DOCSLIB.ORG

Library and Archive Collaboration for Digital Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Library and Archive Collaboration for Digital Projects Collaborative Librarianship Volume 12 Issue 1 Article 7 6-7-2020 Context is Key: Library and Archive Collaboration for Digital Projects Joy M. Perrin Texas Tech University, [email protected] Robert G. Weaver Southwest Collection/Special Collections Library, Texas Tech University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Perrin, Joy M. and Weaver, Robert G. (2020) "Context is Key: Library and Archive Collaboration for Digital Projects," Collaborative Librarianship: Vol. 12 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol12/iss1/7 This Peer Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Collaborative Librarianship by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Perrin & Weaver: Context is Key Peer Reviewed Article Context is Key: Library and Archive Collaboration for Digital Projects Joy M. Perrin ([email protected]) Associate Librarian, Library Technology Management and Services, University Library, Texas Tech University Robert G. Weaver ([email protected]) Assistant Archivist, Southwest Collection/Special Collections Library, University Library, Texas Tech University Abstract Libraries and archives have different underlying philosophies towards items, metadata, goals, and core processes in their respective fields. With the proliferation of digital libraries and digitization efforts, both kinds of organizations can benefit from working together for the benefit of patrons and researchers. Pre- sented in this article is a case study of a collaboration between the Texas Tech University Libraries Digital Resources Unit (DRU) and the Southwest Collection/Special Collections Library (SWC), an archive of cultural heritage materials. Keywords: archives, digital libraries, digitization, digital collections Introduction basic projects. This article is a case study de- scribing how even though archives and libraries’ This article is about working together despite foundational vocabulary surrounding digital competing priorities and vocabularies. As archi- items, metadata, and collections differs, and vist David Gracy II pointed out in 2006, the “In- even though the two groups’ fundamental ap- formation Age has . [united] the institutions proach to digital project goals and core pro- and services of libraries and librarians, archives cesses are often disparate, both kinds of organi- and archivists, museums and museum profes- zations can find common ground. There are tre- sionals, and preservation administrators and mendous benefits in initially attempting to – or conservators in the fundamental enterprise of even doubling back midstream to – realign un- 1 stewardship of our shared cultural record.” Yet derstanding of these factors during the creation while galleries, libraries, archives, and museums of digital archival collections. Doing so benefits – often bundled together under the acronym not only the organizational partnership, but also "GLAM" – share a mission, they work towards it the discoverability and access experience of pa- in distinct contexts, each with their unique trons. This is the story of collaboration between goals, cultures, and standards. This can cause the Texas Tech University (TTU) Libraries Digi- wildly different understanding of even the most tal Resources Unit (DRU) and TTU’s Southwest Collaborative Librarianship 12(1): 68-79 (2019) 68 Perrin & Weaver: Context is Key Collection/Special Collections Library (SWC), and patron needs; and attempts at conceptual an archive of cultural heritage materials, and the cross-education. rocky road to their mutual success. Harvard had been thinking along similar lines. Literature Review In 1998 a team of archivists, funded by CLIR, published a comprehensive series of questions The nature of collaboration on digital projects and criteria for selecting digital materials in Se- involving both libraries and archives is a dec- lecting Research Collections for Digitization.5 Em- ades-old conversation in constant evolution. phasizing patron utility and demand, project Strategies have been proposed and pursued, les- cost, copyright ramifications, and other adminis- sons learned, then forgotten or miscommuni- trative considerations, it provided tools to help cated, rediscovered, proposed again, and re- librarians and archivists alike share their collec- learned. No single multi-institutional report or tions digitally in a patron- and resource-con- case study has halted this pendulum, as will be scious manner. Kristin Brancolini applied this shown in the following literature review, but the Harvard model to the University of Indiana’s case study of Texas Tech’s archivists and librari- Hohenberger Photograph Collection. It worked ans presented in this article propels the ongoing to her satisfaction, proving to her that there discussion forward via its own unique insights. were objective means to ascertain digital poten- tial among an archive’s holdings.6 In 1998 An- Early publications show an understanding of the drew Hampson independently devised a series core concepts underlying archival-library collab- of questions similar to the Harvard model, but oration. In 1998 The Library of Congress (LOC) emphasized cost-benefit analysis, and even elucidated the benefits of a national digital li- more so the digital projects’ copyright implica- brary, stating, “Academics, educators, and li- tions.7 brarians [agreed] about the rationale” for a sys- tem of widespread electronic access to the col- At that time, librarians and archivists were 2 lections of cultural heritage institutions. The So- thinking about the big picture. Yet despite these ciety of American Archivists had seen the inevi- examples, much of the literature produced in the