DOCSLIB.ORG

14. Nancy Folbre[Nancy Folbre] Greed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
14. Nancy Folbre[Nancy Folbre] Greed GREED,LUST &GENDER This page intentionally left blank GREED,LUST &GENDER a history of economic ideas nancy folbre 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York q Nancy Folbre 2009 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Clays Ltd., St Ives Plc ISBN 978 0 19 923842 2 13579108642 To A. M. C. W., open minded economist with a smattering of divinity This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The ideas developed here grew, in a topsy turvy way, out of an article I co authored with Heidi Hartmann, entitled ‘‘The Rhetoric of Self Interest: Ideology of Gender in Economic Theory,’’ presented at a conference memorably attended by Robert Coats, Arjo Klamer, Donald McCloskey, and Robert Solow, and published in the conference volume The Conse quences of Economic Rhetoric in 1988. I cannot accurately remember or adequately thank all those who have helped me over the last twenty years, but offer a brief chronology of gratitude that begins with institutional thanks. A generous fellowship from the French American Foundation that sent me to Paris in 1995 1996 offered me the opportunity to learn more about French history. Jean Heffer of the E´ cole des Hautes E´ tudes en Sciences Sociales served as a superb host and Linda Koike as logistical problem solver par excellence. A five year Fellowship from the McArthur Foundation in 1998 gave me the luxury of devoting time to the history of economic ideas. A position as visiting Adjunct Professor at the Social and Political Theory Program Research School of Social Sciences at Australian National University widened my disciplinary horizons. A fellowship at the Russell Sage Foun dation in 2005 2006 helped me expand my ideas. A Samuel F. Conti Fellowship from my own institution, the University of Massachusetts Amherst, facilitated my final revisions. My friendship with Anthony Waterman, to whom this book is dedicated, has proved one of the most rewarding aspects of this adventure. Despite strong disagreement with many of my specific arguments, Anthony consist ently provided warm, supportive, detailed, and extremely knowledgeable feedback. His efforts improved my own intellectual capabilities, as well as the manuscript, in profound ways. Deirdre McCloskey also offered generous viii acknowledgments encouragement and assistance animated by her love of bourgeois virtues. Thank you, friends, for strengthening my faith in the virtues of academic debate. The International Association for Feminist Economics (IAFFE) and its journal, Feminist Economics, created a rich new intellectual space for the development of my ideas. I greatly appreciate the largely anonymous efforts of members, officers, editors, and contributors. My close personal and professional relationships with feminist scholars Paula England and Julie Nelson informs everything I write. I’m grateful for their direct and indirect contributions to this final product. Robert Goodin of the Research School of Social Sciences at Australian National University also gave me invaluable feedback and encouragement. I thank Robert Dimand, Evelyn Forget, and Janet Seiz for attending a meeting (along with Anthony Waterman) to discuss an earlier version of this manuscript in San Antonio, Texas in 2002. Conversations with Ulla Grapard and Edith Kuiper as well as their pioneering work in the history of feminist economics, contributed to the development of my ideas. My friend and colleague in Economics at the University of Massachusetts, Carol Heim, gave me the benefit of her broad knowledge of economic history and careful attention to detail. My colleague in English at this university, Nicholas Bromell, offered many discerning comments and suggestions. Others who offered comments and criticisms on specific chapters include Elisabetta Addis, Gerald Friedman, Susan Himmelweit, and Wally Seccombe. Over the last two years I have used this manuscript in a writing course on the History of Economic Thought, asking students for feedback on my work in return for mine on theirs. I hope we are all better writers as a result. Thanks to my students in Spring 2007: Dalyah Assil, Scott Babineau, John Barrington, Rick Bihrle, Alex Brotschi, Whitney Dorin, Charles Forsyth, Jacob Gordon, Daniel Kelly, Samir Khan, Nathan Kollett, Andrew Mackay, Mitchell Markowitz, Paul Piquette, Tomer Radbil, Michael Sullivan, and Nicholas Swaim. Thanks to those in Fall 2007: James Burbidge, Matthew Donalds, Matthew Greenstein, Sami Korna, Betty Mac, Ali McGuirk, Greg Michalopoulos, Sean Monroe, Michael Monsegur, Huy Nguyen, Matthew Radowicz, Mark Rovenskiy, Alexis Santiago, Christina Shuker, Zach Simmons, Matthew Spurlock, Thien Tran, Alex Weinstein, and Amanda Wong. acknowledgments ix My