DOCSLIB.ORG

Required Text #1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Required Text #1 Wk01 Wednesday, Sep 25 Required Text #1 1 Required Texts, #2 & #3 Summer Reading 2 The Course Title examined: “Intro to Indian Philosophical Literature” “Intro” “Indian” “Philosophical” “Literature” Indian vs. Hindu Sanskrit Sindhu = river or ocean. Persian hindū = inhabitant of Hind, country through which the river Sindhu (Indus) flows = non-Muslims living in the Indus Valley 3 Some Course Housekeeping Get Acquainted Signup Sheet Reading Feedback via Canvas – Short response on assigned readings – For each reading, in brief (1 pg max, total) . What did you like not understand? . What would you like to further discus? – Due by 11:30am of every lecture (MW) – 10 pts, 8 = ~B, pts off missing sections, late Housekeeping, cont’d Weekly Reflection via Canvas – 2-3 sections, each 10 pts, 1.5 pg max – Reflection questions to be kept in mind as one reads – Due by Sat 11am 15% Class Participation grade 4 Housekeeping, cont’d Be sure to check both websites: 1. Class Home Page: http://tiny.cc/Asian225 2. Canvas Course Page Don’t hesitate to ask questions! – [email protected] – In person: GWN 231 . Outside of Office Hrs, M-F 8-9, ThF 11:30-12:30, right after we meet MW 3:30- “Ṛg Veda, Upaniṣad, Gītā” or “Rig Veda, Upanishad, Geeta”? Diacritics – what & why? Sanskrit phonology – 14 vowels – 33 consonants Importance of “sound” Bottom line – Survival Guide 5 Sounds like … Sounds like … a u in but, a in chamaleon j hard, as in just ā father jh lodge-hut ai as in aisle k as kart au as in loud ṃ nasalization of preceding vowel bh club-hut ṅ ~ n c church ṇ ~ n ch birch-hut ñ like Spanish niña ḍ ~ d o as in go ḍh~ mud-hut ṛ as in river esay, longer Spanish e ś shun g hard, as in get, go ṣ ~ shun gh log-hut ṭ ~ t ḥ echo of preceding vowel ṭh~ ant-hill ipinupull ī machine ū rūle Survival Guide to Pronunciation Survival Schedule Monday Wednesday Introduction, Sep Week 1 What is “Indian Philosophy”? 25: The Vedic Context Sep Oct Week 2 Selections from the Ṛg Veda Selections from the Ṛg & Atharva Vedas 30: 2: Selections from the Atharva Veda Week 3 Oct 7: Oct 9: Upaniṣads: Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3 & 4 Intro. to the Upaniṣads Upaniṣads: Taittirīya 2 & 3, Chāndogya Week 4 Oct 14: Oct 16: Upaniṣads: Kena, Kaṭha 6 Week 5 Oct 21: Upaniṣads: Praśna, Muṇḍaka Oct 23: Upaniṣads: Māṇḍūkya, Īśāvāsya Week 6 Oct 28: Diwali: No Class Oct 30: Yogasūtras: Introduction Week 7 Nov 4: Yogasūtras: Chs. 1, 2 Nov 6: Yogasūtras: Chs. 2, 3 Week 8 Nov 11: Veterans Day: No Class Nov 13: Yogasūtras: Chs. 3, 4 Week 9 Nov 18: Yogasūtras: Summation Nov 20: Bhagavad Gītā: Intro. Week 10 Nov 25: Bhagavad Gītā: Chs. 1-6 Nov 27: Bhagavad Gītā: Chs. 7-12 Week 11 Dec 2: Bhagavad Gītā: Chs. 13-18 Dec 4: Presentations Final Paper Due 2:00pm Finals Dec 9: In class:: 2:30-4:20pm, Week SAV 168 6 Origins of Vedic Culture? Sanātana dharma, eternal dharma • Dharma = religion, law, morality, order, justice, ethics, merit, duty … Considered anādī, beginning-less Revealed to ṛṣi-s, “seers” Some historical evidence however… 2600-1600 BCE Indus Valley Civilization 7 Hints of Early Religion? Harappan “Priest” Proto Shiva? Aryan Invasion/Immigration Theory 8 1500-500 BCE. Vedic corpus “composed” – śruti Veda from √vid, to know Maintenance of cosmic order “sacrifice” to Agni, fire god transports offerings to other gods. Brāhmins Date controversy Vedas 4 Vedas: • ṚgVeda – collection of hymns sung during rituals •SāmaVeda – chants sung during Soma ritual • YajurVeda – prose formulas, mantras • AtharvaVeda – collection of charms & spells for every purpose (health, wealth, sorcery) 9 Vedic corpus Brāhmaṇas – “theological textbooks” explaining all aspects of Vedic rituals Āraṇyakas – wilderness texts discussing more secret & ‘dangerous’ rituals Upaniṣads 600 BCE – beg. CE – secret teachings, beginnings of philosophical speculations: where do we come from, why are we here, where do we go after death? 