Introduced Tree Species in European Forests Opportunities and Challenges

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduced Tree Species in European Forests Opportunities and Challenges Introduced tree species in European forests Opportunities and challenges 3 Introduced tree species in European forests IMPRESSUM: Wir danken Winfried Kraus und Andreas Schuck für die sprachliche Überarbeitung und Korrektur der deutschen Fassung. Die deutsche Übersetzung wurde herausgegeben mit Unterstützung des Bundesamtes für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft BAFU (Schweiz), den Bayerischen Staatsforsten (BaySF), dem Kanton Aargau (Schweiz) und dem Landesbetrieb ForstBW. Zitierempfehlung: Kraus D., Krumm F. (Hrsg.) 2013. Integrative Ansätze als Chance für die Erhal- tung der Artenvielfalt in Wäldern. European Forest Institute. 300 S. Layout: design.idee GbR, Büro für Gestaltung, Erfurt Druck: rombach digitale manufaktur, Freiburg Haftungsausschluss: Bei vorliegendem Band handelt es sich um den Abschlussbericht des vom Zentraleuropäischen Regionalbüro des European Forest Institute – EFICENT – durchgeführten Inte- grate-Projekts. Die Inhalte und Meinungen in dieser Veröffentlichung sind allein die der Autoren und entsprechen nicht unbedingt dem Standpunkt des European Forest Institute. ISBN xxx-xxx-xxxx-xx-x (Druckschrift) ISBN xxx-xxx-xxxx-xx-x (pdf-Format) Bildnachweise: Claus Bässler (S. 12), Michele Bozzano (S. 219 rechts), Heinz Bussler (S. 153 rechts, 299), Heinrich Holzer (S. 153 links, Umschlagrückseite Mitte), Heike Kappes (Umschlagrückseite links), Daniel Kraus (Titel, S. 5, 17, 18, 87 links und rechts, 218, 270), Frank Krumm (S. 86), Tomi Muukkonen (S. 152), Juri Nascimbene (Umschlagrückseite rechts), Albert Reif (S. 219 links). 4 Introduced tree species in European forests: Opportunites and challenges 5 Introduced tree species in European forests Contents Contributing authors, drafting comittee and reviews 10 Preface 15 Introduction 16 1 History of introduced and invasive tree species 25 1.1 European tree dynamics and invasions during the Quaternary 26 H. John B. Birks and Willy Tinner 1.2 The history of introduced tree speciesin Europe in a nutshell 50 Bart Nyssen, Uwe Eduard Schmidt, Bart Muys, Pieter Bas van der Lei and Patrick Pyttel 2 From introduced to invasive – the characteristics of invasiveness 63 2.1 Strangers in paradise How culture shapes attitudes towards introduced species 64 Uta Eser 2.2 What determines the invasiveness of tree species in central Europe? 74 Petr Pyšek 2.3 Can we predict whether a species will become invasive? 84 Tina Heger 2.4 Praise and damnation – perceptions towards introduced tree species vary and change with time 92 Uwe Starfinger and Ingo Kowarik 2.5 Co-invasion of invasive trees and their associated belowground mutualists 102 Martin A. Nuñez, Nahuel Policelli and Romina D. Dimarco 2.6 Maximising benefits and minimising harm associated with invasive introduced trees: lessons from South Africa 110 Brian W. van Wilgen 3 Management of introduced and invasive tree species – concepts and approaches 121 3.1 From impact studies to management actions: practicing risk analysis of introduced trees 124 Etienne Branquart, Bram D’hondt, Sonia Vanderhoeven and Sabrina Kumschick 3.2 European databases on invasive alien species 138 Annemarie Bastrup-Birk and Andreas Schuck 3.3 Assessment of invasive tree species in nature conservation and forestry – contradictions and coherence 148 Torsten Vor, Stefan Nehring, Andreas Bolte, Anke Höltermann 6 Contents 3.4 Eradication as an option for managing invasive tree species in protected areas 158 Livia Zapponi, Raffaele Cavalli, Emma Minari and Franco Mason 3.5 Introduced species in Polish National Parks: distribution, abundance and management approaches 168 Anna Gazda and Jerzy Szwagrzyk 3.6 Silvicultural strategies for introduced tree species in northern Italy 178 Fabio Meloni, Renzo Motta, Etienne Branquart, Tommaso Sitzia and Giorgio Vacchiano 3.7 Occurrence of introduced tree and shrub species in Italian regions in relation to the extent of planted and coppiced forests 194 Sabina Burrascano, Laura Celesti-Grapow and Carlo Blasi 3.8 Asian knotweeds – an example of a raising threat? 202 Fanny Dommanget, Paul Cavaillé, André Evette and François-Marie Martin 4 Key aspects of introduced and invasive tree species 213 4.1 Economic aspects of introduced tree species – opportunities and risks 214 Marc Hanewinkel and Jorie Knook 4.2 Importance of species competition and migration limitation for tree distributions during global change 226 Eliane S. Meier and Niklaus E. Zimmermann 4.3 Introduced or native tree species to maintain forest ecosystem services in a hotter and drier future? 