34TH & BWY, New York, NY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

34TH & BWY, New York, NY THE RETAIL AT HERALD SQUARE COMPLETE THE SQUARE 34TH & BWY | THE RETAIL AT HERALD SQUARE IS THE MOST PROMINENT LOCATION IN ONE OF THE MOST HIGH-TRAFFIC, HIGH-VISIBILITY, HIGH-VOLUME RETAIL INTERSECTIONS ANYWHERE. THE WORLD’S LARGEST H&M, THE WORLD’S TOP-PERFORMING VICTORIA’S SECRET, AND THE WORLD-FAMOUS MACY’S FLAGSHIP SHARE ANCHOR POSITIONS IN HERALD SQUARE. OPPORTUNITY AWAITS AT 34TH & BWY. EXTRAORDINARY VISIBILITY AND NEAR-NONSTOP PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC GIVE EVERY RETAIL PRESENCE— FROM FLAGSHIP TO BOUTIQUE — AN OUTSIZED IMPACT. DOMINATE HERALD SQUARE 34TH & BWY | THE RETAIL AT HERALD SQUARE IS DESTINED TO BECOME THE BUSIEST, MOST BUZZED-ABOUT SHOPPING DESTINATION IN NEW YORK. COMPREHENSIVE EXTERIOR RENOVATIONS ARE BEING MADE THAT WILL TRANSFORM THE ENTIRE THREE-STORY FAÇADE INTO AN IRRESISTIBLE MAGNET. WITH MORE THAN 445 FT OF WRAPAROUND FRONTAGE ON THREE SIDES, THERE IS NO GREATER ATTRACTION IN THE MARKET. DIVIDE AND CONQUER 34TH STREET 34TH STREET 200’ 100’ 35’ 65’ WITH OVER 110,000 SF OVER FOUR LEVELS, BROADWAY BROADWAY 62’9” 34TH & BWY | THE RETAIL AT HERALD SQUARE 62’9” CORNER FLAGSHIP MARQUEE 34TH STREET 6,200 SF ENTRANCE 4,800 SF OFFERS LIMITLESS OPPORTUNITY. MAKE 2,100 SF YOUR OWN UNIQUE STATEMENT — FROM 25,300 SF CORNER POWER POSITIONS TO EXCLUSIVE 58’6” BROADWAY BOUTIQUE SPACES. 6,800 SF SPACE FRONTAGE 144’3” GROUND FLOOR WEST 34TH STREET 33RD STREET 25,300 SF 200 FT CORNER 85’7” 5,400 SF SECOND FLOOR BROADWAY 32,187 SF 207 FT THIRD FLOOR WEST 33RD STREET 16,713 SF 38 FT 9 IN 38’9” 38’9” LOWER LEVEL 33RD STREET 33RD STREET 36,314 SF GROUND FLOOR - SINGLE-TENANT SCENARIO GROUND FLOOR - MULTI-TENANT SCENARIO 36,314 SF 32,187 SF OPEN TO BELOW 16,713 SF SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR LOWER LEVEL CREATE A LEGEND A CENTURY-OLD TREASURE BORN AS HOTEL MCALPIN, 34TH & BWY | THE RETAIL AT HERALD SQUARE HAS ANCHORED THE MARKET FROM ITS INCEPTION AND PLAYED A LEGENDARY ROLE IN ITS EVOLUTION THROUGH THE RETAIL AGE. IT’S A NEW CHAPTER, AND THE TIME IS NOW FOR YOU TO MAKE HISTORY HERE. AT THE CENTER OF IT ALL WEST 36TH STREET WEST 35TH STREET HERALD SQUARE AN ESTIMATED 20M SHOPPERS EACH YEAR 1 2 3 WEST 34TH STREET B D F M N Q R W 4.3M VISITORS IN 2016 WEST 33RD STREET BROADWAY PENN GREELEY STATION SQUARE WEST 32ND STREET FIFTH AVENUE 4M SEVENTH AVENUE SIXTH AVENUE ANNUAL ATTENDEES WEST 31ST STREET AT THE HEART OF NEW YORK CITY’S BUSIEST TRANSPORTATION HUB IF YOU THINK THERE’S PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC NOW, IMAGINE THE THRONGS OF SHOPPERS AND VISITORS THAT WILL COME WHEN THE EUROPEAN-STYLE PIAZZA ADJACENT TO 34TH & BWY | THE RETAIL AT HERALD SQUARE IS COMPLETED. WITH 158.4 MILLION IN ANNUAL RIDERSHIP – THE HERALD SQUARE AREA IS A HUB OF ACTIVITY, SPECIAL EVENTS, AND ENERGY THAT SERIOUS SHOPPERS CRAVE. CENTRAL PARK COLUMBUS CIRCLE ANNUAL AVERAGE 23.2RIDERSHIP FIFTH OVER AVENUE HOUSEHOLD INCOME WITHIN 1/2 MILE TIMES SQUARE 436K BRYANT PARK ANNUAL EMPLOYEES 64.5RIDERSHIP GRAND CENTRAL ANNUAL K WITHIN 1/2 MILE RIDERSHIP $164 16.9 PORT AUTHORITY ANNUAL BUS TERMINAL RIDERSHIP BRYANT PARK 132.6 ANNUAL 21.9RIDERSHIP HUDSON YARDS NEARLY ESTIMATED PENN STATION/ HERALD SQUARE DAYTIME At the heart of New York’s EAST RIVER 158.4M busiest