500 BCE - 400 CE: Challenges 450-370 BCE: The Buddha, Siddārtha Gautama Heterodox challenges to Vedic system Weakens Hinduism “6 Schools of Philosophy” develop in response 10 400 BCE-200 CE: Development of the Rāmāyaṇa epic 400 BCE-400 CE: Development of the Mahābhārata epic 11 200 BCE-100 CE: Bhagavad Gītā, Song of the Lord More than the Vedas, this is the text studied by the average Hindu smṛti (as opposed to śruti) confirmation of śruti, Vedic dharma, Upaniṣads Message of Kṛṣṇa, reconciling the conflict between doing one’s duty and following one’s desires At the same time… 200 BCE-400 CE: Dharma-śāstras • texts prescribing authoritative code of ethics for all of society 1-200 CE: Yoga Sūtras of Pātañjali • text on meditation • 8 limbs: yama, niyama, āsana, prāṇāyāma, pratyāhāra, dhāraṇā, dhyāna, samādhi 12 Philosophical Schools 6 orthodox schools, ~200 BCE •Nyāya & Vaiśeṣika – logic, atomism •Sāṃkhya & Yoga – inert matter, spirit and their admixture •Mīmāṃsā & Vedānta – Vedic exegesis, Upaniṣadic thought Today, only Vedānta and Nyāya schools “survive,” rest absorbed Bhakti, devotion & surrender Seeds in MB, Gītā Purāṇas Starts to come to the fore around 7th cent. 13 Beginnings of Vedic Speculation Ṛg Vedic Ritualism Hymns of praise to personifications of nature – fire, rain, wind – sun, moon Complicated rituals Performed by priestly class. Complexity grows to where gods become subsidiary. – Only rich persons can afford these rituals. 14 Atharva Veda – Popular Religion “Lower” ritualism, popular belief Available to the masses “Magic” spells, charms Healing, prosperity, victory No opposition to Ṛg Veda Ideas from “lower” sphere contribute to the “higher” Henotheism, Monotheism, Monism Henotheism = acceptance of many gods, with one deity as the supreme – “mitigated polytheism” – Ritual context Monotheism – tentative glimpses in RV, AV Monism – abstract, ultimate First Principle 15.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shadows of Being
    Shadows of Being Shadows of Being Four Philosophical Essays By Marko Uršič Shadows of Being: Four Philosophical Essays By Marko Uršič This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Marko Uršič All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-1593-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-1593-2 To my dear parents Mila and Stanko who gave me life Just being alive! —miraculous to be in cherry blossom shadows! Kobayashi Issa 斯う活て 居るも不思議ぞ 花の陰 一茶 Kō ikite iru mo fushigi zo hana no kage TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures............................................................................................. ix Acknowledgements .................................................................................... xi Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 Shadows of Ideas 1.1 Metaphysical essence of shadow, Platonism.................................... 2 1.2 The Sun and shadows in Ancient Egypt .......................................... 6 1.3 From Homeric to Orphic shadows ................................................. 15 Chapter Two .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JOSHUA L. MOSS Source: Melilah: Atheism, Scepticism and Challenges to Mono
    EDITOR Daniel R. Langton ASSISTANT EDITOR Simon Mayers Title: Satire, Monotheism and Scepticism Author(s): JOSHUA L. MOSS Source: Melilah: Atheism, Scepticism and Challenges to Monotheism, Vol. 12 (2015), pp. 14-21 Published by: University of Manchester and Gorgias Press URL: http://www.melilahjournal.org/p/2015.html ISBN: 978-1-4632-0622-2 ISSN: 1759-1953 A publication of the Centre for Jewish Studies, University of Manchester, United Kingdom. Co-published by SATIRE, MONOTHEISM AND SCEPTICISM Joshua L. Moss* ABSTRACT: The habits of mind which gave Israel’s ancestors cause to doubt the existence of the pagan deities sometimes lead their descendants to doubt the existence of any personal God, however conceived. Monotheism was and is a powerful form of Scepticism. The Hebrew Bible contains notable