PhD1,d,‡ , Yaara Goldschmidt, PhD2,e,‡, Iris Grossman, PhD1,f,‡ 1Formerly Teva Pharmaceuticals Research & Development, Petach Tikva, Israel; 2Formerly IBM Research – Haifa, Israel; 3IBM Research – Haifa, Israel; 4Faculty of Medicine, The HeBrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; aPresent Address: Ibex Medical Analytics, Tel Aviv, Israel; bPresent Address: KI Research Institute, Kfar Malal, Israel; cPresent Address: MeMed Dx, Haifa, Israel; dPresent Address: Meir Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; ePresent Address: K Health, Tel Aviv, Israel; fPresent Address: Gross Advantage, Brookline, MA, USA; † These authors contriButed equally and share first authorship. ‡ These authors contriButed equally to this work. * Corresponding author: Michal Rosen-Zvi [email protected] Haifa University Campus, Mount Carmel Haifa, 3498825, Israel Tel: (972) 04-8296517 Keywords: Real World Data; Clinical Evidence; Parkinson’s disease; Artificial Intelligence; Causal Inference; Rasagiline; Zolpidem; Disease Modifying Therapeutics; Repurposing. NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Biased Allosteric Regulation of the Prostaglandin F2α Receptor: From
    Biased Allosteric Regulation of the Prostaglandin F2 Receptor: From Small Molecules to Large Receptor Complexes By Eugénie Goupil Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics McGill University, Montréal, Canada November, 2012 A thesis submitted to McGill in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of philosophy Copyright ©Eugénie Goupil, 2012 ''In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.'' -Lawrence Peter ''Yogi'' Berra ii Abstract G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of cell surface receptors, and thus some of the most important targets for drug discovery. By binding to the orthosteric site where endogenous ligands bind, agonists and antagonists differentially modulate signals sent downstream from these receptors. New evidence suggests that GPCRs possess topographically distinct or allosteric binding sites, which may differentially modulate agonist- and antagonist-mediated responses to selectively affect distinct signalling pathways coupled to the same receptor. These sites may either positively or negatively regulate receptor activity, depending on the pathway in question, and thus can act as biased ligands, leading to functional selectivity (or ligand-directed signalling). Another way of allosterically regulating GPCR signalling is through receptor oligomerization, which has recently emerged as a common mechanism for regulating receptor function. The GPCR for prostaglandin F2 FP, is implicated in many important physiological responses, such as parturition, smooth muscle cell contraction and blood pressure regulation. Therefore, evaluating the potential use of allosteric modulators of FP to fine-tune PGF2-mediated signals, as well as generating a better understanding of its putative oligomerization partners would be of significant pharmacological and clinical interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Apo-Ropinirole
    New Zealand Data Sheet APO-ROPINIROLE 1. PRODUCT NAME APO-ROPINIROLE 0.25mg, 0.5mg, 1mg, 2mg, 3mg, 4mg and 5mg tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Ropinirole hydrochloride 0.25mg Ropinirole hydrochloride 0.5mg Ropinirole hydrochloride 1mg Ropinirole hydrochloride 2mg Ropinirole hydrochloride 3mg Ropinirole hydrochloride 4mg Ropinirole hydrochloride 5mg Excipient(s) with known effect Contains lactose. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM APO-ROPINIROLE is available as oral, film coated tablets in the following strengths: APO-ROPINIROLE 0.25mg tablets are white, pentagonal, biconvex film-coated tablet identified by an engraved “ROP” over “.25” on one side and “APO’ on the other side. Each tablet typically weighs about 153mg. APO-ROPINIROLE 0.5mg tablets are yellow, pentagonal, biconvex film-coated tablet identified by an engraved “ROP” over “.5” on one side and “APO’ on the other side. Each tablet typically weighs about 153mg. APO-ROPINIROLE 1mg tablets are green, pentagonal, biconvex film-coated tablet identified by an engraved “ROP” over “1” on one side and “APO’ on the other side. Each tablet typically weighs about 153mg. APO-ROPINIROLE 2mg tablets are pink, pentagonal, biconvex film-coated tablet identified by an engraved “ROP” over “2” on one side and “APO’ on the other side. Each tablet typically weighs about 153mg. APO-ROPINIROLE 3mg tablets are purple, pentagonal, biconvex film-coated tablet identified by an engraved “ROP” over “3” on one side and “APO’ on the other side. Each tablet typically weighs about 153mg. APO-ROPINIROLE 4mg tablets are pale brown, pentagonal, biconvex film-coated tablet identified by an engraved “ROP” over “4” on one side and “APO’ on the other side.
