DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Capital: What Is in It for Feminist Economics?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Capital: What Is in It for Feminist Economics? SOCIAL CAPITAL: WHAT IS IN IT FOR FEMINIST ECONOMICS? Irene van Staveren August 2002 Working Paper 368 The author is grateful to an anonymous referee for valuable comments, and to participants at the social capital session of the IAFFE Conference, Los Angeles, 12-14 July 2002, for their comments. 0 The Institute of Social Studies is Europe's longest-established centre of higher education and research in development studies. Post-graduate teaching programmes range from six-week diploma courses to the PhD programme. Research at ISS is fundamental in the sense of laying a scientific basis for the formulation of appropriate development policies. The academic work of ISS is disseminated in the form of books, journal articles, teaching texts, monographs and working papers. The Working Paper series provides a forum for work in progress which seeks to elicit comments and generate discussion. The series includes the research of staff, PhD participants and visiting fellows, and outstanding research papers by graduate students. For further information contact: ORPAS - Institute of Social Studies - P.O. Box 29776 2502LT The Hague - The Netherlands - FAX: +31 70 4260799 E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 0921-0210 Comments are welcome and should be addressed to the author: CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 1 2. SOCIAL CAPITAL IN ECONOMICS............................................................ 3 2.1 Empirical Studies of Social Capital ...........................................................4 2.2 Integration of Social Capital in Economics ...............................................8 2.3 Social Capital in Alternative Views on Economics .................................13 3. SOCIAL CAPITAL: WHAT’S IN IT FOR FEMINIST ECONOMICS? ..... 17 3.1 Gender in Social Capital Research........................................................... 18 3.2 Cross-Fertilisation of two Research Agendas? ........................................22 4. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................. 24 REFERENCES................................................................................................... 25 1 1. INTRODUCTION Economics has been criticised from a wide variety of perspectives, in more or less fundamental ways. Often the critiques develop into some theoretical position, which fits more or less easily, or not at all, with mainstream theories (old and new in- stitutional economics being examples of either of such fits). Feminist economics, to- gether with a few other new areas of research in the discipline such as environmental economics, entails a broader position vis-à-vis the mainstream. As is clear from over a decade of feminist economic publications, it ranges from empirical research, measur- ing, describing, and explaining gender differences in the economy, to conceptual inno- vations drawing on gender studies in other disciplines, to fundamental critiques of mainstream economic methodology, epistemology, and theory (Marianne Ferber and Julie Nelson, 1993; Sandra Harding, 1995). So, there is feminist neoclassical econom- ics as well as feminist marxist, institutional, post-keynesian economics, and political economy, all employing gender analyses to the study of the economy. In this process of engendering economic theories, feminist economics has shown that it benefits from in- teraction with other strands of critique of economics. For example, gender norms can be understood as institutions that guide and constrain economic actors’ behaviour (Nancy Folbre, 1994; Ann Jennings, 1993), or gender relations in the division of la- bour, production, and consumption within the household are critically explored with the help of insights developed in bargaining theory (Marjorie McElroy, 1990; Amartya Sen, 1990; Janet Seiz, 1991; Notburga Ott, 1992; Bina Agarwal, 1997). A relatively new critique of economics can be found in the concept of social capital. It is not a theory, nor a clearly distinguishable field of study, but indeed a con- cept, which has triggered an enormous amount of literature, most of it only since the mid-1990s. Most literature on social capital can be found in political science and soci- ology, but the concept has found its way into economics as well. Basically, the concept addresses the ‘social’ and ‘cultural’ aspects of human behaviour, recognising that these dimensions have economic implications. More precisely, some economists have recog- nised that, contrary to the assumptions of neoclassical economic theory, markets would not be able to function without the social characteristics that are regarded as making up social capital (David Korten, 1996; Irene van Staveren 2001). Given the variety of views among economists on social capital, there are various definitions of social capital around. Most definitions emphasise a functionalist dimension, referring to collective action (in political science definitions), to social cohesion (in sociology), or to wellbe 1 ing or even economic growth (in economics). In van Staveren (2000: 7) I have sug- gested a more neutral definition of the concept, in which I understand social capital as a shared commitment to social values as expressed in the quantity and quality of social relationships. Whatever the exact definition, social