satires of Paganism, such as Psalm 115 and Isaiah 44 with their biting mockery of idols. Elijah challenged the worshippers of Ba’al to a demonstration of divine power, using satire. The reader knows that nothing will happen in response to the cries of Baal’s worshippers, and laughs. Yet, the worshippers of Israel’s God must also be aware that their own cries for help often go unanswered. The insight that caused Abraham to smash the idols in his father’s shop also shakes the altar erected by Elijah. Doubt, once unleashed, is not easily contained. Scepticism is a natural part of the Jewish experience. In the middle ages Jews were non-believers and dissenters as far as the dominant religions were concerned. With the advent of modernity, those sceptical habits of mind could be applied to religion generally, including Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Hinduism in Time and Space
    Introduction: Hinduism in Time and Space Preview as a phenomenon of human culture, hinduism occupies a particular place in time and space. To begin our study of this phenomenon, it is essential to situate it temporally and spatially. We begin by considering how the concept of hinduism arose in the modern era as a way to designate a purportedly coherent system of beliefs and practices. since this initial construction has proven inadequate to the realities of the hindu religious terrain, we adopt “the hindu traditions” as a more satisfactory alternative to "hinduism." The phrase “hindu traditions” calls attention to the great diversity of practices and beliefs that can be described as “hindu.” Those traditions are deeply rooted in history and have flourished almost exclusively on the indian subcontinent within a rich cultural and religious matrix. As strange as it may seem, most Hindus do The Temporal Context not think of themselves as practicing a reli- gion called Hinduism. Only within the last Through most of the millennia of its history, two centuries has it even been possible for the religion we know today as Hinduism has them to think in this way. And although that not been called by that name. The word Hin- possibility now exists, many Hindus—if they duism (or Hindooism, as it was first spelled) even think of themselves as Hindus—do not did not exist until the late eighteenth or early regard “Hinduism” as their “religion.” This irony nineteenth century, when it began to appear relates directly to the history of the concept of sporadically in the discourse of the British Hinduism.
    [Show full text]
  • Mdm1012le If God Is Good Why Is There Evil
    Dear Christian Leader, You are receiving this research brief because you have signed up for free leader equipping ministry resources at markdriscoll.org. I want to personally thank you for loving Jesus and serving his people. I also want to thank you for allowing me the honor of helping you lead and feed God’s people. This research brief is a gift from Mark Driscoll Ministries. It was prepared for me a few years ago by a professional research team. I am happy to make it available to you, and I would request that you not post it online. If you know of other Christian leaders who would like to receive it, they can do so by signing up for for free leadership resources at markdriscoll.org. It’s a great joy helping people learn about Jesus from the Bible, so thank you for allowing me to serve you. If you would be willing to support our ministry with an ongoing or one- time gift of any amount, we would be grateful for your partnership. A Nobody Trying to Tell Everybody About Somebody, Pastor Mark Driscoll 1 21001 NORTH TATUM BLVD | STE 1630-527 | PHOENIX, AZ 85050 | [email protected] MARKDRISCOLL.ORG If God is Good Why is There Evil? Research brief prepared by a research team How can evil or suffering be reconciled with the Christian affirmation of the goodness and power of the God who created the world? The problem of evil is three-legged stool: 1) God is all powerful, 2) God is good, and 3) evil really does exist.
