DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Mary Astell 3.1 Secondary Sources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Mary Astell 3.1 Secondary Sources 2017 Mary Astell 3.1 Secondary Sources (Astell – Mary) The following represent a selection of secondary sources on Astell. Achinstein, Sharon. 2007. “Mary Astell, Religion, and Feminism: Texts in Motion.” In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, edited by William Kolbrener and Michael Michelson, 17-30. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Ahearn, Kathleen A. 2009. “The Passions and Self-Esteem in Mary Astell’s Early Feminist Prose.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Denver. Ahearn, Kathleen. 2016. “Mary Astell’s Account of Feminine Self-Esteem.” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, edited by Alice Sowaal and Penny A. Weiss. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. Alvarez, David P. 2011. "Reason and Religious Tolerance: Mary Astell's Critique of Shaftesbury." Eighteenth-Century Studies 44(4): 475-494. Apetrei, Sarah L. T. 2008. "'Call No Man Master Upon Earth': Mary Astell's Tory Feminism and an Unknown Correspondence." Eighteenth-Century Studies 4(4): 507-523. Apetrei, Sarah L. T. 2010. Women, feminism and religion in early Enlightenment England (Cambridge studies in early modern British history). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. 2017 Mary Astell 3.1 Secondary Sources Berges, Sandrine. 2011. "Reason Nipped in the Bud: Freedom and Education in the Vindication of the Rights of Woman (in Turkish)." Felsefe Tartismalari (Philosophical Discussions): A Turkish Journal of Philosophy 46: 18-38. Blank, Andreas. 2015. "Mary Astell on Flattery and Self-Esteem." The Monist 98(1): 53-63. Boyle, Deborah. 2011. “Astell and Cartesian ‘Scientia'.” In The New Science and Women's Literary Discourse: Prefiguring Frankenstein, edited by Judy A. Hayden, 99-112. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Broad, Jacqueline. 2002. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Broad, Jacqueline. 2003. "Adversaries or Allies? Occasional Thoughts on the Masham-Astell Exchange." Eighteenth-Century Thought 1: 123-149. Broad, Jacqueline, and Karen Green 2009. “Mary Astell.” In A history of women's political thought in Europe, 1400-1700, 265-287. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Broad, Jacqueline. 2009. "Mary Astell on Virtuous Friendship." Parergon 26(2): 65-86. Broad, Jacqueline. 2012. "Impressions in the Brain: Malebranche on Women, and Women on Malebranche." Intellectual History Review 22(3): 373-389. 2 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. 2017 Mary Astell 3.1 Secondary Sources Broad, Jacqueline. 2014. "Women on Liberty in Early Modern England." Philosophy Compass 9(2): 112-122. Broad, Jacqueline. 2015. The Philosophy of Mary Astell: An Early Modern Theory of Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bryson, Cynthia B. 1998. "Mary Astell: Defender of the 'Disembodied Mind'." Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 13(4): 40-62. Choi, Julie. 2010. "Born Free? Mary Astell's Reflections upon Marriage and Defoe's Roxana." British and American Fiction to 1900 17(2): 5. Choi, Julie. 2011. "Women, Religion, and Enlightenment: Mary Astell's Serious Proposal to the Ladies." Feminist Studies in English Literature 19(1): 5. Choi, Julie. 2014. "Mary Astell`s The Christian Religion: Life, Liberty and Happiness as Professed by a Daughter of the Church of England." Feminist Studies in English Literature 22(1): 5. Clarke, Desmond M. 2013. The Equality of the Sexes: Three Feminist Texts of the Seventeenth Century. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Deluna, D. N. 1993. "Mary Astell: England's First Feminist Literary Critic." Women's Studies 22(2): 231-242. 3 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. 2017 Mary Astell 3.1 Secondary Sources Detlefsen, Karen. 2016. “Custom, Freedom, and Equality: Mary Astell on Marriage and Women’s Education.” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, edited by Alice Sowaal and Penny A. Weiss. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. Detlefsen, Karen. Forthcoming. “Cartesianism and its Feminist Promise and Limits: The Case of Mary Astell.” In Mind and Nature in Descartes and Cartesianism, edited by Catherine Wilson & Stephen Gaukroger. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Deveraux, Johanna. 2008. "''Affecting the Shade': Attribution, Authorship, and Anonymity in An Essay in Defence of the Female Sex." Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature 27(1): 17-37. Deveraux, Johanna. 2009. "A Paradise Within? Mary Astell, Sarah Scott and the Limits of Utopia." Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 32(1): 53-67. Duran, Jane. 2006. Eight Women Philosophers: Theory, Politics, and Feminism. