DOCSLIB.ORG

Spatial Dev Plan Southern Dist Technical

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spatial Dev Plan Southern Dist Technical Technical draft 1: SDP / EMF Southern District (H) - for comment and discussion only August 2009 1 Technical draft 1: SDP / EMF Southern District (H) - for comment and discussion only August 2009 2 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 LEGAL STATUS AND VALIDITY .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 KEY COMPONENTS OF THE DISTRICT SDP AND EMF ............................................................................................ 2 1.4 PROCESS ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 STUDY AREA ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. DIRECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 NATIONAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING INFORMANTS ............................................................................................ 5 2.2 METROPOLITAN AND DISTRICT PLANNING INFORMANTS ...................................................................................... 5 2.3 LOCAL AREA PLANS ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2.4 PLANNING POLICY RATIONALISATION .................................................................................................................. 9 3. THE STATE OF THE DISTRICT ............................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES ...................................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Natural environment and resource base ................................................................................................... 10 3.1.3 Settlement patterns .................................................................................................................................... 30 3.2 SYNTHESIS OF KEY ISSUES ................................................................................................................................... 40 3.2.1 Inconsistent attention to preserving and enhancing the natural and cultural environments .................... 40 3.2.2 Residential predominance within isolated urban enclaves, linked to carrying capacity constraints. ....... 40 3.2.3 Existing infrastructural capacity on Main Road corridor ........................................................................ 41 3.2.4 Poor east-west accessibility ...................................................................................................................... 41 3.2.5 Few opportunities for social inclusion ...................................................................................................... 42 3.3 STRATEGIC SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES .......................................................................................... 44 4. VISION, OBJECTIVES AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK .......................................................................... 46 4.1 DRAFT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT VISION .............................................................................................................. 46 4.2 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................................ 47 4.2.1 Spatial strategy 1: Enhance the value of the natural and rural environment and green spaces .............. 47 4.2.2 Spatial strategy 2: Establish an integrated grid based movement system ............................................... 48 4.2.3 Spatial strategy 3: Consolidate and intensify development in the accessibility grid ................................ 49 4.2.4 Spatial strategy 4: Direct urban growth and promote compact, integrated development ....................... 51 4.2.5 Spatial strategy 5: Develop more great people places ............................................................................ 52 4.2.6 Consolidated SDP Conceptual Framework .............................................................................................. 53 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK ............................................................................ 55 5.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................... 55 5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRIORITIES ...................................................................................................... 56 5.2.2 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................................................... 57 5.2.3 Rivers, Wetlands and Groundwater .......................................................................................................... 58 5.2.4 Coastal Areas ............................................................................................................................................ 60 5.2.5 Heritage and Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................. 61 5.2.6 Economic Resources ................................................................................................................................. 62 5.2.7 Settlement Areas and Growth Pressures ................................................................................................... 63 5.2.8 Pollution and Waste Management ............................................................................................................ 65 6. INTEGRATED SDP AND EMF .......................................................................................................................... 67 6.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 67 6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT ZONES AND LAND USE DEVELOPMENT INFORMANTS .............................. 67 6.2.1 ZONE 1: Hydrological Zone .................................................................................................................... 