Grundy County Transportation Priorities 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grundy County Transportation Priorities 2013 Grundy County Transportation Priorities 2013 2013 Grundy County Transportation Priorities 1 Contents Case Statement .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................................. 5 High Impact Regional Projects Map ........................................................................................................ 7 Transportation Priorities Map ................................................................................................................... 8 Project Details ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Roads ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Air ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 Rail .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Water ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Regional Maps Overview ........................................................................................................................ 12 IDOT FY 2014-2019 Highway Improvement Program – Grundy County ........................................ 16 2009 IDOT Grundy County Average Daily Traffic Count ................................................................... 18 Selected Road Impacts & Benefits ........................................................................................................ 20 Illinois Route 47 .................................................................................................................................... 24 Illinois Route 113 .................................................................................................................................. 26 Ridge Road ........................................................................................................................................... 27 US Route 6 ............................................................................................................................................ 29 Brisbin Road Interchange ................................................................................................................... 31 Interstate 80 .......................................................................................................................................... 33 Illiana Expressway ............................................................................................................................... 35 Prairie Parkway..................................................................................................................................... 41 Rail Priorities ............................................................................................................................................. 45 Rail Dominance in Illinois .................................................................................................................... 47 Waterway Priorities .................................................................................................................................. 55 Illinois River ........................................................................................................................................... 56 Air Priorities ............................................................................................................................................... 60 Morris Municipal Airport ....................................................................................................................... 61 Appendix: Full Sized Maps .................................................................................................................... 62 2013 Grundy County Transportation Priorities 2 Grundy County Transportation Priorities Case Statement Over the course of the last two decades, Grundy County has experienced significant growth in both its economy and population. As these changes have come to the area, existing transportation infrastructure has been extensively challenged. In the interest of maintaining an environment that is supportive of attraction and retention of key industries, and ensuring a high quality of life for both the residents and those who work and travel in Grundy County, the time has come to generate a comprehensive and strategic set of transportation priorities for the County. Priorities Plan Goals: 1. Demonstrate to elected officials and policy makers the need for a high level of state and federal priority for Grundy County transportation planning and projects; 2. Serve as a repository for transportation priorities in Grundy County; 3. Create transparent priorities and goals that are easily visible to the residents of Grundy County and the region in the interest of encouraging input and collaboration; 4. Raise awareness of existing and planned projects among municipal and county leaders to promote collaborative efforts across local governmental agencies; 5. Actively seek to include all external projects affecting Grundy County, including those at the state, federal, and local levels; and 6. Develop a mechanism for prioritizing the management and development of current and future transportation projects affecting Grundy County. Growing Public Transportation Need: The tri-county region was the fastest growing area in the state during the last 10 years, ranking 1-2-3 in percentage population growth (Kendall-110%; Will-35%; Grundy-33%) 2013 Grundy County Transportation Priorities 3 Between 2000 and 2010, the same region added 248,000 residents, and the regional population density increased from 376 persons per square mile in 2000 to 534 in 2010 Total employment for the region increased 36% over the same period, rising from 229,000 to 311,000 jobs, increasing the commuter demand on local roads In the period from 2001 to 2011, the Grundy-Kendall-Will region experienced a 75% increase in transportation and warehousing jobs, from 9,791 in 2001 to 17,108 in 2011 Growing Industry Transportation Need: Transportation, Logistics and Warehousing continues to be a prime industrial growth engine for both Grundy County and the region. The regional 75% increase in jobs in this industry over the last decade has created increased pressure on current transportation systems. The attractiveness of the area for this industry indicates that continuing high levels of growth should be anticipated in the medium term. Future growth is expected to increase in this industry within the county, creating additional road and rail transport needs. Existing multimodal projects and future growth in neighboring Will County are generating and will continue to generate high roadway usage in eastern Grundy County and corridors surrounding that area. The current and planned intermodal terminals within Will County will drive significant vehicle presence on our roadways. Increasing rail volumes in the Chicago region provide opportunity for growth in Grundy County, and a need to capitalize on existing and proposed rail projects. 