DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture #18: Ainu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Lecture #2: Ainu Ainu are the only indigenous ethnic minority of Japan recognized by the Japanese government (as of 1997; see below). A very small minority. Official population figure is about 25,000, and has been remarkably constant over the last 200 years (see stats below). Ainu culture found in Kuril islands and Sakhalin as well as Hokkaido. Some Key Ainu Words Ainu = People Moshiri/Mosir = World Ainu Moshiri (“The Quiet Land Where Humans Live”) = The Ainu land, Hokkaido. Utari = Comrade, fellow Kamuy / Kamui = Gods Chise = An Ainu house Kotan = A hamlet of 4 or more chise Ekashi = Headman, senior male of kotan Kotankorokur = Bigger headman, for group of kotan Ukocaranke Lit. "To let words fall mutually." = Ainu practice of settling disputes by arguing extensively. (Kayano 1994 p. 25). Cf. Quaker tradition. Aysirosi = Ainu coat of arms (Japanese: kamon 家紋). "An inscription carved at the end of a poisoned trap arrow used for hunting bear and deer. Aysirosi of Shigeru Kayano’s ancestors (Kayano 1994: 24) Iyomante = Ainu bear-killing ritual Ainu view of nature: If you take anything from nature, you must ‘return the spirit to the gods’ (kamuy). Hence in the Iyomante, the spirit of the dead bear is sent back to the gods. Not just animals – trees, fruit etc. have spirits (similar to Shinto belief: pantheistic 汎神論). *Sekuma-Pause-Kamuy – Bear gods *Kamuy Ni – Tree gods 1 *Kamuy Nonno – Flower gods *Failure to return the spirit will be punished – by bad luck, disease etc. (Sjoberg 1993: 59). Traditional beliefs and respect for nature have prevented Ainu from taking too much – Ainu society reckoned to be ecologically sound. * Gender practices Women generally viewed as inferior. * Separate toilets for men and women behind the chise. * Women’s labor valued lower than men’s (less dangerous, not done in groups…) “In our society we men take care of important tasks. It is our belief that women, because of their awful smell, which comes from menstruating women, will chase the Kamuy away from us. We cannot afford this. It is too risky to let women handle important tasks. Clearly, you must see that.” (Ainu Ekashi [headman] interviewed in Hidaka by Katarina Sjoberg in 1988 (Sjoberg 1993: 60). Japanese as seen by Ainu Shisam シサム / Shisham / Shinsham = “Fellow traders” Shamo シャモ = impolite form of Shisam, “people you can’t trust.” Wajin 和人= Mainland/Yamato Japanese. “People of Wa.” “Yamato people.” (Japanese term often used by Ainu Folkcrafts Nowadays Ainu designs are very popular with Japanese and other non-Ainu people, especially wood-carving and fabrics. Perhaps the most famous item is the tunic, woven from bark fiber (attush) or cotton (chikarkarpe, kaparamip, ruunpe). For some beautiful examples, use these words as internet search terms or check out the Ainu Museum site: http://www.ainu-museum.or.jp/en/ * Ainu-Wajin History Ainu used to be called ‘Emishi’, and Hokkaido ‘Ezo’ (sometimes Romanized as ‘Yezo’). “Their men and women live together promiscuously, there is no distinction of father and child. In winter they dwell in holes, in summer they live in nests. Their clothing consists 2 of furs, and they drink blood…” Account of Emishi in the Nihonshoki (historical records composed c.720 a.d., claiming to describe Emishi several hundred years earlier), in Siddle 1996: 27. No agreement among archaeologists on the origins of the Ainu, but probably at least two ethnic groups populated Ezo in prehistoric times. By the 9th century there were 2 distinct cultures: Satsumon and Okhotsk. Today’s Ainu are thought to be descended from the latter. 13th Century. Emergence of today’s Ainu culture on Hokkaido, the Kuril islands and Southern Sakhalin. First records of trading with clans living in North-eastern Honshu. 15th century. Wajin trading settlements dotted around southern Hokkaido. Wajin hunters, blacksmiths and traders active. 1456 Wajin blacksmith kills an Ainu in a quarrel over a blunt knife. Major diplomatic incident. 1457 Ainu led by Koshamain destroy all but 2 settlements. Wajin almost expelled from Ezo. A century of intermittent warfare follows. 1551 Leading Japanese clan in northeast, the Kakizakis, reaches peace and trade agreement with local Ainu. Trading profits to be split 50-50. Kakzakis take possession of small stretch of land on southern tip of Ezo… first incorporation of Ainu land into mainland Japan. 1599 Kakizaki family takes clan name ‘Matsumae’ 松前藩 1604 Recognized by Tokugawa shogunate, a big step towards becoming part of Japan. Gets trade monopoly with Ezo, gradually starts to dominate trade with Ainu. 1653 Shakushain (legendary Ainu warrior-hero) becomes leader of Menashunkur Ainu, engaged in bitter territorial dispute with Shumunkur Ainu (both in Hidaka region, Southern Hokkaido.) 1655 Both groups accept Matsumae clan offers to mediate, but incidents continue. 1668 Shakushain’s men ambush and kill Onibishi, while he is conferring with leader of local Wajin miners. 1669 Shakushain succeeds in uniting Ainu in uprising against Matsumae clan. 200 to 400 Wajin killed. Matsumae clan sends army with firearms; rebellion suppressed. Shakushain invited to peace negotiations and treacherously assassinated. 