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNITY of GOD Introduction Monotheism, As a Word, Was Coined
    CHAPTER SIX THE UNITY OF GOD René Munnik (Tilburg University) Introduction Monotheism, as a word, was coined in early modernity.1 It was meant to indicate religions, theologies or religious philosophies that apprehend God as “the one and only One for all.” The “oneness,” indicated by the prefix monos, had, and has, a triple meaning: it stands for God’s unique- ness—the “one and only, and no other”—, it stands for God’s unity— “One, no dividedness, fickleness or struggles within godself”—, and it stands for God’s universality—“for all, not for some.” Strictly speaking, these meanings do not necessarily imply each other, but orthodox “monotheism” generally holds that God is unique and universal because of God’s unity; whereas the gods being “many,” “particular” and “capricious” within and among themselves. Besides, “monotheism” is a word of controversies, in the sense that it is meant to exclude other ideas about God or the divine. Its natural place is within an arena of contested views, like polytheism, pantheism, deism, henotheism and even poly- demonism; all these words, again, being modern words. Hence, the use and meaning of this word “monotheism” presupposes a modern systematisation or taxonomy of different religious phenom- ena or theological convictions and their mutual antagonisms. It is hard to imagine why a non-Western, non-modern “polytheist” should con- sider himself as such, although he may in fact venerate “many gods.” It is against the background of the conceptual framework of modern 1 Henry More (1614-1687), a prominent member of the Cambridge Platonist School was among the first who used it.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION to THEISM Contents 1.0 Objectives
    UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION TO THEISM Contents 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Types of Theism 1.3 Kinds of Theism 1.4 Let Us Sum Up 1.5 Key Words 1.6 Further Readings and References 1.0 OBJECTIVES Is there a God? God is one or many? Do celestial beings (gods, angels, spirits, and demons) exist? Is there life after death? Is religion a need for modern human? If there is a God then why evil exists? Can man comprehend God? Can the human communicate with God? Does God answer prayers? There are many existential questions raised by humans in the realm of religion, spirituality and metaphysics. Theism is a philosophical ideology which answers the questions arose above in its affirmative. In simple words theism is an ideology that propagates belief in the existence of God or gods. The term ‘theism’ is synonymous to “having belief in God”. In the broadest sense, a theist is a person with the belief that at least one deity (God) exists. This God can be addressed as The Absolute, The Being, Ground of Being, The Ultimate, The World-Soul, the Supreme Good, The Truth, The First Cause, The Supreme Value, The Thing in Itself, The Mystery etc. Theism acknowledges that this god is a living being having personality, will and emotions. Theists believe in a personal God who is the creator and sustainer of life. The answers for the questions ‘Who is god?’ ‘What is god?’ are attempted by the theists. In discussing theism there arises another important question. It is like when was the human mind started to think about God? Many theistic theologians believe that “God consciousness” is innate in the human mind.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of Hindu God Concepts and Arguments Proving the Existence of God Perspective Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
    Vol. 4 No. 2 October 2020 THE RELEVANCE OF HINDU GOD CONCEPTS AND ARGUMENTS PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF GOD PERSPECTIVE GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ By: Krisna S. Yogiswari Sekolah Tinggi Agama Hindu Negeri Mpu Kuturan Singaraja Email: [email protected] Received: June 23, 2020 Accepted: October 12, 2020 Published: October 31, 2020 Abstract Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz is a German philosopher who provides a comprehensive argument about the existence of God. Although Leibniz has made a mistake in thinking about God, the evidence of God’s presence offered by him gives us an example and a strength to deepen our faith: Leibniz’s courage is to increase his confidence and his power to maintain God's existence. The arguments presented by Leibniz are very relevant to the concept of God in Hinduism. It also seems that with evidence of harmony that had already been built before, Leibniz fell into the trap of atheism implicitly because