DOCSLIB.ORG

International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXIII No 2 2017 ANCIENT GREEK MILITARY THEORY AND PRACTICE. AENEAS TACTICUS (I) Dana DINU University of Craiova, Romania [email protected] Abstract: The intention of this article is to present the oldest surviving work of military art of the Greek antiquity written in the mid-fourth century B.C. by of the author known today as Aeneas Tacticus. In 1609 Isaac Casaubon, its first editor, gave it the Latin title Commentarius de toleranda obsidione, How to Survive under Siege. Aeneas Tacticus was an experienced general on the battlefield, and had an equally solid theoretical training based on treatises of warfare which undoubtedly existed before his own, but were less fortunate and have not reached us. The study of this manual reveals that Aeneas Tacticus wrote or designed to write at least five books on military themes and information exists from other sources that he might have written three more books on the subject. Thus, all these works could have formed a Corpus Aeneanum, comparable in value to Clausewitz's famous work On War. Aeneas's work was highly appreciated and extremely useful for commanders and strategists of the Antiquity and the Middle Ages and was used and cited by all the authors of treatises on siege until the era of pre-modern warfare. Keywords: Aeneas Tacticus, treatise, pre-modern warfare, siege 1. Introduction text were subjected to thorough We owe the discovery and the spreading of examination and were translated in some of this treatise by Aeneas Tacticus to Isaac major modern languages. Casaubon, who published it as a Its value is praised by H. Delbrück, a supplementum to his 1609 edition of historian of warfare art, from different Polybius, Orelli tells us. And it was Orelli perspectives: “The first comprehensive work himself, Aeneas' modern publisher [1], who on military theory, free of any poetic trapping noted that, for more than two centuries after and oriented directly toward practical the editio princeps of this work, the text applications, came from the pen of an remained largely ignored by publishers and Arcadian, the Stymphalian Aeneas, who, critics, notwithstanding Casaubon's very using Xenophon as a source, wrote around scholarly commentary. One of the reasons the year 357 B.C. Only one of the various for this lack of interest in the lapse of time books of this work, that dealing with the between the two editions might be that, at defence of a city, has come down to us, and the moment of the first printed edition, the even it does not give us very much military theory, practice and logistics had information. Most of the book is taken up largely evolved, making the Renaissance with precautionary measures against treason, and post-Renaissance military specialists to stratagems of war, secret writing, telegraphy discard it as obsolete. Since Orelli's and general observations. Nevertheless, the publication in the nineteenth century the book contains but little concerning siege number of new editions, comments and machines and countermeasures for the studies dedicated to this treatise increased, defence, and even this little is possible a later all manuscripts [2] of the original Greek interpolation.” [3]. In addition to its DOI: 10.1515/kbo-2017-0128 © 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. 281 documentary value for the military political and not in the least economic historiography and for the historic field in changes took place, marking the end of the general, this manual is a solid Bronze Age. After the eighth century B.C. complimentary source for studies this led to the birth of independent city- concerning the Ancient Greek mercenary states and, more often than not, to the [4] or the role played by the hoplite troupes inevitable rivalries between them. Later on, in the defence of the city [5], the social the hoplite revolution broke out in cities relations within the city, the social with a democratic constitution, such as conflicts, the relations between citizens and Athens, and brought about an increased role outsiders. At the same time it constitutes a of the common citizens in the city wars. valuable source for specific military terms This will produce a crucial consequence on related to the siege and for the technical the political playground, as Aristotle vocabulary concerning tools of the city demonstrated, namely a greater defence apparatus. participation of the demos in the city governance, hence to democracy. It was 2. Warfare evolution in the Greek world patriotic pride, as well as duty, which made Information about the very early Greek the Greeks into citizens and soldiers. But antiquity, approximately twelfth century never simultaneously, since the citizens B.C., comes down to us from a few were intrinsically landowners and could iconographic materials