editor at Oxford University Press, Sarah Caro, always responded smartly to my questions and concerns and nudged me in the right directions. The memory of my good friend Helen Smith, superb writer, editor, and independent intellectual, sustained my efforts. My husband Robert Dworak indulged many of my sins. Thanks to all. While every effort was made to contact the copyright holders of material in this book, there are instances where we have been unable to do so. If the copyright holders contact the author or publisher we will be pleased to rectify any omission at the earliest opportunity. This page intentionally left blank TABLEOFCONTENTS Epigraph xvii Introduction xix 1. The Eye of the Needle 1 Liberation 2 Damnation 4 Patriarchal Feudalism 5 The Growth of Markets 7 Patriarchal Ideology 8 Markets and Mentalite´s 11 Regulation 13 2. The Springs of Desire 18 The Commonwealth of Fathers 19 Patriarchy Defended 21 Patriarchy Modified 22 A Supremacy to Themselves 25 (Re)production 27 Sexual Efficiency 29 Contractual Power 30 3. Defining Virtues 35 The Ancient Regime 36 Age and Gender, Love and Sex 38 The Rebellion of the Harem 39 The Climate of Reason 41 xii table of contents Self, Love, God, and Nature 43 Commerce and Virtue 44 Human Nature 45 4. Free Trade but Not Free Love 49 Humanism 50 Selfishness Celebrated 51 Sexual Regulation 54 Love Thyself 55 The Butcher, the Baker, and the Wife 58 The Balance 61 5. The Limits of Affection 67 Sweet Commerce 68 The Fraternal Compromise 70 Slavery and Evil 72 Feminism and Abolition 75 Observers from Abroad 77 Democracy in America 78 6. The Perfectibility of Man 84 Progress? 85 Of Bread and Cake 88 Interests and the Revolution 89 Malevolence Theorized 93 Timid Egoism 95 7. The Greatest Happiness 99 Chivalry versus Calculation 100 The Vindication 101 Godwin’s Enquiry 103 The Greatest Good 105 Gendered Virtues 108 8. Self-love, Triumphant 111 Poor Relief 112 The Essay on Population 113 Against Benevolence 116 table of contents xiii The Improper Arts 117 Malthus and Women 120 Enlightenment Redux 121 9. Production and Reproduction 125 Patriarchal Capitalism 126 The Rise of Individual Occupations 128 The Labor Theory of Value 130 Child Labor and the Poor Laws 132 Fertility and Out of Wedlock Births 134 The Wages of Virtue 135 Family Disruptions 138 10. Whose Wealth? 143 Wealth Demoralized 144 The Limits to Growth 145 Collective Interests 147 The Corn Laws 149 Free Trade 150 Protectionism 152 Selfish Classes 154 11. The Social Family 158 The Social Father 159 The Great Dream 161 Class and Gender 163 Owen’s Economics 164 The Appeal of One Half the Human Race 165 Feminist Socialism 167 Utopian and Scientific 169 12. Equal Opportunities 174 Napoleonic Code 175 Secular Humanism 176 The Sexual Radicals 177 Le Tribune des Femmes 179 The Calculus of Harmony 180 The Sexual Welfare State 182 xiv tableofcontents Brook Farm 184 Crazy Attempts 186 13. The Subjection of Women 190 The Partnership 191 The Subjection of Women 195 Political Activism 198 A Fundamental Question 201 14. Declaring Independence 205 Peculiar Institutions 206 Equality and Difference 208 Collective Interests 211 The Economic Significance of Family Work 212 Divorce and Reproductive Rights 214 Balancing Acts 217 15. The Icy Waters 222 Revolutions 223 Scientific Self Interest 225 The Holy Family 226 The Response to Bebel 227 Bebel and Social Democracy 229 The Survival of the Altruistic 230 The Free Development of All 232 16. The Sacred Sphere 235 Domestic Advice 236 The Meaning of Motherhood 238 Neoclassical Altruism 239 Women’s Duties 243 Virtue and Consequences 247 17. The Unproductive Housewife 251 Counting Workers 252 The U.S. and Massachusetts Censuses 253 A Double Bind 256 Home Economics and Household Production 258 table of contents xv National Income and the Value of Labor Services 260 The Meaning of the Adjectives 263 18.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEMINIST ECONOMICS Economics 343, Wellesley College Fall 2015, Mondays, 4:10-5:20 and Thursdays, 2:50-5:20 Pm
    FEMINIST ECONOMICS Economics 343, Wellesley College Fall 2015, Mondays, 4:10-5:20 and Thursdays, 2:50-5:20 pm Professor Julie Matthaei Office Hours: Economics Department Mondays 5:30-6 pm PNE 423, x 2181 Thurs., 5:30-6:30pm Soo Jin So, Case Fellow & by appointment Objectivity is male subjectivity, made unquestionable. --Adrienne Rich The womanist anti-oppressionist logic is that all forms of oppression, named or unnamed, are unacceptable and derive from a common problem: the dominating impulse, which is, with effort, alchemically transmutable. --Layli Marpayan Education either functions as an instrument which is used to facilitate integration of the younger generation into the logic of the present system and bring about conformity or it becomes the practice of freedom, the means by which men and women deal critically