70 6.2.2 ZONE 2: Coastal and Dune Zone ............................................................................................................ 77 6.2.3 ZONE 3: Conservation and Biodiversity Priority Zone ........................................................................... 81 6.2.4 ZONE 4: Cultural and Recreational Resources Zone .............................................................................. 86 6.2.5 ZONE 5: Natural Economic Resources Zone .......................................................................................... 90 6.2.6 ZONE 6: Urban Uses and Utilities Zone ................................................................................................. 95 6.3 NEW DEVELOPMENT AREAS ............................................................................................................................... 98 6.3.1 Hout Bay ................................................................................................................................................... 98 6.3.2 Southern Suburbs ...................................................................................................................................... 99 6.3.3 Far South ................................................................................................................................................ 103 6.3.4 Smaller Development Areas .................................................................................................................... 105 6.4 URBAN RESTRUCTURING AND MAJOR UPGRADING .......................................................................................... 107 Technical draft 1: SDP / EMF Southern District (H) - for comment and discussion only August 2009 i 6.4.1 Open space system .................................................................................................................................. 107 6.4.2 Transport infrastructure ......................................................................................................................... 109 6.4.3 Intensification and major land use change ............................................................................................. 113 6.4.4 Public facilities and public space ........................................................................................................... 116 6.4.5 Housing: Informal Settlement Upgrade ................................................................................................. 117 6.5 COMPOSITE DISTRICT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ....................................................................................... 120 7. IMPLEMENTATION: LOCAL ACTION AREAS .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Property for Sale Hout Bay Cape Town
    Property For Sale Hout Bay Cape Town Leopold nuzzles his skirmishes tub rawly or coquettishly after Abbie grudge and bastes windward, classiest and elated. Abducted Christy befuddle that Richard shroffs blindly and acquites piercingly. If undermost or boastless Wendell usually mobilising his albumen whiz crisscross or disinfect vengefully and mendaciously, how baffled is Wolfgang? Modern home just great food and bay property. Hout Bay resort Property judicial Sale FT Property Listings. Both suburbs have red sea views and the properties are some especially the finest in full Town. Mouhamadou Makhtar Cisse, Minister of inhale and Energy, Senegal. Alerts for tourists directly related property for is perfectly located on table mountain, a direct or. Here was forgotten your password. Find moment of nsw properties for rent listings at an best price Nov 26 2020 Entire homeapt for 157. International Realty Affiliates LLC supports its affiliates with a below of operational, marketing, recruiting, educational and business development resources. Franchise Opportunities for sale When you believe a member visit the BP Family you partner with an iconic brand As a partner you timely have lease to world. Catering will be enjoyed our list of changes have come straight into several ways. We sell up for places and cape town! Cape town is cape town blouberg table bay. Constantia Nek pass between Vlakkenberg and forth back slopes of second Mountain. Find other more lavish the next Cape which City squad. Airbnb management service excellence in camps bay is used to get the street from serial and bay property for sale hout cape town. This exceptional passing traffic builds up.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liesbeek River Valley
    \ UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN FACULTY OF EDUCATION THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF THE LIESBEEK RIVER VALLEY An investigation of the use of an Environmental History approach in ·historical research and in classroom practice A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of M.Ed in History Education \ -...... by JEAN ·BOTIARO MARCH 1996 ' f . , ,:.,- I'.! ' . t. c .-: . The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. This dissertation has two components, one History and one Education, and the central unifying theme is Environmental History. The History component examines the historiography of this sub-discipline, and then applies an environmental analysis as an example of its use in historical research. The second component explores the use of Environmental History in the teaching of school history, and presents a curriculum model which uses this approach. Both components use the Liesbeek River valley in the Cape Peninsula as a case-study. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I need to start off by thanking the person who provided the spark from which this dissertation grew: in June 1994, when I was rather desperately casting about for a research topic which would satisfy both the historical and education components of the course, Howard Phillips of the History Department at UCT mentioned the term "Environmental History".