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press. Duran, Jane. 2000. “Mary Astell: A Pre-Humean Christian Empiricist and Feminist.” Presenting Women Philosophers. Philadelphia, Temple University Press. Duran, Jane. 2014. "Christianity and Women's Education: Anna Maria van Schurman and Mary Astell." Philosophy & Theology 26(1): 3. Dussinger, John A. 2013. "Mary Astell's Revisions of Some Reflections upon Marriage (1730)." The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 107(1): 49-79. 4 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. 2017 Mary Astell 3.1 Secondary Sources Ellenzweig, Sarah. 2003. "The Love of God and the Radical Enlightenment: Mary Astell's Brush with Spinoza." Journal of the History of Ideas 64(3): 379-397. Glover, Susan Paterson. 2016. “Further Reflections upon Marriage: Mary Astell and Sarah Chapone.” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, edited by Alice Sowaal and Penny A. Weiss. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. Goldie, Mark. 2007. “Mary Astell and John Locke.” In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, edited by William Kolbrener and Michael Michelson, 65-85. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. Harol, Corrinne. 2007. “Mary Astell’s Law of the Heart.” In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, edited by William Kolbrener and Michael Michelson, 87-98. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Harris, Jocelyn. 2012. "Philosophy and Sexual Politics in Mary Astell and Samuel Richardson." Intellectual History Review 22(3): 445-463. Hartmann, Van C. 1998. "Tory Feminism in Mary Astell's 'Bart'lemy Fair'." The Journal of Narrative Technique 28(3): 243-265. Johns, Alessa. 1996. "Mary Astell's 'Excited Needles': Theorizing Feminist Utopia in Seventeenth-Century England." Utopian Studies 7(1): 60-74. Kinnaird, Joan K. 1979. "Mary Astell and the Conservative Contribution to English Feminism." The Journal of British Studies 19(1): 53-75. 5 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. 2017 Mary Astell 3.1 Secondary Sources Kolbrener, William. 2003. "Gendering the Modern: Mary Astell's Feminist Historiography." The Eighteenth Century 44(1): 1-24. Kolbrener, William. 2007. “Astell’s ‘Design of Friendship’ in Letters and A Serious Proposal, Part I.” In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, edited by William Kolbrener and Michael Michelson, 49-64. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Kolbrener, William, and Michael Michelson. 2007. “’Dreading to Engage Her’: The Critical Reception of Mary Astell.” In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, edited by William Kolbrener and Michael Michelson, 1-16. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Kolbrener, William, and Michael Michelson, eds. 2007. Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Kolbrener, William. 2014. “Slander, Conversation, and the Making of the Christian Public Sphere in Mary Astell's 'A serious proposal to the ladies' and 'The Christian religion as profess'd by a daugher of the Church of England'.” Religion and Women in Britain, c. 1660-1760, edited by Sarah Apetrei, 131-143. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Langton, Rae. 2000. “Feminism in Epistemology: Exclusion and Objectification.” In The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy, edited by Miranda Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby, 127-145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lascano, Marcy. 2016. “Mary Astell on the Existence and Nature of God.” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, edited by Alice Sowaal and Penny A. Weiss. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. 6 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. 2017 Mary Astell 3.1 Secondary Sources Leduc, Guyonne. 2008. "Mary Astell. Theorist of Freedom from Domination." Études anglaises 61(4): 475. Leduc, Guyonne. 2011. "Mary Astell et le féminisme en Angleterre au XVIIe siècle." Études anglaises 64(3): 376. Lister,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Eloquence of Mary Astell
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2005 The eloquence of Mary Astell Sutherland, Christine Mason University of Calgary Press Sutherland, C. M. "The eloquence of Mary Astell". University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/49316 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca University of Calgary Press www.uofcpress.com THE ELOQUENCE OF MARY ASTELL by Christine Mason Sutherland ISBN 978-1-55238-661-3 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Women, Two Spheres, and a Contract: a Comparative Study of Mary Astell and Mary Wollstonecraft Through the Lens of Carole Pateman's "The Sexual Contract"