found in Crete, only serve as active soldiers outside the including information in the linear B (the agricultural season. Consequently the wars oldest attested script form of Greek) about they fought were season-bound. Citizens' the chariot fights. This was the quite solidarity was forged on the battlefield and advanced warfare technology of the this is nowhere more evident than in the Hittites, which later on spread in the whole way the so-called Greek phalanx - the of the Middle East and Egypt and was formidable battle formation - was born, adopted by the Greeks. Of the Bronze Age, with comradeship as an important lubricant the siege of the city of Troy is the best and factor of success. Compared to the wars known and the best documented war. in the archaic period, those which follow Homer is in this, as in so many other are re-dimensioned, as the length and the aspects concerning the antiquity, the first stakes of the confrontations change, with important reference for the Greek warfare different social groups involved and with art and in particular, for siege warfare. It is other interests than in past conflicts. In the from Homer's epic poem that we know that Trojan War for instance, which went on for in Troy the warring Greek elite made use of ten years, several Greek cities formed an battle chariots. But this type of battle, alliance and its outcome was decided by specific for the Bronze Age and for a some ambitious warring aristocrats in specific social and political system of search of the glory brought by individual organization, did not last long with the acts of bravery. In about eight hundred Greeks. The mainland and the Peloponnese years between the Trojan War and the did not have the necessary space for a type middle of the fourth century, the of conflict mainly suited for the plains, approximated moment of the completion of whereas the largely mountainous Greek Aeneas Tacticus' treatise, the Greeks landscape did not favour it. In time, the iron amassed a great deal of experience on the smelting technique enabled the Greeks to battle field. Some of their strategists and manufacture more efficient arms, thus specialists in the art of warfare put this leading to more advances in their warfare experience to use in theoretical materials, approach, at a time when radical social, which led to several practical guides for 282 military confrontations, and more 2.2. Nature of the guidebook specifically, for defence in siege situations. There are many debates regarding the But, except for Xenophon's writings on the relation between the titles given by some cavalry commander and the art of equitation editors and the content of the guidebook, in – though not proper warfare treatises – only other words, to establish which one, one treatise reached us, that of Aeneas, or between the part concerning the tactics and Aeneas Tacticus, as his first editor called that of preparing the city for a siege him. situation, is defining for the nature of this 2.1. Identity of the author of this treatise work. As for Casaubon, he grants the author The question of determining the identity of the epithet of Tacticus, placing him – as author of this treatise is crucial, because Aelianus had before him – [7], among those establishing its authorship with a reasonable who wrote treatises on tactics. degree of certitude also implies a greater On the other hand, some commentators degree of certitude concerning the period of consider that the treatise, or better, its its conception. One thing is beyond doubt, preserved fragment, does not have battle the fact that the author's name is Aeneas tactics as a main topic, therefore the epithet and that it refers to a real person. This Tacticus would be unjustified. identification is mainly owed to Polybius, However one should notice that, by giving also of Arcadian origin, one of the earliest it the Latin title of Commentarius tacticus sources on Aeneas and separated from him et obsidionalis, Casaubon underlines both by approximately two centuries. of the aspects present in the manual, the one Another argument pleading for Aeneas concerning the siege prevaling. In the first seems to be present in the actual text, as if and third chapter, Aeneas writes about the the author introduced his cryptic signature, organisation of the besieged troops and the precisely in chapter 31.18-19 where he idea of tactics becomes evident here. As for speaks about cryptography, even if this Aelianus, when he defines the term of fragment shows gaps and is very difficult to tactics in chap. 3.4, he cites Aeneas as a interpret. The name of Aeneas is not found trusted source for “the science of military in the existing manuscripts, but the text movements”, scientia bellicorum motuum. critics managed to identify the sequence – Many centuries later, the editor Arnold aine- in the altered fragment, thus finding a Hug, gives it the title Commentarius solid argument to support the assumption Poliorceticus, showing the relevance of the that the name of the author is Aeneas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MIDDLEMARCH Adam Roberts Epigraphs and Mirrors A
