Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction th Dubai International Academy Model United Nations 2018| 10 ​ Annual Session ​ ​ ​ Forum: Nuclear Security Summit Issue: Developing stringent laws of punishment towards nations and non-state actors that make use of unauthorized nuclear material. Student Officer: Arun Pancholia Position: Deputy President of the Nuclear Security Summit ​ Introduction Over the past few decades, Nuclear material has been used on a large scale, providing energy to many homes and in some cases, to entire cities. However, nuclear material does have various negative impacts on the environment. If Nuclear material is somehow exposed to a natural environment, it can have devastating impacts on the wildlife and ecosystem in place. For example, the disaster that occurred th in Chernobyl on the 26 ​ of April, in 1986, where a nuclear reactor had malfunctioned, chemical ​ explosions that occurred in the reactor were so powerful that it blew off the 1000-ton top off the reactor. Due to the poor structure of the power plant in Chernobyl, the radioactive material escaped from its containment and contaminated the area, and surrounding areas, leaving the city of Chernobyl empty, as it cannot be inhabited for 20000 years due to the nuclear damage. After this incident, many people have begun to fear nuclear material, and simultaneously, people have also understood the power it possesses and have implemented the use of nuclear energy in their own countries. Nevertheless, the incident that occurred in Chernobyl shows the dangers of Nuclear energy, and why nations and non-state actors should have very stringent laws on the use of unauthorised nuclear material. After such accidents, people have begun to understand the seriousness of nuclear material. Additionally, many countries have established incredibly strict laws regarding the use of nuclear material, and have done their best to ensure that nuclear material isn’t wasted. However, many non-state actors utilise unauthorised nuclear material for various purposes, and with such dangerous power within the hands of people that aren’t under the law, it can cause extremely negative implications for the entire world. Therefore, the laws on the use of unauthorised nuclear material must be more stringent. Research Report | Page 1 of 11 ​ ​ th Dubai International Academy Model United Nations 2018| 10 ​ Annual Session ​ ​ ​ Agreements have been placed by many countries such as the very popular deal between Iran and the United States of America, in which Iran has agreed to no longer produce weapons grade plutonium, which can be used in the production of atomic bombs. This will be done to ensure that no violent activity can occur between the two countries, and to ensure that Iran can no longer pose a threat to opposing countries with their extensive production of weapons grade plutonium. Definition of Key Terms Nuclear Material Nuclear Material consists of the following metals: Uranium, plutonium and thorium, in any form. ​ Non-State Actor An individual or organisation that has significant political influence but is not allied to any country or ​ state Stringent Strict, precise or exacting. ​ Key Issues Legal Issues Surrounding the Use of Unauthorised Nuclear Material The unauthorised use of nuclear weapons and nuclear objects is “A Legal Gap” worldwide. This statement is rather debateable, due to the fact that when a nuclear attack occurs, aid is given to those effected by the attack primarily, and less attention is given to those that commit the nuclear attack. This leads people to believe that the laws placed around the unauthorised use of nuclear materials aren’t stringent enough. Simultaneously parties such as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea have delivered many threats to some of the p5 nations, such as the United States of America, threatening to attack them using advanced nuclear weaponry which will cause extreme damage to the geography and population of the country, making the entire city completely inhabitable. Post effects of Nuclear Attacks Research Report | Page 2 of 11 ​ ​ th Dubai International Academy Model United Nations 2018| 10 ​ Annual Session ​ ​ ​ Over the past few decades nuclear material has caused devastating events to unfold. From the large nuclear bomb that occurred in Nagasaki, to the recent leakages of nuclear waste. It has just gone to show how much the world needs to regulate the use of nuclear substances. The recent disaster in Fukushima, Japan, is an example of what dangers can be done by nuclear leakages, such as the disfiguration of the wildlife near the location of the disaster. Furthermore, larger scale disasters such as that in Ukraine have gone to show that nuclear energy is far stronger than any form of energy we have today, as it can leave places, such as Chernobyl inhabitable and cause severe impact to the environment and locality of the region, and result in the loss of life on a grand scale. In fact, when the power plant failed, 56 people died instantly, 9 of which were children. Additionally, there were 4000 people who acquired diseases such as cancer, and then there