1789 Last major Ainu uprising. 71 Wajin killed in Kunashiri and Nemuro. Uprising put down by Matsumae aided by local Ainu leader; 37 Ainu executed. 1821 Matsumae Clan given full control of southern Ezo by Bakufu (Shogunate). Ainu forbidden to speak Japanese or practice Japanese customs. 3 Workers sent from Honshu to develop Ezo bring new diseases. Ainu population reduced sharply. Ainu Population in Western Ezo declined from 9,068 in 1798 to 4,384 in 1854 1855 Bakufu commences assimilation policy. Ainu are to be ‘Japanized.’ Now they MUST learn Japanese and practice Japanese customs. 1869 Northern island (Ainu Moshiri in Ainu language) renamed from Ezo (sometimes romanized as ‘Yezo’ to ‘Hokkaido’ (北海道, lit. ‘North Sea Land’). 1899 ‘Hokkaido Former Aborigines Protection Law’ (北海道旧土人保護法)passed: in force until 1997. Key point: Ainu encouraged to abandon traditional hunting & fishing lifestyle and settle down to become farmers. Land allocated to those who agree to do so. 20th century Hokkaido development Japanese government starts building railways, coal and metal mines, fishing ports etc. in Hokkaido. Natural resources needed for hunting, fishing, gathering are impounded or destroyed. Ainu used as part of the labor force to develop the island, alongside convicts and indentured laborers. Summary of Japan’s vacillating policies toward Ainu Japanese side Ainu Policy Objective Shogunate ( 幕 府 ）Turn Ainu into ‘civilized’ Japanese Assimilation pre-1821 同化、同質化 Matsumae clan (松前藩）Forbid Ainu from using Japanese Separation post 1821 language, customs 区別化 Meiji 明治 govt Preserve culture of ‘dying’ Ainu race Separation / 1869-1899 extinction Meiji govt 1899 Grant Japanese citizenship, teach Japanese Assimilation Rise of Ainu ethnic movement 1930 Launch of Ainu Association アイヌ協会）, a moderate group that favors assimilation with Japanese. 1945 Loss of momentum as Japan’s pure-blooded ideology strengthens (Nihonjinron) 1961 Ainu Kyokai renamed Utari Kyokai, using Ainu word for ‘Our People’ 1963 Membership is just 770. 1968-1973: Expansion 1968 Japanese govt celebrates 100 years of developing Hokkaido, angering Ainu. 1970s Movement grows, helped by mounting international support for indigenous peoples. 4 1973 1st Utari welfare measures: ¥12 billion of national and local govt funding, administered by Utari Association. 1976 Utari Membership 8,540 (2,103 households; nearly half Ainu population) Utari Association’s nature: Made up mainly of wealthy farmers and businessmen; close links to LDP; 3 main campaigning issues: education, housing, livelihood. As Japan gradually becomes aware of responsibilities to Ainu, government money starts to become available for Ainu culture preservation projects etc., Utari Assoc increasingly cooperates with Govt. Young radical Ainu suspect ‘co-option’ and leave Utari Association. 1980 Japanese government denies Ainu exist in statement to UN. 1986 Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone’s famous statement that “there are no ethnic minorities in Japan.” 1992 Ainu representatives invited to testify before UN Committee on Indigenous Rights. 1994 Shigeru Kayano elected to the upper house of the Diet for the Japan Socialist Party. First Ainu ever elected to national parliament. Makes inaugural speech partly in Ainu. 1997 Govt finally recognizes Ainu status as independent ethnic group: “The Ainu, who lived in Hokkaido before the arrival of Wajin at least at the end of medieval times, have been recognized as a race that has original traditions and that developed a unique culture including the Ainu language, which is based on a different linguistic system from the Japanese language, as well as original manners and customs.” (Prime Minister's Office Announcement No. 25; September 18, 1997) July 1997 Ainu Rights Law passed •Replaces 1899 Hokkaido Former Aborigine Protection Law; recognizes the Ainu as the indigenous people of Hokkaido; requires municipal governments to protect and promote Ainu culture… but no mention of land rights. Who is Ainu? 1997 law defines an Ainu person as: (1) A person who considers himself or herself to be Ainu, OR (2) a person of Ainu ancestry, OR (3) a person who has become Ainu by marriage or adoption. There is an opt-out clause: you can choose not to be Ainu. Is everything OK now? Not necessarily. Announcing a 2000 report on effects of the new law, Kazuyuki Yamamaru, 51, chairman of the Ainu Museum in Shiraoicho, Hokkaido, said that even 5 after the enactment of the law, many Ainu people still did not want to reveal their identity for fear of discrimination. The concept of cultural pride was not widespread. * Asked if they had recently faced discrimination, such as being rejected by potential marriage partners, 12.4 percent said yes -- up 5.1% points from the previous survey held in 1993, before the enactment of the new law. 15.7 percent of the pollees, a rise of 5.6 points, said that they had heard of other Ainu people suffering discrimination (as reported in Yomiuri Shinbun).
Recommended publications
  • Japan Has Still Yet to Recognize Ryukyu/Okinawan Peoples

