DOCSLIB.ORG

Fernkloof Nature Reserve 2020 – 2025

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fernkloof Nature Reserve 2020 – 2025 FERNKLOOF NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT MAY 2020 FERNKLOOF NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 – 2025 Hermanus, Western Cape, South Africa Final Draft May 2020 www.fernkloof.org.za FERNKLOOF NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT MAY 2020 FERNKLOOF NATURE RESERVE VISION STATEMENT “The FNR is a showcase of the unique indigenous biodiversity of the Kleinriviersberg and the associated coastal lowlands for present and future generations.’’ Image: Leucospermum species ©Hermanus Botanical Society MISSION STATEMENT “’To sustainably manage and protect the natural assets and cultural heritage resources of the Fernkloof Nature Reserve, in partnership with relevant community organisations in order to conserve and ensure the continued existence of its rich biodiversity, and its associated ecological processes and services”. MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES To implement an effective management framework through legislative compliance, corporative governance and the implementation of measurable strategies, policies and procedures; To ensure the conservation of ecological processes, ecosystems and species within the FNR are improved and maintained; To effectively conserve the cultural heritage of the FNR; To maintain and develop meaningful co-management and partnership agreements that benefits the FNR; To ensure any development that is required is undertaken in a sustainable manner ii FERNKLOOF NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT MAY 2020 Authorisation Page Main Contributors The Protected Area Management Plan (PAMP) for the Fernkloof Nature Reserve (FNR) was adapted from the 2014/2017 Fernkloof Nature Reserve Integrated Management Plan compiled by Mr Charl Cilliers and Mr Aubrey Withers of Withers Environmental Consultants (Pty) Ltd., in association with Messrs Urban Dynamics Western Cape. The revised PAMP was compiled by Ms Liezl De Villiers and Ms Tamzyn Zweig (Overstrand Municipality, Environmental Management Services) with contributions from, but not limited to, the following parties: Ms P. Aplon (Overstrand Municipality) Mr D. Beattie (Cliff Path Management Group) Mr N. Green (Overstrand Municipality) Mr T. Dry (Overstrand Municipality) Mr A. Marais (CapeNature) Mr D. Heard (Chairperson: FNR Advisory Board) Ms L. Burman (Hermanus Botanical Society) Dr. D. Marais (Chairperson: Hermanus Botanical Society) Recommended By: Designation Name Signature Date Chairperson of the Advisory Board: Mr Duncan Heard 14 May 2020 Fernkloof Nature Reserve Senior Environmental Manager: Ms Liezl de Villiers 14 May 2020 Overstrand Municipality Director - Infrastructure and Planning: Mr Stephen Muller 14 May 2020 Overstrand Municipality Deputy Mayor: Overstrand Municipality Executive Mayor: Overstrand Municipality Chief Executive Officer: Western Cape Nature Conservation Board Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Approved By: Designation Name Signature Date Minister: Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Western Cape Provincial Government iii FERNKLOOF NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT MAY 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Definitions …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....................1 Abbreviations & Acronyms .................................................................................................................................. 9 The following abbreviations and acronyms are referred to in this document: .................................................. 9 1. The Declaration Status of the FNR ................................................................................................................. 12 2. The Management Framework of the FNR ..................................................................................................... 14 2.1. The Overstrand Municipality ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.2. The Fernkloof Advisory Board (FAB) ........................................................................................................... 14 2.3. CapeNature ................................................................................................................................................. 15 2.4. The South African Institute for Biodiversity (SANBI) .................................................................................. 15 2.5. The Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries: Biodiversity and Conservation ....................... 15 2.7. Co-Management Agreements .................................................................................................................... 16 3. Legislation Guiding the Administration of the FNR ....................................................................................... 18 4. The FNR Protected Area Management Plan (PAMP)..................................................................................... 19 4.1. Legislation guiding the FNR PAMP ........................................................................................................ 19 4.2. The Primary Functions of the FNR PAMP ............................................................................................. 19 4.3. Procedures for the approval of the FNR PAMP ..................................................................................... 