DOCSLIB.ORG

AT a GLANCE at AGLANCE 2020–2021 Systra.Com Our Group Our Values

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AT a GLANCE at AGLANCE 2020–2021 Systra.Com Our Group Our Values AT A GLANCE 2020–2021 systra.com Our Group Our values Our mission is to provide communities with safe and sustainable transportation solutions. EXCELLENCE CONNECTED TEAMS BOLD LEADERSHIP Rooted in our engineering We connect our experts The projects we accompany “Our ambition is to be the signature team culture, excellence is at once throughout the entire Group profoundly transform mobility. for transportation solutions. It’s ensuring that people an objective and a way of and coordinate them in order Via our capacity for innovation doing things. Our customers to respond to the most complex and our project management think of SYSTRA because of its unique way are ambitious and demanding. issues. By going beyond cultural know-how, we bring fresh Our commitment to design the and technical particularities, answers to our clients and the of initiating mobility projects, its ability to seek best solutions under the best we create teams around bold leadership necessary for out the best experts and to mobilise them conditions is a promise of trust, the same objective, in which change. Our task is to consider, performance, and sustainability. the talent of each individual design, and imagine today the to push ever further.” contributes to the success of all. mobility solutions of tomorrow. Pierre Verzat, Chief Executive Officer Our solutions We are present for all transportation solutions and we support our customers throughout the project lifecycle. BUS AND BUS LIGHT RAIL CONSULTANCY RAPID TRANSIT TRANSIT RAIL METROS PROJECT MANAGEMENT HIGH SPEED URBAN CABLE DESIGN CARS BRIDGES STATIONS CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION UNDERGROUND ROADS & TESTING & COMMISSIONING STRUCTURES HIGHWAYS DIGITAL AND NEW OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING 3 DESIGNING AND PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS Our definition TO TACKLE CLIMATE CHANGE Decarbonised mobility is a key driver in the fight against climate change and environmental challenges. It has become a core component of of innovation urban development and helps support regional growth. It is also one of the leading demands made by civil society and a central pillar of public investment and recovery policies. Innovation and technology are valuable tools for boosting the carbon performance of existing infrastructure Innovation at SYSTRA allows us to better serve and integrating environmental issues into project our clients and all mobility solution users. scaling and planning. Solutions like our Carbontracker tool can be used We constantly strive to transform our service offers 2 to calculate the carbon footprint of a project at to best meet their needs and expectations. the design stage and help decision makers make responsible choices. IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE AND SAFETY OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS The demographic growth of cities is placing a 1 strain on transportation infrastructure, which must do more and more within highly constrained environments. Many of our clients are faced with STRENGTHENING SOCIAL ever-increasing passenger flows and complex AND TERRITORIAL COHESION traffic patterns caused by a diversity of uses. Emerging new mobility services must serve They also need to ensure the profi tability of their everyone’s needs. Public transport is a driver infrastructure and quality of service. By innovating of reduced social and territorial inequalities. in these areas, we can strike the right balance Innovation can help achieve these goals by between supply and demand, and between changing the architecture of our transit systems. performance, availability, and security. The issues More coherent and connected, it needs to facilitate of cybersecurity, optimising the use of data for travel and the transition from one mode to maintenance, asset data management, and the 4 another. The idea of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) transformation of existing systems into data-driven brings together technology, planning, and data, technical architectures are especially important TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE DIGITAL and significantly boosts our consultancy role. for our clients. The challenge is to determine the added value of TRANSFORMATION transit solutions and how they can be integrated Digitalisation is rapidly and profoundly through technology. From automation to digital transforming every