capital appears to be a notion that tries to address a serious gap in economics, a gap that is also sharply criticised by femi- nist economists. Feminist economists have shown that most of economics lack attention to relations between economic actors, that power and norms are ignored, and that the construction of economic rationality excludes emotion, morality and cultural values (Marianne Ferber and Julie Nelson, 1993; Edith Kuiper and Jolande Sap, 1995). The origins of the concept of social capital are often traced back to the sociolo- gists Pierre Bourdieu (1986) and James Coleman (1988), although the general idea of the role of the social in the economic is much older, and can be found, for example, in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments. While Bourdieu emphasises the durable network character of social capital and its embeddedness in power relations, Coleman’s definition is more functionalistic, and in that sense compatible with the more com- monly known forms of capital. But the concept became really popular among econo- mists with a widely quoted study by political scientist Robert Putnam (1993), on the differences in social capital between North and South Italy. Putnam has argued that dif- ferences in democracy and economic development between the two regions in Italy could be best explained by different levels of social capital. He distinguished two widely referred to types of social capital, bonding social capital which he located within groups, and bridging social capital, which has a more generalised character an can be found in the connections between people across groups. Hence, group membership, or associational life, is an important variable in Putnam’s approach to social capital. In economics, Coleman’s work on social capital was picked up by Gary Becker (1996) who integrated social capital as a preference in utility functions. The World Bank (1998) has also embraced the notion and emphasises the capital aspect, linking social capital to civil society and regarding it as a resource for the economic development process of poor countries. Francis Fukuyama’s (1995a) best seller Trust claims that this moral value helps to explain economic success of enterprises and nations. In the mean time a wide variety of economists has borrowed the concept for a wide variety of re- search. The literature on social capital and trust in economics has become so extensive, 2 that I cannot even try to do justice to it1. My review below therefore necessarily draws on a small selection of the literature, focusing on the more frequently cited publica- tions, edited volumes, and evaluative publications. Furthermore, a more subjective se- lection was done from the empirical literature, biased by the author’s involvement in development studies and therefore including more developing country studies and less OECD country studies. Moreover, literature in environmental studies referring to social capital will not be taken into account, since that is again a different and complex set of literature (see, for example, the World Bank view on the link between poverty and the environment through social capital in World Bank 1997). Given these limitations, the paper will try to provide a summary of some major ideas and findings in the social capital literature in economics and identify possible op- portunities for (mutual) beneficial exchange with feminist economics. 2. SOCIAL CAPITAL IN ECONOMICS The overview that will follow below will distinguish between three categories of social capital research: empirical, integrationist, and alternative approaches. Each of these categories will also pay attention to some major publications on trust, which is commonly agreed to be an important constituting element of social capital. There is some overlap between the categories that I will distinguish, but in general publications tend to fall more in one than in one of the another categories. The first category, that of empirical research on social capital, is by far the largest: economists have shown an eager interest in transforming the abstract idea of social capital into measurable vari- ables and model specifications, for which often secondary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Three Dimensions of Classical Utilitarian Economic Thought ––Bentham, J.S
    July 2012 Three Dimensions of Classical Utilitarian Economic Thought ––Bentham, J.S. Mill, and Sidgwick–– Daisuke Nakai∗ 1. Utilitarianism in the History of Economic Ideas Utilitarianism is a many-sided conception, in which we can discern various aspects: hedonistic, consequentialistic, aggregation or maximization-oriented, and so forth.1 While we see its impact in several academic fields, such as ethics, economics, and political philosophy, it is often dragged out as a problematic or negative idea. Aside from its essential and imperative nature, one reason might be in the fact that utilitarianism has been only vaguely understood, and has been given different roles, “on the one hand as a theory of personal morality, and on the other as a theory of public choice, or of the criteria applicable to public policy” (Sen and Williams 1982, 1-2). In this context, if we turn our eyes on economics, we can find intimate but subtle connections with utilitarian ideas. In 1938, Samuelson described the formulation of utility analysis in economic theory since Jevons, Menger, and Walras, and the controversies following upon it, as follows: First, there has been a steady tendency toward the removal of moral, utilitarian, welfare connotations from the concept. Secondly, there has been a progressive movement toward the rejection of hedonistic, introspective, psychological elements. These tendencies are evidenced by the names suggested to replace utility and satisfaction––ophélimité, desirability, wantability, etc. (Samuelson 1938) Thus, Samuelson felt the need of “squeezing out of the utility analysis its empirical implications”. In any case, it is somewhat unusual for economists to regard themselves as utilitarians, even if their theories are relying on utility analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Failure Guide