    [Show full text]
  • From NMDA Receptor Hypofunction to the Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia J
    REVIEW The Neuropsychopharmacology of Phencyclidine: From NMDA Receptor Hypofunction to the Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia J. David Jentsch, Ph.D., and Robert H. Roth, Ph.D. Administration of noncompetitive NMDA/glutamate effects of these drugs are discussed, especially with regard to receptor antagonists, such as phencyclidine (PCP) and differing profiles following single-dose and long-term ketamine, to humans induces a broad range of exposure. The neurochemical effects of NMDA receptor schizophrenic-like symptomatology, findings that have antagonist administration are argued to support a contributed to a hypoglutamatergic hypothesis of neurobiological hypothesis of schizophrenia, which includes schizophrenia. Moreover, a history of experimental pathophysiology within several neurotransmitter systems, investigations of the effects of these drugs in animals manifested in behavioral pathology. Future directions for suggests that NMDA receptor antagonists may model some the application of NMDA receptor antagonist models of behavioral symptoms of schizophrenia in nonhuman schizophrenia to preclinical and pathophysiological research subjects. In this review, the usefulness of PCP are offered. [Neuropsychopharmacology 20:201–225, administration as a potential animal model of schizophrenia 1999] © 1999 American College of is considered. To support the contention that NMDA Neuropsychopharmacology. Published by Elsevier receptor antagonist administration represents a viable Science Inc. model of schizophrenia, the behavioral and neurobiological KEY WORDS: Ketamine; Phencyclidine; Psychotomimetic; widely from the administration of purportedly psychot- Memory; Catecholamine; Schizophrenia; Prefrontal cortex; omimetic drugs (Snyder 1988; Javitt and Zukin 1991; Cognition; Dopamine; Glutamate Jentsch et al. 1998a), to perinatal insults (Lipska et al. Biological psychiatric research has seen the develop- 1993; El-Khodor and Boksa 1997; Moore and Grace ment of many putative animal models of schizophrenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Palliative Medicine Clinical Guidelines Group Guidelines on the Use of Antiemetics Author(S): Dr Annette Edwards (Chai
    Yorkshire Palliative Medicine Clinical Guidelines Group Guidelines on the use of Antiemetics Author(s): Dr Annette Edwards (Chair) and Deborah Royle on behalf of the Yorkshire Palliative Medicine Clinical Guidelines Group Overall objective : To provide guidance on the evidence for the use of antiemetics in specialist palliative care. Search Strategy: Search strategy: Medline, Embase and Cinahl databases were searched using the words nausea, vomit$, emesis, antiemetic and drug name. Review Date: March 2008 Competing interests: None declared Disclaimer: These guidelines are the property of the Yorkshire Palliative Medicine Clinical Guidelines Group. They are intended to be used by qualified, specialist palliative care professionals as an information resource. They should be used in the clinical context of each individual patient’s needs. The clinical guidelines group takes no responsibility for any consequences of any actions taken as a result of using these guidelines. Contact Details: Dr Annette Edwards, Macmillan Consultant in Palliative Medicine, Department of Palliative Medicine, Pinderfields General Hospital, Aberford Road, Wakefield, WF1 4DG Tel: 01924 212290 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction: Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. A careful history, examination and appropriate investigations may help to infer the pathophysiological mechanism involved. Where possible and clinically appropriate aetiological factors should be corrected. Antiemetics are chosen based on the likely mechanism and the neurotransmitters involved in the emetic pathway. However, a recent systematic review has highlighted that evidence for the management of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer is sparse. (Glare 2004) The following drug and non-drug treatments were reviewed to assess the strength of evidence for their use as antiemetics with particular emphasis on their use in the palliative care population.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhibits Dyskinesia Expression and Normalizes Motor Activity in 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine-Treated Primates