aspect of mobility. platforms, pricing policies, and shared autonomous The emergence of new technologies creates vehicles, it’s a social and economic equation with as many uses as challenges for our customers. multiple factors. Building on our existing business expertise, we help them implement new technologies to benefit their company. We put BIM at the heart of our engineering projects to strengthen collaboration and design quality but also to serve the needs of future operators or maintenance staff by structuring asset information at the design stage, ensuring digital continuity throughout the lifecycle. Our approach to sustainability Our approach to sustainability is rooted in the expectations of our stakeholders and the continuous improvement of our performance. Through our engineering activities, we are committed to significantly reducing our environmental footprint and actively contributing to the United Nations SDGs. 1 3 TERRITORIES CLIENTS SYSTRA’s contribution AND COMMUNITIES Ensure the satisfaction to the UN Sustainable Serve by inspiring confi dence of our clients and establish Development Goals and providing low-carbon a close and long-term solutions to combat climate relationship of trust with them. SYSTRA’s engineering change and improve activities play an especially the lives of communities. 4 strong role in achieving the following fi ve UN Sustainable 2 PEOPLE Development Goals: Promote engagement ENVIRONMENT and well-being by providing Promote low-carbon pathways a work environment that fosters for our clients by offering dialogue and collaboration, low-emission solutions allowing employees to grow adapted to the challenge and develop their potential. of climate change. 5 SHAREHOLDERS Improve our financial performance to drive long-term profi table growth. Key figures BREAKDOWN OF TURNOVER BY MODE OF TRANSPORT 20% metros 18% high speed 28% rail 16% light rail transit 18% other BREAKDOWN OF TURNOVER BY LOCATION 30% France 13% Americas 18% United Kingdom 16% Asia and Oceania 7% Rest of 16% Middle East Europe and Africa OUR CLIENTS 80% 20% public actors private actors and network operators SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE 43.4% RATP 11.4% Banks 43.4% SNCF 4.4% Crédit Agricole 3.3% BNP Paribas 1.4% Own shares 2% Société Générale 0.4% Employees 1.7% Nati xis OUR INTERNATIONAL NETWORK: TEAMS AROUND THE WORLD UNITED KINGDOM, IRELAND NORDIC 828 COUNTRIES 194 FRANCE 2,055 POLAND CANADA 136 151 SAUDI ARABIA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, QATAR 401 UNITED STATES EGYPT ASIA 184 166 532 BRAZIL INDIA 408 2,171 Map legend: Main locations and main SYSTRA centres of excellence Named countries: Top 12 SYSTRA workforce AUSTRALIA, 103 NEW ZEALAND 7,542 €668m €726m 60+ years 50% 1 in 2 employees Turnover 2020 in orders of expertise of high-speed metros 40% in transportation lines in service designed growth in worldwide worldwide the workforce between 2015 and 2020 Ranking 2020 Engineering News-Record (ENR) #4 Mass transit & rail* #8 Bridges* #10 Transportation** #29 International Design Firms** The maps shown in this public document aim only to illustrate the organisation of operational activities specifi c to SYSTRA. They do not refl ect any intention to express an opinion concerning geopolitical issues. SYSTRA, its subsidiaries and affi liates can in no case be held responsible for * Based on 2019 turnover, published in December 2020 ** Based on 2020 turnover, published in August 2021 any interpretations that may arise. Railway Lines Key figures UNITED ARAB EMIRATES FRANCE THAILAND ETIHAD RAIL 4 NEW PROVENCE-CÔTE HIGH-SPEED RAIL LINKING Key contracts 5 The Design & Build teams D’AZUR LINE 3 AIRPORTS PROJECT have won a second round At the end of 2020, SYSTRA Private concession-holder of implementation studies was awarded a single- EHSR has entrusted SYSTRA won in 2020 for the largest rail project contractor framework with the concept design and currently underway in the agreement, in a consortium project management assistance Middle East. The line will with Egis, for this major rail for the construction of a transport some 2 million project between Marseille and 220-kilometre line linking containers and 30 million tons Nice. The companies will start three international airports of construction materials every by carrying out the on the Gulf of Thailand coast. year to Abu Dhabi and Dubai. environmental engineering design and implementation studies over a period of 13 months, for inclusion in a public inquiry fi le. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Underground Urban structures Consultancy UNITED STATES DENMARK INDIA ITALY FRANCE/ITALY BRAZIL SAN FRANCISCO BART 1 COPENHAGEN S-TOG 2 MUMBAI NETWORKS 3 GENOA MONORAIL LYON-TURIN EURALPIN STUDIES FOR THE NATIONAL SYSTRA is working on CBTC A joint venture team consisting In Mumbai, SYSTRA was SYSTRA-SOTECNI will be the TUNNEL 6 BANK FOR ECONOMIC AND (Communications-Based Train of COWI, Parsons and SYSTRA awarded the contract to lead company of a joint venture SYSTRA was awarded a second SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Control) automation for the Bay was awarded an eight-year deploy a CBTC system for responsible for the technical project management contract SYSTRA was awarded the Area Rapid Transit (BART), framework contract chosen three corridors of the suburban and economic feasibility study for the Lyon-Turin tunnel, largest consulting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Family's Guide to Explore NYC for FREE with Your Cool Culture Pass
    coolculture.org FAMILY2019-2020 GUIDE Your family’s guide to explore NYC for FREE with your Cool Culture Pass. Cool Culture | 2019-2020 Family Guide | coolculture.org WELCOME TO COOL CULTURE! Whether you are a returning family or brand new to Cool Culture, we welcome you to a new year of family fun, cultural exploration and creativity. As the Executive Director of Cool Culture, I am excited to have your family become a part of ours. Founded in 1999, Cool Culture is a non-profit organization with a mission to amplify the voices of families and strengthen the power of historically marginalized communities through engagement with art and culture, both within cultural institutions and beyond. To that end, we have partnered with your child’s school to give your family FREE admission to almost 90 New York City museums, historic societies, gardens and zoos. As your child’s first teacher and advocate, we hope you find this guide useful in adding to the joy, community, and culture that are part of your family traditions! Candice Anderson Executive Director Cool Culture 2020 Cool Culture | 2019-2020 Family Guide | coolculture.org HOW TO USE YOUR COOL CULTURE FAMILY PASS You + 4 = FREE Extras Are Extra Up to 5 people, including you, will be The Family Pass covers general admission. granted free admission with a Cool Culture You may need to pay extra fees for special Family Pass to approximately 90 museums, exhibits and activities. Please call the $ $ zoos and historic sites. museum if you’re unsure. $ More than 5 people total? Be prepared to It’s For Families pay additional admission fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting
    Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting April 2021 Committee Members P. Foye, Chair N. Zuckerman, Vice Chair A. Albert J. Barbas N. Brown M. Fleischer R. Glucksman R. Herman D. Jones K. Law R. Linn D. Mack J. Samuelsen V. Tessitore Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, 4/21/2021 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MARCH 17, 2021 CPOC Committee Minutes - Page 3 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2021 - 2022 CPOC Committee Work Plan - Page 4 4. PRESIDENT’S REPORT President's Report - Page 6 5. CAPITAL PROGRAM UPDATE Progress Report on Signals and Train Control - Page 10 IEC Project Review on Signals and Train Control - Page 14 6. CAPITAL PROGRAM STATUS Commitments, Completions, and Funding Report - Page 31 MINUTES OF MEETING MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE March 17, 2021 New York, New York 10:00 A.M. Because of the ongoing COVID‐19 public health crisis, the MTA Chairman convened a one‐day, virtual Board and Committee meeting session on March 17, 2021, which included the following committees: Long Island Rail Road and Metro‐North Railroad; New York City Transit; MTA Bridges and Tunnels; ; Finance Capital Program Oversight Committee; Corporate Governance. To see a summary of the CPOC Committee meeting, please refer to the March 17, 2021 Board minutes in the April Board Book available here on the Board materials website: https://new.mta.info/transparency/board‐and‐committee‐meetings/april‐2021 ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 3 of 46 - Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 4/21/2021 2021- 2022 CPOC Committee Work Plan I.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail and Sustainability High Speed Rail & Sustainability