were 600,000 people who were exposed to high levels of radiation. This shows the extent to which nuclear material can cause extreme damage to human environments and human lives. Additionally, Nuclear material can leave places deserted, and unfit to host any life at all, as nuclear radiation’s effects are devastating and the nuclear material cannot be removed from areas for many millennia. An example of a place that can no longer host any form of life without having adverse side effects on any living organisms is Chernobyl, as after the drastic nuclear failure, the Major Parties Involved and Their Views Democratic People’s Republic of Korea The Democratic people’s republic of Korea has been developing nuclear tools for many years now, and they have been doing so with the sole intention of attacking the United States of America and igniting a nuclear war, which could potentially disrupt the global ecosystems and result in the possible extinction of many species. The country has been testing nuclear material quite a lot as well, however, they haven’t faced any consequences for their extensive use of such weaponry, which can have severe impacts in the future if the people are effected by the nuclear material. Additionally, they have planned to ignite a nuclear war, which could end the human population, and it could simultaneously have drastic effects for the Earth’s environment. United Sates of America The united states of America are also a large developer in Nuclear weaponry, and have been doing its best to protect it from any harm that can be caused by nuclear material. An example of their Research Report | Page 3 of 11 ​ ​ th Dubai International Academy Model United Nations 2018| 10 ​ Annual Session ​ ​ ​ extensive care for their own safety is the deal with Iran. One of their rival countries, whereby they have signed a deal prohibiting Iran from producing Nuclear Material that can be weaponised. Simultaneously the USA have shut down parts of Iranian nuclear plants to prevent any weaponised nuclear material from being produced. The United States of America has also been a major user of nuclear weaponry in the past for example, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, using Nuclear bombs that contained uranium bullets. The United States of America also holds the largest number of nuclear power plants in the world (100 power plants), and this could result in large scale destruction if any disasters were to occur to any of the nuclear power plants. The United States of America also dropped the first ever Nuclear Bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, leaving the cities destroyed and killing many innocent men, women and children. Nevertheless, nuclear weaponry has not been used Iran Iran is also a large producer of nuclear material, and whilst it may only have 1 nuclear power plant, it can produce large-quantities of weaponised nuclear material, which is why it had signed the deal with the united states. The United Nations The United Nations has had various attempts at regulating nuclear activity. For instance, they have been able to identify the extremity of danger that nuclear weapons possess and have sought to eliminate such weapons since 1946, but still haven’t been able to do so. Due to this, many countries such as the US, India and Iran have used nuclear power to produce electricity and energy for the population of their countries, and in doing so, have prevented the elimination of nuclear weaponry and resources. They had also signed a treaty in 1996 preventing the use of nuclear tests in outer space, water and in the atmosphere, however after over 2 decades, it has still not been put to place, because countries such as the Democratic People’s republic of Korea are still testing nuclear weaponry on a daily basis, and are refusing to collaborate with the UN to abolish the use of such dangerous weapons. The Clamshell Alliance The clamshell is an anti-nuclear organisation which was founded in 1976. They conducted non-violent demonstrations throughout the 80’s and 90’s. The group grew larger, and thousands of people had joined it over time. Today, they work hard to stop nuclear reactors from being built, and they try their best to ensure that those that exist today aren’t causing any harm to the environment. As a Research Report | Page 4 of 11 ​ ​ th Dubai International Academy Model United Nations 2018| 10 ​ Annual Session ​ ​ ​ matter of fact, the clamshell alliance attempted to stop the delivery of the first nuclear reactor in New England, however they were kept off the streets by the police. Regardless, they continued to protest, and over the decades, the organisation has grown, and many members have been arrested for disobeying police officers and constantly protesting regarding the use of nuclear material in the United Kingdom Development of Issue/Timeline There have been many major acts that have been conducted in order to stop the use of nuclear weaponry and nuclear material in general, however, whilst all of them may not have been successful, they have all made some kind of impact in raising awareness or preventing the widespread use of nuclear weaponry.