    Japan Has Still Yet to Recognize Ryukyu/Okinawan Peoples

    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Alternative Report Submission: Violations of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Japan Prepared for 128th Session, Geneva, 2 March - 27 March, 2020 Submitted by Cultural Survival Cultural Survival 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02140 Tel: 1 (617) 441 5400 [email protected] www.culturalsurvival.org International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Alternative Report Submission: Violations of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Japan I. Reporting Organization Cultural Survival is an international Indigenous rights organization with a global Indigenous leadership and consultative status with ECOSOC since 2005. Cultural Survival is located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and is registered as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization in the United States. Cultural Survival monitors the protection of Indigenous Peoples’ rights in countries throughout the world and publishes its findings in its magazine, the Cultural Survival Quarterly, and on its website: www.cs.org. II. Introduction The nation of Japan has made some significant strides in addressing historical issues of marginalization and discrimination against the Ainu Peoples. However, Japan has not made the same effort to address such issues regarding the Ryukyu Peoples. Both Peoples have been subject to historical injustices such as suppression of cultural practices and language, removal from land, and discrimination. Today, Ainu individuals continue to suffer greater rates of discrimination, poverty and lower rates of academic success compared to non-Ainu Japanese citizens. Furthermore, the dialogue between the government of Japan and the Ainu Peoples continues to be lacking. The Ryukyu Peoples continue to not be recognized as Indigenous by the Japanese government and face the nonconsensual use of their traditional lands by the United States military.
  • Special Article 3 an Interview with Chu Wen-Ching, Advisor & Director, Taipei Cultural Center, Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in Japan

    Special Article 3 an Interview with Chu Wen-Ching, Advisor & Director, Taipei Cultural Center, Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in Japan