    High Speed Rail and Sustainability High Speed Rail & Sustainability Report Paris, November 2011 2 High Speed Rail and Sustainability Author Aurélie Jehanno Co-authors Derek Palmer Ceri James This report has been produced by Systra with TRL and with the support of the Deutsche Bahn Environment Centre, for UIC, High Speed and Sustainable Development Departments. Project team: Aurélie Jehanno Derek Palmer Cen James Michel Leboeuf Iñaki Barrón Jean-Pierre Pradayrol Henning Schwarz Margrethe Sagevik Naoto Yanase Begoña Cabo 3 Table of contnts FOREWORD 1 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 6 2 INTRODUCTION 7 3 HIGH SPEED RAIL – AT A GLANCE 9 4 HIGH SPEED RAIL IS A SUSTAINABLE MODE OF TRANSPORT 13 4.1 HSR has a lower impact on climate and environment than all other compatible transport modes 13 4.1.1 Energy consumption and GHG emissions 13 4.1.2 Air pollution 21 4.1.3 Noise and Vibration 22 4.1.4 Resource efficiency (material use) 27 4.1.5 Biodiversity 28 4.1.6 Visual insertion 29 4.1.7 Land use 30 4.2 HSR is the safest transport mode 31 4.3 HSR relieves roads and reduces congestion 32 5 HIGH SPEED RAIL IS AN ATTRACTIVE TRANSPORT MODE 38 5.1 HSR increases quality and productive time 38 5.2 HSR provides reliable and comfort mobility 39 5.3 HSR improves access to mobility 43 6 HIGH SPEED RAIL CONTRIBUTES TO SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 47 6.1 HSR provides macro economic advantages despite its high investment costs 47 6.2 Rail and HSR has lower external costs than competitive modes 49 6.3 HSR contributes to local development 52 6.4 HSR provides green jobs 57
    [Show full text]
  • Dubai: CREATING the WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 Special
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE HEADLINES l Paris tram network reaches 65km l AnsaldoBreda enters Chinese LRT market l Edinburgh tramway to open early? DUBAI: CREATING THE WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 special Olsztyn Halberstadt Poland’s first How do you new-build sustain a system tramway in with a declining over 50 years population? DECEMBER 2012 No. 900 WWW . LRTA . ORG l WWW . TRAMNEWS . NET £3.80 PESA Bydgoszcz SA 85-082 Bydgoszcz, ul. Zygmunta Augusta 11 tel. (+48)52 33 91 104 fax (+48)52 3391 114 www.pesa.pl e-mail: [email protected] Layout_Adpage.indd 1 26/10/2012 16:15 Contents The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 448 News 448 DECEMBER 2012 Vol. 75 No. 900 Three new lines take Paris tram network to 65km; www.tramnews.net Mendoza inaugurates light rail services; AnsaldoBreda EDITORIAL signs Chinese technology partnership; München orders Editor: Simon Johnston Siemens new Avenio low-floor tram. Tel: +44 (0)1832 281131 E-mail: [email protected] Eaglethorpe Barns, Warmington, Peterborough PE8 6TJ, UK. 454 Olsztyn: Re-adopting the tram Associate Editor: Tony Streeter Marek Ciesielski reports on the project to build Poland’s E-mail: [email protected] first all-new tramway in over 50 years. Worldwide Editor: Michael Taplin Flat 1, 10 Hope Road, Shanklin, Isle of Wight PO37 6EA, UK. 457 15 Minutes with... Gérard Glas 454 E-mail: [email protected] Tata Steel’s CEO tells TAUT how its latest products offer News Editor: John Symons a step-change reduction in long-term maintenance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the G Line
    Review of the G Line ,. July 10, 2013 NYC Transit G Line Review Executive Summary Executive Summary The attached report provides a comprehensive review of operations on the G line. Based on NYC Transit’s standard measures of On-Time Performance and Wait Assessment, the G performs well relative to the average subway line. At the same time, the G differs from other NYC Transit subway lines because the route is relatively short and never enters Manhattan, and thus serves primarily as a feeder/distributor with most riders transferring at least once before reaching their destinations. This review identifies a number of opportunities to improve operations on the G line, with recommendations chiefly intended to provide more even train headways and passenger loading, as well as to improve customer communication. Key Findings: While G ridership has grown significantly in recent years, it still remains relatively low compared to the rest of the system, and average passenger loads on the G are within service guidelines during both peak and off-peak hours. Scheduling the G train around the busier and more frequent F train causes uneven headways and passenger loads on the G, most significantly during the afternoon peak period, when G service is scheduled at the minimum guideline frequency of 6 trains per hour (an average 10-minute headway). G riders make twice as many transfers as the average subway rider; this high transfer rate is inconvenient for customers who must wait for multiple trains. Trains shorter than the platform length cause uncertainty about where the G train stops, contributing to uneven passenger loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Received
    Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Received from the Legislature and the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Laws of 2009 February 1, 2011 through July 31, 2011 Metropolitan Transportation Authority Office of Legislative and Community Input Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Laws of 2009 February 1, 2011 through July 31, 2011 Senate, Legislator's Name of Date Request/Concern/ Close Out Agency/Tracking Assembly or Name (none Legislator's or Agency Response Received Recommendation Expressed Date PCAC if PCAC) PCAC Contact Complaints received about NYCT personnel at the Fresh Pond Nolan, Parking is very limited in the depot and elsewhere but they will try to have personnel park NYCT7503 Assembly Diane Ballek 10/4/10 Depot parking their private vehicles on the streets adjacent to 2/2/2011 Catherine T. in other locations. the Depot. Pheffer, NYCT8061 Assembly Mary Lou 10/6/10 Inquiry about Rockaway park line station projects Information provided. 2/2/2011 Audrey I. LIRR993 Senate LaValle, Ken Abbondola, V. 10/22/10 Late train Provided information 4/4/2011 Site walk-thru conducted with Assembly Member Farrell at Tour conducted on 11/19 and cost estimate developed. Approval letter for use of Capital Farrell, Earnestine Bell NYCT9547 Assembly 11/19/10 155th Street Station BD concerning Assembly funded station Reserve Funds for repairs discussed during 11/19 tour sent to Assemblymember Farrell 3/11/2011 Herman D. Temple improvements on 3/11/11. Approval Pending. NYCT supervisors inspected areas cited in letter.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting
    Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting November 2020 Committee Members P. Foye, Chair N. Zuckerman, Vice Chair A. Albert J. Barbas N. Brown M. Fleischer R. Glucksman R. Herman D. Jones K. Law R. Linn D. Mack J. Samuelsen V. Tessitore Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, 11/18/2020 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 2020 Minutes from October ‘20 - Page 3 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2020 - 2021 CPOC Committee Work Plan - Page 4 4. C&D CAPITAL PROGRAM UPDATE Update on Signals and Train Control - Page 6 IEC Project Review on Queens Boulevard CBTC - Page 10 IEC Project Review on Culver Line CBTC - Page 15 IEC Project Review on 8th Avenue CBTC - Page 19 IEC Project Review on Bus Radio System - Page 24 5. UPDATE ON OMNY, MTA’s NEW FARE PAYMENT SYSTEM Update on OMNY - Page 28 IEC Project Review on OMNY - Page 36 IEC OMNY Appendix - Page 41 6. UPDATE ON SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Small Business Development Program - Page 44 7. UPDATE M/WBE, DBE, and SDVOB PARTICIPATION on CAPITAL PROJECTS M/WBE, DBE, and SDVOB Participation - Page 74 8. CAPITAL PROGRAM STATUS Commitments, Completions, and Funding Report - Page 75 MINUTES OF MEETING MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE October 28, 2020 New York, New York 10:00 A.M. Because of the ongoing COVID‐19 public health crisis, the MTA Chairman convened a one‐day, virtual Board and Committee meeting session on October 28, 2020, which included the following committees: Joint Long Island Rail Road and Metro‐North Railroad Committees; New York City Transit and MTA Bus Committee; Bridges and Tunnels Committee; Finance Committee; Audit Committee; Safety Committee; Capital Program Oversight Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Dodam Bridge
    A GLOBAL BRIDGE World’s Longest Sea Bridge NETWORK SYSTRA has been a world leader in the World’s Longest Floating Bridge fi eld of transportation infrastructure for 60 years. Bridges are a major product SHEIKH JABER AL-AHMAD AL-SABAH CAUSEWAY line and a cornerstone of our technical Kuwait MONTREAL excellence in providing safe, effi cient, PARIS SEOUL and economical solutions. SAN DIEGO EVERGREEN POINT FLOATING BRIDGE World’s Longest Span International Bridge Technologies joined Seattle, Washington Railway Cable-Stayed Bridge NEW DELHI SYSTRA in 2017. The two companies DUBAI have combined their complementary World’s Longest technical expertise to offer specialized Concrete Span engineering services in all facets of bridge TIANXINGZHOU BRIDGE design, construction, and maintenance. China World’s Fastest Design & SYSTRA’s Global Bridge Network consists Construction Supervision on any Metro Project of over 350 bridge specialists deployed 3rd PANAMA CANAL CROSSING worldwide, with Bridge Design Centers Colón, Panama World’s Longest located in San Diego, Montreal, São Paolo, Double Suspension Bridge SÃO PAOLO Paris, Dubai, New Delhi, and Seoul. MECCA (MMMP) METRO Saudi Arabia CHACAO BRIDGE BRIDGE DESIGN CENTERS Chacao, Chile • SERVICES • Tender Preparation • BIM / BrIM • Conceptual Design • Complex Drafting & Specialized Detailing • Pre-Bid Engineering • Realistic Graphics • Proposal Preparation - 3D Renderings - Visual Animation • Specifications Preparation - Construction Sequence Animation • Bids Analysis • Technical Assistance During Construction