20 4.4. The PAMP Stakeholder Participation Process ....................................................................................... 20 4.5. Monitoring and Review of the FNR PAMP ............................................................................................. 20 4.5.1. Review and Amendment Procedures for the FNR PAMP ................................................................... 21 5. Strategic Management Framework of the FNR ............................................................................................. 22 5.1. The Purpose of the FNR ........................................................................................................................ 22 5.2. The Vision of the FNR ........................................................................................................................... 23 5.3. Mission Statement of FNR ..................................................................................................................... 23 5.4. Sustainable Development within the FNR .............................................................................................. 24 5.5. The Values of the FNR .......................................................................................................................... 24 5.6. The Objectives of the Management of the FNR ..................................................................................... 25 6. The Description and Context of the FNR ....................................................................................................... 26 6.1. Location and Extent of the FNR ............................................................................................................. 26 6.2. Conservation History of the FNR ........................................................................................................... 27 6.3. FNR Context: Ecological........................................................................................................................ 28 6.4. FNR Context: Climate ............................................................................................................................ 29 6.5. FNR Context: Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................... 29 6.6. FNR Context: Hydrology ........................................................................................................................ 30 6.6.1. Groundwater ....................................................................................................................................... 31 6.6.2. River and Catchment Areas ................................................................................................................ 32 6.6.3. Coastal and Estuary Zones ................................................................................................................ 32 6.7. FNR Context: Vegetation ....................................................................................................................... 32 6.7.1. Overberg Sandstone Fynbos .............................................................................................................. 34 6.7.2. Western Coastal Shale Band Vegetation ............................................................................................ 36 iv FERNKLOOF NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT MAY 2020 6.3. Hangklip Sand Fynbos ........................................................................................................................... 37 6.7.4. Agulhas Limestone Fynbos ................................................................................................................. 38 6.7.5. Cape Lowlands Freshwater Wetlands ................................................................................................. 38 6.7.6. Southern Cape Afrotemperate Forest ................................................................................................. 39 6.7.7. Overberg Dune Strandveld (and Western Cape Milkwood Forest) ...................................................... 40
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • News from the CREW
    Volume 6 • March 200 News from the CREW lthough 2009 has been a Asteraceae family) in full flower. REW, the Custodians of Areally challenging year with These plants are usually rather C Rare and Endangered the global recession having had inconspicuous and are very hard Wildflowers, is a programme a heavy impact on all of us, it to spot when not flowering, so that involves volunteers from we were very lucky to catch it could not break the strong spir- the public in the monitoring it of CREW. Amidst the great in flower. The CREW team has taken a special interest in the and conservation of South challenges we came up tops genus Marasmodes (we even Africa’s threatened plants. once again, with some excep- have a day in April dedicated to CREW aims to capacitate a tionally great discoveries. the monitoring of this genus) network of volunteers from as they all occur in the lowlands a range of socio-economic Our first great adventure for and are severely threatened. I backgrounds to monitor the year took place in the knew from the herbarium speci- and conserve South Afri- Villiersdorp area. We had to mens that there have not been ca’s threatened plant spe- collect flowering material of any collections of Marasmodes Prismatocarpus lycioides, a data cies. The programme links from the Villiersdorp area and volunteers with their local deficient species in the Campan- was therefore very excited conservation agencies and ulaceae family. We rediscovered about this discovery. As usual, this species in the area in 2008 my first reaction was: ‘It’s a particularly with local land and all we had to go on was a new species!’ but I soon so- stewardship initiatives to en- scrappy nonflowering branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofaunal Survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the Foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
