DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE National Technical Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. DE81 028818 HIGH LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL: INFORMATION EXCHANGE AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION f I S.G. Hadden, et al U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. July 1981 U.S. DEPARTMENTOF COMMERCE National Technical Information Service DE81 028818 Q High Level Nuclear "Waste Disposal: Information Exchange and Conflict Resolution by Susan G. Hadden James R. Chiles Paul Anaejionu Karl J. Cerny PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert D. Smith PROJECT COORDINATOR Gary W. Hamilton Prepared for Texas EnerK~' and Natural Resources Adt'/sory Council Funded, in part, by a gant from the U.S. Department of Ener~' NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE U.S. D[pJRII,tENI OF CON~dE;~CE ~lillIG~l[I.O. Vk i~lGl Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the Texas Energy and Natural Resources Advisory Council or the U.S. Department of Energy _. !' rLT. ALL PROGRAMS AND INFORMATION OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND THE TEXA.5 ENERGY AND NATURAL RE.SOURCES ADVISORY COUNCIL ARE AVAILABLE V,'ITHOUT REGARD TO RACE, ETHNIC ORIGIN, RELAGION, SEX, AND AGE. II READER'S GUIDE This study provides background information for local, state, and federal decision-makers who are responsible for establishing the frameworks within which the qlP~' high-level radioactive waste (HLW) disposal issue will be resolved. The authors have attempted to develop balanced presentations exploring the pros and cons of the various facets of this issue. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommenda- tions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department o[ Energy or the Texas Energy and Natural Resources Advisory Council. The research presented here was conceived as an exploration of the interactions among parties involved in the resolution of the HLW disposal issue. Because ol the major dilferences in the nature of the interactions between levels of government, on the one hand, and between government and the public, on the other hand, this study is divided into two primary areas -- public participation and intergovernmental rela° tions. These areas are further divided into theoretical and practical considerations. The theoretical discussions generally present basic history and background) explicate fundamental principles and problems, and suggest useful institutional mechanisms. The practical presentations include discussions of experiences and case histories of issues similar to the HL~ disposal issue and suggestions for avoiding some of the pitfalls identified by those past experiences. The format ol the paper reflects the divisions explained above as well as the interaction of the various authors. Public participation is addressed from a theoretical perspective in Part 2. In Parl 3 an essentially pragmatic approach is taken drawing on experiences from similar exercises. These two aspects of the s~Jdy are presented in separate parts because the authors worked largely independently. Intergovernmental relations is treated in Part ~. The treatment is organized ~s iii two Sections of Part 4 to reflect the authors' close interaction which yielded a more integrated treatment of the theoretical and practical aspects o[ intergovernmental relations. Detailed recommendations and conclusions appear in the final subsections of Parts 2, 3, and 4. Part 5, Summary and Conclusions, does not reiterate the detailed conclusions and recommendations presented in previous parts but rather expresses some general perceptions with respect to the high-level waste disposal issue. A brief review of the Table of Contents will assist in visualizing the detailed format of this study and in identifying the portions of greatest relevance to specific questions. A detailed Subject Index and an Acronyl~ Index have been inclLrded for the reader's convenience. The scope of the HLW disposal issue is much broader than can be treated by any single study. Although many aspects of the issue have been treated here, many others were neglected. Cost issues were largely ignored. The timing of participation programs and information were mentioned but not treated in detail° Potential delays resulting from more extensive interactions also merit care[u[ study. Further analysis of some of the topics addressed in this paper and studies o£ other areas not treated will be required to fully characterize the institutional problems and possible solutions. Nevertheless, the subjects within the scope of this study have been addressed in depth, and the final document does represent a significant contribution to the body of knowledge required for resoluuon of the high-level nuclear waste disposal issue. iv ACKNO~LEDG EM ENTS Throughout the preparation of this study, the individuals involved have fulfilled ~he responsibilities expected of them and then have generously contributed that extra 9 effort required to transform a good product into an excellent