    Dominican Scholar Graduate Master's Theses, Capstones, and Culminating Projects Student Scholarship 5-2017 Three Women, Two Spheres, and A Contract: A Comparative Study of Mary Astell and Mary Wollstonecraft Through the Lens of Carole Pateman's "The Sexual Contract" Robyn Burke Dabora Dominican University of California https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2017.hum.02 Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you. Recommended Citation Dabora, Robyn Burke, "Three Women, Two Spheres, and A Contract: A Comparative Study of Mary Astell and Mary Wollstonecraft Through the Lens of Carole Pateman's "The Sexual Contract"" (2017). Graduate Master's Theses, Capstones, and Culminating Projects. 271. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2017.hum.02 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Dominican Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Master's Theses, Capstones, and Culminating Projects by an authorized administrator of Dominican Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Three Women, Two Spheres, and A Contract: A Comparative Study of Mary Astell and Mary Wollstonecraft Through the Lens of Carole Pateman’s The Sexual Contract By Robyn Burke Dabora A culminating thesis submitted to the faculty of Dominican University of California in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Graduate Humanities San Rafael, CA May 2017 ii This thesis, written under the direction of the candidate's thesis advisor and approved by the department chair, has been presented to and accepted by the department of Graduate Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovering the Rhetoric of Women's Intellectual
    ―THE ALPHABET OF SENSE‖: REDISCOVERING THE RHETORIC OF WOMEN‘S INTELLECTUAL LIBERTY by BRANDY SCHILLACE Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Adviser: Dr. Christopher Flint Department of English CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May 2010 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of ________Brandy Lain Schillace___________________________ candidate for the __English PhD_______________degree *. (signed)_____Christopher Flint_______________________ (chair of the committee) ___________Athena Vrettos_________________________ ___________William R. Siebenschuh__________________ ___________Atwood D. Gaines_______________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) ___November 12, 2009________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. ii Table of Contents Preface ―The Alphabet of Sense‖……………………………………...1 Chapter One Writers and ―Rhetors‖: Female Educationalists in Context…..8 Chapter Two Mechanical Habits and Female Machines: Arguing for the Autonomous Female Self…………………………………….42 Chapter Three ―Reducing the Sexes to a Level‖: Revolutionary Rhetorical Strategies and Proto-Feminist Innovations…………………..71 Chapter Four Intellectual Freedom and the Practice of Restraint: Didactic Fiction versus the Conduct Book ……………………………….…..101 Chapter Five The Inadvertent Scholar: Eliza Haywood‘s Revision
    [Show full text]
  • Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy
    Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy EILEEN O’NEILL It has now been more than a dozen years since the Eastern Division of the APA invited me to give an address on what was then a rather innovative topic: the published contributions of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century women to philosophy.1 In that address, I highlighted the work of some sixty early modern women. I then said to the audience, “Why have I presented this somewhat interesting, but nonetheless exhausting . overview of seventeenth- and eigh- teenth-century women philosophers? Quite simply, to overwhelm you with the presence of women in early modern philosophy. It is only in this way that the problem of women’s virtually complete absence in contemporary histories of philosophy becomes pressing, mind-boggling, possibly scandalous.” My presen- tation had attempted to indicate the quantity and scope of women’s published philosophical writing. It had also suggested that an acknowledgment of their contributions was evidenced by the representation of their work in the scholarly journals of the period and by the numerous editions and translations of their texts that continued to appear into the nineteenth century. But what about the status of these women in the histories of philosophy? Had they ever been well represented within the histories written before the twentieth century? In the second part of my address, I noted that in the seventeenth century Gilles Menages, Jean de La Forge, and Marguerite Buffet produced doxogra- phies of women philosophers, and that one of the most widely read histories of philosophy, that by Thomas Stanley, contained a discussion of twenty-four women philosophers of the ancient world.