236 Andreas Rigling, Arthur Gessler, Linda Feichtinger, Valentin Queloz and Thomas Wohlgemuth 4.4 Pathogens of introduced trees: prospects for biological control 248 Steve Woodward, Alberto Santini and Tuğba Doğmuş 4.5 Introduced tree species in central Europe – consequences for arthropod communities and species interactions 260 Martin M. Gossner 4.6 Introducing tree species in forests and the implications for biodiversity 280 Yann Dumas 5. Case studies of introduced tree species 301 5.1 Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.): from global ecology to local management – a case study from the Czech Republic 302 Michaela Vítková, Jan Pergl and Jiří Sádlo 5.2 Douglas fir in Freiburg City Forest: an introduced tree species in the light of multifunctional management objectives 316 Nicole Schmalfuss and Lucie Vítková 5.3 Quantifying invasiveness of Douglas fir on the basis of natural regeneration in southwestern Germany 326 Anja Bindewald and Hans-Gerhard Michiels 7 Introduced tree species in European forests 5.4 Challenges and opportunities – Sitka spruce in Ireland 340 Padraig O’Tuama, Paddy Purser, Faith Wilson and Áine Ní Dhubháin 5.5 TASMANIAN BLUE GUM IN PORTUGAL – OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS OF A WIDELY CULTIVATED SPECIES 348 Joaquim S. Silva and Margarida Tomé 5.6 Integrating black cherry in forest management in the Netherlands and Belgium 358 Bart Nyssen, Jan den Ouden, Kris Verheyen and Margot Vanhellemont 5.7 The spread of the tree of heaven in Switzerland 370 Jan Wunder, Simon Knüsel, Daniela Gurtner and Marco Conedera 5.8 Eastern white pine in the Czech Republic 382 Pavel Bednář, Petr Vaněk and Lucie Vítková 5.9 Using National Forest Inventories to assess the factors driving invasion in forest ecosystems: the case of silver wattle (Acacia dealbata) and blackwood (A. melanoxylon) in northwestern Spain 392 Laura Hernández, Isabel Cañellas and Ignacio Barbeito 5.10 Management of invasive tree species in the Donau-Auen National Park, Austria 402 Verena Quadt, Gerald Oitzinger and Karoline Zsak Text boxes 410 I. The challenge of Ash-dieback - A conceptual framework for practitioners in the Ortenaukreis (Germany) Daniela Vetter and Bernhard Mettendorf II. Code of Conduct on planted forests: recommended management for intro- duced and invasive tree species Giuseppe Brundu and David M. Richardson III. Insights into certification in relation to introduced and invasive tree species Marion Karmann, Owen Davies and Antonio Brunori IV. Interactions between game fauna and flora Alexander Held and Frank Krumm V. Research gaps for a reliable assessment of the effects of Douglas fir on forest biodiversity Kurt Bollmann and Rolf Holderegger Compilation of key messages 438 Frank Krumm and Lucie Vítková Synthesis 454 Project partners 460 8 9 Introduced tree species in European forests Contributing authors, drafting comittee and reviews authors Ignacio Barbeito, AgroParisTech and INRA, Nancy, France Annemarie Bastrup-Birk, European Environmental Agency (EEA), Denmark Pieter Bas van der Lei, Wageningen University, The Netherlands Pavel Bednář, The Czech Academy of Sciences - Global Change Research Institute, Czech Repu- blic Anja Bindewald, Forest Research Institute Baden-Württemberg (FVA), Germany H. John B. Birks, Bergen University, Norway and University College London, United Kingdom Carlo Blasi, University of Rome, Italy Kurt Bollmann, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland Andreas Bolte, Thünen Institute of Forest Ecosystems, Germany Etienne Branquart, Directorate General for Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment, Service Public de Wallonie, Belgium Giuseppe Brundu, University of Sassari, Italy Antonio Brunori, PEFC, Italy Sabina Burrascano, University of Rome, Italy Marc Castellnou, Bomberos de Generalitat de Cataluña, Área GRAF, Spain Isabel Cañellas, INIA-CIFOR Madrid, Spain Paul Cavaillé, Université Grenoble Alpes and Irstea, UR EMGR, Centre de Grenoble, France Raffaele Cavalli, Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, Italy Laura Celesti-Grapow, University of Rome, Italy Marco Conedera, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Cadenazzo, Switzerland Owen Davies, FSC UK, United Kingdom Bram