and creatively with reality and discover how to participate in the transformation of their world. •-Paulo Freire COURSE DESCRIPTION: Feminist economics critically analyzes both economic theory and economic life through the lens of gender, and advocates various forms of feminist economic transformation. In this course, we will explore this exciting and self-consciously political and transformative field. After a conceptual introduction to feminist and anti-hierarchical theory, we will look in some depth at seven different types of feminist economic transformation: questioning/envisioning, equal rights and opportunity, valuing the devalued, integrative, discernment, combining, and globalizing/localizing. Our study will include feminist economic analyses of areas understudied or ignored by traditional economists -- occupational segregation by sex, the economics of the household, and caring labor – as well as feminist economic policy prescriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainstreaming Gender Sensitivity in Cash Crop Market Supply Chains
    Mainstreaming Gender Sensitivity in Cash Crop Market Supply Chains Ruth Vargas Hill and Marcella Vigneri1 Background Report for SOFA 2010 December 2009 This paper considers the impact of gender specific constraints on the production and marketing of cash crops. Cash crop production differs from general agricultural production in that it entails engaging in output markets to make sales. This in turn requires reliable access to these markets, and has implications on the necessary scale and quality of production. Assessing the nature of female involvement in cash crop production is important, not just because it differs from the production of other crops, but because cash crop production holds significant potential as a means by which rural households can improve their welfare. Through a combination of review and original data analysis, this paper stresses the point that women are equally productive as men and receive equal prices to men, when they farm with the same resources and sell their crops in the same way. However, our review and analysis shows that women rarely have similar access to assets and markets as men and this has a non‐trivial impact on production and marketing of cash crops. These gender inequalities in resources result in different levels of participation, methods of production and modes of marketing cash crops, and bear consequences for women’s potential outcome in the cultivation of these high value crops. 1 Ruth Vargas Hill ([email protected]) is Research Fellow with the Markets, Trade and Institutions Division of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI, Washington DC, US).
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Challenges Towards the Implementation of the Post 2015 Agenda SEPTEMBER 9
    , 2015 , th ll AND th 0 l , th statistical challenges towards the implementation of the Post 2015 Agenda SEPTEMBER 9 international meeting on Statistical challenges towards the implementation of the Post 2015 Agenda September 9th, 10th a nd 11th INEGI, Aguascalientes, Mexico Fraccionamiento Jardines del Parque. 2301, Héroe de Nacozari Sur No. Av. Mexico, Aguascalientes, This event will be held in the Multipurpose Room, at the INEGI Headquarters Building, located in Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, at the INEGI Headquarters located in will be held in the MultipurposeThis event Room, Building, AGUASCALIENTES, MEXICO / AGUASCALIENTES, l6th In the year 2000, UN Women, INEGI and INMUJERES agreed upon the Conceptual note for the need to initiate an international dialogue with countries of the Latin International Meeting on Gender America and Caribbean Region, in order to assist in the strengthening of the awareness on the generation, dissemination and use of gender Statistics: Statistical challenges statistics for gender equality policies, in line with the main areas of towards the implementation concern of the Beijing Platform for Action and the declaration of the binding mandate of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of the Post 20l5 Agenda of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Inter-American Convention to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence Against Women, “Convention of Belém do Pará”. That year, the 1st international meeting on gender statistics was organized.1 As a result, a solid strategic alliance was built which the Gender Affairs Division of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) joined in 2006. One of the most noteworthy developments of this alliance was the creation of the Working Group of Gender Statistics (WGGS) of the Statistical Conference of the Americas (SCA) of ECLAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, Remittances and Intra-Household Allocation in Northern Ghana: Does Gender Matter?