it denied the existence of a personal God and only relied on internal law. Regarding the harmony that had already been built before, Leibniz explained that civil laws were working in monade. Monade are predetermined natures, which result in having one characteristic that governs everything. But the best is that not only for the whole in general but also for individuals, especially individuals who have a love for God. Keyword: Leibniz, Existence, God, Hinduism 175 Vol. 4 No.2 October 2020 I. INTRODUCTION qualitative philosophical research approach, The issue and debate about the with the existence of God as a material existence of God is a line of continuity that object and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz’s flows and leads to the entire history of the perspective as a formal object.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Smith and the Trinity: an Analysis and Defense of the Social Model of the Godhead
    Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 25 Issue 1 Article 3 1-1-2008 Joseph Smith and the Trinity: An Analysis and Defense of the Social Model of the Godhead David Paulsen Brett McDonald Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Paulsen, David and McDonald, Brett (2008) "Joseph Smith and the Trinity: An Analysis and Defense of the Social Model of the Godhead," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 25 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. DOI: 10.5840/faithphil20082513 Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol25/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. JOSEPH SMITH AND THE TRINITY: AN ANALYSIS AND DEFENSE OF THE SOCIAL MODEL OF THE GODHEAD David Paulsen and Brett McDonald The theology of Joseph Smith remains controversial and at times divisive in the broader Christian community. This paper takes Smith’s trinitarian theol- ogy as its point of departure and seeks to accomplish four interrelated goals: (1) to provide a general defense of “social trinitarianism” from some of the major objections raised against it; (2) to express what we take to be Smith’s understanding of the Trinity; (3) to analyze the state of modern ST and (4) to argue that, as a form of ST, Smith’s views contribute to the present discussion amongst proponents of ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of David Penchansky, Twilight of the Gods
    BOOK REVIEWS REVIEW OF DAVID PENCHANSKY, TWILIGHT OF THE GODS Michael Carden Honorary Research Adviser, School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics, University of Qld, Australia. Correspondence to Michael Carden: [email protected] Michael Carden reviews David Penchansky’s Twilight of the Gods: Polytheism in the Hebrew Bible. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox; 2005. In this short volume, Penchansky embarks on a ‘subversive reading’ (91) of the Hebrew scriptures to argue that ‘there exist in the Bible divine forces other than Yahweh’ (51). By doing so he is challenging both the two millennia long reading tradition that assumes the Hebrew scriptures are wholly monotheistic in origin and theme and that this monotheism is fully in accord with the later readers’ monotheisms. He also challenges modern scholarly assumptions of a linear evolution of Israelite paganism/polytheism into radical or exclusive monotheism – Yahweh aloneism. Instead, through a series of readings of biblical texts, Penchansky argues that the reli- gious world encountered here is a variegated one ranging from polytheism and henotheism to varieties of inclusive monotheism and exclusive monotheism of the Yahweh alone variety. Con- sequently, the story of Israelite religion is not one of a smooth progress to one God but more a ‘struggle… an ongoing process, with back and forth movement’ (xii). Penchansky’s readings are grouped into two sections – the Gods of Ancient Israel and the Goddesses of Ancient Israel respectively. The first is the longer of the two with five chapters ad- dressing a number of narratives and biblical polemics. In the first chapter, Penchansky presents the story in 2 Kings 3 as one that clearly does not fit a monotheistic worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Monotheism in Paul' S Rhetorical W Orld