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 8, 2003 • 23(27):9107–9115 • 9107 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (Ecstasy) Inhibits Dyskinesia Expression and Normalizes Motor Activity in 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine-Treated Primates Mahmoud M. Iravani, Michael J. Jackson, Mikko Kuoppama¨ki, Lance A. Smith, and Peter Jenner Neurodegenerative Disease Research Centre, Guy’s, King’s, and St. Thomas’ School of Biomedical Sciences, King’s College, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom Ecstasy [3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)] was shown to prolong the action of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) while suppressing dyskinesia in a single patient with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The clinical basis of this effect of MDMA is unknown but may relate to its actions on either dopaminergic or serotoninergic systems in brain. In normal, drug-naive common marmosets, MDMA administration suppressed motor activity and exploratory behavior. In 1-methyl- 4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine(MPTP)-treated, L-DOPA-primedcommonmarmosets,MDMAtransientlyrelievedmotordisability but over a period of 60 min worsened motor symptoms. When given in conjunction with L-DOPA, however, MDMA markedly decreased dyskinesia by reducing chorea and to a lesser extent dystonia and decreased locomotor activity to the level observed in normal animals. MDMA similarly alleviated dyskinesia induced by the selective dopamine D2/3 agonist pramipexole. The actions of MDMA appeared to be mediated through 5-HT mechanisms because its effects were fully blocked by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine. Furthermore,theeffectofMDMAon L-DOPA-inducedmotoractivityanddyskinesiawaspartiallyinhibitedby5-HT1a/bantagonists.The ability of MDMA to inhibit dyskinesia results from its broad spectrum of action on 5-HT systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroenhancement in Healthy Adults, Part I: Pharmaceutical
    l Rese ca arc ni h li & C f B o i o l e Journal of a t h n Fond et al., J Clinic Res Bioeth 2015, 6:2 r i c u s o J DOI: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000213 ISSN: 2155-9627 Clinical Research & Bioethics Review Article Open Access Neuroenhancement in Healthy Adults, Part I: Pharmaceutical Cognitive Enhancement: A Systematic Review Fond G1,2*, Micoulaud-Franchi JA3, Macgregor A2, Richieri R3,4, Miot S5,6, Lopez R2, Abbar M7, Lancon C3 and Repantis D8 1Université Paris Est-Créteil, Psychiatry and Addiction Pole University Hospitals Henri Mondor, Inserm U955, Eq 15 Psychiatric Genetics, DHU Pe-psy, FondaMental Foundation, Scientific Cooperation Foundation Mental Health, National Network of Schizophrenia Expert Centers, F-94000, France 2Inserm 1061, University Psychiatry Service, University of Montpellier 1, CHU Montpellier F-34000, France 3POLE Academic Psychiatry, CHU Sainte-Marguerite, F-13274 Marseille, Cedex 09, France 4 Public Health Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, EA 3279, F-13385 Marseille, Cedex 05, France 5Inserm U1061, Idiopathic Hypersomnia Narcolepsy National Reference Centre, Unit of sleep disorders, University of Montpellier 1, CHU Montpellier F-34000, Paris, France 6Inserm U952, CNRS UMR 7224, Pierre and Marie Curie University, F-75000, Paris, France 7CHU Carémeau, University of Nîmes, Nîmes, F-31000, France 8Department of Psychiatry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Eschenallee 3, 14050 Berlin, Germany *Corresponding author: Dr. Guillaume Fond, Pole de Psychiatrie, Hôpital A. Chenevier, 40 rue de Mesly, Créteil F-94010, France, Tel: (33)178682372; Fax: (33)178682381; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: January 06, 2015, Accepted date: February 23, 2015, Published date: February 28, 2015 Copyright: © 2015 Fond G, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Phencyclidine: an Update
    Phencyclidine: An Update U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration Phencyclidine: An Update Editor: Doris H. Clouet, Ph.D. Division of Preclinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse and New York State Division of Substance Abuse Services NIDA Research Monograph 64 1986 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administratlon National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, Maryland 20657 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 NIDA Research Monographs are prepared by the research divisions of the National lnstitute on Drug Abuse and published by its Office of Science The primary objective of the series is to provide critical reviews of research problem areas and techniques, the content of state-of-the-art conferences, and integrative research reviews. its dual publication emphasis is rapid and targeted dissemination to the scientific and professional community. Editorial Advisors MARTIN W. ADLER, Ph.D. SIDNEY COHEN, M.D. Temple University School of Medicine Los Angeles, California Philadelphia, Pennsylvania SYDNEY ARCHER, Ph.D. MARY L. JACOBSON Rensselaer Polytechnic lnstitute National Federation of Parents for Troy, New York Drug Free Youth RICHARD E. BELLEVILLE, Ph.D. Omaha, Nebraska NB Associates, Health Sciences Rockville, Maryland REESE T. JONES, M.D. KARST J. BESTEMAN Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric lnstitute Alcohol and Drug Problems Association San Francisco, California of North America Washington, D.C. DENISE KANDEL, Ph.D GILBERT J. BOTV N, Ph.D. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Cornell University Medical College Columbia University New York, New York New York, New York JOSEPH V.