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 a Ctivity Repor T
    MOBILITIESMOBILITISED 2020 ACTIVITY REPORT 2020 ACTIVITY 2020 ACTIVITY REPORT 1 MOBILITIES MOBILISED "% ' ǎ to a grinding halt. It also shed light on our basic needs, one of which is T $ " %% ǎ$ ' %% $ ǎ $" ǎ ǎ ǎ$ǎ This instance of global immobility, once completely unthinkable, underscored '$'$ % ǎ" " ' $' "ǎ ' " $ǎ "ǎ & " most basic rights. " ' ǎ % " business is all about. As paths to recovery begin to emerge, we felt it was " " % "" include insights from people outside the company. Mobility is key to a broad ' "ǎ '$ % & ' " % & $ "ǎ " % & is also highly valued by the SYSTRA Group, and means we can take strides towards a sustainable and resilient future. We hope you enjoy reading this report. This instance of global immobility, once completely unthinkable, underscored the importance of mobility at every level. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACTIVITY REPORT ACTIVITY MOBILITY & 12 TERRITORIES 04 MOBILISED MOBILITY & 16 ENVIRONMENT MOBILITY & 08 URBAN TRANSPORT THE SYSTRA GROUP IN 2020 20 Message from Pierre Verzat, 32 Mobilised to innovate Chief Executive Officer sustainably 21Message from 36 At the forefront of the Supervisory Board sustainable development 22Review of 2020 38 Governance 28Ready to accelerate 41 Financial results 30 A global player 3 PERSPECTIVES ON MOBILITIES 4 ACTIVITY REPORT ACTIVITY MOBILISED MANAGEMENT IN CRISIS OR MANAGEMENT CRISIS? BASED ON AN INTERVIEW WITH BARBARA Z. LARSON Executive Professor of Management, USA $ "ǎ "ǎ %% "" " " ' " ǎ $" ǎ 5 FOCUS & W %ǎ! $ " %' %'"" " % " % ǎ ǎ HS2: WHEN THE WORLD "" &" %$ COMES TO A STANDSTILL, & ǎ "ǎ WE STILL HAVE PEOPLE % " 'c )* This is one of the biggest projects ever undertaken ' +" by SYSTRA anywhere in the world. Mobilising 700 employees " $' and seven production centres, High Speed 2 (HS2) cc% % is shaping the future of British rail and underlining 0 %% 1 $ the UK’s ability to meet the challenge of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility and Analysis of Fexpress Service in Brooklyn May 2016
    Feasibility and Analysis of F Express Service in Brooklyn May 2016 MN F Brooklyn F Express Study Table of Contents I. Introduction 6 II. Population and Ridership 8 Recent Trends in Ridership 12 Projected Future Growth in Corridor 16 III. History of Brooklyn F Express 18 Comparisons to Other Express Corridors 20 IV. Current Express Option 21 Limits on Total F Service 26 Limits on Span of F Express 27 V. Express Ridership and Travel Time Savings 27 Potential Shift from Other Corridors 33 Loading Impacts 33 Station Impacts 35 VI. Recommendations 36 MN 1 F Brooklyn F Express Study List of Figures Figure 1 – Culver Line Track Configuration 7 Figure 2 – Population Density, F Corridor 9 Figure 3 – Labor Force as % of Population, F Corridor 10 Figure 4 – F Line Station Weekday Entries and Growth by Segment, 1998-2014 13 Figure 5 – F Line Peak Hour Load Trend 14 Figure 6 – Projected Population Growth, 2015-2035 17 Figure 7 – History of F Train Service Patterns 19 Figure 8 – Proposed F Express Pattern 22 Figure 9 – Current Conditions at Bergen St Lower Level 25 Figure 10 – AM Travel Time Savings by Entry Station, Church Av to Jay St Express 30 Figure 11 – PM Travel Time Savings by Entry Station, Church Av to Jay St Express 32 List of Tables Table 1 – Northbound AM Peak Hour Ridership Profile 11 Table 2 – 2014 Average F Peak Hour Passenger Volume and Percent of Guideline Capacity 12 Table 3 – Culver Line Change in Weekday Entries by Hour, 2007-2014 15 Table 4 – Comparison of Selected Express/Local Corridors 21 Table 5 – Test Train Travel Times (Minutes) 25 Table 6 – Travel Time Impacts Between Selected Station Pairs, AM Peak* 28 Table 7 – Impacts to Riders by Magnitude of Travel Time Impact, Jay St to Church Av Express, AM Peak Hour 29 Table 8 – Impacts to Riders by Magnitude of Travel Time Impact, Jay St to Church Av Express, PM Peak Hour 31 Table 9 – Current and Projected Northbound Departing Loads by Station, AM Peak Hour 34 MN 2 F Brooklyn F Express Study Executive Summary NYCT has prepared this study of F express service on the Culver line in Brooklyn.