    [Show full text]
  • Utopia in Margaret Cavendish's Blazing World
    The 'Singular' Utopia in Margaret Cavendish's Blazing World In Hye Ha Singularity simultaneously intrigued, haggled, suppressed, and finally epitomized Margaret Cavendish's entire life. Through her strikingly indecorous costumes, similarly improper command of language, eagerness to participate in the public sphere, and audacious attempts to publish her own works in her lifetime, the Duchess of Newcastle craved for social recognition of her originality. Most of her attempts at self-fashioning, however, engendered manifold ridicules and foulmouthed criticisms." As a way to defend herself against such odium, Cavendish resorted to the class privilege bolstered by her marriage to William Cavendish and false modesty - a commonplace rhetoric that female writers adopted in proclaiming and protecting their authorship. Yet, what is 'singular' about Cavendish is that she created her own world within narratives; in so doing, I believe, she could gain a genuine sense of ownershiplauthorship. This unfathomable extent of Cavendish's anxiety and ambition is disclosed 1) John Evelyn's ballad depicting "cava1iere"-like Cavendish is frequently referred, for it conveyed the degree of bewilderment that her contemporaries felt toward her. (See Sara Heller Mendelson's "Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of New Castle," The Mental World of Stuart Women, 46) Pepys's journal entry of 26 April 1667 also registered his misogynistic antipathy toward this seemingly presumptuous lady, a threat to gender distinction. Met my Lady Newcastle going with her coaches and footmen all in velvet: herself, whom I never saw before, as I have heard for often described, for all the town-talk is now-a-days of her extravagances, with her velvet-cap, her hair about her ears; many black patches, because of pimples about her mouth; naked-necked, and a black just-aucorps.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Philosophers’, in the Continuum Encyclopedia of British Philosophy, Edited by Anthony Grayling, Andrew Pyle, and Naomi Goulder (Bristol: Thoemmes
    [Please note that this is a preprint version of a published article: Jacqueline Broad, ‘Female Philosophers’, in The Continuum Encyclopedia of British Philosophy, edited by Anthony Grayling, Andrew Pyle, and Naomi Goulder (Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum, 2006), vol. II, pp. 1066-9. Please cite the published version.] FEMALE Philosophers There is a rich and diverse tradition of women philosophers in the history of British thought. Scholars have only recently begun to acknowledge the true extent of this tradition. In the past, the few women thinkers who were recognized were seen as the followers or helpmeets of their more famous male peers. A few women were regarded as philosophers in their own right, but typically only in so far as their ideas conformed to accepted paradigms of philosophy. If the women’s texts did not fit these paradigms, then those texts tended to be examined in a piecemeal fashion or ignored altogether. More recently, however, there has been a shift in perspective in the historiography of women’s philosophy. Some scholars assert that if women’s writings do not fit our modern paradigms, then it is the paradigms that have to be abandoned or re-evaluated, not the texts. The study of women’s ideas enables us to see that British philosophy in earlier periods is much more varied and complex than modern philosophers tend to acknowledge. There is now an awareness that in early modern philosophy the lines between politics, morality, theology, metaphysics, and science were often blurred. Many women who would not pass as philosophers today were almost certainly regarded as philosophers in that time.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ELOQUENCE of MARY ASTELL by Christine Mason Sutherland ISBN 978-1-55238-661-3
    Archiving note from Unglue.it Notwithstanding the publisher's copyright statement which follows, the cover art for this book is the painting Bildnisstudie einer jungen Dame by Sir Joshua Reynolds dating from 1765-1770 and is in the public domain throughout the world. It may copied and re-used without restriction. See the Europeana website for more information: http://www.europeana.eu/portal/reco rd/15502/GG_6264.html University of Calgary Press www.uofcpress.com THE ELOQUENCE OF MARY ASTELL by Christine Mason Sutherland ISBN 978-1-55238-661-3 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence. This means that you are free to copy, distribute, display or perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to its authors and publisher, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without our express permission.