table advent of digital collections the year be- two succeeding decades deplored a gap between fore, emphasizing foundational archival princi- archivists and librarians’ understanding of digi- ples such as maintaining the sanctity of copy- tal collections. Where had the tenets established 3 right. A year later, the Council on Library and in these early years gone? Perhaps librarians and Information Resources (CLIR) articulated ar- archivists had begun to emphasize the trees over chival analog and digital collections’ possession the forest. For example, zeroing in on copyright of a “logical coherence that binds the contents and cost-benefit became normalized. Copyright together” and “a totality that enhances the re- challenges were Sarah Hamid’s primary focus in search value of each individual item beyond her 1998 exploration of the challenges of digital 4 what it would have in isolation.” Context, they collection creation, noting copyright’s inextrica- argued, is essential to a patron-focused digital ble affect on the already subjectively problem- collection. Librarians should internalize that atic process of selection.8 Peter Astle and concept while archivists should, in turn, con- Adrienne Muir also observed that selection of tinue to emphasize it and its unique vocabulary. materials was “driven primarily by copyright re- The building blocks for librarian-archivist col- strictions rather than user demand” in the laboration were in place: a desire to create the United Kingdom’s public libraries, but, in the content; a nascent understanding of institutional vein of Andrew Hampson, also weighted heav- ily the cost-benefit approach to digitization.9 In Collaborative Librarianship 12(1): 68-79 (2019) 69 Perrin & Weaver: Context is Key 2008 Alexandra Yarrow, Barbara Clubb, and Jen- 2004 that librarians, archivists and, for good nifer-Lynn Draper, in a plea for greater collabo- measure, museum professionals, have “different ration between libraries and archives, focused organisational [sic] cultures, and lack a common on fiscal and temporal cost, the sharing of re- language,” they “talk at cross-purposes” despite sources, and the benefits of raising the visibility “common goals and visions.” Collaboration is of collaborating institutions.10 If such collabora- absolutely possible, she believed, but even sim- tion was present, their other criteria were taking ple concepts, such as the way they describe their widespread rhetorical precedence. Even massive metadata schema, sometimes proved a major consortial projects, such as a 2011 search by a hindrance.13 Take for example Jane Hutton’s large roster of Minnesota archives for a shared 2008 argument that while libraries directed re- digital asset management platform (DAM), em- sources toward creating digital access points for phasized administrative-level budgetary and in- their own online collections, they would be best tellectual property protection. Although authors served to capitalize on their resources by “[pur- Dora Wagner and Kent Gerber’s work here was suing] metadata standards to support cross- a valuable examination of numerous high-level searching, collaborative projects, and develop- case studies, one is left wondering what the ment of e-resource search software which inte- boots-on-the-ground, collaborative experience grates with the library catalog.”14 This is an ex- entailed.11 Were fiscal management, abundant cellent suggestion, and one widely implemented selection tools, and ever-improving technology in the ensuing decade. Yet she was not writing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation
    International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions IFLA Professional Reports, No. 108 108 Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation Alexandra Yarrow, Barbara Clubb and Jennifer-Lynn Draper for the Public Libraries Section Standing Committee Copyright 2008 International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation / Alexandra Yarrow, Barbara Clubb and Jennifer-Lynn Draper. The Hague, IFLA Headquarters, 2008. – 50p. 30 cm. – (IFLA Professional Reports: 108) ISBN 978-90-77897-28-7 ISSN 0168-1931 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Introduction: Why Collaborate and Cooperate? 5 Project Proposal 6 Research Methods 7 Literature Review 8 Collaborative Programming Community and Heritage Programs 10 Museum/Art Pass Programs 13 Collaborative Electronic Resources Global Initiatives 16 Continental Initiatives 16 National Initiatives 17 Regional and Local Initiatives 20 Joint-use/Integrated Facilities Minimal Integration 25 Selective Integration 27 Full Integration 28 Guide to Collaboration Best Practices 31 A Successful Collaboration, from Start to Finish 32 Creating Collaborative Electronic Resources: Special Considerations 34 Benefits and Risks of Collaboration 35 Risk Management Strategies 36 Conclusion 37 Contributors 38 Acknowledgements 39 Works Consulted 41 1 Executive Summary This report examines the recent trends in collaboration and cooperation between public libraries, archives and museums. In many cases, the shared or similar missions of the institutions reviewed make them ideal partners in collaborative ventures. Different types of collaborative projects are examined, including exhibits, community programs, digital resources and joint-use facilities. Examples come from Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom (UK), as well as from Russia, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Spain, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Archival Selection Criteria