D’hondt, Ghent University, Belgium Romina D. Dimarco, INTA-CONICET, Argentina Tuğba Doğmuş, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey Fanny Dommanget, Université Grenoble Alpes and Irstea, UR EMGR, Centre de Grenoble, Fran- ce Yann Dumas, Irstea, Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France Uta Eser, Office for Environmental Ethics, Germany André Evette, Université Grenoble Alpes and Irstea, UR EMGR, Centre de Grenoble, France Linda Feichtinger, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland Anna Gazda, University of Agriculture, Krakow, Poland Arthur Gessler, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland Martin M. Gossner, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Recommended publications
  • Two New Chrysomyxa Rust Species on the Endemic Plant, Picea Asperata in Western China, and Expanded Description of C
    Phytotaxa 292 (3): 218–230 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.292.3.2 Two new Chrysomyxa rust species on the endemic plant, Picea asperata in western China, and expanded description of C. succinea JING CAO1, CHENG-MING TIAN1, YING-MEI LIANG2 & CHONG-JUAN YOU1* 1The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China 2Museum of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Two new rust species, Chrysomyxa diebuensis and C. zhuoniensis, on Picea asperata are recognized by morphological characters and DNA sequence data. A detailed description, illustrations, and discussion concerning morphologically similar and phylogenetically closely related species are provided for each species. From light and scanning electron microscopy observations C. diebuensis is characterized by the nailhead to peltate aeciospores, with separated stilt-like base. C. zhuoni- ensis differs from other known Chrysomyxa species in the annulate aeciospores with distinct longitudinal smooth cap at ends of spores, as well as with a broken, fissured edge. Analysis based on internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) partial gene sequences reveals that the two species cluster as a highly supported group in the phylogenetic trees. Correlations between the morphological and phylogenetic features are discussed. Illustrations and a detailed description are also provided for the aecia of C. succinea in China for the first time. Keywords: aeciospores, molecular phylogeny, spruce needle rust, taxonomy Introduction Picea asperata Mast.is native to western China, widely distributed in Qinghai, Gansu, Shaanxi and western Sichuan.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of the Alarm Pheromone of Cowpea Aphid, and Comparison with Two Other Aphididae Species
    Journal of Insect Science, (2017) 18(1): 1; 1–4 doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iex097 Research Identification of the Alarm Pheromone of Cowpea Aphid, and Comparison With Two Other Aphididae Species Sandrine Mariella Bayendi Loudit,1,2,3 Antoine Boullis,1 François Verheggen,1 and Frédéric Francis1 1Functional & evolutionary entomology, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium, 2Institut de Recherches Agronomiques et Forestières BP 13260 Libreville, Gabon, and 3Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Subject Editor: Stephen Lapointe Received 17 July 2017; Editorial decision 23 October 2017 Abstract In response to a predator attack, many Aphidinae species release an alarm pheromone, which induces dispersal behavior in other individuals within the colony. The major component of this pheromone is the sesquiterpene (E)- β-farnesene (Eβf), but variations occur between aphid species. In the present work, we collected, identified, and quantified the alarm pheromone ofAphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae), before quantifying the escape behavior induced in the neighboring individuals. We compared the semiochemistry and associated behavior of alarm signaling with two other aphid species: Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Aphis fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Eβf was the only volatile found for each species. M. persicae produces a higher quantity of Eβf (8.39 ± 1.19 ng per individual) than A. craccivora (6.02 ± 0.82 ng per individual) and A. fabae (2.04 ± 0.33 ng per individual). Following exposure to natural doses of synthetic Eβf (50 ng and 500 ng), A. craccivora respond more strongly than the two other Aphidinae species with 78% of the individuals initiated alarm behavior for 500 ng of Eβf.
