DOCSLIB.ORG

Greater Napanee GREATERFOR MANY REASONS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greater Napanee GREATERFOR MANY REASONS Greater Napanee GREATER FOR MANY REASONS Community & Corporate Services 12 Market Square. P.O. Box 97 Napanee. ON K7R 3L4 TEL 613-354-335] FAX 613-354-5991 www.greaternoponee.com January 11, 2018 The Honourable Kathleen Wynne The Honourable Ya5ir Naqvi Premier of Ontario Minister of the Attorney General of Ontario Legislative Building McMurtry-Scott Building Queen’s Park 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 1A1 Toronto, ON M7A 259 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] The Honourable Charles Sousa The Honourable Bill Mauro Minister of Finance Minister of Municipal Affair5 7 Queen’s Park Crescent, 7th floor 777 Bay Street, 17th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 1Y7 Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] RE: TOWN OF GREATER NAPANEE REQUEST FOR DIRECTION FROM THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO ON PUBLIC POUCY MATTERS RELATING TO OPP POLICE BILLINGS AND FUTURE POLICING GOVERNANCE. Please find attached the Town of Greater Napanee’s request for direction from the Provincial Government on public policy matters relating to OPP police billings and future policing governance. Council would very much appreciate a response from the provincial government to the three public policy questions outlined in the document. If more information or clarification is required, please contact Raymond Callery, CAO at 613-354-3351, ext. 2002 or [email protected]. Thank you in advance for your attention to this request. Yours truly, Susan M. Beckel Clerk Att: 1 Cc: Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Rural Ontario Municipal Association (ROMA) County of Lennox & Addington Council Loyalist Township Council Township of Stone Mills Council Township of Addington Highlands Council Greater Napanee GREATER FOR MANY REASONS Community & Corporate Services l2MarketSquare, PD. Box97 Naponee, ON K7R3L4 TEL613-354-3351 FAX 613-354-5991 www.greaternaponee.com Town of Greater Napanee Request for Direction from the Provincial Government of Ontario on Public Polkv Matters Relating to OPP Police Billings and Future Policing Governance January 2018 Summary The nature of policing and how we look at communities of interest for policing will change with the amendments proposed to the Police Services Act. The Council of the Town of Greater Napanee is seeking direction from the Province on the following three public policy questions, so that the municipality can act accordingly when developing local budgets and safety planning initiatives. 1. Does the Province believe municipal Councils should have the autonomy and authority to establish local levy areas within a municipal political boundary, to reflect differences in calls for service data? 2. Given the larger areas that detachment resources are shared over and the reduced influence of local municipal Councils to deal with policing issues, does the Province agree that calls for service should be billed equally within the detachment or Police Services Board area as opposed to “municipal political boundaries”? 3. Given that Community Safety Plans will attempt to establish the best way to reduce future needs for calls for service in a municipality and that the majority of agencies represented on municipal planning committees will have very broad organizational areas of influence; does the Province agree community safety plans should be developed for OPP Detachment Areas or Police Services Board Areas instead of “municipal political boundaries”? Background Greater Napanee is a rural/urban municipality in eastern Ontario that was created by the 1998 amalgamation of four townships and one Town. The former Town of Napanee was the only municipality in the County of Lennox and Addington paying for policing at the time, so a section of the Minister’s Order, allowed for Greater Napanee to area rate the Ontario Provincial Police contract costs. The Council of Greater Napanee eventually used this authority to create a two-rate system of taxation that was originally based on this differential, but over time never made substantial adjustments to reflect costing or legislative changes. The Municipal Act grants the authority for municipalities to create variations in taxation based on differences of services received through localized area rates. This is common with items such as sidewalks and streetlights. During a citizen committee review of our provision of services, it was questioned at length whether or not this variation could apply to policing (if all residents receive the service from a single municipal wide OPP contract). A copy of the Watson & Associates Report is included for information. The Council passed the following resolution to further explore