transportation hub POPULATION ANNUAL N Q R W K RIDERSHIP 203 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL K POPULATION CHELSEA/ 447 MEATPACKING WITHIN ONE MILE DISTRICT UNION SQUARE N Q R W ANNUAL 34.4RIDERSHIP NEAR LY 5,568 M AVERAGE 2 PEDESTRIANS SOHO ANNUAL HUDSON RIVER PER HOUR J Z FINANCIAL VISITORS TO AT 34TH AND N Q R W DISTRICT ANNUAL HERALD SQUARE SIXTH AVENUE 40.5RIDERSHIP J Z R ANNUAL 84.2RIDERSHIP JORDYN COMRAS BARRY FISHBACH ROBERT K. FUTTERMAN PETER WHITENACK BENJAMIN ZACK 212.916.3375 212.331.0115 212.286.9782 212.331.0128 212.916.3372 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 521 FIFTH AVENUE FLOOR 7 NEW YORK, NY 10175 212.599.3700 [email protected] © 2018 ROBERT K. FUTTERMAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC All information is from sources believed reliable, not independently verified, and thus subject to errors, omissions, RKF.COM and modifications such as price, listing, square footage, rates and commissions. All information, estimates and projections subject to change, market assumptions, unknown facts and conditions, and future potentialities. RKF makes no express or implied representations or warranties, as facts and results may vary materially from all information, estimates and projections. All renderings presented are conceptual..
Recommended publications
  • The Occupy Wall Street Movement's Struggle Over Privately Owned
    International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 3162–3181 1932–8036/20170005 A Noneventful Social Movement: The Occupy Wall Street Movement’s Struggle Over Privately Owned Public Space HAO CAO The University of Texas at Austin, USA Why did the Occupy Wall Street movement settle in Zuccotti Park, a privately owned public space? Why did the movement get evicted after a two-month occupation? To answer these questions, this study offers a new tentative framework, spatial opportunity structure, to understand spatial politics in social movements as the interaction of spatial structure and agency. Drawing on opportunity structure models, Sewell’s dual concept of spatial structure and agency, and his concept of event, I analyze how the Occupy activists took over and repurposed Zuccotti Park from a site of consumption and leisure to a space of political claim making. Yet, with unsympathetic public opinion, intensifying policing and surveillance, and unfavorable court rulings privileging property rights over speech rights, the temporary success did not stabilize into a durable transformation of spatial structure. My study not only explains the Occupy movement’s spatial politics but also offers a novel framework to understand the struggle over privatization of public space for future social movements and public speech and assembly in general. Keywords: Occupy Wall Street movement, privately owned public space (POPS), spatial opportunity structure, spatial agency, spatial structure, event Collective actions presuppose the copresence of “large numbers of people into limited spaces” (Sewell, 2001, p. 58). To hold many people, such spaces should, in principle, be public sites that permit free access to everyone. The Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement, targeting the engulfing inequality in the age of financialization and neoliberalization, used occupation of symbolic sites to convey its message.