    Market failure guide A guide to categorising market failures for government policy development and evaluation industry.nsw.gov.au Published by NSW Department of Industry PUB17/509 Market failure guide—A guide to categorising market failures for government policy development and evaluation An external academic review of this guide was undertaken by prominent economists in November 2016 This guide is consistent with ‘NSW Treasury (2017) NSW Government Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis, TPP 17-03, Policy and Guidelines Paper’ First published December 2017 More information Program Evaluation Unit [email protected] www.industry.nsw.gov.au © State of New South Wales through Department of Industry, 2017. This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material provided that the wording is reproduced exactly, the source is acknowledged, and the copyright, update address and disclaimer notice are retained. To copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any of this publication you will need to seek permission from the Department of Industry. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing July 2017. However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that the information upon which they rely is up to date and to check the currency of the information with the appropriate officer of the Department of Industry or the user’s independent advisor. Market failure guide Contents Executive summary
    [Show full text]
  • Social Insurance: Connecting Theory to Data
    CHAPTER 3 Social Insurance: Connecting Theory to Data Raj Chetty*,† and Amy Finkelstein†,‡ *Harvard University †NBER ‡MIT Contents 1. Introduction 112 2. Motivations for Social Insurance 114 2.1. Adverse Selection: Review of the Basic Theory 115 2.1.1. A Stylized Model 116 2.1.2. The Textbook Case 118 2.1.3. Departures from the Textbook Environment: Loads and Preference Heterogeneity 123 2.2. Empirical Evidence on Selection 127 2.2.1. Testing for Selection 128 2.2.2. Evidence on Selection 131 2.2.3. Welfare Consequences 134 2.2.4. Directions for Future Work 139 2.3. Other Motivations 140 3. Design of Public Insurance Programs 143 3.1. Optimal Benefit Level in a Static Model 145 3.2. Sufficient Statistics Implementation 148 3.2.1. Consumption Smoothing 148 3.2.2. Liquidity vs. Moral Hazard 157 3.2.3. Reservation Wages 159 3.3. Generalizing the Static Model 163 3.3.1. Dynamics: Endogenous Savings and Borrowing Constraints 163 3.3.2. Externalities on Private Insurers 168 3.3.3. Externalities on Government Budgets 170 3.3.4. Other Externalities 172 3.3.5. Imperfect Optimization 174 3.4. Other Dimensions of Policy 176 3.4.1. Liquidity Provision and Mandated Savings Accounts 176 3.4.2. Imperfect Takeup 178 3.4.3. Path of Benefits 180 4. Challenges for Future Work 182 Acknowledgments 186 References 186 Handbook of Public Economics, Volume 5 © 2013 Elsevier B.V. ISSN 1573-4420, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00003-0 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMINIST ECONOMICS Economics 343, Wellesley College Fall 2015, Mondays, 4:10-5:20 and Thursdays, 2:50-5:20 Pm
    FEMINIST ECONOMICS Economics 343, Wellesley College Fall 2015, Mondays, 4:10-5:20 and Thursdays, 2:50-5:20 pm Professor Julie Matthaei Office Hours: Economics Department Mondays 5:30-6 pm PNE 423, x 2181 Thurs., 5:30-6:30pm Soo Jin So, Case Fellow & by appointment Objectivity is male subjectivity, made unquestionable. --Adrienne Rich The womanist anti-oppressionist logic is that all forms of oppression, named or unnamed, are unacceptable and derive from a common problem: the dominating impulse, which is, with effort, alchemically transmutable. --Layli Marpayan Education either functions as an instrument which is used to facilitate integration of the younger generation into the logic of the present system and bring about conformity or it becomes the practice of freedom, the means by which men and women deal critically and creatively with reality and discover how to participate in the transformation of their world. •-Paulo Freire COURSE DESCRIPTION: Feminist economics critically analyzes both economic theory and economic life through the lens of gender, and advocates various forms of feminist economic transformation. In this course, we will explore this exciting and self-consciously political and transformative field. After a conceptual introduction to feminist and anti-hierarchical theory, we will look in some depth at seven different types of feminist economic transformation: questioning/envisioning, equal rights and opportunity, valuing the devalued, integrative, discernment, combining, and globalizing/localizing. Our study will include feminist economic analyses of areas understudied or ignored by traditional economists -- occupational segregation by sex, the economics of the household, and caring labor – as well as feminist economic policy prescriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainstreaming Gender Sensitivity in Cash Crop Market Supply Chains