    MIGRATION, REMITTANCES AND INTRA-HOUSEHOLD ALLOCATION IN NORTHERN GHANA: DOES GENDER MATTER? A Dissertation Presented by LYNDA JOYCE PICKBOURN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2011 Department of Economics © Copyright by Lynda Joyce Pickbourn 2011 All Rights Reserved MIGRATION, REMITTANCES AND INTRA-HOUSEHOLD ALLOCATION IN NORTHERN GHANA: DOES GENDER MATTER? A Dissertation Presented by LYNDA JOYCE PICKBOURN Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________________ James K. Boyce, Chair _______________________________________ Nancy Folbre, Member _______________________________________ James Heintz, Member ____________________________________ Michael Ash, Department Head Department of Economics DEDICATION To my mother, Gladys Kotey . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a pleasure to thank the many people who have contributed in different ways to the completion of this project. First, I owe my deepest gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee – James Boyce, Nancy Folbre and James Heintz – for their patience, support and encouragement. In the initial stages of my research, Jim Boyce allowed me the space to develop and explore my ideas, and throughout the process he has challenged me to think about migration and economic development in different ways and has consistently encouraged me to take things further than I might otherwise have done. I took a class with Nancy Folbre right after finishing up my field research in Ghana, at a time when it seemed like there was so much to be said that I would never be able to say it all. She inspired me to clarify my thinking about social norms and gave me the confidence to believe in what I had to say, and her feedback has been invaluable in helping to sharpen my writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Assigning Care: Gender Norms and Economic Outcomes
    AssigningInternational care: Labour Gender Review, norms Vol. and 138 economic (1999), No. outcomes 3 311 Assigning care: Gender norms and economic outcomes M.V. Lee BADGETT* and Nancy FOLBRE** n many different cultures, being female is associated with care for others. I Women are generally held to higher standards of family responsibility than men. A daughter who neglects her parents, a wife who leaves a husband, a mother who abandons a child — all are considered more culpable than a son, husband or father who does the same. Gender norms governing interpretation of appropriate behaviour for women and men are closely linked to socially constructed concepts of familial altruism and individual self-interest. Women who seem highly independent or ambitious, like men who seem highly depend- ent or family-oriented, are often considered sexually unattractive. In the socio- logical literature, the interpersonal enactment of culturally specified roles is sometimes termed “doing gender” (Berk, 1985; Brines, 1994). Doing gender typically involves assigning care. No matter who performs it, caring labour is expensive (England and Folbre, 1999). A parent who de- votes time and energy to “family-specific” activities typically experiences a significant reduction in lifetime earnings (Joshi, 1990 and 1998; Waldfogel, 1997). The human capital that housewives and/or househusbands acquire is less transportable than that of a partner who specializes in market work, leaving them in a weaker bargaining position in the family and economically vulner- able to separation or divorce (Braunstein and Folbre, 1999; Weitzman, 1985). Furthermore, employees in caring occupations are typically paid less than others, even controlling for a large list of other personal and job characteris- tics (England, 1992; England et al., 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • The Comparative Political Economy of Womanhood
    Sex, Markets, and Power Political Science 427 Monday/Wednesday 10:30-11:45 Frances Rosenbluth 304 Brewster Hall 432-5256 Course Description: This course considers how women’s socio-economic status and political power has varied across time (in historical perspective) and place (in Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas). We will employ three analytical lenses to help us interpret what we see: biology, markets, and power. These lenses will help us understand how issues specific to women relate to debates in mainstream political economy. How does the sex with which you were born matter, and why? How do different forms of economic production affect the distribution of resources between men and women? What generates and sustains power structures that are relatively patriarchal or matriarchal or mixed? We will examine a range of substantive issues that concern women in a wide range of societies to gauge which kinds of explanations are the most persuasive. Course Requirements: 1. 3 short (3-5 page) papers, handed in at the beginning of any three weeks of the course, that grapple with the question posed in the syllabus. 2. A one-hour in-class midterm exam (30% of grade). 3. An 8-page take home exam. Course Schedule and Readings: Part I: Theoretical Lenses Week 1. Introduction: Sex, Markets, and Power Week 2. Why Sex Matters Q: What is the strongest case for the argument that biology matters for human behavior? What is the strongest case you can make that it does not? • Deborah Blum. 1997. Sex on the Brain: The Biological Differences Between Men and Women.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Überwindung Des Bestehenden 4