    [Show full text]
  • Glendale Central Park Community Workshops
    Glendale Central Park Community Workshops IMAGE CREDIT: STREET FOOD CINEMA JANUARY 2018 Glendale Central Park Block Enhancing public open space to function within its evolving urban context GLENDALE CENTRAL PARK BLOCK 2 Community Workshops January 2018 Community Workshop Overview WHY: 1. Share information on the Central Park Block project and potential open space opportunities 2. Collect community input on the desired use and amenities for the Central Open Space WHAT: 1. Short introductory presentation 2. Interactive stations for dialogue and input GLENDALE CENTRAL PARK BLOCK 3 Community Workshops January 2018 Sense of Place: The Site Today Event in the parking alley. View of planting grove along S Louise St. Event in Central Park. GLENDALE CENTRAL PARK BLOCK 4 Community Workshops January 2018 Sense of Place: The Site Today N 0’ 40’ 80’ 120’ GLENDALE CENTRAL PARK BLOCK 5 Community Workshops January 2018 Open Space Comparison EXISTING OPEN SPACE: 76,675 SQ FT N GLENDALE CENTRAL PARK BLOCK 6 Community Workshops January 2018 Open Space Comparison EXISTING OPEN SPACE: 76,675 SQ FT EXISTING OPEN SPACE with PROPOSED BUILDING: 47,630 SQ FT 173’ X 165’ PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT N GLENDALE CENTRAL PARK BLOCK 7 Community Workshops January 2018 Open Space Comparison EXISTING OPEN SPACE: 76,675 SQ FT EXISTING OPEN SPACE WITH PROPOSED BUILDING: 47,630 SQ FT PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 92,590 SQ FT 173’ X 165’ PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT N GLENDALE CENTRAL PARK BLOCK 8 Community Workshops January 2018 Park Components Central 39,975 SQ FT BLOCK OUTLINE HARVARD
    [Show full text]
  • Bowling Green Offices Building Designation Report
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 19, 1995, Designation List 266 LP-1927 BOWLING GREEN OFFICES BUILDING, 5-11 Broadway (aka 5-11 Greenwich Street), Manhattan. Built 1895-98; W. & G. Audsley, architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 13, Lot 5. On May 16, 1995, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the Bowling Green Offices Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Eleven witnesses spoke in favor of designation, including Councilwoman Kathryn Freed and representatives of State Senator Catherine Abate, the New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, the Municipal Art Society, the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Fine Arts Federation, and the Seaport Task Force of Community Board 1. No one spoke in opposition to designation. A representative of the owners took no position regarding the proposed designation but stated that the owners wanted to cooperate with the Commission. The Commission has received several letters and other statements in support of designation including a resolution from Community Board 1. Summary An enormous and beautifully crafted presence at the base of Broadway, facing Bowling Green and extending through the block to Greenwich Street, the seventeen- story Bowling Green Offices Building was designed and built in 1895-98 to be at the forefront of New York commercial towers in terms of its size, architectural style, and amenities. The architects were Scottish-born brothers William James and George Ashdown Audsley, whose fame rests largely on the more than twenty-five books they wrote on craftsmanship, decorative art, and related topics.