    Mainstreaming Gender Sensitivity in Cash Crop Market Supply Chains Ruth Vargas Hill and Marcella Vigneri1 Background Report for SOFA 2010 December 2009 This paper considers the impact of gender specific constraints on the production and marketing of cash crops. Cash crop production differs from general agricultural production in that it entails engaging in output markets to make sales. This in turn requires reliable access to these markets, and has implications on the necessary scale and quality of production. Assessing the nature of female involvement in cash crop production is important, not just because it differs from the production of other crops, but because cash crop production holds significant potential as a means by which rural households can improve their welfare. Through a combination of review and original data analysis, this paper stresses the point that women are equally productive as men and receive equal prices to men, when they farm with the same resources and sell their crops in the same way. However, our review and analysis shows that women rarely have similar access to assets and markets as men and this has a non‐trivial impact on production and marketing of cash crops. These gender inequalities in resources result in different levels of participation, methods of production and modes of marketing cash crops, and bear consequences for women’s potential outcome in the cultivation of these high value crops. 1 Ruth Vargas Hill ([email protected]) is Research Fellow with the Markets, Trade and Institutions Division of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI, Washington DC, US).
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Mould: an Institutionalist Political Economy Alternative to the Neoliberal Theory of the Market and the State Ha-Joon Chang, May 2001
    Breaking the Mould An Institutionalist Political Economy Alternative to the Neoliberal Theory of the Market and the State Ha-Joon Chang Social Policy and Development United Nations Programme Paper Number 6 Research Institute May 2001 for Social Development The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) thanks the governments of Denmark, Finland, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom for their core funding. Copyright © UNRISD. Short extracts from this publication may be reproduced unaltered without authorization on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to UNRISD, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNRISD welcomes such applications. The designations employed in UNRISD publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNRISD con- cerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for opinions expressed rests solely with the author(s), and publication does not constitute endorse- ment by UNRISD. ISSN 1020-8208 Contents Acronyms ii Acknowledgements ii Summary/Résumé/Resumen iii Summary iii Résumé iv Resumen v 1. Introduction 1 2. The Evolution of the Debate: From “Golden Age Economics” to Neoliberalism 1 3. The Limits of Neoliberal Analysis of the Role of the State 3 3.1 Defining the free market (and state intervention) 4 3.2 Defining market failure 6 3.3 The market primacy assumption 8 3.4 Market, state and politics 11 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Challenges Towards the Implementation of the Post 2015 Agenda SEPTEMBER 9
    , 2015 , th ll AND th 0 l , th statistical challenges towards the implementation of the Post 2015 Agenda SEPTEMBER 9 international meeting on Statistical challenges towards the implementation of the Post 2015 Agenda September 9th, 10th a nd 11th INEGI, Aguascalientes, Mexico Fraccionamiento Jardines del Parque. 2301, Héroe de Nacozari Sur No. Av. Mexico, Aguascalientes, This event will be held in the Multipurpose Room, at the INEGI Headquarters Building, located in Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, at the INEGI Headquarters located in will be held in the MultipurposeThis event Room, Building, AGUASCALIENTES, MEXICO / AGUASCALIENTES, l6th In the year 2000, UN Women, INEGI and INMUJERES agreed upon the Conceptual note for the need to initiate an international dialogue with countries of the Latin International Meeting on Gender America and Caribbean Region, in order to assist in the strengthening of the awareness on the generation, dissemination and use of gender Statistics: Statistical challenges statistics for gender equality policies, in line with the main areas of towards the implementation concern of the Beijing Platform for Action and the declaration of the binding mandate of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of the Post 20l5 Agenda of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Inter-American Convention to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence Against Women, “Convention of Belém do Pará”. That year, the 1st international meeting on gender statistics was organized.1 As a result, a solid strategic alliance was built which the Gender Affairs Division of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) joined in 2006. One of the most noteworthy developments of this alliance was the creation of the Working Group of Gender Statistics (WGGS) of the Statistical Conference of the Americas (SCA) of ECLAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Monetarism Retain Relevance?