    MIDDLEMARCH AdAm RobeRts Epigraphs and Mirrors A AdAm RobeRts d A m Using epigraphs as a lens to open up new vistas, this study explores a wide range R of connectons. Moving freely between epigraphs and the main text, Roberts obe succeeds in throwing fresh light on the manifold ‘middleness’ of Middlemarch and the richness and sophistcaton of George Eliot’s realism. R ts John Rignall In Middlemarch, George Eliot draws a character passionately absorbed by abstruse allusion and obscure epigraphs. Casaubon’s obsession is a cautonary tale, but Adam Roberts nonetheless sees in him an invitaton to take Eliot’s use of epigraphy and allusion seriously, and this book is an atempt to do just that. Roberts considers the epigraph as a mirror that refracts the meaning of a text, and that thus carries important resonances for the way Eliot’s novels generate their meanings. In this lively and provoking study, he tracks down those allusions and quotatons that have hitherto gone unidentfed by scholars, examining their MIDDLEMARCH relatonship to the text in which they sit to unfurl a broader argument about the novel – both this novel, and the novel form itself. Middlemarch: Epigraphs and Mirrors is both a study of George Eliot and a meditaton on the textuality of fcton. It is essental reading for specialists and students of George Eliot, the nineteenth century novel, and intertextuality. It will also richly reward anyone who has ever taken pleasure in Middlemarch. This is the author-approved editon of this Open Access ttle. As with all Open Book publicatons, this entre book is available to read for free on the publisher’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Cahiers-Papers 48-2 Final Proof.Indd
    320 Papers of the Bibliographical Society of Canada 48/2 des documents précieux à cause d’une panne de serveur ou d’un virus informatique ? Ne se limitant pas au présent, l’auteur jette un regard curieux et inquiet vers l’avenir rapproché... De plus, le livre est riche, d’une chronologie sélective, d’une riche bibliographie et de l’index. Si vous cherchez une encyclopédie des bibliothèques détruites, ce livre est pour vous. Cette encyclopédie n’est cependant complète, d’abord parce que ces bibliothèques sont trop nombreuses, ensuite parce que chaque année leur liste augmente. EUGÈNE LAKINSKY Bibliothécaire Graham Rees and Maria Wakely. Publishing, Politics, & Culture: The King’s Printers in the Reign of James I and VI. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 280 pp.; £ 55.00 ISBN 9780199576319 “No one who was there will forget his inspiring inaugural lecture, in which he held a room spellbound as he explicated, with wit and energy, the intricate dances of the skeleton formes used to print Francis Bacon’s Novum Organum.” The explication remembered by David Colclough in the Times Higher Education obituary of Graham Rees now forms a part of this splendid monographic study of the Jacobean King’s Printers, the joint achievement of Rees, who died shortly before its publication, and Maria Wakely. The King’s Printing House had a monopoly on the printing of the Bible and the Book of Common Prayer in England, and was also responsible for many other publications, from proclamations to the 1606 English translation of the atlas of Ortelius and the 1620 Instauratio magna – the latter work making a bridge between this book and Rees and Wakely’s contributions (including the editing of the Instauratio magna) to the Oxford Francis Bacon, of which Rees was the director.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SANCTUARY at EPIDAUROS and CULT-BASED NETWORKING in the GREEK WORLD of the FOURTH CENTURY B.C. a Thesis Presented in Partial
    THE SANCTUARY AT EPIDAUROS AND CULT-BASED NETWORKING IN THE GREEK WORLD OF THE FOURTH CENTURY B.C. A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Pamela Makara, B.A. The Ohio State University 1992 Master's Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Timothy Gregory Dr. Jack Ba I cer Dr. Sa u I Corne I I VITA March 13, 1931 Born - Lansing, Michigan 1952 ..... B.A. in Education, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 1952-1956, 1966-Present Teacher, Detroit, Michigan; Rochester, New York; Bowling Green, Ohio 1966-Present ............. University work in Education, Art History, and Ancient Greek and Roman History FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Studies in Ancient Civi I izations: Dr. Timothy Gregory and Dr. Jack Balcer i i TABLE OF CONTENTS VITA i i LIST OF TABLES iv CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 I I. ANCIENT EPIDAUROS AND THE CULT OF ASKLEPIOS 3 I II. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI DECREES 9 IV. EPIDAURIAN THEOROI 21 v. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTIONS 23 VI. AN ARGIVE THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 37 VII. A DELPHIC THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 42 VIII. SUMMARY 47 END NOTES 49 BIBLIOGRAPHY 55 APPENDICES A. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTIONS AND TRANSLATIONS 58 B. ARGIVE THEARODOKO I I NSCR I PT I ON 68 C. DELPHIC THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 69 D. THEARODOKO I I NSCR I PT IONS PARALLELS 86 iii LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Thearodoko i I nscr i pt ions Para I I e Is •••••••••••• 86 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Any evidence of I inkage in the ancient world is valuable because it clarifies the relationships between the various peoples of antiquity and the dealings they had with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture
    ANTONIJE SHKOKLJEV SLAVE NIKOLOVSKI - KATIN PREHISTORY CENTRAL BALKANS CRADLE OF AEGEAN CULTURE Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69
    [Show full text]
  • Minimal Faith and Irenic Ideals in Seventeenth-Century Scholarly Circles Hugo Grotius As a Guardian of Isaac Casaubon’S Legacy*
    Church History Church History and and Religious Culture 94 (2014) 444–478 Religious Culture brill.com/chrc Minimal Faith and Irenic Ideals in Seventeenth-Century Scholarly Circles Hugo Grotius as a Guardian of Isaac Casaubon’s Legacy* Henk Nellen Huygens Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract This article shows how the Dutch humanist Hugo Grotius (1583–1645), inspired by his friend Isaac Casaubon, sought to introduce a procedure for mitigating strife in the Christian church. He proclaimed a division between a set of self-evident, universally accepted key tenets, to be endorsed by all believers, and a larger number of secondary, not completely certain articles of faith, which were to be left open for friendly debate. The doctrine of the Trinity belonged to the second category; it should be treated in a careful, detached way, in words that did not go beyond the terminology of the Bible. However, defenders of this irenic stance laid themselves open to severe criticism: the example of the conservative Lutheran theologian Abraham Calovius illustrates how they were censured for giving up divinely inspired truth for a chimerical unionist ideal which cajoled them into reintroducing the early Christian heresy of Arianism, now called Socinianism. Keywords minimal faith – secularisation – Socinianism – exegesis – seventeenth-century intellectual life – Grotius – Casaubon * Research for this article was conducted within the project ‘Biblical Criticism and Seculariza- tion in the Seventeenth Century’ (nwo, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, 360–25–090). I am indebted to two anonymous reviewers for their remarks on an earlier ver- sion of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Relations with Greece Under Philip and Alexander
    MACEDONIANMACEDONIAN RELATIONRELA TrONSS WITWITHH GREECEGREECE UNDEUNDERR PHILIPHILIPP ANANDD ALEXANDERALEXANDER byby NicholaNicholass SpearSpear ProukouProukou A thesisthesis submittedsubmitted toto thethe facultyfaculty ofof ThThee UniversitUniversityy ooff UtahUtah in partiapartiall fulfillmentfulfillment ofof ththee requirementrequirementss foforr ththee degreedegree of MasteMasterr ofof ArtsArts DepartmentDepartment ofof HistoryHistory ThThee UniversityUniversity ofof UtahUtah AugusAugustt 20092009 CopyrightCopyright © NicholaNicholass SpearSpear ProukoProukouu 20092009 AlAlll RightRightss ReservedReserved THE UNJVERSJTY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Nicholas Spear Proukou This thesis has been read by each member of the following supervisory committee and by majority vote has been found to be satisfactory. Randall O. Stewart· THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL FINAL READING APPROVAL To the Graduate Council of the University of Utah: I have read the dissertation of Nicholas Spear Proukou in its final form and have found that (1) its format, citations, and bibliographic style are consistent and acceptable; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables, and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the supervisory committee and is ready for submission to The GraduateSchool. '2go9 ff�(/' a!�2� Date Winthrop 1. Adams Chair: Supervisory Committee Approved for the MajorDepartment ��eLL1, JamesR. Lehning 3 ChairlDean Approved for the Graduate Council
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizing George Eliot: the Writer As Artist, Intellectual, Proto-Modernist, Cultural Critic