Recommended publications
  • Ryflwl Enness Al Office REPORT on CRITICAL MASS CONFERENCE by Arnold Weissberg, October 16, 1978
    14 Charles Lane New York, N.Y. 10014 October 23, 1978 TO ORGANIZERS AND NATIONAL CO"ITTEE MEMBERS Dear Comrades, The attached report by Arnold Weissberg on the Critical Mass conference should be shared with comrades involved in antinuclear work. Information about activities around the Karen Silkwood week in November should be sent to The Militant. Comradely, ryflwl enness al Office REPORT ON CRITICAL MASS CONFERENCE by Arnold Weissberg, October 16, 1978 About 750 people turned out for the Critical Mass 78 conference in Washington D.C., October 6-8. Critical Mass is a Ralph Nader organization, started a couple of years ago, and it publishes a monthly newsletter called, Critical Mass. The head of Critical Mass, Richard Pollack, is an authoritative figure in the anti-nuclear movement. Pollack was a guest speaker at last spring's regional no-nukes conference in Tallahassee, Florida, and was a "resource person" at the I,ouisville conference in August. This was the moderate wing of the movement. The conference was dominated by environmental lawyers, 1obbyists, would-be congressional aides, past congressional aides, scientists, and "courtroom activists" from the kinds of groups that spend years litigating against nuclear plants. Most of them are foundation funded. There was almost no overlap that I noticed from the Mobilization for Survival conference in Des Moines, but there was a significant representation from the various alliances that met at Louisville. The registration fee was S15. It was an educational gathering rather than an action conference. There were several events of interest to us. We went assuming most of the conference would be one or another form of drumbeating for Jerry Brown for president.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers of Leo Goodman
    Leo Goodman A Register of His Papers in the Library of Congress Prepared by Melinda K. Friend with the assistance of Andrew Passett, Sherralyn McCoy, Amanda Perkins, Brian McGuire, and Paul Colton Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 1994 Contact information: http://lcweb.loc.gov/rr/mss/address.html Text converted and initial EAD tagging provided by Apex Data Services, 1999 January; encoding completed by Manuscript Division, 1999 2004-12-07 converted from EAD 1.0 to EAD 2002 Collection Summary Title: Papers of Leo Goodman Span Dates: 1913-1982 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1937-1970) ID No.: MSS60665 Creator: Goodman, Leo, 1910-1982 Extent: 86,000 items; 249 containers plus 2 oversize plus 1 classified; 124 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Repository: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Abstract: Labor union activist. Correspondence, memoranda, minutes, membership files, speeches and writings, subject files, appointment calendars, and other papers documenting Leo Goodman's career as a labor activist and lobbyist concerned with adequate and affordable housing and safety for workers in atomic energy, particularly as director, CIO National Housing Committee, and as secretary, AFL-CIO Atomic Energy Technical Committee. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. Names: Goodman, Leo, 1910-1982 Bogart, Lawrence Crago, George A. Goodman family Deverall, Richard L.-G. (Richard Lawrence-Grace), 1911- Foster, Ellery A. Jackson, Pat (Gardner) Johnsrud, Judith Ann Hays, 1931- Lorentz, Pare Monson, Astrid Monson, Donald S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: the Rise of the Antinuclear Power Movement: 1957 to 1989
    Chapter 3 THE RISE OF THE ANTINUCLEAR POWER MOVEMENT 1957 TO 1989 In this chapter I trace the development and circulation of antinuclear struggles of the last 40 years. What we will see is a pattern of new sectors of the class (e.g., women, native Americans, and Labor) joining the movement over the course of that long cycle of struggles. Those new sectors would remain autonomous, which would clearly place the movement within the autonomist Marxist model. Furthermore, it is precisely the widening of the class composition that has made the antinuclear movement the most successful social movement of the 1970s and 1980s. Although that widening has been impressive, as we will see in chapter 5, it did not go far enough, leaving out certain sectors of the class. Since its beginnings in the 1950s, opposition to the civilian nuclear power program has gone through three distinct phases of one cycle of struggles.(1) Phase 1 —1957 to 1967— was a period marked by sporadic opposition to specific nuclear plants. Phase 2 —1968 to 1975— was a period marked by a concern for the environmental impact of nuclear power plants, which led to a critique of all aspects of nuclear power. Moreover, the legal and the political systems were widely used to achieve demands. And Phase 3 —1977 to the present— has been a period marked by the use of direct action and civil disobedience by protesters whose goals have been to shut down all nuclear power plants. 3.1 The First Phase of the Struggles: 1957 to 1967 Opposition to nuclear energy first emerged shortly after the atomic bomb was built.