    Special Article 3 An Interview with Chu Wen-Ching, Advisor & Director, Taipei Cultural Center, Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in Japan By Japan SPOTLIGHT Editorial Section The last issue highlighted Japanese soft power. Soft power is in particular important in consolidating close diplomatic relations with a neighboring country. In this issue Japan SPOTLIGHT highlights Taiwan and Taiwan-Japan cultural exchanges in an interview with a senior Taiwanese expert on culture, Chu Wen- Ching, advisor and director at the Taipei Cultural Center. Q: How do you assess the current Japanese NHK programs can always be status of cultural exchanges seen in Taiwan, as Taiwanese Cable TV has between Taiwan and Japan? a contract with NHK. Japanese folk singers like Sachiko Kobayashi, Shinichi Mori, Chu: We have a very close relationship in Sayuri Ishikawa, and Hiroshi Itsuki are also terms of trade and human exchanges. Our very popular. Masaharu Fukuyama, another bilateral trade totaled $62 billion last year famous Japanese singer, was recently and the number of tourists coming and appointed by the Taiwanese Tourism going between us will soon reach 4 million. Bureau as an ambassador of tourism for I have recently heard that there were a Taiwan and he is expected to volunteer to number of Taiwanese tourists who could introduce in his Japanese radio program not reserve air tickets to Japan to see the Taiwanese cuisine and culture to his cherry blossoms in April this year because audience. there were not enough vacancies. As this Taiwanese rock group Mayday and episode shows, human exchanges between Japanese pop-rock band flumpool are good us have recently been significantly friends, and often visit each other, while increasing.
  • Pictures of an Island Kingdom Depictions of Ryūkyū in Early Modern Japan

    Pictures of an Island Kingdom Depictions of Ryūkyū in Early Modern Japan

    PICTURES OF AN ISLAND KINGDOM DEPICTIONS OF RYŪKYŪ IN EARLY MODERN JAPAN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ART HISTORY MAY 2012 By Travis Seifman Thesis Committee: John Szostak, Chairperson Kate Lingley Paul Lavy Gregory Smits Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter I: Handscroll Paintings as Visual Record………………………………. 18 Chapter II: Illustrated Books and Popular Discourse…………………………. 33 Chapter III: Hokusai Ryūkyū Hakkei: A Case Study……………………………. 55 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………. 78 Appendix: Figures …………………………………………………………………………… 81 Works Cited ……………………………………………………………………………………. 106 ii Abstract This paper seeks to uncover early modern Japanese understandings of the Ryūkyū Kingdom through examination of popular publications, including illustrated books and woodblock prints, as well as handscroll paintings depicting Ryukyuan embassy processions within Japan. The objects examined include one such handscroll painting, several illustrated books from the Sakamaki-Hawley Collection, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Library, and Hokusai Ryūkyū Hakkei, an 1832 series of eight landscape prints depicting sites in Okinawa. Drawing upon previous scholarship on the role of popular publishing in forming conceptions of “Japan” or of “national identity” at this time, a media discourse approach is employed to argue that such publications can serve as reliable indicators of understandings
  • Ainu Imaginary, Ethnicity and Assimilation

    Ainu Imaginary, Ethnicity and Assimilation

    The Fight for Self-Representation: Ainu Imaginary, Ethnicity and Assimilation Marcos P. Centeno Martín Abstract: Film representation of the Ainu people is as old as cinema but it has not remained stable over time. From the origins of cinema, Ainu people were an object of interest for Japanese and foreign explorers who portrayed them as an Other, savage and isolated from the modern world. The notion of “otherness” was slightly modified during wartime, as the Ainu were represented as Japanese subjects within the “imperial family”, and at the end of the fifties when entertainment cinema presented the Ainu according to the codes of the Hollywood Western on the one hand; and Mikio Naruse proposed a new portrayal focusing on the Ainu as a long-discriminated social collective rather than as an ethnic group, on the other. However, Tadayoshi Himeda’s series of seven documentaries following the Ainu leader Shigeru Kayano’s activities marked a significant shift in Ainu iconography. Himeda challenged both the postwar institutional discourse on the inexistence of minorities in Japan, and the touristic and ahistorical image that concealed the Ainu’s cultural assimilation to Japanese culture. The proposed films do not try to show an exotic people but a conventional people struggling to recover their collective past. Shifts in Ainu Film Representations The relationship between film and the Ainu people is as old as cinema. They are featured in The Ainu in Yeso (Les Aïnous à Yéso, 1897), which are two of the first thirty-three cinematographic sequences shot in Japan as part of the actualités filmed by the French operator François-Constant Girel for a Lumière brothers catalogue.
  • The Issue of Diversity and Multiculturalism in Japan