    [Show full text]
  • Penestragania Apicalis (Osborn & Ball, 1898), Another Invasive
    ©Arbeitskreis Zikaden Mitteleuropas e.V. - download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Cicadina 13 (2013): 5‐15 Penestragania apicalis (Osborn & Ball, 1898), another invasive Nearctic leafhopper found in Europe (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae, Iassinae) Herbert Nickel*, Henry Callot, Eva Knop, Gernot Kunz, Klaus Schrameyer, Peter Sprick, Tabea Turrini‐Biedermann, Sabine Walter Summary: In 2010 the Nearctic leafhopper Penestragania apicalis (Osb. & Ball) was found for the first time in Europe. Altogether there are now 16 known localities in France, Switzerland, Germany and Austria indicating that the species is well es‐ tablished for a rather long period and more widespread in Europe and perhaps worldwide. As in North America it lives on honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L.), overwinters in the egg stage and probably has one or two generations a year, with adults at least from late June until early October. It is yet unclear if it causes relevant damage to the host plant in Europe. Keywords: alien species, neozoa, plant pests, Iassinae, Gleditsia 1. Introduction In 2012 a leafhopper was found in several localities in central Europe that was hitherto unknown to European hemipterists. Extensive search in taxonomic litera‐ ture from all around the world revealed that it was Penestragania apicalis (Osborn & Ball, 1898). This species was originally described from Iowa and Nebraska as a member of the genus Macropsis Lewis, 1834 (see Osborn & Ball 1898a), later placed into Bythoscopus Germar, 1833, Stragania Stål, 1862 (see Metcalf 1966a), and finally Penestragania Beamer & Lawson, 1945. The latter was originally erected as a subge‐ nus only and later raised to genus level by Blocker (1979) who limited the genus Stragania to the type species St.