    DIE ÜBERWINDUNG DES BESTEHENDEN 4 Aus dem bisher Gesagten lässt sich die ‚objektive‘ * Notwendigkeit der Abschaffung des bestehenden patriarchalen und kapitalistischen Systems deutlich Es ist das Ausmaß ihrer ablesen. Es ist das Ausmaß ihrer Destruktivität, das die Destruktivität *, das die Überwindung der herrschenden Überwindung der herrschenden Gesellschaft ‚objektiv' notwendig Gesellschaft ‚objektiv' notwendig ( ) macht. „Es ist an der Zeit, einen macht. Allein die subjektive * radikalen Bruch in Europa zu Notwendigkeit scheint zu fehlen. wagen!“ 1 Dieser Bruch muss hier stattfinden. Er darf sich nicht in Appellen, Demos und der Solidarisierung mit Kämpfen in aller Welt erschöpfen. Je länger es dauert, bis er stattfindet, desto stärker werden die Zerstörungen des Kapitalismus die Entfaltungsmöglichkeiten einschränken. Oder, in anderen Worten: „In einer Welt, in der sich der soziale und ökologische Krieg jeden Moment weiter zuspitzt, ist es an der Zeit, zu einem Punkt zu kommen, an dem wir die Möglichkeit zur Veränderung der Welt nicht länger als eine Frage formulieren, diese Veränderung auch in die eigenen Hände zu nehmen. Die Notwendigkeit einer radikalen gesellschaftlichen Veränderung ist angesichts der globalen Lage keine theoretische Möglichkeit, sondern ein Fakt.“ 2 Wir können nicht die Revolution machen, aber wir können dazu beitragen, diese vorzubereiten. 3 Dieser revolutionäre Bruch strebt danach, jede Form von Herrschaft zu überwinden. Denn: „Wir haben nicht zweierlei Gewicht und zweierlei Maß für die Tugenden der Beherrschten und die der Herrschenden; wir wissen, dass wir selbst nicht ohne Fehler sind und dass die besten unter uns durch Machtausübung schnell korrumpiert wären. Wir nehmen die Menschen als das was sie sind und darum hassen wir die Herrschaft von Menschen über Menschen und arbeiten Anm.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Living in One of the Most Exciting Times in History, a Time Of
    THE TRANSFORMATIVE MOMENT Julie Matthaei, Wellesley College Barbara Brandt, Independent Scholar From Richard Westra, ed. The Political Economy of the Present and Possible Global Future(s). New York: Anthem Press, forthcoming Slightly Revised; June 2007 2 THE TRANSFORMATIVE MOMENT1 We are living in one of the most exciting times in history. It is a time of crisis and breakdown, and a time of potential transition to a new and more evolved economic and social stage. Diverse and vibrant movements for social transformation are springing up all around the world. The United States, while playing a reactionary role through its imperialist state policies and globalizing corporations, is also a locus of significant post- modern transformation. We call this time in the U.S. “the Transformative Moment,” to emphasize its potential for paradigmatic and systematic economic and social change. The Transformative Moment can be understood as a deep-seated and many- faceted response to the imbalances, inequality, and lack of freedom created by the reigning economic and social paradigm, a paradigm which we call the Hierarchical Polarization Paradigm. In the first part of this paper, we will analyze the core elements of the Hierarchical Polarization Paradigm. In the second part, we will discuss the seven transformative processes that various U.S. social movements are participating in now, processes which are beginning to construct a new, more balanced, free, and equal paradigm of economic and social life. Our goal in this paper to provide the reader with a new conceptual framework which will help them understand the transformative potential of the present historical conjuncture in the United States—the Transformative Moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Inequality and Bargaining in the US
    Gender inequality and bargaining in the U.S. labor market Why care work is undervalued Report • By Nancy Folbre • March 10, 2021 Summary: Nancy Folbre, University of Massachusetts-Amherst There have been large and persistent disparities of labor market outcomes facing women and, though some disparities have declined, they remain consequential to women and their families. [togglable text="expand abstract"] These gender disparities cannot be explained, as some have tried to do, by pointing to personal choices, work-life patterns or skill differences. Basically, analyses based competitive markets characterized by equal bargaining power between workers and employers cannot explain gender disparities in outcomes. This paper reviews recent research on gender inequality in earnings, showing how complex processes of multidimensional bargaining often lie submerged in the background of empirical findings. The paper will also briefly describe five specific organizing efforts—both progressive and regressive---that dramatize the many forms of power that come into play in gender “negotiations.” The concept of bargaining power can provide a powerful framework for examining the persistence of gender inequality in the U.S. labor market. At the same time, attention to gender inequality can broaden the ways we conceptualize bargaining power. [/togglable] • Washington, DC View this report at epi.org/209716 SECTIONS Executive summary 1. Executive summary • 1 2. Introduction • 1 Empirical research on the causes of the surprisingly 3. The limits of persistent earnings gap between women and men often neoclassical takes the form of statistical models that control for as many economics • 2 variables as possible—race, ethnicity, education, labor force experience, job tenure, hours of work, occupation, 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Research on the Care Economy and Economic Development
