DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Project Cover Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Project Cover Sheet “Native Americans in New England” National Endowment for the Humanities Professors Alice Nash and Neal Salisbury, Directors University of Massachusetts July 7 to July 27, 2013 Final Project Cover Sheet Project Title: ___”It’s Complicated”__________________________________________________ Summer Scholars: _____Rachel Baker and Rob Boutilier_____________________________________ Essential question(s) for the unit and/or lesson: -What happened BEFORE the US History I frameworks begin? -How can socio-cultural, political, and economic differences lead to separation, violence, oppression, and racism? -What happens when several different peoples are competing for the same physical space? Learning objectives (skills, content and attitudes) for the lesson: -Students will be able to evaluate how history and bias are represented through historical maps (and begin to question sources). -Students will be able to analyze primary sources to make inferences about historical events and compare and contrast multiple perspectives on the same historical event. -Students will be able to create (the rough draft of) a map that conveys the complex network of several different European communities and several different tribes in Colonial America. -Students will understand that it was not just “the English versus the Indians” in Colonial America, but rather, a complex network of several different European communities and several different tribes interacting, competing, and allying. Overview of lesson: Context: The Massachusetts frameworks for US History I begin with what most textbooks called the “road to the Revolution,” including the French and Indian War, Stamp Act, etc. This means that students have not learned about the Colonial Period since fifth grade! We created this lesson to be part of a Colonial America mini unit which will take place at the beginning of a US History I course. This mini unit will serve as a time for students to build background information, skills, and enduring understandings that will be essential to their success in the rest of the course. Students will begin the unit by reviewing the thirteen English colonies and using primary sources and images to compare and contrast the different regions (culture, geography, economies, etc.). However, it is imperative that students understand that the English were not alone in the land that is now the United States of America, nor was it just the English competing for land with “the Indians.” There was a complex system of tribes that had experienced both friendship and hostility with one another long before Europeans arrived. Similarly, the English were not the only Europeans attempting to “settle” this “new” land. Different European nations competed for land, resources, and for alliances with the very tribes that already inhabited this land. Combine several distinct tribes with competing European powers, and you get quite a complex web of interactions, alliances, trade networks, and even wars. In this lesson, students will not only examine specific illustrations and events which prove the complexity of these interactions and relationships, but they will also compare and contrast sources on the same topics/events and begin to question the validity of any historical source! As this lesson comes so early on in the course, it is a perfect time to introduce the topic of historiography and the idea that there is no one history, no one truth. Students will learn that both history, and the student of history, are quite complicated! Learning Activities: This lesson will take place over the course of two class periods (three for shorter periods) and will center around maps as representations of different perspectives in history. Students will compare and contrast different maps of Colonial America and note their observations of the specific components included in some maps and left off of others (different indigenous tribes, different European colonists, details such as how many tribes are included, etc.). They will work in partners and groups and use specific protocols to compare and contrast primary source images and documents from the Pequot Massacre and the Deerfield Raid. This will enable them to practice primary source analysis, and also (hopefully) develop their own understanding of how complicated the relationships were between several European colonial groups and several distinct tribes. After the analysis, students will participate in a fishbowl discussion (where 4-5 students discuss at once, but new students can “tap in/tap someone out” to join in the conversation) revisiting the big question and the maps. Students will discuss the complicated nature of the relationships/interactions between peoples in Colonial America and will discuss the following questions about the maps: 1) Which map is most true/accurate to what really happened? 