    The Issue of Diversity and Multiculturalism in Japan

    Jie Qi & Sheng Ping Zhang The Issue of Diversity and Multiculturalism in Japan THE ISSUE OF DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTURALISM IN JAPAN Jie Qi Utsunomiya University, Japan Sheng Ping Zhang Meijo University, Japan Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association March 24-29, 2008 New York In Session: Internationalization and Globalization in the Curriculum 1 Jie Qi & Sheng Ping Zhang The Issue of Diversity and Multiculturalism in Japan THE ISSUE OF DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTYRALISM IN JAPAN The purpose of this paper is to problematize that which has been taken for granted about the notion of multiculturalism in Japan. Multiculturalism is a novel issue in Japan. As the Japanese government started to promote “internationalization” since 1980’s, slogans such as “international exchange,” “cultural exchange,” “understanding of other cultures,” etc, have become the most popular hackneyed expressions among policy maker and educators. This paper demonstrates that the notion of multiculturalism in Japan is intricately and deeply embedded in Japanese society, Japanese culture and the Japanese educational system and that this type of multiculturalism excludes ethnic groups which have lived in Japan since old times. Firstly, the intention in this study is to interrupt the assumptions about homogeneous nation in Japanese educational discourse as have been accepted since the end of World War II. I assert that Japan is not homogeneous nation rather a society with diverse cultural groups. Secondly, this paper traces the path of the past notion of multiculturalism as embodied in the Japanese political, social and cultural conditions. In undertaking this I first look at the way cultural studies emerged in the 1980’s which created a new image of cultural studies.
  • A Brief Summary of Japanese-Ainu Relations and the Depiction of The

    A Brief Summary of Japanese-Ainu Relations and the Depiction of The

    The road from Ainu barbarian to Japanese primitive: A brief summary of Japanese-ainu relations in a historical perspective Noémi GODEFROY Centre d’Etudes Japonaises (CEJ) “Populations Japonaises” Research Group Proceedings from the 3rd Consortium for Asian and African Studies (CAAS) “Making a difference: representing/constructing the other in Asian/African Media, Cinema and languages”, 16-18 February 2012, published by OFIAS at the Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, p.201-212 Edward Saïd, in his ground-breaking work Orientalism, underlines that to represent the “Other” is to manipulate him. This has been an instrument of submission towards Asia during the age of European expansion, but the use of such a process is not confined to European domination. For centuries, the relationship between Japan and its northern neighbors, the Ainu, is based on economical domination and dependency. In this regard, the Ainu’s foreignness, impurity and “barbaric appearance” - their qualities as inferior “Others” - are emphasized in descriptive texts or by the regular staging of such diplomatic practices as “barbarian audiences”, thus highlighting the Japanese cultural and territorial superiority. But from 1868, the construction of the Meiji nation-state requires the assimilation and acculturation of the Ainu people. As Japan undergoes what Fukuzawa Yukichi refers to as the “opening to civilization” (文明開化 bunmei kaika) by learning from the West, it also plays the role of the civilizer towards the Ainu. The historical case study of the relationship between Japanese and Ainu from up to Meiji highlights the evolution of Japan’s own self-image and identity, from an emerging state, subduing barbarians, to newly unified state - whose ultramarine relations are inspired by a Chinese-inspired ethnocentrism and rejection of outside influence- during the Edo period, and finally to an aspiring nation-state, seeking to assert itself while avoiding colonization at Meiji.
  • Sea of Japan a Maritime Perspective on Indo-Pacific Security

    Sea of Japan a Maritime Perspective on Indo-Pacific Security

    The Long Littoral Project: Sea of Japan A Maritime Perspective on Indo-Pacific Security Michael A. McDevitt • Dmitry Gorenburg Cleared for Public Release IRP-2013-U-002322-Final February 2013 Strategic Studies is a division of CNA. This directorate conducts analyses of security policy, regional analyses, studies of political-military issues, and strategy and force assessments. CNA Strategic Studies is part of the global community of strategic studies institutes and in fact collaborates with many of them. On the ground experience is a hallmark of our regional work. Our specialists combine in-country experience, language skills, and the use of local primary-source data to produce empirically based work. All of our analysts have advanced degrees, and virtually all have lived and worked abroad. Similarly, our strategists and military/naval operations experts have either active duty experience or have served as field analysts with operating Navy and Marine Corps commands. They are skilled at anticipating the “problem after next” as well as determining measures of effectiveness to assess ongoing initiatives. A particular strength is bringing empirical methods to the evaluation of peace-time engagement and shaping activities. The Strategic Studies Division’s charter is global. In particular, our analysts have proven expertise in the following areas: The full range of Asian security issues The full range of Middle East related security issues, especially Iran and the Arabian Gulf Maritime strategy Insurgency and stabilization Future national security environment and forces European security issues, especially the Mediterranean littoral West Africa, especially the Gulf of Guinea Latin America The world’s most important navies Deterrence, arms control, missile defense and WMD proliferation The Strategic Studies Division is led by Dr.
  • Performing Ethnic Harmony: the Japanese Government's Plans for A