this issue: ________ RESOLUTION #3 71/1 6: Kaiser & Cole That this new taxation policy consider ‘Method 4” of the Taxation Policy Review Committee Final Report in so far that we take the area-rating offire services, streetlights and sidewalks as included in the report; And finally, that we not leave the OPP issue alone, such that we seek dialogue with the OPP and/or the Pravince to find a clear andfinal decision as to whether or not the ‘calls for service”far the OPP can be area-rated within a given municipality; and that we seek that decision within this term of Council; And that the phase in period be changed to 5 years, with the first year having already been done. Mayor Schermerhorn requested a recorded vote. Yes: Councillors Schenk, Kaiser, Cole, Harvey, Deputy Mayor lsbester and Mayor Schermerhorn No: Councillor Lucas Yes: 6 No: I As a result of the recorded vote the resolution was declared CARRIED. In 2015, after years of consultation, a new billing model for the OPP was implemented which requires municipalities to pay based on a property count system for basic proactive police costs and then also pay additionally for reactive calls for services. Greater Napanee participated on provincial working groups that established recommendations going forward for the new formula being used. Prior to 2015, police costing was based on a staffing approach, where a municipality paid according to the staffing requirements, needed to respond effectively to detachment workload. Under the previous formula, if a municipality had no recorded activity, they could in theory, pay nothing toward OPP policing costs. Taken to the extreme, if there were no calls for service in the Province, the aPP would incur no costs and have to bill nothing to municipalities. It was identified that this made no practical sense. A very detailed process took place to determine, what exactly the base cost of providing an app service to the Province was. These costs are shared evenly across the province by those that receive aPP services, based on an established number of property counts. Beyond base costs, municipalities pay for reactive services, based on a fixed rate per classification of call. Various locations that use app services have diverse levels of use. The higher a municipality’s call volumes, the larger the reactive portion of your app billing will be in any given year. To avoid large swings, especially in smaller communities, a rolling average of call volumes is used. This reflected the reality of 2015; municipalities could negotiate a contract with the app to receive enhanced levels of service or to retain the right to have a Police Services Board for their municipality. A municipality can influence the implementation of aPP resources through local Police Services Boards. This variable portion of the bill also reflected that municipalities had some ability to control factors within their community that influence crime. Base Amount: Properties 7,641 191.35 = $1,462,105 Greater @ Calls for Service: 1.1746% of all municipalities = $1,770,757 Base Amount: Properties 6,942 @ 191.35 = $ 1,328,352 Calls for Service: 0.6041% of all municipalities = $ 910,680 Proposed changes to the Police Services Act, are creating changes to the ability of local jurisdictions to effectively manage the variable portion of their bill. The proposal to alter the number of Police Services Boards to closely align with Detachment geography will reduce local representation and input in the use of police funds raised through municipal taxation. Community Safety Plans will be required by all municipalities but the prescriptive nature of the representation required on the oversight committees will create an imbalance between local and regional input. These changes in the landscape of policing could result in local municipalities being required to cover the variable portion of the OPP bill within their jurisdiction, but having reduced say on Police Services Boards that help implement detachment operations. Community Safety Plans will ultimately help determine how community based programs will be delivered to help pre-empt OPP service calls; but those plans will be developed based on regional agency concerns rather than local municipal objectives. Having considered these continuing changes to both the provision of service, the cost of services and governance of policing; all Provincial Ministries having a stake in the policing portfolio need to bring recommendations forward to answer complex but fundamental questions facing Ontario, regarding the funding of OPP policing services. Considering that base OPP costs are divided equally across municipal users; the particular issue that this correspondence wishes to address is how defined an area will the Province allow a municipality or group of municipalities receiving OPP services, to assess and tax the variable portion of the bill. It is clear from the OPP that they have the ability to attach calls for service data to individual civic addresses. In fact, this data is used to bill municipalities for the calls for service (variable) portion of the bill. As an example, Greater Napanee is an amalgamated municipality with possibly four distinct communities of interest within it. The communities of interest do not necessarily follow the former municipal boundaries prior to the 1998 amalgamation. Council has in the past allowed for a differential in tax rates for policing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gathering Communities Making Connections