2) Which components would you include if producing a “most” accurate map? 3) Why did some maps leave out certain components? Groups will then create a rough draft of a map that includes components of their choice to make the map more “complete” or “accurate” than the maps we viewed at the beginning of class. To hold students personally responsible, they will also individually complete an “exit ticket” or “exit slip,” where they have to explain why they think certain components (ideas/names/locations) were left off of the earlier maps. However, they have to convey the “problem” that causes these things to be left off by writing down the problem in the form of a hashtag (Twitter style - brief and to the point). Historical background (brief content context for fellow teachers): American history classes taught in America (especially in the Northeast) tend to place an emphasis on the “Original 13 colonies.” In Massachusetts, the US History I frameworks begin (chronologically) with the “road to the Revolution.” However, there were other Europeans “settling” this “new” land alongside the English. And of course, there were hundreds of tribes of indigenous peoples who had been living in this “new” land for thousands of years and existed in extremely advanced, civilized communities. Combine the complicated relationships between all of these distinct tribes and the competition for land and resources among European colonizers, and you get quite a web of complex interactions. This lesson is focused on historical maps, the 1637 Pequot Massacre and the 1704 Raid on Deerfield as evidence of these complicated interactions and relationships. Historical Maps: The maps in “category A” will be maps that show the least information – and basically just include the English colonists and a few Indian tribes. The maps in “category B” will be maps that portray some of the other European nations colonizing the space that is now the United States. The maps in “category C” are focused on Native American tribes and where they were located before colonization. Most maps in categories A and B are from around 1750 (for consistency), whereas the maps from category C seem to be based on tribal locations prior to colonization (there was much movement after colonization began). Therefore, the combining of these maps is a bit anachronistic. However, in examining them together, we believe that students may begin to be able to analyze which European groups may have encountered which Native American groups. They will begin to see more of the story of the complex interactions between the Europeans and the “Indians.” Pequot Massacre: Death and destruction in the 1630s among the tribes of what would become Connecticut defy belief. Estimates of 90% casualties among Native Americans from European-borne diseases created tremendous turmoil among various tribes. Trade with Europeans further destabilized the area. Europeans avidly traded metal goods for furs. Besides pots and pans, knives, hatchets, muskets, and ammunition led to essentially 17th century arms race in America. Tribes that were able to obtain weaponry and alliances gained security and economic advantage. Destabilization proceeded at lightening pace. In 1630, Massachusetts Bay colonists arrived along the Connecticut coast and river valley. By 1638, the Pequot tribe largely surrendered. The English, French, Spanish, Portuguese and Dutch competed with each other economically and militarily in large part because they were neighbors. Likewise with the Mohegans, Nipmucs, Narragansetts, and Pequots. Competition for limited resources as well as complicated histories of prior wars and insults infect Europe even today. The tribes of southern New England shared similarly fluid animosity and alliance. As the Dutch and English increasingly competed for territory and trade further pressure and competition occurred among the Indians. The Puritans of Massachusetts Bay, in an attempt to monopolize the fur trade in the area realized that the Pequot were the most powerful tribe and that due to the nature of previous wars and competition that a large alliance with neighboring tribes could be established. In 1636, excuses for an attack on the Pequot appeared with the murders of several Puritan invaders into Pequot territory. The Puritans allied with Nipmuc, Narragansett, and Mohegan tribes against the Pequot. Atrocities occurred on both sides, but the most prominent event was the shooting and burning alive of hundreds of Pequot on May 26, 1637 – an event that is commonly known as the “Mystic Massacre” and was a major factor in the near annihilation of the Pequot tribe. Raid on Deerfield: On February 29, 1704 t French and Indian forces attacked the English
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE MANY STORIES of 1704 NARRATIVE SUMMARY Memorial