    [Show full text]
  • Al Giordano Collection Finding
    Special Collections and University Archives : University Libraries Al Giordano Collection 1969-1996 2 boxes (1 linear foot) Call no.: MS 604 Collection overview A native New Yorker born in 1959, Al Giordano was drawn into the antinuclear movement as a teenager, becoming an important organizer for the antinuclear and environmental movements. Giordano sharpened his organizing skills through a close association with Abbie Hoffman, with whom he often collaborated throughout the 1980s. Giordano has worked as a journalist for several decades, primarily with the alternative press, founding his own periodical Narco News in 2000 and the School of Authentic Journalism in 2002. He currently resides in Mexico City. The Giordano collection contains a miscellaneous assemblage of ephemera, publications and newspapers, reports, and a small quantity of correspondence, relating to antinuclear activism. See similar SCUA collections: Antinuclear Massachusetts (West) Background on Al Giordano The journalist Al Giordano was born in New York City ion Dec. 31, 1959, and was drawn into the antinuclear and environmental movements as a teenager. Living in Rowe, Mass., he became a successful grassroots organizer beginning with his work opposing the twin power plants Yankee Rowe and Vermont Yankee, which straddled the Vermont border. In 1981, Giordano met the radical and activist Abbie Hoffman, who became a mentor and close collaborator throughout the 1980s. Working within the political system to effect change. He was a key organizer and campaign director for the successful ballot measure in 1982 that required that proposals to construct new nuclear power plants or disposal facilities for low-level radioactive waste would be first vetted by the legislature and approved by a majority of voters, and worked throughout the country in antinuclear and environmental organizing for most of the decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    'RANDOM MURDER BY TECHNOLOGY': THE ROLE OF SCIENTIFIC AND BIOMEDICAL EXPERTS IN THE ANTI-NUCLEAR MOVEMENT, 1969 - 1992 LISA A. RUMIEL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY YORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, ONTARIO AUGUST 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-54104-3 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-54104-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trinity Reporter, Winter 2020
    The Westonian Magazine The Westonian The Trinity Reporter The Trinity The Trinity CELEBRATING CINESTUDIO Reporter The student-founded movie theater marks WINTER 2020 50 years on campus ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: Women at the Summit: 50 Years of Coeducation at Trinity College WINTER 2020 SPRING 2014 CONTENTS FEATURES 10 Women at the Summit: 50 Years of Coeducation at Trinity College Advocates for equality These alumni work to empower women 16 Celebrating Cinestudio The student-founded movie theater marks 50 years on campus 22 Breakthroughs in treating genetic illnesses D. Holmes Morton, M.D., IDP’79 dedicates career to Amish, Mennonite children 26 From student to staff member Young alumni pay it forward as Trinity employees 31 We are the Class of 2023 Catching up with six members of Trinity’s Bicentennial Class 38 The campaign for Trinity athletics Fundraising effort ‘will impact every student and team’ ON THE COVER A new, color-changing neon sign welcomes patrons to Cinestudio, the on-campus independent movie theater celebrating its 50th anniversary this year. PHOTO: HELDER MIRA DEPARTMENTS 03 ALONG THE WALK 06 VOLUNTEER SPOTLIGHT 07 AROUND HARTFORD 08 TRINITY TREASURE 43 CLASS NOTES 74 IN MEMORY 78 ALUMNI EVENTS 80 ENDNOTE THE TRINITY REPORTER Vol. 50, No. 2, Winter 2020 Published by the Office of Communications, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 06106. Postage paid at Hartford, Connecticut, and additional mailing offices. The Trinity Reporter is mailed to alumni, parents, faculty, staff, and friends of Trinity College without charge. All publication rights reserved, and contents may be reproduced or reprinted only by written permission of the editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear and Coal in the Postwar US Dissertation Presented in Partial