    Economic Quarterly—Volume 98, Number 2—Second Quarter 2012—Pages 77–110 Does Monetarism Retain Relevance? Robert L. Hetzel he quantity theory and its monetarist variant attribute significant reces- sions to monetary shocks. The literature in this tradition documents T the association of monetary and real disorder.1 By associating the oc- currence of monetary disorder with central bank behavior that undercuts the working of the price system, quantity theorists argue for a direction of causa- tion running from monetary disorder to real disorder.2 These correlations are robust in that they hold under a variety of different monetary arrangements and historical circumstances. Nevertheless, correlations, no matter how robust, do not substitute for a model. As Lucas (2001) said, “Economic theory is mathematics. Everything else is just pictures and talk.” While quantity theorists have emphasized the importance of testable implications, they have yet to place their arguments within the standard workhorse framework of macroeconomics—the dynamic, stochastic, general equilibrium model. This article asks whether the quantity theory tradition, which is long on empirical observation but short on deep theoretical foundations, retains relevance for current debates. Another problem for the quantity theory tradition is the implicit rejection by central banks of its principles. Quantity theorists argue that the central bank is responsible for the control of inflation. It is true that at its January 2012 meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) adopted an in- flation target. However, the FOMC did not accompany its announcement with The author is a senior economist and research adviser at the Federal Reserve Bank of Rich- mond.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Failure in Context: Introduction Alain Marciano and Steven G
    Market Failure in Context: Introduction Alain Marciano and Steven G. Medema Market failure, conceived of as the failure of the market to bring about results that are in the best interests of society as a whole, has a long lin- eage in the history of writings on matters economic. As Steven G. Medema has shown in The Hesitant Hand, much of the history of economics can be read as a discussion of whether, and the extent to which, the self- interested actions of private agents, channeled through the market, will redound to the larger social interest. For much of this history, the answers given were negative, and it was assumed that the corrective hand of the state was needed as a constant and consistent regulating force. Thus we find Plato and Aristotle arguing for a wide range of legal restrictions to guard against macroeconomic (to use the modern term) instability; Aqui- nas making the case for rules that promote a measure of Christian justice in economic affairs; mercantilist writers lobbying for restrictions on vari- ous forms of trade (and support for others), as well as for regulations on Correspondence may be addressed to Alain Marciano, University of Montpellier, Department of Economics, Rue Raymond Dugrand, CS 79606, F-34960 Montpellier, France (e-mail: alain [email protected]); and to Steven G. Medema, Department of Economics, University of Colorado Denver, CB 181, PO Box 173364, Denver, CO 80217-3364 (e-mail: steven.medema @ucdenver.edu). The editors wish to thank Paul Dudenhefer for his diligent shepherding of this project from conference to published volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare State in the Twenty-First Century Joseph E
    The Welfare State in the Twenty-First Century Joseph E. Stiglitz1 Designing the twenty-first-century welfare state is part of a broader debate redefining the role of the market, the state, and “civil society”—non-state forms of collective action. One of the tenets of the Reagan-Thatcher revolution was questioning the welfare state. Some worried that the financial burdens of the welfare state would drag down growth. Some worried about the effect of the welfare state on the sense of individual responsibility, others that the welfare state provides an opportunity for the lazy and profligate to take advantage of hardworking citizens. A sense of social solidarity had united citizens around the world during World War II. Some thirty years after that global conflict, that solidarity was eroding, and economic arguments quickened its disintegration. Even two decades