document. Assembling a more capable, conscientious, and cooperative group would, at best, be extremely difficult. Sincere appreciation is expressed to the researchers who authored the text. Professor Susan G. Hadden is a member of the faculty of the Lyndon ESaines 3ohnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin. 3ames R. Chiles is now Special Research Assistant to the Alaska Statehood Commission in Fairbanks. He was engaged in freelance writing in Austin, Texas after graduating cure laude from Harvard College and with honors from the University of Texas Law School. Professor Paul Anaejionu is a member of the faculty of the Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin. Karl J. Cerny is a doctoral candidate specializing in intergovernmental relations in the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin. The excellent text prepared by these authors is the core of this study and any praise garnered by this document is theirs. The coordination of the preparation of the separate manuscripts was handled by Gary W. Hamilton. He was also responsible for preliminary editing to nninirnize redundancy and to integrate more effectively the various parts. The following individuals reviewed and offered comments on various drafts of this study: Curt Carlson, DOE Regional Representative, Region Vl; Ted Taylor, Policy Analysis Division Director, Texas Energy and Natural Resources Advisory Council (TENRAC); and Mil~on Holloway, Execu~-ive Director, TENI<AC. Eddie Selig coordinated the special services and prin~ing for this volume. Layne Jackson designed and executed the cover and title page. Amanda P.. Mas=erson edited the final text and prepared the indexes. Special thanks is extended to Christine Dominguez who ior months has patiently prepared countless revisions of every part ol this document and who painstakingly prepared the intricate [igures and tables. Most of the funding for this study was provided by the Department of Energy, National Waste Terminal Storage Program Office, Columbus, Ohio under Grant No. DE-FG-97-79ETO~6608. Robert D. Smith Project Director vi CONTENTS Pa e xi List o[ Figures xii List of Tables El Executive Summary El History and Overview El Public Participation E4 Intergovernmental Relations PART 1 - HISTORY AND OVERVIEW I. Introduction 2. Consultation and Concurrence 2. I Background l 3 2.2 Consultation 3 2.3 Concurrence tt 2.~ State Planning Council on Radioactive Waste Management 3. Summary and Conclusions References PART 2 - DESIGNING A CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROGRAM FOR SELECTING A NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE 1. Introduction 2. History and Purposes of Citizen Participation 2.1 Democratic Theory 2.2 Development of Groups 2.3 Citizen Participation Trends 2.3.1 Involvement of Previously Unrepresented Groups 9 10 2.3.2 Open Government 2.3.3 Effects of New Technologies 10 II 2.4 Purposes of Participation 2.5 Costs and Benefits of Citizen Participation 13 15 2.6 Summary 15 3. Information for Public Participation 16 3.1 Types of Inlormation 3.2 Role of Substantive Information in Participation 17 3.3 In_formation About Risk and Probabilities IS 3.3.1 Lack of Knowledge 20 20 3.3.2 Use of Probabiliszic Data 3.3.3 Assessment ol Risk 21 vii I CONTENTS (continued) Page 3.4 Resolution of the Information Problem 23 4. Design of a Participation Program 24 4.1 Purposes and Mechanisms 24 4.1.1 Inlormation Provision 24 llp 4.1.2 Information Collection 27 4.1.3 Conflict Resolution 28 4.1.4 Citizen Input Improvement 29 4.1.5 Other Purposes 30 4.2 Designation ol Participants 30 4.2.1 Individuals and Groups 30 4.2.2 "fhe Role of States 33 4.2.3 Affected Parties 33 q.3 Timing of Participation 36 4.4 Monetary Costs 40 4.5 Additional Proposals 40 4.5.1 Compensating Local Residents 42 4.5.2 A Federalist Strategy: Designing for Non-Concurrence 43 4.5.3 Funding of Technical Staff 45 4.6 Summary 46 5. Conclusions 46 5.1 Reasons for Citizen Participation 47 5.2 The Unalterable Opposition Assumption 48 5.3 Evaluation of the Present Plan 50 5.4 Requisites for a Participation Program 50 5.5 Problems with Proposed Process 51 5.6 Conclusion 51 Appendix 53 Description of Participation Mechanisms 53 Description of Functions 56 Participazion Techniques 57 References 60 PART 3 - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION iN THE SITING OF A NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE FACILITY 63 1. Introduction 63 1.1 General Statement 63 1.2 The Purposes o£ Public Partic':.pazion 65 1.3 Parties 69 viii CONTENTS (continued) 2. The "Public": A Question of Spokesmen 70 2.1 Eligibility to Participate 73 3. Modes of Participation 77 3.1 Information Exchange 78 3.1.1 Sources of the Public's Information (Passive Public) 79 3.1.2 Information Return from Public (Active Public) 87 3.2 Power Balancing Between Government and an Aggressive Public 88 3.2.1 Use of the Courts 88 3.2.2 Civil Disobedience 9O 4.
Recommended publications
  • Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Sustainability: HR’S Leadership Role SHRM-Morris County Chapter – Brian J

    Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Sustainability: HR’S Leadership Role SHRM-Morris County Chapter – Brian J

    Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Sustainability: HR’s Leadership Role SHRM-Morris County Chapter – Brian J. Glade, SPHR, GPHR – February 11, 2009 ©SHRM 2009 CSR and Business Sustainability: Defining the Terms CSR • Used since the 1970s to denote ethical and socially responsible business behavior Sustainability/Business Sustainability • Dates back to 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development • Combines traditional CSR concept with longer-term renewable approach to business practices CSR-Business Sustainability • Today, the two terms are used interchangeably and are defined by World Council for Sustainable Business as: “Contributing to sustainable development by working to improve the quality of life for employees, their families, the local community and stakeholders up and down the supply chain” ©SHRM 2009 2 CSR and Business Sustainability: HR’s Leadership Role Today’s Agenda • Evolution of CSR/Business Sustainability • Triple Bottom Line • SHRM’s 2007 CSR Pilot Study • HR’s Leadership Role in CSR/Business Sustainability • Barack Obama: our “Green” President ©SHRM 2009 3 CSR/Sustainability Evolution: Early Pioneers Founded in 1978 with a social purpose Shares rewards with its employees and the community Sources ingredients from socially conscious suppliers. In 1992, first U.S. public company to sign onto the CERES Principles to protect the environment. ©SHRM 2009 4 CSR/Sustainability Evolution: Early Pioneers UK cosmetics company founded in 1976 with a commitment to sell products not tested on animals. Company went on to support environmental causes, HIV/AIDS awareness, human and animal rights, and campaigns against domestic violence. In the early 1990s, sponsored employee trips to work in orphanages in Romania, raising international awareness of the poor conditions of the facilities and the children’s health.
  • Ryflwl Enness Al Office REPORT on CRITICAL MASS CONFERENCE by Arnold Weissberg, October 16, 1978

    Ryflwl Enness Al Office REPORT on CRITICAL MASS CONFERENCE by Arnold Weissberg, October 16, 1978

    14 Charles Lane New York, N.Y. 10014 October 23, 1978 TO ORGANIZERS AND NATIONAL CO"ITTEE MEMBERS Dear Comrades, The attached report by Arnold Weissberg on the Critical Mass conference should be shared with comrades involved in antinuclear work. Information about activities around the Karen Silkwood week in November should be sent to The Militant. Comradely, ryflwl enness al Office REPORT ON CRITICAL MASS CONFERENCE by Arnold Weissberg, October 16, 1978 About 750 people turned out for the Critical Mass 78 conference in Washington D.C., October 6-8. Critical Mass is a Ralph Nader organization, started a couple of years ago, and it publishes a monthly newsletter called, Critical Mass. The head of Critical Mass, Richard Pollack, is an authoritative figure in the anti-nuclear movement. Pollack was a guest speaker at last spring's regional no-nukes conference in Tallahassee, Florida, and was a "resource person" at the I,ouisville conference in August. This was the moderate wing of the movement. The conference was dominated by environmental lawyers, 1obbyists, would-be congressional aides, past congressional aides, scientists, and "courtroom activists" from the kinds of groups that spend years litigating against nuclear plants. Most of them are foundation funded. There was almost no overlap that I noticed from the Mobilization for Survival conference in Des Moines, but there was a significant representation from the various alliances that met at Louisville. The registration fee was S15. It was an educational gathering rather than an action conference. There were several events of interest to us. We went assuming most of the conference would be one or another form of drumbeating for Jerry Brown for president.
  • Papers of Leo Goodman