    [Show full text]
  • Pramipexole V2.1 Last Reviewed: 22/04/2021 Review Date: 22/04/2024
    Pramipexole V2.1 Last reviewed: 22/04/2021 Review date: 22/04/2024 Pramipexole Traffic light classification- Amber 2 Information sheet for Primary Care Prescribers CLINICAL INFORMATION Key points/interactions Nausea is a common early side effect but usually responds to domperidone (10mg tds, or lowest effective dose – see MHRA advice) Ropinirole MR is first line dopamine agonist. Pramipexole MR should be reserved for patients in whom this is not suitable- see formulary. Dopamine agonists may cause compulsive/addictive behaviours such as gambling, compulsive shopping and hyper sexuality. Patients rarely recognise such changes as side effects and rarely report them unless specifically asked. Licensed Indications Treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Pramipexole may be used alone (without levodopa) or in combination with levodopa throughout the disease, through to late stages when the effect of levodopa wears off or becomes inconsistent and fluctuations of the therapeutic effect occur (end of dose or “on-off” fluctuations). Therapeutic Summary As per the licensed indication. NICE recommendations for the use of Pramipexole in Parkinson’s disease are: Consider a choice of dopamine agonists, levodopa or monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors for people in the early stages of Parkinson's disease whose motor symptoms do not impact their quality of life. Do not offer ergot-derived dopamine agonists as first-line treatment for Parkinson's disease. Offer a choice of dopamine agonists, MAO-B inhibitors or catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT)
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Approaches for Genome-Wide Interrogation of The
    MINIREVIEW THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 290, NO. 32, pp. 19471–19477, August 7, 2015 © 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Published in the U.S.A. 5-HT serotonin receptor agonism have long been docu- Integrated Approaches for 2B mented to induce severe, life-threatening valvular heart disease Genome-wide Interrogation of (6–8). Indeed, based on the potent 5-HT2B agonist activity of the Druggable Non-olfactory G certain ergot derivatives used in treating Parkinson disease and migraine headaches (e.g. pergolide, cabergoline, and dihydroer- Protein-coupled Receptor gotamine), we correctly predicted that these medications * would also induce valvular heart disease (7, 8). Two of these Superfamily drugs (pergolide and cabergoline) were withdrawn from the Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 22, 2015, DOI 10.1074/jbc.R115.654764 Bryan L. Roth1 and Wesley K. Kroeze international market following large-scale trials demonstrating From the Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina their life-threating side effects (8, 9). In follow-up studies, we Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 surveyed 2200 FDA-approved and investigational medications, finding that 27 had potentially significant 5-HT2B agonism, of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are frequent and fruit- which 6 are currently FDA-approved (guanfacine, quinidine, ful targets for drug discovery and development, as well as being xylometazoline, oxymetazoline, fenoldopam, and ropinirole) off-targets for the side effects of a variety of medications. Much (10). Interestingly, of the 2200 drugs screened, around 30% dis- of the druggable non-olfactory human GPCR-ome remains played significant 5-HT2B antagonist activity (10), indicating under-interrogated, and we present here various approaches that 5-HT2B receptors represent a “promiscuous target” for that we and others have used to shine light into these previously approved and candidate medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) Promotes Social Behavior Through Mtorc1 in the Excitatory Neurotransmission
    Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) promotes social behavior through mTORC1 in the excitatory neurotransmission Danilo De Gregorioa,b,1, Jelena Popicb,2,3, Justine P. Ennsa,3, Antonio Inserraa,3, Agnieszka Skaleckab, Athanasios Markopoulosa, Luca Posaa, Martha Lopez-Canula, He Qianzia, Christopher K. Laffertyc, Jonathan P. Brittc, Stefano Comaia,d, Argel Aguilar-Vallese, Nahum Sonenbergb,1,4, and Gabriella Gobbia,f,1,4 aNeurobiological Psychiatry Unit, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 1A1; bDepartment of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 1A3; cDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 1B1; dDivision of Neuroscience, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; eDepartment of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1S 5B6; and fMcGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 1A1 Contributed by Nahum Sonenberg, November 10, 2020 (sent for review October 5, 2020; reviewed by Marc G. Caron and Mark Geyer) Clinical studies have reported that the psychedelic lysergic acid receptor (6), but also displays affinity for the 5-HT1A receptor diethylamide (LSD) enhances empathy and social behavior (SB) in (7–9). Several studies have demonstrated that LSD modulates humans, but its mechanism of action remains elusive. Using a glutamatergic neurotransmission and, indirectly, the α-amino- multidisciplinary approach including in vivo electrophysiology, 3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) receptors. optogenetics, behavioral paradigms, and molecular biology, the Indeed, in vitro studies have shown that LSD increased the ex- effects of LSD on SB and glutamatergic neurotransmission in the citatory response of interneurons in the piriform cortex following medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) were studied in male mice.
    [Show full text]