    THE MANY STORIES OF 1704 NARRATIVE SUMMARY Memorial Hall Museum, in collaboration with Native and French Canadian cultural organizations, proposes to fully develop an exemplary website, focusing on the Deerfield Attack of 1704, which demonstrates a model approach for museums to depict and voice diverse perspectives of history in a way that is engaging and compelling to the general public. This project will demonstrate an innovative use of technology (both website design and programming tools) that can assist museums in meeting their goal to offer multiple historical perspectives. This website will be widely promoted to public audiences, and will be rigorously evaluated to measure whether desired outcomes have been attained. Technological tools, applications, and products created to support this approach will be extensively disseminated to the museum community to facilitate widespread adoption of this model. A prototype of the proposed site can be viewed at http://www.digitalgizmo.com/pvma/1704/prototype/index.html. BACKGROUND The Deerfield Attack of 1704 was a major battle in Queen Anne’s War, one of the series of wars known collectively as the French and Indian Wars that were fought between France and England, with their Native American allies. On February 29, 1704, the bucolic town of Deerfield, Massachusetts of today was, for one brief, three- hour span, the main stage of violent clashing among European colonial empires, diverse Native American nations, and personal ambitions. The French led 48 French and 200 Abenaki, Pennacook, Kanien’kehaka (Mohawk), and Wendat (Huron) soldiers in an attack, resulting in a decisive victory, with the death or capture of more than half of Deerfield’s 291 residents.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Vermont
    Ill Class ^:_49_ Book XlX_ Copyright]^!' COPyRlGHT DEPOSIT Thomas Chittenden The first governor of Vermont HISTORY OF VERMONT BY EDWARD DAY COLLINS, Ph.D. Formerly Instructor in History in Yale University WITH GEOLOGICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL NOTES, BIBLIOGRAPHY, CHRONOLOGY, MAPS, AND ILLUSTRATIONS BOSTON, U.S.A. GINN &L COMPANY, PUBLISHERS d)e ^tl)ensettm pregg * 1903 THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, Two CoPtcS Received OCT :9 1903 ICLAS8 A-XXc No, UC{ t ^ ^ COPY B. Copyright, 1903, by EDWARD DAY COLLINS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PREFACE The charm of romance surrounds the discovery, explo- ration, and settlement of Vermont. The early records of the state offer an exceptional field for the study of social groups placed in altogether primitive and almost isolated conditions ; while in political organization this commonwealth illustrates the development of a truly organic unity. The state was for fourteen years an independent republic, prosperous and well administered. This book is an attempt to portray the conditions of life in this state since its discovery by white men, and to indicate what the essential features of its social, eco- nomic, and political development have been. It is an attempt, furthermore, to do this in such a way as to furnish those who are placed under legal requirement to give instruction in the history of the state an oppor- tunity to comply with the spirit as well as with the letter of the law. Instruction in state history rests on a perfectly sound pedagogical and historical basis. It only demands that the same facilities be afforded in the way of texts, biblio- graphical aids, and statistical data, as are demanded in any other field of historical work, and that the most approved methods of study and teaching be followed.
    [Show full text]
  • United States History Topic Ideas for NHD Projects
    United States History Topic Ideas for NHD Projects Broad or If you’re interested in… ConsiderConsider………… Common Topic Colonization Exploration and Settlement North Dakota : • Lewis and Clark • Sakakawea • Early Explorers • Settlement of North Dakota • Railroads in North Dakota • Ranching in North Dakota • Early Reservation Era Relationships with Indians • The Sarcoxie Wars – 1837 (MO) Colonial Era • Raid on Deerfield, Massachusetts – 1704 • Louisiana Code Noir – 1724 American Military and Diplomatic Revolution History • General von Steuben at Valley Forge – 1778 (PA) (1775-1783) • George Washington – 1775 (VA) • African-Americans in the Revolution – 1775 U.S. Political Theories and Foundations in English Common Law Constitution Principles • Magna Carta – 1215 • English Bill of Rights - 1689 PrePrePre-Pre ---ConsitutionConsitution • Mayflower Compact – 1620 • Fundamental Orders of Connecticut – 1639 • Connecticut Code of 1650 • Jefferson's Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom - 1786 Constitutional Convention Debates • Three-Fifths Compromise - 1787 • Virginia Plan vs. New Jersey Plan -1787 Andrew Jackson Constitutional Debate • National Bank - 1833 • Nullification Crisis – 1832 (SC) • Trail of Tears – 1830 • Fort Gibson’s Role in the Trail of Tears (OK) Antebellum Debates over Slavery and • David Walker's Appeal for Universal Abolitionism Emancipation – 1829 (MA) • Bleeding Kansas - 1854 • Dred Scott v. Sanford – 1857 (MO) • Charles Redmond and the Massachusetts Anti- Slavery Society – 1857 Civil War Military/War History Tragedies and of War (1861-1865) • Andersonville Prison (GA) • Elmira Prison (NY) • Gettysburg – 1863 (PA) • Civil War surgery North Dakota • Civil War in North Dakota African American Involvement • Camp Nelson (KY) • 54 th Massachusetts Volunteer Regiment • 1st Kansas Colored Infantry Westward Conflict • Mission San Gabriel Native American Revolt – Territories and 1785 (CA) Expansion • The West Florida Revolt – 1810 (LA) • Bloody Monday Riots – 1855 (KY) • George A.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE to the WILLIAMS FAMILY PAPERS Scope and Content Note