    Developing care Recent research on the care economy and economic development Nancy Folbre Photo: Tommy Trenchard DEVELOPING CARE: RECENT RESEARCH ON THE CARE ECONOMY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Nancy Folbre © 2018 International Development Research Centre This paper was commissioned by IDRC through the GrOW program to review and put in context recently-supported research on the social organization of care and its implications for women’s economic empowerment in the Global South. Opinions stated in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of IDRC or the GrOW funders. AUTHOR’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the organizations who funded the projects reviewed here for their commitment to innovation in both research and policy. I deeply appreciate the support and feedback of Martha Melesse, other IDRC staff members, and grantees. My student, Leila Gautham, provided invaluable research assistance. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Nancy Folbre is Director of the Program on Gender and Care Work at the Political Economy Research Institute and Professor Emerita of Economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She has published widely—for academic and popular audiences—on issues at the interface between political economy and feminist theory, with a particular emphasis on the value of unpaid care work. ABOUT THE GROW PROGRAM The Growth and Economic Opportunities for Women (GrOW) program is a multi-funder partnership between the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development, The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC). www.idrc.ca/grow ABOUT IDRC Part of Canada’s foreign affairs and development efforts, IDRC invests in knowledge, innovation, and solutions to improve lives and livelihoods in the developing world.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Educational Materials Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies 2017 Introduction to Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Miliann Kang University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected] Donovan Lessard University of Massachusetts Amherst Laura Heston University of Massachusetts Amherst Sonny Nordmaken University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/wost_ed_materials Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Kang, Miliann; Lessard, Donovan; Heston, Laura; and Nordmaken, Sonny, "Introduction to Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies" (2017). Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Educational Materials. 1. https://doi.org/10.7275/R5QZ284K This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Educational Materials by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction to Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Introduction to Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Miliann Kang, Donovan Lessard, Laura Heston, Sonny Nordmarken and Kang, Miliann UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST LIBRARIES AMHERST, MA Introduction to Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies by Miliann Kang, Donovan Lessard, Laura Heston, Sonny Nordmarken is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Care Penalty and Gender Inequality Nancy Folbre University of Massachusetts Amherst Version of March 31, 2017 Abstract
    The Care Penalty and Gender Inequality Nancy Folbre University of Massachusetts Amherst Version of March 31, 2017 Abstract: This article explains why care work often imposes a financial penalty that contributes to gender inequality. The work of caring for others—whether unpaid or paid—often involves more personal connection, emotional attachment and moral commitment than other forms of work. It creates public as well as private benefits, and its value is difficult to measure. All these factors put care providers at an economic disadvantage. Keywords: care, unpaid work, gender inequality, specialization, market failure, externality The average woman devotes more time to family care than the average man and is more likely to be employed in a job that involves care for others. The average woman also earns less than the average man. These patterns reinforce one other: When people are seeking a partner who will be a good family caregiver, they prefer someone who has signaled caring preferences and skills. When people take time out of paid employment for any reason, they typically experience a reduction in future earnings and career prospects. When people earn less than their partners, they are likely to take on more responsibility for family care. This gender specialization contributes to gender inequality. While care work is morally and socially valued, it receives an unpredictable and often low level of economic reward both in the home and in the labor market. Married women often enjoy a share of their husband’s earnings, but the level is determined more by whom they marry than by how much time they devote to family care or how many children they raise.
    [Show full text]