    Newton, K.M. "Prototypes and Symbolism in Middlemarch." Modernizing George Eliot: The Writer as Artist, Intellectual, Proto-Modernist, Cultural Critic. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2010. 69–78. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 28 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781849665155.ch-005>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 28 September 2021, 01:32 UTC. Copyright © K.M. Newton 2011. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 5 Prototypes and Symbolism in Middlemarch he question of prototypes for characters in George Eliot’s fi ction has Talways been a subject of interest. The publication of Richard Ellmann’s essay ‘Dorothea’s Husbands’ in the Times Literary Supplement in 1973 1 provoked a long-running correspondence in its letters page. This correspondence refl ected the assumption that one should look to real people personally known to her for prototypes of her characters.2 But though Middlemarch is undoubtedly in certain respects a novel with some strongly personal aspects, it is also concerned with wider issues. To consider the question of prototypes only in relation to people she knew personally limits the novel’s scope since it does not suffi ciently acknowledge that Eliot is both artist and intellectual and that for her the two are not separable. I shall suggest that historical fi gures were a more signifi cant infl uence on Eliot’s characterization in artistic terms than people she knew and that this can offer insight into some of the cultural issues the novel is concerned with.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Miles Smith, Ed., the Workes of the Right Reverend Father in God Gervase Babington, Late Bishop of Worcester (London, 1592), A3v
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository Miles Smith (1552/53-1624) and the Uses of Oriental Learning Item I doe give vnto the Librarie of Hereford these Bookes followinge, The Venice Byble conteyninge the Targumim and the Rabbins in fower Volumes bounde in white Leather Maimonides in fower Volumes. Kimhi his Miklol (That is to saye) his Grammar in Hebrewe & his Dictionarie in Hebrewe. Kimhi vppon the Psalmes Elias Levita his Meturgemam. The Byble in Hebrew in 4 Volumes in 40 guylded leaves, & Stephanus print Raphalingus Arabick Dictionarie. Erpenius Arabick Grammar. Arabick Newe Testament and 5. Bookes of Moses Arabick Lexicon Talmudicum and the Hebrewe Concordance.1 On 7 March 1624, the bishop of Gloucester, Miles Smith, made his will. 2 In it, he left twenty volumes of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Arabic books to the library of Hereford Cathedral. Smith had been born in Hereford, he became a prebend there in 1580, and his career was closely associated with that of another Hereford Cathedral prebend, Gervase Babington (1549/50-1610). His time at Gloucester seems to have been difficult and controversial, and it is striking he chose to leave his books to the library at Hereford, where he was born, rather than Gloucester, where he was a bishop. Smith does not seem to have been unique in his desire to improve libraries’ holdings of oriental books: Richard Kilbye (1560-1620), for instance, left his collection of Hebrew books to the library of Lincoln College,
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Calixtus and the Humanist Tradition
    Georg Calixtus and the Humanist Tradition Christian Thorsten Callisen Diploma of Financial Services (Financial Planning) Finsia Postgraduate Certificate in Business USQ Research Students Centre Division of Research & Commercialisation Queensland University of Technology Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Research) 2010 i Keywords Georg Calixtus (1586–1656); Isaac Casaubon (1559–1614); humanism; ars historica; consensus antiquitatis; calixtine theology; irenicism; Renaissance; history of ideas; early modern Europe ii Abstract Georg Calixtus (1586–1656) was a Lutheran theologian, prominent in the German lands during the first half of the seventeenth century. Existing research focuses on Calixtus‘ contributions to religious and theological debates, particularly in regard to his role in the Syncretistic Controversy of the latter half of the seventeenth century, and in regard to his unique position as a Lutheran who aspired to reunion between the different Christian confessions. This thesis problematises this focus on Calixtus by theologians and ecclesiastical historians, and argues that the genesis and transmission of his ideas cannot be fully appreciated without considering his relationship with the broader intellectual milieu of early modern Europe. It does this by exploring Calixtus‘ interaction with the humanist tradition, in particular by reconsidering his relationship with Isaac Casaubon (1559–1614), and by exploring his work in light of intellectual movements that were taking place outside the Christian church. In so doing, this thesis argues that Calixtus made contributions to early modern thought that have been overlooked in the existing literature. It also becomes apparent that much research remains to be done to gain a more accurate picture of his place in the early modern intellectual landscape, and of his legacy to later generations of scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Revising the King James Apocrypha