2013 Grundy County Transportation Priorities 4 Grundy County Transportation Priorities Summary of Projects State Road Projects 1. Illinois Route 47 expansion north of I-80 to Caton Farm Road 2. Illinois Route 113 capacity expansion and rail separation at BNSF railroad 3. U.S. Route 6 capacity expansion from Route 47 to Saratoga Road 4. Study impact of new Brisbin Road/I-80 interchange on U.S. Route 6 5. Illiana Expressway route planning and construction 6. Illinois Route 47 widening feasibility study from Southmor Road to I-55 7. Interstate 55 widening to six lanes Gardner to Will County line 8. Interstate 80 capacity expansion west of Ridge Road to Illinois Route 47 9. Interstate 80 Ridge Road to Route 30 Project 10. Prairie Parkway Local Road Projects 11. Ridge Road widening Minooka Road to McEvilly Road including widening of CN viaduct 12. Ridge Road widening from McEvilly Road to U.S. Route 6 13. Brisbin Road corridor north from I-80 into Kendall County 14. Reed Road development in the Villages of Coal City and Braidwood (I-55 to Broadway Road) 15. Dupont Road reconstruction near the Village of Seneca 16. Broadway Street reconstruction in the Village of Coal City 17. McClindon Road reconstruction in the Village of Minooka Local Aviation Projects 18. Morris Airport runway extension to 5500 feet 19. Installation of navigational aids and PAPI lights 20. Additional of a minimum 4000-foot cross runway Rail Projects 21. Seneca I-80 Railport 22. Providence Logistics 23. Passenger rail extension from Joliet to LaSalle County 24. High-speed rail for Chicago to St. Louis route 2013 Grundy County Transportation Priorities 5 Waterway Projects 25. Modernization of the Illinois River lock system 26. Expanded river port utilization on the Illinois River in the EDPA *List compiled based on interviews with the County of Grundy, City of Morris, Villages of Channahon, Coal City, Diamond, Dwight, Mazon and Minooka. 2013 Grundy County
Recommended publications
  • Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan
    Draft for Discussion Purposes Only Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan Village of New Lenox | January 11, 2013 New Lenox Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan Existing Conditions Synthesis Report Table of Contents Section 00: Introduction i Section 01: Past Plans & Studies 01 Section 02: Community Outreach 03 Section 03: Existing Land Use & Development 16 Section 04: Current Zoning & Regulatory Controls 19 Section 05: Transportation & Mobility 22 Section 06: Character Zones, Streetscape, & Urban Design 25 Section 07: Issues & Opportunities 29 Introduction This Synthesis Report presents the existing physical condi- Predominately a commercial corridor dating back to before tions, identifies the issues and opportunities, and summarizes Regional Setting World War II, Route 30 has long served as a center for retail Corridor Planning Process the first steps of the planning process for the New Lenox U.S. The Village of New Lenox is located approximately 40 miles and office activity. Today, the corridor boasts approximately The planning process for this study entails six different steps. Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan. Since there has al- southwest of downtown Chicago. It is a predominantly resi- 90 businesses. A relatively high automobile traffic volume on This report contains documentation for steps one through ready been a Route 30 Corridor Revitalization Plan developed dential suburban community of approximately 25,000 people, Route 30 helps accommodate and attract a range of com- three. for the Village back in 2006, this interim report is not meant and its municipal boundaries encompass approximately 16 mercial activity. The Study Area is adjacent to the New Lenox Step 1: Project Initiation – the “kick-off ” for the project to be an exhaustive inventory of all the conditions and issues, square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Our Altoona, PA Facility
    Directions to Our Altoona, PA Facility Exit From Interstate 80 Exit 161 Exit 161 158 • Follow Route 220 South Bellefonte (It immediately becomes 4 lanes) Milesburg • Approaching State College merge into the lane for 220 South and 322 West • Continue on as the road turns into 2 lanes over Skytop Mount. • At the bottom of Skytop follow the ramp State College for 220 South Port Matilda • Continue south to Bald Eagle • Turn left onto Interstate 99 I-99 Construction Bald Eagle • Travel 21 miles south to Altoona 21 Miles South to Altoona From Interstate 80 Exit 158 North • Follow ALT Route 220 South to Bald Eagle • Turn left onto Interstate 99 EMS • Travel 21 miles south to Altoona 50th S Note: This is t. a Residential Area From PA Turnpike I-76 and I-70 ve. • Follow Exit 145 to the toll booth A • Leaving the toll booth turn left on to Kissel Business Route 220 ve.. A • Follow Business 220 a short distance to the Railroad Sixth entrance to I-99 (on the left) Sheetz Road Plank • Get into the right lane and follow the ramp Logan Valley for I-99 North Mall • Continue on I-99 for 31 miles to Altoona. 58th S Exit 31 treet s Lane On Interstate 99 in Altoona Good’ Exit 31 • Take Exit 31 (Coming from the north turn right at the end of the ramp - Coming from the south turn left at the end of the ramp) Get into the left lane 31 Miles North to Altoona • At the bottom of the hill turn left onto Good’s Lane • Follow Good’s Lane as it turns right and becomes 58th Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 80 Corridor Memorandum of Understanding (Mou) Between Local and Regional Agencies and the California Department of T
    INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN LOCAL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) FOR INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MOBILITY STRATEGIES IN ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES This MOU is a compilation of the goals, policies, and procedures intended to be followed by the parties working together in a coordinated manner to enhance traffic operations along the Interstate 80 (I-80) corridor in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. This MOU is intended to identify the overall commitment and responsibilities regarding ownership, operations, and maintenance of the various equipments installed as part of the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project. 1 Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................... 3 II. DEFINITION AND EXPLANATION OF TERMS ................................... 5 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE OF MOU ......................... 7 IV. PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES .................................................... 9 V. OPERATIONS STRATEGIES AND PRINCIPLES ............................. 10 VI. EQUIPMENT OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE ................................. 15 VII. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES ........................................ 15 VIII. COSTS & FUNDING ........................................................................... 21 IX. FUTURE MOU MODIFICATIONS ...................................................... 22 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C 2 I. BACKGROUND Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Suspended Where Possible for July 4
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Acting Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: July 1, 2020 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Construction suspended where possible for July 4 Non-emergency closures called off, but motorists should still expect work zones SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation announced today that lanes that have been closed for construction will reopen, where possible, for the Fourth of July holiday to minimize travel disruption. Non-emergency closures will be suspended from 3 p.m. July 2 to 11:59 p.m. July 5. The following lane closures will remain in place during the holiday weekend. Work zone speed limits will remain in effect where posted. Please buckle up, put your phone down and drive sober. District 1 City of Chicago: • The following ramps in the Jane Byrne Interchange work zone will remain closed: • o Inbound Kennedy (Interstate 90/94) Expressway exit to inbound Ida B. Wells Drive. o Outbound Dan Ryan Expressway exit to Taylor Street and Roosevelt Road. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive entrance from Canal Street. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Dan Ryan. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Kennedy. o Inbound Eisenhower Expressway (Interstate -290) to outbound Kennedy; detour with U-turn posted. o Inbound Eisenhower; lane reductions continue. o Inbound Ida B. Wells Drive; lane reductions continue. • Outbound Kennedy exit at Canfield Road; closed. • Westbound Bryn Mawr Avenue between Harlem and Oriole avenues; lane reductions continue. • Westbound Higgins Avenue between Oriole and Canfield avenues; lane reductions continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Illinois Department of Transportation
    STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION For the Year Ended June 30, 2007 STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION For the Year Ended June 30, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Agency Officials 1 Management Assertion Letter 2 Compliance Report Summary 4 Accountant’s Reports Independent Accountants’ Report on State Compliance, on Internal Control Over Compliance, and on Supplementary Information for State Compliance Purposes 7 Schedule of Findings Current Findings - State 11 Prior Findings Not Repeated - State 93 Management Audit Follow-up 94 Financial Statement Report The Department’s financial statement report for the year ended June 30, 2007, which includes the report of the independent auditors, basic financial statements, supplementary information, and the independent auditor’s report on internal control over financial reporting and on compliance and other matters based on an audit of basic financial statements performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards has been issued in a separately bound document. Supplementary Information for State Compliance Purposes Summary 122 Fiscal Schedules and Analysis Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 123 Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 124 Schedule of Appropriations, Expenditures and Lapsed Balances 129 Comparative Schedule of Net Appropriations, Expenditures and Lapsed Balances 135 Schedule of Changes in State Property 140 Comparative Schedule of Cash Receipts and Reconciliation of Cash Receipts to Deposits
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Reso 1..2
    *LRB09621705GRL39304r* SJ0118 LRB096 21705 GRL 39304 r 1 SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 2 WHEREAS, The Chicago - Kansas City Expressway (C-KC) 3 corridor through Illinois and Missouri forms a unified corridor 4 of commerce between 2 of the major commercial and tourism 5 centers in the Midwest; and 6 WHEREAS, The portion of the Chicago - Kansas City 7 Expressway corridor from Chicago to the Quad Cities, Galesburg, 8 Monmouth, Macomb, and Quincy, constitutes a major artery for 9 travel, commerce, and economic opportunity for a significant 10 portion of the State of Illinois; and 11 WHEREAS, It is appropriate that this highway corridor 12 through Illinois connecting to the corridor in the State of 13 Missouri be uniquely signed as the Chicago - Kansas City 14 Expressway (C-KC) to facilitate the movement of traffic; 15 therefore, be it 16 RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE NINETY-SIXTH GENERAL 17 ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 18 CONCURRING HEREIN, that we designate Interstate 88, the 19 portions of Interstate 55 and Interstate 80 from Chicago to the 20 Quad Cities, Interstate 74 to Galesburg, U.S. Route 34 to 21 Monmouth, U.S. Route 67 to Macomb, Illinois 336 to Interstate 22 172 at Quincy, Interstate 172 to Interstate 72, and Interstate -2-SJ0118LRB096 21705 GRL 39304 r 1 72 to the crossing of the Mississippi River at Hannibal, 2 Missouri as the Illinois portion of the Chicago - Kansas City 3 Expressway and marked concurrently with the existing route 4 numbers as Illinois Route 110; and be it further 5 RESOLVED, That the Illinois Department of Transportation 6 is requested to erect at every route marker, consistent with 7 State and federal regulations, signs displaying the approved 8 C-KC logo and Illinois Route 110; and be it further 9 RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be 10 delivered to the Secretary of the Illinois Department of 11 Transportation, the Director of the Missouri Department of 12 Transportation, and the Mayors of Chicago, the Quad-Cities, 13 Galesburg, Monmouth, Macomb, and Quincy..