    [Show full text]
  • W 26Th St New York, Ny
    21&23 W 26TH ST NEW YORK, NY TWO HISTORIC ADJACENT COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS FOR SALE ASKING PRICE: $19,000,000 21&23 W 26TH ST PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Cushman & Wakefield has been exclusively retained to sell 21 and 23 West 26th Street, two historic adjacent office buildings in New York’s NoMad District. These side-by-side three story plus garden, penthouse and cellar buildings were designed by Thomas Stent and Peabody, Wilson & Brown and constructed in 1881 as the real estate office for brothers William Waldorf Astor and John Jacob Astor III. The Astor Family managed their immense real estate holdings out of these buildings until the elder son, Vincent Astor died and left the buildings to his daughter who was married to millionaire communist, Corliss Lamont. When Lamont died, he bequeathed it to the U.S. Communist Party to use as their headquarters in the mid-1940’s. The exteriors have remained relatively untouched since 1881 and 1922, respectively, until a penthouse addition was placed atop of No. 21 in 1991. The interiors have been renovated and restored over the last 40+ years with the addition of an elevator, central air conditioning, new kitchens and toilets, but the original tiled floors, iron stair, paneled walls, office dividers, fireplaces and even door hardware are all still intact. The buildings combine for approximately 19,045 square feet (No. 21 being 9,290± SF and No. 23 being 9,755± SF), have one elevator inside of No. 23 and are interconnected on the front entryway of the ground floor only. Both buildings contain concrete-lined, walk-in vaults with massive steel safe doors where deeds and cash were stored by the Astor’s and now safeguard archived books.
    [Show full text]
  • 154 WEST 14Th STREET BUILDING, 154-162 West 14Th Street (Aka 51-59 Seventh Avenue), Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission June 28, 2011, Designation List 444 LP-2419 154 WEST 14th STREET BUILDING, 154-162 West 14th Street (aka 51-59 Seventh Avenue), Manhattan. Built 1912-13; Herman Lee Meader, architect; New York Architectural Terra Cotta Co., terra cotta. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 609, Lot 7. On June 22, 2010, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the 154 West 14th Street Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 5). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Three people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of New York Assemblymember Deborah J. Glick, the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, and the Historic Districts Council. Summary The 154 West 14th Street Building (1912-13), a 12-story speculative loft structure constructed for lawyer-banker and real estate developer Leslie R. Palmer, was the first completed New York City design by architect Herman Lee Meader, with whom Palmer collaborated on five projects. The building’s location at the prominent intersection of 14th Street and Seventh Avenue anticipated the southward extension of Seventh Avenue and its new subway line, and benefitted from its proximity and direct access to the Holland Tunnel and west side freight terminals. Arranged in a tripartite base-shaft-capital composition with large window areas, it is a striking and unusual example of a large loft building partly clad in terra cotta – on the three-story base, on the spandrels between the white-brick piers of the midsection, and on the upper portion.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Southern District of New York