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Town's Film Permit Guide
    Location Filming In Cape Town a film permit guide THIS CITY WORKS FOR YOU MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR We are exceptionally proud of this, the 1st edition of The Film Permit Guide. This book provides information to filmmakers on film permitting and filming, and also acts as an information source for communities impacted by film activities in Cape Town and the Western Cape and will supply our local and international visitors and filmmakers with vital guidelines on the film industry. Cape Town’s film industry is a perfect reflection of the South African success story. We have matured into a world class, globally competitive film environment. With its rich diversity of landscapes and architecture, sublime weather conditions, world-class crews and production houses, not to mention a very hospitable exchange rate, we give you the best of, well, all worlds. ALDERMAN NOMAINDIA MFEKETO Executive Mayor City of Cape Town MESSAGE FROM ALDERMAN SITONGA The City of Cape Town recognises the valuable contribution of filming to the economic and cultural environment of Cape Town. I am therefore, upbeat about the introduction of this Film Permit Guide and the manner in which it is presented. This guide will be a vitally important communication tool to continue the positive relationship between the film industry, the community and the City of Cape Town. Through this guide, I am looking forward to seeing the strengthening of our thriving relationship with all roleplayers in the industry. ALDERMAN CLIFFORD SITONGA Mayoral Committee Member for Economic, Social Development and Tourism City of Cape Town CONTENTS C. Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Belcom Decisions 27 August 2019 1
    APPROVED DECISIONS OF THE MEETING OF HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE, BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND LANDSCAPE PERMIT COMMITTEE (BELCom) Held on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 in the 1st Floor Boardroom at the Offices of the Department of Cultural Affairs and Sport, Protea Assurance Building, Greenmarket Square, Cape Town scheduled for 09:00 MATTERS DISCUSSED 11 PROVINCIAL HERITAGE SITES: SECTION 27 PERMIT APPLICATIONS 11.1 Proposed Additions and Alterations at Erf 65106, 5 Ascot Road, Kenilworth: MA HM/ CAPE TOWN METROPOLITAN/KENILWORTH/ERF 65106 Case No: 19040407HB0507E DISCUSSION: Amongst other things, the following was discussed: • The Committee and the Applicant discussed the previous meeting’s decision of BELCom on 26 June 2019 and site report, in order to clarify the issues raised. The site report is to be forwarded to the Applicant immediately to assist with clarifying the Committee’s previous minuted response. WD 11.2 Proposed Rezoning from Residential 1 to General Residential in order to Develop a Guest House on Erf 4784, Paarl: MA HM / PAARL / ERF 4784 Case No: 18080107SB0831E RECORD OF DECISION: The Committee resolved to approve the application as a substantial improvement on previous proposals on condition that: 1. A veranda roof is to be added above the proposed first floor walkway. 2. The upstand gable in Section 2 is to be amended to depict a full gable. With the above conditions, heritage resources will no longer be negatively impacted. Revised drawings, including all the elevations are to be submitted to HOMs for approval. SB Approved BELCom Decisions_27 August 2019 1 11.3 Proposed Additions and Alterations, Erf 28173, 2 Dixon Road, Observatory: NM HM/ OBSERVATORY/ ERF 28173 Case No: 19043001HB0522E RECORD OF DECISION: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • NYMPHALIDAE Nationally As Rare (Range Restricted)
    Mecenero et al. / Metamorphosis 31(4): 1–160 134 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/met.v31i4.6 localities for this species. This taxon thus qualifies globally under the IUCN criteria as Least Concern and is classified FAMILY: NYMPHALIDAE nationally as Rare (Range Restricted). Genus Cassionympha Dickson, 1981. Change in status from SABCA: The status has not changed from the previous assessment. Cassionympha camdeboo (Dickson, [1981]) Camdeboo Dull Brown; Kamdeboo Bosbruintjie Threats: No threats at present. Ernest L. Pringle Conservation measures and research required: No conservation actions recommended. Research is required LC into its taxonomy, life history and ecology. Better Rare – Restricted Range appreciation of its distribution and subpopulation sizes is Endemic needed. Cassionympha perissinottoi Pringle, 2013 Southern Rainforest Dull Brown; Kusbruintjie Ernest L. Pringle LC Rare – Restricted Range, Habitat Specialist Endemic Type locality: Eastern Cape province: Aberdeen. Taxonomy: There are no notable issues. Distribution: Endemic to the Eastern Cape province of South Africa, in the Aberdeen district. Habitat: Comparatively moist woodland and scrub at high altitude. Vegetation types: NKl2 Eastern Lower Karoo, NKu2 Upper Type locality: Cape Aghulas, Western Cape. Karoo Hardeveld. Taxonomy: Although there is no lack of clarity about the Assessment rationale: This is a range restricted endemic differences between this taxon and its close congeners, all species found in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa 2 records from the southern Cape for Cassionympha cassius (EOO 30 km ). There are two known subpopulations, which and C. detecta will have to be reexamined, because many are not threatened and are in remote areas. Further could represent this new species.