    [Show full text]
  • 4855 Interstate 55
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM INTERSTATE 55 4855 JACKSON, MS 39206 www.4855Interstate55.com AFFILIATED BUSINESS DISCLOSURE review all such summaries and other documents of whatever nature independently and not rely on the contents of this CBRE, Inc. operates within a global family of companies Memorandum in any manner. with many subsidiaries and/or related entities (each an “Affiliate”) engaging in a broad range of commercial real Neither the Owner or CBRE, Inc, nor any of their respective estate businesses including, but not limited to, brokerage directors, officers, Affiliates or representatives make any services, property and facilities management, valuation, representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the investment fund management and development. At times accuracy or completeness of this Memorandum or any of its 4855 INTERSTATE 55 TABLE OF CONTENTS different Affiliates may represent various clients with contents, and no legal commitment or obligation shall arise competing interests in the same transaction. For example, by reason of your receipt of this Memorandum or use of its this Memorandum may be received by our Affiliates, contents; and you are to rely solely on your investigations and including CBRE Investors, Inc. or Trammell Crow Company. inspections of the Property in evaluating a possible purchase Those, or other, Affiliates may express an interest in the of the real property. property described in this Memorandum (the “Property”) The Owner expressly reserved the right, at its sole discretion, may submit an offer to purchase the Property and may be the to reject any or all expressions of interest or offers to purchase successful bidder for the Property.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interstate Highway System Turns 60
    The Interstate Highway System turns 60: Challenges to Its Ability to Continue to Save Lives, Time and Money JUNE 27, 2016 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP ® of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization that researches, evaluates and distributes economic and technical data on surface transportation issues. TRIP is sponsored by insurance companies, equipment manufacturers, distributors and suppliers; businesses involved in highway and transit engineering and construction; labor unions; and organizations concerned with efficient and safe surface transportation. Executive Summary Sixty years ago the nation embarked on its greatest public works project, the construction of the Interstate Highway System. President Dwight D. Eisenhower provided strong support for the building of an Interstate Highway System that would improve traffic safety, reduce travel times and improve the nation’s economic productivity. Serving as the most critical transportation link in the nation’s economy, the Interstate Highway System has significantly improved the lives of U.S. residents and visitors. Throughout the nation, the Interstate system allows for high levels of mobility by greatly reducing travel times and providing a significantly higher level of traffic safety than other routes. But 60 years after President Eisenhower articulated a vision for the nation’s transportation system, the U. S. again faces a challenge in modernizing its aging and increasingly congested Interstate highway system. If Americans are to continue to enjoy their current level of personal and commercial mobility on Interstate highways and bridges, the nation will need to make a commitment to identifying a long-term funding source to support a well-maintained Interstate Highway System able to meet the nation’s need for additional mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Area Freeway Service Patrol
    BAY AREA FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN July 2021 Updated August 2020 SERVICE START END WEEKEND TOW TRUCKS Annual Total Hours (4 BEAT ID COUNTY ROUTE BEAT LIMITS MILEAGE WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY MID WEEKDAY PM TRUCKS NOTES DATE DATE Sat & Sun REQUIRED** Hours years)* REQUIRED ALA 980 Interstate 580 to Interstate 880 2.03 ALA 24 Interstate 580 to Contra Costa County Line 4.39 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 f 1 CC 24 Contra Costa County Line to Oak Hill Road 6.25 2 1 6120 24480 CC/ALA 13 State Route 24 to Redwood Road(on call) 4.23 d ALA 80 Powell Street to Central Ave. 8.59 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 12:30-19:00 a, c, e, f 2 ALA/CC 580 Interstate 80 to Western