    Herpetology Notes, volume 13: 717-730 (2020) (published online on 25 August 2020) Herpetofaunal survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa Werner Conradie1,2,* Brian Reeves3, Sandile Mdoko3, Lwandiso Pamla3, and Oyama Gxabhu3 Abstract. The results of a herpetofaunal survey of Ongeluksnek Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa are presented here. Combination of visual encounter survey methods and standard Y-shape trap arrays were used to conduct the survey. A total of 26 species (eight amphibians and 18 reptiles) were recorded, representing 29 quarter-degree grid cell records, of which 62% represented the first records for these units. Furthermore, we document the presence of three species of snakes (Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia, Hemachatus haemachatus and Homoroselaps lacteus) for the first time for the whole degree square of 3028 (approx. 100 km2). This study highlights the need to survey poorly known regions to enable us to understand and document the full distributional extent of species. We also discuss the impact of uncontrolled fires on the absence of grassland specialised species during our survey. Keywords. Amphibia, Reptilia, karroid, conservation, biodiversity, fire Introduction has been done in the southern and western regions (e.g. Branch and Braack, 1987), while the northern and The herpetofaunal richness of South Africa is central areas associated with the former homelands of considered to be amongst the highest in the world the Ciskei and Transkei remained poorly surveyed. In (Branch, 1998; Bates et al., 2014; Du Preez and recent years a series of rapid biodiversity studies has Carruthers, 2017; Tolley et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Celastraceae), a New Species from Southern Africa
    Phytotaxa 208 (3): 217–224 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.208.3.4 Putterlickia neglecta (Celastraceae), a new species from southern Africa MARIE JORDAAN1,3, RICHARD G.C. BOON2 & ABRAHAM E. VAN WYK1* 1H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002 South Africa. 2Environmental Planning and Climate Protection Department, eThekwini Municipality, Durban, 4000 South Africa. 3Previous address: South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa. *Author for correspondence. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Putterlickia neglecta, a new species here described and illustrated, is known from South Africa (Mpumalanga and north- eastern KwaZulu-Natal), Swaziland and southern Mozambique. It is considered a near-endemic to the Maputaland Centre of Endemism. Plants grow as a shrub or small tree in savanna and thicket, or in the understory of inland, coastal and dune forests. Vegetatively it superficially resembles P. verrucosa, the species with which it has hitherto most often been confused. Both species have stems with prominently raised lenticels, but P. neglecta differs from P. verrucosa in having sessile to subsessile leaves with mostly entire, revolute leaf margins, flowers borne on pedicels 8–15 mm long, with petals up to 6 mm long and spreading or slightly recurved. Putterlickia verrucosa has leaves with distinct petioles, spinulose-denticulate mar- gins, much smaller flowers borne on pedicels up to 4 mm long, with petals up to 2 mm long and erect or slightly spreading.
    [Show full text]
  • Driftsands Nature Reserve Complex PAMP
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Driftsands Nature Reserve is situated on the Cape Flats, approximately 25 km east of Cape Town on the National Route 2, in the Western Cape Province. The reserve is situated adjacent to the Medical Research Centre in Delft and is bounded by highways and human settlement on all sides. Driftsands is bound in the northwest by the R300 and the National Route 2 and Old Faure road in the south. The northern boundary is bordered by private landowners, while the eastern boundary is formed by Mfuleni Township. The Nature Reserve falls within the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality. The reserve experiences a Mediterranean-type climate with warm dry summers, and cool wet winter seasons. Gale force winds from the south east prevail during the summer months, while during the winter months, north westerly winds bring rain. Driftsands Nature Reserve represents of one of the largest remaining remnants of intact Cape Flats Dune Strandveld which is classified as Endangered, and harbours at least two Endangered Cape Flats endemics, Muraltia mitior and Passerina paludosa. The Kuils River with associated floodplain wetlands, dune strandveld depressions and seeps are representative of a wetland type that has been subjected to high cumulative loss, and provides regulatory ecosystem services such as flood attenuation, ground water recharge/discharge and water quality improvement. The site provides access for cultural and/or religious practices and provides opportunities for quality curriculum based environmental education. Driftsands Nature Reserve is given the highest priority rating within the Biodiversity Network (BioNet), the fine scale conservation plan for the City of Cape Town.