    [Show full text]
  • Cephalcia Lariciphila
    Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Cephalcia lariciphila IDENTITY Name: Cephalcia lariciphila Wachtl Synonyms: Cephalcia alpina Klug Cephalcia annulata Hartig Lyda alpina Klug Taxonomic position: Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pamphiliidae Common names: European web-spinning larch sawfly (English) Lärchen-Gespinstblattwespe (German) Bayer computer code: CEPCAL EU Annex designation: II/B HOSTS This insect attacks Larix spp., e.g. L. decidua and L. leptolepis. Interspecific hybrids are also attacked. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION EPPO region: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Russia (European, Siberia), Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, UK. EU: Present. BIOLOGY Adults fly in May-June, males often being more common. Eggs are deposited singly on short-shoot needles. Larvae spin a web-tube at the bases of the short shoots and remain in the web while consuming the needles. Most feeding takes place in July. The old larvae drop to the ground where they remain free as eonymphs without a cocoon 5-20 cm below the surface. In September they develop into pronymphs which overwinter. Pupation occurs in spring. Larvae may however remain in the soil as eonymphs for as many as four winters before they pupate (Röhrig, 1953; Pschorn-Walcher, 1982). A development cycle of 1-2 years is normal but, in some places, e.g. the Netherlands, up to 44% of the population was reported to have at least a 3-year generation cycle (Luitjes & Minderman, 1959). During outbreaks, population densities of 57-372 nymphs/m2 of soil were found. DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION Symptoms C. lariciphila cuts the needle at the bases and pulls it into the web where it is eaten.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Chloroplast Genomes Shed Light on Phylogenetic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Complete chloroplast genomes shed light on phylogenetic relationships, divergence time, and biogeography of Allioideae (Amaryllidaceae) Ju Namgung1,4, Hoang Dang Khoa Do1,2,4, Changkyun Kim1, Hyeok Jae Choi3 & Joo‑Hwan Kim1* Allioideae includes economically important bulb crops such as garlic, onion, leeks, and some ornamental plants in Amaryllidaceae. Here, we reported the complete chloroplast genome (cpDNA) sequences of 17 species of Allioideae, fve of Amaryllidoideae, and one of Agapanthoideae. These cpDNA sequences represent 80 protein‑coding, 30 tRNA, and four rRNA genes, and range from 151,808 to 159,998 bp in length. Loss and pseudogenization of multiple genes (i.e., rps2, infA, and rpl22) appear to have occurred multiple times during the evolution of Alloideae. Additionally, eight mutation hotspots, including rps15-ycf1, rps16-trnQ-UUG, petG-trnW-CCA , psbA upstream, rpl32- trnL-UAG , ycf1, rpl22, matK, and ndhF, were identifed in the studied Allium species. Additionally, we present the frst phylogenomic analysis among the four tribes of Allioideae based on 74 cpDNA coding regions of 21 species of Allioideae, fve species of Amaryllidoideae, one species of Agapanthoideae, and fve species representing selected members of Asparagales. Our molecular phylogenomic results strongly support the monophyly of Allioideae, which is sister to Amaryllioideae. Within Allioideae, Tulbaghieae was sister to Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae whereas Allieae was sister to the clade of Tulbaghieae‑ Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae. Molecular dating analyses revealed the crown age of Allioideae in the Eocene (40.1 mya) followed by diferentiation of Allieae in the early Miocene (21.3 mya). The split of Gilliesieae from Leucocoryneae was estimated at 16.5 mya.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Intermountain Region Part 1
    United States Department of Agriculture Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Intermountain Region Part 1 Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-375 April 2018 Halofsky, Jessica E.; Peterson, David L.; Ho, Joanne J.; Little, Natalie, J.; Joyce, Linda A., eds. 2018. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation in the Intermountain Region. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-375. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Part 1. pp. 1–197. Abstract The Intermountain Adaptation Partnership (IAP) identified climate change issues relevant to resource management on Federal lands in Nevada, Utah, southern Idaho, eastern California, and western Wyoming, and developed solutions intended to minimize negative effects of climate change and facilitate transition of diverse ecosystems to a warmer climate. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service scientists, Federal resource managers, and stakeholders collaborated over a 2-year period to conduct a state-of-science climate change vulnerability assessment and develop adaptation options for Federal lands. The vulnerability assessment emphasized key resource areas— water, fisheries, vegetation and disturbance, wildlife, recreation, infrastructure, cultural heritage, and ecosystem services—regarded as the most important for ecosystems and human communities. The earliest and most profound effects of climate change are expected for water resources, the result of declining snowpacks causing higher peak winter
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Insects Calophya Latiforceps