Drive/Point Molate (no mid-day,weekend coverage) 6.01 2 1 8015 32060 ALA 880 7th Street to Interstate 238 10.55 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 a, f 4 ALA 238 Interstate 880 to Interstate 580 2.11 2 5360 21440 SM 101 State Route 92 to San Francisco City Limit 14.10 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 2 1 7400 29600 a, f, d 6 SM 92 Highway 101 to Foster City Blvd. (on call) 1.40 8 SCL 101 Bailey Ave to Ellis Street 23.90 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 3 1 8160 32640 f 12 CC 80 Central Ave to Cummings Skyway 8.39 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00 - 15:00 15:00-19:00 2 5360 21440 a, b SCL 880 State Route 237 to Interstate 280 8.42 19 SCL 17 Interstate 280 to State Route 85 4.60 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 2 1 7400 29600 a SCL 237 Interstate 880 to Maude Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Mchenry COUNTY DIVISION of TRANSPORTATION
    McHENRY COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION 2013-2017 Highway Improvement Program Approved June 18, 2013 Construction crews working on Charles J. Miller Road over the Fox River Water Quality Treatment Structure Cleaning................................................... 10 Table of Contents Bridge Program ....................................................................... 11 Armory Road Township Bridge (SN056-3089) (TIP#11-08-0006) ..................... 12 Executive Summary ................................................................... 1 County Line Township Bridge (SN056-3040) (TIP#11-08-0006) ....................... 12 2012 Highlights .................................................................................. 2 Deerpass Road Bridges (SN056-3029/3030) (TIP#11-10-0003) ........................ 12 Flat Iron Road Bridge (SN056-3019) (TIP#11-08-0027) .................................... 12 2013-2017 Program Highlights ............................................................ 2 Franklinville Road Bridge (SN056-3016) (TIP#11-08-0026) .............................. 13 2013-2017 Program Development ...................................................... 2 Franklinville Road Bridge (SN056-3017) (TIP#11-08-0028) .............................. 13 Lawrence Road Bridge (SN056-3012) (TIP#11-08-0032) .................................. 13 Funding Priorities ............................................................................... 2 Noe Road Township Bridge (SN056-3048) (TIP#11-08-0033)........................... 13 Maintenance
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Annual Report
    State of Illinois Illinois Department of Transportation OUR MISSION We provide safe, cost-effective transportation for Illinois in ways that 2008 enhance quality of life, promote economic prosperity, and demonstrate ANNUAL REPORT respect for our environment. CONTENTS OUR GUIDING PRINCIPLES We will accomplish our mission while making the following principles Governor’s Letter . 1 the hallmark of all our work: Safety • Integrity • Responsiveness • Quality • Innovation Secretary’s Letter . 2 OUR VISION Introduction . 3 The Illinois Department of Transportation will be recognized as the Executive Summary . 5 premier state department of transportation in the nation. IDOT Inside . 8 QUALITY POLICY IDOT will consistently provide safe, cost-effective transportation for Aeronautics . 11 Illinois that meets or exceeds the requirements and expectations of our customers. We will actively pursue ever improving quality through Traffic Safety . 14 programs that enable each employee to continually strive to do their job right the first time, every time. Planning & Programming . 20 Finance & Administration . 21 QUALITY STATEMENT Do it right the first time, every time. Chief Counsel . 26 Highways . 28 Business & Workforce Diversity . 37 Governmental Affairs . 39 Public & Intermodal Trans. 41 Quality Compliance & Review . 43 Operations & Communications . 45 Secretary . 47 IDOT Inside . 48 IDOT Outside . 56 Fast Facts . 65 2300 South Dirksen Parkway Springfield, IL 62764 www.dot.il.gov Printed by authority of the State of Illinois printed in-house at a cost of $1.25 each, a quantity of 500. 1079-09, 4/09 © 2009 Illinois Department of Transportation LETTER FROM GOVERNOR 1 LETTER FROM TRANSPORTATION SECRETARY Office of the Secretary 2300 South Dirksen Parkway/Springfield, Illinois/62764 217/782-5597 Fellow Illinoisans, Welcome, and thank you for your interest in this Annual Report for 2008 at the Illinois Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]