    Edinburgh University Library EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES Archival Selection Criteria General Background This document provides some basic guidance on how to identify records holding potential archival value. As mentioned in section 4d of “Developing a retention schedule” you must decide whether any of your records have long-term research value for historical or other purposes. If so, and if the University Archivist agrees, the records can be designated part of the University’s official archives. Much of the guidance contained in “Developing a Retention Schedule” is also relevant to the archival selection process. Discovering what records you have, identifying duplicated or related records, determining legal requirements and deciding how long to keep the records may already have isolated the core of potential archives from your area of work. By applying some basic archival selection criteria you should be able to define the archive still more clearly, either by reducing or adding to your list of what may need to be preserved permanently as the unique archives of the University. Aims Probably less than five per cent of records generated by the University need to be preserved permanently as archives. The archival process therefore aims to preserve only a small selection of records. These will reflect and provide the essential evidence of the University’s most significant functions and activities, and will also serve legitimate research needs either on the part of the University itself or the wider academic and public user community. The surviving archives should show what the University has done and why, how it was organised and operated, and its effect on the wider community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Archival and Manuscript Research in the Investigation of Translator Decision-Making
    This is a repository copy of The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/84758/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Munday, J (2013) The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making. Target, 25 (1). 125 - 139. ISSN 0924-1884 https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.10mun Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making Jeremy Munday, University of Leeds, UK Abstract This paper discusses the application of research methodologies from history and literary studies to the analysis of the translation process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discursive Construction of Archival Science: Conceptual Foundations of a Discipline in Construction
    Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros and João Batista Ernesto de Moraes. 2011. The discursive construction of archival science: Conceptual foundations. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 3. Toronto, Canada, pp. 196-206. Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros ([email protected]) and João Batista Ernesto de Moraes ([email protected]) Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília SP Brazil The Discursive Construction of Archival Science: Conceptual Foundations of a Discipline in Construction Abstract: This work outlines a theoretical background established in Archival Science based mainly on discourse analysis as a key discipline to understand which the differences are and points of concep- tual commonality in the area. Uses the French Discourse Analysis as a principle with a theoretical and methodological framework to typify the archive as a discursive practice defined by their historical aspects of its institutional junctures. The study of discourse helps to understand how certain linguistic formations construct the discourse, concerned mainly with the context in which the text was pro- duced. This analysis take place from manuals and treatises of Archival Science produced during the development of discipline and regarded as grounds for discipline. We analyzed the Manual of an Arc- hival Arrangement and Description (vor Handleiding van het ordenen in bescheijven archieven) of Muller, Feith, and Fruin (Ed.1 1898). Another work considered is the Manual of Archive Administra- tion Including the Problems of War Archives and Archive a Making (1 Ed. 1922) and some of late works of Sir Hillary Jenkinson and finally analyzed the work of Theodore R. Schellenberg some as- pects of his vast bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Palau
    REPUBLIC OF PALAU Palau Public Library Five-Year State Plan 2020-2022 For submission to the Institute of Museum and Library Services Submitted by: Palau Public Library Ministry of Education Republic of Palau 96940 April 22, 2019 Palau Five-Year Plan 1 2020-2022 MISSION The Palau Public Library is to serve as a gateway for lifelong learning and easy access to a wide range of information resources and to ensure the residents of Palau will be successful, literate and resourceful in the Palauan society and the world. PALAU PUBLIC LIBRARY BACKGROUND The Palau Public Library (PPL), was established in 1964, comes under the Ministry of Education. It is the only public library in the Republic of Palau, with collections totaling more than 20,000. The library has three full-time staff, the Librarian, the Library Assistant, and the Library Aide/Bookmobile Operator. The mission of the PPL is to serve as a gateway to lifelong learning and easy access to a wide range of information resources to ensure the residents of Palau will be successful, literate, and resourceful in the Palauan society and world. The PPL strives to provide access to materials, information resources, and services for community residents of all ages for professional and personal development, enjoyment, and educational needs. In addition, the library provides access to EBSCOHost databases and links to open access sources of scholarly information. It seeks to promote easy access to a wide range of resources and information and to create activities and programs for all residents of Palau. The PPL serves as the library for Palau High School, the only public high school in the Republic of Palau.