    Case 1:21-cv-02221 Document 1 Filed 03/15/21 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HOUSING RIGHTS INITIATIVE Plaintiff, v. COMPASS, INC.; 65 BERGEN LLC; THE STRATFORD, LLC; CORCORAN GROUP LLC; PROSPECT OWNERS CORP.; BOLD LLC; RING DING LLC; E REALTY INTERNATIONAL CORP; JACKSON HT. ROOSEVELT DEVELOPMENT II, LLC; MORGAN ROSE REALTY, LLC; BTG LLC; M Q REALTY LLC; EVA MANAGEMENT LLC; ERIC GOODMAN REALTY CORP.; 308 E 90TH ST. LLC; ROSA MAGIAFREDDA; NEW GOLDEN AGE REALTY INC., d/b/a CENTURY 21 NEW GOLDEN AGE REALTY, INC.; CHAN & SZE REALTY INCORPORATED; PETER Case No. 21-cv-2221 CHRIS MESKOURIS; HELL’S KITCHEN, INC.; MYEROWTZ/SATZ REALTY CORP.; PD PROPERTIES LLC; ECF Case SMART MERCHANTS INCORPORATED; COLUMBUS NY REAL ESTATE INC.; LIONS GATE NEW YORK LLC; MATTHEW GROS WERTER; 780 RIVERSIDE OWNER LLC; ATIAS ENTERPRISES INC.; PARK ROW (1ST AVE.) LTD.; VORO LLC; PSJ HOLDING LLC; WINZONE REALTY INC.; CAMBRIDGE 41-42 OWNERS CORP.; RAY-HWA LIN; JANE H. TSENG; ALEXANDER HIDALGO REAL ESTATE, LLC; EAST 89th ASSOCIATES, LLC; PALEY MANAGEMENT CORP.; MAYET REALTY CORP.; NATURAL HABITAT REALTY INC.; CHELSEA 251 LLC; HOME BY CHOICE LLC; HAMILTON HEIGHTS ASSOCIATES, LLC; JRL-NYC, LLC; EAST 34TH STREET, LLC; BRITTBRAN REALTY, Case 1:21-cv-02221 Document 1 Filed 03/15/21 Page 2 of 64 LLC; MANHATTAN REALTY GROUP; WEGRO REALTY CO; JM PRESTON PROPERTIES, LLC; 1369 FIRST AVENUE, LLC; 931-955 CONEY ISLAND AVE. LLC; BEST MOVE REALTY; FORTUNE GARDENS, INC.; URBAN REAL ESTATE PROPERTY GROUP, INC.; 348 EAST 62ND LLC; JAN REYNOLDS REAL ESTATE; 83RD STREET ASSOCIATES LLC; FIRSTSERVICE REALTY NYC, INC.; TENTH MANHATTAN CORP.; 3LOCATION3.CO REALTY, LLC; 469 CLINTON AVE REALTY LLC; 718 REALTY INC.; DOUBLE A PROPERTY ASSOCIATES – CRESTION ARMS LLC; GUIDANCE REALTY CORP.; COL, LLC; BEST SERVICE REALTY CORP.; CHANDLER MANAGEMENT, LLC; MTY GROUP, INC.; 165TH ST.
    [Show full text]
  • 14Th Street Corridor Traffic Analysis Overview Introduction in Late
    February 22, 2018 14th Street Corridor Traffic Analysis Overview Introduction In late October 2012, Hurricane Sandy devastated New York City and left 43 New Yorkers dead, 2 million people without power, flooding in 17% of the city affecting some 90,000 buildings, and $19 billion in damages to the City alone. The effects of the extensive damage to the subway system serve as a reminder of Sandy’s huge impact. All six of the MTA-NYCT’s East River subway tunnels were inundated with storm water surges, corroding the various mechanical, electrical and communications components with saltwater. The 92-year-old tubes of the Canarsie Tunnel, connecting Brooklyn and Manhattan via the L Line, were flooded with seven million gallons of salt water. While the tubes were drained and service was restored just 10 days after the storm, it was clear that a full reconstruction of the tunnel was required. Service Planning for the Canarsie Tube Closure Starting in April 2019, the 15-month closure of the L train’s Canarsie Tunnel will directly affect 275,000 daily customers. While MTA New York City Transit (NYCT) and the New York City Department of Transportation (DOT) have been working together to provide alternatives and new travel options, it is difficult to overstate the significant disruption and inconvenience being brought to the lives of hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers. With most L commuters moving to other subways, even those New Yorkers who do not ride the L will see their commutes affected by the influx of L riders on their subway lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Manhattan
    WASHINGTON STREET IS 131/ CANAL STREETCanal Street M1 bus Chinatown M103 bus M YMCA M NQRW (weekday extension) HESTER STREET M20 bus Canal St Canal to W 147 St via to E 125 St via 103 20 Post Office 3 & Lexington Avs VESTRY STREET to W 63 St/Bway via Street 5 & Madison Avs 7 & 8 Avs VARICK STREET B= YORK ST AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 6 only6 Canal Street Firehouse ACE LISPENARD STREET Canal Street D= LAIGHT STREET HOLLAND AT&T Building Chinatown JMZ CANAL STREET TUNNEL Most Precious EXIT Health Clinic Blood Church COLLISTER STREET CANAL STREET WEST STREET Beach NY Chinese B BEACH STStreet Baptist Church 51 Park WALKER STREET St Barbara Eldridge St Manhattan Express Bus Service Chinese Greek Orthodox Synagogue HUDSON STREET ®0= Merchants’ Fifth Police Church Precinct FORSYTH STREET 94 Association MOTT STREET First N œ0= to Lower Manhattan ERICSSON PolicePL Chinese BOWERY Confucius M Precinct ∑0= 140 Community Plaza Center 22 WHITE ST M HUBERT STREET M9 bus to M PIKE STREET X Grand Central Terminal to Chinatown84 Eastern States CHURCH STREET Buddhist Temple Union Square 9 15 BEACH STREET Franklin Civic of America 25 Furnace Center NY Chinatown M15 bus NORTH MOORE STREET WEST BROADWAY World Financial Center Synagogue BAXTER STREET Transfiguration Franklin Archive BROADWAY NY City Senior Center Kindergarten to E 126 St FINN Civil & BAYARD STREET Asian Arts School FRANKLIN PL Municipal via 1 & 2 Avs SQUARE STREET CENTRE Center X Street Courthouse Upper East Side to FRANKLIN STREET CORTLANDT ALLEY 1 Buddhist Temple PS 124 90 Criminal Kuan Yin World