    Gathering Communities Making Connections Tyendinaga/Deseronto / Napanee Kingston Sharbot Lake & Area / Bancroft Guide for Indigenous Families and Children Inside you will find Indigenous Services Indigenous Community Groups & Annual Events Key General Services for Families & Children March, 2014 Updating the Guide This guide is a living document. Listings were suggested by community members and there was no selection or editorial committee. We have tried to ensure the guide is accurate and up-to-date. We do not endorse, promote or favor any particular organization person or event. We plan to update the guide every 6 months. Please e-mail, call or text additions, corrections or deletions to Kate Brant 613 354-8937 (landline) or 613 391-7130 (cell) or [email protected] . Once the Guide is updated we will disseminate by way of the internet, websites, email lists. Gathering Community Making Connections guide was compiled by the Aboriginal Services Working Group: Don Amos Northern Frontenac Community Services Margo Beach Pathways for Children and Youth Sharon Beaudin Aboriginal Prenatal Nutrition Program Kate Brant NACHC, Indigenous Health Program Sarah Brown Aboriginal Health Babies, Healthy Children Maureen Buchanan NACHC, Indigenous Health Program Pam Kent PEL&A Social Services Carol Loft Tipi Moza Judith Moses Planner, KFL&A Children & Youth Services Planning Committee Susan Potvin KFL&A Public Health Susan Ramsay Kingston Literacy & Skills – Aboriginal Literacy Circle Midge Rouse Hotel Dieu Hospital Angelique Tamblyn County of Frontenac Nicola Thomas St. Lawrence College Thomas Thompson Métis Nation of Ontario Peter Tytler Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte Shelley Sayle Udall Pathways for Children & Youth Steve Woodman Family & Children Services of Frontenac, Lennox &Addington 2 Introduction What is the Purpose of this Guide? This is a one-of-a-kind Guide to help you connect to Indigenous Communities in Kingston, Tyendinaga, Napanee & Deseronto, Sharbot Lake and Bancroft.
    [Show full text]
  • Napanee Limestone Plain Important Bird Area Conservation Plan
    Napanee Limestone Plain Important Bird Area Conservation Plan Written for the Steering Committee and Stakeholders August 2004 Conservation Plan for the Napanee Limestone Plain IBA August, 2004 Acknowledgements The Important Bird Area (IBA) Program is part of the Natural Legacy 2000 program, a nation-wide initiative to conserve wildlife and habitats on private and public lands. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada's Millennium Partnership Program. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation to Great Lakes Basin Important Bird Areas. Nature Canada (formerly known as the Canadian Nature Federation) and Bird Studies Canada are the Canadian co-partners of BirdLife International, who jointly deliver the Important Bird Areas Program in Canada. Ontario Nature is responsible for site conservation planning in Ontario IBAs. Funding for writing this conservation plan came from Nature Canada through the Government of Canada’s Habitat Stewardship Program. The following people have contributed to this conservation plan in their comments, review, and through meetings with the IBA steering committee: Mike Evans Chris Grooms Kurt Hennige The following organizations have contributed to and/or supported the development of this conservation plan: Bird Studies Canada Canadian Cattlemen’s Association Canadian Wildlife Service Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Ducks Unlimited Canada Eastern Loggerhead Shrike Recovery Action Group Hastings Stewardship Council Kingston Field Naturalists Lennox and Addington Community Stewardship Council Loyalist Township Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte Nature Canada Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Ontario Nature-Federation of Ontario Naturalists The Town of Greater Napanee Township of Stone Mills Township of Tyendinaga Suggested citation D.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 21 Land Use