    United States Department of Field Release of the Insects Agriculture Calophya latiforceps Marketing and Regulatory (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) and Programs Pseudophilothrips ichini Animal and Plant Health Inspection (Thysanoptera: Service Phlaeothripidae) for Classical Biological Control of Brazilian Peppertree in the Contiguous United States Environmental Assessment, May 2019 Field Release of the Insects Calophya latiforceps (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) and Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) for Classical Biological Control of Brazilian Peppertree in the Contiguous United States Environmental Assessment, May 2019 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Trees Teacher Self-Guided Tour (SGT) Grades 4-8
    Great Trees Teacher Self-Guided Tour (SGT) Grades 4-8 Welcome! This tour is designed to offer suggestions and structure to your visit. You can go in any order, and please modify and add activities to fit the needs and interests of your class. If your students get excited about a plant, a piece of sculpture, or wildlife outside of the tour – go for it! The Morris Arboretum is a wonderful place with much to see and learn! Some of the activities are easier if written out. Have students bring something to take notes on. Garden Etiquette • The most important rule is RESPECT – respect the trees and other plants, animals, and of course, people. • Students are allowed off the paths, but they should not go into mulched areas. The mulch is there to protect delicate plants and root systems. • Students MAY NOT climb trees. This damages the bark, limbs, leaves, and disturbs creatures living in the trees. • Eat and drink only in designated lunch areas. • There are bathrooms in the garden, noted on the map, as well as in the Visitor Center. • Have fun and learn about the beauty and importance of trees in our environment. Tree Identification On many of the trees, there are copper identification tags embossed with the common name of tree, the scientific name of the tree, its place of origin, and the year it was accessioned (the year it was recorded into the collection – not necessarily the year it was planted.) Find one and show students how to read them. Please DO NOT take these tags off the trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Pando – Colony
    Nature’S MARVELS Pando – Colony Credit: J Zapell of Golden Clones Sonam Choudhary ALL, thin trunks with smooth white bark marked with that possesses same genetic makeup. Pando is the oldest of all black horizontal scars and prominent black knots, Pando clonal colonies on Earth. Tare the most picturesque and graceful trees, distributed Also known as the trembling giant, the grove spread in widely in North America. Pando, meaning ‘I spread’ in Latin, approximately 106 acres of land with a number of 47,000 is the name given to the colony of quaking aspens that look or so trees, really is a single organism. The individual trees like a forest but is actually a single organism. Yes, that is true! are not individuals, but stems of a gigantic single clone. The Scientifically known as Populus tremuloides, it is a clone is truly massive, estimated to weigh collectively about deciduous poplar tree and is one of the several species 6,000,000 kilograms, making it the heaviest known organism commonly referred as aspen. This enormous golden grove is on the planet. All the trees are genetically identical to each located in the Fishlake National Forest of Utah states of United other sharing a single colossal underground root system. The States. Pando is called a clonal colony which occurs in plants, root system of Pando is believed to be 80,000 years old. The fungus and bacteria. A clonal colony is a group of organisms colour of Pando turns brilliant gold when summer shifts into 54 | Science Reporter | June 2018 fall, the best time to see them.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Host Specificity Compared Between Two Populations of The
    Biological Control 65 (2013) 53–62 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Biological Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Efficacy and host specificity compared between two populations of the psyllid Aphalara itadori, candidates for biological control of invasive knotweeds in North America ⇑ Fritzi Grevstad a, , Richard Shaw b, Robert Bourchier c, Paolo Sanguankeo d, Ghislaine Cortat e, Richard C. Reardon f a Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA b CABI, Bakeham Lane, Egham, Surrey TW20 9TY, United Kingdom c Agriculture and AgriFood Canada-Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1 d Olympic Natural Resources Center, University of Washington, Forks, WA 98331, USA e CABI, CH 2800 Delemont, Switzerland f USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA highlights graphical abstract " Two populations of the psyllid Aphalara itadori are effective at reducing knotweed growth and biomass. " The two populations differ in their performance among different knotweed species. " Development of A. itadori occurred infrequently on several non-target plant species. " The psyllid exhibited non-preference and an inability to persist on non- target plants. article info abstract Article history: Invasive knotweeds are large perennial herbs in the Polygonaceae in the genus Fallopia that are native to Received 2 February 2012 Asia and invasive in North America. They include Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed), F. sachalinensis Accepted 4 January 2013 (giant knotweed), and a hybrid species F. x bohemica (Bohemian knotweed). Widespread throughout Available online 12 January 2013 the continent and difficult to control by mechanical or chemical methods, these plants are good targets for classical biological control.
    [Show full text]