    [Show full text]
  • R Conradie Orcid.Org 0000-0002-8653-4702
    Influence of the invasive fish, Gambusia affinis, on amphibians in the Western Cape R Conradie orcid.org 0000-0002-8653-4702 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Zoology at the North-West University Supervisor: Prof LH du Preez Co-supervisor: Prof AE Channing Graduation May 2018 23927399 “The whole land is made desolate, but no man lays it to heart.” JEREMIAH 12:11 i DECLARATION I, Roxanne Conradie, declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work, except where otherwise acknowledged. It is being submitted for the degree of M.Sc. to the North-West University, Potchefstroom. It has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. ____________________ (Roxanne Conradie) ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to the following persons and organisations, without whose assistance this study would not have been possible: My supervisor Prof. Louis du Preez and co-supervisor Prof. Alan Channing, for guidance, advice, support, and encouragement throughout the duration of this study. Prof Louis, your passion for the biological sciences has been an inspiration to me since undergraduate Zoology classes five years ago. Prof Alan, you were a vital pillar of support for me in the Cape and I am incredibly grateful towards you. Thank you both for all the time and effort you have put into helping me with my work, for all your honest and detailed advice, as well as practical help. It is truly a privilege to have had such outstanding biologists as my mentors. My husband Louis Conradie, for offering up so many weekends in order to help me with fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fine-Scale Conservation Plan for Cape Lowlands Renosterveld: Technical Report
    A Fine-Scale Conservation Plan for Cape Lowlands Renosterveld: Technical Report MAIN REPORT September 2003 Amrei von Hase Mathieu Rouget Kristal Maze Nick Helme Report No. CCU 2/03 Cape Conservation Unit Botanical Society of South Africa Pvt Bag X 10 7735 Claremont www.botanicalsociety.org.za/ccu Key Partners and Sponsors of the Cape Lowlands Renosterveld Project TABLE MOUNTAIN FUND 2 Acknowledgements Many individuals and organizations have contributed generously to the Cape Lowlands Renosterveld Project to whom the Botanical Society and the project team are greatly indebted. We express our appreciation to you in this section and in addition have provided acknowledgement to others in sections of this report where their contribution was relevant. We are particularly indebted to our key project partners, the Western Cape Nature Conservation Board (WCNCB), for putting their full support behind the project from its inception as well as their many contributions to the project. In Scientific Services we especially thank the late Chris Burgers, Helen de Klerk, Ernst Baard, Annelise le Roux, Guy Palmer and Andrew Turner for their guidance in the project planning and initiation stages, particularly on data and GIS matters. We are tremendously grateful to Chris who generously and infectiously shared with us his wealth of knowledge about the lowlands. In Operations we express our appreciation to the business unit managers, extension officers and regional ecologists who played a vital role particularly in shaping the final products of the project. We are especially grateful to Anton Wolfaardt and Chris Martens. Wendy Paisley of the Cape Conservation Unit (CCU) of the Botanical Society provided invaluable administrative and organizational support to the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Banded Mongoose
    Mungos mungo – Banded Mongoose Assessment Rationale The Banded Mongoose is listed as Least Concern as, although its distribution is restricted to the northeast of the assessment region, it is generally common in suitable habitat and is present in several protected areas. There are no major threats that could cause range-wide population decline. Accidental persecution through poisoning, controlled burning, and infectious disease may lead to local declines, whilst wildlife ranching might have a positive effect by conserving more suitable habitat and connecting subpopulations. Regional population effects: Dispersal across regional Chris & Mathilde Stuart borders is suspected as the range extends widely into Mozambique and is continuous into southeastern Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Botswana and southern Zimbabwe, and the species is not constrained by fences. National Red List status (2004) Least Concern Reasons for change No change Distribution Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern This species is distributed widely in sub-Saharan Africa TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None from Senegal and Gambia to Ethiopia, Eritrea and Somalia, and south to about 31° in South Africa. It has CITES listing None been recorded to 1,600 m asl. in Ethiopia (Yalden et al. Endemic No 1996). Although fairly widespread in southern Africa, M. mungo appears to be rare in West Africa. Its relative In addition to living in groups numbering tens of scarcity in West Africa may be due to niche overlap with its individuals, Banded Mongooses are plural congener, the Gambian Mongoose (M. gambianus), breeders, females giving birth synchronously, and endemic to West Africa and reported to occupy similar provide cooperative care to the communal litter of habitat and have a similar diet (Cant & Gilchrist 2013; van pups (Cant & Gilchrist 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa 2017