    292,000 312,000 332,000 352,000 372,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 0 0 8 Townships of Tudor & Cashel 8 9 9 , , 4 4 Township of North Frontenac 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 0 0 6 6 9 9 , , 4 Townships of Tudor & Cashel Township of Addington Highlands 4 TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC 38 0 0 0 Municipality of Tweed 0 0 0 , , 0 0 4 Township of Madoc 4 9 9 , , 4 4 7 41 Madoc Township of South Frontenac Tweed Township of Stone Mills 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Municipality of Centre Hastings , 0 0 2 2 9 9 , , 4 4 Township of Stirling-Rawdon 37 14 Township of Tyendinaga Town of Greater Napanee Loyalist Township 0 Napanee 0 0 City of Belleville 0 0 0 , , 0 0 0 0 9 401 9 , , 4 4 Town of Deseronto City of Quinte West Deseronto Belleville 2 Legend 62 0 0 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 , , 0 0 8 8 8 8 , City Business District , 4 4 Commercial County of Prince Edward Flood Picton Bloomfield Community Facility 33 Residential Wellington Industrial Industrial railway allowance Ministry aggriculture 0 Mineral Aggregate 0 0 0 0 0 , , 0 Recreation Commercial 0 6 6 8 8 , 1:375,000 , 4 Lake Ontario 4 Rural 0 2.5 5 10 Kilometers Open Space 292,000 312,000 332,000 352,000 372,000 Legend Highway 401 Rivers County Boundaries Populated Areas d x m . 6 0 V _ e s U d n a L _ 1 Highways Lakes Township Boundaries Quinte Region 2 _ # p a M C Moira River, Napanee Region and Prince Edward Region Watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Adjustment
    TOWN OF GREATER NAPANEE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT A G E N D A NOVEMBER 27, 2018 at 6:45 p.m. Council Chambers, Town Hall - 124 John St., Napanee Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA 2.1 Adopt Agenda Recommendation: That the Agenda of the Committee of Adjustment dated November 27, 2018 be adopted as presented. 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST & THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 5 - 8 4.1 Committee of Adjustment - November 13, 2018 Recommendation: That the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment dated November 13, 2018 be received and adopted. 5. LAND SEVERANCE APPLICATIONS 9 - 27 5.1 Land Severance Application PLCON 2017 020 D. & M. Bradfield, 2935 County Road 9 Legal Description - CON 5 PT LOT 14 Recommendation: That the committee change the conditions of the previously granted consent for PLCON 2017 020 to add the following condition: “a development agreement be entered into with the municipality whereby the owner agrees to execute conditions b) through i) prior to December 1, 2019” And further; that the committee deem the above noted change to be minor thereby requiring no further Notice of changing conditions. 28 - 42 5.2 Land Severance Application PLCOR 2018 056 M. Carroll, 470 County Road 9 Legal Description - CON 4 PT LOT 11 RP 29R7963 PART 1 Recommendation: That Land Severance Application PLCOR 2018 056 to permit a lot addition of 1,653 m² be approved subject to the following conditions: 1) That taxes be paid in full; 2) That the parcel is to be added to the property identified as Roll No.
    [Show full text]
  • REGULAR SESSION COUNCIL - April 12, 2016 Agenda
    TOWN OF GREATER NAPANEE REGULAR SESSION OF COUNCIL A G E N D A APRIL 12, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Town Hall - 124 John St., Napanee Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA 2.1 Adopt Agenda Recommendation: That the Agenda of the Regular Session of Council dated April 12, 2016 be adopted as presented. 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST & THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 4. PRESENTATIONS 5. DEPUTATIONS 5 5.1 Tom Derreck, Executive Director - Napanee District Community Foundation of Lennox & Addington Re: Introduction and Information on Grants to Celebrate Canada's 150th Birthday in 2017 6 - 20 5.2 Gary Scandlan, Chair - Taxation Policy Review Committee Re: Presentation of Interim Report 5.3 Council Resolution to Accept Additional Deputations with No Notice, if required. 6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 21 - 25 6.1 Regular Session of Council - March 22, 2016 Recommendation: That the minutes of the Regular Session of Council dated March 22, 2016 be adopted as presented. 7. CORRESPONDENCE 7.1. Correspondence for Information 26 - 27 7.1.1 Correspondence for Information items dated - April 12, 2016 Recommendation: That the Correspondence for Information items dated April 12, 2016 be received. 7.2. Correspondence for Action 28 7.2.1 Peter Cruji Re: Status of Richmond Park Drive Extension Page 1 of 142 REGULAR SESSION COUNCIL - April 12, 2016 Agenda Page Recommendation: That Council receive the correspondence from Peter Cruji dated March 18, 2016 regarding the status of the Richmond Park Drive extension; And further that Council direct staff to bring back a report to the next meeting addressing the request.