    GUIDE TO THE WILLIAMS FAMILY PAPERS Scope and Content Note: The Williams Family Papers, which were received by the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association from many sources over a long period of time, consist of four types of material: (1) approximately 3500 original manuscripts of the 18th and 19th centuries written by or addressed to various descendants of Robert Williams, "cordwayner" of Norwich, England, who came to this country in 1637 and settled in Roxbury, Mass.; (2) reproductions of similar manuscripts elsewhere in Deerfield or in other locations; (3) transcripts of Williams material; and (4) notes and correspondence of George Sheldon and others that relate to the Williams family. The numbers in superscript that follow many of the names in this guide are those assigned by George Sheldon in the Williams genealogy included in the second volume of his History of Deerfield, Massachusetts (1895). Biographical Notes and Description of Manuscripts: Thomas Williams15, a great-great grandson of Robert1, was born in 1736, studied medicine with Dr. Thomas Williams14 in Deerfield, and then settled in Roxbury, Mass. He married Abigail, daughter of Major Elijah Williams,12 in 1760. Thomas died in 1815, his widow in 1818. He is represented by an undated letter from his father-in-law, asking him to bring or arrange to have brought various items from Boston. [See box of reproductions for photocopy of his will, dated 1814.] Ebenezer Hinsdale Williams23, son of Thomas15 was born in 1761. He was a farmer who lived for many years at "Carter's Land." Later he bought several lots on the main village street and lived on Lot 42 from 1816 until his death in 1838.
    [Show full text]
  • Captive Histories: English, French, and Native Narratives of the 1704 Deerfield Raid'
    H-AmIndian Rine on Haefeli and Sweeney, 'Captive Histories: English, French, and Native Narratives of the 1704 Deerfield Raid' Review published on Monday, December 8, 2008 Evan Haefeli, Kevin Sweeney, eds. Captive Histories: English, French, and Native Narratives of the 1704 Deerfield Raid. Native Americans of the Northeast: Culture, History, and the Contemporary Series. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2006. xx + 298 pp. $22.95 (paper), ISBN 978-1-55849-543-2. Reviewed by Holly A. Rine Published on H-AmIndian (December, 2008) Commissioned by Patrick G. Bottiger Other Voices Heard From: Uncovered Histories of 1704 Deerfield Raid In 1707, the first printing of Reverend John Williams’s narrative, The Redeemed Captive Returning to Zion, which recounts his captivity as a result of the 1704 raid on Deerfield, appeared for mass consumption. Since then it has taken its place alongside Mary Rowlandson’s 1682 account of her captivity during Metacom’s War, The Sovereignty and goodness of God, as one of the most famous and widely read colonial captivity narratives. Rowlandson’s and Williams’s accounts have provided centuries of readers with their understanding of the frontier experience in colonial New England, which primarily focused on the religious and political significance of the captivity experience, almost strictly from a puritan perspective. Moreover, Williams’s account has served as the inspiration and centerpiece of scholarly accounts of the 1704 raid as well as collections of captivity narratives.[1] Haefeli and Sweeney have been adding to our understanding of both the Williams narrative and the raid on Deerfield for over a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • A War All Our Own: American Rangers and the Emergence of the American Martial Culture
    A War All Our Own: American Rangers and the Emergence of the American Martial Culture by James Sandy, M.A. A Dissertation In HISTORY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTORATE IN PHILOSOPHY Approved Dr. John R. Milam Chair of Committee Dr. Laura Calkins Dr. Barton Myers Dr. Aliza Wong Mark Sheridan, PhD. Dean of the Graduate School May, 2016 Copyright 2016, James Sandy Texas Tech University, James A. Sandy, May 2016 Acknowledgments This work would not have been possible without the constant encouragement and tutelage of my committee. They provided the inspiration for me to start this project, and guided me along the way as I slowly molded a very raw idea into the finished product here. Dr. Laura Calkins witnessed the birth of this project in my very first graduate class and has assisted me along every step of the way from raw idea to thesis to completed dissertation. Dr. Calkins