    EXPEDITION REPORT Expedition dates: 1 – 27 October 2017 Report published: July 2020 Carnivores of the Cape Floral Kingdom: Surveying Cape leopards, caracals and other species in the fynbos mountains of South Africa EXPEDITION REPORT Carnivores of the Cape Floral Kingdom: Surveying Cape leopards, caracals and other species in the fynbos mountains of South Africa Expedition dates: 1 – 27 October 2017 Report published: July 2020 Authors: Alan T. K. Lee Blue Hill Nature Reserve | University of Cape Town | University of KwaZulu-Natal Gillian McGregor Rhodes University Alastair Potts Nelson Mandela University Matthias Hammer (editor) Biosphere Expeditions 1 © Biosphere Expeditions, a not-for-profit conservation organisation registered in Australia, England, France, Germany, Ireland, U , the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and the European Citizen Science Association. Abstract The fynbos biome of South Africa is a biodiversity hotspot renowned for its very high plant species richness, endemic birds and the presence of the Cape mountain leopard, a small race of African leopard Panthera pardus ssp pardus. Biodiversity monitoring across a range of faunal and floral taxa was conducted in mountain fynbos habitat. Studies were conducted for two weeks in October 2017, with the help of international citizen scientists recruited by Biosphere Expeditions and based at Blue Hill Nature Reserve (Western Cape). In this report we provide a status update on the leopards of Blue Hill Nature Reserve for the period 2016-2020 through photo records. Camera-trapping confirmed the presence of male leopard ‘Strider’, resident since 2015 until early 2019. It also captured a female, suspected of being accompanied by a nearly fully-grown cub.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting the Occurrence and Abundance of the Natal Cascade Frog
    Factors affecting the occurrence and abundance of the Natal Cascade frog, Hadromophryne natalensis, at Mariepskop, South Africa by KATRINA HEATHER DU TOIT Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGY FACULTY OF NATURAL AND AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA PRETORIA SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR WILLEM FERGUSON JUNE 2016 i © University of Pretoria Factors affecting the abundance and occurrence of the Natal cascade frog, Hadromophryne natalensis along streams at Mariepskop, Limpopo Student: Katrina Heather du Toit Supervisor: Professor Willem Ferguson Centre for Environmental Studies University of Pretoria Pretoria, 0002 Email: [email protected] Submitted for the degree Master of Science (Environmental Ecology) in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science ii © University of Pretoria SUMMARY Amphibians have long been recognized as excellent indicators of both biological and ecological health of ecosystems, as they occupy many habitats and environments and have a diverse range of impacts on their immediate environments. It is thus important to investigate the critical habitat requirements, as well as the preferred environmental variables that are associated with different amphibian species in order to provide insight into conservation and management plans, and to predict what effects climate change and disease might have on amphibian populations. The aim of this study was to investigate the abundance and occurrence of the Natal cascade frog, Hadromophryne natalensis on Mariepskop Mountain in Limpopo, South Africa. In this regard, we investigated what environmental factors had an effect on the occurrence and temporal variation of H. natalensis (i.e. pH, water temperature, stream substrate) and, determined when the optimal breeding period of H.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Ecology in Southwestern Zimbabwe, with Emphasis on the Impact of Holistic Planned Grazing Practices Sicelo Sebata Thesis
    Spider ecology in southwestern Zimbabwe, with emphasis on the impact of holistic planned grazing practices Sicelo Sebata Thesis submitted in satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Philosophiae Doctor in the Department of Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State January 2020 Supervisors Prof. Charles R. Haddad (PhD): Associate Professor: Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa. Prof. Stefan H. Foord (PhD): Professor: Department of Zoology, School of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa. Dr. Moira J FitzPatrick (PhD): Regional Director: Natural History Museums of Zimbabwe, cnr Park Road and Leopold Takawira Avenue, Centenary Park Suburbs, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. i STUDENT DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby assert that the work included in this thesis is my own original work and that I have not beforehand in its totality or in part submitted it at any university for a degree. I also relinquish copyright of the thesis in favour of the University of the Free State. S. Sebata 31 January 2020 ii SUPERVISOR DECLARATION iii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to all the spiders that lost their lives in the name of Science. iv ABSTRACT The current information on Zimbabwean spiders is fairly poor and is mostly restricted to taxonomic descriptions, while their ecology remains largely unknown. While taxonomic studies are very important, as many species are becoming extinct before they are described, a focus on the ecology of spiders is also essential, as it helps with addressing vital questions such as the effect of anthropogenic activities on spider fauna.
    [Show full text]