    3 Monotheism in Paul' s Rhetorical W orld To investigate the eontribution of the seleeted text, 2 Cor 3:16-4:6, to early discourse about Jesus Christ, we will seek to establish its first-een­ tury theologie al eontext. Sinee the text speaks about God and relates Jesus to God in signifieant ways, we must examine what the author, Paul, a praetieing Jew of the first eentury, believed and assumed about God. From his writings, it is apparent that he shared and appealed to the fun­ damental Jewish tenet of monotheism. Beeause this eoneept has founda­ tional signifieanee for our study, we will doeument and diseuss it in some detail, first looking at the broader first-eentury religious eontext and then examining Seeond Temple Judaism. Pagan Monotheism Most people in the Mediterranean world of the first eentury C.E. were polytheists. On a philosophieallevel some thought in terms of the unity of the divine nature, but on a praetieal level they aeknowledged the worship of many gods in the world. Some dedieated themselves to the worship of one god, but in these eases it would generally be more aeeu­ rate to deseribe them as henotheists rather than monotheists. Versnel deseribed two pagan deities for whom claims of eosmie lord­ ship and universal worship were made, Isis and Dionysos, noting that they were new types of gods and not typieal of the aneient Greek gods. 1 The Bacchae, a play by Euripides produeed in Athens in 405 B.C.E., pre­ sents Dionysos as a foreign god who demanded reverenee by everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secular Problem of Evil: an Essay in Analytic Existentialism
    The secular problem of evil: an essay in analytic existentialism PAUL PRESCOTT Department of Philosophy, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, 13244, USA e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The existence of evil is often held to pose philosophical problems only for theists. I argue that the existence of evil gives rise to a philosophical problem which confronts theist and atheist alike. The problem is constituted by the following claims: (1) Successful human beings (i.e., those meeting their basic prudential interests) are committed to a good-enough world; (2) the actual world is not a good-enough world (i.e., sufficient evil exists). It follows that human beings must either (3a) maintain a state of epistemic ignorance regarding the nature of the actual world or (3b) abandon their basic prudential interests. Theists resolve this problem by rejecting (2), only to confront the problem of evil as it is traditionally understood. Successful atheists also reject (2), but without adequate grounds for doing so. Something might be true while being harmful and dangerous in the highest degree. Indeed, it might be a basic characteristic of existence that those who would know it completely would perish. NIETZSCHE In the Anglo-American philosophical tradition, the problem of evil is the problem of reconciling the existence of evil with the purported existence of God. On some versions of the problem, the existence of evil is held to be logically incompatible with the existence of God; on others, it is held to be evidence against the existence of God. On all versions, the philosophical problem posed by the existence of evil begins and ends with a commitment to theism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Question of Henotheism (A Contribution to the Study of the Problem of the Origin of All Religions)
    Archim. Grigorios D. Papathomas The Question of Henotheism (A contribution to the study of the problem of the origin of all religions) To; lakwnivzein ejsti; filosofein . The existence of henotheism in ancient religion is Brevity is the soul of wit. a historical fact, the detailed study of which contra- (Hellenic proverb). dicts the accepted scientific position on the question of the origin of religion. Furthermore, it puts the problem into a new perspective and casts doubt upon the monism of dilemma: polytheism or monothe- Antiquitas sine veritate ism? (1) What, then, is henotheism? (2) Where can it vetustas erroris est . be found? (3) What does it consist of? The three ARCHIM. GRIGORIOS (St Cyprien, Epistula 74). parts of this study are concerned with the examina- D. PAPATHOMAS tion of these questions. Institute Saint-Serge, Paris JSRI No. 2 /Summer 2002 198 *** day, and has been disregarded for the last century. Only general discussion concerning this subject char- 1. Henotheism is a neologism, yet it may be de- acterize the critical works devoted to it. L. Philippidis fined and described as a form of religion which was agrees with him about the form of henotheism, but ignored until a century ago. For the majority of scien- says only that it was a transitional stage. tists, henotheism is identified with polytheism. How- ever, it is different from polytheism, though in fact it *** is sometimes difficult to distinguish between them. Henotheism was a form of worship of a Supreme 2. In the history of religion, events show a pro- God, unique among and above a number of other gressive emergence of elementa numina.
    [Show full text]