has been and will continue to be invaluable mentor and friend throughout my career. Dr. Aliza Wong expanded my mind and horizons during a summer session course on Cultural Theory, which inspired a great deal of the theoretical framework of this work. As a co-chair of my committee, Dr. Barton Myers pushed both the project and myself further and harder than anyone else. The vast scope that this work encompasses proved to be my biggest challenge, but has come out as this works’ greatest strength and defining characteristic. I cannot thank Dr. Myers enough for pushing me out of my comfort zone, and for always providing the firmest yet most encouraging feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • The Assimilation of Captives on the American Frontier in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1977 The Assimilation of Captives on the American Frontier in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Joseph Norman Heard Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Heard, Joseph Norman, "The Assimilation of Captives on the American Frontier in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries." (1977). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3157. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3157 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Taken to Detroit': Shawnee Resistance and the Ohio Valley Captive Trade, 1750-1796
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2012 'Taken to Detroit': Shawnee Resistance and the Ohio Valley Captive Trade, 1750-1796 Anna Margaret Cloninger College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Cloninger, Anna Margaret, "'Taken to Detroit': Shawnee Resistance and the Ohio Valley Captive Trade, 1750-1796" (2012). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626689. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-aq1g-yr74 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TAKEN TO DETROIT’: SHAWNEE RESISTANCE AND THE OHIO VALLEY CAPTIVE TRADE, 1750-1796 Anna Margaret Cloninger Richmond, Virginia Bachelor of Arts, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2009 A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History The College of William and Mary January, 2012 APPROVAL PAGE This Thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Anna Margaret CJoninger J , Approved by the Committee, November 2011 Associate Professor Brett Rushforth, History The College of William and Mary ssociate Professor Andrew Fisher, H The College of William and Mary Associate Professor Paul Mapp, History The College of William and Mary ABSTRACT PAGE In the latter half of the eighteenth century, the captive trade was an important element of Shawnee resistance to westward Anglo-American expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Influences on U.S. Government
    1.5 Native American Influences on U.S. Government Standard 1.5: Native American Influences on U.S. Government Analyze the evidence for arguments that the principles of the system of government of the United States were influenced by the governments of Native Peoples. (Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for History and Social Studies) [8.T1.5] As native populations migrated and settled across the vast expanse of North America over time, they developed distinct and increasingly complex societies by adapting to and transforming their diverse environments. [AP U.S. History Key Concept 1.1] The American Revolution’s democratic and republican ideals inspired new experiments with different forms of government. [AP U.S. History Key Concept 3.2] FOCUS QUESTION: Did any Native American Group Influence the Men who Drafted the United States Governing Documents? (TeachingHistory.org., 2018) Building Democracy for All 1 "Massachusetts Bay Colony seal granted by King Charles I in 1629" | Public Domain The seal featured an Indian holding an arrow pointed down in a gesture of peace, and the words "Come over and help us," emphasizing the missionary and commercial intentions of the original colonists The First Americans had lived in North America for 50,000 years before their initial encounters with European explorers and colonists. These indigenous peoples adapted cultures and lifestyles to the geographic and environmental conditions where they lived. You can read a brief Overview of the First Americans from Digital History. The achievements of First American peoples are impressive, but not well-known. Just east of present- day St. Louis, Missouri, the pre-contact First American city of Cahokia had a population of more than 10,000, with at least 20,000 to 30,000 more in outlying towns and farming settlements that spread for fifty miles in every direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 171 H-France Review Vol. 7 (April 2007), No. 41 Evan Haefeli