    [Show full text]
  • CRCA Flood Contingency Plan 2019
    Flood Contingency Plan 2019 July 29, 2019 Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Flood Contingency Plan 2019 CRCA Tel. (613) 546-4228 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF FLOOD CONTINGENCY PLAN ............................................................................. iii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS ...................................................................................................... 5 AREAS OF JURISDICTION ............................................................................................................... 6 2.1 CRCA JURISDICTION .................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 EASTERN LAKE ONTARIO AND THE UPPER ST. LAWRENCE RIVER.................................................. 6 2.3 MNRF JURISDICTION .................................................................................................................. 7 RESPONSIBILITIES OF AGENCIES ................................................................................................ 7 3.1 CRCA RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................................................................... 7 3.2 MUNICIPAL RESPONSIBILITIES ..................................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Municipal Emergency Plan.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Municipal Role in Ontario's Great Lakes Bulk Water Transfer Regulations
    THE MUNICIPAL ROLE IN ONTARIO'S GREAT LAKES BULK WATER TRANSFER REGULATIONS Implementation of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement by Lisa Lin, BES, University of Waterloo, 2008 A thesis presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in the Program of Environmental Applied Science and Management Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2015 ©Lisa Lin 2015 Author’s Declaration for Electronic Submission of a Thesis I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this thesis to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this thesis by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. (ii) Abstract The Municipal Role in Ontario's Bulk Water Transfer Regulations Master of Applied Science 2015 Lisa Lin Environmental Applied Science and Management Ryerson University Despite being creatures of the province under the Canadian Constitution, municipalities are emerging as a partner by taking action on problems seemingly outside their jurisdiction. Because Ontario municipalities have delegated authority from the Province to directly use and manage the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin, they have reason to be engaged in related policy development and act as partners in this intergovernmental framework.
    [Show full text]
  • REGULAR SESSION COUNCIL - August 16, 2016 Agenda
    TOWN OF GREATER NAPANEE REGULAR SESSION OF COUNCIL A G E N D A AUGUST 16, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Town Hall - 124 John St., Napanee Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA 2.1 Adopt Agenda Recommendation: That the Agenda of the Regular Session of Council dated August 16, 2016 be adopted as presented. 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST & THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 4. PUBLIC MEETING UNDER THE PLANNING ACT 4.1 Resolution to Convene Public Meeting under The Planning Act Recommendation: That the Public Meeting under the Planning Act is hereby convened. 7 - 33 4.2 Application: PLZACO 2016 008 - Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law No. 02-22 Applicant: Theo Nibourg on behalf of 1923731 Ontario Ltd. Location of Property: 824 Palace Road, south side of Palace Road immediately south of Highway 401. and described as Lots 24, 25 and 26, Concession 7, geographic Township of North Fredericksburgh, now in the Town of Greater Napanee Effect of the Zoning By-law Request: To allow that portion of the property in the C2-7 (Arterial Commercial Exception Seven) zone to be used for a fitness centre, assembly hall, medical or dental clinic and business, professional or administrative offices. 34 - 52 4.3 Application: PLOPMA 2016 009 and PLZACO 2016 010 - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to By-law No. 02-22 Applicant: Robert Paul and Bob Vrooman on behalf of the Lennox and Addington County General Hospital Foundation Location of Property: 310 Bridge Street West, being Part of Lots 17 and 18, Concession 1, geographic Lands throughout the Town of Greater Napanee Effect of the Zoning By-law Request:The Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment would permit additional uses on the site including business, professional and administrative offices, eating Page 1 of 176 REGULAR SESSION COUNCIL - August 16, 2016 Agenda Page establishments and other commercial uses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Demographic Report for Ontario's Manufacturing