    [Show full text]
  • Coloured’ Schools in Cape Town, South Africa
    Constructing Ambiguous Identities: Negotiating Race, Respect, and Social Change in ‘Coloured’ Schools in Cape Town, South Africa Daniel Patrick Hammett Ph.D. The University of Edinburgh 2007 1 Declaration This thesis has been composed by myself from the results of my own work, except where otherwise acknowledged. It has not been submitted in any previous application for a degree. i Abstract South African social relations in the second decade of democracy remain framed by race. Spatial and social lived realities, the continued importance of belonging – to feel part of a community, mean that identifying as ‘coloured’ in South Africa continues to be contested, fluid and often ambiguous. This thesis considers the changing social location of ‘coloured’ teachers through the narratives of former and current teachers and students. Education is used as a site through which to explore the wider social impacts of social and spatial engineering during and subsequent to apartheid. Two key themes are examined in the space of education, those of racial identity and of respect. These are brought together in an interwoven narrative to consider whether or not ‘coloured’ teachers in the post-apartheid period are respected and the historical trajectories leading to the contemporary situation. Two main concerns are addressed. The first considers the question of racial identification to constructions of self-identity. Working with post-colonial theory and notions of mimicry and ambivalence, the relationship between teachers and the identifier ‘coloured’ is shown to be problematic and contested. Second, and connected to teachers’ engagement with racialised identities, is the notion of respect. As with claims to identity and racial categorisation, the concept of respect is considered as mutable and dynamic and rendered with contextually subjective meanings that are often contested and ambivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • INTEGRATED HUMAN SETTLEMENTS FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN July 2012 – June 2017 2013/14 REVIEW
    INTEGRATED HUMAN SETTLEMENTS FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN July 2012 – June 2017 2013/14 REVIEW THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN’S VISION & MISSION The vision and mission of the City of Cape Town is threefold: • To be an opportunity city that creates an enabling environment for economic growth and job creation • To deliver quality services to all residents • To serve the citizens of Cape Town as a well-governed and corruption-free administration The City of Cape Town pursues a multi-pronged vision to: • be a prosperous city that creates an enabling and inclusive environment for shared economic growth and development; • achieve effective and equitable service delivery; and • serve the citizens of Cape Town as a well-governed and effectively run administration. In striving to achieve this vision, the City’s mission is to: • contribute actively to the development of its environmental, human and social capital; • offer high-quality services to all who live in, do business in, or visit Cape Town as tourists; and • be known for its efficient, effective and caring government. Spearheading this resolve is a focus on infrastructure investment and maintenance to provide a sustainable drive for economic growth and development, greater economic freedom, and increased opportunities for investment and job creation. To achieve its vision, the City of Cape Town will build on the strategic focus areas it has identified as the cornerstones of a successful and thriving city, and which form the foundation of its Five-year Integrated Development Plan. The vision is built on five key pillars: THE OPPORTUNITY CITY Pillar 1: Ensure that Cape Town continues to grow as an opportunity city THE SAFE CITY Pillar 2: Make Cape Town an increasingly safe city THE CARING CITY Pillar 3: Make Cape Town even more of a caring city THE INCLUSIVE CITY Pillar 4: Ensure that Cape Town is an inclusive city THE WELL-RUN CITY Pillar 5: Make sure Cape Town continues to be a well-run city These five focus areas inform all the City’s plans and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Cape Town July 2006 General Valuation Annexure