    H-France Review Volume 7 (2007) Page 171 H-France Review Vol. 7 (April 2007), No. 41 Evan Haefeli and Kevin Sweeney, Eds., Captive Histories: English, French, and Native Narratives of the 1704 Deerfield Raid. Amherst and Boston: University of Massachusetts Press, 2006. xxii + 298 pp. Maps, illustrations, tables, notes, bibliography, and index. $80.00 U.S. (cl). ISBN 1-55849-542-8; $22.95 U.S. (pb). ISBN 1-55849-543-6. Review by Dale Miquelon, University of Saskatchewan. Captive Histories brings us to the margin of H-France’s mandate: just beyond the frontier of a French frontier colony. It is a collection of accounts, many never before published, about the 1704 raid by Canadians and allied Indians against the Massachusetts frontier village of Deerfield. Captivity narratives, the stories of American colonials captured by Indians or by the French of Canada, emerged in the later seventeenth century and became a cornerstone of an emerging American literature, maintaining their popularity well into the nineteenth century. These were stories of Protestantism versus Catholicism, Savagery versus Civilization, or, in the largest terms, Us versus Other. They exemplified a way of seeing the world that spoke to Anglo-Americans of the colonial era and emerging republic. The editors of this welcome collection go beyond the traditional captivity narrative to include other relevant material, some of it from the other side: the reports of the Canadian governor, the governor of Montreal, a French Jesuit, a Canadian officer, and orally-transmitted accounts of Mohawk and Abenakis spokespersons of much later periods. This enlargement beyond New England memoirs and memories adds to the relevance of the volume for students of French colonial history.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Captivity Narratives in Colonial America Kathryn O'hara Gettysburg College Class of 2010
    Volume 8 Article 4 2009 Female Captivity Narratives in Colonial America Kathryn O'Hara Gettysburg College Class of 2010 Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj Part of the American Literature Commons, History Commons, and the Indigenous Studies Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. O'Hara, Kathryn (2009) "Female Captivity Narratives in Colonial America," The Gettysburg Historical Journal: Vol. 8 , Article 4. Available at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj/vol8/iss1/4 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Female Captivity Narratives in Colonial America Abstract The female captivity narrative provides a complex view of colonial American history by recounting the experiences of women captured from their colonial homes by Native Americans. Male editors, often family friends or town ministers, generally compiled the experiences of female captives, and separating the voice of the female captive from influence of the male editor presents a challenge. Puritan captivity narratives in particular demonstrate conflict between attempts by Puritan ministers to impose a unified religious message in the sagas and the captives’ individual experiences, which often contradicted Puritan doctrine. During the early colonial era, ministers’ attempts to promote the Puritan covenant conflicted with the individual salvation testimonies of the female captives. In later narratives, white male editors attempted to impose white cultural values on the female stories, while the captives’ experiences reflected acculturation and integration into Indian society.
    [Show full text]
  • The FCHS NEWSLETTER President Robert S
    The FCHS NEWSLETTER www.frenchcolonial.org President Robert S. DuPlessis Department of History Swarthmore College 500 College Ave Swarthmore, PA 19081-1397 September 2004 Newsletter Tel. 610-328-8131 Fax 610-328-8171 e-mail: [email protected] Welcome back from the summer holidays. This month’s newsletter contains several new Past President A. J. B. (John) Johnston features, including a film review and the Eccles Parks Canada, Atlantic Service Center Prize citation. Also of interest to members is the 1869 Upper Water St., Heggoy Prize citation, a larger than normal section 2nd Floor, Pontac House Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1S9 containing news from colleagues, notices and calls Tel. 902-426-9805 for papers. Fax. 902-426-7012 Next year’s annual meeting organizers are e-mail: [email protected] still seeking proposals. If interested please submit th Vice President your proposal by the September 15 deadline. Greg Waselkov The FCHS Executive Committee voted at Archaeology, HUMB 34 University of South Alabama the recent Washington, DC meeting to raise the Mobile, AL 36688 annual membership rates. Please note that the new Tel. 251-460-6347 rates are now in effect and that membership dues Fax 251-460-6080 e-mail: [email protected] run from annual meeting to annual meeting. The Executive Committee encourages all members to Secretary-Treasurer check their status and ensure that they are up to date William Newbigging with their dues payments. Finally, the Executive Department of History Algoma University College Committee hopes that all members will encourage 1520 Queen Street East their school libraries to subscribe to our journals.
    [Show full text]