    [Show full text]
  • Signer Pour Une Mobilité Durable
    SIGNER POUR UNE MOBILITÉ DURABLE RAPPORT D’ACTIVITÉ 2019 SOMMAIRE 2-5 VISION D’ENSEMBLE 2-3 MESSAGE DE LA DIRECTION 4-5 MODÈLE D’AFFAIRES 6-15 STRATÉGIE 6-7 INTERVIEW CROISÉE 8-9 CHIFFRES CLÉS 2019 10-15 RÉFÉRENCES RAPPORT D’ACTIVITÉ 2019 ŒUVRER POUR UNE MOBILITÉ DURABLE 16-35 18 S’ENGAGER POUR L’ENVIRONNEMENT 24 INNOVER DURABLEMENT POUR L’AVENIR 30 PRENDRE NOTRE RESPONSABILITÉ SOCIÉTALE GOUVERNANCE 36-37 DIRECTOIRE ET COMITÉ EXÉCUTIF 38 CONSEIL DE SURVEILLANCE 39-40 RÉSULTATS FINANCIERS 36-40 2 VISION D’ENSEMBLE MESSAGE DE LA DIRECTION ÉDITO “Pour faire émerger des solutions de transport qui ont du sens pour notre époque et celle à venir, il est urgent de penser à long terme.” PIERRE VERZAT PRÉSIDENT DU DIRECTOIRE Ā" "" Ā au défi de penser des systèmes vertueux capables la gestion de leurs infrastructures, avec un niveau Ā " " Ā"ǎ ÈĀ " de répondre aux besoins les plus immédiats sans toujours plus élevé de sécurité. En bref, que nous &ǎ $ǎ $ǎ " Ā mettre en péril les capacités de développement leur apportions des solutions soutenant leurs " " "$ Ā & des générations futures. En servant nos clients objectifs de résilience et que nous leur donnions ÈĀ$ Ā È" et en allant toujours plus loin dans le caractère les moyens d’assurer le meilleur avenir pour leurs " " " È È durable de nos propositions dans toutes leurs concitoyens. Nous avons fait de l’écoconception $ " "" "ǎ dimensions, c’est notre utilité sociétale que nous un levier important de notre offre de conseil et "$ ū développons. Nos projets ont du sens parce d’ingénierie, un objectif dynamique et évolutif Le changement climatique teste notre capacité que ceux qui les mènent ont à cœur d’avoir toujours à la pointe des besoins, nous permettant à adapter nos méthodes éprouvées et à en une influence positive sur la vie de millions de de conserver un temps d’avance.
    [Show full text]
  • How We Got to Coney Island
    How We Got to Coney Island .......................... 9627$$ $$FM 06-28-04 08:03:55 PS .......................... 9627$$ $$FM 06-28-04 08:03:55 PS How We Got to Coney Island THE DEVELOPMENT OF MASS TRANSPORTATION IN BROOKLYN AND KINGS COUNTY BRIAN J. CUDAHY Fordham University Press New York 2002 .......................... 9627$$ $$FM 06-28-04 08:03:55 PS Copyright ᭧ 2002 by Fordham University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means— electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cudahy, Brian J. How we got to Coney Island : the development of mass transportation in Brooklyn and Kings County / Brian J. Cudahy. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8232-2208-X (cloth)—ISBN 0-8232-2209-8 (pbk.) 1. Local transit—New York Metropolitan Area—History. 2. Transportation—New York Metropolitan Area—History. 3. Coney Island (New York, N.Y.)—History. I. Title. HE4491.N65 C8 2002 388.4Ј09747Ј23—dc21 2002009084 Printed in the United States of America 02 03 04 05 06 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition .......................... 9627$$ $$FM 06-28-04 08:03:55 PS CONTENTS Foreword vii Preface xiii 1. A Primer on Coney Island and Brooklyn 1 2. Street Railways (1854–1890) 24 3. Iron Piers and Iron Steamboats (1845–1918) 49 4. Excursion Railways (1864–1890) 67 5. Elevated Railways (1880–1890) 104 6.
    [Show full text]