    [Show full text]
  • Blair 2007 Archival Science Intro Milligan.Pdf (131.1
    Introduction The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Blair, Ann, and Jennifer Milligan. 2007. “Introduction.” Archival Science 7 (4) (December): 289–296. doi:10.1007/s10502-008-9069-7. Published Version 10.1007/s10502-008-9069-7 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:29674917 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA manuscript for Ann Blair and Jennifer Milligan, "Introduction," Archival Science 7:4 (2007), pp. 289-96. Introduction Archives -- collections of paper, books, and other substrates of information (some might say “memory”) and the institutions that house and manage these objects -- are subjects of a renewed and vital current critical historical interest. Archives, broadly conceived, have been used for the writing of history since historical writing began, and archival materials and institutions are an integral part of the making not just of history but of the modern historical profession as well. The historian’s relationship with the archive has been long and varied and described in a broad range of terms, as being as unproblematic as “bread and butter” (Giles 1996) or as driven by erotic, fetishistic desire (Smith 1998). It is fitting that historians should turn their scholarly attentions to these depositories that have been the object, if not the subject, of so much historical work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science Library Catalog: a Springboard for Information Literacy
    The Science Library Catalog: A Springboard for Information Literacy SLMQ Volume 24, Number 2, Winter 1996 Virginia A. Walter, Christine L. Borgman, and Sandra G. Hirsh, Department of Library and Information Science, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles. The world of electronic information is increasingly important, and opening that world to children is a critical part of the library media specialist’s job. That task would be much easier, of course, if electronic information resources were more “child-friendly.” A number of researchers in our field are tackling design issues related to children’s use of these resources, and the creators of the Science Library Catalog (SLC) are pioneers in this effort. Led by Christine Borgman, this research team has been designing successive versions of the SLC and using them as a platform for longitudinal research for almost a decade. In this column, the team summarizes its experiences to date. The column outlines the cognitive theories that have informed the SLC’s ongoing design; describes the catalog itself; explains the continuing research effort based on the SLC; and discusses the research results-emphasizing the findings that are most relevant to school library media specialists as they seek to develop children’s information skills. References to others’ work-including Paul Solomon’s fall 1994 “Current Research” column-suggest the expanding research base that is beginning to establish design criteria for electronic information resources for children.
    [Show full text]
  • Positioning Library and Information Science Graduate Programs for 21St Century Practice
    Positioning Library and Information Science Graduate Programs for 21st Century Practice Forum Report November 2017, Columbia, SC Compiled and edited by: Ashley E. Sands, Sandra Toro, Teri DeVoe, and Sarah Fuller (Institute of Museum and Library Services), with Christine Wolff-Eisenberg (Ithaka S+R) Suggested citation: Sands, A.E., Toro, S., DeVoe, T., Fuller, S., and Wolff-Eisenberg, C. (2018). Positioning Library and Information Science Graduate Programs for 21st Century Practice. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Museum and Library Services. Institute of Museum and Library Services 955 L’Enfant Plaza North, SW Suite 4000 Washington, DC 20024 June 2018 This publication is available online at www.imls.gov Positioning Library and Information Science Graduate Programs for 21st Century Practice | Forum Report II Table of Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Panels & Discussion ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Session I: Diversity in the Library Profession ....................................................................................... 3 Defining metrics and gathering data ............................................................................................... 4 Building professional networks through cohorts ........................................................................ 4
    [Show full text]
  • ARL Cataloger Librarian Roles and Responsibilities Now and in the Future Jeanne M
    Collections and Technical Services Publications and Collections and Technical Services Papers 2014 ARL Cataloger Librarian Roles and Responsibilities Now and In the Future Jeanne M. K. Boydston Iowa State University, [email protected] Joan M. Leysen Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/libcat_pubs Part of the Cataloging and Metadata Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ libcat_pubs/59. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Collections and Technical Services at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Collections and Technical Services Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARL Cataloger Librarian Roles and Responsibilities Now and In the Future Abstract This article details the results of a 2011 study of cataloger librarians’ changing roles and responsibilities at academic Association of Research Libraries. The tudys participants, cataloging department heads, report that cataloger librarian roles are expanding to include cataloging more electronic resources and local hidden collections in addition to print materials. They ra e also creating non-MARC metadata. The increased usage of vendor products and services is also affecting the roles of cataloger librarians at some institutions. The ra ticle explores what skills cataloger librarians will need in the future and how libraries are providing training for that future.