    [Show full text]
  • 252 EMWJ Vol . 9, No . 2 • Spring 2015 Book Reviews Their Homes in Order to Discover Their Opportunities for Self-Expression and Empowerment” (257)
    252 EMWJ Vol . 9, No . 2 • Spring 2015 Book Reviews their homes in order to discover their opportunities for self-expression and empowerment” (257). Jessica L . Malay University of Huddersfield Mary Astell, The Christian Religion, as Professed by a Daughter of the Church of England . Ed . Jacqueline Broad . Toronto: Iter / Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, 2013 . 344 pp . $32 00. ISBN 978-0-7727-2142-6 . There has been, of late, something of a small scholarly renaissance on the late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century thinker, Mary Astell. She has long been held in high esteem for her three feminist tracts, for which we now have modern editions, A Serious Proposal to the Ladies (1694), A Serious Proposal to the Ladies, Part II (1697) and Reflections on Marriage (1700). Astell’s Tory politics and robust stance against Dissenters, reli- gious toleration, and all Whig principles have also engendered scholarly interest. In 1996, Patricia Springborg published two of the three polemics Astell authored in the age of Queen Anne — A Fair Way with Dissenters and Their Patrons (a response to Daniel Defoe’s More Short Ways with Dissenters) and Impartial Enquiry into the Causes of the Civil War (a response to White Kennett’s A Compassionate Enquiry into the Causes of the Civil War), all published in 1704 — in the Cambridge series on the History of Political Thought. Finally, Astell’s keen understanding of and engagement in the philosophical milieu of her time has also captured the attention of scholars such as E. Derek Taylor and Melvyn New, who edited in 2004 her epistolary conversation with the Neo-Platonist, John Norris, Letters Concerning the Love of God (1694).
    [Show full text]
  • Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women's Human Rights
    WOLLSTONECRAFT, MILL, AND WOMEN’S HUMAN RIGHTS Y6872.indb i 1/6/16 10:37:56 AM This page intentionally left blank EILEEN HUNT BOTTING Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women’s Human Rights NEW HAVEN AND LONDON Y6872.indb iii 1/6/16 10:37:56 AM Published with assistance from the foundation established in memory of Philip Hamilton McMillan of the Class of 1894, Yale College. Copyright © 2016 by Eileen Hunt Botting. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail sales.press@yale .edu (U.S. offi ce) or [email protected] (U.K. offi ce). Set in Janson Oldstyle type by Newgen North America. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Control Number: 2015947730 isbn: 978-0-300-18615-4 (cloth : alk. paper) A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ansi /niso z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Y6872.indb iv 1/6/16 10:37:56 AM CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction: Women’s Human Rights as Integral to Universal Human Rights 1 one A Philosophical Genealogy of Women’s Human Rights 26 two Foundations of Universal Human Rights: Wollstonecraft’s Rational Theology and Mill’s Liberal Utilitarianism
    [Show full text]
  • William Thompson and Anna Wheeler: Equality and Utilitarianism in the 19Th Century
    WILLIAM THOMPSON AND ANNA WHEELER: EQUALITY AND UTILITARIANISM IN THE 19TH CENTURY by Laura Rae Kelly A thesis submitted to the Department of Political Studies In conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (July, 2015) Copyright © Laura Rae Kelly, 2015 Abstract This dissertation examines the work of William Thompson and Anna Wheeler in relation to more prominent feminist political theorists of the period. It argues that, read in light of Thompson and Wheeler’s Appeal of One Half the Human Race (Appeal), John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women (Subjection) represents a step backward in the history of feminist political thought. Mill’s Subjection reproduces many of the limitations in Mary Wollstonecraft’s groundbreaking Vindication of the Rights of Woman (Vindication), limitations that had been overcome by Thompson and Wheeler’s Appeal, which was published in between the publication of Vindication and Subjection. These limitations center on the relationship between women’s access to self-government and happiness, the economy, and the lack of compensation for domestic