    Power From the Valley: Nuclear and Coal in the Postwar U.S. Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Megan Lenore Chew, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Steven Conn, Advisor Randolph Roth David Steigerwald Copyright by Megan Lenore Chew 2014 Abstract In the years after World War II, small towns, villages, and cities in the Ohio River Valley region of Ohio and Indiana experienced a high level of industrialization not seen since the region’s commercial peak in the mid-19th century. The development of industries related to nuclear and coal technologies—including nuclear energy, uranium enrichment, and coal-fired energy—changed the social and physical environments of the Ohio Valley at the time. This industrial growth was part of a movement to decentralize industry from major cities after World War II, involved the efforts of private corporations to sell “free enterprise” in the 1950s, was in some cases related to U.S. national defense in the Cold War, and brought some of the largest industrial complexes in the U.S. to sparsely populated places in the Ohio Valley. In these small cities and villages— including Madison, Indiana, Cheshire, Ohio, Piketon, Ohio, and Waverly, Ohio—the changes brought by nuclear and coal meant modern, enormous industry was taking the place of farms and cornfields. These places had been left behind by the growth seen in major metropolitan areas, and they saw the potential for economic growth in these power plants and related industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Howthe Right Union Activism
    luly7,1977l30d PEACE A FREEDOM THRU NONVIOLENT ACT'ON Howthe Right Watches the left Union Activism: The Green Bans Changes Prison Notes e I I I i ? why people protesting nuclear powergot ¡nuch a subject for day-to-day discus- t' so worked up about things like vege- òion. It was the fortnight-loirg occupa- tarian food, shoes, or segregation by tion ofthe armories that made this hap- sex. Such secondary issues simply rein- pen; a premature release would have- LETTERS forced (as Marty Jezer pointed out) the circumvented it. stereotypes held bv many Americans of It may be ourfaultthatthere is very the occüäiers as spoiled iriddle-class little awareness oftotal nonviolent non- hippies ùho were^out for a good time. cooperation as a pressure tactic-but the The camp¡ign at Seabrook may well pre- physical or non-physical, in achieving fronting us. He does not mention that They did nothing to extend the positive confusion in the armories over this issue vent the construction of a nuclear plant ãny intermediate end. This is not pos' many in the movement are concerned outreach effects ofthe occupation and of is multiplied many times by the confu- at thntsite; but at what cost? The tactic sible. All of Gandhi's campaigns were with conversion; an effort notjust to stop many groups' work over mâny years in sion outside. By hassling over petty plairned-that of occupying every bit of carefully built upon this principle. As and reverse the arms tace, but to solve buildiñg public consciousness on the issues, we perpetuate our isolation from landlo that construction is impossible- lóng as we seek to resolve conflict by many of the problems it either causes or nuclear oowef issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Energy Coalition Records Finding
    Special Collections and University Archives : University Libraries Alternative Energy Coalition Records 1960-1981 (Bulk: 1976-1980) 8 boxes (12 linear ft.) Call no.: MS 586 Collection overview A product of the vibrant, progressive political culture of western Massachusetts during the early 1970s, the Alternative Energy Coalition played a key role in the growth of antinuclear activism. In 1974, the AEC helped mobilize support for Sam Lovejoy after he sabotaged a weather tower erected by Northeast Utilities in Montague, Mass., in preparation for a proposed nuclear power plant, and they helped organize the drive for a referendum opposing not only the proposed plant in Montague, but existing plants in Rowe, Mass., and Vernon, Vt. Forming extensive connections with other antinuclear organizations, the AEC also became one of the organizations that united in 1976 to form the Clamshell Alliance, which made an art of mass civil disobedience. The AEC Records provide insight into grassroots activism of the 1970s and 1980s, galvanized by the seemingly unrestrained growth of the nuclear power industry. The records, emanating from the Hampshire County branch, contain both research materials used by the AEC and organizational and promotional materials produced by them, including publications, minutes of meetings, correspondence, and materials used during protests. Of particular interest are a thick suite of organizational and other information pertaining to the occupation of the Seabrook (N.H.) nuclear power plant in 1979 and minutes, notes, and other materials relating to the founding and early days of the Clamshell Alliance. The collection is closely related to the Antinuclear Collection (MS 547). See similar SCUA collections: Alternative energy Antinuclear Famous Long Ago Massachusetts (West) Peace Political activism Background on Alternative Energy Coalition On Washington's Birthday in 1974, a local organic farmer and member of the Montague Farm commune, Sam Lovejoy, committed an act of civil disobedience.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Socialism Seriously