    [Show full text]
  • Yakima Valley Libraries Archive Librarian II FLSA: Non-Exempt ______
    FINAL Yakima Valley Libraries Archive Librarian II FLSA: Non-Exempt ___________________________________________________________________________ Job Purpose and Summary Performs professional level librarian duties throughout Yakima Valley Libraries including: Coordinate and maintain special collections and preserve collection materials. Will uphold the concept of Intellectual Freedom, based on the First and Fourth amendments to the US Constitution, which affords all library users the right to seek and receive information on the subject of one’s interest without examination or scrutiny by others. Supervision Received and Exercised Reports to Public Library Services Director. May receive general supervision from assigned management staff. Essential Duties and Responsibilities The following duties are not intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position-specific duties. 1. Welcomes and serves patrons of the library using high quality customer service practices. This includes: greets customers sincerely, speaks in a friendly manner, welcomes and serves customers without regard to race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, perceived or real disability, age, ancestry, or other characteristics; acknowledges customer’s presence as soon as possible, even if occupied; does not communicate any value judgment when interacting with customers, and verifies that customer’s needs are met. 2. Coordinates and conducts a variety of professional library work for area of assignment. 3. Organizes and maintains the Library’s historical collections and converts to district wide resources. 4. Ensures the proper maintenance of specialized collection materials including books, maps, directories, periodicals, government documents, and archival materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Library Association MLA '18 Poster Abstracts
    Medical Library Association MLA ’18 Poster Abstracts Abstracts for the poster sessions are reviewed by members of the Medical Library Association National Program Committee (NPC), and designated NPC members make the final selection of posters to be presented at the annual meeting. 1 Poster Number: 1 Time: Tuesday, May 22, 1:00 PM – 1:55 PM Bringing Each Other into the FOLD: Shared Experiences in Start-up Osteopathic Medical School Libraries Darell Schmick, AHIP, Director of Library Services, University of the Incarnate Word, School of Osteopathic Medicine Library, San Antonio, TX; Elizabeth Wright, Director of Library Services, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Arkansas Colleges of Health Education, Library, Fort Smith, AR; Erin Palazzolo, Library Director and Professor of Medical Informatics, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine at New Mexico State University, BCOM Library, Las Cruces, NM; Norice Lee, Assoc. Library Director & Assoc. Prof. / Medical Informatics, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine Health Sciences Library, Las Cruces, NM; Molly Montgomery, Director of Library Services, Proposed Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, Library, Meridian, ID; Anna Yang, AHIP, Health Sciences Librarian, California Health Sciences University, Library, Clovis, CA Objectives: To establish a communication channel for founding library administrators of new medical schools. Methods: Library directors in founding osteopathic medical schools are faced with a unique set of challenges in this role. Depending on the establishing medical school’s structure, these can be librarians in a solo capacity. Librarians in this role share experiences and best practices over a monthly meeting for their inaugural and second academic school years, respectively. Results: Meetings enjoyed robust discussion and comparison of resources.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LIBRARY Coordinator of Library Services 276.964.7266 [email protected]
    CONNECTIONS Dr. Teresa A. Yearout, Librarian THE LIBRARY Coordinator of Library Services 276.964.7266 www.sw.edu/library [email protected] Diane Phillips, Librarian IMPORTANT NUMBERS Reference and Instruction AT A GLANCE 276.964.7617 [email protected] Circulation / Renewals: 276.964.7265 Terri Kiser Cataloging & Acquisitions Reference / Instruction: 276.964.7738 276.964.7617 [email protected] Evening Services: Debbie Davis 276.964.7265 Circulation & Interlibrary Loan 276.964.7265 Interlibrary Loan: [email protected] 276.964.7265 Nancy Bonney Coordinator of Circulation Library Services: 276.964.7265 276.964.7266 [email protected] Acquisitions: David Butcher 276.964.7630 Circulation 276.964.7265 Cataloging: [email protected] 2017-2018 276.964.7738 Rev. 2/2017 Library Handbook for Students Southwest Virginia Community College P.O. Box SVCC Southwest Virginia Richlands, VA 24641 Community College (800) 822-7822 or (276) 964-7235 V/TDD P.O. Box SVCC http://www.sw.edu Richlands, VA 24641-1101 EOE/AA Pare información en español, Ilame Ud. (276) 964-7751. Pour des renseignements en français, appelez (276) 964–7751. My EMPL ID: APA STYLE (patterns and examples) HOW TO CITE ONLINE ARTICLES & E-BOOKS My SWCC email address: My SWCC username (for Library, Black- Warning: Citation style for online sources is continually evolving. Consult your instructor in choosing the appropriate style and for further guidance. board, SWCC email & Student Information ***************************************************************************** Magazine Article Pattern for APA style: System): [Author last name], [First initial]. [Middle initial]. ([Year], [Month and day]). [Title of article]. [Title of magazine], [Volume number]([Issue number]), [Inclusive page numbers].
    [Show full text]