    Papers of Leo Goodman

    Leo Goodman A Register of His Papers in the Library of Congress Prepared by Melinda K. Friend with the assistance of Andrew Passett, Sherralyn McCoy, Amanda Perkins, Brian McGuire, and Paul Colton Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 1994 Contact information: http://lcweb.loc.gov/rr/mss/address.html Text converted and initial EAD tagging provided by Apex Data Services, 1999 January; encoding completed by Manuscript Division, 1999 2004-12-07 converted from EAD 1.0 to EAD 2002 Collection Summary Title: Papers of Leo Goodman Span Dates: 1913-1982 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1937-1970) ID No.: MSS60665 Creator: Goodman, Leo, 1910-1982 Extent: 86,000 items; 249 containers plus 2 oversize plus 1 classified; 124 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Repository: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Abstract: Labor union activist. Correspondence, memoranda, minutes, membership files, speeches and writings, subject files, appointment calendars, and other papers documenting Leo Goodman's career as a labor activist and lobbyist concerned with adequate and affordable housing and safety for workers in atomic energy, particularly as director, CIO National Housing Committee, and as secretary, AFL-CIO Atomic Energy Technical Committee. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. Names: Goodman, Leo, 1910-1982 Bogart, Lawrence Crago, George A. Goodman family Deverall, Richard L.-G. (Richard Lawrence-Grace), 1911- Foster, Ellery A. Jackson, Pat (Gardner) Johnsrud, Judith Ann Hays, 1931- Lorentz, Pare Monson, Astrid Monson, Donald S.
  • Illustration: Kah Yangni Design: Cary Design Group

    Illustration: Kah Yangni Design: Cary Design Group

    Illustration: Kah Yangni Design: Cary Design Group Dear friend, What a year it’s been. I hope this report finds you thriving, growing, and staying well. As I spoke with members like you over this turbulent year, I was struck by how different all our circumstances and experiences have been—and yet how most of us were grappling with similar, big emotions: grief, rage, and hope. Sometimes all three emotions in a single day, or even a single hour. Which, to me, is a clear sign of our shared humanity. I’ve also been struck by how many members like you, as well as our staff, board, and allies, have approached this season of change in visionary ways. Both the COVID-19 pandemic and the uprising for Black liberation have made it clear that all of us who hope and work for a better world must recognize the ways in which all of our struggles and issues are connected. This moment requires us to truly understand and challenge the roots of the economic and social systems we live within: anti-Blackness and systemic racism, which are inseparable from brutal, extractive capitalism. And it requires action and solutions that are larger and more encompassing than any single organization and any single issue. Corporate Accountability has always seen our work of stopping life-threatening abuses by corporations as integral to creating the systemic change we need. But we are called in this moment to be more explicit about how this work is specifically connected to ending systemic racism. For example, our campaigning to make Big Polluters pay is not just about taking fossil fuel corporations to court.
  • Chapter 3: the Rise of the Antinuclear Power Movement: 1957 to 1989

    Chapter 3: the Rise of the Antinuclear Power Movement: 1957 to 1989

    Chapter 3 THE RISE OF THE ANTINUCLEAR POWER MOVEMENT 1957 TO 1989 In this chapter I trace the development and circulation of antinuclear struggles of the last 40 years. What we will see is a pattern of new sectors of the class (e.g., women, native Americans, and Labor) joining the movement over the course of that long cycle of struggles. Those new sectors would remain autonomous, which would clearly place the movement within the autonomist Marxist model. Furthermore, it is precisely the widening of the class composition that has made the antinuclear movement the most successful social movement of the 1970s and 1980s. Although that widening has been impressive, as we will see in chapter 5, it did not go far enough, leaving out certain sectors of the class. Since its beginnings in the 1950s, opposition to the civilian nuclear power program has gone through three distinct phases of one cycle of struggles.(1) Phase 1 —1957 to 1967— was a period marked by sporadic opposition to specific nuclear plants. Phase 2 —1968 to 1975— was a period marked by a concern for the environmental impact of nuclear power plants, which led to a critique of all aspects of nuclear power. Moreover, the legal and the political systems were widely used to achieve demands. And Phase 3 —1977 to the present— has been a period marked by the use of direct action and civil disobedience by protesters whose goals have been to shut down all nuclear power plants. 3.1 The First Phase of the Struggles: 1957 to 1967 Opposition to nuclear energy first emerged shortly after the atomic bomb was built.
  • From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability

    From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability

    Hastings Business Law Journal Volume 16 Number 1 Winter 2020 Article 3 Winter 2020 From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability Min Yan Daoning Zhang Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Min Yan and Daoning Zhang, From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability, 16 Hastings Bus. L.J. 43 (2020). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol16/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Business Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 - YAN _ZHANG - V9 - KC - 10.27.19.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 11/15/2019 11:11 AM From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability Min Yan* and Daoning Zhang** I. INTRODUCTION The concept of corporate responsibility or corporate social responsibility (“CSR”) keeps evolving since it appeared. The emphasis was first placed on business people’s social conscience rather than on the company itself, which was well reflected by Howard Bowen’s landmark book, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman.1 Then CSR was defined as responsibilities to society, which extends beyond economic and legal obligations by corporations.2 Since then, corporate responsibility is thought to begin where the law ends. 3 In other words, the concept of social responsibility largely excludes legal obedience from the concept of social responsibility. An analysis of 37 of the most used definitions of CSR also shows “voluntary” as one of the most common dimensions.4 Put differently, corporate responsibility reflects the belief that corporations have duties beyond generating profits for their shareholders.
  • Institutions, Organizations and Individuals Advocating for Corporate Accountability Condemn Chevron's Retaliatory Attacks on H

    Institutions, Organizations and Individuals Advocating for Corporate Accountability Condemn Chevron's Retaliatory Attacks on H

    Institutions, Organizations and Individuals Advocating for Corporate Accountability Condemn Chevron’s Retaliatory Attacks on Human Rights and Corporate Accountability Advocates and See it as a Serious Threat to Open Society and Due Process of Law January 23, 2014 - We, the undersigned organizations and individuals, condemn the actions by Chevron in its efforts to silence critics and ignore a $9.5 billion judgment against it for environmental damage in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Chevron’s actions set a dangerous precedent and represent a growing and serious threat to the ability of civil society to hold corporations accountable for their misdeeds around the world. Since Chevron launched its attack on those who have been working for decades to pressure the company to clean up the environmental damage caused by its operations in the Ecuadorian Amazon, independent journalists have been forced to turn over their material and nonprofit watchdog groups have faced massive legal actions designed to cripple their ability to work and undermine their ability to grow support for their efforts. Attacks Free Speech In a move opposed by The New York Times, ABC, CBS, NBC, Dow Jones, the Associated Press, the Hearst Newspapers, the Daily News, and the Gannett Company, Chevron used its legal might to launch a major threat to independent journalism when it won a decision to force documentary producer and director Joe Berlinger to turn over to Chevron more than 600 hours of raw footage. Chevron has also targeted nonprofit environmental and indigenous rights groups and individual activists with subpoenas designed to cripple their effectiveness and chill their speech.
  • What Is Corporate Accountability?

    What Is Corporate Accountability?

    WHAT IS CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY? BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Since the 1990s, the world has witnessed the growing importance and visibility of a range of initiatives led by businesses, social organisations and governments, with the stated aim of pressuring companies to behave in more socially responsible and accountable ways. This is a new development for many parts of the business world. Previously, the state (or government) was assumed to lead standard setting and behavioural norms for businesses in relation to most categories of stakeholders. When community organisations and interest groups wanted to change business behaviour, they focussed on changing the law. From the 1990s the focus changed, reflected in the emergence of new alliances and regimes of influence over business norms, linking together consumers, communities, workers and producers. What is the difference between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate accountability? Corporate responsibility, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate accountability are sometimes confused or seen to be synonymous. However, corporate responsibility and corporate accountability are typically distinguished from one another along several lines. Corporate responsibility in its broadest sense refers to varied practices that reflect the belief that corporations have responsibilities beyond generating profit for their shareholders. Such responsibilities include the negative duty to refrain from harm caused to the environment, individuals or communities, and sometimes also positive duties to protect society and the environment, for example protecting human rights of workers and communities affected by business activities. Such responsibilities are generally considered to extend not only to direct social and environmental impacts of business activity, but also to more indirect effects resulting from relationships with business partners, such as those involved in global production chains.
  • Al Giordano Collection Finding