    The City of Cape Town July 2006 General Valuation An audit of & comments on the City of Cape Town’s valuation process in terms of the Municipal Property Rates Act 6 of 2004 ____________________________________________________________ Annexure “B” MINUTES of a meeting of the Far South Peninsula Community Forum with councillor Ian Neilson and his subsequent written reply, with the GCTCA’s comments thereon. A. MINUTES OF MEETING of Tuesday 2nd October 2007 in the Fish Hoek Civic Centre council boardroom at 18h00 Present: Cllrs Ian Neilson, Nicki Holderness, Felicity Purchase, Demetri Qually and Simon Liell-Cock (chairperson), Lesley Shackleton, Allen Rose-Innes, Neil Grant, Graham Noble, Doug Tunbridge, Kevin McCarthy, Rory Sales, Steve Perrett and Pat Schultz Apologies: Kommetjie Ratepayers Association Welcome and Introduction: Simon welcomed Cllr Neilson and all present. FSPCF member associations are concerned about the serious problems caused by inaccurate valuations and want to help find a satisfactory way forward. Representatives present were all members of rate payers and other civic organisations in the Far South Peninsula who are members of the FSPCF, which deals with common Far South issues. All FSPCF associations acknowledge the necessity to cross-subsidise poorer areas in the city. This meeting is not to discuss the problems themselves but to identify steps that can be taken to solve them. However, a summary of problems had been prepared by Lesley and Allen as background to this discussion, and a copy had been e-mailed to Cllr Neilson with the request that he respond later in writing to the points raised. Cllr Neilson’s Address: The Cllr said he would like to begin with some general background: Council faced a new set of circumstances with the latest valuation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Statement
    HERITAGE STATEMENT ERF 177552 MILL STREET NEWLANDS CAPE TOWN APPLICATION TO DEMOLISH EXISTING BUILDING SUBMITTED TO HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE IN TERMS OF NATIONAL HERITAGE RESOURCES ACT NO 25 OF 1999 SECTION 34 View of site from Campground Bridge building indicated with red arrow, Google Earth 2015 Prepared for Eris Property Group 10th Floor 80 Strand Street Cape Town 8001 E-mail: [email protected] Tel +27 21 410 1160 Fax +27 21 418 2249 PostNet Suite 122 Private Bag X1005 Claremont 7735 Cape Town South Africa Mobile: 0711090900 Fax: 086 511 0389 E-Mail: [email protected] HERITAGE STATEMENT ERF 177552 MILL STREET NEWLANDS CAPE TOWN FINAL 17 JULY 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.2 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 3 1.3 THE SITE 3 1.4 REPORT SCOPE OF WORK 3 1.5 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS 3 1.5.1 ASSUMPTIONS 3 1.5.2 LIMITATIONS 3 1.6 SPECIALIST TEAM AND DETAILS 3 1.7 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 3 1.8 REPORT STRUCTURE 4 SECTION 2 STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 5 2.1 INTRODUCTION 5 2.2 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTEXT AND STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 5 2.2.1 INTRODUCTION 5 2.2.2 NATIONAL HERITAGE RESOURCES ACT NO. 25 OF 1999 (NHR ACT) 5 2.2.3 MUNICIPAL POLICY AND PLANNING CONTEXT 6 SECTION 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND CONTEXT 9 3.1 NEWLANDS DEVELOPMENT 9 3.2 CONTEXTUAL ASSESSMENT OF SITE 11 3.3 DEVELOPMENT OF SITE 12 3.4 CONTEXT 16 3.5 SITE 18 SECTION 4 SITE & CONTEXT IDENTIFIED HERITAGE RESOURCES & STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCES 20 4.1 INTRODUCTION 20 4.2 SITE AND CONTEXT: PROVISIONAL STATEMENT OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE 20 SECTION 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22 5.1 CONCLUSION 22 5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 22 5.3 SOURCES 22 BRIDGET O’DONOGHUE ARCHITECT, HERITAGE SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENT 2 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION Tommy Brummer Town Planners on behalf of their client, Eris Property Group appointed Bridget O’Donoghue Architect, Heritage Specialist, Environment for a Heritage Statement for the proposed demolition of the existing building situated on Erf 177552 Newlands Cape Town.