    [Show full text]
  • Portnyc Developing the City's Freight and Passenger Infrastructure To
    New York Harbor is the third-largest port in the United States and the largest port complex on the Atlantic Coast. New York City Economic Development Corporation’s PortNYC develops the City’s freight and passenger transportation infrastructure to strengthen the region’s economic growth. PortNYC facilities include marine cargo terminals, rail facilities, cruise terminals, ferry landings, active maritime piers, vessel berthing opportunities, and aviation facilities within New York City’s five boroughs. Marine Cargo Terminals New York City’s ports are America’s gateway to the largest and wealthiest consumer market in the United States. PortNYC supports the local economy by enabling firms to bring goods to market by vessel, one of the most efficient modes of freight transportation. Approximately 400,000 containers move through New York City’s seaports annually, and recent infrastructure upgrades to the city’s marine cargo terminals will allow more than a million tons of cargo to arrive by water instead of truck. The City promotes and incentivizes the maritime industry by maintaining and leasing these facilities and designating them Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas. CARGO FACILITIES • Global Container Terminal—New York (containers, break-bulk, and ro-ro), Staten Island • Red Hook Container Terminal (containers, break-bulk, and ro-ro), Brooklyn • South Brooklyn Marine Terminal (break-bulk, ro-ro, and project cargoes), Brooklyn Global Container Terminal on Staten Island is • 25th Street Freight Pier (aggregate), Brooklyn the city’s largest deep-sea marine facility. New York City is a maritime hub for support services hosting tugs, barges, and major ship repair facilities. NYC recently invested $115 million to reactivate marine and rail cargo facilities on the South Brooklyn waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Departmentof Parks
    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENTOF PARKS BOROUGH OF THE BRONX CITY OF NEW YORK JOSEPH P. HENNESSY, Commissioner HERALD SQUARE PRESS NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PARKS BOROUGH OF 'I'HE BRONX January 30, 1922. Hon. John F. Hylan, Mayor, City of New York. Sir : I submit herewith annual report of the Department of Parks, Borough of The Bronx, for 1921. Respect fully, ANNUAL REPORT-1921 In submitting to your Honor the report of the operations of this depart- ment for 1921, the last year of the first term of your administration, it will . not be out of place to review or refer briefly to some of the most important things accomplished by this department, or that this department was asso- ciated with during the past 4 years. The very first problem presented involved matters connected with the appropriation for temporary use to the Navy Department of 225 acres in Pelham Bay Park for a Naval Station for war purposes, in addition to the 235 acres for which a permit was given late in 1917. A total of 481 one- story buildings of various kinds were erected during 1918, equipped with heating and lighting systems. This camp contained at one time as many as 20,000 men, who came and went constantly. AH roads leading to the camp were park roads and in view of the heavy trucking had to be constantly under inspection and repair. The Navy De- partment took over the pedestrian walk from City Island Bridge to City Island Road, but constructed another cement walk 12 feet wide and 5,500 feet long, at the request of this department, at an expenditure of $20,000.