    University of Birmingham Revising the King James Apocrypha Hardy, Nicholas DOI: 10.1163/9789004359055_009 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Hardy, N 2018, Revising the King James Apocrypha: John Bois, Isaac Casaubon, and the Case of 1 Esdras. in M Feingold (ed.), Labourers in the Vineyard of the Lord: Scholarship and the Making of the King James Version of the Bible. Scientific and Learned Cultures and Their Institutions, Brill, Leiden, pp. 266-327. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004359055_009 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: The institute employing the author may post the post-refereed, but pre-print version of that article as appearing in multi-authored books free of charge on its website. Policy see http://www.brill.com/resources/authors/publishing-books-brill/self-archiving-rights General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
    [Show full text]
  • BRUCE LAFORSE, Praising Agesilaus: the Limits of Panhellenic
    Praising Agesilaus: the Limits of Panhellenic Rhetoric Bruce Laforse Shortly after the death of the Spartan king Agesilaus c. 360, Xenophon wrote an encomium of his old friend and patron. As one of the two kings in the unique Spartan dual kingship, Agesilaus had played a crucial role from 400 to 360 BC, a period which saw Sparta both rise to the pinnacle of power and then collapse. The Agesilaus is one of the earliest surviving examples of a prose work written in praise of an historical figure.1 In such an encomium the object was not to present a strictly accurate portrait of the subject; rather it was to praise his character, glorify his achievements and, on the other hand, to anticipate or defend against any potential detractors.2 Omission, exaggeration and bending of the truth were not only allowed but, indeed, expected. Its purpose, therefore, was far different from that of a modern biography; nor, despite the idealization of the subject’s character, did it attempt primarily to uplift and instruct, as did Plutarch’s later moralizing biographies, by presenting positive and negative models to emulate or avoid.3 It was designed to praise, to put the best possible face on the subject’s life, career, background and character.4 It is not, then, strictly speaking, a work of history, and thus scholars must exercise caution when using it as an historical source.5 Supplying conclusive proof that Xenophon himself regarded the purpose of the Agesilaus as fundamentally different from history is the fact that he wrote a much fuller and (comparatively) more balanced account of Agesilaus’ career in the Hellenica, his history of the years 411 to 362.6 The two works date to the same period, and share, with very minor alterations, a number of passages.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Atlantis Related to the Green Sahara?
    International Journal of Hydrology Review Article Open Access Is Atlantis related to the green Sahara? Abstract Volume 5 Issue 3 - 2021 Most scholars take Atlantis as Plato’s invention to promote his political ideal articulated Hong-Quan ZHANG in his masterwork The Republic. This paper points out that the green Sahara period Williams Chair Professor of McDougall School of Petroleum encompasses the time of Atlantis according to Plato’s records. The transitions between the Engineering, The University of Tulsa, USA green Sahara and desert Sahara were controlled by the water cycle stability in the Atlas Basin, an area fitting all the features of the Atlas Empire as described in Plato’sTimaeus and Correspondence: Hong-Quan ZHANG, Williams Chair Critias. The historical account of Atlantis by Plato is compared with the newly identified Professor of McDougall School of Petroleum Engineering, The site, the timelines of climate changes, a likely hydrological process, and the geographical University of Tulsa, OK, USA, Email profiles in the Atlas Basin. Received: May 26, 2021 | Published: June 18, 2021 Keywords: green Sahara, Atlantis, Plato, water cycle stability, rain shadow effect, Atlas Basin, Atlas Empire, inundation Abbreviations: AB, Atlas Basin; BP, calendar year before 1950 so many similarities between Egypt and Atlantis as portrayed by AD; E, evapotranspiration; GDEM, global digital elevation model; Plato that Egyptologist Griffiths6 believed that Plato invented the GSP, green Sahara period; ka, 1000 calendar years; km, kilometer; Atlantis
    [Show full text]