    The Complete Demographic Report for Ontario’s Manufacturing Hub Community Profile for The Bay of Quinte PREPARED BY: QUINTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Representing: Quinte Economic Development Commission 284 B Wallbridge-Loyalist Rd PO Box 610 Belleville, ON K8N 5B3 Canada 1-866-961-7990 Tel: (613) 961-7990 Fax: (613) 961-7998 Email: [email protected] www.quintedevelopment.com The City of Belleville The Municipality The City of Quinte West of Brighton (Trenton) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION to The Bay of Quinte ............................................................................................ 2 Community Profile: Snapshot ........................................................................................................ 4 The Top 5 Competitive Advantages of The Bay of Quinte region ....................................................................................... 4 Population: the region’s two cities and greater rural areas ................................................................................................ 4 Human Resources ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Transportation & Logistics................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Industries .....................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For Review and Potential Conversion
    City of Belleville 2018 Municipal Comprehensive Review of Urban Serviced Area April 11, 2019 Draft Report In association with: Plaza Three, 101-2000 Argentia Rd. Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 1V9 Phone: (905) 272-3600 Fax: (905 272-3602 e-mail: [email protected] Contents Page Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... (i) 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Terms of Reference ................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 What is a Municipal Comprehensive Review? ........................................ 1-2 1.3 Study Process ......................................................................................... 1-2 2. Overview of Macro-Economic Outlook and Regional Employment Trends ....... 2-1 2.1 Trends in Provincial Economy ................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Labour Force Trends .............................................................................. 2-3 2.2.1 Regional Labour Force Trends, Hastings County, 2001 to 2016 ............................................................................................. 2-3 2.2.2 City of Belleville, Labour Force by Place of Work, 2001 to 2016 ............................................................................................. 2-4 2.3 Education Attainment .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terms of Reference Environmental Assessment New Landfill Footprint
    Terms of Reference for Environmental Assessment of a New Landfill Footprint at Beechwood Road Environmental Centre Town of Greater Napanee Volume 3 of 3 Supporting Documents June 2010 Terms of Reference for Environmental Assessment of a New Landfill Footprint at Beechwood Road Environmental Centre Town of Greater Napanee Supporting Document #1 Response to Minister’s Refusal of Previous (2006) EA June 2010 Terms of Reference for a New Landfill Footprint Supporting Document #1 – Response to Minister’s Refusal of Previous (2006) EA Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ SD1-1 2.0 RESPONSE TO MINISTER’S REFUSAL OF PREVIOUS (2006) EA APPLICATION ........................................................................................... SD1-2 2.1 Page 2, Paragraph 5 .................................................................... SD1-2 2.2 Page 3, Paragraph 3 .................................................................... SD1-3 2.3 Page 3, Paragraph 4 .................................................................... SD1-4 2.4 Page 3, Paragraph 5 .................................................................... SD1-5 2.5 Page 4, Paragraph 2 .................................................................... SD1-5 2.6 Page 4, Paragraph 2 .................................................................... SD1-6 2.7 Page 4, Paragraph 5 .................................................................... SD1-6 2.8 Page 4, Paragraph 6 ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • By-Law 02-22
    BY-LAW 02-22 THE ZONING BY-LAW OF THE TOWN OF GREATER NAPANEE NOTE: This in an office consolidation prepared solely for convenience. The original Zoning By-law, and Zoning By-law Amendments and any subsequent Ontario Municipal Board Orders should be consulted for accurate reference. Prepared by: IBI GROUP (Project No. 8692-P / 10758) 650 Dalton Avenue Kingston, Ontario K7M 8N7 BY-LAW 02-22 THE ZONING BY-LAW OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GREATER NAPANEE Passed: April 8, 2002 AS AMENDED BY BY-LAWS: 02-39 03-49 04-35 05-25 06-20 02-45 03-54 04-36 05-29 06-21 02-46 03-58 04-43 05-34 06-24 02-53 03-61 04-47 05-51 06-27 02-64 03-74 04-53 05-52 06-28 02-65 03-75 04-54 05-53 06-36 02-71 04-04 04-65 05-54 06-45 02-72 04-05 04-66 05-56 06-48 02-75 04-10 04-81 05-57 06-53 03-02 04-11 04-82 05-58 06-54 03-03 04-21 04-83 05-63 07-02 03-12 04-22 05-03 05-71 07-03 03-16 04-23 05-05 05-76 03-22 04-29 05-13 05-78 03-23 04-33 05-14 06-12 03-43 04-34 05-24 06-18 EXPLANATORY NOTE TO ZONING BY-LAW No. 02-22 The Council of a municipality may, under Section 34 of The Planning Act, R.S.O.
    [Show full text]