    DRAFT Taking Socialism Seriously Edited by Anatole Anton and Richard Schmitt LEXINGTON BOOKS Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK DRAFT Contents Introduction vii Richard Schmitt 1 Twenty-Five Questions about Socialism 1 Richard Schmitt 2 In Defense of Marxism 23 Milton Fisk 3 But What Is Your Alternative?: Reflections on Having a “Plan” 47 David Schweickart 1 Romantic Couple Love, the Affective Economy, and a Socialist-Feminist Vision 67 Ann Ferguson 5 Socialism, Post-Capitalism and the Division of Labor 85 Anatole Anton 6 Socialism and Human Nature 97 Karsten J. Struhl 7 Solidarity: The Elusive Road to Socialism 135 Richard Schmitt 8 Is Socialism Relevant in the “Networked Information Age”?: A Critical Assessment of The Wealth of Networks 155 Tony Smith 9 Beyond Capitalism and Socialism 185 Richard Schmitt 10 Social Movements and Struggles for Socialism 211 John L. Hammond DRAFT TEN Social Movements and Struggles for Socialism John L. Hammond [10.0] Social movements are the means by which masses of oppressed people struggle for social change. Relatively powerless people can amass and accumulate power, challenge their subordination, and win concessions from or overthrew existing power structures. The large numbers and strong commitment of participants can sometimes compensate for their lack of power. But they do more than struggle for power. They empower the participants themselves, create collective consciousness and organiza- tion, and shape the culture of the society in which they act. Participation in a social movement is a collective activity and thus is itself part of the preparation for life under socialism. [10.1] In this paper I examine the ways in which social movements can con- tribute to the struggle for socialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Mss 006 Ferry
    RUTH LILLY SPECIAL COLLECTIONS AND ARCHIVES Carol Bernstein Ferry and W. H. Ferry Papers, 1971-1997 Mss 006 Carol Bernstein Ferry and W.H. Ferry Papers, 1971-1997 Mss 006 22.4 c.f. (22 cartons and 1 document box) ABSTRACT Carol Bernstein Ferry and the late W. H. (Ping) Ferry were social change philanthropists who gave away a substantial part of their personal wealth to progressive social change groups, activities, and activists concentrating generally in the areas of war, racism, poverty, and injustice. The Ferrys were also board members of the DJB Foundation, established by Carol’s first husband, Daniel J. Bernstein, which focused its giving in similar areas. The papers, 1971-1996, document the individuals, organizations, and activities the Ferrys supported with their donations. ACCESS This collection is open to the public without restriction. The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. PREFERRED CITATION Cite as: Carol Bernstein Ferry and W. H. Ferry Papers, 1971-1997, Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, University Library, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis ACQUISITION Presented by Carol Bernstein Ferry and W. H. Ferry, December 1993. A93-89, A96-33 Processed by Brenda L. Burk and Danielle Macsay, February, 1998. Ferry Finding Aid - page 2 HISTORY Carol Bernstein Ferry was born Carol Underwood in 1924 in upstate New York and grew up in Portland, Maine. She attended a private girls’ school and graduated from Wells College, a small woman’s college near Auburn, New York, in 1945. She moved to New York City in 1946 and worked as a copy editor and proofreader, eventually freelancing in that capacity for McGraw- Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Ambitious Us Subnational Climate Initiatives: Embracing Dignity and the Tradition of Civic Engagement
    BUILDING AMBITIOUS US SUBNATIONAL CLIMATE INITIATIVES: EMBRACING DIGNITY AND THE TRADITION OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Liberal Studies By Cyd Slayton, M.F.A Georgetown University Washington, D.C. April 2018 Copyright 2018 by Cyd Slayton All Rights Reserved ii BUILDING AMBITIOUS US SUBNATIONAL CLIMATE INITIATIVES: EMBRACING DIGNITY AND THE TRADITION OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT Cyd Slayton, M.F.A. DLS Chair: Thomas Kerch, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The human activity of emitting greenhouse gasses (GHGs) is contributing to the intensification of extreme weather, according to nearly all climate scientists. Already, atmospheric concentrations of the three most heat-trapping greenhouse gasses (GHGs)— carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide—are “unprecedented for at least 800,000 years.”1 As a result, heat waves, droughts, floods, cyclones, wildfires, and rising seas are more frequent and powerful. While the planet will survive the climate catastrophes, a destabilized atmosphere threatens all species, including our own. Over the past 25 years, total GHG emissions have continued to rise, despite international and bilateral climate treaties. Generally, the US has refused to ratify treaties that appear to impinge on national sovereignty, including the Kyoto Protocol with its “top 1 IPCC Working Groups I, II and III, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report , Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (Geneva: IPCC, 2014), 4, accessed March 2, 2018, https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment- report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf.
    [Show full text]