    Al Giordano Collection Finding

    Special Collections and University Archives : University Libraries Al Giordano Collection 1969-1996 2 boxes (1 linear foot) Call no.: MS 604 Collection overview A native New Yorker born in 1959, Al Giordano was drawn into the antinuclear movement as a teenager, becoming an important organizer for the antinuclear and environmental movements. Giordano sharpened his organizing skills through a close association with Abbie Hoffman, with whom he often collaborated throughout the 1980s. Giordano has worked as a journalist for several decades, primarily with the alternative press, founding his own periodical Narco News in 2000 and the School of Authentic Journalism in 2002. He currently resides in Mexico City. The Giordano collection contains a miscellaneous assemblage of ephemera, publications and newspapers, reports, and a small quantity of correspondence, relating to antinuclear activism. See similar SCUA collections: Antinuclear Massachusetts (West) Background on Al Giordano The journalist Al Giordano was born in New York City ion Dec. 31, 1959, and was drawn into the antinuclear and environmental movements as a teenager. Living in Rowe, Mass., he became a successful grassroots organizer beginning with his work opposing the twin power plants Yankee Rowe and Vermont Yankee, which straddled the Vermont border. In 1981, Giordano met the radical and activist Abbie Hoffman, who became a mentor and close collaborator throughout the 1980s. Working within the political system to effect change. He was a key organizer and campaign director for the successful ballot measure in 1982 that required that proposals to construct new nuclear power plants or disposal facilities for low-level radioactive waste would be first vetted by the legislature and approved by a majority of voters, and worked throughout the country in antinuclear and environmental organizing for most of the decade.
  • Proquest Dissertations

    Proquest Dissertations

    'RANDOM MURDER BY TECHNOLOGY': THE ROLE OF SCIENTIFIC AND BIOMEDICAL EXPERTS IN THE ANTI-NUCLEAR MOVEMENT, 1969 - 1992 LISA A. RUMIEL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY YORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, ONTARIO AUGUST 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-54104-3 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-54104-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
  • As Corporate Just Deserts

    As Corporate Just Deserts

    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 31 1998 "Crimtorts" as Corporate Just Deserts Thomas Koenig Northeastern University Michael Rustad Suffolk University Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Legal Remedies Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Thomas Koenig & Michael Rustad, "Crimtorts" as Corporate Just Deserts, 31 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 289 (1998). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol31/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "CRIMTORTS" AS CORPORATE JUST DESERTSt Thomas Koenig* and Michael Rustad** Just as Grant Gilmore described "contorts"that lie on the borderline between contractand tort law, the authors coin the term "crimtort"to identify the expanding common ground between criminal and tort law. Although the concept of crimtort can be broadly applied to many areas of the law, this Article focuses on the primary crimtort rem- edy-punitive damages. The deterrentpower ofpunitive damages lies in the wealth-calibrationof the defendant'spunishment. For corpora- tions this means that punitive damages will reflect the firm's net income or net worth. The theoretical danger is thatjuries will abuse wealth by redistributingcorporate assets in disregardof the purposes of civil punishment. 7b support their argument that wealth is not be- ing widely misused, the authors present an empirical study of a decade of crimtort cases in which federal appeals courts upheld puni- tive damages of $1 million or more.
  • The Trinity Reporter, Winter 2020

    The Trinity Reporter, Winter 2020

    The Westonian Magazine The Westonian The Trinity Reporter The Trinity The Trinity CELEBRATING CINESTUDIO Reporter The student-founded movie theater marks WINTER 2020 50 years on campus ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: Women at the Summit: 50 Years of Coeducation at Trinity College WINTER 2020 SPRING 2014 CONTENTS FEATURES 10 Women at the Summit: 50 Years of Coeducation at Trinity College Advocates for equality These alumni work to empower women 16 Celebrating Cinestudio The student-founded movie theater marks 50 years on campus 22 Breakthroughs in treating genetic illnesses D. Holmes Morton, M.D., IDP’79 dedicates career to Amish, Mennonite children 26 From student to staff member Young alumni pay it forward as Trinity employees 31 We are the Class of 2023 Catching up with six members of Trinity’s Bicentennial Class 38 The campaign for Trinity athletics Fundraising effort ‘will impact every student and team’ ON THE COVER A new, color-changing neon sign welcomes patrons to Cinestudio, the on-campus independent movie theater celebrating its 50th anniversary this year. PHOTO: HELDER MIRA DEPARTMENTS 03 ALONG THE WALK 06 VOLUNTEER SPOTLIGHT 07 AROUND HARTFORD 08 TRINITY TREASURE 43 CLASS NOTES 74 IN MEMORY 78 ALUMNI EVENTS 80 ENDNOTE THE TRINITY REPORTER Vol. 50, No. 2, Winter 2020 Published by the Office of Communications, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 06106. Postage paid at Hartford, Connecticut, and additional mailing offices. The Trinity Reporter is mailed to alumni, parents, faculty, staff, and friends of Trinity College without charge. All publication rights reserved, and contents may be reproduced or reprinted only by written permission of the editor.