    [Show full text]
  • Load-Shedding Area 7
    MOUILLE POINT GREEN POINT H N ELEN SUZMA H EL EN IN A SU M Z M A H N C THREE ANCHOR BAY E S A N E E I C B R TIO H A N S E M O L E M N E S SEA POINT R U S Z FORESHORE E M N T A N EL SO N PAARDEN EILAND M PA A A B N R N R D D S T I E E U H E LA N D R B H AN F C EE EIL A K ER T BO-KAAP R T D EN G ZO R G N G A KLERK E E N FW DE R IT R U A B S B TR A N N A D IA T ST S R I AN Load-shedding D D R FRESNAYE A H R EKKER L C Area 15 TR IN A OR G LBERT WOODSTOCK VO SIR LOWRY SALT RIVER O T R A N R LB BANTRY BAY A E TAMBOERSKLOOF E R A E T L V D N I R V R N I U M N CT LT AL A O R G E R A TA T E I E A S H E S ARL K S A R M E LIE DISTRICT SIX N IL F E V V O D I C O T L C N K A MIL PHILIP E O M L KG L SIGNAL HILL / LIONS HEAD P O SO R SAN I A A N M A ND G EL N ON A I ILT N N M TIO W STA O GARDENS VREDEHOEK R B PHILI P KGOSA OBSERVATORY NA F P O H CLIFTON O ORANJEZICHT IL L IP K K SANA R K LO GO E O SE F T W T L O E S L R ER S TL SET MOWBRAY ES D Load-shedding O RH CAMPS BAY / BAKOVEN Area 7 Y A ROSEBANK B L I S N WOO K P LSACK M A C S E D O RH A I R O T C I V RONDEBOSCH TABLE MOUNTAIN Load-shedding Area 5 KLIP PER N IO N S U D N A L RONDEBOSCH W E N D N U O R M G NEWLANDS IL L P M M A A A C R I Y N M L PA A R A P AD TE IS O E R P R I F 14 Swartland RIA O WYNBERG NU T C S I E V D CLAREMONT O H R D WOO BOW Drakenstein E OUDEKRAAL 14 D IN B U R G BISHOPSCOURT H RH T OD E ES N N A N Load-shedding 6 T KENILWORTH Area 11 Table Bay Atlantic 2 13 10 T Ocean R 1 O V 15 A Stellenbosch 7 9 T O 12 L 5 22 A WETTO W W N I 21 L 2S 3 A I A 11 M T E O R S L E N O D Hout Bay 16 4 O V 17 O A H 17 N I R N 17 A D 3 CONSTANTIA M E WYNBERG V R I S C LLANDUDNO T Theewaterskloof T E O 8 L Gordon's R CO L I N L A STA NT Bay I HOUT BAY IA H N ROCKLEY False E M H Bay P A L A I N MAI N IA Please Note: T IN N A G - Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information in this map at the time of puMblication .
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Town's Failure to Redistribute Land
    CITY LEASES CAPE TOWN’S FAILURE TO REDISTRIBUTE LAND This report focuses on one particular problem - leased land It is clear that in order to meet these obligations and transform and narrow interpretations of legislation are used to block the owned by the City of Cape Town which should be prioritised for our cities and our society, dense affordable housing must be built disposal of land below market rate. Capacity in the City is limited redistribution but instead is used in an inefficient, exclusive and on well-located public land close to infrastructure, services, and or non-existent and planned projects take many years to move unsustainable manner. How is this possible? Who is managing our opportunities. from feasibility to bricks in the ground. land and what is blocking its release? How can we change this and what is possible if we do? Despite this, most of the remaining well-located public land No wonder, in Cape Town, so little affordable housing has been owned by the City, Province, and National Government in Cape built in well-located areas like the inner city and surrounds since Hundreds of thousands of families in Cape Town are struggling Town continues to be captured by a wealthy minority, lies empty, the end of apartheid. It is time to review how the City of Cape to access land and decent affordable housing. The Constitution is or is underused given its potential. Town manages our public land and stop the renewal of bad leases. clear that the right to housing must be realised and that land must be redistributed on an equitable basis.
    [Show full text]