after the doctrines of the Reagan-Thatcher revolution of the 1980s had taken root—and long after its shortcomings had become obvious—others argued that the welfare state had contributed to the euro crisis.2 This paper argues that these arguments criticizing the welfare state are for the most part fallacious and that changes in our economy have even increased the importance of the system. The paper then describes some of the key elements of a twenty-first-century welfare state. I. Basic Precepts of the Welfare State To understand the principles and philosophy of the welfare state, it is useful to contrast it with the “neoliberal” or market-oriented state.3 The central economic doctrine of neoliberalism is that markets are efficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Ends Justify Means? Feminist Economics Perspectives on the Business Case for Gender Equality in the UK Labour Market
    e-cadernos CES 05 | 2009 As fundações institucionais da economia Do Ends Justify Means? Feminist Economics Perspectives on the Business Case for Gender Equality in the UK Labour Market Emily Thomson Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/eces/298 DOI: 10.4000/eces.298 ISSN: 1647-0737 Publisher Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra Electronic reference Emily Thomson, « Do Ends Justify Means? Feminist Economics Perspectives on the Business Case for Gender Equality in the UK Labour Market », e-cadernos CES [Online], 05 | 2009, Online since 01 September 2009, connection on 30 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/eces/298 ; DOI : 10.4000/eces.298 DO ENDS JUSTIFY MEANS? FEMINIST ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVES ON THE BUSINESS CASE FOR GENDER EQUALITY IN THE UK LABOUR MARKET EMILY THOMSON DIVISION OF PUBLIC POLICY GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY Abstract: This paper intends to explore a feminist economics perspective on business case arguments for gender equality in the UK labour market, where there are significant inequalities between men and women. Policy discourse on gender equality has moved from one which emphasises ‘equal opportunities’ and notions of fairness and equal treatment to one which focuses on increasing economic efficiency in the wider economy and viewing female employees as a competitive advantage for individual firms. Developments in the policy discourse of gender equality in the labour market have been heavily influenced by mainstream, neoclassical economics. An example of this is the current UK government aim to encourage private sector employers to take action on gender equality voluntarily on the basis of ‘business case’ arguments. The business case itself has been critiqued by many authors but has yet to be considered from an explicitly feminist economics perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics GR 12 MEMO Paper 2
    PROVINCIAL ASSESSMENT GRADE 12 ECONOMICS P2 JUNE 2019 MARKING GUIDELINES MARKS: 150 TIME: 2 hours MARCH 2019 This marking guideline consists of 13 pages. Demo NW/JUNE/ECOM/ EMIS/6******* 2 SECTION A (COMPULSORY) QUESTION 1 1.1 MULTIPLE QUESTIONS 1.1.1 C - fixed 1.1.2 B - quantity demanded is equal to quantity supplied 1.1.3 C – negatively 1.1.4 D - conglomerates 1.1.5 A - public goods 1.1.6 B - failure 1.1.7 D - feasibility study 1.1.8 A - monopoly (8 x 2) (16) 1.2 MATCH ITEMS 1.2.1 D occurs when total costs are greater than total revenue 1.2.2 C value of inputs owned by entrepreneur and used in the production process 1.2.3 F When resources are not allocated in the right proportions and product mix does not match consumers’ tastes 1.2.4 B products are similar but slightly different 1.2.5 A the time is long enough for variable and fixed factors to change 1.2.6 H are the costs that consumers pay when they buy goods ( price) 1.2.7 E situation in which two suppliers dominate the market for service or a product 1.2.8 G the item that is sacrificed when a choice is made (8 x 1) (8) 1.3 GIVE THE CONCEPT. 1.3.1 Demerit goods. 1.3.2 Externalities 1.3.3 Price Ceiling 1.3.4 Average revenue 1.3.5 .Sunk costs 1.3.6 South African Bureau of Standards (6 x 1) (6) [30] TOTAL SECTION A: 30 SECTION B Answer any TWO of the three questions from this section in your ANSWER BOOK QUESTION 2: MICRO ECONOMICS 40 MARKS – 30 MINUTES 2.1 Answer the following questions: 2.1.1 Name any TWO examples of perfect competition.
    [Show full text]