    Performing Ethnic Harmony: the Japanese Government's Plans for A

    Volume 16 | Issue 21 | Number 2 | Article ID 5212 | Nov 01, 2018 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Performing Ethnic Harmony: The Japanese Government’s Plans for a New Ainu Law Tessa Morris-Suzuki Dancing Towards Understanding a little more closely at the way in which the pursuit of indigenous rights has played out in On 14 May 2018 the Japanese government’s Japan over the past three decades or so. Council for Ainu Policy Promotion accepted a report sketching the core features of a much- In 1997 Japan finally abolished the awaited new Ainu law which the Abeassimilationist ‘Former Aborigines Protection government hopes to put in place by 2020.1 The Law’ which had governed Ainu affairs for law is the outcome of a long process of debate, almost a century, and replaced it with a new protest and legislative change that has taken ‘Ainu Cultural Promotion Law’. The change place as global approaches to indigenous rights came after more than ten years of protest by have been transformed. In 2007, Japan was Ainu groups. In 1984, the Utari Association of among the 144 countries whose vote secured Hokkaido (since renamed the Ainu Association the adoption of the 2007 UN Declaration on the of Hokkaido) had called for the creation of a Rights of Indigenous Peoples: a declaration New Ainu Law which, if implemented, would which (amongst other things) confirms the have created guaranteed seats for Ainu rights of indigenous peoples to the land they representatives in Parliament and local traditionally occupied and the resources they assemblies, promoted
  • May 2020 1(4)

    May 2020 1(4)

    What’s in this issue Welcome Message Eye on Japan Tokyo Days – report by Nadine Willems Piece of Japan Upcoming Events General Links Editor: Oliver Moxham, CJS Project Coordinator CJS Director: Professor Simon Kaner Contact Us Header photo by editor Welcome Message CJS ニュースレターへようこそ！ Welcome to the first May edition of the CJS e-newsletter. This week we are happy to bring you positive news from Japan on handling of the pandemic as infection rates continue to slow after a thankfully quiet Golden Week and the government finally accepts that the virus may not simply disappear by the end of May. We have inspiring stories of human kindness in Japan to keep spirits up, a brand new article from Nadine Willems on the trials of acquiring masks in lockdown Tokyo and a raft of cultural goodies on the theme of humanity versus nature in our Piece of Japan segment. You can find a message from CJS Director Professor Simon Kaner on the Sainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures website and hear more from our SISJAC colleagues on their monthly e-bulletin. We hope you enjoy reading and as ever look forward to hearing from you on what you would like to see in future issues. Written by Oliver Moxham, CJS Project Coordinator and editor Editor’s note: Japanese names are given in the Japanese form of family name first i.e. Matsumoto Mariko Eye on Japan: Quiet Golden Week|Flattening the Curve|Castles in the Spotlight 日本の最新情報 As Golden Week passes by with World Heritage Sites on high alert for daring sightseers, it would seem that most heeded the calls to at least not travel, if not stay indoors.
  • Rethinking Borders in Japan: Internal, Cultural, and Geopolitical