    [Show full text]
  • 34Th Street Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis
    34th Street Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis @ !.++<&571/9>+6'793+495,!7'486579'9/54/4)522'(57'9/54</9.!+<&571/9> !7'48/9'4*</9.!:8536'4>/88654857/4-'6750+)995/362+3+494+<57+4.'4)+* 97'48/98+7;/)+'254-9. 97++9,7539.+:*854/;+7959.+'89/;+7/4'4.'99'4 @ 86'795,2'&9.+/9>/8<571/4-95/3675;+97';+29/3+8(>'**/4-97'48/9)'6')/9>? ,57+=/89/4-7+8/*+498;/8/9578'4*<571+78'4*95'))5335*'9+-75<9. @ 429+74'9/;+84'2>8/8/8):77+492>(+-/44/4-95)548/*+797'48/9569/54895*+)7+'8e 97';+29/3+8,5797'48/97/*+78957+*:)+;+./):2'7'4*6+*+897/'4)54-+89/54'254- 9. 97++9'4*95675;/*+)54;+4/+49)544+)9/548959.+3'0572'4*:8+8'4* 97'486579'9/54,')/2/9/+8'254-9.+)577/*57 AV VI AV W 43 ST E 43 ST E 43 ST PARK PARK N DE PEW PL PL 9 AV E 42 ST W 42 ST R CITY PORT DO AUTHORITY TU DYER AV W 41 ST E 41 ST E 41 ST PIER 79/ W. 39TH STREET 11 AV BUS TERMINAL FERRY TERMINAL W 40 ST E 40 ST AP FIRST L 1 AV 1 AV TN W 39 ST E 39 ST AVENUE TWN DISON PARK AV MA 34th Street Transit Corridor Study N MD Q PROPERTIES W 383 STST E 38 ST W 37 ST E 37 ST JACOB JAVITS 10 AV W 36 ST E 36 ST CENTER F D ET EN R D L L L TN R ET TN E.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Square 14Th Street District Vision Plan
    UNION SQUARE 14TH STREET DISTRICT VISION PLAN DESIGN PARTNER JANUARY 2021 In dedication to the Union Square-14th Street community, and all who contributed to the Visioning process. This is just the beginning. We look forward to future engagement with our neighborhood and agency partners as we move forward in our planning, programming, and design initiatives to bring this vision to reality. Lynne Brown William Abramson Jennifer Falk Ed Janoff President + Co-Chair Co-Chair Executive Director Deputy Director CONTENTS Preface 7 Introduction 8 Union Square: Past, Present and Future 15 The Vision 31 Vision Goals Major Projects Park Infrastructure Streetscape Toolkit Implementation 93 Conclusion 102 Appendix 107 Community Engagement Transit Considerations 4 UNION SQUARE PARTNERSHIP | VISIONING PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 6 UNION SQUARE PARTNERSHIP | VISIONING PLAN Photo: Jane Kratochvil A NEW ERA FOR UNION SQUARE DEAR FRIENDS, For 45 years, the Union Square Partnership has been improving the neighborhood for our 75,000 residents, 150,000 daily workers, and millions of annual visitors. Our efforts in sanitation, security, horticulture, and placemaking have sustained and accelerated growth for decades. But our neighborhood’s growth is not over. With more than 1 million square feet of planned development underway, it is time to re-invest for tomorrow. The projects and programs detailed in the Union Square-14th Street District Vision Plan will not just focus on the neighborhood’s competitive advantage but continue to make the area a resource for all New Yorkers for generations to come. This plan is a jumping-off point for collaboration with our constituents. At its center, the vision proposes a dramatic 33% expansion of public space.
    [Show full text]