and reproductive labor. Unlike Appeal, Vindication and Subjection limit women’s freedoms by maintaining women’s obligations to perform unpaid labor within the private sphere. Vindication and Subjection are unable to recognize women’s biological difference without reducing women’s role to that difference. Thompson and Wheeler resolve the tension between capitalism and gender equality by making the case for radically democratic communities of mutual co-operation, where all useful labor, including reproductive labor, is compensated. They use utilitarianism to advance this argument, but some contemporary scholars describe them as conservative utilitarians.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglicanism and Revolution Feature in Winter Issue of Anglican and Episcopal History
    H-Announce Anglicanism and revolution feature in winter issue of Anglican and Episcopal History Announcement published by Matthew Payne on Thursday, February 4, 2021 Type: Journal Wisconsin, Subject Fields: American History / Studies, Religious Studies and Theology The winter issue of Anglican and Episcopal History (AEH) is now in print. The latest issue of the peer-reviewed journal of the Historical Society of the Episcopal Church features studies and book reviews that examine the relationship between monarchy, revolution, Puritanism, and the Church of England. Two detailed studies consider the role of Anglicanism in England’s seventeenth century revolutions. First, John William Klein considers a rural case study of patronage during the Nonjuring Schism, a division in the Church of England created when some clerics refused to swear allegiance to monarchs William and Mary after the Glorious Revolution of 1688. In “Francis Cherry, Patronage, and the Shottesbrooke Nonjurors”, Klein offers a rural case study of patronage based on the relationship between Anglo-Irish scholar and theologian Henry Dodwell the Elder (1641-1711) and country squire Francis Cherry (1665-1713). Klein concludes that the countryside estate of Shottesbrooke Park in Berkshire, England, was “a model of rural patronage and community for Nonjurors” and argues that “patronage was essential to survival of the Nonjurors.” The small Nonjuring movement fizzled by the mid-1700s. Kent M. Pettit then invites readers to consider ways King Charles II used the Great Fire of London in 1666 to strengthen the shaky monarchy. Pettit considers the debate between preservation and innovation in regards to the destruction of the medieval Old St.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Introduction Sandrine Bergès Alan Coffee DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198766841.003.0001 Abstract and Keywords In the Introduction to this volume, the authors attempt to reflect on the place of Wollstonecraft studies in the recovery project through the attempts to (re-) introduce texts by women in academic philosophy; to present a brief biography of Mary Wollstonecraft, and to introduce each chapter in the volume. This introduction also presents aspects of Wollstonecraft scholarship: a study of her intellectual background, from her possible acquaintance with ancient texts to her engagement with eighteenth-century political philosophy; and her social and political thought, showing that it goes beyond feminism and deals with questions of children and animal rights, property rights and slavery. The chapter concludes with a more detailed look at her specifically republican outlook on freedom. Keywords: Wollstonecraft, feminism, history of feminism, history of philosophy, influences, life, recovery project, social and political philosophy, women philosophers Page 1 of 16 Introduction Anyone glancing through the course reading lists at most universities, or browsing the bookshelves in an academic bookshop, might reasonably conclude that philosophy was something that had been written historically only by men. Its standard lists of great names, beginning with Plato and Aristotle, perhaps continuing with Descartes, Hobbes, Spinoza, and Locke, moving on to Kant and Hegel, and into the last century with Russell, Wittgenstein, and others, rarely contain a single woman. Indeed, many students often struggle to name even one woman philosopher before the mid-twentieth century and Simone de Beauvoir or Hannah Arendt. Yet women have been writing philosophy throughout this history.
    [Show full text]