    Rethinking Borders in Japan: Internal, Cultural, and Geopolitical

    REVIEW ESSAY Rethinking Borders in Japan: Internal, Cultural, and Geopolitical Ingyu Oh, Korea University Christopher Bondy. Voice, Silence, and Self: Negotiations of Buraku Identity in Contemporary Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2015. 184 pp. $40 (cloth). Koichi Iwabuchi. Resilient Borders and Cultural Diversity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2015. 137 pp. $75 (cloth/e-book). Akihiro Iwashita. Japan’s Border Issues: Pitfalls and Prospects. New York: Routledge, 2016. 144 pp. $160 (cloth). The books reviewed here address three different borders in present-day Japanese society: internal, cultural, and geopolitical. It is rare for three different authors to concurrently publish monographs on Japanese borders from three different angles. This may be a sign of increasing consciousness within Japan on the issues of diversity, multiethnicity, old and new forms of discrimination, and continuing border conflicts with neighboring countries. As Christopher Bondy clearly delineates in his book, most Japanese remain “silent” about the internal borders— that is, the social (i.e., status and class), ethnic, and racial divisions with invisible or sometimes geographically demarcated borders drawn within Japanese society in order to differentiate one group of human beings from another. Koichi Iwabuchi, however, posits that the cultural border in Japan is more severely attacked by conservatives and political extremists than the internal borders that are demarcated by socioeconomic classes, gender, and ethnicity. As cultural borders are intended to open up Japan to embrace diversity and multiculturalism, the nationalist internal borders remain firmly shut against the non-Japanese groups that migrate in and out of Japan with their own local cultures and identities.
  • Crania Japonica: Ethnographic Portraiture, Scientific Discourse, and the Fashioning of Ainu/Japanese Colonial Identities

    Crania Japonica: Ethnographic Portraiture, Scientific Discourse, and the Fashioning of Ainu/Japanese Colonial Identities

    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Fall 1-7-2020 Crania Japonica: Ethnographic Portraiture, Scientific Discourse, and the Fashioning of Ainu/Japanese Colonial Identities Jeffrey Braytenbah Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Asian History Commons, and the Asian Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Braytenbah, Jeffrey, "Crania Japonica: Ethnographic Portraiture, Scientific Discourse, and the ashioningF of Ainu/Japanese Colonial Identities" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5356. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7229 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Crania Japonica: Ethnographic Portraiture, Scientific Discourse, and the Fashioning of Ainu/Japanese Colonial Identities by Jeff Braytenbah A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Thesis Committee: Kenneth J. Ruoff, Chair Laura Robson Jennifer Tappan Portland State University 2019 © 2019 Jeff Braytenbah Abstract Japan’s colonial activities on the island of Hokkaido were instrumental to the creation of modern Japanese national identity. Within this construction, the indigenous Ainu people came to be seen in dialectical opposition to the 'modern' and 'civilized' identity that Japanese colonial actors fashioned for themselves. This process was articulated through travel literature, ethnographic portraiture, and discourse in scientific racism which racialized perceived divisions between the Ainu and Japanese and contributed to the unmaking of the Ainu homeland: Ainu Mosir.
  • Japanese Homogeneity and Processes of Racialisation and Their Effects on the Korean Population Living in Japan

    Japanese Homogeneity and Processes of Racialisation and Their Effects on the Korean Population Living in Japan

    CERS Working Paper 2016 Abigail Witherwick Japanese homogeneity and processes of racialisation and their effects on the Korean population living in Japan Introduction I have decided to focus on Japan as part of this research into the processes of racialisation within a country outside of the UK. Japan is an interesting country to look at when researching the different processes of racialisation in different countries as it frequently claims that it is a homogenous, raceless society (Iwabuchi and Takezawa, 2015), despite this statement being politically incorrect. According to the Central Intelligence Agency (2015), 98.5% of the Japanese population are Japanese, 0.5% are Koreans, 0.4% are Chinese, and 0.6% are other. This demonstrates that the numbers of foreigners living in Japan are small; however, there are still large numbers of Koreans and Chinese living there. An OHCHR report by the UN (2005) concluded that there is racial discrimination and xenophobia in Japan which affects three groups; the Buraku people, the Ainu and the people of Okianawa, descendents of Japanese colonies (Koreans and Chinese), and foreigners and migrants from other Asian countries and from the rest of the world. Minorities are marginalised through their access to education, employment, health and housing (OHCHR, 2005). There is no national legislation that outlaws racial discrimination and provides a judicial remedy for the victims of racial prejudices (OHCHR, 2005). Iwabuchi and Takezawa (2015) argue that the Japanese government is reluctant to admit that there is a problem of racial discrimination, and they have internalised scientific discourses that racism is between ‘blacks’ and ‘whites’ in Africa and America.